Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = spine leiomyosarcoma

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 685 KB  
Systematic Review
Leiomyogenic Tumor of the Spine: A Systematic Review
by Abdurrahman F. Kharbat, Kishore Balasubramanian, Kiran Sankarappan, Ryan D. Morgan, Khawaja M. Hassan, Paolo Palmisciano, Panayiotis E. Pelargos, Michael Chukwu, Othman Bin Alamer, Ali S. Haider, Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh and John F. Burke
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040748 - 10 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2661
Abstract
The study cohort consisted of 83 patients with a mean age of 49.55 (SD 13.72) with a female preponderance (60 patients). Here, 32.14% of patients had primary LTS; the remaining were metastases. Clinical presentation included nonspecific back pain (57.83%), weakness (21.69%) and radicular [...] Read more.
The study cohort consisted of 83 patients with a mean age of 49.55 (SD 13.72) with a female preponderance (60 patients). Here, 32.14% of patients had primary LTS; the remaining were metastases. Clinical presentation included nonspecific back pain (57.83%), weakness (21.69%) and radicular pain (18.07%). History of uterine neoplasia was found in 33.73% of patients. LTS preferentially affected the thoracic spine (51.81%), followed by the lumbar (21.67%) spine. MRI alone was the most common imaging modality (33.33%); in other cases, it was used with CT (22.92%) or X-ray (16.67%); 19.23% of patients had Resection/Fixation, 15.38% had Total en bloc spondylectomy, and 10.26% had Corpectomy. A minority of patients had laminectomy and decompression. Among those with resection, 45.83% had a gross total resection, 29.17% had a subtotal resection, and 16.67% had a near total resection. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positivity for actin (43.37%), desmin (31.33%), and Ki67 (25.30). At a follow-up of 19.3 months, 61.97% of patients were alive; 26.25% of 80 patients received no additional treatment, 23.75% received combination radiotherapy and chemotherapy, only chemotherapy was given to 20%, and radiotherapy was given to 17.5%. Few (2.5%) had further resection. For an average of 12.50 months, 42.31% had no symptoms, while others had residual (19.23%), other metastasis (15.38%), and pain (7.69%). On follow-up of 29 patients, most (68.97%) had resolved symptoms; 61.97% of the 71 patients followed were alive. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone and Spine Metastases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1200 KB  
Article
Postoperative Survival and Clinical Outcomes for Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Spinal Bone Metastasis: A Case Series and Systematic Literature Review
by Deyanira Contartese, Stefano Bandiera, Gianluca Giavaresi, Veronica Borsari, Cristiana Griffoni, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Milena Fini and Francesca Salamanna
Diagnostics 2023, 13(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010015 - 21 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1958
Abstract
Spinal bone metastases from uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) are relatively uncommon and few data are present in the literature. In this study, cases of nine consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic uterine LMS between 2012 and 2022 at a single institution were [...] Read more.
Spinal bone metastases from uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) are relatively uncommon and few data are present in the literature. In this study, cases of nine consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic uterine LMS between 2012 and 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The recorded demographic, operative, and postoperative factors were reviewed, and the functional outcomes were determined by changes in Frankel grade classification during follow-up. A systematic review of the literature was also performed to evaluate operative and postoperative factors and outcomes for patients with the same gynecological metastases to the spine. For our cases, the mean time between primary tumors to bone metastases diagnosis was 5.2 years, and the thoracic vertebrae were the most affected segment. Overall, median survival after diagnosis of metastatic spine lesions was 46 months. For the systematic review, the mean time between primary tumors to bone metastases was 4.9 years, with the lumbar spine as the most involved site of metastasis. Overall, median survival after diagnosis was 102 months. Once a spinal bone lesion from LMS is identified, surgical treatment can be beneficial and successful in alleviating symptoms. Further efforts will be crucial to identify prognostic markers as well as therapeutic targets to improve survival in these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 508 KB  
Systematic Review
Metastasectomy in Leiomyosarcoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Survival Analysis
by Megan Delisle, Bader Alshamsan, Kalki Nagaratnam, Denise Smith, Ying Wang and Amirrtha Srikanthan
Cancers 2022, 14(13), 3055; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133055 - 21 Jun 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3543
Abstract
This study assesses the survival in patients undergoing metastasectomy for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and compares the outcomes by the site of metastasectomy. We conducted a systematic review and pooled survival analysis of patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. Survival was compared between sites of metastasectomy. [...] Read more.
This study assesses the survival in patients undergoing metastasectomy for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and compares the outcomes by the site of metastasectomy. We conducted a systematic review and pooled survival analysis of patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. Survival was compared between sites of metastasectomy. We identified 23 studies including 573 patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. The pooled median survival was 59.6 months (95% CI 33.3 to 66.0). The pooled median survival was longest for lung metastasectomy (72.8 months 95% CI 63.0 to 82.5), followed by liver (34.8 months 95% CI 22.3 to 47.2), spine (14.1 months 95% CI 8.6 to 19.7), and brain (14 months 95% CI 6.7 to 21.3). Two studies compared the survival outcomes between patients who did, versus who did not undergo metastasectomy; both demonstrated a significantly improved survival with metastasectomy. We conclude that surgery is currently being utilized for LMS metastases to the lung, liver, spine, and brain with acceptable survival. Although low quality, comparative studies support a survival benefit with metastasectomy. In the absence of randomized studies, it is impossible to determine whether the survival benefit associated with metastasectomy is due to careful patient selection rather than a surgical advantage; limited data were included about patient selection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Treatment and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 718 KB  
Article
Metastatic Pattern of Truncal and Extremity Leiomyosarcoma: Retrospective Analysis of Predictors, Outcomes, and Detection
by Seth S. Tigchelaar, Christopher Frey, Dharshan Sivaraj, Nicole A. Segovia, David G. Mohler, Robert J. Steffner and Raffi S. Avedian
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(3), 345; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030345 - 24 Feb 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2460
Abstract
Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are a heterogenous group of malignant mesenchymal neoplasms with smooth muscle origin and are classified as either non-uterine (NULMS) or uterine (ULMS). Metastatic pattern, prognostic factors, and ideal staging/surveillance studies for truncal and extremity LMS have not been defined. A retrospective [...] Read more.
Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are a heterogenous group of malignant mesenchymal neoplasms with smooth muscle origin and are classified as either non-uterine (NULMS) or uterine (ULMS). Metastatic pattern, prognostic factors, and ideal staging/surveillance studies for truncal and extremity LMS have not been defined. A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with histopathology-confirmed truncal or extremity LMS between 2009 and 2019 was conducted. Data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, staging, surveillance, and survival endpoints. The primary site was defined as: (1) extremity, (2) flank/Pelvis, or (3) chest wall/Spine. We identified 73 patients, 23.3% of which had metastatic LMS at primary diagnosis, while 68.5% developed metastatic disease at any point. The mean metastatic-free survival from primary diagnosis of localized LMS was 3.0 ± 2.8 years. Analysis of prognostic factors revealed that greater age (≥50 years) at initial diagnosis (OR = 3.74, p = 0.0003), higher tumor differentiation scores (OR = 12.09, p = 0.002), and higher tumor necrosis scores (OR = 3.65, p = 0.026) were significantly associated with metastases. Older patients (≥50 years, OR = 4.76, p = 0.017), patients with larger tumors (≥5 cm or ≥10 cm, OR = 2.12, p = 0.02, OR = 1.92, p = 0.029, respectively), higher differentiation scores (OR = 15.92, p = 0.013), and higher necrosis scores (OR = 4.68, p = 0.044) show worse survival outcomes. Analysis of imaging modality during initial staging and during surveillance showed greater tumor detection frequency when PET imaging was employed, compared to CT imaging (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, truncal and peripheral extremity LMS is an aggressive tumor with high metastatic potential and mortality. While there is a significant risk of metastases to lungs, extra-pulmonary tumors are relatively frequent, and broad surveillance may be warranted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop