Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = robotic gastroscopy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 1477 KB  
Review
Frontiers of Robotic Gastroscopy: A Comprehensive Review of Robotic Gastroscopes and Technologies
by Wojciech Marlicz, Xuyang Ren, Alexander Robertson, Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka, Igor Łoniewski, Paolo Dario, Shuxin Wang, John N Plevris, Anastasios Koulaouzidis and Gastone Ciuti
Cancers 2020, 12(10), 2775; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102775 - 28 Sep 2020
Cited by 52 | Viewed by 7854
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract pathology is common worldwide. With recent advancements in robotics, innovative diagnostic and treatment devices have been developed and several translational attempts made. This review paper aims to provide a highly pictorial critical review of robotic gastroscopes, so that clinicians [...] Read more.
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract pathology is common worldwide. With recent advancements in robotics, innovative diagnostic and treatment devices have been developed and several translational attempts made. This review paper aims to provide a highly pictorial critical review of robotic gastroscopes, so that clinicians and researchers can obtain a swift and comprehensive overview of key technologies and challenges. Therefore, the paper presents robotic gastroscopes, either commercial or at a progressed technology readiness level. Among them, we show tethered and wireless gastroscopes, as well as devices aimed for UGI surgery. The technological features of these instruments, as well as their clinical adoption and performance, are described and compared. Although the existing endoscopic devices have thus far provided substantial improvements in the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment, there are certain aspects that represent unwavering predicaments of the current gastroenterology practice. A detailed list includes difficulties and risks, such as transmission of communicable diseases (e.g., COVID-19) due to the doctor–patient proximity, unchanged learning curves, variable detection rates, procedure-related adverse events, endoscopists’ and nurses’ burnouts, limited human and/or material resources, and patients’ preferences to choose non-invasive options that further interfere with the successful implementation and adoption of routine screening. The combination of robotics and artificial intelligence, as well as remote telehealth endoscopy services, are also discussed, as viable solutions to improve existing platforms for diagnosis and treatment are emerging. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop