Search Results (5)

Background/Objectives: Cystoid macular edema (CMO) is a common complication that follows cataract surgery, presenting management challenges due to the lack of standardized treatment guidelines and the potential for spontaneous resolution. This study aimed to evaluate various treatment modalities for post-operative CMO, including topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), periocular steroids, and intravitreal injections. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the efficacy of different treatment approaches for post-operative CMO. Studies evaluating topical NSAIDs, periocular steroids, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TCA), dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex), and intravitreal bevacizumab were included. The main outcomes assessed included improvements in vision, resolution of CMO, recurrence rates, and safety profile. Results: Topical NSAIDs, particularly ketorolac and diclofenac, showed effectiveness in acute CMO, while their efficacy in chronic cases was variable. Periocular steroids, including retrobulbar TCA and sub-Tenon injections, demonstrated significant improvements in vision and the resolution of CMO, especially in cases resistant to topical therapy. Intravitreal TCA and dexamethasone implants exhibited variable effects on CMO resolution and recurrence rates, with some studies reporting sustained improvements over 12 months. The role of intravitreal bevacizumab as initial therapy remains unclear, although it may be considered in cases unresponsive to steroids. Conclusions: Topical NSAIDs, often combined with periocular steroids, serve as first-line therapy, with periocular steroids offering additional efficacy in resistant cases. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatment algorithms and improve outcomes for patients with post-operative CMO Full article

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment with intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) was launched as a novel treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), but the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) as a specific adverse effect of brolucizumab has been reported. We evaluated the dynamics of inflammatory factors in AMD in patients with or without IOI before and after anti-VEGF treatment with IVBr. We describe three patients who did not develop inflammation after three consecutive administrations of IVBr and three in whom inflammation occurred after the first IVBr treatment. The presence or absence of inflammation was determined by slit-lamp examination and a laser flare meter. Aqueous humor was obtained during anti-VEGF treatment with IVBr. Levels of VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, interferon-inducible 10 kDa protein (IP-10), Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligands (Flt-3L), and fractalkine were measured. Vision worsened in one patient who developed IOI after initial IVBr, so IVBr was discontinued and the patient was switched to intravitreal aflibercept with sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide. IVBr was continued in the two other patients with IOI. VEGF decreased after IVBr in all patients with and without IOI. On the other hand, at 1 month IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, IP-10, and Flt-3L were higher in the three patients with IOI compared with baseline and with the three patients without IOI. In two patients with IOI, not only flares but also IL-8, IP-10, and Flt-3L decreased from 1 to 2 months after IVBr despite continued IVBr. This case series might lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of IOI after IVBr. Full article

Background/Objectives: The object of this study was to determine the outcomes of treatments other than anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) before and after the approval of anti-VEGF therapy in Japan. Methods: This was a retrospective study registered in the database of the Survey of Treatment for DME (STREAT-DME). A total of 1683 patients treated from 2010 to 2017 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) a pre-group, treated before the approval of anti-VEGF agents (2010–2013, n = 771), and (2) a post-group (2014–2017, n = 912). Each group was further categorized based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA): (i) improved from poor (>0.3 logMAR units) to good (≤0.3 logMAR units) or (ii) decreased from good to poor. Results: In the pre-group, 18.5% of patients improved from poor to good BCVA out of the total patient population (p < 0.0001), along with 17.3% out of those administered anti-VEGF therapy (p = 0.139), 20.5% of those administered a sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA, p = 0.02), 17.7% (p = 0.20) of those administered photocoagulation, and 14.2% of those who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV, p = 0.0001). In the post-group, 21.8% had improved BCVA out of the total patient population (p < 0.0001), along with 27.2% of those undergoing anti-VEGF therapy (p < 0.0001), 16.7% of those administered STTA (p < 0.0001), and 27.2% of those who underwent PPV (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: STTA and PPV are effective to a certain extent, even after the approval of anti-VEGF agents. Full article

Background and Objectives: Faricimab is the first intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and angiopoietin-2 bispecific monoclonal antibody. Here, we evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes of faricimab treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) that was refractory to ranibizumab or aflibercept. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational, consecutive-case study of patients who had DME that was refractory to treatment with ranibizumab or aflibercept and were treated with faricimab between July 2022 and January 2023 under a pro re nata regimen. All the participants were followed for ≥4 months after the initiation of faricimab. The primary outcome was a recurrence interval of ≥12 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were the changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Results: We analyzed 18 eyes of 18 patients. The mean recurrence interval of previous anti-VEGF injection was 5.8 ± 2.5 weeks, which was significantly extended to 10.8 ± 4.9 weeks (p = 0.0005) by the switch to faricimab. Eight patients (44.4%) achieved a recurrence interval of ≥12 weeks. A history of subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (p = 0.0034) and the presence of disorganization of the retinal inner layers (p = 0.0326) were found to be significantly associated with a recurrence interval of <12 weeks. The mean BCVAs were 0.23 ± 0.28 logMAR and 0.19 ± 0.23 logMAR, and the mean CMTs were 473.8 ± 222.0 µm and 381.3 ± 219.4 µm at baseline and 4 months, respectively, but these changes were not statistically significant. None of the patients experienced serious adverse events. Conclusions: Faricimab may extend the treatment interval for patients with DME that is refractory to ranibizumab or aflibercept. DME previously treated with the subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide or associated with disorganization of the retinal inner layers may be less likely to be associated with a longer recurrence interval after switching to faricimab. Full article

Macular edema (ME) is one of the eventual outcomes of various intraocular and systemic pathologies. The pathogenesis for ME is not yet entirely understood; however, some of the common risk factors for its development have been identified. While this investigation will not discuss the numerous etiologies of ME in detail, it appraises the two most widely studied delivery modalities of intraocular corticosteroids in the treatment of ME—intravitreal injection (IVI) and sub-Tenon’s infusion (STI). A thorough review of the medical literature was conducted to identify the efficacy and safety of IVI and STI, specifically for the administration of triamcinolone acetonide (TA), in the setting of ME in an attempt to elucidate a preferred steroid delivery modality for treatment of ME. Full article