Next Article in Journal
Designing an Attractive Metaverse: Research on Design Factors Influencing Audience Satisfaction with a Virtual Space Based on QCA
Next Article in Special Issue
How Does Anxiety Affect the Relationship between the Customer and the Omnichannel Systems?
Previous Article in Journal
Strategy Analysis of Multi-Agent Governance on the E-Commerce Platform
Previous Article in Special Issue
Location Optimization of Offline Physical Stores Based on MNL Model under BOPS Omnichannel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multi-Channel and Omni-Channel Retailing in the Scientific Literature: A Text Mining Approach

by
Claudiu Cicea
,
Corina Marinescu
* and
Cristian Silviu Banacu
Faculty of Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18(1), 19-36; https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010002
Submission received: 30 October 2022 / Revised: 11 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-Channel Retail and Its Applications in the Future of E-Commerce)

Abstract

:
Electronic commerce appeared as a new way of managing businesses in the digital era. However, it has also been accelerated by the recent pandemic situation. Retailers had to find new strategies of reaching customers in the online environment. Thus, concepts such as multi-channel and omni-channel retailing have gained the attention of both retailers and researchers in this field. This paper aims at using a text-mining approach in order to reveal the researchers focus on this theme in a period that also precedes and covers the COVID-19 pandemic. The research methodology follows five steps that are necessary in order to obtain a relevant collection of documents that will further provide the content to be analyzed. These steps refer to: (1) Creating the database of documents for analysis purposes; (2) identifying geographic areas for separating the collection’s documents; (3) framing a thematic dictionary of descriptors; (4) exploring the text using text mining approach; and (5) correspondence analysis. The discussion of the main findings is constructed starting with the geographic and the temporal distribution of documents and the design of a thematic dictionary of descriptors. Then, exploring the content of the documents provides information on the frequency of descriptors and reveals clusters of descriptors along with a link analysis. All of them are presented separately on geographic regions. Finally, the correspondence analysis of descriptors versus years provides the proximity maps and reveals the preferred topics and less approached themes. Among the main findings, one can highlight: (1) The greatest contributor in terms of documents related to the theme of interest is the United States; (2) a higher number of connections (and stronger) among descriptors for America as compared to the other two regions; (3) some categories of descriptors are specific to a particular year, which means that there are different themes under the researchers lens depending on the period; (4) the most frequently used descriptors are included in the following categories from the dictionary: Online retail environment and Consumer behavior, regardless of the region. In the end of this paper, research limitations and guidelines for future research are elaborated.

1. Introduction

The retail industry is the third largest industry in the world, after the financial industry and real estate [1]. It has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with serious impact on the economy and on the consumers’ lifestyle and shopping experiences. Face to face purchasing activities in store were limited, so online shopping has rapidly been embraced by customers complying with restrictions and seeking to remain healthy. At the same time, digital technologies burst to support remote working as well as for online purchasing. The digital transformation occurred at first as a response for informational advances and rapid data processing needs; afterwards it appeared as a call and response to the businesses need for new types of operations (necessary to deal out with stock issues, social distance aspects, contactless services and others) [2,3]. Old businesses had to choose between permanently closing or finding a new business model based on electronic commerce or e-commerce. This led to online shopping and online retailing as two concepts boosting from a paradigm generated by the COVID-19 pandemic. They both refer to a form of electronic commerce. E-commerce accounted for around 12.2% in the global retail sales before the pandemic situation and is expected to double until 2024 [4]. As a consequence of this rare phenomena in the economy, the role, determinants and success factors for the rapid growth of SMEs in e-commerce are discussed in the literature [5,6,7,8]. Further, the retail environment itself changed a lot, intensifying retailers’ efforts to reach customers, by choosing a channel strategy. There are so many challenges encountered when trying to build a successful and sustainable channel strategy [9,10,11,12]. In the literature, one can distinguish between single channel, multi-channel and omni-channel retailing. All three concepts will be further defined and explained. Multi-channel and omni-channel retailing represent the focus of our paper. To understand how the research related to them evolved before and during the pandemic, we aim to develop an exploratory study to find differences and similarities across the world. The main aim of the paper is to map the scientific production related to the multi-channel and omni-channel concepts in order to discover some connections between them, as well as possible patterns and tendencies of the researchers in this scientific area. In order to analyze the coverage of this theme in the scientific literature, a text-mining approach has been adopted, which will imply information extraction from unstructured text, natural language processing, semantic clustering and visualization of the results.
The paper is structured as follows: The next section represents a review of the literature in order to discover what is known to be related to the topic. The third section (“Methodology”) presents the main phases of the research design. In the fourth section (“Results and discussion”) we will present the main findings of the research, while the last section (“Conclusions”) provides a brief summary of the results, main limitations of the research and direction for future research.

2. Literature Review

As multi-channel and omni-channel represent the main points of interest in our paper, we will further try to highlight some defining features and use the following suggestive figure (Figure 1) to compare them.
Multichannel retailing means a multitude of channels through which a customer is attracted to buy a certain product or service, and equally, a seller manages to capitalize on the same product or service by selling it on the market. In general, these channels, which form the multichannel domain, are made up of traditional stores, websites specialized in the sale of products, email and social media platforms, and others. The main feature of multichannel retailing is that these channels are acting independently, without interfering with one another. This gives some simplicity to this type of retailing and ease of monitoring.
Regarding the other concept, omni-channel retailing implies a combined action of all channels within a single platform. Within this platform, each channel “sees” what the other channels are doing and can adjust its policy and strategy accordingly. Omni-channel retail implies a unified vision of the process of capitalizing on the market of a product or service, having a higher complexity than the other form represented by multichannel. In this way, a synergistic effect of all the channels that contribute to the valorization of the product or service on the market is obtained. Unlike multichannel retail, this form requires cooperation between the online and offline environments. Moreover, this form of retail manifestation was initially named (around 2010) “bricks and clicks” retail [15], representing exactly that symbiosis between the traditional store (with classic walls) and the online store (existing in the virtual environment), and was specific mainly to young people who have this ability of using multiple channels for shopping [16]. What is very important to emphasize is that omni-channel enables cross-channel purchase for a customer. From this perspective, cross-channel represents the experience of a customer who can use different channels in order to buy a product (e.g., a customer discover a product on a TV commercial and then goes to the shop to make the purchase).
Analyzing the previous figure, we can observe that, in the case of the multichannel retail system, the channels act independently of each other, with the ultimate goal of getting the consumer (customer) to purchase a certain product or service. However, the omni-channel retail system involves the combined action of all channels in order to achieve the same objective. For this purpose, the channels communicate and cooperate with each other, which involves a higher level of complexity compared to the multichannel system.
In relation to these two concepts, researchers developed studies to treat a variety of topics. Table 1 manages to present the most representative papers according to the Web of Science database (these papers managed to gather the highest number of citations since their publication). The search that returned these papers is the same as the one used in the first step of the present analysis. The search required a specific query, which will be detailed in the next section and a specific filtering related to language (only English written documents were kept) and to the type of documents (only articles and review articles were selected).

3. Methodology

This type of research implies establishing a rigorous framework, constructed in a logical manner, so that it eases achieving the objective. In this regard, following similar recent research [51,52], the next five steps are used to design the methodology:
Step 1. Creating the database of documents for analysis purposes
This first step requires selecting the database that will generate a collection of documents having treated the theme of multichannel and omni-channel retailing as related to electronic commerce and online shopping. We chose the Web of Science database over others that we could have used for a variety of reasons (it contains great amount of quality papers written by top reputed scholars in the field [52,53]; it is one of the most well-known database for indexing documents and among the most widely used by researchers [54]; it provides access to thousands of journals from around the world and from prestigious international publishers [54]).
Using the search engine of the Web of Science database, the next query was used by the authors in order to obtain relevant documents (TS represents the syntax for “topic search” in Web of Science database):
(TS = “multichannel* retail*” or TS = “multi-channel* retail*” or TS = “omnichannel* retail*” or TS = “omni-channel* retail*”) AND (TS = “e-commerce” or TS = “electronic commerce” or TS = “mobile commerce” or TS = “online shopping” or TS = “online market” or TS = “electronic market” or TS = “online retailing”)
After the search was performed and refined, 177 documents were identified. The refinements refer to keeping in the collection of only documents written in English and only two specific types of documents: Articles and review articles (as there is a difficulty in obtaining papers from conference proceedings and book chapters). However, downloading all of them was not possible (some of them were not relevant for the research theme). Thus, in the end, the bibliographic information was only retrieved for 174 documents.
Step 2. Identifying geographic areas for separating the collection’s documents
This step starts with separating documents in accordance with a geographic area (Asia, Australia, Europe, America and Africa) as a result of the corresponding author’s affiliation. In this way, the next phases of the analysis will reflect specific aspects depending on the documents’ distribution on different regions. A temporal spread of the documents separated on regions can be emphasized here in order to reveal each period’s focus of the researchers in this field.
Step 3. Framing a thematic dictionary of descriptors
In order to design the thematic dictionary, a content analysis software (QDA miner [55]) will be used. This software facilitates the text analysis and also helps to obtain variate graphical elements, which enables visual understanding of the descriptors. A descriptor is a keyword found either in the title, abstract, or among keywords within the text. The most important things for a word (or a group of words) to become a descriptor is its significance related to the topic and its frequency (e.g., descriptors such as ”online retail environment”, “omni-channel retail” or “multi-channel retail” are very important for the analyzed topic; also, descriptors like “theoretical models and studies”, “place” or “price” have a very high frequency, namely 534, 468 and 761, respectively). After a panel discussion between all the authors, the descriptors are manually grouped and so the thematic categories of descriptors appear (e.g., descriptors like “product”, “price”, “promotion and distribution” or “place” has been manually assigned to the “marketing mix” thematic category). In this way, we can create a thematic keyword’s map, which can cover the whole topic with several categories of descriptors and with many descriptors inside each of them [56].
Step 4. Exploring the text (text mining approach)
This step comprises three sub phases, which are briefly described below. The choice of presenting them as sub phases of a single step is the authors’ choice based on:
Presenting descriptors’ frequency of occurrence. This refers to the absolute and relative values of the frequency of occurrence for each category of descriptors included in the dictionary, along with the number of documents containing them;
Grouping descriptors on clusters. This sub phase pays attention to arranging in groups, descriptors which are found in the same context or in similar ones. The clusters are graphically represented with different colors.
Link analysis. This refers to highlighting connections among descriptors and finding the strength of those links, by using the Jaccard coefficient.
Step 5. Correspondence analysis
Correspondence analysis (CA) is an investigation tool to find out and visualize the potential relationship between two different categories (if there are many categories, then we are talking about multiple correspondence analyses). In a specific scientific topic, CA can be only used when we can identify two dimensions of the same phenomena/processes/variable (e.g., product and location for purchase in market research or disease and treatment in healthcare area) [57].
A correspondence analysis uses a table (with just 2 dimensions), and in each cell there is the frequency that indicates how variable 1 (from the columns) distribute variable 2 (from the lines). This method is very useful for visualization of the table (known as the contingency table) using a suggestive map, in which the position of all points and the distance between them have a specific interpretation [58]. Hence, correspondence analysis is a very powerful tool to analyze the connection/relationship between two variables, especially in social science.
From a text mining perspective, the correspondence analysis is a method used to find similarities or differences for descriptors and plotting them in a proximity map along with some characteristics (years or journals). This is a common method used in review articles treating a wide range of themes [59,60,61,62].

4. Results and Discussion

According to the methodological steps, after selecting all documents, as explained in the previous section, and taking into account the affiliation of the corresponding author, the 174 documents are divided into geographic areas. For South Africa, only one article was reported, so we chose not to include it in a separate region. Australia was aligned to Asia as it reported only four documents. Figure 2 comprises three geographic areas and the documents’ distribution on each country included in those areas.
As one can observe, the United States holds the greatest share in terms of published documents on omni-channel and multichannel in the online environment. China comes next with a share of 14.9% and then the United Kingdom with 8.6%, followed by India and Germany, each of them with 6.3%. These means that only five countries gather more than half of the scientific research published on the concerned theme (around 57.4% of the collection’s documents). As a region, Europe accounts for 38.8% of the published documents, followed by Asia with 34.3%.
After separating documents into regions, we managed to arrange them on a time axis in order to highlight the temporal distribution. The diagram in Figure 3 shows a ten-year period from 2001 to 2011 with little focus on the theme of interest. However, around 2012, there is a remarkable effort from researchers, belonging mainly to the America region. The research documents begin to spread on the diagram from all three regions, increasing gradually from one period to another.
To move on in our analysis, the categories of descriptors from the dictionary will be further presented. The keywords included in each descriptor category were obtained after studying the list of frequencies generated by QDA Miner for words extracted from each document’s content. Thus, different keywords were retained and thematically grouped on descriptors. Then, two or more descriptors joined one of the seven categories of descriptors: Client, Economic features, Market, Marketing mix, Research and Analysis, Types of channels retailing, and Types of retail environment. Thus, the dictionary contains 22 descriptors grouped into seven categories.
After completing the third step of the methodology, we managed to frame the thematic dictionary of descriptors, which are further presented in Figure 4.
For a more specific presentation, the seven categories of descriptors will refer to each of the three concerned regions, and highlight diverse aspects regarding frequency, number of cases (documents in which they are found) and the TF-IDF value, which is an abbreviation of the Term Frequency weighted by the Inverse Document Frequency (see Table 2). According to some authors [63,64], this metric is able to identify important words (in the sense that they appear so many times in a document that they become representative for that content) and weighting them with the number of documents containing those words.
For each region, the clusters of descriptors could be identified. Figure 5 is relevant in this regard. It presents clusters of descriptors for each region, and it shows the way the content is distributed within each region. As one can observe, for America there is a large cluster, designed in green, grouping four categories of descriptors, while red, blue or purple are cluster groupings with more delimited themes. Each descriptor has a hexagonal representation and becomes a node in a cluster. Its size depends on its frequency. The distance among them reveals the tendency to occur in the same text. It can be said that the green cluster dominates the map, gathering mainly themes that refer to the following categories: Type of retail environment, Marketing mix, Type of channels retail and Economic features.
Dominant clusters also appear in the European and Asian and Australia conceptual maps (Figure 5b,c), both designed in red. However, the distances among nodes in these clusters as compared to the dominant green cluster in America, are larger.
Moving forward to the link analysis, Figure 6 facilitates understanding of the connections between clustered descriptors, separately for each region. Visually, the most powerful links are signaled in red and they appear for values over 0.1 for the Jaccard’s coefficient. Each node (descriptor) is plotted given its relative co-occurrence. For instance, for the first region, America, the strongest connections appear around nodes referring to specific descriptors from the following categories: Economic features, Types of channel retail and Client. Documents containing these types of descriptors are characterized by a relatively high level of similarity.
However, all three maps are revealing nodes that could not establish a connection with a neighboring node. At the same time, there are several unilateral ties, specific to maps for Europe and America. For instance, in America, topics related to Management and strategies—Promotion and Distribution, or to Supply and Demand—Place, or to the Economic features category (Marketing—Social issues) are describing topics of discussion in several documents.
Furthermore, these network maps show that there are nodes creating closed triadic configurations, which in fact may indicate possible topics of discussion in the studied documents. As an example, for Europe, there is such a triadic configuration (which contains the strongest links of the map) plotted among the Online retail environment (ORE), Physical retail environment (PRE) and Consumer behavior (C_B).
The last part of our analysis is referring to the correspondence analysis, graphically represented in the next correspondence maps (or proximity maps), for each of the three regions. They gather information on the descriptors’ categories spread along the two axes and on the proximity of a descriptor to the year of publication for documents containing it.
One can observe from Figure 7 that the categories of descriptors spread differently depending on each region. For instance, the first map, for America, reveals the fact that research on the Types of channels retail is specific to 2013, while categories of keywords such as Market and Research and Analysis dominate the 2017 year. Years 2008, 2009, 2011 have in their proximity descriptors from Client and Type of retail environment categories.
Maps for Europe and Asia and Australia include categories of descriptors located far from a specific year, and even farther from the center of the map. They are called highly discriminating descriptors and such an item is Client in both maps, for Europe, Asia and Australia.
If comparing all three maps, a major discrepancy appears in the one for Europe, where several years concentrate near the center of the map. The closer they are on the plot, the more similar they seem in terms of treated themes on the research of interest.

5. Conclusions

This study aimed to study the main flow of the scientific literature in terms of omni-channel and multi-channel retailing in order to design the landscape of online retailing driven by both the digital transformation and pandemic related constraints.
This research adopted an approach based on text mining to analyze the coverage of the interest concepts (omni-channel and multi-channel retail) in the scientific literature. The main outputs of the research are: A dictionary of descriptors, clusters maps, network maps and proximity maps. Each of those outputs contribute to all the results’ visualization and to an overview contouring on the concepts followed in this research.
The results were grouped and presented on three regions (Europe, America and Asia and Australia). Among the main findings, the following are self-evident (as visually supported by the graphical representations): (1) United States holds the greatest share in terms of published documents on omni-channel and multichannel in the online environment; (2) there is a higher number of connections (and stronger according to the eigenvalues on the network maps) between descriptors revealed for America as compared to the other two regions; (3) there is a different spread of descriptors and proximity with years of publication, which depends on each region. For instance, the category Types of channel retail is specific to 2013 for America, while Europe appears as being characteristic to 2002, and for Asia and Australia more specific to 2019; (4) the most frequently used descriptors are included in the: Online retail environment (ORE) and Consumer behavior (C_B) regardless the region.
A major benefit of this research is to better understand the relationship of interdependence between the concepts of omni-channel and multichannel, within the scientific production of researchers and experts. In the current context of the acceleration of the pace of promotion for the technical progress (which leads to a reduction of the life cycle for the vast majority of products, especially those that incorporate cutting-edge technology), it is very useful to know what type of promotion/sales channels can be used, in such a way that the consumer is determined to purchase a certain good or service as quickly as possible. From this perspective, it is very useful to understand the connections that are formed between various terms based on the resulting clusters and the fact that any change in a descriptor (e.g., “price”) can generate changes both within the cluster of which this descriptor is a part, but also for other descriptors with which it has strong connections.
At the same time, observing the rapid increase in the number of articles that analyze these two concepts in recent years (evolution suggestively presented in Figure 3) we can conclude that the importance of the analyzed topic and, implicitly, its influence on the products and services on the market, will be more and more accentuated in the next period.
From another perspective, according to the authors’ knowledge, it is the first study that performs a text mining analysis in this very important field of economic life. Moreover, it is for the first time that a comparative analysis is carried out between three major geographical areas (North America, Europe, Asia and Australia), regarding the scientific production for omni-channel and multichannel topic. This comparative analysis highlights the particularities of each geographical area, generated by the economic culture, the economic-social conditionality, the historical, political characteristics, etc.
The main limitation of this study is related to the source of data. More specifically it refers to using one chosen database for extracting bibliographic information and to the complexity of using two or more at the same time. Another limitation refers to the type of analyzed document (in this case we are talking about article and review). Other types of documents (that also define scientific production, namely books, book chapters, conference papers, etc.) were not taken into account (all of them can be the subject of future research). Finally, the third limitation concerns the software used (QDA Miner) that can only perform certain types of analysis and generate certain types of reports. Finally, we appreciate that all these limitations are not able to affect the validity of the results obtained.
Our research has implications for both researchers and scholars, as it offers an overview, as seen in the scientific literature, on these two concepts, of multi-channel and omni-channel retailing and creates premises for future research. The knowledge related to those two concepts can be increased by using meta-analysis instead of a systematic review for more integrative research. Studying in depth transitions between these two forms of multi-channel and omni-channel retailing would also represent a new research topic. All in all, this theme contributes to the knowledge regarding future digital transformation of retailing from a multichannel view and opens new paths for shaping the future of multichannel retailing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors.; methodology, C.C. and C.M.; project administration, all authors; software, C.C.; validation, C.C. and C.M.; formal analysis, C.C., C.M. and C.S.B.; resources, C.C. and C.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C. and C.S.B.; writing—review and editing, C.C. and C.M.; supervision, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wealthwave—What’s the Biggest Industry in the World. Available online: https://wealthwave.com/anthonystephens/blog/the-biggest-industry-in-the-world (accessed on 14 September 2022).
  2. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Ștefănescu, R.; Ionescu, L.; Cocoșatu, M. Neuromanagement decision-making and cognitive algorithmic processes in the technological adoption of mobile commerce apps. Oeconomia Copernic. 2021, 12, 1033–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abeam Consulting—The Impact of COVID-19 on the Retail Industry and the Next Actions to be Taken. Available online: https://www.abeam.com/vn/en/topics/insights/covid19_retail (accessed on 14 September 2022).
  4. International Trade Administration—Impact of COVID Pandemic on eCommerce. Available online: https://www.trade.gov/impact-covid-pandemic-ecommerce (accessed on 14 September 2022).
  5. Chen, M.; Bashir, R. Role of e-commerce and resource utilization for sustainable business development: Goal of economic recovery after COVID-19. Econ. Chang. Restruct. 2022, 55, 2663–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fariselli, P.; Oughton, C.; Picory, C.; Sugden, R. Electronic commerce and the future for SMEs in a global market-place: Networking and public policies. Small Bus. Econ. 1999, 12, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feindt, S.; Jeffcoate, J.; Chappell, C. Identifying success factors for rapid growth in SME e-commerce. Small Bus. Econ. 2002, 19, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shah Alam, S.; Ali, M.Y.; Mohd Jani, M.F. An empirical study of factors affecting electronic commerce adoption among SMEs in Malaysia. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2011, 12, 375–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lee, W.J. Unravelling consumer responses to omni-channel approach. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2020, 15, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schrotenboer, D.; Constantinides, E.; Herrando, C.; de Vries, S. The Effects of Omni-Channel Retailing on Promotional Strategy. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 17, 360–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vafaei, A.; Yaghoubi, S.; Tajik, J.; Barzinpour, F. Designing a sustainable multi-channel supply chain distribution network: A case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 251, 119628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fan, Y.W.; Miao, Y.F.; Wu, S.C. Customer complaints and service policy in electronic commerce. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2013, 44, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Moengage—Omnichannel vs. Multichannel Marketing: How Does It Differ? Available online: https://www.moengage.com/learn/omnichannel-vs-multichannel (accessed on 14 September 2022).
  14. Katai, R. Multi-Channel vs. Omni-Channel: What’s the Difference? Available online: https://robertkatai.com/multichannel-vs-omnichannel/?hilite=omni (accessed on 14 September 2022).
  15. Ofek, E.; Katona, Z.; Sarvary, M. “Bricks and Clicks”: The Impact of Product Returns on the Strategies of Multichannel Retailers. Mark. Sci. 2011, 30, 42–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vasiliu, C.; Felea, M.; Albăstroiu, I.; Dobrea, M. Exploring multi-channel shopping behavior towards IT & C products, based on business students opinions. Amfiteatru Econ. J. 2016, 18, 184–198. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abhishek, V.; Jerath, K.; Zhang, Z.J. Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Manag. Sci. 2016, 62, 2259–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Brynjolfsson, E.; Hu, Y.; Simester, D. Goodbye pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Manag. Sci. 2011, 57, 1373–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rigby, D. The future of shopping. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cao, L.; Li, L. The impact of cross-channel integration on retailers’ sales growth. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weathers, D.; Sharma, S.; Wood, S.L. Effects of online communication practices on consumer perceptions of performance uncertainty for search and experience goods. J. Retail. 2007, 83, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Avery, J.; Steenburgh, T.J.; Deighton, J.; Caravella, M. Adding bricks to clicks: Predicting the patterns of cross-channel elasticities over time. J. Mark. 2012, 76, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Blázquez, M. Fashion shopping in multichannel retail: The role of technology in enhancing the customer experience. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2014, 18, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Melis, K.; Campo, K.; Breugelmans, E.; Lamey, L. The impact of the multi-channel retail mix on online store choice: Does online experience matter? J. Retail. 2015, 91, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, M.; Ren, C.; Wang, G.A.; He, Z. The impact of channel integration on consumer responses in omni-channel retailing: The mediating effect of consumer empowerment. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2018, 28, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yan, Y.; Zhao, R.; Liu, Z. Strategic introduction of the marketplace channel under spillovers from online to offline sales. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 267, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tang, F.F.; Xing, X. Will the growth of multi-channel retailing diminish the pricing efficiency of the web? J. Retail. 2001, 77, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Lim, E.T.; Goh, J.M.; Yang, F.; Lee, M.K. Customer’s reaction to cross-channel integration in omnichannel retailing: The mediating roles of retailer uncertainty, identity attractiveness, and switching costs. Decis. Support Syst. 2018, 109, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Melacini, M.; Perotti, S.; Rasini, M.; Tappia, E. E-fulfilment and distribution in omni-channel retailing: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2018, 48, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ancarani, F.; Shankar, V. Price levels and price dispersion within and across multiple retailer types: Further evidence and extension. J. Acad. Mark. 2004, 32, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bock, G.W.; Lee, J.; Kuan, H.H.; Kim, J.H. The progression of online trust in the multi-channel retailer context and the role of product uncertainty. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 53, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, W.; Li, G.; Cheng, T.C.E. Channel selection in a supply chain with a multi-channel retailer: The role of channel operating costs. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 173, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mishra, R.; Singh, R.K.; Koles, B. Consumer decision-making in Omnichannel retailing: Literature review and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 147–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Darke, P.R.; Brady, M.K.; Benedicktus, R.L.; Wilson, A.E. Feeling close from afar: The role of psychological distance in offsetting distrust in unfamiliar online retailers. J. Retail. 2016, 92, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bernon, M.; Cullen, J.; Gorst, J. Online retail returns management: Integration within an omni-channel distribution context. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2016, 46, 584–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ha, S.; Stoel, L. Online apparel retailing: Roles of e-shopping quality and experiential e-shopping motives. J. Serv. Manag. 2012, 23, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carlson, J.; O’Cass, A.; Ahrholdt, D. Assessing customers’ perceived value of the online channel of multichannel retailers: A two country examination. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 27, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jin, M.; Li, G.; Cheng, T.C.E. Buy online and pick up in-store: Design of the service area. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 268, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, L.; Lu, X.; Ba, S. An empirical study of the cross-channel effects between web and mobile shopping channels. Inf. Manag. 2016, 53, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, X. Retailers’ multichannel and price advertising strategies. Mark. Sci. 2009, 28, 1080–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Frasquet, M.; Mollá, A.; Ruiz, E. Identifying patterns in channel usage across the search, purchase and post-sales stages of shopping. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2015, 14, 654–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Anderson, W.P.; Chatterjee, L.; Lakshmanan, T.R. E-commerce, transportation, and economic geography. Growth Chang. 2003, 34, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cai, Y.J.; Lo, C.K. Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 229, 107729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Badrinarayanan, V.; Becerra, E.P.; Kim, C.H.; Madhavaram, S. Transference and congruence effects on purchase intentions in online stores of multi-channel retailers: Initial evidence from the US and South Korea. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2012, 40, 539–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Basak, S.; Basu, P.; Avittathur, B.; Sikdar, S. A game theoretic analysis of multichannel retail in the context of “showrooming”. Decis. Support Syst. 2017, 103, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lewis, J.; Whysall, P.; Foster, C. Drivers and technology-related obstacles in moving to multichannel retailing. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2014, 18, 43–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wagner, G.; Schramm-Klein, H.; Steinmann, S. Online retailing across e-channels and e-channel touchpoints: Empirical studies of consumer behavior in the multichannel e-commerce environment. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 107, 256–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jocevski, M.; Arvidsson, N.; Miragliotta, G.; Ghezzi, A.; Mangiaracina, R. Transitions towards omni-channel retailing strategies: A business model perspective. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2019, 47, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Galipoglu, E.; Kotzab, H.; Teller, C.; Hüseyinoglu, I.Ö.Y.; Pöppelbuß, J. Omni-channel retailing research–state of the art and intellectual foundation. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2018, 48, 365–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, X.; Jackson, J.E. Examining customer channel selection intention in the omni-channel retail environment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 208, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cicea, C.; Marinescu, C.; Albu, C.F.; Balan, P.D. Applying bibliometric mapping and clustering on research regarding biomass related innovation. In Proceedings of the 33rd IBIMA Conference, Granada, Spain, 11 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
  52. Cicea, C.; Ciocoiu, C.N.; Marinescu, C. Exploring the Research Regarding Energy-Economic Growth Relationship. Energies 2021, 14, 2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cicea, C.; Marinescu, C. Bibliometric analysis of foreign direct investment and economic growth relationship. A research agenda. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2021, 22, 445–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cicea, C.; Lefteris, T.; Marinescu, C.; Popa, Ș.C.; Albu, C.F. Applying Text Mining Technique on Innovation-Development Relationship: A Joint Research Agenda. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 2021, 55, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Silver, C. QDA Miner (with Wordstat and Simstat). J. Mix. Methods Res. 2014, 9, 386–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. González-Loureiro, M.; Kiessling, T.; Dabic, M. Acculturation and overseas assignments: A review and a research agenda. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2015, 49, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yelland, P. An Introduction to Correspondence Analysis. Math. J. 2010, 12, 86–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Greenacre, M. Correspondence Analysis. In International Encyclopedia of Education; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dabic, M.; González-Loureiro, M.; Furrer, O. Research on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Key approaches and new avenues. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 2014, 17, 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Greenacre, M. Interdisciplinary Statistics—Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2nd ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 137–196. [Google Scholar]
  61. Khangar, N.; Kamalja, K.K. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and its applications. Electron. J. Appl. Stat. Anal. 2017, 10, 432–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. López-Duarte, C.; González-Loureiro, M.; Vidal-Suárez, M.M.; González-Díaz, B. International strategic alliances and national culture: Mapping the field and developing a research agenda. J. World Bus. 2016, 51, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Massarani, L.; Neves, L.F.F. Communicating the “Race” for the COVID-19 Vaccine: An Exploratory Study in Newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. Front. Commun. 2021, 6, 643895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cogburn, D. Analyzing trends and topics in internet governance and cybersecurity debates found in twelve years of IGF transcripts. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 8–11 January 2019; pp. 902–911. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Types of retailing channels: (a) Multichannel retail system; (b) omni-channel retail system. Source: Authors’ own conception, based on [13,14].
Figure 1. Types of retailing channels: (a) Multichannel retail system; (b) omni-channel retail system. Source: Authors’ own conception, based on [13,14].
Jtaer 18 00002 g001aJtaer 18 00002 g001b
Figure 2. The geographic distribution of documents: (a) Region America; (b) Region Asia and Australia; (c) Region Europe. Source: Authors based on the Web of Science.
Figure 2. The geographic distribution of documents: (a) Region America; (b) Region Asia and Australia; (c) Region Europe. Source: Authors based on the Web of Science.
Jtaer 18 00002 g002
Figure 3. The temporal distribution of documents separated on regions (Jtaer 18 00002 i001-Asia, Jtaer 18 00002 i002-America and Jtaer 18 00002 i003-Europe). Source: Authors.
Figure 3. The temporal distribution of documents separated on regions (Jtaer 18 00002 i001-Asia, Jtaer 18 00002 i002-America and Jtaer 18 00002 i003-Europe). Source: Authors.
Jtaer 18 00002 g003
Figure 4. The dictionary of descriptors. Source: Authors.
Figure 4. The dictionary of descriptors. Source: Authors.
Jtaer 18 00002 g004
Figure 5. Clusters of descriptors by region: (a) America; (b) Europe; (c) Asia and Australia. Source: Authors.
Figure 5. Clusters of descriptors by region: (a) America; (b) Europe; (c) Asia and Australia. Source: Authors.
Jtaer 18 00002 g005
Figure 6. Link analysis of descriptors by region: (a) America; (b) Europe; (c) Asia and Australia. Source: authors.
Figure 6. Link analysis of descriptors by region: (a) America; (b) Europe; (c) Asia and Australia. Source: authors.
Jtaer 18 00002 g006aJtaer 18 00002 g006b
Figure 7. Correspondence analysis (descriptors versus years) by region: (a) America; (b) Europe; (c) Asia and Australia. Source: authors.
Figure 7. Correspondence analysis (descriptors versus years) by region: (a) America; (b) Europe; (c) Asia and Australia. Source: authors.
Jtaer 18 00002 g007
Table 1. Highly cited papers on topics related to channel strategy.
Table 1. Highly cited papers on topics related to channel strategy.
AuthorsNumber of CitationsTopic
Abhishek, Jerath & Zhang (2016) [17]319The paper compares two ways e-tailers (online retailers) have to allow manufacturers’ access to their customers (agency selling versus conventional selling).
Brynjolfsson, Hu & Simester (2011) [18]295The authors analyze data from a multichannel retailer in order to compare internet and traditional channels in terms of sales distribution.
Rigby (2011) [19]266The authors designed the Random Forest prediction model for the Indian online shopping market.
Ofek, Katona & Sarvary (2011) [15]253The paper discusses differences regarding pricing strategies and physical store assistance levels when using dual channel strategy.
Cao & Li (2015)
[20]
241This is an analysis on the impact of channel integration on a firm sales growth using a novel framework proposed by authors.
Weathers, Sharma & Wood (2007)
[21]
238The authors examine three online retailer communication practices and reveal on consumer perceptions of product performance uncertainty.
Avery et al. (2012)
[22]
236The analysis focuses on the effects appeared when introducing a new retail store channel to the existing direct channels.
Blázquez (2014)
[23]
180Focusing on fashion industry, the paper deals with multichannel shopping experiences and their influence on consumers’ perceptions and motivations.
Melis et al. (2015)
[24]
159The study investigates the drivers supporting the online shopping for groceries and changes that may affects them when customers gain experience.
Zhang et al. (2018)
[25]
125The authors connect channel integration strategy to client empowerment and use a specific framework to confirm the positive link between them.
Yan, Zhao & Liu (2018)
[26]
122The analysis focuses on the implications of introducing the marketplace channel and its effects on e-tailers and manufacturers.
Tang & Xing (2001)
[27]
117The study envisages two categories of retailers (traditional online retailers and pure Internet retailers) in order to study their pricing behaviour.
Li et al. (2018)
[28]
112Dealing with the customers reaction on cross-channel integration, the authors demonstrates the role of uncertainty, identity attractiveness, and switching costs in shaping this reaction.
Melacini et al. (2018)
[29]
106The paper applies a systematic literature review methodology in order to highlight specific features related to e-fulfilment and distribution associated with choosing omni-channel retailing
Ancarani & Shankar (2004)
[30]
103The study envisages three categories of retailers: pure-play Internet, bricks-and-mortar (traditional), and bricks-and-clicks (multichannel) retailers, in order to study their pricing behaviour.
Bock et al. (2012)
[31]
100Considering different product types and the multi-channel retailing context, the authors try to reveal what influences the online trust.
Wang, Li & Cheng (2016)
[32]
91The analysis explains there is a gap between the online and offline channels’ operating costs which affects the retailer’s choice on channel selection.
Mishra, Singh & Koles (2021)
[33]
82The literature review in this paper concentrates on consumer behaviour in omni-channel retailing, creating a holistic radiography of this theme in the scientific field.
Darke et al. (2016)
[34]
81The analysis presents insights on the online trust as influenced by psychological distance.
Bernon, Cullen & Gorst (2016) [35]81The paper concerns retail returns management process and addresses the emergent managerial implications of omni-channel retail returns.
Ha & Stoel (2012) [36]81The paper deals with e-shopping dimensions and factors and discuss their influence on the customers intention and satisfaction as shopping outcomes.
Carlson, O’Cass & Ahrholdt (2015)
[37]
76This paper focuses on customer perceived online channel value and how clients perceptions affect satisfaction and channel loyalty.
Jin, Li & Cheng (2018) [38]74The analysis discusses the buy-online-pick-up-in-store method and designs a theoretical model for the case of a physical retailer.
Huang, Lu & Ba (2016) [39]72The paper discusses web versus mobile shopping and the consumers shift from one to another.
Zhang (2009) [40]71The author brings into attention the pricing strategy adoption for traditional retailers choosing a multi-channel strategy.
Frasquet, Mollá & Ruiz (2015) [41]69Channel choice is brought into attention and presented as unique for each stage of the shopping process (search, purchase and post-sales activities).
Anderson, Chatterjee & Lakshmanan (2003) [42]68The authors identify possible spatial impacts of e-retailing development and try to put into question the substitution between e-retail and traditional retail.
Cai & Lo (2020) [43]66The analysis consists in a systematic literature review on omni-channel management.
Badrinarayanan et al. (2012) [44]60The authors aim to develop and validate a framework for investigating purchase intentions in online stores of multi-channel retailers.
Basak et al. (2017) [45]59The authors analyze the effect of showrooming on the online and traditional retailers sales.
Lewis, Whysall & Foster (2014) [46]58The paper identifies obstacles faced by retailers when moving to multi-channel retailing and designs a framework in this regard.
Wagner, Schramm-Klein & Steinmann (2020) [47]57This research paper combines the results of an online survey and an experimental study to substantiate salient features of online retailing.
Jocevski et al. (2019) [48]57The research paper links omni-channel strategies to digitalization in a business model context.
Galipoglu et al. (2018) [49]56The analysis focuses on the scientific literature on logistics and supply chain management in omni-channel strategies.
Xu & Jackson (2019) [50]49The authors discuss the omni-channel features that influence clients’ perception.
Source: authors based on Web of Science.
Table 2. Descriptors on regions with several characteristics.
Table 2. Descriptors on regions with several characteristics.
Category of
Descriptors
DescriptorsAmericaEuropeAsia and Australia
FrequencyNo of CasesTF/IDF *FrequencyNo of CasesTF/IDF *FrequencyNo of CasesTF/IDF *
Type of retail
environment
Online retail environment (ORE)19714419.230956560.635815852.7
Physical retail environment (PRE)5513934.211236429.61632600
Marketing mixProduct (PROD)2663916.53645436.45185136.6
Price (PRI)7613013448727195.464041105.8
Promotion & Distribution (P&D)1642154.34004956.92184233.8
Place (PLA)468439.26876132.42865315.4
Research and
Analysis
Channel syntax (C_S)1642639.123942505254470.7
Management Science (Mg_Sci)12626301103236992931.3
Theoretical model and studies (TMS)5344027.39366424.69395813.8
Trends and challenges and
future research (TCFR)
169416.82685720.52925413.4
Type of channels
retail
Multi-channel retail (M_R)4923553.712305794.36895337.1
Omni-channel retail (O_R)61925158114849163.4169642262.7
Single and dual channel (S&D_C)2973052.356439136.28205064.9
MarketMarket features (MF)1842450.2893031.62082868.8
Supply and demand (S&D)3382210533734101.433729106.4
Sales (SAL)24332361713647.21544027.1
ClientCustomer (CUST)5619212983489.72193551.3
Consumer behavior (C_B)9383958.318226273.115865911.6
Economic featuresManagement and strategies (Mg&Str)5884217.687362359395720.9
Logistics and services (Log&Ser)6943393.512276157.99505351.2
Marketing (Mk)2903339.13774760.53615125.5
Social issues (SI)1602056.32723675.11983839.3
* Term Frequency weighted by Inverse Document Frequency. Source: Authors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cicea, C.; Marinescu, C.; Banacu, C.S. Multi-Channel and Omni-Channel Retailing in the Scientific Literature: A Text Mining Approach. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010002

AMA Style

Cicea C, Marinescu C, Banacu CS. Multi-Channel and Omni-Channel Retailing in the Scientific Literature: A Text Mining Approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2023; 18(1):19-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cicea, Claudiu, Corina Marinescu, and Cristian Silviu Banacu. 2023. "Multi-Channel and Omni-Channel Retailing in the Scientific Literature: A Text Mining Approach" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 18, no. 1: 19-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop