Next Article in Journal
Automatic Placement of Visual Sensors in a Smart Space to Ensure Required PPM Level in Specified Regions of Interest
Next Article in Special Issue
Accurate Detection and Localization of Water Pipe Leaks through Model-Based TDR Inversion
Previous Article in Journal
An Effective Method to Model and Simulate the Behavior of Inductive Angle Encoders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultra-Wide Band Double-Slot Podal and Antipodal Vivaldi Antennas Feed by Compact Out-Of-Phase Power Divider Slot for Fluid Properties Determination
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Method for Extracting Debye Parameters as a Tool for Monitoring Watered and Contaminated Soils

Sensors 2022, 22(20), 7805; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22207805
by Andrea Cataldo 1, Iman Farhat 2, Lourdes Farrugia 2, Raffaele Persico 3,* and Raissa Schiavoni 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2022, 22(20), 7805; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22207805
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 10 October 2022 / Published: 14 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Dielectric Sensing-Based Systems and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors present a method for monitoring contaminated soils. The work deals with the detection of moisture and the presence of oil in sand. The work is of interest to environmental control.

However, the manuscript (and research) needs some improvements, in my opinion:

1. The use of Debye instead of a more "robust" model like Cole-Cole; since,  as presented widely in the literature, it is a better descriptor of this kind of complex media.

2. A description of temperature control lacks in the research. This is a critical issue when measuring the dielectric response of materials with water content.

 

Author Response

We thank the Reviewer for appreciating the work. Please check the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We thank the Reviewer for appreciating the work. Please check the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have satisfactorily addressed all my prior comments, and the manuscript now shows quality enough for consideration. I have only one last suggestion:

 

Considering the justification of the selection of brass as conductive material, in addition to the economic convenience the authors are suggested to include a brief discussion on the expected performance of the probe with other more conductive materials, such as copper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop