Next Article in Journal
The Cladistic Basis for the Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) Measure Links Evolutionary Features to Environmental Gradients and Supports Broad Applications of Microbial Ecology’s “Phylogenetic Beta Diversity” Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Laser-Induced Silver Nanoparticles on Titanium Oxide for Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Hunt, R.W. et al. Electromagnetic Biostimulation of Living Cultures for Biotechnology, Biofuel and Bioenergy Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4515-4558

1
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
2
Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10(11), 4719-4722; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10114719
Submission received: 30 October 2009 / Published: 30 October 2009
We found some errors in the paper published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences [1]. The table 1 had some typographical errors, information regarding field intensity missing, and the nomenclature did not match the legend. The corrected version is given below.
Table 1. Summary of electromagnetic treatments of some microorganisms.
Table 1. Summary of electromagnetic treatments of some microorganisms.
Organism Class*EMIntensityBiological effectReference
Archaea
Methanosarcina barkeriMW13.5–36.5 GHzIncrease in growth, cell count, size and methane production[5]
Eubacteria
E. coliSMF0.05–1 mTStimulated transposition activity and reduced cell viability[6]
OMF16, 60 HzStimulation and suppression of enolase activity[7]

OMF0.05–1 mTReduced transposition activity and enhanced cell viability[6]
OMF100 mTExposure time dependent stimulation or inhibition of cell viability[8]
OMF30 μTCell density dependent changes in AVTD[9]
DC EFNAIncrease in growth and removal of inhibitory compounds in medium[10]
OMF0.1–1 mT @ 50 HzSignificant morphotype changes and alteration during cell division[11]
ACEF2.5–50 V/cm @ 0.05–100 kHzStimulation of membrane bound ATP synthesis, optimum at 100 Hz[12]
6-polar ACEF0.35–2.1 kHz for test tubes 60 Hz for Petri dishesIncrease in growth in test tubes (147 ± 24%) and colonies (42–179%)[13,14]
Bacillus cereus6-polar ACEF1 kHzIncrease in growth (196 ± 29%)[13,14]
B. mucilaginosusSMF~0.39 TIncrease in growth[15]
B. subtilisOMF0.8, 2.5 mT, 0.8 and 1 kHzIncrease in growth and a loss of intercellular cohesion[16]
Bacteria & YeastOMF0–0.3 Hz @ 5–90 mTElevated or even diminished growth rates for Bacillus subtilis, Candida albicans, Halobacterium, Salmonella typhimurium, and Staphylococci[17]
Pseudomonas stutzeriSMF0.6–1.3 mTIncrease in growth[18]
Trichoderma reeseiSMF1.5 mV cm–1Increase in growth and cellulase activity and secretion[19]
Streptomyces nourseiSMF1.5 mV cm–1Increased antibiotic production, O2 evolution and glucose uptake[20]
Salmonella typhimuriumOMF15 [email protected]Growth stimulation; Mutation reversion rate unaffected[17]
Micrococcus denitrificansSMF500–800 mTGrowth inhibition followed by stimulation after 6 h[21]
Corynebacterium glutamicumOMF4.9 mT, 50 HzIncrease in ATP levels by about 30%[22]
Natural FloraSMF22 mTEnhanced degradation of phenolic waste liquors[23]
Natural FloraPEF1.25 – 3.25 kVcm–1Enhanced biosorption of uranium[24]
Bacteria & yeastOMF15 [email protected] Hz30% increase in growth in gram –ve bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Halobacterium halobium) than gram +ve (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus epidermidis) and yeast (Candida albicans).[17]
Rhodobacter sphaeroidesOMF/ SMF0.13–0.3 TIncrease in porphyrin synthesis; Enhanced expression of 5-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase[25]
Cyanobacteria
Spirulina platensisSMF10 mTIncrease in growth (50%), O2 evolution and sugar and phycocyanin production[26]
250 mTIncrease in growth (22%), CNP and minerals uptake and chlorophyll content[27]
MW7.1 mm @ 2.2mWcm–2Increased growth (50%)[28]
Anabaena doliolumSMF300 mTIncrease in growth, pigments, carbohydrate and protein[29]
Algae
Chlorella vulgarisSMF10–35 mTIncrease in growth (100%); Stimulated antioxidant defense[30]
Chlorella sp.SMF6–58 mTIncrease in growth (NA)[31]
Dunaliella salinaSMF10–23 mTIncrease in growth (90%), and β-carotene content[32]
Scenedesmus sp.PEFNAEnhanced oil extraction[33]
Yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiaePMF~ 4.7 μTIncreased activity of alcohol dehydrogenase[34]
OMF+SMF20 mT + 8 mTIncrease in ethanol and sugar utilization[35]
S. cerevisiaeOMF0.28–12 mTIncrease in growth[36]
OMF0.2–12 mT @ 50 HzIncrease in growth (25 +/− 5%)[37]
AC/DC EF100/10 mAIncrease in growth, organic acid production and cell budding[38]
MW42GHz@ < 3 mWcm–2Frequency dependent increase or decrease in growth[39]
6-polar ACEF1 kHzIncrease in gas production (195 ± 20%)[13,14]
OMF0.5 μT, 100200 Hz30% reduction in respiration[40]
SMF7.28 TBetter UV survival; Stimulation of respiration[41] [42]
S. fragilisSMF~0.26 TIncrease in growth (27–36%)[15]
Kluyveromyces marxianusPEF0.25 kVIncreased ethanol production and cellobiose utilization[43]
Physarum polycephalumOMF45,60,75 HzDelayed mitosis by 0.5 to 2 h[44]
OMF0.1 mT, 60 HzLower ATP levels but no decreased respiration[45,46]
0.2 mT and 60 and 75 HzReduced respiration
Protozoa
Trichomonas vaginalisSMFField strength dependent growth stimulation/inhibition[47]
Ciliophora
Paramecium tetraureliaOMF1.8 mT, 72 HzIncrease in cell division rates; Alterations in membrane fluidity[48]
Tetrahymena pyriformisOMF10 mT, 60 HzDelayed cell division and increased oxygen uptake[49]
*AC-EF: alternating current electric field; DC-EF: direct current electric field; MW: microwave; OMF: oscillating magnetic field; SMF: static magnetic field; PEF: pulsed electric field; PMF: pulsed magnetic field.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers.

References

  1. Hunt, RW; Zavalin, A; Bhatnagar, A; Chinnasamy, S; Das, KC. Electromagnetic Biostimulation of Living Cultures for Biotechnology, Biofuel and Bioenergy Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2009, 10, 4515–4558. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hunt, R.W.; Zavalin, A.; Bhatnagar, A.; Chinnasamy, S.; Das, K.C. Correction: Hunt, R.W. et al. Electromagnetic Biostimulation of Living Cultures for Biotechnology, Biofuel and Bioenergy Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4515-4558. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4719-4722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10114719

AMA Style

Hunt RW, Zavalin A, Bhatnagar A, Chinnasamy S, Das KC. Correction: Hunt, R.W. et al. Electromagnetic Biostimulation of Living Cultures for Biotechnology, Biofuel and Bioenergy Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4515-4558. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2009; 10(11):4719-4722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10114719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hunt, Ryan W., Andrey Zavalin, Ashish Bhatnagar, Senthil Chinnasamy, and Keshav C. Das. 2009. "Correction: Hunt, R.W. et al. Electromagnetic Biostimulation of Living Cultures for Biotechnology, Biofuel and Bioenergy Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4515-4558" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 10, no. 11: 4719-4722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10114719

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop