Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Fiber Bragg Gratings Inscribed in Thin Films Deposited on D-Shaped Optical Fibers
Next Article in Special Issue
Fast Sensing of Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) Vapors Using a Hand-Held Ion Mobility Spectrometer with Nonradioactive Ionization Source
Previous Article in Journal
HyAdamC: A New Adam-Based Hybrid Optimization Algorithm for Convolution Neural Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Simulation Framework for the Integration of Artificial Olfaction into Multi-Sensor Mobile Robots
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Ratiometric Optical Dual Sensor for the Simultaneous Detection of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide

by
Divyanshu Kumar
1 and
Cheng-Shane Chu
1,2,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, Taishan Dist., New Taipei City 243303, Taiwan
2
Research Center for Intelligent Medical Device, Ming Chi University of Technology, Taishan Dist., New Taipei City 243303, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(12), 4057; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124057
Submission received: 10 May 2021 / Revised: 5 June 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 12 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Gas Sensors for Environment Monitoring)

Abstract

:
Simultaneous detection of carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) has attracted considerable interest since CO2 and O2 play key roles in various industrial and domestic applications. In this study, a new approach based on a fluorescence ratiometric referencing method was reported to develop an optical dual sensor where platinum (II) meso-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin (PtTFPP) complex used as the O2-sensitive dye, CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) combined with phenol red used as the CO2-sensitive dye, and CdSe/ZnS QDs used as the reference dye for the simultaneous detection of O2 and CO2. All the dyes were immobilized in a gas-permeable matrix poly (isobutyl methacrylate) (PolyIBM) and subjected to excitation using a 380 nm LED. The as-obtained distinct fluorescence spectral intensities were alternately exposed to analyte gases to observe changes in the fluorescence intensity. In the presence of O2, the fluorescence intensity of the Pt (II) complex was considerably quenched, while in the presence of CO2, the fluorescence intensity of QDs was increased. The corresponding ratiometric sensitivities of the optical dual sensor for O2 and CO2 were approximately 13 and 144, respectively. In addition, the response and recovery for O2 and CO2 were calculated to be 10 s/35 s and 20 s/60 s, respectively. Thus, a ratiometric optical dual gas sensor for the simultaneous detection of O2 and CO2 was successfully developed. Effects of spurious fluctuations in the intensity of external and excitation sources were suppressed by the ratiometric sensing approach.

1. Introduction

The simultaneous occurrence of carbon dioxide and oxygen is quite common. Processes like photosynthesis, fermentation, respiration, etc. involve the evolution and consumption of both gases at the same time. In many such reactions related to biological research, medical analysis, and biogeochemical processes the simultaneous measurement of both of the gases are desirable and required to quantitatively control their concentrations [1,2,3].
In recent years, optical methods based on absorptiometry, reflectometry, infrared, fluorescence, and surface plasmon resonance have been frequently used for the development of single-analyte gas sensors [4]. Among these methods, the fluorescence-based optical method is typically used because of its high sensitivity and selectivity [5]. Several individual O2 and CO2 optical sensors based on this method have been reported [6]. Moreover, this method demonstrates the capability to develop multi-analyte sensors [7,8]. Here, the sensors are designed in such a manner that the fluorophores sensitive to the respective gases exhibit fluorescence signals at different wavelengths and are only responsive towards that particular gas. In addition, a suitable gas-permeable matrix is used to host the fluorophores that facilitate the penetration of gases. Several studies have already been published describing the development of dual O2–CO2 sensors based on the fluorescence lifetime or fluorescence intensity measurement methods [9,10,11,12,13]. Most of the previously developed O2–CO2 dual sensors use either a single- or double-layer approach to design the sensor system. In a single-layer designed sensor, both the O2- and CO2-sensitive fluorophores are incorporated in a common matrix and coated as one layer, whereas in double-layer sensors, the fluorophores are incorporated in different matrices and coated in separate layers one above the other. Nevertheless, the single layer design is simpler and more straightforward with rapid response due to a shorter diffusion distance [14]. Although multiple O2–CO2-based dual sensors with good sensitivity and response time have recently been developed, the practical use of such devices requires more precise and better sensor characteristics. Most of the currently available dual sensors exhibit mutual interference and poor selectivity [14]. The response–recovery times and sensitivities are good, but considerably better times and sensitivities are required. In addition, an intensity-based sensor is limited by several interferences due to temperature change, non-uniform distribution of indicator concentrations, intensity fluctuations, equipment-based errors, etc. Therefore, an effective dual O2–CO2 sensor with an appropriate simpler design and better performance is still not available.
Most of these errors can be eliminated using an appropriate referencing method, which have not been proposed thus far. One such method is fluorescence-based ratiometric referencing method, which is used herein [15,16]. In this method, an additional reference signal exhibited by another fluorophore is available in the designed sensor. The sensitivities of such a sensor are calculated as the ratio of the fluorescence intensity of the indicator dye to that of the reference dye at the respective analyte concentrations. Oxygen is paramagnetic and is a well-known collision quencher. In principle, O2 detection is based on the fluorescence quenching of the sensitive dyes by oxygen. A number of oxygen-sensitive dyes for oxygen detection are available [17]. Compared with the other dyes, metalloporphyrins, such as Pt and Pd complexes, are highly sensitive and selective for O2 [18,19,20,21]. Specifically, the dye platinum (II) meso-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) porphyrin (PtTFPP) exhibits outstanding optical properties, including a large Stokes shift, excellent photostability, narrow emission bandwidth, and a higher quantum yield, making it highly suitable for the development of a more efficient oxygen sensor. Such indicators are doped into a suitable gas-permeable matrix, such as a polymer or sol–gel matrix, for enhancing molecular contact to achieve higher sensitivities. Therefore, in this study, PtTFPP doped into a polymer matrix poly(isobutyl methacrylate) (PolyIBM) was used as an O2-sensitive dye.
On the other hand, gaseous CO2 is measured by infrared absorptiometry, as well as electrochemically using the Severinghaus electrode, and pH indicators [6,22]. CO2 measured by using pH indicators exhibits several advantages over the others including higher sensitivity and better linearity with quick response and recovery times. pH indicators are weak acids or bases that undergo a reversible change in their optical properties (absorbance or fluorescence) due to their deprotonation and protonation. Recently developed optical CO2 sensors exploit a colorimetric change in pH indicator dyes, such as thymol blue, phenol red, and α-naphtholphthalein, or a fluorescence change in luminescent dyes such as 1-hydroxypyrene trisulfonate (HPTS) and fluorescein derivatives to detect CO2 [23,24,25,26]. However, colorimetric-based pH indicators exhibit less sensitivity, and fluorescent pH indicators are very limited. Very recently, few studies have reported where the combination of a colorimetric pH indicator and a luminescent dye as an internal reference dye is utilized to develop CO2 sensors with higher sensitivities [27]. Here, the luminescence band of the internal reference dye overlaps with the absorption band of the pH indicator, which is altered by the absence and presence of CO2. Thus, in the presence of CO2, because of resonance energy transfer (FRET), the fluorescence intensity of the internal reference dye changes, indicating the presence of CO2. One such sensor has been used to develop a CO2 sensor, which combines the use of α-naphtholphthalein and tetraphenyl porphyrin (TPP) as the pH indicator and internal reference dye, respectively [28]. Furthermore, polymer matrixes such as PVC, PVA and sol–gels have been used to provide an appropriate microenvironment for the fluorescent molecules. It stabilizes the acid or base form enhancing the gas diffusivity and surface contact between the molecules, leading to a more rapid response and recovery towards CO2. In this study, the combination of Phenol red (pH indicator) and CdSe/ZnS (A570) QDs (internal reference dye) was used as a CO2-sensitive system. The excellent photophysical properties of CdSe/ZnS (A570) QDs and the large extent overlap of its emission band with the absorption band of phenol red made it suitable to use as an internal reference dye.
Table 1 shows the material used for optical O2/CO2 dual sensors and compares the performances of current sensors with that of different sensor types fabricated using various O2/CO2-sensitive dyes. On the other hand, a number of researches have presented the fluorescence intensity and lifetime based on single/dual layer methods. In this study, we describe an optical dual sensor based on the fluorescence ratiometric referencing technique using a single-layer approach. This work utilizes the PtTFPP complex for O2 sensing, the combination of CdSe/ZnS (A570) QDs and phenol red with tetraoctylammonium hydroxide (phase-transfer reagent) for CO2 sensing, and CdSe/ZnS (A460) QDs for ratiometric measurements. All of the fluorophores were incorporated in a polymer matrix Poly(IBM) and coated on a plastic membrane. The developed dual sensor in this study can be utilized in environmental air quality monitoring, gas measurements in biological processes in tissues.

2. Experiments

2.1. Materials

PtTFPP was purchased from Frontier Scientific (Logan, UT, USA). CdSe/ZnS (A560), and CdSe/ZnS (A460) were purchased from Taiwan Nanocrystals Inc. (Tainan City, Taiwan). Phenol red and Poly(IBM) were obtained from Alfa Aesar and Scientific Polymer Inc., respectively. Tetraoctylammonium hydroxide (TOAOH) was purchased from Aldrich and synthesized following a reference. In addition, toluene was purchased from Tedia Company Inc.
Figure 1a,b shows the TEM image of the CdSe/ZnS QDs and their corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis results, respectively. The CdSe/ZnS QDs mainly comprise Cd, Se, Zn, and S, where the x and y axes represent the energy (keV) and counts per second per electron (basically X-ray intensity), respectively.

2.2. Preparation of O2- and CO2-Sensing Materials

Initially, 200 mg of Poly (IBM) was mixed in 2 mL of toluene and stirred for 10 min at room temperature. After it dissolved completely, 30 mg of the CdSe/ZnS (A570) QDs was added to the solution and subjected to ultrasonication for 10 min at room temperature. An additional 20 mg of CdSe/ZnS (A460) was added, followed by ultrasonication for 10 min to obtain a clear solution. Subsequently, 0.5 mg of the PtTFPP complex and 1.5 mg of Phenol red is mixed in the solution and stirred. Finally, 100 µL of TOAOH is added and thoroughly stirred to obtain the final mixture. Sixty microliters of the final mixture were drop-coated on a plastic transparent membrane and dried in an ambient atmosphere for 15–20 min. The plastic membrane used here is composed of Polypropylene which is more resistive to the chemicals and organic solvents. The as-obtained sample as placed diagonally in a rectangular sample holder, which was connected to an LED light source from one side and a spectrometer detector on the adjacent side.

2.3. Instrumentation

Figure 2 shows the experimental set-up used for the performance characterization of the ratiometric optical dual sensor. A 380-nm central-wavelength LED light source driven by an arbitrary wave function generator (TGA1240, Thurlby Thandar Instruments (TTi) Ltd., Huntington, UK) at a frequency of 10 kHz was utilized for fluorophore excitation. The relative fluorescence intensities were measured using a USB 4000 spectrometer (U.S. Ocean Optics Inc., Largo, FL, USA). The gas flow was controlled using mass-flow controllers (Aalborg Instruments and Controls Inc., Orangeburg, NY, USA, Model GFC 17) and was mixed in a gas-mixing chamber. Absorption spectra of the fluorophores were recorded on a UV-Vis spectrophotometer.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Optical Properties of Dual Sensor

Figure 3a,b respectively shows emission and absorption spectra of the different fluorophores (viz. PtTFPP, CdSe/ZnS (A570), (A460), and phenol red). Absorption spectra and emission spectra of each material were individually recorded using a thin film. The obtained absorption spectrum reveals that all of the fluorophores can be excited easily by an LED with a central wavelength of 380 nm. Clear and distinct emissions attributed to the O2 indicator PtTFPP, CO2 indicator CdSe/ZnS QDs (A570), and reference fluorescent material CdSe/ZnS QDs (A460) are observed, with corresponding central peak wavelengths at 650, 570, and 460 nm, respectively, using an LED light source with 380 nm for excitation (Figure 3b). In addition, the figure reveals that the absorption spectrum of Phenol red considerably overlaps the emission spectrum of CdSe/ZnS (A570) QDs, a condition ideal for FRET. Therefore, this combination can be effectively used for CO2 detection. Thus, the individual detection of gases is performed via the monitoring of well-resolved emissions of sensing materials.

3.2. O2 Sensing Properties of the Optical Dual Sensor

Figure 4 shows the fluorescence intensity response of the dual sensor in the presence of different O2 concentrations. As expected, the fluorescence intensity of PtTFPP at 650 nm is selectively quenched considerably. With the increase in applied O2 concentration up to 100%, the quenching of the fluorescence intensity increases continuously, confirming that intensity quenching is proportional to the applied concentration. At higher O2 concentrations, the presence of increased number of oxygen molecules causes a larger number of molecular collisions and hence an increased extent of quenching. Moreover, the maximum intensity quenching is observed at low O2 concentrations, indicating that the sensor exhibits higher sensitivity at low O2 concentrations. Notably, intensities of the other fluorescence signals are unaffected or exhibit a negligible effect in the presence of O2, facilitating the detection of CO2 without any interferences. The response of the ratiometric sensor can be evaluated by R0 and R in the Stern–Volmer equation [33]:
R 0 / R = [ f / ( 1 + K S V [ O 2 ] ) + ( 1 f ) ] 1
where R0 and R represent the luminescence signal ratio of the sensor in the absence and presence of oxygen, respectively. F represents the fractional contribution to the total emissions, and KSV is the Stern–Volmer quenching constant. Figure 4b shows the plot between the ratiometric sensitivity (R0/R) and O2 concentration. With the increase in the O2 concentration, the ratiometric sensitivity of O2 increases and attains the maximum value of 13 at 100% O2. The downward curvature of the sensitivity plot can be explained by the modified Stern–Volmer equation shown in Equation (1). Moreover, the sensitivity plot is steeper at lower O2 concentrations (up to ~20%), indicative of the highly sensitive nature of the sensor at lower concentrations.

3.3. CO2 Sensing Properties of the Optical Dual Sensor

Similarly, Figure 5 shows the changes in the fluorescence signals upon exposure of the optical dual sensor to different CO2 concentrations. As expected, with the increase in the CO2 concentration from 0% to 100%, the fluorescence intensity of CdSe/ZnS (A570) QDs at 570 nm considerably increases. The intensity change is proportional to the applied concentration according to the Stern–Volmer equation. In principle, with the increase in the CO2 concentration, the absorption of phenol red at 570 nm decreases; hence, the observed fluorescence intensity of QDs increases. The relationship between the observed emission intensity of the CO2-sensing material and CO2 concentration follows Equation (2) [34]:
R / R 0 = 10 { C ( 1 / ( K + [ C O 2 ] ) 1 / K ) }
where C is a constant and K is the equilibrium constant. With the increase in the concentration, the CO2 sensitivity increases, exhibiting the maximum value at 100% of CO2. The calibration plot in Figure 5b reveals the relationship between ratiometric sensitivity (R0/R) and the different CO2 concentrations by Equation (2). The ratiometric sensitivity of the optical dual sensor for CO2 is estimated to be 144.

3.4. Response Time of the Optical Dual Sensor

For practical applications, sensors should exhibit a rapid response and recovery. Herein, the response and recovery of the fluorescence signals for the respective gases are individually calculated. The response and recovery represent the time taken by the optical sensor to achieve 90% of its final intensity and 90% of its initial intensity, respectively. For O2 response and recovery, the optical dual sensor is initially placed under 100% N2 and then switched to 100% O2 for 30 s, followed by switching again to 100% N2 for 60 s; this process is repeated for five cycles. Figure 6a shows the obtained plot. Figure 6a shows the response and recovery characteristics of the optical dual sensor for around 650 s in the presence and absence of O2. The PtTFPP complex completely recovers its fluorescence intensity after complete quenching at 100% O2. The response time taken for O2 to quench 90% of the intensity of PtTFPP complex is 10 s, while that taken to recover 90% of the quenched intensity is 35 s. Similarly, the response and recovery of the optical dual sensor for CO2 is calculated. Herein, the optical dual sensor is switched to 100% CO2 from 100% N2 and maintained for 60 s and then again switched back to 100% N2 for 90 s. Figure 6b shows the results where this process is repeated for six complete cycles over 1200 s. The corresponding response and recovery times for CO2 are calculated to be 20 and 60 s, respectively.

3.5. Dynamic Response of the Optical Dual Sensor

Dynamic response and recovery data for the optical dual sensor are also recorded with a pattern similar to that used in the above section. Figure 7a,b shows the dynamic response and recovery for O2 and CO2, respectively. By switching the dual sensor from 100% N2 to 10% O2, the response and recovery times are calculated to be 15 and 27 s, respectively. The corresponding response and recovery times for CO2 are 34 and 42 s. Thus, the optical sensor also exhibits a rapid response and recovery at low concentrations, which makes it suitable for low-level detection.

3.6. Selectivity of Optical Dual Sensor

The presence of certain other gases under practical conditions sometimes creates interference in the appropriate operation of the gas sensor. Therefore, the selectivity of a gas sensor is also a key property to be considered. Herein, the response of the ratiometric dual sensor in the presence of nitric oxide (NO) and ammonia (NH3) was investigated. The proposed dual sensor is alternately exposed to both gases for 15 min to observe changes in fluorescence intensities. Figure 8 shows the obtained results. Under 1000 ppm NO, the fluorescence intensities of the sensor exhibit an almost negligible change. Similarly, changes are not observed in the presence of 100 ppm NH3. These results confirm that the proposed ratiometric dual sensor does not exhibit any interference by NH3 and NO.

3.7. Cross Sensitivity of the Optical Dual Sensor

The ratiometric dual-sensor does not show cross-sensitivity while a substantial change in the intensity of O2 sensitive material at 650 nm is observed (Section 3.3) in the presence of CO2. This observed cross-sensitivity arises due to a change in the absorption part of phenol red which is overlapped with the emission of the PtTFPP complex. Therefore, a cross-sensitivity calibration for the ratiometric dual sensor is required for its practical applications. We have calibrated the response of the PtTFPP complex at different fixed CO2 concentrations. At each fixed CO2 concentrations, the fluorescence response of the PtTFPP complex at different O2 concentrations is recorded. At each fixed O2 concentrations, the fluorescence response of the CdSe/ZnS QDs (A570) at different CO2 concentrations is also recorded. The corresponding ratiometric sensitivities for O2 and CO2 are also calculated and plotted as shown in Figure 9a,b, respectively. The figure displays the ratiometric sensitivities for O2/CO2 at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of fixed CO2/O2 concentrations. The sensitivity calibration plot shows a decrease in CO2 sensitivity with increasing fixed O2 concentration with a minimum obtained at 80% of fixed O2 concentration.

3.8. Humidity and Temperature Effect of the Optical Dual Sensor

The ratiometric dual sensor is placed in different humid environments to observe changes in sensitivities for O2 and CO2. Figure 10 plots the sensitivities calculated at three values of relative humidity (RH) for different gaseous concentrations. The results in Figure 10a reveal no significant changes in the O2 sensitivities, while the CO2 sensitivity increases with the decrease in the RH value from 67% to 50%. However, with the further decrease in RH to 25%, the sensitivity decreases to its lowest value.
Previous studies have reported that gas sensors are extremely sensitive to temperature changes. In this section, the effect of temperature changes on the sensitivities of the dual sensor is examined. Figure 11 shows the relationship between sensitivities of O2 and CO2 at different elevated temperatures. With the increase in the working temperature from 22 to 60 °C, the sensitivity of O2 does not exhibit a significant change, whereas the CO2 sensitivity decreases from 58 to 5.

4. Conclusions

This work presents a new optical dual sensor for the simultaneous detection of O2 and CO2 based on the fluorescence ratiometric referencing method. The dual sensor employed PtTFPP as the O2 indicator, a combination of CdSe/ZnS (A570) and phenol red as the CO2 indicator, and CdSe/ZnS (A460) as the reference signal. The combine sensing materials can be excited by the same LED with a central wavelength of 380 nm, and their bright fluorescence has no spectral overlaps or cross-talk. The experimental result revealed the ratiometric sensitivity for O2 is 13 with a response and recovery times of 10 and 35 s, respectively, while the corresponding sensitivity for CO2 is found to be 144 with a response and recovery times of the 20 and 60 s, respectively. The proposed dual sensor makes it possible measure O2 and CO2 simultaneously more precisely. The ratiometric optical dual sensor developed in this study is insensitive to fluctuations in excitation and external light intensities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and problem formulation, C.-S.C.; experiment and writing-original draft preparation, D.K.; funding acquisition, C.-S.C.; writing review and editing, C.-S.C.; All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to this study by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant No. MOST 107-2221-E-131-016-MY2, 109-2221-E-131-005-MY2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict interest.

References

  1. Zhang, X.; Xuan, W.; Yin, P.; Wang, L.; Wu, X.; Wu, Q. Gastric tonometry guided therapy in critical care patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care 2015, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Monitoring, H. Monitoring of standard hemodynamic parameters: Heart rate, systemic blood pressure, atrial pressure, pulse oximetry, and end-tidal CO2. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  3. Storre, J.H.; Magnet, F.S.; Dreher, M.; Windisch, W. Transcutaneous monitoring as a replacement for arterial pCO2 monitoring during nocturnal non-invasive ventilation. Respir. Med. 2011, 105, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mikołajczyk, J.; Bielecki, Z.; Stacewicz, T.; Smulko, J.; Wojtas, J.; Szabra, D.; Lentka, Ł.; Prokopiuk, A.; Magryta, P. Detection of Gaseous Compounds with Different Techniques. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 2016, 23, 205–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shin, Y.H.; Gutierrez-Wing, M.T.; Choi, T.W. Review-Recent Progress in Portable Fluorescence Sensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 017502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chu, C.S.; Lo, Y.L.; Sung, T.W. Review on recent developments of fluorescent oxygen and carbon dioxide optical fiber sensors. Photonic Sens. 2011, 1, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zieger, S.E.; Mosshammer, M.; Kühl, M.; Koren, K. Hyperspectral Luminescence Imaging in Combination with Signal Deconvolution Enables Reliable Multi-Indicator-Based Chemical Sensing. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, C.; Otto, S.; Dorn, M.; Heinze, K.; Resch-Genger, U. Luminescent TOP Nanosensors for Simultaneously Measureing Temperature, Oxygen, and pH at a Single Excitation Wavelength. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wolfbeis, O.S.; Weis, L.J.; Ziegler, W.E.; Leiner, M.J.P. Fiber-Optic Fluorosensor for Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 2028–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Borisov, S.M.; Krause, C.; Arain, S.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Composite material for simultaneous and contactless luminescent sensing and imaging of oxygen and carbon dioxide. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1511–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schroeder, C.R.; Neurauter, G.; Klimant, I. Luminescent dual sensor for time-resolved imaging of pCO2 and pO2 in aquatic systems. Microchim. Acta 2007, 158, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chu, C.S.; Syu, J.J. Optical sensor for dual sensing of oxygen and carbon dioxide based on sensing films coated on filter paper. Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 1225–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Davenport, J.J.; Hickey, M.; Phillips, J.P.; Kyriacou, P.A. Dual: pO2/pCO2 fibre optic sensing film. Analyst 2017, 142, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nagl, S.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Optical multiple chemical sensing: Status and current challenges. Analyst 2007, 6, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chu, C.S.; Chuang, C.Y. Ratiometric optical fiber dissolved oxygen sensor based on metallo-porphyrin and CdSe quantum dots embedded in sol–gel matrix. J. Lumin. 2015, 167, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chu, C.S.; Chuang, C.Y. Ratiometric optical fiber sensor for dual sensing of copper ion and dissolved oxygen. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, 10659–10665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Quaranta, M.; Borisov, S.M.; Klimant, I. Indicators for optical oxygen sensors. Bioanal. Rev. 2012, 4, 115–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chu, C.S.; Lo, Y.L. Highly sensitive and linear calibration optical fiber oxygen sensor based on Pt (II) complex embedded in sol–gel matrix. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 2011, 155, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, S.K.; Okura, I. Photostable Optical Oxygen Sensing Material: Platinum Tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin Immobilized in Polystyrene. Anal. Commun. 1997, 34, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Borisov, S.M.; Vasylevska, A.S.; Krause, C.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Composite luminescent material for dual sensing of oxygen and temperature. Nano Lett. 2006, 16, 1536–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borisov, S.M.; Lehner, P.; Klimant, I. Novel optical trace oxygen sensors based on platinum(II) and palladium(II) complexes with 5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorphenyl)-porphyrin covalently immobilized on silica-gel particles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 690, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mills, A.; Chang, Q.; McMurray, N. Equilibrium Studies on Colorimetric Plastic Film Sensors for Carbon Dioxide. Anal. Chem. 1992, 64, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Freeman, A. Electrodes for Blood pO2, and pCO2 Determination. J. Appl. Physiol. 1958, 13, 515–520. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mills, A.; Lepre, A.; Wild, L. Breath-by-breath measurement of carbon dioxide using a plastic film optical sensor. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 1997, 39, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Munkholm, C.; Walt, D.R.; Milanovich, F.P. A fiber-optic sensor for CO2 measurement. Talanta 1988, 35, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mills, A.; Chang, Q. Fluorescence plastic thin-film sensor for carbon dioxide. Analyst 1993, 118, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nakamura, N.; Amao, Y. Optical sensor for carbon dioxide combining colorimetric change of a pH indicator and a reference luminescent dye. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 376, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Amao, Y.; Nakamura, N. Optical CO2 sensor with the combination of colorimetric change of α-naphtholphthalein and internal reference fluorescent porphyrin dye. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 100, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Borisov, S.M.; Seifner, R.; Klimant, I. A novel planar optical sensor for simultaneous monitoring of oxygen, carbon dioxide, pH and temperature. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 2463–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Borisov, S.M.; Neurauter, G.; Schroeder, C.; Klimant, I.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Modified dual lifetime referencing method for simultaneous optical determination and sensing of two analytes. Appl. Spectrosc. 2006, 60, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liebsch, G.; Klimant, I.; Frank, B.; Holst, G.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Luminescence lifetime imaging of oxygen, pH, and carbon dioxide distribution using optical sensors. Appl. Spectrosc. 2000, 54, 548–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. de Vargas-Sansalvador, I.M.P.; Martinez-Olmos, A.; Palma, A.J.; Fernández-Ramos, M.D.; Capitán-Vallvey, L.F. Compact optical instrument for simultaneous determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide. Microchim. Acta 2011, 172, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chu, C.S.; Lo, Y.L.; Sung, T.W. Enhanced oxygen sensing properties of Pt(II) complex and dye entrapped core-shell silica nanoparticles embedded in sol-gel matrix. Talanta 2010, 82, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ertekin, K.; Klimant, I.; Neurauter, G.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Characterization of a reservoir-type capillary optical microsensor for pCO(2) measurements. Talanta 2003, 59, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) TEM image of CdSe/ZnS QDs at a resolution of 20 nm and (b) EDX analysis results for CdSe/ZnS QDs.
Figure 1. (a) TEM image of CdSe/ZnS QDs at a resolution of 20 nm and (b) EDX analysis results for CdSe/ZnS QDs.
Sensors 21 04057 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing experimental arrangement used for characterization.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing experimental arrangement used for characterization.
Sensors 21 04057 g002
Figure 3. (a) Emission and (b) absorption spectra of PtTFPP, CdSe/ZnS (A570), and (A460) QDs.
Figure 3. (a) Emission and (b) absorption spectra of PtTFPP, CdSe/ZnS (A570), and (A460) QDs.
Sensors 21 04057 g003
Figure 4. (a) Response of the optical dual sensor under exposure to different O2 concentrations and (b) Stern-Volmer plots.
Figure 4. (a) Response of the optical dual sensor under exposure to different O2 concentrations and (b) Stern-Volmer plots.
Sensors 21 04057 g004
Figure 5. (a) Response of the optical dual sensor under exposure to seven CO2 concentrations and (b) Variation of R/R0 with 0-100% CO2 concentrations.
Figure 5. (a) Response of the optical dual sensor under exposure to seven CO2 concentrations and (b) Variation of R/R0 with 0-100% CO2 concentrations.
Sensors 21 04057 g005
Figure 6. Response and recovery plots of the optical dual sensor for (a) O2 and (b) CO2.
Figure 6. Response and recovery plots of the optical dual sensor for (a) O2 and (b) CO2.
Sensors 21 04057 g006
Figure 7. Dynamic response times of the optical dual sensor for (a) O2 and (b) CO2.
Figure 7. Dynamic response times of the optical dual sensor for (a) O2 and (b) CO2.
Sensors 21 04057 g007
Figure 8. Responses of the optical dual sensor towards (a) NO and (b) NH3.
Figure 8. Responses of the optical dual sensor towards (a) NO and (b) NH3.
Sensors 21 04057 g008
Figure 9. Cross-sensitivity calibration of the dual sensor for (a) O2 and (b) CO2.
Figure 9. Cross-sensitivity calibration of the dual sensor for (a) O2 and (b) CO2.
Sensors 21 04057 g009
Figure 10. Effect of humidity on the sensitivities of (a) O2 and (b) CO2 of the optical dual sensor.
Figure 10. Effect of humidity on the sensitivities of (a) O2 and (b) CO2 of the optical dual sensor.
Sensors 21 04057 g010
Figure 11. Effect of temperature on the sensitivities of (a) O2 and (b) CO2 of the optical dual sensor.
Figure 11. Effect of temperature on the sensitivities of (a) O2 and (b) CO2 of the optical dual sensor.
Sensors 21 04057 g011
Table 1. Properties of typical optical O2 and CO2 dual sensors.
Table 1. Properties of typical optical O2 and CO2 dual sensors.
O2 ProbeCO2 Probeλex (nm)λem (nm)
O2/CO2
O2/CO2 RangeResponseSensing TypeReference
RTDPHPTS460630/520 0–20 kPa/0–20 kPaNoneDual layer/Intensity[8]
PtTFPPHPTS and Ir2(C30)4Cl2525 (O2)
470 (CO2)
630/5800–20%/0–18%O2:30 s
CO2:3 min
Dual layer/Lifetime[9]
Ru(II)(TOA)3HPTS460605/5120–210.6 hPa/0–25.1 hPaNoneSingle layer/Lifetime[10]
PtTFPP/AFCHPTS405650/4870–100%/0–100%O2:15 s
CO2:7 s
Dual layer[11]
PtOEPHPTS470645/5150–10 kPa/0–61 kPaO2:5 s
CO2:None
Intensity[13]
Ir(II)HPTS450560/5200–20 kPa/0–4 kPaO2:19 s
CO2:49 s
Dual layer
/Intensity and Lifetime
[29]
Ru(II)HPTS470620/5200–20%/0–8%NoneSingle layer/Lifetime[30]
PtOEPRu(II) and m-cresol purple470646/6300–210 hPa/0–200 hPaNoneNot available/Lifetime[31]
PtOEPPtOEP and
α-naphtholphthalein
525646/6460–30%/0–100%O2:31 s
CO2:31 s
Not available/Lifetime[32]
PtTFPPCdSe/ZnS and
Phenol red
380650/5750–100%/0–100%O2:10 s
CO2:20 s
Single layer/Intensity (ratiometric)This
work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, D.; Chu, C.-S. A Ratiometric Optical Dual Sensor for the Simultaneous Detection of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide. Sensors 2021, 21, 4057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124057

AMA Style

Kumar D, Chu C-S. A Ratiometric Optical Dual Sensor for the Simultaneous Detection of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide. Sensors. 2021; 21(12):4057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Divyanshu, and Cheng-Shane Chu. 2021. "A Ratiometric Optical Dual Sensor for the Simultaneous Detection of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide" Sensors 21, no. 12: 4057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop