Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = surface upward longwave radiation (SULR)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 4726 KiB  
Article
Land Surface Longwave Radiation Retrieval from ASTER Clear-Sky Observations
by Zhonghu Jiao and Xiwei Fan
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(13), 2406; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132406 - 30 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1253
Abstract
Surface longwave radiation (SLR) plays a pivotal role in the Earth’s energy balance, influencing a range of environmental processes and climate dynamics. As the demand for high spatial resolution remote sensing products grows, there is an increasing need for accurate SLR retrieval with [...] Read more.
Surface longwave radiation (SLR) plays a pivotal role in the Earth’s energy balance, influencing a range of environmental processes and climate dynamics. As the demand for high spatial resolution remote sensing products grows, there is an increasing need for accurate SLR retrieval with enhanced spatial detail. This study focuses on the development and validation of models to estimate SLR using measurements from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) sensor. Given the limitations posed by fewer spectral bands and data products in ASTER compared to moderate-resolution sensors, the proposed approach combines an atmospheric radiative transfer model MODerate resolution atmospheric TRANsmission (MODTRAN) with the Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm to estimate SLR. The MODTRAN simulations were performed to construct a representative training dataset based on comprehensive global atmospheric profiles and surface emissivity spectra data. Global sensitivity analyses reveal that key inputs influencing the accuracy of SLR retrievals should reflect surface thermal radiative signals and near-surface atmospheric conditions. Validated against ground-based measurements, surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) and surface downward longwave radiation (SDLR) using ASTER thermal infrared bands and surface elevation estimations resulted in root mean square errors of 17.76 W/m2 and 25.36 W/m2, with biases of 3.42 W/m2 and 3.92 W/m2, respectively. Retrievals show systematic biases related to extreme temperature and moisture conditions, e.g., causing overestimation of SULR in hot humid conditions and underestimation of SDLR in arid conditions. While challenges persist, particularly in addressing atmospheric variables and cloud masking, this work lays a foundation for accurate SLR retrieval from high spatial resolution sensors like ASTER. The potential applications extend to upcoming satellite missions, such as the Landsat Next, and contribute to advancing high-resolution remote sensing capabilities for an improved understanding of Earth’s energy dynamics. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 5077 KiB  
Article
Estimation and Evaluation of 15 Minute, 40 Meter Surface Upward Longwave Radiation Downscaled from the Geostationary FY-4B AGRI
by Limeng Zheng, Biao Cao, Qiang Na, Boxiong Qin, Junhua Bai, Yongming Du, Hua Li, Zunjian Bian, Qing Xiao and Qinhuo Liu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(7), 1158; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071158 - 27 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1599
Abstract
Surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) is one of the four components of surface net radiation. Geostationary satellites can provide high temporal but coarse spatial resolution SULR products. Downscaling coarse SULR to a higher resolution is important for fine-scale thermal condition monitoring. Statistical regression [...] Read more.
Surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) is one of the four components of surface net radiation. Geostationary satellites can provide high temporal but coarse spatial resolution SULR products. Downscaling coarse SULR to a higher resolution is important for fine-scale thermal condition monitoring. Statistical regression downscaling is widely used due to its simplicity and is built on the assumption that the thermal parameter like land surface temperature (LST) or SULR has a relationship with the related surface factors like the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and the relationship remains unchanged in any scales. In this study, to establish the relationship between SULR and the related surface factors, we chose the multiple linear regression (MLR) model and five surface factors (i.e., the modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI), normalized difference built-up and soil index (NDBSI), NDVI, normalized moisture difference index (NMDI), and urban index (UI)) to drive the downscaling process. Additionally, a step-by-step downscaling strategy was applied to reach the 100-fold increase in spatial resolution, transitioning the estimated SULR from 4 km of the advanced geostationary radiation imager (AGRI) onboard FengYun-4B (FY-4B) satellite to 40 m of the visual and infrared multispectral imager (VIMI) in infrared spectrum onboard GaoFen5-02 (GF5-02). Finally, we evaluated the downscaling results by comparing the downscaled SULR values with the in situ measured SULR and GF5-02-calculated SULR, and the root mean square errors (RMSEs) were 19.70 W/m2 and 24.86 W/m2, respectively. Throughout this MLR-based step-by-step downscaling method (high-frequency data from FY-4B and high spatial resolution data from GF5-02), high spatiotemporal SULR (15 min temporal resolution, 40 m spatial resolution) were successfully generated instead of coarse spatial resolution ones from the FY-4B satellite or a coarse temporal resolution one from the GF5-02 satellite, relieving the above-mentioned conflict to some extent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing II)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 6243 KiB  
Article
Estimating All-Weather Surface Longwave Radiation from Satellite Passive Microwave Data
by Zhonghu Jiao
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(23), 5960; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235960 - 25 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2324
Abstract
Surface longwave radiation (SLR) is an essential geophysical parameter of Earth’s energy balance, and its estimation based on thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing data has been extensively studied. However, it is difficult to estimate cloudy SLR from TIR measurements. Satellite passive microwave (PMW) [...] Read more.
Surface longwave radiation (SLR) is an essential geophysical parameter of Earth’s energy balance, and its estimation based on thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing data has been extensively studied. However, it is difficult to estimate cloudy SLR from TIR measurements. Satellite passive microwave (PMW) radiometers measure microwave radiation under the clouds and therefore can estimate SLR in all weather conditions. We constructed SLR retrieval models using brightness temperature (BT) data from an Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) based on a neural network (NN) algorithm. SLR from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) product was used as the reference. NN-based models were able to reproduce well the spatial variability of SLR from ERA5 at the global scale. Validations indicate a reasonably good performance was found for land sites, with a bias of 1.32 W/m2, root mean squared error (RMSE) of 35.37 W/m2, and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.89 for AMSR2 surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) data, and a bias of −2.26 W/m2, RMSE of 32.94 W/m2, and R2 of 0.82 for AMSR2 surface downward longwave radiation (SDLR) data. AMSR2 SULR and SDLR retrieval accuracies were higher for oceanic sites, with biases of −2.98 and −4.04 W/m2, RMSEs of 6.50 and 13.42 W/m2, and R2 values of 0.83 and 0.66, respectively. This study provides a solid foundation for the development of a PMW SLR retrieval model applicable at the global scale to generate long-term continuous SLR products using multi-year satellite PMW data and for future research with a higher spatiotemporal resolution. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 10668 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Surface Upward Longwave Radiation in the CMIP6 Models with Ground and Satellite Observations
by Jiawen Xu, Xiaotong Zhang, Chunjie Feng, Shuyue Yang, Shikang Guan, Kun Jia, Yunjun Yao, Xianhong Xie, Bo Jiang, Jie Cheng and Xiang Zhao
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(21), 4464; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214464 - 6 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2943
Abstract
Surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) is an indicator of thermal conditions over the Earth’s surface. In this study, we validated the simulated SULR from 51 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) general circulation models (GCMs) through a comparison with ground measurements and satellite-retrieved SULR [...] Read more.
Surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) is an indicator of thermal conditions over the Earth’s surface. In this study, we validated the simulated SULR from 51 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) general circulation models (GCMs) through a comparison with ground measurements and satellite-retrieved SULR from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System, Energy Balanced and Filled (CERES EBAF). Moreover, we improved the SULR estimations by a fusion of multiple CMIP6 GCMs using multimodel ensemble (MME) methods. Large variations were found in the monthly mean SULR among the 51 CMIP6 GCMs; the bias and root mean squared error (RMSE) of the individual CMIP6 GCMs at 133 sites ranged from ?3 to 24 W m?2 and 22 to 38 W m?2, respectively, which were higher than those found between the CERES EBAF and GCMs. The CMIP6 GCMs did not improve the overestimation of SULR compared to the CMIP5 GCMs. The Bayesian model averaging (BMA) method showed better performance in simulating SULR than the individual GCMs and simple model averaging (SMA) method, with a bias of 0 W m?2 and an RMSE of 19.29 W m?2 for the 133 sites. In terms of the global annual mean SULR, our best estimation for the CMIP6 GCMs using the BMA method was 392 W m?2 during 2000–2014. We found that the SULR varied between 386 and 393 W m?2 from 1850 to 2014, exhibiting an increasing tendency of 0.2 W m?2 per decade (p < 0.05). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4721 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Six High-Spatial Resolution Clear-Sky Surface Upward Longwave Radiation Estimation Methods with MODIS
by Boxiong Qin, Biao Cao, Hua Li, Zunjian Bian, Tian Hu, Yongming Du, Yingpin Yang, Qing Xiao and Qinhuo Liu
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(11), 1834; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111834 - 5 Jun 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 2831
Abstract
Surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) is a critical component in the calculation of the Earth’s surface radiation budget. Multiple clear-sky SULR estimation methods have been developed for high-spatial resolution satellite observations. Here, we comprehensively evaluated six SULR estimation methods, including the temperature-emissivity physical [...] Read more.
Surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) is a critical component in the calculation of the Earth’s surface radiation budget. Multiple clear-sky SULR estimation methods have been developed for high-spatial resolution satellite observations. Here, we comprehensively evaluated six SULR estimation methods, including the temperature-emissivity physical methods with the input of the MYD11/MYD21 (TE-MYD11/TE-MYD21), the hybrid methods with top-of-atmosphere (TOA) linear/nonlinear/artificial neural network regressions (TOA-LIN/TOA-NLIN/TOA-ANN), and the hybrid method with bottom-of-atmosphere (BOA) linear regression (BOA-LIN). The recently released MYD21 product and the BOA-LIN—a newly developed method that considers the spatial heterogeneity of the atmosphere—is used initially to estimate SULR. In addition, the four hybrid methods were compared with simulated datasets. All the six methods were evaluated using the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products and the Surface Radiation Budget Network (SURFRAD) in situ measurements. Simulation analysis shows that the BOA-LIN is the best one among four hybrid methods with accurate atmospheric profiles as input. Comparison of all the six methods shows that the TE-MYD21 performed the best, with a root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE) of 14.0 and −0.2 W/m2, respectively. The RMSE of BOA-LIN, TOA-NLIN, TOA-LIN, TOA-ANN, and TE-MYD11 are equal to 15.2, 16.1, 17.2, 21.2, and 18.5 W/m2, respectively. TE-MYD21 has a much better accuracy than the TE-MYD11 over barren surfaces (NDVI < 0.3) and a similar accuracy over non-barren surfaces (NDVI ≥ 0.3). BOA-LIN is more stable over varying water vapor conditions, compared to other hybrid methods. We conclude that this study provides a valuable reference for choosing the suitable estimation method in the SULR product generation. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop