MDPI - Publisher of Open Access Journals

8 pages, 449 KB

Open AccessArticle

Feasibility and Postoperative Outcome After Duet Procedure for Reversible Multifocality in Eyes with Co-Pathologies

by Barbara S. Brunner, Martin Dirisamer, Nikolaus Luft, Stefan Kassumeh and Siegfried G. Priglinger

J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5583; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155583 - 7 Aug 2025

Viewed by 459

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the simultaneous implantation of a monofocal capsular bag-fixated and a trifocal supplementary sulcus-fixated intraocular lens (duet procedure) in eyes with co-existing pathologies undergoing cataract or refractive lens surgery. Methods: In total, 80 eyes of 40 consecutive patients, who underwent refractive lens exchange or cataract surgery and received the duet procedure due to minor co-pathologies, were included in this retrospective case series. Preoperative assessment comprised slit-lamp biomicroscopy, optical biometry, posterior-segment optical coherence tomography, corneal endothelial specular microscopy, corneal tomography, manifest refraction and distance and near visual acuity testing. Three months postoperatively, uncorrected distance (UDVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) were recorded. Results: The preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was −0.31 ± 4.29 diopters (D), with a mean refractive astigmatism of −0.80 ± 0.60 D. At three months postoperatively, monocular UDVA and binocular UNVA significantly improved from 0.52 ± 0.42 logMAR and 0.32 ± 0.27 logMAR to 0.05 ± 0.09 logMAR and −0.03 ± 0.10 logMAR, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Reversible multifocality provided by the duet procedure appears to be a feasible option in eyes with mild co-existing pathologies, as it yields satisfactory visual and refractive outcomes with high safety. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cataract and Refractive Surgery, and Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation: Recent Advances and Perspectives)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2476 KB

Open AccessArticle

Comparison of a Presbyopia-Correcting Supplementary Intraocular Lens Combination and a Capsular-Bag Lens: An In Vitro Study

by Ramin Khoramnia, Isabella Diana Baur, Weijia Yan, Grzegorz Łabuz and Gerd Uwe Auffarth

Diagnostics 2023, 13(8), 1482; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13081482 - 20 Apr 2023

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2323

Abstract

We evaluated the optical quality of two approaches to trifocality: polypseudophakia versus monopseudophakia. The combination (polypseudophakia) of a monofocal Basis Z B1AWY0 and AddOn Trifocal A4DW0M intraocular lens (IOL) was compared to using one Basis Z Trifocal B1EWYN IOL, all from 1stQ GmbH. In both approaches, we measured modulation transfer function (MTF) and Strehl Ratio (SR) values at 3.0 and 4.5 mm pupil sizes. We determined the through-focus (TF) MTF at 25, 50 and 100 lp/mm for the 3 mm aperture. United States Air Force (USAF) target images were recorded. MTF measurement of the trifocal lens and the combined monofocal and trifocal AddOn IOL showed good performance at the far and near focus for the 3 mm aperture. For the 4.5 mm aperture the MTF improved for the far focus but decreased for the intermediate and near focus. TF MTF showed better contrast at the far focus for the polypseudophakic setup but at the expense of the efficiency at the near focus. However, the USAF chart images revealed only minimal differences between both approaches. The optical quality of the polypseudophakic approach was not affected by the presence of two IOLs instead of one and proved to be comparable with the performance of one capsular-bag-fixated trifocal IOL. Differences between the single vs. two-lens approach seen in the TF MTF analysis could be attributed to the optical design that varied between the trifocal models. Full article

(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 8943 KB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Simulations of Decentration and Tilt of a Supplementary Sulcus-Fixated Intraocular Lens in a Polypseudophakic Combination Using Ray-Tracing Software

by Grzegorz Łabuz, Gerd U. Auffarth, Weijia Yan, Timur M. Yildirim and Ramin Khoramnia

Photonics 2021, 8(8), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8080309 - 2 Aug 2021

Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3736

Abstract

This study aimed to assess image quality after the tilt and decentration of supplementary intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a two-lens configuration. One was designed for sulcus fixation with a nominal power range of 1D–10D and was combined with a capsular fixation 20D IOL. The optical performance of a ray-tracing model was tested under IOL misalignment through the area under the modulation transfer function (MTFa) and wave aberrations. Tilting by 10° resulted in a 4% reduction of the MTFa for a 10D IOL as compared to 9% for the 20D lens. The two models demonstrated good tolerance to a 1 mm decentration; as for the 10D sulcus-fixated lens, the MTFa loss was 2%, and 4% for the capsular fixation lens. Coma and astigmatism increased three- and four-fold, respectively, after a 10° tilt compared to the aberration level induced by the 1 mm decentration. Both analyses showed a trend towards a lower MTF impact and fewer optical errors with decreasing nominal power. In conclusion, when misaligned, low-power sulcus-fixated IOLs might retain their good optical quality. An extreme tilt of 10° has a more detrimental effect on the IOL performance than a 1 mm decentration. The proper alignment of a high-power capsular fixation lens is important in achieving a desirable postoperative outcome. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ocular Imaging for Eye Care)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Search Results (3)

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI

Saved Queries

Search Filter Reset All

Years

Feature Papers

Subjects

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI