Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Null Widening Beamforming Algorithm in Spatially Correlated Color Noise
Previous Article in Journal
A Deep Q-Network-Based Algorithm for Multi-Connectivity Optimization in Heterogeneous Cellular-Networks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 22
Issue 16
10.3390/s22166181
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Azithromycin with Graphene-Modified Electrode

by
Florina Pogăcean
1,
Codruţa Varodi
1,
Lidia Măgeruşan
1,
Raluca-Ioana Stefan-van Staden
2,3 and
Stela Pruneanu
1,*
1
National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, 67-103, Donat Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Laboratory of Electrochemistry and PATLAB, National Institute of Research for Electrochemistry and Condensed Matter, 202 Splaiul Independentei Str., 060021 Bucharest, Romania
3
Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Material Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(16), 6181; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166181
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Revised: 2 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 18 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An electrochemical cell containing two graphite rods was filled with the appropriate electrolyte (0.2 M ammonia + 0.2 M ammonium sulphate) and connected to the exfoliation system to synthesize graphene (EGr). A bias of 7 V was applied between the anode and cathode for 3 h. After synthesis, the morphology and structure of the sample was characterized by SEM, XRD, and FTIR techniques. The material was deposited onto the surface of a glassy carbon (GC) electrode (EGr/GC) and employed for the electrochemical detection of azithromycin (AZT). The DPV signals recorded in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT revealed significant differences between the GC and EGr/GC electrodes. For EGr/GC, the oxidation peak was higher and appeared at lower potential (+1.12 V) compared with that of bare GC (+1.35 V). The linear range for AZT obtained with the EGr/GC electrode was very wide, 10−8–10−5 M, the sensitivity was 0.68 A/M, and the detection limit was 3.03 × 10−9 M. It is important to mention that the sensitivity of EGr/GC was three times higher than that of bare GC (0.23 A/M), proving the advantages of using graphene-modified electrodes in the electrochemical detection of AZT.

1. Introduction

For many years, infectious diseases have represented a difficult, persistent, and on-going public health challenge. However, by the mid-1900s, following the introduction of antibiotics, the mortality rate of infectious illnesses had significantly decreased [1]. Selman Waksman used the word “antibiotic” for the first time to describe any tiny chemical generated by bacteria that inhibits the development of other microorganisms [2], and the “antibiotic golden age” (1940–1960s) saw the discovery of the majority of the antibiotic classes currently in use. They were hailed as a “medical miracle” because of their influence on the fate of humanity [3]. In order to kill germs or prevent them from proliferating, antibiotics—sometimes called antibacterials or antimicrobials—disrupt critical bacterial activities. Over time, bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics, which reduces their effectiveness [4]. Thus, in order to minimize antibiotic resistance, proper antibiotic usage is crucial.
Azithromycin (AZT), an azalide—a subclass of macrolide-type antibiotics, is a second-generation broad-spectrum antibiotic with a long half-life and a high tissue penetration degree [5], primarily administered in a wide variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infections, such as respiratory, dermal, genitourinary, sexually transmitted, and enteric infections. In addition to the antimicrobial properties, AZT has immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects [6]. AZT has received increased attention because of additional benefits to stimulate defense reactions, being administered in chronic respiratory inflammatory diseases including diffuse panbronchiolitis, post-transplant bronchiolitis, and rosacea. Furthermore, the modulation of host responses facilitates its long-term therapeutic benefit in cystic fibrosis, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and noneosinophilic asthma [7]. Other recommended uses of AZT include the treatment of H. pylori infection; travelers’ diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal infections; Legionnaires’ disease (a type of lung infection); pertussis (whooping cough; a serious infection that can cause severe coughing); Lyme disease; severe infection or persistent lymphadenopathy due to Bartonella henselae (cat-scratch disease); and some tick-borne infections such as Australian tick typhus or scrub typhus. It is also employed as part of combined therapy for M. avium complex infections and babesiosis [8]. AZT is administered to prevent heart infection in people having dental or other procedures, and to prevent STD in victims of sexual assault. Nowadays, it is still unclear how AZT may affect both human and environmental health. Thus, in addition to more effective antibiotic usage management, there is also an urgent need to develop rigorous control methods to track medication concentrations in pharmaceutical formulations, biological fluids, or even in medium. The residues of antibiotics in the environment pose a potential health hazard. Among all antibiotics, AZT has one of the greatest concentrations in aqueous matrices [9]. Therefore, developing sensitive and selective analytical tools for AZY assay is essential. Until now, a variety of methods have been employed for this purpose, including: microbioassays [10,11]; high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection or fluorescence detection [12,13,14]; gas chromatography with electron capture (GC–EC) or with mass spectroscopy (GC–MS) [15,16]; UV–Vis spectroscopy [17]; FTIR transmission spectroscopy [18]; spectrofluorometric method [19]; electrophoresis [20,21]; colorimetry [22]; and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) [23].
However, most of the reported methods present serious drawbacks since the microbiological approaches need long incubation periods and are affected by limited detection ability and poor accuracy [24,25], while the chromatographic and spectroscopic methods require complicated extraction or derivatization procedures that imply expensive and sophisticated equipment, high costs, and long-time analysis [26]. Under these circumstances, electrochemical assays have gained popularity due to the high sensitivity, ease of preparation, and real-time detection [27,28,29,30]. The electrochemical behavior of AZT has been related to the oxidation of tertiary amino groups [31]. Different voltammetric procedures have been applied for AZT electrochemical oxidation and quantification, including cyclic voltammetry and adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination [32,33]; linear sweep and differential pulse voltammetry [34]; and square wave striping voltammetry [35]. During the past decades, surface electrode modification represented a significant field in electrochemistry study and has been frequently employed to enhance electrochemical reactions [36,37]. A variety of surface modifiers have been used for AZT electrochemical assay: multiwall carbon nanotubes decorated with MgCr2O4 [38]; aniline [39]; renewable silver amalgam [40]; and ionic liquids [41]. Among the various types of surface modifiers, carbon-based materials, including graphenes, have brought major improvement in the development of electrochemical sensors [42,43].
With several surprising features in its two-dimensional structure [44], graphene has made its way into the mainstream of electrochemical analysis since it can enhance the modified electrodes’ performances by increasing the electron transfer efficiency, increasing the active area, as well as facilitating the interaction with the studied analyte [45]. However, its practical applicability is somewhat limited since simple methods for the mass production of high-quality large-area graphene have not been developed in an efficient manner. Since its discovery in 2004 [46], graphene production has followed several routes, namely: top-down (e.g., micromechanical cleavage [47]; electrochemical exfoliation [48]; exfoliation of graphite intercalation compounds [49]; solvent-based exfoliation [50,51]; exfoliation of graphite oxide [52]; arc discharge [53]; unzipping [54]) and bottom-up approaches (e.g., epitaxial growth [55]; chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [56,57]; flash pyrolysis [58]; reduction in carbon-containing species [59]). Despite so many existing methods, the large-scale production of high-quality graphene is still a challenge and, apparently, graphite electrochemical exfoliation offers the most suitable alternative for obtaining good quality materials in environmentally friendly conditions.
In this work, we present a simple approach for modifying a glassy carbon electrode with graphene obtained by a simple electrochemical method, without the use of organic solvents. The modified electrode exhibits improved characteristics both in terms of sensitivity and the detection limit of AZT, in comparison with bare GC. In addition, we used the standard addition method for the quantification of AZT in spiked samples, demonstrating excellent results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

High purity (99.995%) graphite rods (10 cm length; 6 mm diameter) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sternheim, Germany) and were employed during electrochemical exfoliation. Ammonium sulphate was bought from Reactivul Bucuresti (Bucharest, Romania), while the ammonia solution (25%) was purchased from POCH SA (Gliwice, Poland). Azithromycin (AZT) was purchased from HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Limited (Mumbai, India), uric acid (≥99%, UA), dopamine hydrochloride (99%, DA), and dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Alfa-Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany), while L-tyrosine (Tyr) was purchased from Fluka BioChemika (Buchs, Switzerland). Glacial acetic acid (99.5%) was purchased from CHEMICAL COMPANY (Iași, Romania) and sodium acetate was purchased from Reactivul Bucuresti (Bucharest, Romania). Sodium dihydrogen phosphate (99.7%) and di-sodium hydrogen phosphate anhydrous (100%) were purchased from VWR Chemicals (Leuven, Belgium). Acetate buffer was employed for the preparation of the solutions with pH 3.6, 4.4, and 5. Phosphate buffer was employed for the preparation of the solutions with pH 6 and 7.

2.2. Standard Addition Method

For azithromycin determination using the standard addition method, the following procedure was applied. In 5 mL of acetate buffer solution (pH 5), a proper amount (0.38 µL) from the commercially available pharmaceutical drug (SANDOZ; 100 mg/5 mL; 2.6 × 10−2 M AZT solution) was added, so the final concentration of the drug was 2 × 10−7 M AZT. This was denoted as the real concentration (Creal) of the drug. Next, three equal volumes (50 µL) from 10−4 M AZT stock solution (in ethanol) were added to the beaker under continuous stirring and the current increase was read after each addition (+1.15 V applied potential). The current step was plotted versus the concentration, allowing us to determine the AZT (Cx) in the analyzed drug, resulting in Cx = 1.76 × 10−7 M, while Creal = 2 × 10−7 M. The recovery was determined as the Cx/Creal ratio (88.45%). It is important to mention that the recovery data obtained for several drug solutions of different concentrations ranged from 80 to 88.45%, indicating that some of the interfering species may interact with the electrode surface. According to the drug leaflet, the powder also contains sugar, xanthan gum, hydroxypropyl cellulose, anhydrous trisodium phosphate, anhydrous colloidal silicon dioxide, aspartame (E 951), caramel cream flavor, and titanium dioxide (E 171).

2.3. Apparatus

The morphological characteristics of the graphene sample were investigated with a Hitachi HD2700 instrument (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a cold field emission gun (CSEG).
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) was employed for the structural investigations of the graphene sample. The sample was dispersed in DMF (0.2 mg/mL) and then deposited onto the surface of an amorphous quartz substrate. A D8 Advance Diffractometer (Brucker, Germany), 40 kV, 0.5 mA, equipped with a LYNXEXE detector (λ = 1.5406 Å) was employed.
The FTIR spectrum of graphene was recorded with a JASCO 6100 FTIR spectrometer (Jasco Inc., Easton, MD, USA), within a 4000–400 cm−1 spectral domain (4 cm−1 resolution). About 0.3 mg of graphene was mixed with KBr powder and pressed in a thin pellet, before recording the spectrum.
A Christ-Alpha 1–4 LSC freeze dryer equipment (Martin Christ, Osterode am Harz, Germany) was employed for drying the graphene sample after electrochemical exfoliation of the graphite rods.
For the electrochemical measurements (differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and amperometry), the cell containing three electrodes was coupled with a Potentiostat/Galvanostat Instrument PGSTAT-302N (Metrohm-Autolab B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands). The GC (3 mm diameter) or the EGr/GC electrode was employed as a working electrode, together with a Ag/AgCl reference (3 M KCl) and a large foil platinum counter electrode. The DPV measurements were generally recorded from 0.5 to +1.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl, at a 10 mV/s scanning rate (0.05 s pulse time; 0.025 V pulse amplitude), while the amperometric measurements were recorded at +1.12 V (for the EGr/GC electrode) and +1.35 V (for the bare GC electrode).

2.4. Synthesis of Exfoliated Graphene Sample (EGr)

An electrochemical cell containing two graphite rods (anode and cathode, 2 cm apart) was filled with the appropriate electrolyte (0.2 M ammonia + 0.2 M ammonium sulphate) and connected to the exfoliation system (a power supply, a static switch with adjustable parameters, and a Hewlett Packard 8005B pulse generator). The pulse generator allowed us to set the time parameters of the current pulses, such as the duration (0.8 s) and the pause between two pulses (0.2 s) [60]. During the exfoliation process, a bias of 7 V was applied between the anode and cathode (for 3 h). At the end, the material was washed with a large amount (8 L) of distilled water by decantation, filtered with Whatman qualitative filter paper (white ribbon), and finally dried by lyophilisation. Following this process, the sample was denoted EGr.

2.5. Preparation of Graphene-Modified Electrode (EGr/GC)

N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was chosen as the organic solvent for the dispersion of the graphene sample (2 mg/mL). DMF has a higher boiling point (153 °C) in comparison with that of ethanol (78.37 °C) or distilled water (100 °C), which means that it evaporates slower at room temperature. Consequently, the graphene flakes from DMF solution have a longer time to interact by π–π stacking with the electrode surface, leading to the formation of a very stable layer on top of the GC electrode. A total of 10 µL from the graphene dispersion in DMF, previously homogenized with an ultrasonic device (SONICS Vibra-Cell), was deposited by the drop-casting method onto the GC electrode and dried at room temperature for 24 h. After that, the modified electrode (EGr/GC) was used for AZT electrochemical detection and quantification.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological and Structural Investigation of EGr Sample

Figure 1 shows representative SEM/TEM micrographs of the graphene sample obtained after the exfoliation of the graphite rods. Here, one can see that some of the flakes are very large (e.g., 25 µm length; left side in Figure 1a) and have a smooth surface, while others are smaller and exhibit a wrinkled appearance. The edges of the flakes appear as bright lines. Figure 1b, obtained at higher magnification, reveals that the flakes are also thin and randomly oriented, generating a highly porous layer. The porous morphology of graphene deposited on top of a conductive substrate is highly beneficial in electrochemical investigations due to the increase in the active area of the modified electrode. The high transparency of graphene layers is clearly evidenced by the TEM micrograph presented in Figure 1c.
The structural characteristics of the graphene sample were next investigated by the XRD technique. The pattern of the sample can be seen in Figure 2, evidencing two main peaks: the first one (at 21.23°) is very broad and corresponds to the reflections of few-layer graphene (FLG), while the second one (at 26.47°) is sharp and corresponds to the reflections of multilayer graphene (MLG). The amount of FLG present within the sample is predominant (95%) in comparison with MLG (5%) (see the inset of Figure 2). We also determined the mean size of graphene crystallite (D), the interlayer spacing (d), and the average number of layers present within the graphene crystallites (n) [61]. These values are also listed in the inset. It is interesting to observe that the interlayer spacing (d) is 0.467 nm in FLG and 0.374 nm in MLG, both being larger than the typical value in graphite (0.335 nm). The large interlayer spacing in FLG may be attributed to a higher number of oxygen-containing groups attached to the graphene sheets. FLG is the main product in the sample, and it is generated at the anode where the outer layers of graphite are electrochemically oxidized. In contrast, MLG flakes which have a smaller interlayer distance (less oxidized) are mainly generated at the cathode, due to gas evolution.
Next, more information about the vibration characteristics of the functional groups attached to the graphene surface was obtained by the FTIR technique. The spectrum of the sample embedded in the KBr pellet is presented in Figure 3. In good agreement with the literature [62], the vibration bands of some oxygen-containing groups can be observed, but, due to the mild exfoliation process, their intensity is not very high. The broad band at around 3400 cm−1 can be assigned to the O–H stretching vibrations from the adsorbed water molecules, while the 1383 cm−1 band is assigned to the C–O stretching vibrations of the functional groups attached to graphene. The large shoulder at around 3000 cm−1 may be attributed to the aromatic C–H stretching bands, which are weak-to-moderate bands. The other two important bands are the aromatic ring stretching vibrations centred at around 1638 and 1577 cm−1, which generally appear as a pair of band structures. These bands are characteristic of the vibration modes of the sp2-hybridized carbon atoms (C=C).
Raman analysis is useful for determining the structural properties of graphitic materials. The defect (D) band at 1355 cm−1, the graphite (G) band at 1582 cm−1, and the 2D bands at 2708 cm−1, generated by the in-plane vibrations [63], shear modes [64], and the layer-breathing modes [65], are the most noticeable characteristics of the EGr spectrum (Figure 4). The Raman bands serve as a measure of the sample quality. In our case, the position of these spectral features is slightly shifted compared to other reported results [66], indicating the presence of some structural defects in the material [67]. However, the created defects can provide active sites for the electrochemical detection of AZT. The disorder extent was quantified based on the ID/IG ratio [68], which was found to be 1.073. According to the Tuinstra and Koenig Equation (1) [69], the ID/IG ratio is inversely correlated with the defect-free domain or the in-plane crystallite size (La):
ID/IG = C(λ)/La
where C(λ) is a constant that depends on the radiation wavelength. La was determined to be 17.91 nm. This is a large value, so we can assume that the majority of the defects are located at graphene edges. This is in excellent agreement with the SEM/TEM micrographs, which revealed that the basal planes of graphenes are generally smooth and defect-free.

3.2. Electrochemical Studies

The first experiments with EGr/GC electrodes were focused on studying the effect of the solution pH on the electrochemical response of AZT (10−5 M). The DPV technique was employed, and the selected pH range was 3.6–7.0. Since the pKa of azithromycin is 7.34 [70], this molecule exists in the cationic form at pH < pKa. As can be seen in Figure 5, in highly acidic solution (pH 3.6), the peak potential is very high (+1.35 V) and shifts towards lower values (+1.1 V) in neutral solution. The peak current (Ip) is well-defined above pH 4.4 and has a maximum value at pH 5. At pH value close to pKa, the peak current starts to decrease (see the inset of Figure 5) due to the slight deprotonation of AZT.
As can be seen in Scheme 1, azithromycin has various functional groups (hydroxyl, amine) that can be electrochemically oxidized. Generally, the amine group is easily oxidized by the loss of one electron, generating a radical cation [71]. In the case of AZT, one of the nitrogen atoms (N9) is situated in the macrocyclic lactone ring and so its lone pair of electrons cannot be easily removed, in comparison with the electrons in N3’s lone pair set. Wang et al. [72] have studied the electrochemical oxidation of another drug, erythromycin, which has a similar structure to AZT but without a nitrogen atom in the macrocyclic lactone ring. They reported that erythromycin exhibits similar voltammetric behaviour and the observed oxidation peak was attributed to the loss of one electron from N3’s lone pair. Therefore, in solutions with pH < pKa, the electrochemical oxidation of AZT proceeds via the initial deprotonation of the N3 atom followed by the subsequent loss of one electron and the formation of a radical cation. The reaction is irreversible, with no peak in the reverse scan.
According to the study of Montenez [73], AZT is a hydrophobic molecule, due to the partial shielding of the N3 amino group by the methyl groups. Since graphene also has hydrophobic regions, especially the basal planes of the layers, AZT may interact by hydrophobic forces with the electrode surface and oxidation half reactions are facilitated.
According to the literature [73], in solutions with pH < pKa, the electrochemical oxidation of AZT proceeds via the initial deprotonation of the N3 atom, followed by the subsequent loss of one electron and the formation of a radical cation. The reaction is irreversible, with no peak in the reverse scan (according to the cyclic voltammetric measurements; data not shown).
In order to determine the number of electrons involved in the oxidation reaction, the Laviron Equation (2) was employed [74]. The equation shows the variation of the peak potential, Ep, with the natural logarithm of the scan rate, lnυ, for irreversible reactions (linear sweep voltammetry).
E p = E 0 ′ + R T α a n F ln R T k s α a n F − R T α a n F ln υ
where αa is the charge transfer coefficient, ks, the standard rate constant of the surface reaction, n is the number of electrons involved in the reaction, and E0′ is the formal potential.
LSVs were recorded in the acetate buffer (pH 5) solution containing 6 × 10−5 M azithromycin by varying the scan rate from 2 to 100 mV/s. Using the Ep vs. lnυ plot, we determined nαa from the corresponding slope (Figure 6a). The obtained value was 0.42, being close to the 0.5 value of αa in a totally irreversible electrode process. The above results demonstrate that one electron is involved in the electrochemical oxidation of azithromycin.
The pH effect on the oxidation peak potential of azithromycin was also investigated (Figure 6b). The peak potential shifted negatively with a slope of −52 mV/pH indicating that protons take part in the oxidation process. A linear relationship between Ep and pH was obtained, following the equation: Ep = 1.42 − 0.052 × pH (r2 = 0.972). Since we determined that the number of electrons involved in the redox process is 1, it is reasonable to assume that the number of hydrogen ions taking part in the electrode reaction is also 1.
The electrocatalytic properties of the synthesized material towards AZT oxidation are now discussed in comparison with those of the bare GC electrode (Figure 7). Hence, the DPV signals recorded in the pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT revealed significant differences between the two electrodes. For EGr/GC, the oxidation peak is higher and appears at lower potential (+1.12 V) compared with that of the bare GC electrode (+1.35 V). The increased sensitivity of EGr/GC cannot be attributed only to its high electrochemical roughness factor, which was determined to be 1.46 (the ratio of the real—0.041 cm2 to the geometrical—0.028 cm2 area). Other factors are the enhanced electron transfer rate at the edges of graphene sheets and the hydrophobic interaction between AZT and graphene, which may help with the orientation of N3 amine group towards graphene, favouring its oxidation.
Further analysis of AZT was investigated by recording the AZT signals at various concentrations (10−6–6 × 10−5 M) in pH 5 acetate buffer, using the DPV technique. The corresponding signals are plotted in Figure 8, while the inset shows the calibration plot obtained by representing the peak current vs. AZT concentration. It is interesting to note that the oxidation potential slightly changed with the concentration, indicating the adsorption of AZT/oxidation products on its surface. This is also reflected by the calibration plot (see the inset of Figure 8), where a saturation region can be observed above 3 × 10−5 M concentration. The linear range for AZT was 10−6–3 × 10−5 M, the sensitivity was 0.043 A/M, and the detection limit was 3.03 × 10−7 M.
Significantly better results were obtained by employing the amperometric technique (+1.12 V applied potential), as can be seen in Figure 9a,b. In this case, the linear range for AZT obtained with the EGr/GC electrode was very wide, 10−8–10−5 M, the sensitivity was 0.68 A/M, and the detection limit was 3.03 × 10−9 M. It is important to mention that the sensitivity of EGr/GC was three times higher than that of bare GC (0.23 A/M), proving the advantages of using graphene-modified electrodes in the electrochemical detection of AZT.
Next, the selectivity of the EGr/GC electrode was evaluated in the presence of various interfering biomolecules such as dopamine (DA), uric acid (UA), and tyrosine (Tyr). In Figure 10, the DPV signals recorded for 10−5 M AZT (single analyte) and for a mixture of analytes, DA + UA + Tyr + AZT (10−5 M each), are presented. All the analytes appear at well-defined oxidation potentials and their mixture led to the slight increase in the AZT oxidation peak and potential, indicating a weak influence of the interfering species.
Since the EGr/GC electrode proved to have a good selectivity, it was additionally tested for AZT quantitative analysis in pharmaceutical drug solution, using the standard addition method (Figure 11a,b). The amperometric technique was employed since it was more sensitive compared with the DPV technique. The current step obtained after each AZT addition from the drug solution (2.6 × 10−2 M; 0.38 µL) and the stock solution (10−4 M AZT; three additions of 50 µL) was read and plotted versus the concentration, allowing us to determine the concentration of the drug, Cx (Cx = 1.76 × 10−7 M; Creal = 2 × 10−7 M; Recovery = Cx/Creal = 88.45%). It is important to mention that the recovery data obtained for the three drug solutions ranged from 80 to 88.45%, indicating that some of the interfering species may interact with the electrode surface.
Based on the experimental results obtained so far with EGr/GC, several advantages of the electrode can be mentioned: a simple approach was employed to prepare the graphene-modified electrode; the modified electrode has a very wide linear range (10−8–10−5) for AZT, with excellent sensitivity (0.68 A/M); and the detection limit was 3.03 × 10−9 M (see Table 1).
The repeatability of the electrode modification method was evaluated by recording the DPV signal of five different electrodes in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT (see Figure 12). The obtained results show a slight difference, smaller than 4.8%, in the recorded current intensity, proving that the method was reliable for electrode modification.
In order to check the intra- and interday stability of EGr/GC and to prove the reproducibility of the AZT electrochemical detection method, the same modified electrode was subjected to repetitive DPV measurements, in replicate conditions, at different periods of time during a single day, covering a range of 10 h (see Figure 13a). As can be seen, the relative standard deviation between the different measurements was under 1.57%. Furthermore, the experiments were also reproduced on different days, over a long period of time, accounting for 120 days (see Figure 13b), with a very good reproducibility, since the differences in current intensity do not exceed 4.09%.

4. Conclusions

A graphene sample (EGr) was prepared by the electrochemical exfoliation of graphite rods and characterized by advanced techniques (SEM, XRD, and FTIR) to obtain information about its morphology and structure. The SEM micrographs revealed that some of the graphene flakes are large (e.g., 25 µm length) and have a smooth surface, while others are small (e.g., 2 µm length) and exhibit a wrinkled appearance. The flakes are also thin and randomly oriented, generating a highly porous layer which is beneficial in electrochemical investigations due to the increase in the active area of the modified electrode. The XRD technique evidenced that the sample contains few-layer graphene (95%) and multilayer graphene (5%), while the FTIR technique allowed the identification of the oxygen-containing groups attached to graphene. The graphene-modified electrode (EGr/GC) was next used for azithromycin (AZT) electrochemical detection and quantification. Excellent results were obtained by employing the amperometric technique (+1.12 V applied potential).

Author Contributions

F.P. and C.V. performed the electrochemical measurements; L.M. interpreted the XRD and FTIR results; R.-I.S.-v.S. and S.P. wrote and revised the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0006 (20PCCF/2018), PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-2410 (500PED/2021), and PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2021-0358, within PNCDI-III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be provided upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Alexandru Turza for recording the XRD pattern of graphene sample, to Bogdan Cozar for recording the Raman spectrum of graphene, and to Alexandra Ciorîţă and Lucian-Barbu Tudoran for SEM/TEM investigation of the graphene sample.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, P.W.; Watkins, K.; Hewlett, A. Infection control through the ages. Am. J. Infect. Control 2012, 40, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Clardy, J.; Fischbach, M.A.; Currie, C.R. The natural history of antibiotics. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. da Cunha, B.R.; Fonseca, L.P.; Calado, C.R.C. Antibiotic Discovery: Where Have We Come from, Where Do We Go? Antibiotics 2019, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poole, K. Mechanisms of bacterial biocide and antibiotic resistance. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McMullan, B.J.; Mostaghim, M. Prescribing azithromycin. Aust. Prescr. 2015, 38, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parnham, M.J.; Erakovic Haber, V.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Perletti, G.; Verleden, G.M.; Vos, R. Azithromycin: Mechanisms of action and their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 143, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wong, E.H.; Porter, J.D.; Edwards, M.R.; Johnston, S.L. The role of macrolides in asthma: Current evidence and future di-rections. Lancet Respir. Med. 2014, 2, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Antibiotic Expert Groups. Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic; Version 15; Therapeutic Guide-lines Limited: Melbourne, Australia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rebelo, P.; Pacheco, J.G.; Cordeiro, M.N.D.S.; Melo, A.; Delerue-Matos, C. Azithromycin electrochemical detection using a molecularly imprinted polymer prepared on a disposable screen-printed electrode. Anal. Meth. 2020, 12, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. British Pharmacopoeia; The Stationery Office: London, UK, 1998; Volume II, pp. 1663–1668.
  11. Salgado, H.R.N.; Roncari, A.F.F. Microbiological assay for the determination of azithromycin in ophthalmic solutions. Yaoxue Xuebao 2005, 40, 544–549. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sastre Torano, J.; Guchelaar, H.J. Quantitative determination of the macrolide antibiotics erythromycin, roxithromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography using pre-column derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride and fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1998, 720, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bahrami, G.; Mohammadi, B. A new on-line, in-tube pre-column derivatization technique for high performance liquid chromatographic determination of azithromycin in human serum. J. Chromatogr. B 2006, 830, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miguel, L.; Barbas, C. LC determination of impurities in azithromycin tablets. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003, 33, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koch, D.E.; Bhandari, A.; Close, L.; Hunter, R.P. Azithromycin extraction from municipal wastewater and quantitation using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1074, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fouda, G.H.; Schneider, R.P. Quantitative determination of the antibiotic azithromycin in human serum by high-performance liquid chro-matography (HPLC)-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry: Correlation with a standard HPLC-electrochemical method. Ther. Drug Monit. 1995, 17, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hashemi Mousavi, S.H.; Kobarfard, F.; Husain, S.W.; Tehrani, M.S.; Abroomand Azar, P.; Ahmadkhanihac, R.; Me-hdizadeh, A. A Rapid, Simple, Liquid Chromatographic-Electrospray Ionization, Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry Method for the Determination of Finasteride in Human Plasma and its Application to Pharmacokinetic Study. Iranian J. Pharm. Res. 2012, 11, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mallah, M.A.; Sherazi, S.T.H.; Mahesar, S.A.; Rauf, A. Assessment of Azithro-mycin in Pharmaceutical Formulation by Fourier-transform Infrared (FT-IR) Transmission Spectroscopy. Pak. J. Anal. Environ. Chem. 2011, 12, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  19. Khashaba, P.Y. Spectrofluorimetric analysis of certain macrolide antibiotics in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002, 27, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, A.P.; Park, J.H. Azithromycin as a new chiral selector in capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 1314–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haleem, D.; Shireen, E.; Haleem, M.; Kaye, W.; Bailer, U.; Frank, G.; Wagner, A.; Henry, S. Degradation studies of azithromycin and its spectrophotometric determination in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 19, 98–103. [Google Scholar]
  22. Almeida, V.G.; Braga, V.S.; Pacheco, W.F.; Cassella, R.J. Fluorescence determination of azithromycin in pharmaceutical formulations by using the synchronous scanning approach after its Acid derivatization. J. Fluoresc. 2013, 23, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khedr, A.; Sheha, M. Quantitative thin-layer chromatographic method of analysis of azithromycin in pure and capsule forms. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2003, 41, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Willers, C.; van Rensburg, P.J.J.; Claassens, S. Microbial signature lipid biomarker analysis—An approach that is still preferred, even amid various method modifications. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 118, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Souza-Silva, E.A.; Jiang, R.; Rodriguez-Lafuente, A.; Gionfriddo, E.; Pawliszyn, J. A critical review of the state of the art of solid-phase microextraction of complex matrices, I. environmental analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 71, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Peris-Vicente, J.; Peris-García, E.; Albiol-Chiva, J.; Durgbanshi, A.; Ochoa-Aranda, E.; Carda-Broch, S.; Bose, D.; Esteve-Romero, J. Liquid chromatography, a valuable tool in the determination of antibiotics in biological, food and environmental samples. Microchem. J. 2022, 177, 107309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Piovesan, J.V.; de Lima, C.A.; Santana, E.R.; Spinelli, A. Voltammetric determination of condensed tannins with a glassy carbon electrode chemically modified with gold nanoparticles stabilized in carboxymethylcellulose. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 240, 838–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kesavan, G.; Pichumani, M.; Chen, S.-M.; Ko, C.-S. Surfactant-assisted (CTAB, PVA, PVP) thermal decomposition synthesis of strontium spinel ferrite nanocrystals for electrochemical sensing of cytostatic drug flutamide. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 26, 101045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, G.; Qi, X.; Zhang, G.; Wang, S.; Li, K.; Wu, J.; Wan, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q. Low-cost voltammetric sensors for robust determination of toxic Cd(II) and Pb(II) in environment and food based on shuttle-like α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles decorated β-Bi2O3 microspheres. Microchem. J. 2022, 179, 107515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, G.; Qi, X.; Wu, J.; Xu, L.; Wan, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q. Ultrasensitive, label-free voltammetric determination of norfloxacin based on molecularly imprinted polymers and Au nanoparticle-functionalized black phosphorus nanosheet nanocomposite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 436, 129107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Farghaly, O.A.E.-M.; Mohamed, N.A.L. Voltammetric determination of azithromycin at the carbon paste electrode. Talanta 2004, 62, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Komorsky-Lovrić, Š.; Nigović, B. Identification of 5-aminosalicylic acid, ciprofloxacin and azithromycin by abrasive stripping voltammetry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 36, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yunhua, W.; Xiaobo, J.; Shengshui, H. Studies on electrochemical oxidation of azithromycin and its interaction with bovine serum albumin. Bioelectrochemistry 2004, 64, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nigovic, B.; Simunic, B. Voltammetric assay of azithromycin in pharmaceutical dosage forms. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003, 32, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bitew, Z.; Amare, M. Recent reports on electrochemical determination of selected antibiotics in pharmaceutical formulations: A mini review. Electrochem. Commun. 2020, 121, 106863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, F.; Ni, B.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, G. A simple and efficient voltammetric sensor for dopamine determination based on ZnO nanorods/electro-reduced graphene oxide composite. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 26, 101375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jayaraman, N.; Palani, Y.; Jonnalagadda, R.R.; Shanmugam, E. Covalently dual functionalized graphene oxide-based multiplex electrochemical sensor for Hg(II) and Cr(VI) detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 367, 132165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ensafi, A.A.; Allafchian, A.R.; Rezaei, B. A sensitive and selective voltammetric sensor based on multiwall carbon nanotubes decorated with MgCr2O4 for the determination of azithromycin. Colloids Surf. B 2013, 103, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jafari, S.; Dehghani, M.; Nasirizadeh, N.; Azim-zadeh, M. An azithromycin electrochemical sensor based on an aniline MIP film electropolymerized on a gold nano urchins/graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 829, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vajdle, O.; Guzsvány, V.; Škoric, D.; Csanádi, J.; Petkovic, M.; Avramov-Ivic, M.; Kónya, Z.; Petrovic, S.; Bobrowski, A. Voltammetric behavior and determination of the macrolide antibiotics azithromycin, clarithromycin and roxithromycin at a renewable silver–amalgam film electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 229, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peng, J.Y.; Hou, C.T.; Liu, X.X.; Li, H.B.; Hu, X.Y. Electrochemical behavior of azithromycin at graphene and ionic liquid composite film modified electrode. Talanta 2011, 86, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, K.; Lu, L.; Wen, Y.; Xu, J.; Duan, X.; Zhang, L.; Hu, D.; Nie, T. Facile synthesis of the necklace-like graphene oxide-multi-walled carbon nanotube nanohybrid and its application in electrochemical sensing of Azithromycin. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 787, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stoian, I.-A.; Iacob, B.-C.; Dudaș, C.-L.; Barbu-Tudoran, L.; Bogdan, D.; Marian, I.O.; Bodoki, E.; Oprean, R. Biomimetic electrochemical sensor for the highly selective detection of azithromycin in biological samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 155, 112098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pumera, M.; Ambrosi, A.; Bonanni, A.; Khim Chng, E.L.; Ling Poh, H. Graphene for electrochemical sensing and biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 954–965. [Google Scholar]
  46. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Novoselov, K.S.; Jiang, D.; Schedin, F.; Booth, T.J.; Khotkevich, V.V.; Morozov, S.V.; Geim, A.K. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10451–10453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, G.; Wang, B.; Park, J.; Wang, Y.; Sun, B.; Yao, J. Highly efficient and large-scale synthesis of graphene by electrolytic exfoliation. Carbon 2009, 47, 3242–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vallés, C.; Drummond, C.; Saadaoui, H.; Furtado, C.A.; He, M.; Roubeau, O.; Ortolani, L.; Monthioux, M. Pénicaud olutions of Negatively Charged Graphene Sheets and Ribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15802–15804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Blake, P.; Brimicombe, P.D.; Nair, R.R.; Booth, T.J.; Jiang, D.; Schedin, F.; Ponomarenko, L.A.; Morozov, S.V.; Gleeson, H.F.; Hill, E.W.; et al. Graphene-Based Liquid Crystal Device. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 1704–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hernandez, Y.; Nicolosi, V.; Lotya, M.; Blighe, F.M.; Sun, Z.; De, S.; McGovern, I.T.; Holland, B.; Byrne, M.; Gun’ko, Y.K.; et al. High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hummers, W.S.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Farhat, S.; Scott, C.D. Review of the Arc Process Modeling for Fullerene and Nanotube Production. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006, 6, 1189–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jiao, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Diankov, G.; Dai, H. Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature 2009, 458, 877–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sutter, P. How silicon leaves the scene. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 171–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Brownson, D.A.C.; Banks, C.E. The electrochemistry of CVD graphene: Progress and prospects. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 8264–8281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Brownson, D.A.C.; Banks, C.E. CVD graphene electrochemistry: The role of graphitic islands. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 15825–15828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Choucair, M.; Thordarson, P.; Stride, J.A. Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chakrabarti, A.; Lu, J.; Skrabutenas, J.C.; Xu, T.; Xiao, Z.; Maguire, J.A.; Hosmane, N.S. Conversion of carbon dioxide to few-layer graphene. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 9491–9493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pogacean, F.; Coros, M.; Magerusan, L.; Mirel, V.; Turza, A.; Katona, G.; Stefan-van Staden, R.-I.; Pruneanu, S. Exfoliation of graphite rods via pulses of current for graphene synthesis: Sensitive detection of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine. Talanta 2019, 196, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Coroş, M.; Pogăcean, F.; Roşu, M.C.; Socaci, C.; Borodi, G.; Măgeruşan, L.; Biriş, A.R.; Pruneanu, S. Simple and cost-effective synthesis of graphene by electrochemical exfoliation of graphite rods. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 2651–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Coates, J. Interpretation of Infrared Spectra—A Practical Approach. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2006; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ferrari, A.C.; Meyer, J.C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K.S.; Roth, S.; et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tan, P.; Han, W.; Zhao, W.; Wu, Z.H.; Chang, K.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.F.; Bonini, N.; Marzari, N.; Pugno, N.; et al. The shear mode of multilayer graphene. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lui, C.; Malard, L.M.; Kim, S.; Lantz, G.; Laverge, F.E.; Saito, R.; Heinz, T.F. Observation of layer-breathing mode vibrations in few-layer graphene through combination Raman scattering. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5539–5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ferrari, A.C. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electronephonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Magerusan, L.; Pogacean, F.; Coros, M.; Socaci, C.; Pruneanu, S.; Leustean, C.; Pana, I.O. Green methodology for the preparation of chitosan/graphene nanomaterial through electrochemical exfoliation and its applicability in Sunset Yellow detection. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 283, 578–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Malard, L.M.; Pimenta, M.A.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 2009, 473, 51–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tuinstra, F.; Koenig, J.L. Raman Spectrum of Graphite. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bakheit, A.H.H.; Al-Hadiya, B.M.H.; Abd-Elgalil, A.A. Chapter One—Azithromycin. In Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology; Brittain, H.G., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; Volume 39, pp. 1–40. ISBN 9780128001738. [Google Scholar]
  71. Grimshow, J. Electrochemical Reactions and Mechanisms in Organic Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 276–281. [Google Scholar]
  72. Wang, H.; Zhang, A.; Cui, H.; Liu, D.; Liu, R. Adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of erythromycin at a pretreated glassy carbon electrode. Microchem. J. 2000, 64, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Montenez, J.P. Interaction of the macrolide azithromycin with phospholipids: II. Biophysical and computer-aided conformational studies. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 314, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Laviron, E. General expression of the linear potential sweep voltammogram in the case of diffusionless electrochemical systems. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1979, 101, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mahnashi, H.M.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Alkahtani, A.S.; El-Wekil, M.M. Simultaneous electrochemical detection of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine based on VS2 QDs embedded N, S @graphene aerogel/cCNTs 3D nanostructure. Microchem. J. 2021, 163, 105925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cheng, H.; Li, X.; Li, T.; Qin, D.; Tang, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, G. Electrospun Nanofibers with High Specific Surface Area to Prepare Modified Electrodes for Electrochemiluminescence Detection of Azithromycin. J. Nanomater. 2021, 2021, 9961663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 22 06181 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative SEM (a,b) and TEM (c) micrographs of the EGr sample; scale bar 30 µm (a); 3 µm (b); and 100 nm (c).
Figure 1. Representative SEM (a,b) and TEM (c) micrographs of the EGr sample; scale bar 30 µm (a); 3 µm (b); and 100 nm (c).
Sensors 22 06181 g001
Sensors 22 06181 g002 550
Figure 2. The XRD pattern of EGr sample dispersed in DMF and deposited onto a quartz substrate, showing the two peaks attributed to FLG and MLG; inset: the structural parameters determined from the XRD pattern: the mean size of graphene crystallite (D), the interlayer spacing (d), the average number of layers in graphene crystallites (n), and the amount (%) of FLG and MLG present within the sample.
Figure 2. The XRD pattern of EGr sample dispersed in DMF and deposited onto a quartz substrate, showing the two peaks attributed to FLG and MLG; inset: the structural parameters determined from the XRD pattern: the mean size of graphene crystallite (D), the interlayer spacing (d), the average number of layers in graphene crystallites (n), and the amount (%) of FLG and MLG present within the sample.
Sensors 22 06181 g002
Sensors 22 06181 g003 550
Figure 3. The FTIR spectrum of EGr sample embedded in KBr pellet.
Figure 3. The FTIR spectrum of EGr sample embedded in KBr pellet.
Sensors 22 06181 g003
Sensors 22 06181 g004 550
Figure 4. The Raman spectrum of EGr material.
Figure 4. The Raman spectrum of EGr material.
Sensors 22 06181 g004
Sensors 22 06181 g005 550
Figure 5. DPV signals recorded in supporting electrolyte of various pHs (3.6–7), each containing 10−5 M AZT; acetate buffer solutions (pH 3.6, 4.4, and 5) and phosphate buffer solutions (pH 6 and 7); inset: variation of peak current, Ip, with the solution pH.
Figure 5. DPV signals recorded in supporting electrolyte of various pHs (3.6–7), each containing 10−5 M AZT; acetate buffer solutions (pH 3.6, 4.4, and 5) and phosphate buffer solutions (pH 6 and 7); inset: variation of peak current, Ip, with the solution pH.
Sensors 22 06181 g005
Sensors 22 06181 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The chemical structure of azithromycin.
Scheme 1. The chemical structure of azithromycin.
Sensors 22 06181 sch001
Sensors 22 06181 g006 550
Figure 6. Dependence of peak potential, Ep, versus the natural logarithm of scan rate, lnυ (a); dependence of Ep versus the pH (b).
Figure 6. Dependence of peak potential, Ep, versus the natural logarithm of scan rate, lnυ (a); dependence of Ep versus the pH (b).
Sensors 22 06181 g006
Sensors 22 06181 g007 550
Figure 7. DPV signals recorded in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT: EGr/GC (red curve) and GC (blue); GC in pH 5 acetate (black curve).
Figure 7. DPV signals recorded in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT: EGr/GC (red curve) and GC (blue); GC in pH 5 acetate (black curve).
Sensors 22 06181 g007
Sensors 22 06181 g008 550
Figure 8. DPV recorded in supporting electrolyte of pH 5 containing various concentrations of AZT, from 10−6 to 6 × 10−5 M; inset: variation of peak current, Ip, with the solution concentration, C.
Figure 8. DPV recorded in supporting electrolyte of pH 5 containing various concentrations of AZT, from 10−6 to 6 × 10−5 M; inset: variation of peak current, Ip, with the solution concentration, C.
Sensors 22 06181 g008
Sensors 22 06181 g009a 550Sensors 22 06181 g009b 550
Figure 9. Amperometric curves recorded with EGr/GC (red) and GC (black) electrodes in supporting electrolyte of pH 5, after the addition of AZT from 10−4 M stock solution; the concentration range was from 10−8 to 10−5 M AZT; inset: the low concentration range, from 10−8 to 10−6 M (a); the corresponding calibration curves for EGr/GC (red) and GC (black) electrodes, using background subtracted signals (b).
Figure 9. Amperometric curves recorded with EGr/GC (red) and GC (black) electrodes in supporting electrolyte of pH 5, after the addition of AZT from 10−4 M stock solution; the concentration range was from 10−8 to 10−5 M AZT; inset: the low concentration range, from 10−8 to 10−6 M (a); the corresponding calibration curves for EGr/GC (red) and GC (black) electrodes, using background subtracted signals (b).
Sensors 22 06181 g009aSensors 22 06181 g009b
Sensors 22 06181 g010 550
Figure 10. DPV signals recorded with EGr/GC electrode in pH5 acetate containing a single analyte (10−5 M AZT; red curve) and a mixture of analytes (DA + UA + Tyr + AZT; 10−5 M each; blue curve); 10 mV/s scanning rate.
Figure 10. DPV signals recorded with EGr/GC electrode in pH5 acetate containing a single analyte (10−5 M AZT; red curve) and a mixture of analytes (DA + UA + Tyr + AZT; 10−5 M each; blue curve); 10 mV/s scanning rate.
Sensors 22 06181 g010
Sensors 22 06181 g011 550
Figure 11. Amperometric curve recorded with EGr/GC electrode in pH 5 acetate after the addition of AZT pharmaceutical drug solution (0.38 µL; 2.6 × 10−2 M) and three additions of 50 µL of AZT from 10−4 M stock solution (a); the standard addition plot obtained for AZT quantitative analysis (b).
Figure 11. Amperometric curve recorded with EGr/GC electrode in pH 5 acetate after the addition of AZT pharmaceutical drug solution (0.38 µL; 2.6 × 10−2 M) and three additions of 50 µL of AZT from 10−4 M stock solution (a); the standard addition plot obtained for AZT quantitative analysis (b).
Sensors 22 06181 g011
Sensors 22 06181 g012 550
Figure 12. Variation of Ip recorded with five different modified electrodes in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT.
Figure 12. Variation of Ip recorded with five different modified electrodes in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT.
Sensors 22 06181 g012
Sensors 22 06181 g013 550
Figure 13. Intra- (a) and interday (b) DPV response of EGr/GC-modified electrode recorded in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT.
Figure 13. Intra- (a) and interday (b) DPV response of EGr/GC-modified electrode recorded in pH 5 acetate containing 6 × 10−5 M AZT.
Sensors 22 06181 g013
Table
Table 1. The comparison between the electrochemical performance of EGr/GC electrode with those of other modified electrodes employed for the determination of AZT.
Table 1. The comparison between the electrochemical performance of EGr/GC electrode with those of other modified electrodes employed for the determination of AZT.
Electrode/Sensing MaterialTechniqueLinear Range (M)DL (M)Sensitivity (A/M)Ref.
VS2 QDs/cCNTs/N,DPV0.28–30 × 10−80.091 × 10−86.53[75]
MIP/GNU/GO/GCEDPV0.3–920 × 10−90.1 × 10−90.0378[39]
Gr/IL/GCEDPV6.54–38.1 × 10−72.53 × 10−7-[41]
Hg(Ag)FESWV
SW-AdSV		6.42–31 × 10−61.92 × 10−6-[40]
1.33–3.28 × 10−64 × 10−7-
CNFs-2/GCEECL8 × 10−8–10−46.52 × 10−8-[76]
GO-MWCNTs/GCELCV10−7–10−57 × 10−80.48[42]
EGr/GCAmperometry10−8–10−53.03 × 10−90.68This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pogăcean, F.; Varodi, C.; Măgeruşan, L.; Stefan-van Staden, R.-I.; Pruneanu, S. Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Azithromycin with Graphene-Modified Electrode. Sensors 2022, 22, 6181. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166181

AMA Style

Pogăcean F, Varodi C, Măgeruşan L, Stefan-van Staden R-I, Pruneanu S. Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Azithromycin with Graphene-Modified Electrode. Sensors. 2022; 22(16):6181. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pogăcean, Florina, Codruţa Varodi, Lidia Măgeruşan, Raluca-Ioana Stefan-van Staden, and Stela Pruneanu. 2022. "Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Azithromycin with Graphene-Modified Electrode" Sensors 22, no. 16: 6181. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop