Testimonials

What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
 

“According to our experience the peer-review process was substantially fast yet reviewers’ comments were reasonable and helped to shape better the manuscript. The editorial staff provided us fair support, where [...] Read more.

“I was quite impressed by my interactions with Life on the special Archaea issue. The reviews were quick, fair and obviously from experts in the field whose input helped to [...] Read more.

“The peer review process was very fast. We were all positively surprised. We were very happy with the reviewers’ suggestions; they were clearly experts in the field, and helped us [...] Read more.

“The peer review process was of a very high quality and fast. It considerably improved our article. The reviewers were objective and raised very good criticisms. The Guest Editor was [...] Read more.

“This really was the peer-review all of us would like: fast, knowledgeable and fair. The review process improved the paper (which, sad to say, is not always the case). Another [...] Read more.

“For several decades (some) central dogma(s) dominated biology and life sciences that are falsified meanwhile, such as (i) DNA-RNA-Protein-anything else, (ii) one gene - one protein, (iii) non-coding DNA is [...] Read more.

“The peer-review process was exceedingly fast, the fastest I have ever experienced. All of my interactions with the editorial staff and guest editors were professional and highly satisfactory. The reviewers’ [...] Read more.

“I am really satisfied with the publication process provided at MDPI. It takes short time to be published, but under improved quality of the manuscript due to the relevant and [...] Read more.

“I am thankful for all MDPI group, especially for the Editor, for fast responses and all information that allowed to publish an article fast. I would recommend the Water journal [...] Read more.

“MDPI is my future research publication choice due to its fast service and quality of publication. The only problem is the article processing charge. This is typically important if there [...] Read more.

“The efficient process of publishing at MDPI includes detailed English feedback and a clear review process that both were very helpful for me as an early career researcher. ” [...] Read more.

“My experience with the MDPI is unbeatable. It has always been satisfactory. This is my reference editor for the publication of my studies. Its editorial excellence and relevance of its [...] Read more.

“This is my first time to publish through MDPI (Social Sciences). I really appreciate the professional support from the editors.” [...] Read more.

“Simple, effective, fast and with the proper attention to the most relevant details. Exactly as it should be.” [...] Read more.

“I am very grateful to the magazine and the entire editorial staff. The staff assisted every stage. Of all the magazines in which I have published articles, Materials had the [...] Read more.

“Oh behalf of all co-authors I wish to thank the editorial team and personally our assigned manager Mason Ma for considerate and caring attitude towards our manuscript. We got immediate [...] Read more.

“The reviewer comments were detailed and fast. The publication speed was fast.” [...] Read more.

“I am delighted to work with MDPI. Reliable and very detailed reviews allow you to improve the manuscript and develop new papers. Quick answers motivate you to work intensively. The [...] Read more.

“The publication process is very professional and helps to greatly improve the published manuscript.” [...] Read more.

“MDPI's manuscript processing speed ensures the rapid publication of articles, which enables me to get timely feedback from reviewers and readers in the research, and plays a positive role in [...] Read more.

Displaying testimonial 1081-1100 on page 55 of 65.
Back to TopTop