Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (269)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = stereotactic body radiotherapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 1013 KB  
Review
Efficacy of Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Lung Cancer and Irradiation Methods Based on Metastatic Site
by Katsuyuki Shirai, Masashi Endo, Shuri Aoki, Noriko Kishi, Yukiko Fukuda, Tetsuo Nonaka and Hitoshi Ishikawa
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2569; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152569 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 730
Abstract
Systemic chemotherapy is a standard treatment for patients with stage IV cancer with distant metastases, and there is little evidence of the effectiveness of local treatments for distant metastatic lesions. However, in recent years, randomized phase II trials targeting oligometastases in lung cancer [...] Read more.
Systemic chemotherapy is a standard treatment for patients with stage IV cancer with distant metastases, and there is little evidence of the effectiveness of local treatments for distant metastatic lesions. However, in recent years, randomized phase II trials targeting oligometastases in lung cancer and solid tumors have reported that local therapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves clinical outcomes. We reviewed previous clinical trials and demonstrated the efficacy of radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a promising treatment that achieves high local control rates for oligometastatic disease. Although SBRT generally does not cause severe adverse events, the safety of SBRT combined with systemic chemotherapy needs to be carefully considered. We discussed the efficacy and safety of SBRT and summarized the details of SBRT methods and techniques for each metastatic site. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to improve the efficacy of SBRT combined with systemic chemotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Current Status of Treatment for Oligometastatic Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 402 KB  
Article
SBRT in the Very Elderly: A Viable Option for Pulmonary Oligometastases?
by Samuel M. Vorbach, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, Ute Ganswindt and Thomas Seppi
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2512; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152512 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 503
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The global population of individuals aged ≥ 80 years is rapidly growing, leading to an increasing incidence of cancer diagnoses in this age group. While stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has proven effective in treating pulmonary oligometastases, patients over 80 remain underrepresented in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The global population of individuals aged ≥ 80 years is rapidly growing, leading to an increasing incidence of cancer diagnoses in this age group. While stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has proven effective in treating pulmonary oligometastases, patients over 80 remain underrepresented in clinical analyses. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicity of SBRT for pulmonary oligometastases in octogenarians. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre analysis included 34 patients aged ≥ 80 years treated with SBRT for histologically confirmed pulmonary oligometastases between 2010 and 2024. Results: A total of 46 pulmonary metastases were treated with curative intent using fractionation schemes of 3 × 15 Gy, 6 × 8 Gy, or 10 × 6 Gy. Median biologically effective dose (BED10) was 112.5 Gy. Follow-up included regular CT imaging and toxicity assessment according to CTCAE. With a median follow-up of 22.6 months, 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control (LC) rates were 95.2%, 95.2%, and 90.2%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 46.6 months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 78.4%, 71.4%, and 59.5%. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 1, 2, and 3 years was 63.4%, 51.6%, and 47.3%, respectively. No grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed. Grade 2 pneumonitis and dermatitis occurred in 2.9% each and were well managed. Asymptomatic rib fractures were detected in 5.9% of patients. No significant predictors for LC, PFS, or OS were identified in univariate analysis. Conclusions: SBRT for pulmonary oligometastases in patients ≥ 80 years is feasible, safe, and effective. High local control, favourable cancer-specific survival, and minimal toxicity support its use as a curative-intent treatment in this growing patient population. These findings contribute important site- and age-specific evidence and support the inclusion of very elderly patients in future prospective SBRT trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment Outcomes in Older Adults with Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3005 KB  
Review
EUS-Guided Pancreaticobiliary Ablation: Is It Ready for Prime Time?
by Nina Quirk, Rohan Ahuja and Nirav Thosani
Immuno 2025, 5(3), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno5030030 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 406
Abstract
Despite advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 5-year survival rates remain at nearly 11%. Cholangiocarcinoma, while not as severe, also possesses similar survival rates. Fewer than 20% of patients are surgical candidates at time of diagnosis; therefore, [...] Read more.
Despite advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 5-year survival rates remain at nearly 11%. Cholangiocarcinoma, while not as severe, also possesses similar survival rates. Fewer than 20% of patients are surgical candidates at time of diagnosis; therefore, it is imperative that alternative therapies are effective for non-surgical patients. There are several thermal ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), microwave ablation (MWA), alcohol ablation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryoablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE), biliary intraluminal brachytherapy, and biliary photodynamic therapy (PDT). Emerging literature in animal models and human patients has demonstrated that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA (EUS-RFA) prevents tumor progression through coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation, and activation of anticancer immunity in local and distant tumor tissue (abscopal effect). RFA treatment has been shown to not only reduce tumor-associated immunosuppressive cells but also increase functional T cells in distant tumor cells not treated with RFA. The remarkable ability to reduce tumor progression and promote tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling makes RFA a very promising non-surgical therapy technique that has the potential to reduce mortality in this patient population. EUS-RFA offers superior precision and safety compared to other ablation techniques for pancreatic and biliary cancers, due to real-time imaging capabilities and minimally invasive nature. Future research should focus on optimizing RFA protocols, exploring combination therapies with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and expanding its use in patients with metastatic disease. This review article will explore the current data and underlying pathophysiology of EUS-RFA while also highlighting the role of ablative therapies as a whole in immune activation response. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 538 KB  
Article
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligometastases Located in the Peritoneum or in the Abdominal Wall: Preliminary Results from a Mono-Institutional Analysis
by Francesco Cuccia, Salvatore D’Alessandro, Marina Campione, Vanessa Figlia, Gianluca Mortellaro, Antonio Spera, Giulia Musicò, Antonino Abbate, Salvatore Russo, Carlo Messina, Giuseppe Carruba, Livio Blasi and Giuseppe Ferrera
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070312 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 552
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s): Peritoneal carcinosis can occur in several gastrointestinal or gynecological malignancies and its prognosis is usually poor. With the advent of more effective systemic agents, the overall survival of metastatic patients has been revolutionized and isolated peritoneal or abdominal wall metastases might benefit [...] Read more.
Purpose/Objective(s): Peritoneal carcinosis can occur in several gastrointestinal or gynecological malignancies and its prognosis is usually poor. With the advent of more effective systemic agents, the overall survival of metastatic patients has been revolutionized and isolated peritoneal or abdominal wall metastases might benefit from local treatments; Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) might be considered in selected patients with oligometastatic presentation. Materials/Methods: Oligometastases were defined according to recent ESTRO/EORTC consensus. Inclusion criteria were as follows: ECOG PS ≤ 2, written informed consent, up to five lesions to be treated at the same time, patients treated with radiotherapy schedules applying minimum 6 Gy per fraction. The primary endpoint of the study was local control (LC); acute and late toxicity, distant progression-free survival (DPFS), time-to-next systemic treatment (TNST), polymetastatic-free survival (PMFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE criteria v5.0. Statistical associations between clinical variables and outcomes were assessed using Fisher’s exact test, and Kruskal–Wallis test, as appropriate. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Between April 2020 and September 2024 a total of 26 oligometastatic lesions located in the peritoneum or in the abdominal wall detected in 20 patients received SBRT with Helical Tomotherapy. All cases have been assessed by a multidisciplinary team. Only in three patients out of twenty did more than one lesion receive SBRT: two lesions in two patients, and five lesions in a single case of colorectal cancer with ongoing third-line systemic treatment. Median total dose was 30 Gy (27–35 Gy) in five fractions (3–5). The most frequent primary neoplasm was ovarian cancer in 14/20, endometrial in 2/20, while the remaining were colorectal, vaginal, pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer. Four lesions were located in the abdominal wall, while the remaining twenty-two were located in the peritoneum. Concurrent systemic therapy was administered in 18/20 patients. With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 6–59), our 1-year LC was 100%, while 1-year DPFS, PMFS, TNTS and OS rates were 54%, 69%, 61% and 83%, respectively. Abdominal wall location and treatment of a subsequent oligometastatic recurrence with a second course of SBRT were both significantly associated with improved OS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). No G ≥ 3 adverse events occurred. Conclusion: Our preliminary data support the use of SBRT in selected cases of oligometastatic disease located in the peritoneum or in the abdominal wall with excellent results in terms of tolerability and promising clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2265 KB  
Review
Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT): Challenging Scenarios and New Frontiers
by Serena Badellino, Francesco Cuccia, Marco Galaverni, Marianna Miele, Matteo Sepulcri, Maria Alessia Zerella, Ruggero Spoto, Emanuele Alì, Emanuela Olmetto, Luca Boldrini, Antonio Pontoriero and Paolo Borghetti
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4871; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144871 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1084
Abstract
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering highly precise, high-dose radiation delivery. However, several clinical challenges remain, particularly in the treatment of central or ultracentral tumors, which are located near critical [...] Read more.
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering highly precise, high-dose radiation delivery. However, several clinical challenges remain, particularly in the treatment of central or ultracentral tumors, which are located near critical structures such as the heart, bronchi, and great vessels. The introduction of MRI-guided SBRT has significantly improved targeting precision, allowing for better assessment of tumor motion and adjacent organ structures. Additionally, SBRT has demonstrated efficacy in multifocal NSCLC, providing an effective option for patients with multiple primary tumors. Recent advances also highlight the role of SBRT in locally advanced NSCLC, where it is increasingly used as a complementary approach to concurrent chemotherapy or in cases where surgery is not feasible. Moreover, the combination of SBRT with immunotherapy has shown promising potential, enhancing tumor control and immunological responses. Furthermore, SBRTs application in SCLC is gaining momentum as a palliative and potentially curative option for selected patients. This narrative review explores these evolving clinical scenarios, the technical innovations supporting SBRT, and the integration of immunotherapy, providing an in-depth look at the new frontiers of SBRT in lung cancer treatment. Despite the challenges, the ongoing development of personalized approaches and technological advancements continues to push the boundaries of SBRTs clinical utility in lung cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 920 KB  
Article
Apalutamide and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Multicenter Real-World Study
by Juan A. Encarnación, Virginia Morillo Macías, Isabel De la Fuente Muñoz, Violeta Derrac Soria, Luis Fernández Fornos, María Albert Antequera, Osamah Amr Rey, Vicente García Martínez, José L. Alonso-Romero and Raquel García Gómez
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2216; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132216 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 808
Abstract
Background: The management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved with the integration of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and metastasis-directed therapies (MDTs). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers precise local control, yet real-world data on its combination with apalutamide remain limited. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: The management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved with the integration of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and metastasis-directed therapies (MDTs). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers precise local control, yet real-world data on its combination with apalutamide remain limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 134 patients with mHSPC treated with apalutamide and SBRT between February 2021 and December 2024. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and treatment safety. PSA kinetics and radiologic response were evaluated, and outcomes were analyzed according to PSA thresholds and treatment timing. Results: Most patients (93.3%) had low-volume disease; 97.1% presented with ≤5 metastases. At a median follow-up of 28 months, LC was 99.3% and 95.5% of patients were progression-free. Complete radiological response was achieved in 87.5% of patients, and 68.4% attained ultralow PSA levels (≤0.02 ng/mL). Undetectable PSA and radiologic complete response were independently associated with improved PFS (p = 0.010 and p = 0.011, respectively). Treatment was well tolerated, with grade ≥3 toxicity occurring in only 2.2% of patients. Conclusions: The combination of apalutamide and SBRT in mHSPC is associated with high local and systemic disease control and minimal toxicity in a real-world setting. This approach may delay systemic treatment intensification and the onset of castration resistance. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Cancer Development and Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2036 KB  
Review
Radiogenomics of Stereotactic Radiotherapy: Genetic Mechanisms Underlying Radiosensitivity, Resistance, and Immune Response
by Damir Vučinić, Ana-Marija Bukovica Petrc, Ivona Antončić, Maja Kolak Radojčić, Matea Lekić and Felipe Couñago
Genes 2025, 16(7), 732; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070732 - 24 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1149
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers ablative radiation doses with sub-millimeter precision. Radiogenomic studies, meanwhile, provide insights into how tumor-intrinsic genetic factors influence responses to such high-dose treatments. This review explores the radiobiological mechanisms underpinning SBRT efficacy, emphasizing the roles of DNA damage response [...] Read more.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers ablative radiation doses with sub-millimeter precision. Radiogenomic studies, meanwhile, provide insights into how tumor-intrinsic genetic factors influence responses to such high-dose treatments. This review explores the radiobiological mechanisms underpinning SBRT efficacy, emphasizing the roles of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, tumor suppressor gene alterations, and inflammatory signaling in shaping tumor radiosensitivity or resistance. SBRT induces complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that robustly activate DDR signaling cascades, particularly via the ATM and ATR kinases. Tumors with proficient DNA repair capabilities often resist SBRT, whereas deficiencies in key repair genes can render them more susceptible to radiation-induced cytotoxicity. Mutations in tumor suppressor genes may impair p53-dependent apoptosis and disrupt cell cycle checkpoints, allowing malignant cells to evade radiation-induced cell death. Furthermore, SBRT provokes the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activates innate immune pathways, potentially leading to immunogenic cell death and reshaping the tumor microenvironment. Radiogenomic profiling has identified genomic alterations and molecular signatures associated with differential responses to SBRT and immune activation. These insights open avenues for precision radiotherapy approaches, including the use of genomic biomarkers for patient selection, the integration of SBRT with DDR inhibitors or immunotherapies, and the customization of treatment plans based on individual tumor genotypes and immune landscapes. Ultimately, these strategies aim to enhance SBRT efficacy and improve clinical outcomes through biologically tailored treatment. This review provides a comprehensive summary of current knowledge on the genetic determinants of response to stereotactic radiotherapy and discusses their implications for personalized cancer treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 713 KB  
Article
Ablative Five-Fraction CT Versus MR-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: In Silico Evaluation of Interfraction Anatomic Changes as a Rationale for Online Adaptive Replanning
by Adeel Kaiser, Nicole Luther, Kathryn E. Mittauer, Amna Gul, Robert A. Herrera, Mukesh K. Roy, Ashley Fellows, Amy Rzepczynski, Will Deere, Matthew D. Hall, Rupesh Kotecha, Nema Bassiri-Gharb, Alonso N. Gutierrez and Michael D. Chuong
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2061; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132061 - 20 Jun 2025
Viewed by 821
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). We performed an in silico comparison of non-adapted CTgRT versus SMART to better understand the potential benefit of oART for ablative pancreatic SBRT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated original and daily adapted SMART plans that were previously delivered for 20 consecutive LAPC cases (120 total plans across all patients) treated on a 0.35 T MR-linac prescribed to 50 Gy (gross disease) and 33 Gy (elective sites) simultaneously in five fractions. Six comparative CTgRT plans for each patient (one original, five daily treatment) were retrospectively generated with the same prescribed dose and planning parameters as the SMART plans assuming no oART availability. The impact of daily anatomic changes on CTgRT and SMART plans without oART was evaluated across each treatment day MRI scan acquired for SMART. Results: Ninety percent of cases involved the pancreatic head. No statistically significant differences were seen between CTgRT and SMART with respect to target coverage. Nearly all (96%) fractions planned on either CT or MRI platforms exceeded at least one GI organ at risk (OAR) constraint without oART. Significant differences favoring SMART over non-adaptive CTgRT were observed for the duodenum V35 Gy ≤ 0.5 cc (34.2 vs. 41.9 Gy, p = 0.0035) and duodenum V40 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (37 vs. 52.5 Gy, p = 0.0006) constraints. Stomach V40 Gy trended towards significance favoring SMART (37 vs. 40.3 Gy, p = 0.057) while no significant differences were seen. Conclusions: This is the first study that quantifies the frequency and extent of GI OAR constraint violations that would occur during ablative five-fraction SBRT using SMART vs. CTgRT. GI OAR constraint violations are expected for most fractions without oART whereas all constraints can be achieved with oART. As such, these data suggest that oART should be required for ablative five-fraction pancreatic SBRT. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1827 KB  
Article
Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Surgery for Stage I Lung Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Cohort Study Utilizing Propensity Score Overlap Weighting and AI-Based CT Imaging Analysis
by Eun Hye Lee, Young Joo Suh, Jong Won Park, Jisu Moon, Sangjoon Park, Chang Geol Lee, Hong In Yoon, Byung Jo Park, Jin Gu Lee, Dae Joon Kim, Seung Hyun Yong, Sang Hoon Lee, Chang Young Lee, Jaeho Cho and Eun Young Kim
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 2015; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122015 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 541
Abstract
Background: With rising life expectancy and widespread lung cancer screening, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) incidence has increased. While surgery is the standard treatment for operable stage I NSCLC, many patients are ineligible due to age or comorbidities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) [...] Read more.
Background: With rising life expectancy and widespread lung cancer screening, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) incidence has increased. While surgery is the standard treatment for operable stage I NSCLC, many patients are ineligible due to age or comorbidities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has achieved good primary tumor control rates and overall survival. This study compares the outcomes of SBRT and surgery for stage I NSCLC using propensity score overlap-weighted dataset. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical stage I NSCLC patients treated at a tertiary hospital from 2012 to 2021. Baseline differences between SBRT and surgery groups were adjusted using overlap weighting. AI-based CT analysis (CT AI-CAD) assessed tumor characteristics, verified by radiologists. Primary outcomes were 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and overall survival, with subgroup analyses based on tumor features. Results: Of 1474 patients, 1258 underwent surgery, and 216 received SBRT. After overlap weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and OS showed no statistically significant differences between SBRT and surgery groups (recurrence: 16.2% vs. 16.1%; OS: 80.5% vs. 82.9%). Further AI-based CT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in recurrence rates across tumor features. A solid tumor diameter associated with a significant increase in recurrence was identified as 16.6 mm for SBRT and 18.6 mm for surgery. Conclusions: After overlap weighting, SBRT and surgery showed no statistically significant differences in treatment outcomes in stage I NSCLC. These findings may help guide the timing and selection of safe and effective treatment approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methods and Technologies Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2685 KB  
Review
SIU-ICUD: Management of Lymph Node–Positive Prostate Cancer
by Haitham Shaheen, Mack Roach and Eman Essam Elsemary
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(3), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6030046 - 13 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 941
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The management of localized prostate cancer with regional lymph node involvement (N1M0) presents significant clinical challenges. While once considered indicative of systemic disease, improved imaging and evolving treatment paradigms have redefined node-positive disease as potentially curable. This systematic review aims to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The management of localized prostate cancer with regional lymph node involvement (N1M0) presents significant clinical challenges. While once considered indicative of systemic disease, improved imaging and evolving treatment paradigms have redefined node-positive disease as potentially curable. This systematic review aims to assess current evidence regarding treatment modalities and outcomes for patients with localized N1M0 prostate cancer. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating therapeutic strategies for N1M0 prostate cancer. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, retrospective analyses, and consensus guidelines. Treatment approaches reviewed included radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT), prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Key outcomes included overall survival (OS), biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Multimodal approaches—particularly the combination of ADT with WPRT or adjuvant radiotherapy following RP—were associated with improved survival outcomes. Patients with limited nodal burden and undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels derived the most benefit. The use of prostate-specific antigen membrane positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) enhanced detection and guided MDT in oligorecurrent disease. SBRT, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), and hypofractionated regimens demonstrated promising efficacy with acceptable toxicity profiles. Conclusions: Node-positive localized prostate cancer is optimally managed with individualized, multidisciplinary strategies. Combining systemic and locoregional treatments improves outcomes in selected patients. Ongoing prospective studies are warranted to refine patient selection, optimize treatment sequencing, and integrate novel imaging and systemic agents. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 724 KB  
Article
Planned Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Residual Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases After Surgery: A Single-Arm Retrospective Study
by Sixuan Li, Dezuo Dong, Xuan Zheng, Hongzhi Wang, Kun Wang, Baocai Xing and Weihu Wang
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060347 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 973
Abstract
Given the promising outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), we proposed an innovative strategy combining surgery with planned liver SBRT for CRLMs. This retrospective study included patients who underwent curative-intent surgery combined with planned liver [...] Read more.
Given the promising outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), we proposed an innovative strategy combining surgery with planned liver SBRT for CRLMs. This retrospective study included patients who underwent curative-intent surgery combined with planned liver SBRT from July 2019 to October 2023. Planned liver SBRT was delivered to residual unresectable and unablatable lesions with maximum diameters of ≤5 cm. Outcomes included local failure (LF), intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (IHRFS), extrahepatic recurrence-free survival (EHRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiation-related adverse events. A total of 69 patients were included. The 1-, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF after SBRT were 7.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. The median PFS was 6.2 months, and the median OS was 45.8 months. Multivariate analysis identified RAS/BRAF mutations, extrahepatic metastases excluding lung involvement, and higher CEA as independent predictors of poorer OS. Intrahepatic recurrence was the predominant pattern of first disease progression after combination treatment. Acute grade 1–2 radiation-related adverse events occurred in 56.5% of patients, while grade 3 toxicities were reported in 4.3%. This approach offers favorable long-term outcomes, suggesting its potential to broaden the indications for curative-intent local treatments in CRLMs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1044 KB  
Article
Impact of Long-Term Chemotherapy on Outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World UK Multi-Centre Study
by Umair Mahmood, Joanna Lynch, Simran Kaur Sandhu, Zahir Amin, John Bridgewater, Daniel Hochhauser, Kai-Keen Shiu, Paul Miller, Elizabeth C. Smyth and Khurum Khan
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111896 - 5 Jun 2025
Viewed by 836
Abstract
Background: We reviewed outcomes of short and long-term chemotherapy with or without breaks in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Methods: PDAC patients receiving ≥3 chemotherapy cycles between 2019 and 2024 at three institutions were included. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy (PFS1), overall survival [...] Read more.
Background: We reviewed outcomes of short and long-term chemotherapy with or without breaks in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Methods: PDAC patients receiving ≥3 chemotherapy cycles between 2019 and 2024 at three institutions were included. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy (PFS1), overall survival (OS) and best overall response (BOR) to chemotherapy were assessed using the Wilcoxon test, Kaplan–Meier test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Results: We screened 237 patients, and 135 patients met the study criteria. Among these patients, 25 had resectable disease, and 110 had unresectable/metastatic disease (13% borderline resectable (BRPC), 20% locally advanced (LAPC), 10% localised developing metastases, 57% de novo metastatic). Ten patients (7%) underwent genetic profiling; KRAS aberrations (N = 4), actionable PLAB2/BRCA2/FGFR2 mutations (N = 3), ATM/BRIP1 alteration (N = 1). Two patients were managed with PARP inhibitors after receiving multiple lines of chemotherapy. Median PFS1 and OS were concordant with the published literature, but select patient groups achieved prolonged survival outcomes. Among the 36 BRPC/LAPC patients, we observed >1-year PFS1 in 9 (25%) patients and >2-year OS in 3 (8%) patients. Among the 63 de novo metastatic patients, we observed >1-year PFS1 and >2-year OS in 6 (10%) patients. Among patients with localised disease, smoking history was a poor prognostic factor with respect to OS (p = 0.03). Improved PFS1 and OS was associated with ≥6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy, its duration of ≥3.66 months, and local treatment after first chemotherapy (p < 0.05 for all). Stereotactic body radiotherapy following first-line chemotherapy was delivered in N = 6 (27%) and N = 1 (7%) of patients with LAPC and BRPC, respectively. Chemotherapy interruption duration, but not number, was associated with PFS1 and OS only in the localised cohort (p < 0.05). In patients with de novo metastatic disease, prevalence of type 2 diabetes was adversely associated with OS (p = 0.03). Improved PFS and OS was associated with ≥6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy, its duration of ≥4.37 months, and BOR to it (only in this cohort) (p < 0.05 for all). A favourable OS was associated with >1 line of chemotherapy (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Despite challenges, extended chemotherapy and multiple treatment lines may improve survival, with localised treatments benefiting select patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Pancreatic Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4333 KB  
Article
Intrafractional Motion in Online-Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy of Adrenal Metastases Leads to Reduced Target Volume Coverage and Elevated Organ-at-Risk Doses
by Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen, Tobias P. Hartschuh, Claudia Katharina Renkamp, Carolin Buchele, Fabian Schlüter, Elisabetta Sandrini, Fabian Weykamp, Sebastian Regnery, Eva Meixner, Laila König, Jürgen Debus, Sebastian Klüter and Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1533; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091533 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 599
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is frequently used in patients with adrenal metastases. Motion of adherent radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) and tumors influence OAR toxicity and tumor control. Online-adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) can address and mitigate interfractional changes. However, the impact of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is frequently used in patients with adrenal metastases. Motion of adherent radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) and tumors influence OAR toxicity and tumor control. Online-adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) can address and mitigate interfractional changes. However, the impact of intrafractional variations in adrenal MRgRT is unknown. Methods: A total of 23 patients with 24 adrenal metastases were treated with MRgRT. After daily plan adaptation and before beam application, an additional (preRT) 3d MRI was acquired. PreRT target volumes and OARs were retrospectively recontoured in 200 fractions. The delivered, online-adapted treatment plans, as well as non-adapted baseline plans, were calculated on these re-contoured structures to quantify the dosimetric impact of intrafractional variations on target volume coverage and OAR doses with and without online adaptation. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were calculated. Results: The median time between the two MRIs was 56.4 min. GTV and PTV coverage (dose to 95% of the PTV, D95%, and volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose, V100%) were significantly inferior in the preRT plans. GTV Dmean was significantly impaired in left-sided metastases, but not in right-sided metastases. Compared to non-adapted preRT plans, adapted preRT plans were still significantly superior for all GTV and PTV metrics. Intrafractional violations of OAR constraints were frequent. D0.5cc and the volume exposed to the near-maximum dose constraint were significantly higher in the preRT plans. The volume exposed to the D0.5cc constraints in single fractions escalated up to 1.5 cc for the esophagus, 3.2 cc for the stomach, 5.3 cc for the duodenum and 7.3 cc for the bowel. This led to significantly elevated NTCPs for the stomach, bowel and duodenum. Neither PTV D95%, nor gastrointestinal OAR maximum doses were significantly impaired by longer fraction duration. Conclusions: Intrafractional motion in adrenal MRgRT caused significant impairment of target volume coverage (D95% and V100%), potentially undermining local control. Frequent violation of gastrointestinal OAR constraints led to elevated NTCP. Compared to non-adaptive treatment, online adaptation still highly improved GTV and PTV coverage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Tumor Ablation: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1000 KB  
Article
Immune Modulation Through Stereotactic Radiotherapy: The Role of TBX21, GATA-3, FoxP3, and RORɣt
by Aybala Nur Ucgul, Huseyin Bora, Gizem Yaz Aydin, Ozlem Gulbahar and Ummu Habibe Koken
Medicina 2025, 61(4), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040717 - 13 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 660
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Stereotactic radiotherapy enhances local tumor control by delivering high doses directly to the tumor. It is thought to activate the immune system via T-cells, possibly creating a systemic response. This study aims to evaluate stereotactic body radiotherapy’s (SBRT) impact [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Stereotactic radiotherapy enhances local tumor control by delivering high doses directly to the tumor. It is thought to activate the immune system via T-cells, possibly creating a systemic response. This study aims to evaluate stereotactic body radiotherapy’s (SBRT) impact on the immune system by measuring T-cell transcription factors, such as TBX21, GATA-3, FoxP3, and RORɣt. Materials and Methods: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 103 patients before SBRT and from 66 patients two months post-treatment. We measured transcription factors TBX21, GATA-3, FOXP3, and RORγt using ELISA, and performed a complete blood count and C-reactive protein analysis to rule out infections. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and correlation analyses to assess changes before and after treatment. Results: Post-treatment, significant reductions were observed in TBX21 (Th1), GATA-3 (Th2), and FOXP3 (Treg), while RORɣt (Th17) remained stable but trended higher in lung cancer patients. No correlations were found with demographic factors. However, TBX21 levels were significantly related to the planning target volume (PTV) and biologically effective dose (BED10) in the lung region. Larger PTVs (≥16.5 cc) and higher BED10 doses (≥100 Gy) were linked to smaller reductions in TBX21 (p = 0.008, p = 0.04) and increased RORɣt levels (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Stereotactic radiotherapy reduces immunosuppressive markers like FOXP3 and GATA-3, indicating its potential to boost immune activation by suppressing Treg and Th2 cells. Larger target volumes and higher BED10 values may enhance Th1 responses through TBX21. These findings suggest that SBRT activates the immune system, and its combination with immunotherapy could be promising. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 217 KB  
Review
Treatment Approaches for Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of Ablative Radiotherapy
by William Gombrich, Nicholas Eustace, Yufei Liu, Ramya Muddasani, Adam Rock, Ravi Salgia, Terence Williams, Jyoti Malhotra, Percy Lee and Arya Amini
Cancers 2025, 17(7), 1233; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17071233 - 5 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1576
Abstract
Oligoprogressive disease refers to the setting of a prior or ongoing receipt of systemic therapy, with typically up to three metastatic areas having increased in size and/or avidity compared to the start of the systemic therapy. The role of local ablative therapy (LAT) [...] Read more.
Oligoprogressive disease refers to the setting of a prior or ongoing receipt of systemic therapy, with typically up to three metastatic areas having increased in size and/or avidity compared to the start of the systemic therapy. The role of local ablative therapy (LAT) including radiation has mostly been evaluated in the oligometastatic setting with limited data in oligoprogression. A similar principle of using ablative radiation in the oligometastatic setting may be applied to consolidative therapy for oligoprogressive disease. If systemic therapy can control the majority of the disease, and a few areas of therapy-resistant clones continue to proliferate, then potentially controlling those few resistant clones while maintaining systemic control may be beneficial. Doing so may also extend the duration of benefit of the systemic therapy and reserve next systemic line options at a later point, and potentially improve progression free survival (PFS). Here, we review the current data evaluating the role of radiation in oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ongoing trials. Full article
Back to TopTop