Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = third-generation geostationary meteorological satellites (GEOs)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 4316 KB  
Article
Fire Monitoring Algorithm and Its Application on the Geo-Kompsat-2A Geostationary Meteorological Satellite
by Jie Chen, Wei Zheng, Shuang Wu, Cheng Liu and Hua Yan
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(11), 2655; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112655 - 1 Jun 2022
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 4739
Abstract
Geo-Kompsat-2A (GK-2A) is the third new-generation geostationary meteorological satellite that orbits Asia and monitors China and its surrounding areas, following the Himawari-8 and Fengyun-4A satellites. The nadir point positioning and satellite channel parameters of the GK-2A are better than those of the Himawari-8 [...] Read more.
Geo-Kompsat-2A (GK-2A) is the third new-generation geostationary meteorological satellite that orbits Asia and monitors China and its surrounding areas, following the Himawari-8 and Fengyun-4A satellites. The nadir point positioning and satellite channel parameters of the GK-2A are better than those of the Himawari-8 and FY-4A, which are more conducive to fire monitoring in China. In this study, a new fire detection algorithm is proposed based on GK-2A satellite data. That is, considering the large solar zenith angle correction for reflectance and the proportion information of background pixels in the existing spatial threshold method, fires under the different underlying surface types and solar radiation states can be automatically identified. Moreover, the accuracy of the Himawari-8 fire monitoring algorithm and the present algorithm of GK-2A is compared and analyzed through the ground truth fire spot data. The results show that compared with the original fire monitoring algorithm with fixed parameter thresholds, the brightness temperature difference of this algorithm is reduced by 0.55 K, and the correction coefficient is reduced by 0.6 times, the fire can be found earlier, and the monitoring sensitivity is improved. According to the practical fire case, the present fire monitoring algorithm of GK-2A has better monitoring accuracy than the fire monitoring algorithm of Himawari-8. The present fire monitoring algorithm of GK-2A can meet the fire monitoring requirements under different sun angles, different cloud cover ratios and vegetation ratios with good versatility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1721 KB  
Review
Toward More Integrated Utilizations of Geostationary Satellite Data for Disaster Management and Risk Mitigation
by Atsushi Higuchi
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(8), 1553; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081553 - 16 Apr 2021
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 7034
Abstract
Third-generation geostationary meteorological satellites (GEOs), such as Himawari-8/9 Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI), Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES)-R Series Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI), and Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Flexible Combined Imager (FCI), provide advanced imagery and atmospheric measurements of the Earth’s weather, oceans, and [...] Read more.
Third-generation geostationary meteorological satellites (GEOs), such as Himawari-8/9 Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI), Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES)-R Series Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI), and Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Flexible Combined Imager (FCI), provide advanced imagery and atmospheric measurements of the Earth’s weather, oceans, and terrestrial environments at high-frequency intervals. Third-generation GEOs also significantly improve capabilities by increasing the number of observation bands suitable for environmental change detection. This review focuses on the significantly enhanced contribution of third-generation GEOs for disaster monitoring and risk mitigation, focusing on atmospheric and terrestrial environment monitoring. In addition, to demonstrate the collaboration between GEOs and Low Earth orbit satellites (LEOs) as supporting information for fine-spatial-resolution observations required in the event of a disaster, the landfall of Typhoon No. 19 Hagibis in 2019, which caused tremendous damage to Japan, is used as a case study. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 5965 KB  
Article
Development and Intercomparison Study of an Atmospheric Motion Vector Retrieval Algorithm for GEO-KOMPSAT-2A
by Soo Min Oh, Régis Borde, Manuel Carranza and In-Chul Shin
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(17), 2054; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11172054 - 1 Sep 2019
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4854
Abstract
We derived an atmospheric motion vector (AMV) algorithm for the Geostationary Korea Multipurpose Satellite (GEO-KOMPSAT-2A; GK-2A) launched on 4 December 2018, using the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard Himawari-8, which is very similar to the Advanced Meteorological Imager onboard GK-2A. This study clearly [...] Read more.
We derived an atmospheric motion vector (AMV) algorithm for the Geostationary Korea Multipurpose Satellite (GEO-KOMPSAT-2A; GK-2A) launched on 4 December 2018, using the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard Himawari-8, which is very similar to the Advanced Meteorological Imager onboard GK-2A. This study clearly describes the main steps in our algorithm and optimizes it for the target box size and height assignment methods by comparing AMVs with numerical weather prediction (NWP) and rawinsonde profiles for July 2016 and January 2017. Target box size sensitivity tests were performed from 8 × 8 to 48 × 48 pixels for three infrared channels and from 16 × 16 to 96 × 96 pixels for one visible channel. The results show that the smaller box increases the speed, whereas the larger one slows the speed without quality control. The best target box sizes were found to be 16 × 16 for CH07, 08, and 13, and 48 × 48 pixels for CH03. Height assignment sensitivity tests were performed for several methods, such as the cross-correlation coefficient (CCC), equivalent blackbody temperature (EBBT), infrared/water vapor (IR/WV) intercept, and CO2 slicing methods for a cloudy target as well as normalized total contribution (NTC) and normalized total cumulative contribution (NTCC) for a clear-air target. For a cloudy target, the CCC method is influenced by the quality of the cloud’s top pressure. Better results were found when using EBBT and IR/WV intercept methods together rather than individually. Furthermore, CO2 slicing had the best statistics. For a clear-air target, the combined use of NTC and NTCC had the best statistics. Additionally, the mean vector difference, root-mean-square (RMS) vector difference, bias, and RMS error (RMSE) between GK-2A AMVs and NWP or rawinsonde were smaller by approximately 18.2% on average than in the case of the Communication, Ocean and Meteorology Satellite (COMS) AMVs. In addition, we verified the similarity between GK-2A and Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) AMVs using the AHI of Himawari-8 from 21 July 2016. This similarity can provide evidence that the GK-2A algorithm works properly because the GK-2A AMV algorithm borrows many methods of the MTG AMV algorithm for geostationary data and inversion layer corrections. The Pearson correlation coefficients in the speed, direction, and height of the prescribed GK-2A and MTG AMVs were larger than 0.97, and the corresponding bias/RMSE were0.07/2.19 m/s, 0.21/14.8°, and 2.61/62.9 hPa, respectively, considering common quality indicator with forecast (CQIF) > 80. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Satellite-Derived Wind Observations)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop