Next Article in Journal
Ultra Wide-Band Localization and SLAM: A Comparative Study for Mobile Robot Navigation
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of a Microbial Biosensor Based on QD-MWNT Supports by a One-Step Radiation Reaction and Detection of Phenolic Compounds in Red Wines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Energy Saving Effects of Wireless Sensor Networks: A Case Study of Convenience Stores in Taiwan

1
Graduate Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, No.1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei City, 106, Taiwan
2
Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, No.1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei City, 106, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2011, 11(2), 2013-2034; https://doi.org/10.3390/s110202013
Submission received: 15 December 2010 / Revised: 4 January 2011 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 / Published: 10 February 2011
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

: Wireless sensor network (WSN) technology has been successfully applied to energy saving applications in many places, and plays a significant role in achieving power conservation. However, previous studies do not discuss WSN costs and cost-recovery. The application of WSNs is currently limited to research and laboratory experiments, and not mass industrial production, largely because business owners are unfamiliar with the possible favorable return and cost-recovery on WSN investments. Therefore, this paper focuses on the cost-recovery of WSNs and how to reduce air conditioning energy consumption in convenience stores. The WSN used in this study provides feedback to the gateway and adopts the predicted mean vote (PMV) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods to allow customers to shop in a comfortable yet energy-saving environment. Four convenience stores in Taipei have used the proposed WSN since 2008. In 2008, the experiment was initially designed to optimize air-conditioning for energy saving, but additions to the set-up continued beyond 2008, adding the thermal comfort and crowds peak, off-peak features in 2009 to achieve human-friendly energy savings. Comparison with 2007 data, under the same comfort conditions, shows that the power savings increased by 40% (2008) and 53% (2009), respectively. The cost of the WSN equipment was 500 US dollars. Experimental results, including three years of analysis and calculations, show that the marginal energy conservation benefit of the four convenience stores achieved energy savings of up to 53%, recovering all costs in approximately 5 months. The convenience store group participating in this study was satisfied with the efficiency of energy conservation because of the short cost-recovery period.

1. Introduction

Wireless sensor networks have been developed for many applications [13], including home energy conservation, environmental monitoring, and machinery sensor monitoring. Sensors produced by semiconductor manufacturing and integrated-circuit manufacture have the advantage of low-cost [4], making possible the application of wireless sensor networks to energy conservation problems. Wireless sensor networks that implement intelligent surveillance and energy management can contribute to achieving an intelligent and comfortable shopping space and help attain the goal of intelligent living technology.

Three technological innovations, namely integrated circuit (IC) sensors, wireless communication technology, and energy harvesting chips are a key to the success of these applications. IC technology has greatly reduced the cost of manufacturing sensors. Wireless communication technology can obviate the inconvenience created by the cable configurations of sensors, allowing sensor networks to be more practicable [59]. The stray energy in convenience stores includes thermal, vibration, and indoor light sources. As Table 1 shows, the highest energy density involves light sources [1012], therefore, these are the main focus of this study. Energy harvesting chips [14] convert light sources into effective electric power that drives distributed sensors. This design also helps prevent pollution from disposed batteries. A photovoltaic cell with a harvesting chip, IC sensor, and wireless communication components can create a “deploy and forget” sensor network that efficiently decreases maintenance and operation costs.

The WSN is an indispensable element in achieving the energy conservation goals. In this study, several sensors scattered throughout the space of a convenience store were connected to a network to detect physical environmental measurements, air conditioning control parameters, and the status of power distribution panels and customers as a basis for energy conservation.

Previous studies have shown that in light powered wireless networks the cross correlation between the results of Predicted Mean Vote (PMV), an index of human thermal comfort, and a comfort sensing vote by people is as high as 95% [13]. After installing the WSN, air conditioning a convenience store using the rules that PMV provides can achieve optimal operation for energy saving control. This method also achieves the highest energy efficiency, at 54% [14,15]. The successful energy conservation strategy in this study is based on an understanding of the usage and status of equipment power consumption.

2. Wireless Sensor Network

The thermal flow sensor network in convenience stores combines the thermal comfort of man (Man) and air conditioning (Machine) to achieve adaptively-adjusted energy management that can establish instant communication and control [5,1618] and achieve an optimal thermal comfort level. The common sensor types for convenience stores include temperature, relative humidity, air flow, and illumination sensor nodes. The framework of a sensor star network includes sensors and a gateway located on the store ceiling. Using wireless communication, sensor nodes pass information to a gateway and a computer then calculates the range of PMV index, identifying temperature and fan speed modulation for achieving optimal air conditioning control. Figure 1 shows the logical control of the air conditioning energy conservation system.

2.1. Sensor Nodes Wireless Charging and Sensor Components

A convenience store is a typically bright location that is able to provide enough light power to charge powerless wireless sensor nodes, allowing them to collect and transfer information, as Figure 2 shows. Photovoltaic cells provided power to the sensor nodes. Under exterior light irradiation, each photovoltaic cell produced an open-circuit voltage of Voc; the voltage source connected the load and work producing close-circuit current was Isc. The current passed through the p-n junction, causing the diffusion current loss Id [19]. The current passing through the load was:

I L = I SC I d

An ideal diode equation estimated the Id value:

I d = I SC A · e qV OC KT 1

In Equation (2), q is electronic charge, Voc is open-circuit voltage, A is a constant factor of voltage with a value of one in positive bias and two in negative bias, K is the Boltzmann constant, and T is absolute temperature. Current passing through the photovoltaic cell circuit caused a loss of Id and a rise in temperature.

The power generating rate of photovoltaic cells with energy harvesting chips provided an efficient power supply for the WSN nodes. A micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) consisting of a micro-solenoid and a ferrite core filled with nanoferrofluids had no air gap and low iron loss, increasing the power conversion efficiency to more than 95% [20]. A comparison with photovoltaic cells shows that using energy harvesting chips to harvest ambient light energy by connecting photovoltaic cell circuits in a parallel manner was 10% more efficient, and energy harvesting chip enhanced the high slew rate current, as Figure 3 shows.

Table 2 lists the measurement range and power consumptions of each wireless sensor node [2123]. Experiment measurements indicate that the sensor nodes power output was 150 mW. The illumination of a convenience store is typically 1,000 lux, which is more than enough to provide power wireless sensor nodes. This architecture is the technical foundation of this study.

2.2. WSN Wireless Data Transmission

Wireless communication networks can sometimes lose communication data due to electromagnetic interference. Though this study uses wireless charging for sensor nodes, interior lighting can be shaded by customer movements, causing malfunctions in remote nodes and a loss of measurement data. Thus, a maximum entropy method was adopted at the back end of the communication module to receive sensor node data and integrate the data. The maximum entropy method is based on relevant measured values and can be decided by previous measured values or by errors in white noise patterns, as Equation (3) shows [24]:

X n = m 1 M a m X n m + E n

In Equation (3), En is the error value in the white noise pattern, Xn−m is the previously measured value, am is the weighting coefficient, Xn is the relevant measure value, and M is the number of predicted data points.

Multiplying all items in Equation (3) by Xn:

X n X n + a 1 X n 1 X n + a 2 X n 2 X n + + a M X n M X n = E X n

Equation (4) expands n times on time; giving an expanded polynomial as below:

C xx ( 0 ) + a 1 C xx ( 1 ) + a 2 C xx ( 2 ) + + a M C xx ( M ) = P

In Equation (5), Cxx is the discrete autocorrelation of X with the time migration from 0 to M, and P is the estimated error power. Expanding Xn−k migration upon time instead of all items in Formula (3) leads to the following results:

C xx ( k ) + a 1 C xx ( k 1 ) + a 2 C xx ( k 2 ) + + a M C xx ( k M ) = 0

A comparison of Equation (5) and Equation (6) shows that white noise caused errors in the relevant measurement, and the method of multiplying measurements also multiplied the error. Previously, the error yielding correlation in white noise patterns was zero. Combining Equation (5) and Equation (6) and expanding the formulas on time migration k yields the following matrix:

[ C xx ( 0 ) C xx ( 1 ) C xx ( M ) C xx ( 1 ) C xx ( 0 ) C xx ( M 1 ) C xx ( M ) C xx ( M 1 ) C xx ( 0 ) ] [ 1 a 1 a M ] = [ P 0 0 ]

Equation (7) obtains all weighting coefficients. If any measurement parameters were lost within a certain time period, they were estimated using the following equation:

f p = i = 0 M a i X n i ( M + 1 n N ,     a 0 = 1 )

In Equation (8), fp is the forward prediction, M is the number of predicted data points, ai is the weighting coefficient (assuming the initial value is 1), and Xn−i is the previously measured value; the boundary starts M + 1 until N.

The term fp predicts missing data when sensor nodes fail to collect temperature, relative humidity, illumination, or air flow. After recording data, the proposed model considers error estimation and adjusts continually. This system identification and autocorrelation during calculation removes noise interference. The calculation results in this study achieved precise data estimation.

2.3. WSN PMV Measurement

The PMV calculation method uses distributed sensor nodes to count the number of customers based on customer clothing and activity. PMV includes six parameters: temperature, irradiation temperature, relative humidity, air flow, clothing and activity, and appears as Equation (9) below [2529]:

PMV = 0.303 e 0.36 M + 0.028 { ( M W ) 3.05 × 10 3 [ 5733 6.99 ( M W ) ] P a 0.42 [ ( M W ) 58.15 ] 1.7 × 10 5 M ( 5867 P a ) 0.0014 M ( 34 T a ) 3.96 × 10 8   f cl [ ( T cl + 273 ) 4 ( T r + 273 ) 4 ] f cl h c ( T cl T a ) }
in which:
T cl = 35.7 0.028 ( M W ) I cl { 3.96 × 10 8 f cl [ ( T cl + 273 ) 4 ( T r + 273 ) 4 ] f cl h c ( T cl T a ) } h c = 2.38 ( T cl T a ) 0.25     for     2.38 ( T cl T a ) 0.25 12.1 V a 12.1 V a for     2.38 ( T cl T a ) 0.25 12.1 V a f cl = 1.00 + 1.29 I cl         for     I cl 0.078 m 2   ° C W 1 2.1 V a         for     I cl 0.078 m 2   ° C W 1

In Equation (9), fcl is the surface coefficient of clothes, M is the metabolic rate of human bodies (W m−2), W is the outward work rate (Wm−2), Icl is the insulation value of clothing (m2°CW1), Pa is partial vapor pressure (Pa), Ta is room temperature (°C), Tr is the average temperature of irradiation (°C), Va is air flow (m−1), hc is the convective heat loss coefficient (Wm−2°C−1), and Tcl is the clothing surface temperature (°C).

Distribution sensor nodes record data and measure temperature, relative humidity, air flow, and radiation temperature. Activities (for instance, walking) and clothing (as worn during the summer) are based on ISO 7730 [26]. The aforementioned equations revealed that the distributed PMV index ranged from +3 (hot) to −3 (cold), as Table 3 shows.

The WSNs collected physical measurements such as temperature, relative humidity, illumination, and air flow from each sensor node. Wireless sensor nodes were placed at intersections where cool air emitted from ceiling air conditioning vents and showcases mixed with hot air emitted from a cooking zone, coffee machines, and a store entrance, as Figure 4 shows. The cold and hot intersections were the locations where humans felt the largest difference. Through wireless communication, the system acquired the PMV index to achieve optimal thermal comfort in convenience stores.

Figure 5 shows the average summer indoor temperature distribution of the four convenience stores participating in this study. The results in Figure 5 were calculated by CFD simulation, based on temperature measurements from each wireless sensor node in four convenience stores. Simulation temperature boundaries were determined according to the aforementioned collection information.

3. Application of CFD to Convenience Stores

The experiments in this study measured energy conservation results before and after installing the WSNs in convenience stores where both WSNs and CFD were adopted. The experiments in this study used Airpak 3.0 [30], a CFD simulation program for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC). Table S1 shows the governing equations for this program. The convenience store indoor temperature variable affected the range of PMV indexes. In this study, heat source and cold air were established as parameters in the CFD simulation. The size of convenience stores and the heat sources are generated from outdoor air, coffee machines, a photocopier, a multi-function business machine, a refrigerator, cooking zone, and an ATM. The cold air comes from two air conditioning units.

3.1. Applying CFD to Convenience Stores

As Figure 6 shows, the experiments in this study applied CFD to four convenience stores and performed comparative analyses to judge the correlation, simulation and measurement results. The experimental setup used a linear measurement of temperature points from the entrance of stores, with one meter intervals, and a height of 1.5 meters from the ground as measurement points. The correlation R values of the four convenience stores ranged from 0.8859 ∼ 0.9836, demonstrating that the simulation was relatively accurate and reliable.

Each convenience store was influenced differently by the store location, orientation, and the distribution of equipment in the store. These variables produced different indoor temperature distributions, as shown in Figures 7 and 8, which illustrate the simulated day and night distribution of indoor temperatures for the four stores prior to installing a WSN.

Figure 7(a) shows that the indoor temperature distribution in Store A was the highest among the four stores. Limiting the power consumption of air conditioning could save energy, but the PMV index at noon was +0.8, indicating an uncomfortable environment. Thus, power conservation was only adopted under comfortable conditions to avoid making customers feel uncomfortable. Stores B, C, and D had cooler, more comfortable conditions. Air conditioning power management was necessary to achieve a comfortable and energy saving shopping environment.

3.2. Applying WSN and CFD to the Energy Conservation of Air Conditioning in Convenience Stores

Figure 4 shows the distribution of WSN sensor nodes. The nodes were placed at intersections of cool and warm air, such as doors, a cooking zone, and a showcase zone, to determine the energy saving effects by day and night.

A comfortable environment in convenience stores is influenced by the number of customers, showcases, appliances in the cooking zone, and solar radiation. To maintain comfortable conditions, convenience stores should implement energy conservation practices to suit real store situations, in addition to using inverter air conditioning in compliance with governmental policy [31].

Figures 9 and 10 present the CFD results for the WSNs installed in the convenience stores at noon and night. Unlike the results in Figures 7 and 8, store A had more air flow and a lower indoor temperature at noon, while stores B, C, and D had higher indoor temperatures. Due to the presence of fewer customers at night, the WSN turned the air conditioning located near the showcase zone to fan mode only, and set the other air conditioning to a lower fan speed and 26 °C. The indoor temperature was controlled at approximately 24 to 26 °C. Figure 11 demonstrates that the PMV values of four convenience stores with WSN maintained a neutral value +0.4, which is a comfortable and energy-conserving environment.

Figure 12 shows that the customers in the four convenience stores were primarily distributed from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm, with crowds peaking at noon and decreasing at night. The electronic power usage of air conditioning equipment in four convenience stores was limited by the WSN. Figure 13 shows the daily average of summer power conversation efficiency for the WSNs installed in the stores, indicating that the number of customers affected the air conditioning power consumption. The experimental data further showed that power usage peaks at noon, implying that the power usage of air conditioning is affected by the sunset and the daily weather. Compared 2008 data with 2007 data, the power usage of Stores A, B, C and D decreased by 10%, 32%, 21%, and 19 % respectively after installing the WSN.

4. Analysis of Marginal Energy Conservation Benefit of WSN

A wireless sensor network (WSN) was installed in four convenience stores in Taipei City in 2008 to record indoor temperature, relative humidity, air velocity, and illumination values. Figure 14 shows that for Store B, air conditioning optimization achieved a 40% increase in energy conservation compared with the 2007 baseline. Additions to the set-up continued beyond 2008, adding the thermal comfort and crowds peak, off-peak features to achieve human-friendly energy savings in 2009.

Under this condition, the system achieved 53% air conditioning energy conservation. In 2010, the same operating method as 2009, the energy conservation was again 53%. These experiment results show that 53% was the maximum energy conservation for store B, and the highest marginal energy conservation benefit among all four stores.

Figure 15 shows that the air conditioning energy conservation for all four convenience stores in 2008 had increased 34.5% from 2007 and 11% from 2008 to 2009; however, the air conditioning energy conservation in 2010 only increased 0.75% and its trend curve approached a horizontal line. This reveals a limit to the growth of air conditioning power conservation.

Table 4 shows the cost of installing a wireless sensor network in a convenience store. Each convenience store requires three temperature sensors, two humidity sensors, two air velocity sensors, one illumination sensor, and one gateway. The basic cost is 500 US dollars, and depending on how the sensor nodes are arranged, the cost-recovery period is 3 to 6 months.

Figure 16 shows that the proposed wireless sensor networks have been functioning since July 2008. The first four months, July to October, exhibited the greatest cost-recovery, amounting to almost full cost-recovery. Though the cooler weather in the fifth month caused a cost-recovery slowdown, most of the costs had already been recovered.

5. Conclusions

The experiments in this study prove that WSNs monitoring air conditioning in convenience stores have successfully achieved energy conservation since 2008. The proposed multiple-node wireless sensor networks (WSNs) reduced the electric power usage of air conditioning by 20% in summer, based on optimal operation and crowd-peak or off-peak conditions. The thermal comfort of the predicted mean vote (PMV) was +0.4, reflecting a comfortable yet energy-conserving shopping environment.

This study uses the Airpak CFD software to calculate and simulate the indoor temperature distribution, and used these results to analyze the placement of equipment where in the convenience store in relation to the store entrance. This study also determines that the marginal energy conservation benefits for the four convenience stores that installed a WSN in 2008 was that the average air conditioning equipment power conservation was 45.5% per year. The cost of the WSN installations was approximately 500 US dollars. The cost-recovery period ranged from 3 to 6 mouths, depending on the size of the convenience store. This results show that the proposed WSN technique is a great strategy for achieving energy conservation and a comfortable shopping environment.

Nomenclature:

Photovoltaic cell
Isc

Closed-circuit voltage (V)

Id

Diffusion current loss (I)

Voc

Open-circuit voltage (V)

A

Constant factor of voltage

K

Boltzmann constant

T

Absolute temperature (K)

Predicted mean vote (PMV)
fcl

Surface coefficient of clothes

M

Metabolic rate of human bodies (Wm−2)

W

Outward work rate (Wm−2)

Icl

Insulation value of clothing (m2°CW1)

Pa

Partial vapor pressure (Pa)

Ta

Room temperature (°C)

Tr

Average temperature of irradiation (°C)

Va

Air flow (m−1)

hc

Convective heat loss coefficient (Wm−2°C−1)

Tcl

Clothing surface temperature (°C)

Measurement value
Te

Measurement temperature (°C)

v

Measurement air flow (ms−1)

RH

Measurement relative humidity (%)

Acknowledgments

The authors deeply appreciate the financial support provided by National Science Council in Taiwan under the grant number of NSC 98-3114-E-002-002-CC3.

References

  1. Shwe, H.Y.; Jiang, X.H.; Horiguchi, S. Energy saving in wireless sensor networks. Comm. Comput 2009, 6, 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pensas, H.; Raula, H.; Vanhala, J. Energy efficient sensor network with service discovery for smart home environments. Sensor technologies and applications. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications, Athens, Greece, 18–23 June 2009; pp. 399–404.
  3. Yeh, L.W.; Wang, Y.C.; Tseng, Y.C. iPower: An energy conservation system for intelligent buildings by wireless sensor networks. Sens. Netw 2009, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yurish, S.Y.; Kirianaki, N.V.; Myshkin, I.L. World sensors and MEMS markets: Analysis and trends. Sens. Transducers Mag 2005, 62, 456–461. [Google Scholar]
  5. Viswanathan, R.; Varshney, P.K. Distributed detection with multiple sensors: Part I—fundamentals. Proc. IEEE 1997, 85, 54–63. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tang, Z.B.; Pattipati, K.R.; Kleinman, D.L. Optimization of distributed detection networks: Part II generalized tree structures. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern 1993, 23, 211–221. [Google Scholar]
  7. Megalooikonomou, V.; Yesha, Y. Quantizer design for distributed estimation with communication constraints and unknown observation statistics. IEEE Trans. Commun 2000, 48, 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pados, D.A.; Halford, K.W.; Kazakos, D.; Papantoni-Kazakos, P. Distributed binary hypothesis testing with feedback. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern 1995, 25, 21–42. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomopoulos, S.C.A.; Zhang, L. Distributed decision fusion with networking delays and channel errors. Inform. Sci 1992, 66, 91–118. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rowe, D.M. Thermoelectrics, an environmentally-friendly source of electrical power. Renewable Energy 1999, 1, 1251–1256. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sodano, H.A.; Inman, D.J.; Park, G. A review of power harvesting from vibration using piezoelectric materials. Shock Vib. Dig 2004, 36, 197–205. [Google Scholar]
  12. Torres, E.O.; Rincsn-Mora, G.A. Energy-harvesting chips: The quest for everlasting life. Available online: http://www.powerdesignindia.co.in/STATIC/PDF/200807/PDIOL_2008JUL25_GREEN_TA_01.pdf?SOURCES=DOWNLOAD (accessed on 9 February 2011).
  13. Lee, D.S. Development of light powered sensor networks for thermal comfort measurement. Sensors 2008, 8, 6417–6432. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee, D.S. Energy harvesting chip and the chip based power supply development for a wireless sensor network. Sensors 2008, 8, 7690–7714. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, C.S.; Chang, L.C.; Lee, D.S. Wireless sensor network applied to thermal comfort of convenient stores customers and monitor the air-conditioning power. Proceedings of 5th Asian Conference on Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Proceedings of 5th ACRA, Tokyo, Japan, 7–9 June 2010.
  16. Tse, W.L.; Chan, W.L. Real-time measurement of thermal comfort. Measurement 2007, 40, 654–664. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolokotsa, D.; Saridakis, G.; Pouliezos, A.; Stavrakakis, G.S. Design and installation of an advanced EIB™ fuzzy indoor comfort controller using Matlab™. Energ. Buildings 2006, 38, 1084–1092. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, N.; Zhang, N.; Wang, M. Wireless sensors in agriculture and food industry-Recent development and future perspective. Comput. Electron. Agr 2006, 50, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamagata, Y.; Kumagai, T.; Sai, Y.; Uchida, Y.; Imai, K. A sensor powered by pulsed light. Proceedings of, International Conf. on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Digest of Technical Papers, TRANSDUCERS ’91, Tokyo, Japan, 24–27 June 1991; pp. 824–827.
  20. McLyman, C.W.T. Transformer and Inductor Design Handbook; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  21. National Semiconductor. LM135/LM235/LM335, LM135A/LM235A/LM335A Precision Temperature Sensors, Available online: http://www.jaycar.com.au/images_uploaded/LM135.pdf (accessed on 9 February 2011).
  22. Phidgets. 1127—Precision Light Sensor. Available online: http://www.phidgets.com/documentation/Phidgets/1127.pdf (accessed on 9 February 2011).
  23. Chang, L.C.; Deng, Y.W.; Lee, D.S.; Chen, C.S. Development of a high resolution CMOS flow sensor. Proceedings of 1st IEEE-NEMS Conference, Zhuhai, China, 18–21 January 2006; pp. 125–126.
  24. Burg, J.P. Maximum entropy spectral analysis. Presented at The 37th Annual International SEG Meeting, Oklahoma City, OH, USA, 1 November 1967.
  25. Fanger, P.O. Thermal Comfort; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  26. International Standards Organization. Moderate Thermal Environment Determinations of PMV and PPD Indices and Specifications for the Conditions of Thermal Comfort; ISO standard 7730; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  27. ASHRAE. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers; ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004; ASHRAE: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fergus, N. Survey of Thermal Comfort in Pakistan: Towards New Indoor Air Temperature Standards; Oxford Brookes University: Oxford, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kang, J.; Park, S. Integrated comfort sensing system on indoor climate. Sens. Actuat. A 2000, 82, 302–307. [Google Scholar]
  30. Airpak 3.0 User’s Guide; Fluent Inc.: Alex City, AL, USA, 2007.
  31. Bureau of Energy. The Convenient Stores’ Saving Energy Technology Manual; Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs: Taipei, Taiwan, 2001. [Google Scholar]

Appendix

Table S1. Governing equations with two-equation turbulence model.
Table S1. Governing equations with two-equation turbulence model.
EquationsφΓφSφ
Continuity100
Momentum EnergyV⇀μeff− ∇pρ0β(TT0)g⇀
hλeff Cp−10
Turbulence kinetic energyκμeff σκ−1Pk + Gbρɛ
Turbulence kinetic energyɛμeff σɛ−1(C1ɛPkC2ɛ2 + C3ɛGb)k−1
Dissipation rate

Equationsconstants
h = Cp (TTref)C1 = 1.44
Pk = μt (Uij + Uji)UijC2 = 1.92
Gb = βgiμt∂T(Prt∂xi)−1C3 = C1 tanh|νu−1|
μeff = μ + μtCμ = 0.09
σκ = 1.0
λeff = λ + λtσɛ = 1.3
Deff = D + DtPrt = 0.85
Dt = μt (ρSct)−1Sct = 0.7
Table S2. Values of ventilation and machines heat dissipation in convenience stores.
Figure 1. The schematic view of WSN to air conditioning in convenience stores: wireless sensor nodes, wireless sensor gateway, PMV control.
Figure 1. The schematic view of WSN to air conditioning in convenience stores: wireless sensor nodes, wireless sensor gateway, PMV control.
Sensors 11 02013f1 1024
Figure 2. (a) Structure of wireless sensor node [14]; (b) Sensor node distribution in a convenience store.
Figure 2. (a) Structure of wireless sensor node [14]; (b) Sensor node distribution in a convenience store.
Sensors 11 02013f2 1024
Figure 3. The photovoltaic cell with energy harvesting chip circuit provided a high slew rate current and steady current output.
Figure 3. The photovoltaic cell with energy harvesting chip circuit provided a high slew rate current and steady current output.
Sensors 11 02013f3 1024
Figure 4. The locations where the sensor nodes were installed: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 4. The locations where the sensor nodes were installed: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f4 1024
Figure 5. Temperature distribution schematic: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 5. Temperature distribution schematic: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f5 1024
Figure 6. Correlation between CFD and real measurements in: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 6. Correlation between CFD and real measurements in: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f6 1024
Figure 7. Indoor temperature distribution in convenience stores without a WSN at noon: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 7. Indoor temperature distribution in convenience stores without a WSN at noon: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f7 1024
Figure 8. Indoor temperature distribution in convenience stores without a WSN at night: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 8. Indoor temperature distribution in convenience stores without a WSN at night: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f8a 1024Sensors 11 02013f8b 1024
Figure 9. Room temperature distribution in convenience stores with WSN at noon: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 9. Room temperature distribution in convenience stores with WSN at noon: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f9 1024
Figure 10. Room temperature distribution in convenience stores with WSN at night: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 10. Room temperature distribution in convenience stores with WSN at night: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f10a 1024Sensors 11 02013f10b 1024
Figure 11. Comparison of average daily PMV in four convenience stores.
Figure 11. Comparison of average daily PMV in four convenience stores.
Sensors 11 02013f11 1024
Figure 12. The number of customers in the four convenience stores.
Figure 12. The number of customers in the four convenience stores.
Sensors 11 02013f12 1024
Figure 13. Increase in power conservation after applying a WSN in: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Figure 13. Increase in power conservation after applying a WSN in: (a) Store A; (b) Store B; (c) Store C; (d) Store D.
Sensors 11 02013f13 1024
Figure 14. The efficiency of energy conservation of air conditioning in a convenience store. 2007 was the baseline (with no WSN), with 2008 to 2010 figures indicating the percentage of energy conservation.
Figure 14. The efficiency of energy conservation of air conditioning in a convenience store. 2007 was the baseline (with no WSN), with 2008 to 2010 figures indicating the percentage of energy conservation.
Sensors 11 02013f14 1024
Figure 15. The schematic of the marginal energy conservation benefit of four convenience stores with a WSN.
Figure 15. The schematic of the marginal energy conservation benefit of four convenience stores with a WSN.
Sensors 11 02013f15 1024
Figure 16. The cost-recovery period after installing a WSN.
Figure 16. The cost-recovery period after installing a WSN.
Sensors 11 02013f16 1024
Table 1. Comparison of stray energy in the air.
Table 1. Comparison of stray energy in the air.
Type of stray energySourceRecovery mechanismEstimation the produced energy density (cm2)
Thermal sourcesAir conditioning cooling decreases temperature (summer), or heat pump generates heat (winter). Due to above condition, this caused temperature difference between indoors and outdoorsThermoelectric chip15 μW/10 °C
Vibration sourcesVibration due to human activities (walking, running, etc.) and machine toolsPiezoelectric
Electrostatic
Electromagnetic
200 μW
50–100 μW
1 μW
Light sourcesSolar radiation and indoor lightingPhotovoltaic cellsunlight
direct sunlight: 15 mw
oblique sunlight: 150 μw
indoor lighting (500–1,500 lux)
direct light: 5–15 mw
oblique light: 50–150 μw
Table 2. The power consumption of each sensor and wireless sensor node (powered by energy harvesting).
Table 2. The power consumption of each sensor and wireless sensor node (powered by energy harvesting).
ItemTypeMeasurement rangePower supply
Temperature sensorLM355−55 °C ∼ +150 °C300 μA at 3 V
Relative humidity sensorSHT1X20% ∼ 80%550 μA at 3 V
Photosensor with signal processing circuitsAccuracy level was ±2% of the reading range, which yielded 1.5 to 4.5 °C uncertainty.1 mA at 2.5 V
MEMS flow sensor developed by this lab0.1 ms−1 ∼ 0.45 ms−15 mA at 2.5 V
Signal processor and RF transmission modulePIC16F5260.5 ∼ 10 mA at 3.5 VNominal power: 20 mW
Standby power: 1.75 mW
Transient power max: 35 mW
Photovoltaic cellSC 7035
Table 3. Different thermal comfort levels represented by different PMV index levels.
Table 3. Different thermal comfort levels represented by different PMV index levels.
IndexBody sensation
+3hot
+2warm
+1slightly warm
0neutral
−1slightly cool
−2cool
−3cold
Table 4. Sensor component cost.
Table 4. Sensor component cost.
ItemTypeCost (USD)Cost of a set of sensors (USD)
Temperature sensorLM355318
Relative humidity sensorSHT1X6.521.5
Photosensor with signal processing circuits0.515.5
MEMS flow sensor developed by this lab3045

Total cost of installing the WSN (including 3 temperature sensors, 2 relative humidity sensors, 2 air flow sensors, 1 illumination sensor, and 1 gateway)500

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.-S.; Lee, D.-S. Energy Saving Effects of Wireless Sensor Networks: A Case Study of Convenience Stores in Taiwan. Sensors 2011, 11, 2013-2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110202013

AMA Style

Chen C-S, Lee D-S. Energy Saving Effects of Wireless Sensor Networks: A Case Study of Convenience Stores in Taiwan. Sensors. 2011; 11(2):2013-2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110202013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chih-Sheng, and Da-Sheng Lee. 2011. "Energy Saving Effects of Wireless Sensor Networks: A Case Study of Convenience Stores in Taiwan" Sensors 11, no. 2: 2013-2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110202013

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop