Search Results (2)

Background/Objectives: Sugemalimab demonstrated clinical efficacy in the GEMSTONE-303 trial, but its cost-effectiveness remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy (CAPOX) as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma, compared to chemotherapy alone, from the perspective of Taiwan’s healthcare payer. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to simulate outcomes over a 40-year time horizon, and model parameters were derived from GEMSTONE-303 and the wider literature. Health benefits were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and only direct medical costs were included, with both discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at three times the 2024 GDP per capita. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted alongside scenario analyses. Results: Compared to capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) alone, adding sugemalimab yielded an incremental gain of 0.39 QALYs at an additional cost of USD 47,020, resulting in an incremental net monetary benefit of −USD 7478. Conclusions: Sugemalimab plus CAPOX is not cost-effective for advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma from the Taiwan payer’s perspective. Achieving cost-effectiveness would require a 20–30% price reduction for sugemalimab (to USD 1204–USD 1376 per 600 mg), assuming first-line therapy is administered for the median treatment duration observed in the GEMSTONE-303 trial. If reimbursement continued until disease progression, a reduction of approximately 68% would be required (USD 550 per 600 mg). Full article

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and management have transformed clinical practice, particularly with the integration of immunotherapy and target therapies. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out for the period between October 2016 to September 2024. Phase II and III randomized trials evaluating ICI monotherapy, ICI–chemotherapy combinations, and dual ICI regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results: PD-1-targeted therapies demonstrated superior OS compared to PD-L1-based regimens, with cemiplimab monotherapyranking highest for OS benefit (posterior probability: 90%), followed by sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and pemetrexed—PBC. PFS atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and PBC, and camrelizumab plus PBC were the most effective regimens. ICI–chemotherapy combinations achieved higher ORRs but were associated with greater toxicity. The most favorable safety profiles were observed with cemiplimab, nivolumab, and avelumab monotherapy, while atezolizumab plus PBC and sugemalimab plus PBC carried the highest toxicity burdens. Conclusions: In PD-L1-unselected advanced NSCLC, PD-1 blockade—particularly cemiplimab monotherapy—and rationally designed ICI–chemotherapy combinations represent the most efficacious treatment strategies. Balancing efficacy with safety remains critical, especially in the absence of predictive biomarkers. These findings support a patient-tailored approach to immunotherapy and highlight the need for further biomarker-driven and real-world investigations to optimize treatment selection. Full article