Testimonials
What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
We have published several works in Polymers within the last 2 years, and each time we have had a great publishing experience because Polymers is highly ranked, has a great
[...] Read more.
We have published several works in Polymers within the last 2 years, and each time we have had a great publishing experience because Polymers is highly ranked, has a great reputation, and, most importantly, has a good reviewing process and a fast response during the submission process. Therefore, I'm satisfied that the review process didn't make submissions difficult with over-criticism, but the feedback from the peer review process was good. Another success of Polymers is that its Special Issues on specific topics that are highly relevant. These Special Issues are highly reader-focused and of course increase the citation rates and benefit researchers. I would definitely recommend Polymers to all my colleagues as they publish their future research.
Article in Polymers:
Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
Less
I have had the good fortune of publishing seven papers in Polymers over the past three years. The most impressive thing is that the easy communication with the editorial staff.
[...] Read more.
I have had the good fortune of publishing seven papers in Polymers over the past three years. The most impressive thing is that the easy communication with the editorial staff. The editorial team is always very fast in responding to my concerns. I highly appreciate the editorial staff for their hard work and valuablre efforts.
Article in Polymers:
Polymer-Based Nanofiber–Nanoparticle Hybrids and Their Medical Applications
Less
This was my first experience of publishing in a Special Issue of the journal Polymers, and it was a pleasant one. I would like to thank the editorial staff
[...] Read more.
This was my first experience of publishing in a Special Issue of the journal Polymers, and it was a pleasant one. I would like to thank the editorial staff and reviewers for the corrections made to the manuscript and its improvements. The whole process was efficient, fast, and favorable. The manuscript submission system is quite clear and simple. We appreciate it very much and will definitely continue to cooperate. I am happy to recommend this prestigious journal for the publishing of papers on polymer science.
Article in Polymers:
Comparative Characterization and Identification of Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate Producing Bacteria with Subsequent Optimization of Polymer Yield
Less
Our experience with the open-access publishing procedure of Polymers has been excellent. We appreciate the feedback provided by the editors and reviewers, which has helped to improve our manuscript. Thank
[...] Read more.
Our experience with the open-access publishing procedure of Polymers has been excellent. We appreciate the feedback provided by the editors and reviewers, which has helped to improve our manuscript. Thank you to the entire journal's editorial team for their dedication, time, and support during the publishing process. The journal Polymers is highly recommended.
Article in Polymers:
Development of a Multi-Criteria Design Optimization Methodology for Automotive Plastics Parts
Less
Publishing articles in Polymers has been a very pleasant experience, and we all appreciate the editors and reviewers who spent time on improving this manuscript. What impressed me is the
[...] Read more.
Publishing articles in Polymers has been a very pleasant experience, and we all appreciate the editors and reviewers who spent time on improving this manuscript. What impressed me is the enthusiasm and efficiency of the editors and the professionalism and responsibility of the reviewers. The whole publishing process was very fast. We will continue to submit papers in the future.
Article in Polymers:
Preparation of PVA–CS/SA–Ca2+ Hydrogel with Core–Shell Structure
Less
This was the second manuscript sent to MDPI but the first to Polymers. Throughout the publication process (which included receiving the invitation indicating the Special Issue appropriate to the
[...] Read more.
This was the second manuscript sent to MDPI but the first to Polymers. Throughout the publication process (which included receiving the invitation indicating the Special Issue appropriate to the profile of our research, as well as reviewing and correcting the final form of the manuscript) we received professional support of the editorial team. The revision of the manuscript (from submission to online publication) lasted a month, and the competence and rigor of the reviewers allowed the manuscript to be improved from original form. We thank the editorial board for their work, involvement, and handling of the manuscript.
Article in Polymers:
Comparison between Tests and Simulations Regarding Bending Resistance of 3D Printed PLA Structures
Less
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editors and reviewers who were involved in ensure the publication of this paper and ensured its success. This is my
[...] Read more.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editors and reviewers who were involved in ensure the publication of this paper and ensured its success. This is my first paper with Polymers, and my submission experience with them has been splendid, with the editors providing a large amount of on-time assistance and communication. The entire process from submission to online publication of my paper was completed in less than 2 months, which sets a very high standard for other journals to follow. I would highly recommend other authors with suitable papers to consider Polymers due to its high standard and quality.
Article in Polymers:
Rapid Ultrasound-Assisted Starch Extraction from Sago Pith Waste (SPW) for the Fabrication of Sustainable Bioplastic Film
Less
We recently published a paper in a Special Issue entitled “Multifunctional Natural-Based Polymers for Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine”. The journey of publishing our manuscript was surprisingly smooth, fast, and
[...] Read more.
We recently published a paper in a Special Issue entitled “Multifunctional Natural-Based Polymers for Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine”. The journey of publishing our manuscript was surprisingly smooth, fast, and efficient. Their editorial teams were highly efficient and professional. Reviewers provided relevant reviews that improved our manuscripts for the better. We will consider this journal for our future submissions. Additionally, we highly recommended this journal for publication.
Article in Polymers:
Modelling of Stem Cells Microenvironment Using Carbon-Based Scaffold for Tissue Engineering Application—A Review
Less
Initially I was skeptical about publishing in an MDPI journal due to their APC, as we come from a small place and a developing country, but after sending our abstract
[...] Read more.
Initially I was skeptical about publishing in an MDPI journal due to their APC, as we come from a small place and a developing country, but after sending our abstract to them, they offered some discount on APC which we were able to arrange. When we submitted our manuscript, they began the process so fast, and as soon we received the reviewer's reports, and they gave us only few days to revise our manuscript and to reply to the reviewer's comments. Our manuscript went through three rounds of revisions every time, the processing was really fast, they responded quickly and cooperated very well. Overall, the whole process was quite satisfactory, they have a very good and cooperative team. Thank you for everything. We will be happy to continue this collaboration in future.
Article in Insects:
Drosophila melanogaster Chemosensory Pathways as Potential Targets to Curb the Insect Menace
Less
The very first, but the best experience in scientific publishing. The overall process is very professionally organized and performed. Contact is continuously kept throughout the process. The reviewers were very
[...] Read more.
The very first, but the best experience in scientific publishing. The overall process is very professionally organized and performed. Contact is continuously kept throughout the process. The reviewers were very professional and precise, with grounded advice for re-arrangement/improvements; every remark corresponded to the quality of the article, and every remark should be commented on/answered for the respective viewers. Quickly received reviews (within 3 weeks) let you stay on-pulse with your research and article manuscript, so corrections are much easier to carry out. In contrast, when you receive reviews after half a year or even longer, and look at your already old data to make re-arrangements, it feels like starting from the beginning of the analysis again. Very professional proofreading service. Best experiences. Thanks to all of the huge team once again!
Article in Energies:
Evolution of Short Food Supply Chain Theory and Practice: Two-Sided Networks and Platforms
Less
I am concerned with the accusations of MDPI journals being "predatory". I have never experienced anything that would signal that the Viruses or Diagnostics journals are anything but reputable, efficient
[...] Read more.
I am concerned with the accusations of MDPI journals being "predatory". I have never experienced anything that would signal that the Viruses or Diagnostics journals are anything but reputable, efficient and similar to other high-quality journals.
Article in Diagnostics:
Implementation of a Rapid RT-LAMP Saliva-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing Program in the Workplace
Less
Displaying testimonial 401-420 on page 21 of 65.