Next Article in Journal
Risk-Association of CYP11A1 Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Among Han Chinese Women in Southern China
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Immunomodulation Effect of Isodon japonicus Extract via Splenocyte Function and NK Anti-Tumor Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Eighteen Microsatellite Markers in Anemone amurensis (Ranunculaceae) and Cross-Amplification in Congeneric Species

Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(4), 4889-4895; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13044889
Submission received: 10 February 2012 / Revised: 11 April 2012 / Accepted: 11 April 2012 / Published: 18 April 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
Polyploidy plays an important role in the evolution of plant genomes. To enable the investigation of the polyploidy events within the genus Anemone, we developed eighteen microsatellite markers from the hexaploid species A. amurensis (Ranunculaceae), and tested their transferability in five closely related species. The number of total alleles (NA) for each resulting locus varied from one to eight. The polymorphism information content (PIC) and Nei’s genetic diversity (NGD) for these microsatellites ranged from 0.00 to 0.71 and 0.00 to 0.91, respectively. For each population, the NA was one to seven, and the values of PIC and NGD varied from 0.00 to 0.84 and 0.00 to 0.95, respectively. In addition, most of these microsatellites can be amplified successfully in the congeneric species. These microsatellite primers provide us an opportunity to study the polyploid evolution in the genus Anemone.

1. Introduction

Polyploidy has been recognized as a pervasive force in plant evolution, and more than half of flowering plants ultimately have a polyploid ancestry [1,2]. Those polyploidy events therefore contributed greatly to the diversification and evolution of angiosperms [3,4]. In this study, in order to evaluate the polyploidy events within the genus Anemone, we investigated an annual herbaceous plant of northeastern China, namely Anemone amurensis Kom. (Ranunculaceae). According to previous studies, the species within the genus Anemone not only show high morphological diversity, but also occupy a wide range of habitats, including alpine tundra, woodlands and semidesert [5,6]. It is demonstrated that the species within the genus Anemone has been reported to encompass diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid chromosomal races [5,7,8]. For example, although the species A. amurensis has a hexaploid genome, its closely related species were found to have diploid and tetraploid genomes. These attributes indicate that the genus Anemone is an ideal system to study polyploidy. Nonetheless, studies of polyploidy in this genus are still limited due to the lack of suitable and efficient molecular markers. Microsatellite markers are appropriate candidates for studying this non-model species as they are highly polymorphic and co-dominant. We therefore developed eighteen microsatellite markers from A. amurensis and tested their transferability in other congeneric species. These microsatellites provide us with an opportunity to study polyploidy events within the genus Anemone.

2. Results and Discussion

In total, 106 positive clones were sequenced on an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), of which 74 clones were found to have microsatellite motifs. Thirty-three of these clones were chosen to design primer pairs, and 18 of these produced single clean amplicons of the expected size (Table 1). The Genbank accession numbers, primer sequences, repeat motifs, size of cloned allele, annealing temperature, number of alleles (NA), Nei’s genetic diversity (NGD) and polymorphism information content (PIC) can be found listed in Table 1.
Polymorphism and transferability of the 18 microsatellite loci were assessed in 52 individuals of A. amurensis and five other closely related species. According to the results, 11 of these microsatellites exhibited polymorphic patterns in the species A. amurensis. NA for each locus was between one and eight, and the values of PIC and NGD for each locus varied from 0.00 to 0.71 and 0.00 to 0.91, respectively (Table 1). In addition, the NA for each population ranged from one to seven, and the values of PIC and NGD for each population varied from 0.00 to 0.84 and 0.00 to 0.95, respectively (Table 2). Only the locus HS199 showed a significant departure (p < 0.01) from HWE under the diploid model and no significantly (p < 0.01) linkage disequilibrium was detected for any pair of loci. For cross-amplification, eight, nine, 13, 14 and 17 of these microsatellites successfully amplified the target regions in four individuals of each of the species A. silvestris, A. raddeana, A. cathayensis, A. umbrosa and A. reflexa, respectively (Table 3). The NA of these markers in the five congeneric species ranged from one to five.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Isolation of Microsatellite Markers

Genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaves of one individual of A. amurensis (voucher specimen: NENU20110420001) using the Plant Genomic DNA kit (TianGen, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Genomic libraries enriched for microsatellite motifs were constructed as described in detail in Zane et al. [9]. Briefly, about 300 ng of genomic DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme Mse I (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) and ligated to double-stranded linkers (5′-TACCAGGACTCAT-3′/5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG-3′) with T4 ligase (Fermentas, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) [10]. Then, the diluted disgestion-ligation mixture (1:10) was amplified using MseI-N (5′-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAAN-3′) as primer. The following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) temperature profile was used: 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 20 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min. The reaction mixture contained 1.2 ng diluted disgestion-ligation DNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 2.5 mM Mg2+, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1 μM of the MseI-N primer and 1 U of Taq polymerase (Takara, Liaoning, China).
For enrichment, the PCR products were denatured and hybridized to the 5′-biotinylated oligo probe (AC)15 and these DNA molecules containing microsatellite motifs were captured by streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). These recovered DNA fragments were amplified with MseI-N primer and the composition of the PCR reaction mixture as well as the PCR cycling conditions were the same as described above. These PCR products were then ligated into the pMD-18 vector (Takara) and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells (Takara). The positive clones were picked out and tested by PCR using (AC)10 and M13+/M13− as primers, respectively. The PCRs were set up in total volumes of 15 μL, containing 2 μL template DNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 2.5 mM Mg2+, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.5 μM of each primer and 1 U of Taq polymerase (Takara). The following PCR cycling profile was used: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. These clones with sufficient flanking regions (at least 30 base pair in length) were chosen to design primer pairs using the Primer Premier software ( http://www.premierbiosoft.com). The conditions of primer designing were performed according to Li et al. [11], and each forward primer was fluorescent labeled with either FAM or HEX (Invitrogen, Beijing, China).

3.2. Detection of Polymorphism and Data Analysis

Polymorphism was tested in 52 individuals from three populations of A. amurensis (Langxiang, 47.062° N, 128.886° E, voucher specimen: NENU20110430001; Dunhua, 43.809° N, 128.120° E, voucher specimen: NENU20110420002; Kuandian, 41.337° N, 124.825° E, voucher specimen: NENU20110426019), and the transferability of these markers were assessed in four individuals of each A. raddeana Regel. (voucher specimen: NENU20110426011), A. silvestris L. (voucher specimen: NENU20110525009), A. umbrosa Mey (voucher specimen: NENU20110512003), A. reflexa Stephan (voucher specimen: NENU20110512008), and A. cathayensis Kitag (voucher specimen: NENU20110422001) (Table 2). Amplification reactions were carried out in 20 μL reaction volume containing 50 ng template DNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 2.5 mM Mg2+, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.5 μM of each forward and reverse primer, and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Takara). PCR amplifications were conducted on an ABI2720 Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturing at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at the annealing temperature for each designed specific primer, 30 s at 72 °C; and finally 8 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were resolved on an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The NA and PIC were calculated for each primer pair and population according to Botstein et al. [12]. In addition, the Nei’s genetic diversity (also known as expected heterozygosity) was calculated using the software GENOTYPE AND GENODIVE [13]. Furthermore, the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between loci and deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were tested for each locus according to Saltonstall [14] using Fisher exact tests with GENEPOP [15].

4. Conclusions

The eighteen microsatellite loci developed in this study provide us with an initial set of molecular markers to investigate the genetic diversity and spatial population genetic structure of A. amurensis. In addition, most of these markers showed transferability to closely related species, suggesting their usefulness to study polyploidy events in the genus Anemone.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions to improve this manuscript. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31100157 and 31170429) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (10QNJJ011).

References

  1. Wood, T.E.; Takebayashi, N.; Barker, M.S.; Mayrose, I.; Greenspoon, P.B.; Rieseberg, L.H. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13875–13879. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, K.L.; Wendel, J.F. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 2005, 8, 135–141. [Google Scholar]
  3. Soltis, D.E.; Albert, V.A.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Bell, C.D.; Paterson, A.H.; Zheng, C.; Sankoff, D.; de Pamphilis, C.W.; Wall, P.K.; Soltis, P.S. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot 2009, 96, 336–348. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jiao, Y.; Wickett, N.J.; Ayyampalayam, S.; Chanderbali, A.S.; Landherr, L.; Ralph, P.E.; Tomsho, L.P.; Hu, Y.; Liang, H.; Soltis, P.S.; et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473, 97–100. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gregory, W.C. Phylogenetic and cytological studies in the Ranunculaceae Juss. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc 1941, 31, 443–521. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoot, S.B.; Jeffrey, A.A.R.; Palmer, D. Phylogenetic relationships in Anemone (Ranunculaceae) based on morphology and chloroplast DNA. Syst. Bot 1994, 19, 169–200. [Google Scholar]
  7. Heimburger, M. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Anemone. Can. J. Bot 1959, 37, 587–612. [Google Scholar]
  8. Heimburger, M. Comparison of chromosome size in species of anemone and their hybrids. Chromosoma 1962, 13, 328–340. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zane, L.; Bargelloni, L.; Patarnello, T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: A review. Mol. Ecol 2002, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vos, P.; Hogers, R.; Bleeker, M.; Reijans, M.; Lee, T.; Hornes, M.; Friters, A.; Pot, J.; Paleman, J.; Kuiper, M.; Zabeau, M. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23, 4407–4414. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, L.F.; Pang, D.; Liao, Q.L.; Xiao, H.X. Genomic and EST microsatellite markers for Aquilegia flabellata and cross-amplification in A. oxysepala (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot 2011, 98, e213–e215. [Google Scholar]
  12. Botstein, D.; White, D.L.; Skolnick, M.; Davis, R.W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Amer. J. Hum. Genet 1980, 32, 314–331. [Google Scholar]
  13. Meirmans, P.G.; van Tienderen, P.H. Genotype and genodive: Two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 792–794. [Google Scholar]
  14. Saltonstall, K. Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis. Mol. Ecol 2003, 12, 1689–1702. [Google Scholar]
  15. Raymond, M.; Rousset, F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered 1995, 86, 248–249. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Characteristics of 18 microsatellites for Anemone amurensis. Shown for each primer are the loci names, forward (F) and reverse (R) primer sequence, repeat motif (Repeat), size of cloned allele (Size), annealing temperature (Ta), Nei’s genetic diversity (NGD), number of alleles for each locus (NA), polymorphism information content (PIC) and GenBank accession numbers (GenBank). NGD marked with an asterisk indicates significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p < 0.01).
Table 1. Characteristics of 18 microsatellites for Anemone amurensis. Shown for each primer are the loci names, forward (F) and reverse (R) primer sequence, repeat motif (Repeat), size of cloned allele (Size), annealing temperature (Ta), Nei’s genetic diversity (NGD), number of alleles for each locus (NA), polymorphism information content (PIC) and GenBank accession numbers (GenBank). NGD marked with an asterisk indicates significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p < 0.01).
PrimerPrimer sequences (5′-3′)RepeatSize (bp)TaNANGDPICGenBank
BH84F: TTGCCATGGACCAATACTCG
R:GTCAGTGCAAGAAAGTAGCTGC
(TG)91724860.910.59JQ518375
BH86F: CAACCTTGCAAACCCCCTCA
R: CAAAAGTCGTCGTCACCTCC
(TG)162094840.820.71JQ518376
BH112F: GCATAAGGAGTAGTCATTTCA
R: CCGCAAAGGTATATATATGTG
(AC)212185210.000.00JQ518377
BH206F: TGTTGTTTCCCTTACTTGCC
R: CATCTTATGTCACACTTGGG
(GT)22A
(TG)14
1574860.500.36JQ518378
BH235F: CATGGCCATTGGTATCAAAC
R: TTGGTGGAACAACTTAGCCC
(GT)5A
(TG)16
1564870.840.69JQ518379
HS27F: GGAAGCATCATCTCACCTAC
R: TTCTAGTTTTGACTGGGAGG
(AC)71825040.660.71JQ518380
HS37F: ACACAGATTCCACTCACCAC
R: ACCATATTAGGCATCTCGGG
(TC)7
(AC)10
1985080.870.57JQ518381
HS47F: CACACGCAAACAGAAACACA
R: GCTTGAGGTTTCATGATACAG
(TG)223095010.000.00JQ518382
HS60F: CATCATGTGCATTGGTGTCT
R: GATGCTAGGAGACCAGTCTA
(GT)181545010.000.00JQ518383
HS117F: GAACACATCATTCATAGAGC
R: TCCGATACAGTTTGACACTT
(GT)62845010.000.00JQ518384
HS177F: GAAAATGTGACCGTCCCTAC
R: TGTCATTGGCTCACCACCTT
(AC)71944830.520.61JQ518385
HS191F: GGAGAGTGGTGTAATACCCG
R: ACACTGATGTGGGCAAGGTC
(TG)212724810.000.00JQ518386
HS199F: GAGTGGAAGATCTGTGCAGG
R: AGTGTGGGGTGAAACTCCTA
(CA)81995070.86 *0.70JQ518387
HS256F: CTGTTCCTCCGATGGCGTTT
R: ACCTTACCCTTCCCCTCTTC
(TG)72115050.760.50JQ518388
HS263F: ACCAACTCACACACCAAATA
R: GATCGTGATGACAAGGAGAA
(TG)72995010.000.00JQ518389
HS283F: ATGAGATGGGGATTTATGCC
R: CCTTTCGGGCTTTACAACCT
(GT)61835010.000.00JQ518390
HS316F: ACTTGGGAGGTTGTTTTTGG
R: CAAACTTGACTCGACACCTC
(TG)61895040.740.54JQ518391
HS321F: TGTGGAGGAAGAAGATGGTC
R: GAGTGCCGCAAGATTGACAT
(CA)83215240.900.61JQ518392
Table 2. Results of initial primer screening in Anemone amurensis. Parameters shown for each pair of primer are the number of the samples (N), number of alleles (NA), Nei’s genetic diversity (NGD) and polymorphism information content (PIC).
Table 2. Results of initial primer screening in Anemone amurensis. Parameters shown for each pair of primer are the number of the samples (N), number of alleles (NA), Nei’s genetic diversity (NGD) and polymorphism information content (PIC).
LocusKuandian (N = 15)Langxiang (N = 20)Dunhua (N = 17)
NANGDPICNANGDPICNANGDPIC
BH8450.870.7160.840.6750.940.57
BH8640.410.6540.860.7140.700.68
BH11210.000.0010.000.0010.000.00
BH20660.520.8360.000.8360.540.84
BH23550.000.2560.930.6470.810.75
HS2740.850.7330.230.6640.670.70
HS3770.900.6850.870.4640.780.55
HS4710.000.0010.000.0010.000.00
HS6010.000.0010.000.0010.000.00
HS11710.000.0010.000.0010.000.00
HS17720.170.5030.660.5430.000.65
HS19110.000.0010.000.0010.000.00
HS19940.800.7350.910.7640.770.50
HS25630.950.4550.670.5040.810.53
HS26310.000.0010.000.0010.000.00
HS28310.000.0010.000.0010.000.00
HS31630.690.4830.790.6640.670.47
HS32130.670.4940.710.3840.880.66
Table 3. Cross-species amplification of the 18 microsatellite markers in five other species of the genus Anemone. For each primer pair, the number of individuals tested (N), monomorphic (M), polymorphic and number of alleles (P) and no-specific product (-) are given.
Table 3. Cross-species amplification of the 18 microsatellite markers in five other species of the genus Anemone. For each primer pair, the number of individuals tested (N), monomorphic (M), polymorphic and number of alleles (P) and no-specific product (-) are given.
LocusA. raddeana (N = 4)A. silvestris (N = 4)A. umbrosa (N = 4)A. reflexa (N = 4)A. cathayensis (N = 4)
BH84P (3)P (3)P (2)P (2)P (3)
BH86-----
BH112MMMMM
BH206-P (4)P (4)P (2)P (5)
BH235P (4)P (4)P (4)P (5)-
HS27-MMM-
HS37--MP (2)P (2)
HS47--P (2)MM
HS60--MM-
HS117MMMMM
HS177--P (2)P (2)P (2)
HS191MMMMM
HS199---P (2)M
HS256P (5)--P (2)P (3)
HS263P (2)MP (2)P (2)P (2)
HS283M-MMM
HS316---P (2)-
HS321P (2)-P (2)P (2)P (3)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, M.; Yin, X.; Shi, F.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Li, L.; Xiao, H. Development of Eighteen Microsatellite Markers in Anemone amurensis (Ranunculaceae) and Cross-Amplification in Congeneric Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 4889-4895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13044889

AMA Style

Sun M, Yin X, Shi F, Li L, Li M, Li L, Xiao H. Development of Eighteen Microsatellite Markers in Anemone amurensis (Ranunculaceae) and Cross-Amplification in Congeneric Species. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012; 13(4):4889-4895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13044889

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Mingzhou, Xiao Yin, Fengxue Shi, Lin Li, Mingrui Li, Linfeng Li, and Hongxing Xiao. 2012. "Development of Eighteen Microsatellite Markers in Anemone amurensis (Ranunculaceae) and Cross-Amplification in Congeneric Species" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, no. 4: 4889-4895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13044889

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop