Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Horizontal Stresses in Soil during Direct Simple Shear by High-Resolution Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid IRBM-BPNN Approach for Error Parameter Estimation of SINS on Aircraft
Previous Article in Special Issue
An E-Nose for the Monitoring of Severe Liver Impairment: A Preliminary Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Barcoded Polymer-Based Cross-Reactive Spectroscopic Sensor Array for Organic Volatiles

by
Jessica E. Fitzgerald
1,
Jianliang Shen
2,3 and
Hicham Fenniri
1,4,5,*
1
Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
3
Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325000, China
4
Department of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
5
Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(17), 3683; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173683
Submission received: 19 July 2019 / Revised: 4 August 2019 / Accepted: 16 August 2019 / Published: 24 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomimetic Sensor Arrays)

Abstract

:
The development of cross-reactive sensor arrays for volatile organics (electronic noses, e-noses) is an active area of research. In this manuscript, we present a new format for barcoded polymer sensor arrays based on porous polymer beads. An array of nine self-encoded polymers was analyzed by Raman spectroscopy before and after exposure to a series of volatile organic compounds, and the changes in the vibrational fingerprints of their polymers was recorded before and after exposure. Our results show that the spectroscopic changes experienced by the porous spectroscopically encoded beads after exposure to an analyte can be used to identify and classify the target analytes. To expedite this analysis, analyte-specific changes induced in the sensor arrays were transformed into a response pattern using multivariate data analysis. These studies established the barcoded bead array format as a potentially effective sensing element in e-nose devices. Devices such as these have the potential to advance personalized medicine, providing a platform for non-invasive, real-time volatile metabolite detection.

1. Introduction

The design of artificial devices and systems using biomimetic engineering concepts emerged over three decades ago [1,2,3,4]. The scientific community recognized the power and versatility of natural sensing systems, such as the sense of smell, taste, touch, hearing, and vision, and began to mimic these natural functions, in particular for the design of so-called artificial/electronic noses (e-noses) [5,6]. Gardner and Bartlett defined an e-nose as a device composed of (a) an array of semi-selective sensing elements with a broad spectrum of specificities to a target analyte and (b) a pattern recognition system, capable of processing complex and often convoluted signal outputs and identifying unique pattern characteristic of a given analyte [5]. This technology platform was applied, for example, in the food industry [7,8,9], environmental monitoring [10], diagnostics [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], and public safety [23].
A hallmark of e-nose systems is cross-reactivity, i.e., no individual sensing element is selective toward an individual analyte. Instead, each sensing element could interact with several analytes with varying degrees of affinity, thereby resulting in a unique response pattern characteristic of the target analyte [6]. The resulting pattern of the cross-reactive sensor array (CRSA) can be used to not only classify but also quantify the analyte of concern [6,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].
E-nose devices can be classified on the basis of their signal-transduction mechanisms [29]. Among them, semiconducting metal oxides [32], conducting polymer films [24,33], acoustic wave devices [34,35,36,37], electrochemical systems [38,39,40], polymer film chemoresistors [22,25,41], and optical transducers [7,30,42,43,44,45,46] have been reported. Regardless of the transduction mechanism, the larger the number of sensory elements in a CRSA, the richer the data gathered, and the more specific the analyte identification and classification [47,48,49,50,51,52,53].
We have previously reported on a new class of polymers prepared from spectroscopically active styrene monomers, the combination of which produces polymers with unique vibrational fingerprints [49,51,54,55,56,57,58,59]. The spectrum from each polymer can then be converted into a barcode, in which the position of each bar matches a peak wavenumber in the spectrum. Each barcoded polymer (BP) can be identified with 100% confidence and classified using its unique vibrational spectra [58]. Recently, we have successfully demonstrated the ability of a BP thin film-based CRSA to identify analytes in the vapor phase [60] and in solution, including Hepatitis C coat protein p7 [61].
In this contribution, we have fabricated a CRSA using BP beads (BP-CRSAs) and tested the device for the detection and differentiation of clinically relevant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as a first step towards developing a new assay for disease diagnosis. BP-CRSAs were fabricated by depositing an assortment of beaded BPs in an ordered fashion onto a glass microscope slide or quartz microscope coverslip inside a custom-built gas chamber.

2. Materials and Methods

Materials. Polymer samples used in this paper were synthesized as previously described [55]. Nine polymers were selected from a library of ca. 700 to fabricate the BP-CRSAs. The polymers were made of a combination of seven monomers, as shown in Figure 1. Each polymer has a unique composition (supporting information) and vibrational fingerprint, which can be readily identified by Raman spectroscopy.
Acetone, cumene, carbon disulfide (CS2), pentane, and propylbenzene (Aldrich, analytical-grade reagents used without further purification) were selected as target volatile organic analytes to test the effectiveness of the BP-CRSAs as an e-nose. These VOCs are known to be clinically relevant for disease diagnosis via exhaled breath analysis. Though they may also be present in the exhaled breath of patients with other diseases, the VOCs selected have the strongest association with the diseases in Table 1. This study will further establish that the sensors provide sufficient information for analyte classification.
Polymer sensor array fabrication. Nine polymer bead types were selected from our library for the fabrication of each BP-CRSA. The beads were suspended in chloroform, and a small sample was spotted on quartz microscope coverslips (spot diameter ca. 1 mm, containing ca. 30 beads) contained within a custom-built gas chamber (Figure 2). Chloroform was chosen as an ideal solvent because of its low bowling point, weak Raman scattering, and because it promotes adhesion of the beads to the substrate while still allowing adequate exposure to analyte vapor. The beads did not show signs of wear or damage throughout the procedure.
Experimental setup. Prior to vapor exposure, the Raman spectra of each BP bead type were recorded in triplicate (control spectra). All experiments were performed at 20 °C and 50% relative humidity. Next, BP-CRSAs were placed in the head space of sealed glass bottles containing ca. 5 mL of VOC solution. After exposure to the analyte vapor for 5 min, the Raman spectra of the BP-CRSAs were recorded. For gas-chamber exposure (see illustration in Figure 2), the miniature gas chamber was sealed with a top window and inlet/outlet check valves, and then flushed with N2 gas for 90 s. Saturated analyte vapor collected from the head space of a solution of each analyte using a 30 mL gas syringe was then re-injected into the chamber through the inlet check valve. The vapor exposure method was designed to emulate the method used for administering breath samples in animal studies. The sensor arrays were scanned before and after analyte vapor exposure by Raman spectroscopy. After vapor exposure, the sensing device was allowed to equilibrate before spectrum or image acquisition. The equilibrium was verified by the absence of changes in the measured spectra, taken at two consecutive time points.
Raman mapping of the BP-CRSAs. The Raman spectra were obtained using a home-built inverted microscope at the Laser Biomedical Research Center (LBRC) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (see supporting information for details).
Data processing. The preprocessing of the vibrational spectra involved baseline correction and normalization. The spectral matrices before and after exposure were then compared by computing their dot products. This procedure was performed for each spectrum before and after VOC exposure (see supporting information for more details). An angle map was then generated, where θ is defined as the angle between the reference (unexposed) and response (exposed) vectors for each BP sensor [64,65,66] (see supporting information for details):
cos θ = | y i y i | | y i | | y i | .

3. Results and Discussion

In this work, the fabrication and performance of a new sensor array for an e-nose device are presented. The fabrication techniques herein afford the fast, facile, cost-effective, and highly tunable production of microsensor arrays for the application of interest, compared to many published techniques for similar sensing arrays. The use of multivariate data analysis increases the sample’s throughput and processing time. Pattern recognition can then be used to identify the samples for which the vapor components and concentrations are unknown by referencing the library of known sensor responses for each unique BP. Batch to batch reproducibility and the sensitivity of CRSAs are cornerstones of e-nose technology. The ability of a sensor array to faithfully recognize an analyte is essential for any application. Sensitivity here is defined as the degree of response (θ) for each BP, relative to the analyte concentration. This was evaluated for CS2 and was chosen because of its strong and consistent spectral response fingerprint for all BPs. The results are presented below.
Microarray fabrication and testing. From an initial library of ca. 700 BPs, each with a unique vibrational barcode [57], nine BPs (formulations 14 through 22) were selected for the fabrication of each BP-CRSA. The monomers used to synthesize the BPs are presented in Figure 1. Inspection of the arrays by optical microscopy confirmed that, after sensor fabrication, the beads did not show signs of wear or damage. Using the bead deposition procedure described in the experimental section, it was possible to fabricate arrays containing either one type of bead for a single polymer response analysis, or a selection of BPs, for a global sensor response analysis.
Raman spectroscopy of each microspot containing beads from a single class of BPs enables accurate and quick identification of each BP class in the microsensor array. The BP beads placed in each microarray can be distinguished from one another through their unique Raman spectra. The identification and testing of the polymer bead arrays were performed using a Raman microscope equipped with a homemade miniaturized gas chamber (Figure 2). This device allows for the addition of a VOC via a syringe through an inlet check valve. The miniaturized gas chamber itself provides excellent resistance to aggressive organic solvents and allows the preparation of BP bead arrays for Raman analysis. Because of its excellent durability with respect to the solvent, the support can be deconstructed and then resealed with a fresh array of sensors and reused many times without cross-contamination.
Multivariate data analysis and sensor arrays response. All of the analytes produced unique changes in the initial Raman spectra of the BPs in the BP-CRSA (supporting information). These changes likely arise from multiple interactions due to physisorption and/or chemisorption of the analyte on the polymer matrices. The θ heat map for each analyte (Figure 3) clearly shows a unique and reproducible [67] pattern response that can be used for their rapid identification. To validate the consistency of the control spectra for each BP between scans, the θ values between all three control runs (before exposure) were calculated.
Reproducibility. As in biological systems, an e-nose is a device that can be trained to recognize an ever-increasing set of analytes as long as each analyte results in a unique response pattern. As this database expands, the ability of a CRSA to identify, classify, and possibly quantify an analyte becomes not only possible but also much more accurate. Furthermore, natural and artificial sensors have a finite lifetime. For example, olfactory receptor cells are constantly regenerated and are believed to have a lifespan of 4–8 weeks [68], yet, once a natural system is exposed to an “odor” for the first time, it will always recognize that odor. In the present study, the high degree of sensor reproducibility coupled with the simple fabrication and low cost of the sensor arrays makes the periodic replacement of the entire array simple and cost-effective and would not require retraining the arrays.
Sensitivity of the BP-CRSAs. To evaluate the detection limit of the BP-CRSAs, various concentrations of CS2 in water were prepared, and the solvent vapor headspace was then injected into the gas chamber. Given that a saturated aqueous solution of CS2 contains 2.17 g/L at 20 °C, we prepared two concentrations at 100% and 10% saturation (2.17 g/L and 0.217 g/L, respectively), recorded the spectra, and calculated the BP-CRSA responses. Compared with pure CS2 headspace vapor, responses for the dilute CS2 solutions were reduced, as shown in Figure 4.

4. Conclusions

Cross-reactive polymer microbead arrays were fabricated. Using Raman spectroscopy, the arrays can be readily scanned, and the identity of each polymers can be determined by correlating the chemometric image with the known spectra of the polymers used. Arrays of these BPs were shown to be effective sensors for biologically relevant analytes. However, analyte concentrations in exhaled breath are several times lower than the concentrations tested (parts per million to parts per billion). Thus, further testing and optimization are needed to boost the sensor sensitivity and reproducibility for clinical applications using exhaled human breath. To realize this aim, we plan to modify our BP sensor beads by incorporating surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technology, such as that used by our group for the improved detection of serotonin using optically stable gold-polyethylene glycol-polystyrene nanocomposites [69] or our silver nanoparticle-polystyrene bead composites [52]. SERS has been shown to increase sensitivity by several orders of magnitude [70]. SERS, then, can significantly increase the potential of the BP arrays for implementation in clinical applications, including disease detection and diagnosis in exhaled breath.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/17/3683/s1, Figure S1: Raman spectra of BPs before and after exposure to analytes, Table S1: BP composition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.F.; methodology, H.F., J.E.F; validation, H.F., J.E.F.; formal analysis, H.F., J.E.F.; resources, H.F., J.S.; data curation, J.E.F.; writing—original draft preparation, H.F., J.E.F., J.S.; writing—review and editing, H.F., J.E.F., and J.S.; supervision, H.F.; project administration, H.F.; funding acquisition, H.F.

Funding

This research was funded in part by Northeastern University and Canada’s National Institute for Nanotechnology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dickinson, T.A.; White, J.; Kauer, J.S.; Walt, D.R. A chemical-detecting system based on a cross-reactive optical sensor array. Nature 1996, 382, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sohn, Y.-S.; Goodey, A.; Anslyn, E.V.; McDevitt, J.T.; Shear, J.B.; Neikirk, D.P. A microbead array chemical sensor using capillary-based sample introduction: toward the development of an electronic tongue. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lavigne, J.J.; Savoy, S.; Clevenger, M.B.; Ritchie, J.E.; McDoniel, B.; Yoo, S.-J.; Anslyn, E.V.; McDevitt, J.T.; Shear, J.B. Solution-based analysis of multiple analytes by a sensor array: Toward the development of an electronic tongue. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lundström, I.; Erlandsson, R.; Frykman, U.; Hedborg, E.; Spetz, A.; Sundgren, H.; Welin, S.; Winquist, F. Artificial’olfactory’images from a chemical sensor using a light-pulse technique. Nature 1991, 352, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gardner, J.W.; Bartlett, P.N. A brief history of electronic noses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1994, 18, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Walt, D.R.; Stitzel, S.E.; Aernecke, M.J. Artificial noses. Am. Sci. 2012, 100, 38. [Google Scholar]
  7. Di Natale, C.; Paolesse, R.; Macagnano, A.; Mantini, A.; D’Amico, A.; Legin, A.; Lvova, L.; Rudnitskaya, A.; Vlasov, Y. Human skin odor analysis by means of an electronic nose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 64, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, C.; Suslick, K.S.J. Colormetric sensor array for soft drink analysis. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jonsson, A.; Winquist, F.; Schnürer, J.; Sundgren, H.; Lundström, I. Electronic nose for microbial quality classification of grains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1997, 35, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Vito, S.; Massera, E.; Piga, M.; Martinotto, L.; Di Francia, G. On field calibration of an electronic nose for benzene estimation in an urban pollution monitoring scenario. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 129, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. D’Amico, A.; Pennazza, G.; Santonico, M.; Martinelli, E.; Roscioni, C.; Galluccio, G.; Paolesse, R.; Di Natale, C. An investigation on electronic nose diagnosis of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2010, 68, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Phillips, M.; Gleeson, K.; Hughes, J.M.B.; Greenberg, J.; Cataneo, R.N.; Baker, L.; McVay, W.P. Volatile organic compounds in breath as markers of lung cancer: A cross-sectional study. Lancet 1999, 353, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shirasu, M.; Touhara, K. The scent of disease: Volatile organic compounds of the human body related to disease and disorder. J. Biochem. 2011, 150, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chan, H.P.; Lewis, C.; Thomas, P.S. Exhaled breath analysis: Novel approach for early dectection of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2009, 63, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Turner, A.P.; Magan, N. Electronic noses and disease diagnostics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Miekisch, W.; Schubert, J.K.; Noeldge-Schomburg, G.F.E. Diagnostic potential of breath analysis—Focus on volatile organic compounds. Clin. Chim. Acta 2004, 347, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Phillips, M.; Erickson, G.A.; Sabas, M.; Smith, J.P.; Greenberg, J. Volatile organic compounds in the breath of patients with schizophrenia. J. Clin. Pathol. 1995, 48, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mazzatenta, A.; Di Giulio, C.; Pokorski, M. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) fingerprint of Alzheimer’s disease. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2013, 187, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tisch, U.; Nassar, M.; Axelrod, N.; Azar, F.; Marmur, A.; Aharon-peretz, J.; Haick, H. Detection of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease from exhaled breath using nanomaterial-based sensors. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dragonieri, S.; Schot, R.; Mertens, B.J.A.; Le Cessie, S.; Gauw, S.A.; Spanevello, A.; Resta, O.; Willard, N.P.; Vink, T.J.; Rabe, K.F. An electronic nose in the discrimination of patients with asthma and controls. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, C.; Ke, C.; Wang, X.; Chi, C.; Guo, L.; Luo, S.; Guo, Z.; Xu, G.; Zhang, F.; Li, E. Noninvasive detection of colorectal cancer by analysis of exhaled breath. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 4757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ionescu, R.; Broza, Y.; Shaltieli, H.; Sadeh, D.; Zilberman, Y.; Feng, X.; Glass-Marmor, L.; Lejbkowicz, I.; Müllen, K.; Miller, A.; et al. Detection of multiple sclerosis from exhaled breath using bilayers of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and single-wall carbon nanotubes. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2011, 2, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gardner, J.W.; Yinon, J. Electronic Noses & Sensors for the Detection of Explosives; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  24. Freund, M.S.; Lewis, N.S. A chemically diverse conducting polymer-based “electronic nose”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sisk, B.C.; Lewis, N.S. Vapor sensing using polymer/carbon black composites in the percolative conduction regime. Langmuir 2006, 22, 7928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gardner, J.W.; Shin, H.W.; Hines, E.L. An electronic nose system to diagnose illness. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 70, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thorn, R.M.S.; Greenman, J.J. Microbial volatile compounds in health and disease conditions. Breath Res. 2012, 6, 024001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aernecke, M.J.; Walt, D.R. Optical-fiber arrays for vapor sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 142, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Askim, J.R.; Mahmoudi, M.; Suslick, K.S. Optical sensor arrays for chemical sensing: The optoelectronic nose. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Johnson, S.R.; Sutter, J.M.; Engelhardt, H.L.; Jurs, P.C.; White, J.; Kauer, J.S.; Dickinson, T.A.; Walt, D.R. Identification of multiple analytes using an optical sensor array and pattern recognition neural networks. Differences 1997, 69, 4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Glatz, R.; Bailey-Hill, K. Mimicking nature’s noses: From receptor deorphaning to olfactory biosensing. Prog. Neurobiol. 2011, 93, 270. [Google Scholar]
  32. Meixner, H.; Lampe, U. Metal oxide sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1996, 33, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, C.; Dai, L.; Roy, A.; Tolle, T.B. Multifunctional chemical vapro sensors of aligned carbon nanotube and polymer composites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shiokawa, S.; Kondoh, J. Surface acoustic wave sensors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gabl, R.; Feucht, H.D.; Zeininger, H.; Eckstein, G.; Schreiter, M.; Primig, R.; Pitzer, D.; Wersing, W. First results on label-free detection of DNA and protein molecules using a novel integrated sensor technology based on gravimetric detection principles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 19, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chang, S.M.; Ebert, B.; Tamiya, E.; Karube, I. Development of chemical vapour sensor using SAW resonator oscillator incorporating odorant receptive LB films. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1991, 6, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wingqvist, G.; Yantchev, V.; Katardjiev, I. Mass sensitivity of multilayer thin film resonant BAW sensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2008, 148, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tian, S.-Y.; Deng, S.-P.; Chen, Z.-X. Multifrequency large amplitude pulse voltammetry: A novel electrochemical method for electronic tongue. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 123, 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gallardo, J.; Alegert, S.; Del Valle, M. A flow-injection electronic tongue based on potentiometric sensors for the determination of nitrate in the presence of chloride. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 101, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Winquist, F.; Wide, P.; Lundström, I. An electronic tongue based on voltammetry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 357, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shevade, A.V.; Ryan, M.A.; Homer, M.L.; Manfreda, A.M.; Zhou, H.; Manatt, K. Molecular modeling of polymer composite-analyte interactions in electronic nose sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2003, 93, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. White, J.; Kauer, J.S.; Dickinson, T.A.; Walt, D.R. Rapid analyte recognition in a device based on optical sensors and the olfactory system. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gorris, H.H.; Blicharz, T.M.; Walt, D.R. Optical-fiber bundles. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 5462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Epstein, J.R.; Walt, D.R. Fluorescence-based fibre optic arrays: A universal platform for sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rakow, N.A.; Suslick, K.S. A colorimetric sensor array for odour visualization. Nature 2000, 406, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rakow, N.A.; Sen, A.; Janzen, M.C.; Ponder, J.B.; Suslick, K.S. Molecular recognition and discrimination of amies with a colorimetric array. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dickinson, T.A.; Walt, D.R.; White, J.; Kauer, J.S. Generating sensor diversity through combinatorial polymer synthesis. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Albert, K.J.; Lewis, N.S.; Schauer, C.L.; Sotzing, G.A.; Stitzel, S.E.; Vaid, T.P.; Walt, D.R. Optical multibead arrays for simple and complex odor discrimination. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chun, S.; Xu, J.; Cheng, J.; Ding, L.; Winograd, N.; Fenniri, H.J. Spectroscopically encoded resins for high throughput imaging time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Comb. Chem. 2006, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Blais, D.R.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Bravo-Vasquez, J.P.; Fenniri, H.; Pezacki, J.P. Multiplex pathogen detection based on spatially addressable microarrays of barcoded resins. Biotechnol. J. 2008, 3, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fenniri, H.; Terreau, O.; Chun, S.; Oh, S.J.; Finney, W.F.; Morris, M.D. Classification of spectroscopically encoded resins by Raman mapping and infrared hyperspectral imaging. J. Comb. Chem. 2006, 8, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Oh, E.H.; Song, H.S.; Park, T.H. Recent advances in electronic and bioelectronic noses and their biomedical applications. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2011, 48, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Farah, A.A.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Fenniri, H. Chemically stable silver nanoparticle-crosslinked polymer microspheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 319, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bravo-Vasquez, J.P.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Fenniri, H. Self-encoded polymer beads for microarray technologies. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 125, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fenniri, H.; Ding, L.; Ribbe, A.E.; Zyrianov, Y. Barcoded resins: A new concept for polymer-supported combinatoria library self-deconvolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fenniri, H.; Chun, S.; Ding, L.; Zyrianov, Y.; Hallenga, K. Preparation, physical properties, on-bead binding assay and spectroscopic reliability of 25 barcoded polystyrene—poly(ethylene glycol) graft copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fenniri, H.; Chun, S.; Terreau, O.; Bravo-Vasquez, J.P. Preparation and Infrared/Raman Classification of 630 Specroscopically Encoded Styrene Copolymers. J. Comb. Chem. 2008, 10, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fenniri, H.; Hedderich, H.G.; Haber, K.S.; Achkar, J.; Taylor, B. Towards the Dual Recursive Deconvolution (DRED) of Resin-Supported Combinatorial Libraries: A Non-invasive Methodology Based on Bead Self-Encoding and Multispectral Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4483–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Raez, J.; Biais, D.R.; Zhang, Y.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Bravo-Vasquez, J.P.; Pezacki, J.P.; Fenniri, H. Spectroscopically encoded microspheres for antigen biosensing. Langmuir 2007, 23, 6482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fitzgerald, J.E.; Fadaee, S.S.; Sundaram, R.; Fenniri, H. Sensor arrays from spectroscopically-encoded polymers: towards an affordable diagnostic device for biomolecules. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 288, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fitzgerald, J.E.; Bui, E.T.H.; Simon, N.M.; Fenniri, H. Artificial nose technology: status and prospects in diagnostics. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 35, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Righettoni, M.; Tricoli, A.; Pratsinis, S.E. Si:WO3 sensors for highly selective detection of acetone for easy diagnosis of diabetes by breath analysis. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hasweii, S.J. Practical Guide to Chemometrics; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  64. Adams, M.J. Chemometrics in Analytical Spectroscopy; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  65. Esbensen, K.H. Multivariate Data Analysis-In Practice, 5th ed.; Camo Technologies: Woodbridge, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yanai, T.; Tew, D.P.; Handy, N.C. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tawada, Y.; Tsuneda, T.; Yanagisawa, S.; Yanai, T.; Hirao, K. A long-range-corrected time-dependent density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 8425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bravo-Vasquez, J.P.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Cho, J.Y.; Fenniri, H. Robust Au-PEG/PS microbeads as optically stable platforms for SERS. Small 2009, 5, 1283. [Google Scholar]
  70. Bravo-Vasquez, J.P.; Fenniri, H. Single-molecule SERRS detection platforms obtained via galvanic displacement on silver fractals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 12897–12900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of the seven different monomers used for the preparation of the barcoded copolymer beads.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of the seven different monomers used for the preparation of the barcoded copolymer beads.
Sensors 19 03683 g001
Figure 2. Vapor exposure setup using a custom-built gas chamber, micromachined from Teflon.
Figure 2. Vapor exposure setup using a custom-built gas chamber, micromachined from Teflon.
Sensors 19 03683 g002
Figure 3. A theta heat map of polymer/analyte interactions compared to the control (Ctr). Analytes studied: acetone (Ace), cumene (Cme), propylbenzene (PrB), pentane (Pnt), and carbon disulfide (CS2).
Figure 3. A theta heat map of polymer/analyte interactions compared to the control (Ctr). Analytes studied: acetone (Ace), cumene (Cme), propylbenzene (PrB), pentane (Pnt), and carbon disulfide (CS2).
Sensors 19 03683 g003
Figure 4. Stepwise increase of theta values upon increasing the concentration of CS2 for six of the barcoded polymers (BPs).
Figure 4. Stepwise increase of theta values upon increasing the concentration of CS2 for six of the barcoded polymers (BPs).
Sensors 19 03683 g004
Table 1. List of diseases and their associated volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Table 1. List of diseases and their associated volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
DiseasesAssociated VOCs
Alzheimer’s diseasePropyl-benzene, 1-Methylethyl-benzene (Cumene) [19]
SchizophreniaPentane, Carbon Disulfide [62]
DiabetesAcetone [63]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fitzgerald, J.E.; Shen, J.; Fenniri, H. A Barcoded Polymer-Based Cross-Reactive Spectroscopic Sensor Array for Organic Volatiles. Sensors 2019, 19, 3683. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173683

AMA Style

Fitzgerald JE, Shen J, Fenniri H. A Barcoded Polymer-Based Cross-Reactive Spectroscopic Sensor Array for Organic Volatiles. Sensors. 2019; 19(17):3683. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173683

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fitzgerald, Jessica E., Jianliang Shen, and Hicham Fenniri. 2019. "A Barcoded Polymer-Based Cross-Reactive Spectroscopic Sensor Array for Organic Volatiles" Sensors 19, no. 17: 3683. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173683

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop