Search Results (5)

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical performance and optical quality of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), Asqelio™ EDOF (models ETLIO130C/ETPIO130C), in patients undergoing cataract surgery or refractive lensectomy. Methods: This prospective observational, case-control study included patients bilaterally implanted with either the Asqelio™ EDOF IOL (Study Group) or the spherical monofocal TECNIS^® 1-Piece ZCB00 IOL (Control Group). The postoperative outcomes—at 3 months after surgery—included visual acuities at multiple distances, refraction, contrast sensitivity, the optical scatter index (OSI), wavefront aberrations, and patient-reported outcomes (Catquest-9SF and a quality-of-vision questionnaire). Results: Twenty-three patients (46 eyes) in the Asqelio™ EDOF group and 17 patients (34 eyes) in the monofocal control group were enrolled. Postoperatively, 91% of eyes in the EDOF group were within ±0.50 D of the intended spherical equivalent. The binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities were 0.00 ± 0.09, 0.13 ± 0.12, and 0.32 ± 0.15 logMAR, respectively. Contrast sensitivity and OSI values were similar between the study and control groups (p > 0.05). Higher-order aberrations were significantly lower in the EDOF group (p < 0.001), but values in both groups were clinically low. No adverse events were reported. Most patients expressed high satisfaction and reported few visual disturbances. Conclusions: The Asqelio™ EDOF IOL provided good refractive predictability, effective uncorrected vision across distance and intermediate ranges, and high patient satisfaction. Contrast sensitivity and optical scatter were comparable to monofocal implants. This lens can be considered a valuable option for patients seeking an extended range of functional vision with minimal side effects. Full article

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of traditional vergence formulas with segmented axial length (AL) compared to traditional composite AL in extremely long eyes, and to determine whether the segmented AL can be extended to the new-generation formulas, including the Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 (EVO2), Hill-RBF 3.0 (Hill3), Kane, and Ladas Super formula (LSF) formulas in extremely long eyes. Setting: National Hospital. Organization, Tokyo Medical Center, Japan. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery implanted with a three-piece intraocular lens between December 2015 and March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The composite AL was measured with a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer using a mean refractive index. The segmented AL was calculated by summing the geometric lengths of the ocular segments (cornea, aqueous, lens, and vitreous) using multiple specific refractive indices based on the data obtained by the SS-OCT-based biometer. When refraction was measured at three months postoperatively, the median absolute errors (MedAEs) were calculated with two ALs for each formula. Results: The study included 31 eyes of 22 patients. The segmented AL (30.45 ± 1.23 mm) was significantly shorter than the composite AL (30.71 ± 1.28 mm, p < 0.001). The MedAEs were significantly reduced when using segmented AL for SRK/T, Haigis, Hill3, and LSF, compared to those obtained using composite AL (0.38 vs. 0.62, 0.48 vs. 0.79, 0.50 vs. 0.90, 0.34 vs. 0.61, p < 0.001 for all formulas, respectively). On the contrary, the MedAE obtained by Kane with segmented AL was significantly worse compared to the one with composite AL (0.35 vs. 0.27, p = 0.03). Conclusion: In extremely high myopic eyes, the segmented AL improves the performance of SRK/T, Haigis, Hill3, and LSF formulas compared to the composite AL, while the segmented AL worsens the prediction accuracy of the Kane formula. Full article

Purpose: To compare the refractive results between sutureless scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOLs) (Carlevale, Soleko) and suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOLs (Sensar AR40, Johnson & Johnson) for secondary implantation in patients with IOL dislocation or aphakia. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study on 28 patients (28 eyes) with sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale IOL and 25 patients (25 eyes) with suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOL. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) evaluation, refractive measures and IOL tilt evaluation with anterior segment optical coherence tomography were conducted at one, three, six and twelve months after surgery. Point Spread Function (PSF) was measured using a total ocular aberrometer. Results: BCVA in both groups improved since the postoperative visit at 1 month and reached a stable value at 3 months At month 12, mean BCVA was 0.23 logMAR in group one and 0.32 logMAR in group two. Mean IOL tilt angle at 12 months was 2.76° ± 1.87 in group one and 2.51° ± 1.80 in group two. PSF at 12 months was 0.18 ± 0.09 in group one and 0.15 ± 0.05 in group two. There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) for all comparisons. The post-operative complications were similar within the two groups. Conclusions: Our results show that secondary IOL implantation has similar visual and surgical outcomes when a sutureless Carlevale lens scleral fixation and a suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOL are used. Full article

We retrospectively compared the stability of intraocular lenses (IOLs) routinely used at our institution by measuring IOL position after phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Patients with RRD who underwent phacovitrectomy with gas tamponade received one of three IOLs: 6-mm, single-piece NS-60YG (NIDEK, 15 eyes); 6-mm, single-piece XY1 (HOYA, 11 eyes); or 7-mm, three-piece X-70 (Santen, 11 eyes). Various parameters associated with the anterior chamber, lens, and IOL were measured by swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2; Tomey Corp) before and 1 week and 1 month after surgery. IOL position was determined as follows: IOL position = (postoperative aqueous depth [AQD] − preoperative AQD)/lens thickness. We found no significant difference in axial length between the IOLs (p = 0.97). At 1 week, IOL position was as follows: NS-60YG, 0.32; XY1, 0.24; and X-70, 0.26 (p < 0.05). The respective IOL positions at 1 month were 0.35, 0.27, and 0.28 (p < 0.01). These results indicated the smallest anterior shift with NS-60YG. To replicate the anterior shift of IOL position ex vivo, biomechanical measurement was performed. NS-60YG resisted more displacement force than the other IOLs. Thus, in eyes undergoing phacovitrectomy for RRD, NS-60YG was the most stable of the three IOLs studied. Full article

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the impact of different sharp-edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) (hydrophobic acrylic or silicone) on posterior and anterior lens capsule opacification (PCO and ACO) at 3-year postoperative follow-up.
Material and Methods. A total of 96 eyes (89 patients) having a standard uncomplicated phacoemulsification procedure for age-related cataract were included in a prospective clinical study: 34 eyes with a 3-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, MA3OBA), 32 eyes with a 1-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, SA3OAL), and 30 eyes with a 3-piece silicone (CeeOn 911A) IOL. Visual acuity, capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping, ACO and PCO (using EPCO2000 system) were evaluated at 3-year follow-up. Capsulotomies performed by means of neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser were recorded.
Results. Three years after surgery, the grade of ACO of the capsulorrhexis rim area and the capsule/optic area was significantly greater in the silicone IOL group than in the acrylic IOL groups (P<0.05). During 3 postoperative years, there were no significant differences in the PCO values either in the entire IOL optic area or in the central 3-mm optic zone comparing the groups. Three years after surgery, 9% of eyes with a 3-piece acrylic IOL, 3.1% of eyes with a 1-piece acrylic IOL, and no case in the silicone IOL group had Nd:YAG capsulotomy (P>0.05).
Conclusion. The 3-year follow-up after cataract surgery showed no difference in PCO development (EPCO2000) between acrylic hydrophobic and silicone sharp-edged IOLs. However, the need for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy was higher in the acrylic IOL groups than the silicone IOL group, though the difference was not significant. ACO was greatest in the eyes with 3-piece silicone IOLs Full article