The Interreligious Dialogue: Philosophical Perspectives

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 1285

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Università degli Studi di Macerata, 62100 Marche, Italy
Interests: phenomenology; hermeneutics; philosophy of religion; translation studies; intercultural hermeneutics and interreligious relations

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí 78000, Mexico
Interests: phenomenology; hermeneutics; philosophy of religion; translation studies; intercultural studies; peace studies; interreligious and intercultural dialogue; philosophy of social sciences

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will explore the possibility of philosophical reflections dedicated to the Constitution and the dynamic of interreligious dialogue. We all know that establishing a possible dialogue between the different religious traditions constitutes a challenge to the declaration of uniqueness that every religion carries with it. This Special Issue focuses on the possibility of philosophically elaborating the basis and the grammar of this challenge to save the value of the absolute and the human at the same time.

In the philosophy of religion, various philosophical currents have tried to elaborate on this possibility, starting from the Middle Ages through a reflection of a metaphysical nature, passing through modernity (in which the problem has taken a rationalist mode), up to the contemporary era where currents such as phenomenology and hermeneutics have attempted to approach the question of the sacred in such a way as to provide a philosophical basis for reflections of a theological nature.

Indeed, the philosophical attention paid to the dimension of interreligious dialogue can contribute to a more solid foundation of communication between positions that are exclusive. The philosophical penetration of the conditions of the validity of the religious phenomenon, in general, and of some traditions, in particular, can precisely allow for the recovery of common humanity and, at the same time, bring to light the close link between the religious and ethical dimensions (also taking into account current progress in the theory of interculturality).

For these reasons, we invite articles that can shed light on the problematic configuration of intercultural and interreligious dialogue from a philosophical perspective. While we are open to various positions and approaches, we expect each author to articulate their approach, including their stance in philosophy, any assumptions they hold, and their conceptual framework in studying the dialogue between different religions. Articles can focus on reflective analysis of one’s approach itself or other authors’ approaches.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Carla Canullo
Prof. Dr. Stefano Santasilia
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religious experience
  • hermeneutics of religious experience
  • phenomenology of religion
  • theory of intercultural dialogue
  • intercultural studies
  • interreligious studies

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 432 KiB  
Article
From Understanding Śūnyatā to Connecting It with the Tathāgatagarbha: The Emergence and Evolution of Sengzhao’s Emptiness of the Nonabsolute
by Benhua Yang
Religions 2024, 15(5), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050588 - 11 May 2024
Viewed by 635
Abstract
Historical transmission and other controversies related to Sengzhao’s Things Do Not Shift have long been a subject of scholarly attention. However, his essay Emptiness of the Nonabsolute has been insufficiently studied, despite being traditionally deemed emblematic of the Chinese understanding of Mādhyamaka philosophy. [...] Read more.
Historical transmission and other controversies related to Sengzhao’s Things Do Not Shift have long been a subject of scholarly attention. However, his essay Emptiness of the Nonabsolute has been insufficiently studied, despite being traditionally deemed emblematic of the Chinese understanding of Mādhyamaka philosophy. The present study shows that this essay has also historically generated divisions and debates in the Chinese context. It finds that Emptiness of the Nonabsolute expresses the Mādhyamaka philosophy of emptiness in a distinctly Chinese manner by grounding itself in the principle of dependent origination, and by transforming issues of being and nonbeing and the name and the “thing-in-itself” into conditional emergence. Nevertheless, Sengzhao’s essay evoked the two markedly distinct construals of Buzhengukong 不真故空 and Bushizhenkong 不是真空 as Tathāgatagarbha and Buddha-nature philosophy within Chinese Buddhism. Bushizhenkong directly aligned Sengzhao’s ostensibly representative theory of Mādhyamaka emptiness in China with the doctrinal framework of Tathāgatagarbha and Buddha-nature, triggering almost a millennium-long period of discussions and controversies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interreligious Dialogue: Philosophical Perspectives)
Back to TopTop