Next Article in Journal
Looking Inside the Intramolecular C−H∙∙∙O Hydrogen Bond in Lactams Derived from α-Methylbenzylamine
Next Article in Special Issue
Essential Oil Composition and Bioactivities of Waldheimia glabra (Asteraceae) from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma Membrane Na+-Coupled Citrate Transporter (SLC13A5) and Neonatal Epileptic Encephalopathy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Essential Oil of Aristolochia trilobata: Synthesis, Routes of Exposure, Acute Toxicity, Binary Mixtures and Behavioral Effects on Leaf-Cutting Ants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Essential Oil from Premna microphylla Turczaninow

Marine College, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(3), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030381
Submission received: 31 January 2017 / Accepted: 26 February 2017 / Published: 28 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Oils: Chemistry and Bioactivity)

Abstract

:
Premna microphylla Turczaninow, an erect shrub, was widely used in Chinese traditional medicine to treat dysentery, appendicitis, and infections. In this study, the essential oil from P. microphylla Turcz. was obtained by hydrodistillation and analyzed by GC (Gas Chromatography) and GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer). Fifty-six compounds were identified in the oil which comprised about 97.2% of the total composition of the oil. Major components of the oil were blumenol C (49.7%), β-cedrene (6.1%), limonene (3.8%), α-guaiene (3.3%), cryptone (3.1%), and α-cyperone (2.7%). Furthermore, we assessed the in vitro biological activities displayed by the oil obtained from the aerial parts of P. microphylla, namely the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities. The antioxidant activity of the essential oil was evaluated by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity. For this, the IC50 value was estimated to be 0.451 mg/mL. The essential oil of P. microphylla exhibited considerable antibacterial capacity against Escherichia coli with an MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) value of 0.15 mg/mL, along with noticeable antibacterial ability against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus with an MIC value of 0.27 mg/mL. However, the essential oil did not show significant activity against fungus. The oil was tested for its cytotoxic activity towards HepG2 (liver hepatocellular cells) and MCF-7 Cells (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line) using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide) assay, and exerted cytotoxic activity with an IC50 of 0.072 and 0.188 mg/mL for 72 h. In conclusion, the essential oil from P. microphylla is an inexpensive but favorable resource with strong antibacterial capacity as well as cytotoxic activity. Thus, it has the potential for utilization in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries.

1. Introduction

The genus Premna (Verbenaceae), widely distributed in tropical and subtropical areas such as Asia, Africa, Australia, and the Pacific Islands, is an important medicinal plant family [1]. This genus consists of more than 200 species in the world, of which about 45 species are distributed in China. They have been found to display a wide spectrum of pharmacological effects involving anticancer, antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-leishmania activities [2]. P. microphylla Turcz., a deciduous shrub, belongs to this genus. It is broadly distributed in the mountainous regions in the east, middle, and south of China. Leaves of P. microphylla are widely used to treat dysentery, appendicitis, and infections [3].
Antioxidants can inhibit or delay the oxidation of oxidizable substrates, and this appears to be very important in the prevention of oxidative stress, which is suggested as one of the leading causes of many oxidation-related diseases [4]. Resistance against antibiotics by pathogenic bacteria is a major concern in the anti-infective therapy of both humans and animals [5]. Recently, many consumers prefer additive free foods or a safer approach like the utilization of more effective antioxidant and antibacterial agents from natural origins. Plant essential oils and their components have been shown to possess multiple and varied biological activities such as antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and antioxidant activities [6].
There were no literature reports on the chemical composition and biological activities of the essential oil from P. microphylla. Therefore, we used the hydrodistillation method to collect the oil, and we identified the chemical composition of the oil by GC-FID (Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detection) and GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer). Furthermore, the essential oil was investigated for its antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Composition

The components of the essential oil with their retention indices (RI) from the aerial parts of P. microphylla are listed in Table 1. GC-MS analyses revealed that the essential oil had a complex chemical profile. Separation of volatile components was accomplished by using a polar column (HP-5 MS). A total of fifty-six compounds represented 97.2% of the oil. The main fraction of the essential oil consisted of monoterpenes (60.6%), represented by oxygenated compounds (56.4%) and hydrocarbons (4.2%). The essential oil composition was dominated by blumenol C (49.7%), β-cedrene (6.1%), limonene (3.8%), α-guaiene (3.3%), cryptone (3.1%), and α-cyperone (2.7%).

2.2. Antioxidant Activity

The DPPH test aimed to measure the capacity of the essential oil to scavenge the free radical 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) by the donation of hydrogen atoms or electrons [8]. The effect of the oil on DPPH radical scavenging was compared to BHT (Butylated Hydroxytoluene), used as positive control, and the IC50 values were determined. The scavenging effect of the essential oil and standard BHT on the DPPH radical expressed as IC50 values was 0.451 mg/mL for P. microphylla vs. 0.067 mg/mL for BHT (Table 2). Therefore, the oil did not show a high antioxidant activity compared to the BHT, as presented in Table 2.

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial activities of the essential oil from P. microphylla were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed by the presence or absence of inhibition zone diameters (IZD) and MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) values by the microdilution method. The results are presented in Table 3. The inhibition zone diameter of almost 15 mm was indicative of a good antimicrobial activity. Additionally, the corresponding minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was equal to 0.512 mg/mL [9]. Thus, the essential oil of P. microphylla showed a strong antibacterial activity against the tested Gram-positive and negative bacteria with MIC values of 0.270 mg/mL (IZD: 15.1–15.4 mm) and 0.150–0.480 mg/mL (IZD: 9.0–21.8 mm), respectively. The best activities were observed against E. coli with an MIC value of 0.150 mg/mL (IZD: 21.8 mm) followed by B. subtilis, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa. However, it did not have a significant activity against the fungus (MIC: >0.5 mg/mL).

2.4. Cytotoxic Activity

General cell toxic effects of P. microphylla essential oil were evaluated by using the MTT assay against HepG2 cells (liver hepatocellular cell line) and MCF-7 cells (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line). All cell lines were subjected to increasing concentrations of essential oil for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. The results are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. The essential oil exhibited a significant growth inhibition against the examined human cancer cells and induced a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect at concentrations ranging from 0.016–2 mg/mL. The oil was found to be able to inhibit HepG2 cells (liver hepatocellular cells), with an IC50 of 0.072 mg/mL (Table 4), as well as MCF-7 cells (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line), with an IC50 of 0.188 mg/mL (Table 5) after 72 h of incubation.

3. Discussion

To our knowledge, there are no literature reports on the chemical composition and biological activities of the essential oil from P. microphylla. Thus, our findings are of interest. In this study, the oxygenated monoterpenes (56.4%) were revealed as predominant over the monoterpene hydrocarbons (4.2%). The oil was found to contain primarily blumenol C (49.7%), β-cedrene (6.1%), limonene (3.8%), α-guaiene (3.3%), cryptone (3.1%), and α-cyperone (2.7%). Blumenol C was first isolated from the leaves of Podocarpus blumei in 1972. The absolute stereochemistry of blumenol C was then determined as (6R,9R) by the chemical conversion of a related compound. Its glucoside, i.e., blumenol C glucoside, was then isolated from the aerial parts of Epimedium grandiflorum var. thunbergianum [10]. β-Cedrene is a bioactive sesquiterpene which exerts antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, tonic, astringent, diuretic, sedative, insecticidal, and antifungal activities [11]. This compound is used in traditional medicine and in cosmetic products. Moreover, cedrene is found to be a potent competitive inhibitor of CYP2B6-mediated bupropion hydroxylase [12]. Another main component is limonene, which is common in cosmetic products. As a flavouring compound, limonene is used in food manufacturing and certain medicines, e.g., as a flavoring to mask the bitter taste of alkaloids. In natural and alternative medicine, it is marketed to relieve gastroesophageal reflux disease and heartburn [13]. Additionally, limonene is being increasingly used as a solvent for cleaning purposes, such as the removal of oil from machines [14].
In the radical scavenging activity assay, the essential oil of P. microphylla displayed weak activity. Essential oils are quite complex mixtures composed of a great variety of compounds. Generally, because of this complexity it is difficult to explain their activities. Many reports on the antioxidant potentials of essential oils often refer to concepts such as synergism, antagonism, and additivity [15]. The chemical components of the oil were dominated by blumenol C (49.7%), β-cedrene (6.1%), and limonene (3.8%), which displayed low inhibition of free radicals. The antioxidant property of the Eucalyptus globulus essential oil stands out when compared to the P. microphylla oil, since its IC50 value is 0.065 mg/mL [16]. It could be inferred that the antioxidant activity of the Eucalyptus globulus oil is mainly due to the presence of its major compounds, namely 1,8-cineole (63.8%). 1,8-cineole showed various degrees of reducing power, radical scavenging, chelating, in addition to its DNA-protective capacity [17]. Moreover, the high value of the reducing power indicated that the essential oil components are able to act as electron donors and reduce the oxidized intermediate of lipid peroxidation so that they can act as primary and secondary antioxidants [18].
The results from the growth inhibition zone diameters (IZD) and the MIC values indicated that the essential oil from P. microphylla had strong inhibitory effects against all Gram-negative bacteria and certain Gram-positive bacteria, with MIC values of 0.270 mg/mL (IZD:15.1–15.4 mm) and 0.150 mg/mL (IZD: 9.0–21.8 mm), respectively. E. coli was the most sensitive strain with an MIC value of 0.150 mg/mL (IZD: 21.8 mm) followed by B. subtilis and S. aureus with an MIC value of 0.270 mg/mL (IZD: 15.4 mm). However, it did not have significant activity against P. aeruginosa, along with an absence of antifungal activity, since P. aeruginosa possesses an intrinsic resistance, which is associated with the nature of its outer membrane to a wide range of biocides. The outer layer of the Gram-negative outer membrane is composed primarily of lipopolysaccharide. This forms a hydrophilic permeability barrier which provides protection against the effects of toxic agents [19]. These compounds (except terpinen-4-ol) are normally inactive because they are unable to effectively penetrate the outer membrane [20], thus the presence of a low concentration of terpinen-4-ol (0.7%) leads to the absence of significant effects on P. aeruginosa. It is well known that essential oils and their components show a better antimicrobial effectiveness against Gram-positive bacteria. Due to the composition of the outer membrane, essential oil can not only alter such structures but can penetrate within the cell, leading to alterations such as the denaturation of proteins and enzymes, the “unbalance” of the K+ and H+ ion concentration, to the modification of the entire cell morphology, which can lead to the death of the microorganism [21,22,23].
Phenolic compounds generally show a good antimicrobial effectiveness against Gram-positive bacteria; their effect is dependent on their amount: at low concentrations, they are able to interfere with enzymes involved in the production of energy; at higher concentrations, they can induce the denaturation of proteins until an irreversible modification of the cell and death. Thus, the strong antibacterial activity of the essential oil of P. microphylla against the tested bacteria could be attributed to the presence of the high concentration of blumenol C (49.7%) [24].
The microorganisms tested in the present investigation are large and cover the most important human pathogens known as opportunists for man and animals, which cause food contamination and deterioration. The obtained results are significant, particularly in the case of E. coli which is well-known for causing gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections, and neonatal meningitis [25]. The results above indicated that the oil was noticeably active and may be useful in pharmaceutical engineering.
This work reports on the cytotoxic activity of P. microphylla essential oil. It shows cytotoxic activities on breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 (0.188 mg/mL, IC50) and hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells (0.072 mg/mL, IC50). The results quite modestly display that the oil does affect the growth of these tested cancer cell lines. From this, certain antitumor activity can be expected but remains to be further explored. The toxic activity of the essential oil of P. microphylla against the tested bacteria could be attributed to the presence of significant amounts of limonene (3.8%), β-cedrene (6.1%), α-cyperone (2.7%), and myristicin (1.2%). In previous studies, the principal metabolites of limonene are trans-carveol, a product of 6-hydroxylation, and perillyl alcohol, a product of 7-hydroxylation by the CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 cytochromes in human liver microsomes [26]. Perillyl alcohol has been investigated for its pharmacological activity as a dietary chemotherapeutic agent. They are viewed as novel therapeutic options in some CNS neoplasms and other solid tumours, particularly for the treatment of gliomas [27]. The cytotoxic activities of perillyl alcohol and limonene metabolites are likely due to their antiangiogenic activities, hyperthermia inducing effects, as well as negative apoptosis regulation and Ras (Renin-Agiotensin System) pathways [28]. Moreover, β-cedrene is considered to be a powerful antimicrobial and antitumor agent [29]. α-Cyperone has been shown to alleviate lung cell injury caused by Staphylococcus aureus, to be effective against E. coli, and to act as an anti-inflammatory agent [30,31,32]. Myristicin is a naturally occurring alkenylbenzene compound found in nutmeg, and it induces cytotoxicity in SK-N-SH cells by an apoptotic mechanism [33]. Moreover, besides the contribution of specific constituents, the synergism between various components of the essential oil could play an important role in the cytotoxic effect verified in this study against HepG2 and MCF-7 cells.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Plant Material

P. microphylla was collected from the Zhejiang Province of China in September 2016, and was identified by Associate Prof. Zhao of Shandong University (Weihai, China). A voucher specimen (No. 1703) was deposited at the Laboratory of Botany of Marine College, Shandong University.

4.2. Essential Oil Isolation

For the plant material, the aerial part of P. microphylla (500 g) was hydrodistilled for six hours by using a Clevenger apparatus to obtain the essential oil (1.56 g, 0.31% w/w), and the oil was stored at 4 °C until analysis.

4.3. Gas Chromatography Analysis

The oil sample was analyzed by using an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with flame ionization detector (FID, Agilent). Column: capillary column HP-5MS, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm film thickness. The GC oven temperature was programmed to stay at 60 °C for 1 min, heat to 200 °C at a rate of 15 °C/min, keep constant at 200 °C for 5 min, and then heat to 280 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, and keep constant at 280 °C for 2 min [34].

4.4. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

GC-MS analyses were carried out using a Hewlett Packard 6890 gas chromatograph (Agilent) fitted with an HP-5MS fused silica column, interfaced with a Hewlett Packard 5975C mass selective detector operated by HP Enhanced ChemStation software (Agilent). The oven temperature was programmed from 60–280 °C at 5 °C/min using helium as a carrier gas at 1.2 mL/min. The injector temperature was 250 °C; the injection volume was 0.2 μL of 1% solution prepared in n-hexane; split ratio 1:50. GC parameters were the same as above; Mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV. The mass range was from m/z 50 to 550.

4.5. Identification of Components

The oil components were identified from their GC retention indices (RI) obtained with reference to n-alkanes series on a HP-5MS column, and comparison of their mass spectra and fragmentation patterns by computer matching with the Nist 8.0 Mass Spectral Database for GC-MS. The relative amounts of individual components were calculated based on GC peak area (FID response) without using a correction factor. The result of the analysis is shown in Table 1.

4.6. Antioxidant Activity Assay

The antioxidant activity of the essential oil was determined with the DPPH radical protocol [35]. DPPH is a well-known radical and a trap for other radicals. Therefore, the rate reduction of a chemical reaction upon addition of DPPH is used as an indicator of the radical nature of that reaction. Because of a strong absorption band centered at about 520 nm, the DPPH radical has a deep violet color in solution, and it becomes colorless or pale yellow when neutralized. This property allows visual monitoring of the reaction, and the number of initial radicals can be counted from the change in the optical absorption at 520 nm or in the EPR (Electron Spin Resonance) signal of the DPPH [36]. Free radical scavenging activity of the essential oil was measured by a spectrophotometer at 517 nm. A methanol solution of DPPH was prepared immediately before the assay. Various concentrations of each 2 mL sample (0.100, 0.150, 0.200, 0.250, 0.300, 0.350, 0.400, 0.450, 0.500 mg/mL) were added to 2 mL of DPPH solution. The reaction mixture was shaken and allowed to stand for 30 min in the shade. The absorbance of the samples was measured by a spectrophotometer at 517 nm and calculated by the following equation:
DPPH radical scavenging activity = (A0 − A1)/A0 × 100%
where A0 is the absorbance of the control (blank, without extract) and A1 is the absorbance of the mixture with the essential oil. In this assay, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as a standard antioxidant to validate the assay. The experiment was repeated three times. The result of the antioxidant activity test is shown in Table 2.

4.7. Antimicrobial Activity

4.7.1. Bacterial and Fungal Strains

Four bacteria strains were selected for the antibacterial tests, including the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), and the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853).
The following fungal strains were also tested: Candida albicans (ATCC 10231), Aspergillus niger (ATCC 16404), and Fusarium oxysporum (ATCC 695).

4.7.2. Agar Diffusion Methods

The antibacterial and antifungal activities of the essential oil of P. microphylla were assessed using paper disk agar diffusion, according to the method described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard, with some modification [37]. Absorbent disks (Whatman disk of 6 mm diameter) were impregnated with 15 μL of essential oil or chloramphenicol, ampicillin, or ketoconazole as a positive control and were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by measuring the inhibition zone, by examining the disk diffusion plates from the back, viewed against a black background and illuminated with reflected light. With a caliper, the diameter of each zone of inhibition was measured and recorded to the nearest whole millimeter. This is the diameter of the zone visibly presenting the absence of bacterial growth, including the 6 mm disk.

4.7.3. Determination of the Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MIC)

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined for all oils by using the microplate dilution method [38]. Stock solutions of the oils and the standard antibacterial compound chloramphenicol were prepared in the Mueller Hinton Broth liquid medium, and stock solutions of the oils and standard antifungal compounds ampicillin and ketoconazole were prepared in the Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) liquid medium. Serial dilution of the initial concentrations were prepared on 96-well microlitre plates containing equal amounts of distilled water. The microbial suspension concentration was standardized to McFarland No. 0.5 after incubation for 24 h at 37 °C. Cultures were mixed with essential oils and were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC: mg/mL) was detected as the minimum concentration where microbial growth was missing. 1% 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) was used as an indicator of microbial growth. In order to facilitate the dispersion of the essential oil in the aqueous nutrient medium, it was diluted with Tween 20, at a ratio of 15%. The negative control containing only Tween 20 was not toxic to the microorganisms [39,40]. Chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and ketoconazole were used as positive controls. All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The results of the bacterial activity tests are given in Table 3.

4.8. Cytotoxic Activity

HepG2 (liver hepatocellular cells) and MCF-7 cells (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line) were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37 °C, in RPMI1640 medium containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics (200 U of penicillin and 50 mg of streptomycin per liter) and were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere [41]. Cytotoxicity was measured using the MTT test with slight modifications. Cells were seeded at 5 × 103 cells/well in 200 μL of growth medium and were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for cell adherence. The microplates were treated with the substances and incubated for 24, 48, and 72 h.
Then, 10 μL of MTT was added to each well (5 mg/mL) and the incubation was continued for a further 2 h. 100 μL of DMSO was added to each well. The absorbance (A) was measured at 570 nm using a Multiskan Ascent microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The assay was realized in triplicate as a cell viability index. The percentages of cell growth were calculated as follows:
Cell growth (%) = [A (sample)/A (control)] × 100%
Cytotoxicity is expressed as the concentration of extract inhibiting cell growth by 50% (IC50) [42]. The results of the cytotoxicity activity tests are given in Table 4 and Table 5.

5. Conclusions

Due to no previous knowledge, we identified the chemical components of the essential oil from P. microphylla by using GC-MS. Furthermore, we studied its antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities. The oil was shown to possess high levels of oxygenated monoterpenes with strong antibacterial and antitumor potential which might be due to the presence of blumenol C (49.7%), cedrene (6.1%), and limonene (3.8%), potentially leading to its ecofriendly and beneficial utilization in pharmaceutical applications.
Our research provide evidence that the aerial parts of P. microphylla can be considered as a good source of bioactive compounds such as blumenol C. Moreover, the results indicate that the oil from P. microphylla exhibits antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli with an MIC value of 0.15 mg/mL, and also some antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus with an MIC value of 0.27 mg/mL. It may thus have a certain potential to cure gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections, and neonatal meningitis.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully appreciate Department of Chemistry, Marine College, Shandong University for facilities and encouragement. We especially thank Yao Xiao for critically reading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Peng-Xiang Lai designed the study. Han-Yu Zhang collected the plant samples. Han-Yu Zhang performed the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activity assays. Peng-Xiang Lai carried out the chemical analysis of the essential oil. Han-Yu Zhang and Yang Gao interpreted the obtained data. Han-Yu Zhang wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ayinampudi, S.R.; Domala, R. New icetexane diterpenes with intestinal α-glucosidase inhibitory and free-radical scavenging activity isolated from Premna tomentosa, roots. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Suresh, G.; Babu, K.S. Novel cytotoxic icetexane diterpenes from Premna latifolia Roxb. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1273–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhong, C.G.; Wang, D.Y. Four new isoflavones from Premna microphylla. Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2002, 12, 143–148. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kemper, N. Veterinary antibiotics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ben, H.A.; Hamdi, N. Characterization of essential oil from Citrus aurantium L flowers: Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. J. Oleo Sci. 2013, 62, 763–772. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol., 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hammami, S.; Jmii, H. Essential oil composition, antioxidant, cytotoxic and antiviral activities of Teucrium pseudochamaepitys growing spontaneously in Tunisia. Molecules 2015, 20, 20426–20433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tepe, B.; Daferera, D. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and various extracts of Salvia tomentosa, Miller (Lamiaceae). Food Chem. 2005, 90, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Santos, N.; Pascon, R. Cytotoxic and antimicrobial constituents from the essential oil of Lippia alba (Verbenaceae). Medicines 2016, 3, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matsunami, K.; Otsuka, H. Structural revisions of blumenol C glucoside and byzantionoside B. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010, 58, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeong, H.U.; Kwon, S.S. Inhibitory effects of cedrol, β-cedrene, and thujopsene on cytochrome p450 enzyme activities in human liver microsomes. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2014, 77, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oh, I.; Yang, W.Y. In vitro Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitory activity and antimicrobial activity of sesquiterpenes isolated from Thujopsis dolabrata. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2011, 34, 2141–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, J. d-limonene: Safety and clinical applications. Altern. Med. Rev. A J. Clin. Ther. 2007, 12, 259–264. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pike, J.A.; Dorricott, W.J. Self-Adhesive Stamps. U.S. Patent 5902439 A, 11 May 1999. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ben, H.A.; Ben, H.N. Essential oil from Artemisia phaeolepis: Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities. J. Oleo Sci. 2013, 62, 973–980. [Google Scholar]
  16. Luís, Â.; Duarte, A.; Gominho, J. Chemical composition, antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-quorum sensing activities of Eucalyptus globulus, and Eucalyptus radiata, essential oils. Ind. Crop Prod. 2016, 79, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Horvathova, E.; Navarova, J. Assessment of antioxidative, chelating, and dna-protective effects of selected essential oil components (eugenol, carvacrol, thymol, borneol, eucalyptol) of plants and intact Rosmarinus officinalis oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6632–6639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Petrelli, R.; Orsomando, G. Biological activities of the essential oil from Erigeron floribundus. Molecules 2016, 21, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nikaido, H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Rev. 1985, 49, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mann, C.M.; Cox, S.D. The outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 6749 contributes to its tolerance to the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 30, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sikkema, J.; de Bont, J.A. Interactions of cyclic hydrocarbons with biological membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 8022–8028. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Tiwari, B.K.; Valdramidis, V.P. Application of natural antimicrobials for food preservation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5987–6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marrufo, T.; Nazzaro, F. Chemical composition and biological activity of the essential oil from leaves of Moringa oleifera Lam. cultivated in mozambique. Molecules 2013, 18, 10989–11000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Afroditi, S.; Constantina, N. Antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and antiviral activities of Salvia fruticosa essential oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 3197–3201. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rajagopala, S.V.; Sikorski, P. The binary protein-protein interaction landscape of Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Miyazawa, M.; Shindo, M. Metabolism of (+)- and (−)-limonenes to respective carveols and perillyl alcohols by cyp2c9 and cyp2c19 in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2002, 30, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Da, F.C.; Simão, M. Efficacy of monoterpene perillyl alcohol upon survival rate of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. 2011, 137, 287–293. [Google Scholar]
  28. De Saldanha da Gama Fischer, J.; Costa Carvalho, P.; da Fonseca, C.O.; Liao, L.; Degrave, W.M.; da Gloria da Costa Carvalho, M.; Yates, J.R., III; Domont, G.B. Chemo-resistant protein expression pattern of glioblastoma cells (a172) to perillyl alcohol. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Aisa, H.A.; Lin, J. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antitumor Activities of the Essential Oils and Crude Extracts of Euphorbia macrorrhiza. Molecules 2012, 17, 5030–5039. [Google Scholar]
  30. Luo, M.; Qiu, J. α-cyperone alleviates lung cell injury caused by Staphylococcus aureus via attenuation of α-hemolysin expression. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 1170–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, L.Y.; Lv, S.; Wu, S.C.; Guo, X.; Xia, F.; Hu, X.R.; Song, Z.; Zhang, C.; Qin, Q.Q.; Fu, B.D.; et al. Inhibitory effects of α-cyperone on adherence and invasion of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli, o78 to chicken type ii pneumocytes. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2014, 159, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jung, S.H.; Su, J.K. α-Cyperone, isolated from the rhizomes of cyperus rotundus, inhibits LPS-induced cox-2 expression and PGE2, production through the negative regulation of NFκB signalling in RAW 264 7 cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 147, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lee, B.K.; Kim, J.H. Myristicin-induced neurotoxicity in human neuroblastoma sk-n-sh cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2005, 157, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yamaguchi, T.; Takamura, H. HPLC method for evaluation of the free radical-scavenging activity of foods by using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998, 62, 1201–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Omp, S.; Tejk, B. DPPH antioxidant assay revisited. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 1202–1205. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cockerill, F.R. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
  38. Işcan, G.; Kirimer, N. Antimicrobial screening of Mentha piperita essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3943–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. De, M.L.; De, F.V. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils from three chemotypes of Origanum vulgare L. ssp. hirtum (Link) Ietswaart growing wild in Campania (Southern Italy). Molecules 2009, 14, 2735–2746. [Google Scholar]
  40. Junru, H.U.; Jiang, H. Study on three non-water-soluble solvents influencing of inhibitory activity in antibacterial test. West. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2013, 26, 30–31. [Google Scholar]
  41. Silva, S.L.D.; Figueiredo, P.M.; Yano, T. Cytotoxic evaluation of essential oil from Zanthoxylum rhoifolium Lam. leaves. Acta Amazon. 2007, 37, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ghribi, L.; Nejma, A.B. Chemical composition, cytotoxic and antibacterial activities of the essential oil from the Tunisian ononis angustissima L. (Fabaceae). J. Oleo Sci. 2016, 65, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the essential oil is available from the authors.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Premna microphylla Turcz.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Premna microphylla Turcz.
Peak No.Compound aRI bRI cPeak Area %Identification d
1δ-3-Carene100710070.2MS, RI
2Limonene103110313.8MS, RI
3p-Cymene109510950.3MS, RI
4α-Campholenal113211310.2MS, RI
5cis-Verbenol114611440.1MS, RI
6Terpinen-4-ol118511870.7MS, RI
7Cryptone119511923.1MS, RI
8Verbenone121912190.4MS, RI
9Cuminal124912481.0MS, RI
10Piperitone126212620.2MS, RI
11Neral126612680.3MS, RI
12Phellandral128612810.2MS, RI
13Perillaldehyde129512860.2MS, RI
14Piperitenone130613090.5MS, RI
15α-Copaene138913900.2MS, RI
16β-Elemene140314031.4MS, RI
17α-Cedrene143314321.2MS, RI
18β-Cedrene144214466.1MS, RI
19α-Himachalene145914600.2MS, RI
20γ-Himachalene147014680.3MS, RI
21Ledene147514730.1MS, RI
22α-Guaiene148214823.3MS, RI
23Eremophilene150415021.3MS, RI
24β-Selinene 151415091.0MS, RI
25Myristicin153215291.2MS, RI
26Spathulenol155015481.0MS, RI
27Elemicin155815581.2MS, RI
28Geranyl butyrate 157415700.4MS, RI
29α-Cedrol 158115800.2MS, RI
30Caryophyllene oxide160116011.5MS, RI
31Epiglobulol160516080.3MS, RI
32Epicedrol 163016320.9MS, RI
33Acorenone B163816320.4MS, RI
34Widdrol 165116510.4MS, RI
352-Methylhexadecane165816650.3MS, RI
36Bulnesol 166616660.5MS, RI
37α-Cedrenol 167316690.7MS, RI
38Farnesol *168416820.4MS, RI
39cis-14-nor-Muurol-5-en-4-one170016962.4MS, RI
40Blumenol C1715171349.7MS, RI
41α-Cyperone174817552.7MS, RI
42Cedranyl acetate178717800.5MS, RI
43Saussurea lactone180318060.2MS, RI
44Nootkatone181018100.2MS, RI
45Dehydrofukinone182318200.2MS, RI
46Neophytadiene183218360.4MS, RI
47Perhydrofarnesyl acetone183918360.2MS, RI
48Corymbolone189218980.2MS, RI
49β-Cyclodihydrocostunolide194719470.1MS, RI
50Kaurene 205720610.7MS, RI
511-Octadecanol209520900.1MS, RI
52Oleic Acid213921401.1MS, RI
53Octadecyl acetate220322051.1MS, RI
54Eicosanol229922900.8MS, RI
55Docosanoic methyl ester252325240.2MS, RI
56Methyl tetracosanoate272627250.7MS, RI
monoterpene hydrocarbons 4.2
oxygenated monoterpenes 56.4
sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 14.8
oxygenated sesquiterpenes 13.8
diterpenes 1.1
Total 97.2
Notes: Compounds a are listed in order of their elution from a HP-5MS column; RI b (retention index): RI-non-isothermal Kovats retention indices on a HP-5MS column; RI c linear retention indices from the literature (NIST 08 Mass Spectra Library (Version 2.0 f) and WILEY’S Library of Mass spectra 9th Edition [7]) on a HP-5MS column; Identification d: RI: Linear Retention index; MS: Mass Spectrometry; * correct isomer not identified.
Table 2. DPPH scavenging activity of the essential oil of Premna microphylla Turcz.
Table 2. DPPH scavenging activity of the essential oil of Premna microphylla Turcz.
Concentration (mg/mL)DPPH Scavenging Activity a
P. microphyllaBHT b
0.1015.5 ± 2.071.5 ± 5.3
0.1519.9 ± 1.885.7 ± 3.3
0.2025.7 ± 2.290.3 ± 0.8
0.2531.7 ± 2.391.7 ± 1.1
0.3036.5 ± 1.092.5 ± 2.3
0.3546.4 ± 2.894.1 ± 0.8
0.4047.1 ± 1.795.7 ± 0.9
0.4548.6 ± 3.596.5 ± 0.1
0.5052.3 ± 1.298.7 ± 0.4
Antioxidant activity a (inhibition %), expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. Positive control b used.
Table 3. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of the essential oil of Premna microphylla Turcz.
Table 3. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of the essential oil of Premna microphylla Turcz.
MicroorganismDiameter of the Inhibition Zones (mm) aMIC (mg/mL)
EOChAmKeEOChAmKe
Gram positive
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 653815.1 ± 0.527.8 ± 0.9N.T.N.T.0.2700.025N.T.N.T.
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 663315.4 ± 0.230.2 ± 1.0N.T.N.T.0.2700.013N.T.N.T.
Gram negative
Escherichia coli ATCC 2592221.8 ± 0.432.5 ± 0.5N.T.N.T.0.1500.125N.T.N.T.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC 278539.0 ± 0.415.5 ± 0.4N.T.N.T.0.4800.100N.T.N.T.
Fungus
Candida albicans ATCC 102317.0 ± 0.2N.T.35.5 ± 0.8N.T.>0.500N.T.0.005N.T.
Aspergillus niger ATCC 164046.9 ± 0.8N.T.N.T.32.4 ± 0.4>0.500N.T.N.T.0.003
Fusarium oxysporum ATCC 6956.8 ± 0.7N.T.N.T.31.8 ± 0.4>0.500N.T.N.T.0.003
The diameter of the inhibition zones (mm), including the disc diameter (6 mm), are given as the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. Diameter of the inhibition zones a of the EO: essential oil of P. microphylla (tested volume, 1 mg/mL); positive control: Ch, chloramphenicol; Am, ampicillin; Ke, ketoconazole (tested volume, 0.01 mg/mL); N.T.: not tested.
Table 4. Cytotoxic activity of the essential oil from Premna microphylla Turcz. against HepG2 Cells (liver hepatocellular cells).
Table 4. Cytotoxic activity of the essential oil from Premna microphylla Turcz. against HepG2 Cells (liver hepatocellular cells).
Concentration (mg/mL)0.0160.0310.0630.1250.2500.50012IC50 (mg/mL) a
Cell growth (%)24 h96.295.599.998.090.391.997.373.4>2
48 h95.396.889.379.356.731.216.06.40.315 ± 0.023
72 h68.857.456.242.339.020.011.37.50.072 ± 0.005
Cisplatin b 0.003 ± 0.001
IC50 a = the concentration of compound that affords a 50% reduction in cell growth (after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation); Cisplatin b was tested as a reference; Expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments.
Table 5. Cytotoxic activity of the essential oil from Premna microphylla Turcz. against MCF-7 Cells (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line).
Table 5. Cytotoxic activity of the essential oil from Premna microphylla Turcz. against MCF-7 Cells (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line).
Concentration (mg/mL)0.0160.0310.0630.1250.2500.50012IC50 a (mg/mL)
Cell growth (%)24 h98.499.797.696.586.982.780.264.7>2
48 h98.595.394.292.691.973.334.46.50.751 ± 0.045
72 h99.085.982.364.645.314.44.43.60.188 ± 0.021
Cisplatin b 0.003 ± 0.01
IC50 a = the concentration of a compound that affords a 50% reduction in cell growth (after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation); Cisplatin b was tested as a reference; Expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.-Y.; Gao, Y.; Lai, P.-X. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Essential Oil from Premna microphylla Turczaninow. Molecules 2017, 22, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030381

AMA Style

Zhang H-Y, Gao Y, Lai P-X. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Essential Oil from Premna microphylla Turczaninow. Molecules. 2017; 22(3):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Han-Yu, Yang Gao, and Peng-Xiang Lai. 2017. "Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Essential Oil from Premna microphylla Turczaninow" Molecules 22, no. 3: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030381

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop