Next Article in Journal
A Distributed Sensor Network for the Control of a Bioclimatic House in Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Miniaturized pH Sensors Based on Zinc Oxide Nanotubes/Nanorods
Previous Article in Journal
Biomimetic Yeast Cell Typing—Application of QCMs
Previous Article in Special Issue
The pH Response and Sensing Mechanism of n-Type ZnO/Electrolyte Interfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Semiconducting Metal Oxide Based Sensors for Selective Gas Pollutant Detection

American University of Sharjah, Biology & Chemistry Department, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, UAE
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2009, 9(10), 8158-8196; https://doi.org/10.3390/s91008158
Submission received: 25 August 2009 / Revised: 9 September 2009 / Accepted: 10 September 2009 / Published: 16 October 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal-Oxide Based Nanosensors)

Abstract

:
A review of some papers published in the last fifty years that focus on the semiconducting metal oxide (SMO) based sensors for the selective and sensitive detection of various environmental pollutants is presented.

1. Background

Semiconducting metal oxide sensors are one of the most widely studied groups of chemiresistive gas sensors. These sensors are designed to react with one class of gases whereby the SMO undergoes reduction and oxidation. This process causes the SMO sensors to exchange electrons with the target gas at a certain characteristic rate, thereby affecting the sensor's resistance and yielding a certain signal. The reaction of SMO materials with gases and the result of the conductometric changes were introduced in the early 1950's by Brattein et al. [1] and Heiland [2]. The direct applications of the SMO sensors as catalysts and electric conductive detectors toward various gases were then introduced by Bielanski et al. [3] and Seiyama et al. [4].
During the past few decades, SMO gas sensors have become a prime technology in several domestic, commercial, and industrial gas sensing systems. Three different types of solid state gas sensors are widely available nowadays [5,6]. These sensors are based on electrochemical behavior, catalytic combustion, or resistance modulation of SMO [6-14]. Among the available gas sensing methods, the SMO gas sensor devices have several unique advantages such as low cost, small size, measurement simplicity, durability, ease of fabrication, and low detection limits (< ppm levels). In addition, most SMO based sensors tend to be long-lived and somewhat resistant to poisoning. For these reasons, they have rapidly grown in popularity, becoming the most widely used gas sensors available these days.
Several materials are fabricated to enhance the sensing characteristics of the SMO gas sensors. Various SMO mixed with different dopants, catalysts, adhesives, binders, volatile fillers, and electrodes all have been studied [15-46]. In addition to the variations in the composition of the SMO materials, their film deposition methods provide another variable for sensor design. These deposition methods include pyrolysis, oxidation of metallic films, reactive sputtering, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), laser ablation, and electron-beam evaporation techniques [47-60]. This review article will focus on the principle and use of SMO sensors for several applications, for gas detection, and environmental monitoring. The article will also discuss several environmental influence factors that might affect a SMO sensor's performance in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, and response time.

2. Working Principle of SMO Gas Sensors

Despite the simplicity of SMO measurements for use as gas sensors, the detection mechanism is complex and not yet fully understood. This complexity is due to the various parameters that affect the function of the solid state gas sensors. These include the adsorption ability, electrophysical and chemical properties, catalytic activity, thermodynamic stability, as well as the adsorption/desorption properties of the surface [5,61-69]. However, it is believed that gas sensing by SMO devices involve two major key functions as receptor and transducer functions [70,71]. The former involves the recognition of a target gas through a gas-solid interface which induces an electronic change of the oxide surface, while the latter is based on the transduction of the surface phenomenon into an electrical resistance change of the sensor [70]. When a sensor is heated to a high temperature in the absence of oxygen, free electrons easily flow through the grain boundaries of the SMO film. In an oxygen atmosphere, oxygen is adsorbed onto the SMO surface, forming a potential barrier at the grain boundaries. The interaction of atmospheric oxygen with the SMO surface forms charged oxygen species, which trap electrons from the bulk of the material. The layer of charged oxygen at the surface repels other electrons from interacting with the bulk of the film, creating a region depleted of electrons which results in an increased potential barrier at the grain boundaries. This impedes the flow of electrons and thus increases the resistance. When the sensor is exposed to an atmosphere containing a reducing gas, the SMO surface adsorbs the gas molecules and lowers the potential barrier, allowing the electrons to flow easily and thus reducing the electrical resistance. In this manner, the sensors act as variable resistors whose value is a function of gas concentration.
Metal oxides exhibit various electro-physical features, ranging from insulators to wide band-gap semiconductors [72-84]. The non-transition metal oxides contain elements with one oxidation state because they require a large amount of energy to make other oxidation states that would bind to the oxygen ion ligand [72]. In contrast, because of the various oxidation states that might form on transition metal oxides compared to non-transition metal oxides, the surface properties and the types of chemisorptions that occur on the surface are important and have been widely studied [72,73,75]. This variation in the oxidation states causes significant changes in the surface chemistry response toward oxygen and other target gaseous molecules [5]. Despite the fact that transition metals of dn oxides with n > 0 exhibit high potentials to perform oxidation and reduction processes, it has been noted that only transition metals with d0 configuration displayed real gas sensor application. For example, TiO2, V2O5, WO3 have d0 configurations and are the most widely used transition elements in sensor technology, along with non-transition elements with a d10 configuration like ZnO and SnO2 based materials. The above choice of metal oxides were found to have a filled valence band of predominantly oxygen 2p character with band gap ranges between 3–4 eV [77-84].
Since the mode of adsorption and/or reaction occur on a sensor's surface, several researchers have reported that the conductivity response is highly affected by the presence of an efficient catalyst that enhances the surface reactivity toward the target gaseous molecules [61,62,68,75,85-87]. In specifics, catalytic reactions involving surface oxygen can change both the surface potential along with its defect level and thus control the electro-physical properties of the nanocrystalline modified metal oxide. Therefore, tuning the surface characteristics with specific catalysts has resulted in major advances in sensor technology where both reactivity and selectivity in a material's responses were improved [88]. Both “spill over” and Fermi energy control mechanisms were applied to explain how catalysts affect the sensing strategy. In the “spill over” mechanism, the catalysts will dissociate the molecule and then the atoms will spill over the surface while in the Fermi energy mechanism the adsorbed oxygen will remove electrons from the catalyst and then the catalyst will effectively dislodge from the surface catalyst film.

3. Testing Setup, Film Deposition and Delivery System

Despite the fact that the testing setups of SMO sensors tend to differ, their overall principle remains the same. Figure 1 shows a general schematic of a SMO gas sensor device.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the sensor array mainly consists of a target gas, a multi-component gas mixer, a mass flow controller unit, a testing chamber, a power supplier and heaters, and an electrometer for resistance measurement. LabVIEW based software is mainly used to control all testing parameters and measurements during the experiment. The testing chamber consists of SMO sensor platforms with the ability to control and measure each sensor's temperature and resistance. The SMO films are deposited on the sensing element as thin or thick film substrates. Thin film deposits are made via ultra high vacuum (UHV) or electron beam evaporation techniques, while thick films are deposited using spin coating methods or via direct deposition of the corresponding SMO suspension. The sensor platform is bonded into a standard header and then placed in a test chamber and annealed at 400 °C using a temperature controller prior to gas exposure where the testing experiments of the SMO to the target gaseous molecules begin.

4. Applications in Environmental Monitoring and Gas Detection

4.1. Nitrogen oxide gases (NOx)

Different carbon nanotube (CNT) films produced by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique were tested as resistive NO2 sensors for environmental applications [89]. It was found that the CNT networks provide good response to low NO2 concentrations and excellent selectivity in the presence of interfering gases like NH3, H2, octane, and toluene. The pretreatment period, sensor response, and recovery times were all found to be temperature dependent. Moreover, the results suggest that CNT network sensitivity upon exposure to different gases can be conveniently tuned by suitably choosing the airbrushed CNT materials, and by simultaneously controlling both the CNT deposition rate and CNT transport properties. As a result, CNT films offer fascinating opportunities for their use as sensor materials [89].
The sensitivity of the CNT sensors was found to depend on the deposition methods. For example, using a pulsed laser ablation (PLA) method, where the graphite contains Ni and Co catalysts, the resistance of the CNT (single and multi walled CNTs) gas sensor decreased with an increase of ambient NO gas or NO2 gas concentration. It was also found that the temporal rate of change in the resistance was proportional to the concentration of the target gas and it can be useful for rapid estimation of the target gas concentration [90]. CNT films modified with SMO materials have been recently used to detect low concentrations of NOx gases at low temperature. For example, CNTs deposited with platinum or palladium nanoclusters (deposited via radio frequency plasma enhanced CVD) serve as very promising chemical nanosensors with high sensitivity, reversibility, and a very low limit of ppb detection of NO2 [91]. Moreover, it has been reported that CNTs mixed with hexagonal-WO3 composites were able to detect as low as 100 ppb of NO2, without having to heat the sensor substrates during operation. The detected concentration level is very close to the ambient air quality standard for nitrogen dioxide, which demonstrates the environmental applicability of the new gas sensors [92].
Tungsten oxide based materials have received a great deal of attention in the fabrication of SMO gas sensor devices. For example, several SMOs based on WO3 sensors [93-98] and WO3 modified with various metal composites [99-108] have been used for potential NOx sensors. The reactivity of WO3 based sensors was found to be highly dependent on the deposition process and testing protocol [93-98]. For instance, films of nanostructured WO3 with high surface roughness were obtained using a modified thermal evaporation technique [93]. It was found that the sensors exhibit high responses, selectivity and short response times that are enhanced by decreasing the working temperature down to a minimum of 100 °C. At this temperature, high sensitivity was reached for NO2 with a detection limit lower than 100 ppb that caused a high variation in the film electrical resistance. Furthermore, the low responses obtained towards high concentrations of NH3 (10 ppm) and CO (400 ppm) suggest promising selective properties [93].
Recently, Yang et al. reported various synthetic methods for preparing efficient WO3 sensing elements for high temperature potentiometric NOx sensors [98]. Methods include deposition on Yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) attached to two Pt and Pd wires (Sensor A), WO3 mixed with a-terpineol (Sensor B), a hydrogen peroxide/WO3 solution (sensor C), and WO3 deposition on YSZ followed by UV radiation and ozone treatment (Sensor D). The experimental results showed that the Pt electrode (Sensor A) had the lowest NOx signal compared to the other devices containing WO3 whereas, the WO3/YSZ sensing electrode fabricated by the UV-ozone treatment method (sensor D) had better mechanical stability, higher sensitivity, and better response/recovery times than devices fabricated from commercial WO3 powder [98]. Moreover, several studies have emphasized that grain size reduction in metal oxide films is one of the key factors that enhance sensitivity and improve the selectivity of these films towards different gases [94-97]. The sensitivity of the WO3 sensing films deposited with interruptions by radio frequency (r.f.) sputtering onto silicon micro-machined substrates were higher than that obtained for the WO3 thin films deposited with basic technology due to the decrease of grain size in the WO3 films [95,96]. The sensors also show good selectivity to reducing gases. So, the results obtained showed that a decrease in grain size of the WO3-based sensing layer results in an increased sensitivity and selectivity to oxidizing gases [95,96].
WO3-based mixed oxides have also been investigated for their sensing characteristics. Modified materials include WO3-Ti [99-101], WO3-Pd, Pt, or Au [102-106], WO3-In2O3 [107], and WO3-Bi2O3 [108] which were used to fabricate selective and sensitive NOx gas sensors. For instance, sensors prepared based on semiconducting thin films of Ti, W, and Mo mixed oxides showed that the thin films had good sensing performances and the sensors were able to detect concentrations below the limit for environmental monitoring (CO, NO2) and breath analyzers (ethanol) [101]. Also, the sensitivity and selectivity of the deposited W–Ti–O mixed oxides thin films prepared using different Ti/W targets sputtered using an r.f. magnetron sputtering plant depend on the number and thickness of the Ti/W multilayers [99,100].
It was shown that the sensitivity, the minimum level of NOx gas detection and the selectivity can be significantly improved by adding thin layers of noble metals such as palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), and gold (Au) on the surface of the WO3 thin films operating at low sensor temperatures [102-106]. For example, pure and Au-doped WO3 powders prepared by a colloidal chemical method showed response values for NOx that depend on the operating temperature and the sensor's decomposition. The maximum gas response of the 1.5 wt.% Au-doped WO3 sensor was obtained at 200 °C while the 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 wt.% Au-doped WO3 sensors gave the maximum gas response at 150 °C. Finally, physical vapor deposited Au-gates showed response to NO2 with positive flat-band-voltage shifts [107]. Response times were shorter than recovery times and were inversely related to gas concentration. At low NO2 concentrations, signal magnitude was limited by response time, whereas, at higher concentrations, the signal tended to saturate and the responses rapidly approached a steady state [107].
Platinum electrodes covered with Pt containing zeolite Y (PtY) and WO3 as the two electrode materials were examined [108]. Catalytic activity measurements and temperature programmed desorption showed that WO3 was almost inactive toward NOx equilibration and no chemisorbed NOx species was released from the WO3 surface. However, PtY had much higher activity towards NOx equilibration. Due to this difference, compact solid-state potentiometric sensors were fabricated using PtY/Pt as the reference and WO3 as the sensing electrode. The use of a PtY filter made it possible to measure total NOx in the sub-ppm level and the interferences from CO, propane, NH3, H2O and CO2 were minimized [108].
The role of Bi2O3 and indium additions to WO3 in the improvement of NO-sensitive properties of WO3 thick films, as well as the structure and gas-sensitive electrical properties of mixed WO3-Bi2O3 thick films were also examined [109,110]. It was found that the gas-sensitive properties of the WO3-Bi2O3 mixed thick films strongly depend on the Bi2O3 content. As the Bi2O3 content increases, the NO sensitivity of the WO3‐Bi2O3 thick films gradually deteriorates and eventually disappears. But, the WO3-Bi2O3 mixed thick films with Bi2O3 contents between 3–5 wt.% displayed a fairly good ability to detect NO in air in the range of 5–1,000 ppm at 350 °C [109]. Finally, indium-doped WO3 sensors were found to be more sensitive to NO2 when tested at 200 °C and more sensitive to CO when tested at 300 °C. The sensors showed the highest responsiveness to NO2 when the indium content was set at 3.0 wt. % [110]. Other studies have revealed that the gas sensors based on indium oxide nanowires and In2O3 thin films grown by the metal organic CVD technique showed good selectivity to NO2 with little interference from other gases [111-114].
Investigators have also studied other SMO films such as SnO2 [103,115-126], ZnO [127-134], Te-oxide [135,136], Mo [137], gold [107], Pt [108], copper [138], and indium oxides [111,112]. Tin oxide thin films deposited onto different substrates such as Pyrex glass, Corning 7059 glass, and fused quartz showed a resistance change in the presence of 500 ppm of NO2 toxic gas at a working temperature of 350 °C and a sensitivity threshold of about 5 ppm at the same temperature [139]. An example of the electrical response of sprayed tin oxide thin films toward various concentrations of NO2 gas measured at 350 °C is presented in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2, the device detects low concentration <10 ppm of NO2 with a clear gradual increase in the resistance as the concentration of the target gas increases [139].
In addition, the structural properties of polycrystalline Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) thin films were optimized in order to improve the stability of these nitrogen oxide detectors in the presence of high gas concentrations (1,000–2,000 ppm in air). It was found that ITO thin films exhibit high sensitivity toward NO2 and NO. Furthermore, they also exhibited good selectivity of these gases with respect to CO and CH4. It was also found that four zones for oxygen ion adsorption and desorption were able to be distinguished by a plot of conductivity activation energy vs. temperature which also established that nitrogen oxide desorption occurs at the same temperature (about 570 K) where O2 desorption is supposed to take place [115].
ZnO sputtered thin films which were integrated with micro-arrays and deposited on Si [127] and Al [128] substrates were studied. The electrical response of the films to changes in concentration of NO2 along with other gases like H2, Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG), H2S, CO were examined. ZnO films showed strong responses to even low concentrations of NO2 (1 ppm) and higher sensitivity at lower temperatures [127]. The gas sensing results on ZnO-Al films showed that the response increased with an increase in Al concentration up to 5 wt.% Al. It also showed that the response increased gradually with increasing NO2 concentration, and reached saturation at 100 ppm of NO2. At an operating temperature of 100 °C, the response towards lower NO2 concentrations is low irrespective of the Al concentration. While at 200 °C, the gas response was higher than that of 100 °C and reached saturation at around 150 ppm of NO2. At an operating temperature of 300 °C, the sensor was able to detect more than 150 ppm of NO2 [128].
Finally, TeO2 thin films were prepared by a reactive r.f. sputtering method and the NO2 gas sensing characteristics of these films were investigated [135,136]. The sensors were subjected to various concentrations of NO2 gas in the range of 1–120 ppm. The results showed the best sensitivity to NO2 at room temperature and the response decreased with an increase in working temperature. The response was found to be highest for films with a thickness of 300 nm, compared to those of 100 nm thickness. The response time was found to decrease with increasing gas concentration and it was about 6 min for 1 ppm to about 1.2 min for 120 ppm NO2 concentration. The recovery times, however, were longer than eight min for each gas concentration [135].

4.2. Sulfur dioxide detection

Sulfur dioxide is one of the typical air pollutants that must to be detected and then reduced in the environment by suitable methods. Many studies on the development of SO2 sensors have appeared, including liquid and solid electrolytes [140-146], as well as polymeric sensing films [147-153]. In contrast, only a few reports have been written on SMO sensing films for selective SO2 detection. Sensors based on SnO2 [154], SnO2 doped Pd [155], WO3 doped with various metals [156-158] and Vanadium oxide modified with TiO2 [158] were deposited and their sensing properties were measured and modified to reach a selective and sensitive detection level of SO2 gas. For example, Berger et al. [154] have reported the interaction mechanisms on the gas/sensor interface during the initial detection of sulfur dioxide were analyzed using results from the physico-chemical characterization of the SO2/SnO2 interaction. Surface acidity and the effects of SnO2 hydration were studied in order to show the effects of SO2 treatment. The results showed an increase in the density of the Lewis acidic sites after treating the samples with SO2. This increase was found to be dependent on temperature, with the highest value being obtained for a treatment temperature of 500 °C. This increase in density is assumed to be the reason for the sensor's increased sensitivity at high temperatures. It was also found that the irreversible formation of sulfate on the sensor surface is the cause of the irreversibility of the device's response after SO2 is first detected [154].
SnO2-based gas sensors containing 0.05, 0.1, 1, and 3 mol% Pd, as a catalytic additive, were fabricated using thick film technology and their response to CO gas was tested within a temperature range of 300 °C to 600 °C with either NO or SO2 being introduced as an interfering gas. The testing results showed that when SO2 was introduced, the response of the sensors toward CO increased up to a temperature of 450 °C after which it started to decrease when the temperature was raised to 500 °C, and further to 600 °C [155].
The potential of different WO3 based semiconductor metal oxides as SO2 sensors have been investigated [156-158]. Several attempts were made to improve the SO2 sensing properties of WO3 and SnO2 by the addition of a small amount of noble metals. Adding 1.0 wt.% of the metal to the WO3 powder was carried out by a conventional solution based method by employing HAuCl4·4H2O, AgNO3, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, H2PtCl6·6H2O, PdCl2 and RhCl3·3H2O Each sensor material was mixed with a small amount of water and the resulting paste was applied to the surface of an alumina tube which had a pair of Pt wires serving as electrodes. It was then preheated to 950 °C for 10 hours in air prior to sensitivity measurements [156]. After the synthesis of the sensors, the sensitivity of the sensors from 200–800 ppm SO2 was measured in a flow apparatus in the temperature range of 100–800 °C. According to the experimental results, all the semiconductor metal oxides exhibited complex temperature- and time-dependant response curves for SnO2. However, among the oxides tested, WO3 exhibited the highest SO2 sensitivity at 400 °C, accompanied by a resistance increase, but its resistance to SO2 decreased at temperatures higher than 500 °C. Among the metals added to improve the SO2 sensitivity of WO3, the addition of 1.0 wt.% Ag was most effective for improving the sensitivity at 450 °C but also resulted in a decrease in sensor resistance upon exposure to SO2. When it came to cross selectivity, it was found that the resistance of WO3 increased upon exposure to both NO and NO2, and the NO2 sensitivity was superior to NO as well as SO2. In the case of 1.0 wt.% Ag/WO3, the results were similar but the interference from NO and NO2 was found to be more significant [156].
Active layers of pure and Pt doped WO3 were deposited using r.f. magnetron sputtering on micro-hotplate substrates and then their sensing properties to sulfur compounds (SO2 and H2S) were also investigated [157]. An integrated sensor containing an array of four microsensor elements was fabricated using microelectronic fabrication technology. The results showed that the sensors have high and reversible responses to the presence of H2S and SO2 diluted in CO2, in the absence of oxygen. Pure WO3 sensors were very sensitive to H2S, but not so for SO2. However the doped sensors showed the opposite behavior [157].
Recently, Liang et al. have modified a compact tubular sensor based on NASICON (sodium super ionic conductor) and a V2O5-doped TiO2 sensing electrode for the detection of SO2 [146]. The NASICON material was prepared from ZrO(NO3)2, NaNO3, (NH4)2HPO4 and Si(C2H5O)4 by a sol‐gel process. Nanometer-sized titanium dioxide was also prepared by a sol-gel method with Ti(OC4H9)4 as a precursor, C2H5OH as a solvent, and CH3COOH as a chelating reagent. NASICON was used as the basic material in the sensor and V2O5-doped TiO2 for the sensing electrode. The proportions of V2O5 to TiO2 were 0, 2, 5, 10 and 20 wt%. The sensors were exposed to sample gases containing different concentrations of SO2, NO, NO2, CH4, CO, NH3 and CO2 and their responses were measured. The results showed that the best sensing properties toward SO2 were shown by the sensor which had a thick film of NASICON and 5 wt% V2O5-doped TiO2 electrode sintered at 600 °C. The detection response time for 1–50 ppm SO2 was about 25–10 seconds while the recovery time was about 30–40 seconds. The sensor also showed excellent selectivity to SO2 against disturbing gases, and the operating temperature of the sensor was 300 °C [146].

4.3. H2S detection

SMO based sensors to detect H2S gas have received more attention than SO2 gases due to its toxic effects on human health. The threshold limit for H2S is 10 ppm. With concentrations above 250 ppm, H2S has a major effect on the human body, causing death. Since H2S occurs naturally in crude petroleum, natural gas, volcanic gases, as well as hot springs; and is generated by several industrial activities like bacterial decomposition of organic waste, food processing, cooking ovens, kraft paper mills, and petroleum refineries, the in situ monitoring of H2S is very important, especially in the industrial sector.
In recent years, studies on H2S detection and monitoring using SMO sensors have increased. The following SMO based sensors were successfully modified to selectively detect H2S: WO3 and WO3-based materials [159-165], SnO2 [166-171], ZnO [172,173], copper oxide [170,174,175], platinum and palladium oxides [176,177], indium oxides [177,178], silver based materials [169,179,180], titanium oxide [181] and cadmium oxide sensors [182].
WO3 based SMO sensors have received great attention for H2S detection. For example, WO3 films made by a r.f. deposition method employed in gas sensing showed that as-deposited films were sub-stoichiometric with various O/W ratios. The interaction with H2S was studied at 475 K, where the sensitivity of the film to the H2S gas is highest. The gas sensor's change in conductivity is most likely caused by the formation of a steady-state concentration of surface oxygen vacancies when the sensor is exposed to a given partial pressure of H2S in air [160]. Moreover, the H2S response properties of the WO3 thin film sensors were studied both in dry and wet synthetic air with different levels of humidity [161]. It has been noted that sputtered WO3 thin-film sensors give a large variation between the H2S response properties of sensors in the same sensor array where some sensors were found to be sensitive to H2S in the ppb range without gold doping, but with a slight increase in the conductance of the sensors in humid environments which interfere to some extent with the H2S sensing [161].
Unlike WO3 thin films, tungsten oxide nanostructures exhibit better sensing characteristics to H2S in the concentration range of 1–1,000 ppm over the temperature range of 40–250 °C. The best results were obtained with the WO2.72 nanowires at 250 °C where the response was not affected significantly up to 60% relative humidity (RH) [163,165]. A typical gas sensing profile of the above device toward the H2S detection at various temperatures and concentrations is shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 3, the highest response was observed at 250 °C with a possible detection limit under similar conditions that could reach the ppb range (<1 ppm) [165].
Recent studies showed that the amount of the dopant influences the sensitivity and the optimum operating temperature [159,164]. Among various dopants of gold, platinum, or palladium, it was found that the spillover effect of Pt dopant is larger than the gold dopant. In specific, under 1 ppm H2S and at an operating temperature of 220 °C, the individual sensitivities of the Pt and the Au-Pt doped WO3 gas sensors are 23 and 5.5, respectively. The results show that the Pt doped WO3 gas sensor exhibits acceptable response and recovery times, as well as a high sensitivity toward H2S [159,164].
Sols of crystalline SnO2 with various crystallite grain sizes ranging between 6 and 16 nm were prepared by subjecting stannic acid gel to hydrothermal treatments under various conditions. Thin film sensor devices with different film thicknesses between 200 and 900 nm were fabricated to investigate sensing properties toward H2S gas. It was found that the sensor response to H2S was significantly enhanced with decreasing film thickness and with increasing grain size up to 16 nm. The response was surprisingly large, exceeding 104 at 150 °C, for the device deposited with a 200 nm hickness [166,167].
An Ag doped nanocrystalline SnO2 gas sensing material presents better sensitivity compared to pure SnO2, due to the distribution of Ag2O particles in grain boundaries of nanocrystalline SnO2 and the formation of p–n heterojunctions [168]. The H2S measurement results indicate that the developed of the H2S sensor's working temperature is about 70 °C, which is much less than commercially available sensors and recently developed SMO sensors [168]. Moreover, Cu-SnO2 composites show strong sensitivity toward H2S detection which reaches <10 ppm of H2S at a temperature of 100 °C [170,171]. Other sensors containing copper, iron, cadmium, and indium oxides were found to be selective toward H2S detection in ppm concentration levels [170,171,174-178,182]. Finally, both ZnO and tellerium oxide films were found to be highly sensitive to H2S gases at very low concentration levels [172,183]. For example, tellurium thin films prepared by thermal evaporation on alumina substrates at a temperature of 373 K were found to be sensitive towards 0.1 ppm of H2S at room temperature where hydrogen sulphide reduced the amount of adsorbed oxygen on the Te film surface leading to an increase in resistance [183]. Similarly, ZnO sensors fabricated from ZnO nanorods were found to be a suitable candidate for practical materials detecting low concentrations of H2S and C2H5OH where the sensors responded to 0.05 ppm H2S at room temperature [172].

4.4. NH3 and amine sensors

Detecting trace levels of ammonia is important since it is used extensively in many areas like food processing, fertilizers, chemical technology, medical diagnosis, and environmental protection. Some of the well known materials for ammonia sensors are WO3 [8,184], copper based materials [8,185], ZnO [186], SnO2 [187], iron oxide [188], Cr2O3 [189]. WO3 thin films were prepared via a sol-gel technique using WCl6 as a precursor and then tested for its sensing properties toward trimethylamine (TMA) gas at a low operating temperature of 70 °C. WO3 films were deposited between interdigital gold electrodes on the outer wall of a ceramic tube. The gas sensitivities to TMA, C2H5OH gas, gasoline, CH4, CO, and water vapor were measured. The sensitivity of the sensor was carried out in a range of temperatures and different TMA concentrations. For 100 and 500 ppm of TMA, the optimum operating temperature was found to be 70 °C. Even for 700 and 1,000 ppm concentrations of TMA, the sensitivity is highest at 70 °C [184].
Pure ZnO and RuO2-doped ZnO were prepared by a screen printing technique on an alumina substrate in a desired pattern and their gas sensing performances were studied. The thick film samples were made by dipping pure ZnO thick films into an aqueous solution (0.01 M) of ruthenium chloride for different time intervals: 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes [186]. The responses to 1,000 ppm NH3 of pure ZnO sensors fired at 500–700 °C were measured at operating temperatures between 100–350 °C. The response value increased with increasing operating temperature, and the sensor fired at 650 °C was the most sensitive. Variations in gas response to 1,000 ppm NH3 of ZnO films doped with different amounts of RuO2 and different operating temperatures were also measured [186]. In addition, ZnO thin films activated by chromic acid dipped for different time intervals and then fired at 500 °C for 24 hours in ambient air where CrO3 is not thermally stable above 197 °C and thus oxygen was lost, forming Cr2O3 which is a stable compound [189].
Cr2O3-activated sensors showed a good response to NH3 even at room temperature and were highly selective towards NH3 gas (300 ppm) even in the presence of other toxic gases of higher concentrations. The sensor also showed very rapid response and recovery times to NH3 gas [189]. In contrast, Cr2O3 thick films modified by 0.59 mass % Fe2O3 proved to be the most sensitive to not only NH3 gas but also LPG, C2H5OH and Cl2 gases [188]. The operating temperatures for NH3, C2H5OH, LPG, and Cl2 were found to be 250 °C, 300 °C, 400 °C, and 450 °C, respectively. It showed good selectivity to a particular gas at a particular temperature against other reducing gases. The sensor also showed very rapid response and recovery rates to reducing gases [188].
Gas sensitive sol-gel SiO2-SnOx-AgOy films were fabricated where silver nitrate (AgNO3), 0.01 l.%, was added to tetraethoxysilane [(C2H5O)4Si] solutions mixed with stannic chloride (SnCl4·H2O), in a 5:1 ratio, in order to prepare an alcohol precursor. The 150-nm thick films were deposited by spin-coating on a silicon substrate. These obtained films were dried at 120 °C for 2 hours and then annealed at higher temperatures (from 350–600 °C) in air. The gas-sensitive properties of the films were tested to NH3 inputs which varied in the concentration range of 10–250 ppm in air. The films were shown to consist of Ag2O3, Ag4SiO4, Ag2SiO3, SnO, Sn3O4 and SnO2. It was confirmed that the response and recovery times depend on the Sn/Ag ratio. Further, an AFM study showed that the only films which were porous had a minimum Sn to Ag ratio of 0.5 and were annealed at 600 °C for eight hours, thus showing the best sensing characteristics. The films also showed good sensitivity to ammonia gas even at low temperatures (>50 °C) [190].
Finally, a different preparation technique for copper (I) bromide and their effects on its properties were investigated [185]. The two different techniques of preparation used were (1) magnetron sputtering (sensor A) and (2) electrochemical (sensor B1) or chemical (sensor B2) oxidation of copper in the presence of bromide ions. The detection of ammonia on CuBr sensors can be described as a two-step mechanism, involving the formation of a chemisorption layer during the ammonia treatment and dipolar effects due to physisorbed ammonia molecules during ammonia detection. All these results confirm that CuBr based sensors are of great interest for ammonia detection [185].

4.5. Hydrogen sensors

Hydrogen is a promising potential alternative fuel for automobiles and can be converted into electricity in fuel cells. It also is already used in medicine and space exploration as well as in the production of industrial chemicals and food products. Hydrogen sensors are needed because an explosive mixture can form if hydrogen leaks into air from storage tanks or valves. A nanostructured SnO2 thin film was fabricated by a spin coating together with a subsequent calcination process. Silver (Ag) and platinum (Pt) have been added as doping material in SnO2 to achieve better sensitivity and selectivity for H2 detection. The results of the tests showed that nanocrystalline SnO2 sensing films produced a fast response time of about two seconds and a quick recovery time of about 10 seconds with good sensitivity to hydrogen at 100 °C [191]. Porous SnO2 particles made using a Sol-gel method had higher sensitivity to H2 gas because of their high surface area [192]. A linear relationship between sensitivity and H2 concentration was observed on all sensors at an H2 concentration lower than 1,500 ppm. The results imply that there are potential applications for these high surface area SnO2 porous materials as highly sensitive sensors for the measurement of reducing gases at very low concentrations [192]. Moreover, a single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) reinforced nanocrystalline tin dioxide gas sensor was developed to achieve better gas sensing performance, in terms of sensitivity, response and recovery times, as well as a reduction in power consumption (low working temperature). Both the pure nano SnO2 sensor and the SWCNT/SnO2 sensor were tested in detecting various hydrogen concentrations [193]. The results showed that the SWCNT/SnO2 sensor's sensitivity for hydrogen detection was three times greater when compared to that of the pure SnO2 sensor over a hydrogen concentration range from 300 ppm to 1,500 ppm tested at a temperature of 250 °C [193].
Tungsten oxides supporting palladium or platinum catalysts were used as hydrogen-sensitive media. Their colors changed from pale green to blue when hydrogen reduces them to tungsten bronze [194]. Two different coatings of the WO3 were developed. In the first method, palladium-supported tungsten oxide powder was dispersed by dissolving tungsten oxide into a PdCl2 solution followed by annealing at 300 °C for 3 hours in air. The second sensor was developed using a Sol-Gel protocol in which, tungsten oxide sols are formed from the sodium tungstate aqueous solutions of various concentrations containing hydrogen tetrachloropalladate (II) acid (or chloroplatinic acid). The solution is acidified when it passes through a proton exchange resin [194]. The response time was greatly improved when the thin hydrogen-sensitive film was prepared by the sol–gel process where the sensor can measure the distribution along the fiber line, unlike the traditional hydrogen sensors that measure at a certain spatial point [194].

4.6. Ozone sensors

Ozone is one of the naturally occurring gases available in the atmosphere. However, a high level of ozone gas in the atmosphere is harmful to humans' respiratory system, causing inflammation and congestion of the respiratory tract [195]. This harmful level can result from the interaction between sunlight and various chemicals emitted into the environment by industrial means. Therefore, several materials based on WO3 [196-203] and SnO2 [204,205] have been fabricated to detect the ozone level in the atmosphere.
Novel sensors based on tungsten trioxide (WO3) semiconductors have been found to hold much promise as a cheaper alternative for ozone monitoring. For example, WO3 thin films deposited by reactive magnetron r.f. sputtering into silicon substrates have been investigated for ozone detection [196,197,200,202]. A clear enhancement of the sensor response to ozone was noticed when the grain size of the WO3 film decreases [202]. Recent studies have reported that the sensitivity of WO3 sensors strongly depends on working temperature, where at 573 K the sensor responses are the greatest [206]. The electrical properties of WO3 sputtered films depend upon the oxygen concentration during the deposition and during the resistivity versus temperature measurements. The activation energies are 0.19, 0.28 and 0.42 eV in the range of 300–723 K which indicates that the conduction mechanisms depend on oxygen concentration [196]. Further study on similar materials indicates that the adsorption efficiency in a mixture of air/ozone is strongly dependent on temperature as well [197]. Thus, the variation of the sensor's sensitivity with temperature is directly linked to the temperature dependence of the adsorption efficiency and the film morphology which strongly depends on the oxygen concentration during the deposition process [200].
WO3 based mixed oxide materials have also been investigated for ozone monitoring [199,201,203]. For example, the performances of three sensing layers — bare WO3, palladium, and gold activated surface WO3 — towards ethanol (C2H6O) and ozone (O3) were compared. Au has been found to be a good sensing activator for WO3 thin films. The sensitivities of Au/WO3 sensors to ethanol and ozone are in the 2/1 ratio; therefore, at 300 °C they can provide a stable, sensitive element for ethanol gas [199]. On the contrary, Pd/WO3 sensors are practically insensitive in this temperature range to the tested gases and could be used as selective elements against ozone [199]. Moreover, a small quantity of cobalt nanograins deposited on the surface of WO3 sensors produces a significant change in its conductance from n to p-type [203]. An increase in conductance of the WO3 sensors under ozone is thus observed.
Modified Co/W sensors have been tested under ozone before and after an annealing process under dry air at a temperature of 673 K for 1.5 hours [203]. The obtained response shape and mechanisms of ozone detection by Co/WO3 sensors suggest complex phenomena which depend on the strength of the metal substrate interaction and consequently could be induced by the formation of oxide species on the metal nanoparticles. To understand the changes that occur upon ozone exposure, a dynamic model based on the Wolkenstein adsorption theory has been developed [201]. The model suggested that the ozone detection mechanism of WO3-based gas sensors in dry air is essentially due to the adsorption of species O2, O2, O and O at the surface of the grains. Both the simulation results and the experimental ones show good correlations [201].
A computerized Modular Ozone Sensor System (MOSS) based on various metal oxides (In2O3, SnO2) has been presented for evaluating the sensitivity and reliability of different sensor/transducer combinations. A material's sensitivity to ozone and its cross-sensitivity to other gases in ambient condition and to humidity were evaluated. It has been discovered that indium based materials had the largest sensor sensitivity as well as the smallest cross-sensitivities for ozone detection [204]. SnO2 films with a thickness of 30–200 nm deposited by spray pyrolysis shows a response to ozone that is quantitative and rapid and sufficient for use in ozone control and monitoring applications [205]. Sensor performance showed a large change in resistance upon exposure to ozone with maximum values for relative signals observed at an operating temperature ranges between 200–350 °C, (Rozone /Rair), in the range of 102–104 for ozone concentrations of ∼1 ppm in air at 35%–45% relative humidity (RH) [205].

4.7. Volatile organic compound sensors

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are very dangerous for both the environment and human beings. For humans, these compounds can cause many acute or chronic problems like eye irritation, throat and lung problems, as well as cancer. Therefore, during the past decade, several studies have been reported on modifying thin and thick film SMO sensors for atmospheric gaseous pollutants like VOCs. Several sensors have been fabricated during the last decade to selectively detect various VOC components like ethanol, acetone, hydrocarbon, and LPG. Some of these SMO sensors contain single metal or mixed metal oxides like SnO2 and SnO2-based materials [207-220], WO3 and WO3-based materials [221-224], titanium based oxides [225-227], zinc based oxides [214,224,228], iron based oxides [229,230], cobalt based oxides [231], cerium oxide sensor [232], and copper based materials [233].
When comparing the sensitivity of the SnO2 films, the ethanol gas sensitivity can be increased tremendously with an addition of a basic metal oxide such as La2O3 to SnO2. Ethanol gas undergoes dehydrogenation and dehydration over the SnO2-based elements loaded with a basic oxide (e.g., La2O3) and an acidic oxide (e.g., WO3), respectively [208]. As a result, SnO2 coated with a La2O3 layer using a 0.5 M La (NO3)3 aqueous solution showed an increase in response to acetone (∼3.6 times) and ethanol (∼5.5 times) with no variations in the responses toward propanol, CO, and H2 gases [211]. Moreover, tin oxide films doped with 2.0 wt.% CeO2 were found to dramatically improve sensitivity and selectivity to C2H5OH, in the presence of CO, LPG and CH4. The results show that ethanol selectivity is enhanced by factors of about 5.2, 5.3, and 48.2 with respect to CO, methane, and LPG, respectively. The enhancement in ethanol selectivity strongly depends on the temperature where the maximum selectivity is observed at 300 °C. At higher temperatures, its selectivity to ethanol sharply declines and the sensor becomes more selective to CO in the presence of ethanol and LPG [220].
Recently, the effect of CdO doping on the gas-sensing properties of SnO2-based sensors has been reported. Doping with CdO causes a remarkable improvement in sensitivities of SnO2 to C2H5OH and H2 with best sensitivity observed at 300 °C for the 10 mol% Cd-doped SnO2 film. The detection limit of this deposit is up to several ppm C2H5OH in air, making it applicable as a breath alcohol analyzer [210].
It has been noted that the mode of deposition of thin tin based oxide films highly influenced their physical, electrical, and chemical properties [207,209,212-214,234]. For example, SnO2–In2O3 nanocomposites fabricated with a coprecipitation method achieved superb response to ethanol by tuning the content of indium [209]. In addition, sensors prepared by mixing the SnO2 paste with a Pt paste before firing, showed sensitivity to ethanol that was five times higher than one of the sensors prepared by a r.f. magnetron sputtering method. The 3% Pt-doped samples have an extremely high sensitivity to ethanol vapors and their responses are linear in the ppb range with a detection limit below 1 ppb at an operation temperature of 300 °C [212].
Finally, several tin oxide based films have been modified to detect other VOCs like vapors of LPG, acetylene, and aldehyde with high sensitivity and selectivity. A SnO2–NiO composite material provides a stable and sensitive film for detecting low concentrations of HCHO [215]. Despite the fact that the response and recovery time of the film sensor decreases rapidly with an increase in the HCHO concentration; at relatively low concentrations, the micro-gas sensor can detect 0.06 ppm HCHO and shows high selectivity in the presence of interference gases, such as acetone, alcohol, -pinene and toluene, which makes it promising for the detection of indoor HCHO [215]. Qi et al. have reported that 6 wt% Sm2O3-doped SnO2 displays a superior response for C2H2 that is 16.8 times larger than that of pure SnO2 at an operating temperature of 180 °C. This sensor also shows high sensitivity under various humid conditions which make it a good candidate for fabricating C2H2 sensors [216]. SnO2 based sensors have been modified to detect LPG [217,219]. For example, it has been reported that SnO2 sputtered with Pt, Ag, Ni, and Pb using a r.f. technique show good detection toward LPGs. Among all of these devices, the SnO2–Pt-dotted island structure exhibits enhanced the response for LPG at a relatively low operating temperature of 260 °C. The presence of Pt islands on the SnO2 film results in enhanced sensing characteristics with a fast response speed (about 100 s) and a fast recovery time (about 120 s) [217]. Moreover, the gas sensitivity of the SnO2 gas sensor toward LPG was improved by Al doping, which is further improved by Ni doping due to a significant reduction in the grain size of the composite material [219].
TiO2 and W/TiO2 thin films with increasing W content deposited via a spin-coating method presented high ethanol sensing performances [222]. Doping with W resulted in an increased response with respect to pure TiO2 where, spin-coated W/TiO2 thin films showed a very high ethanol response compared with those already presented for TiO2 [235]. In addition, Nb-Pt co-doped TiO2 and the hybrid single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs)/Nb-Pt co-doped TiO2 thin films prepared by the sol-gel spin-coating process have been tested for ethanol detection [225]. The results revealed that the responses to ethanol of the Nb–Pt co-doped TiO2 sensors with SWCNTs inclusion increase by factors of 2–5 depending on the operating temperature and the ethanol concentration, compared to that of the sensor without SWCNT inclusion with a maximum sensitivity and stability at 335 °C [225].
WO3 thick films prepared by a screen-printing method exhibited excellent acetone vapor sensing properties with a maximum sensitivity reached at 300°C along with fast response and recovery times. Further, the screen printed WO3 thick films can be reliably used to monitor the concentration of acetone vapor over the concentration range of 25–75 ppm [223]. The response and recovery characteristics of the WO3 thick films are reproducible and quick. Thus, this study demonstrates the possibility of utilizing WO3 thick films as a sensor element for the detection of acetone vapor [223]. Interestingly, Cr2−xTixO3 (x = 0–0.5, CTO) powders prepared by a combustion technique [227] showed a linear increase in the sensor response to acetone as a function of concentration. The quick response and recovery of these materials indicate their potential as excellent candidates for acetone monitoring. The exponential decay of the sensor relative response comes to a constant value after 80 hours of exposure to 1 ppm of acetone which indicates that the sensor could operate for several hundred hours with outstanding performance and continuous usage [227].
A nanosized ZnO powder was synthesized by using a chemical precipitation method, and loaded with different dopants (Ru, Mg, Pd,Y, La,V, and Na) through impregnation. The prepared ZnO powder shows excellent gas responses to alcohol and acetaldehyde with no response to ethene. In addition, among all the dopants, Ru is the optimal dopant that can increase the sensor's response to C2H5OH [228]. Various metal oxides were modified by doping with lanthanum have been reported as selective VOC sensors. For example, the perovskite-type nano-crystalline thin-film of LaFeO3 obtained by using a sol-gel coating technique proved to be a good ethanol sensor that could be used as a detector for a wide range of C2H5OH concentrations between 100–1,000 ppm with excellent stability [229].
Nominal La1−xMgxFeO3 (x = 0 – 0.7) nano-powders were prepared using a sol–gel method. It has been noted that for samples La1−xMgxFeO3, the Mg composition x affects the structure, resistance in air, and gas sensing properties to methane gas. The resistance of La1−xMgxFeO3 is smaller than that of LaFeO3 with x ≤ 0.1. The La0.9Mg0.1FeO3-based sensor shows a high response to methane gas, low operating temperature, and excellent stability in air [230]. However, in the presence of interfering gases like methanol and CO, the sensor lacks selectivity. Recently, LaCoO3 perovskite has been modified as an active filter for eliminating the sensor's sensitivity to CO and ethanol [231]. Both CO and ethanol are completely removed by the filter at temperatures as low as 190 °C. At 250 °C, the sensor's sensitivity to ethanol dramatically decreased from 158 to 0.44 and that to CO declined from 2.2 to 0.9, when an active filter is used. Therefore, only methane reaches the Pt/SnO2 sensor at temperatures higher than 190 °C, for which the sensor shows high sensitivity to methane. As a result, the LaCoO3 perovskite filter eliminates the sensor sensitivity to CO and ethanol, making the sensor highly selective to methane in the presence of CO and ethanol in air [231].

4.8. Chemical warfare agents

The identification and quantification of chemical warfare agents (CWAs) in the battlefield and public areas is extremely important to eliminate the threat of these chemicals to humans. Various spectroscopic techniques have been employed to detect CWAs such as NMR [236-246], Mass Spectrometry [247-251], Gas Chromatography-Mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) [252], Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometry [253-257], Raman spectroscopy [258,259], Atomic emission and Flame photometry [260], Ion mobility spectrometry [261-266], and Fourier Transform microwaves [267]. However, the high cost and complexity of the sampling and detection procedures make it extremely important to develop devices that will provide real time, sensitive, and selective CWA detection with low cost. Several studies have shown that surface acoustic wave polymers provide highly selective sensors for CWA detection [268-278] but they still lack sensitivity. For the last three decades, semiconducting metal oxides (SMOs) such as SnO2, WO3, and ZnO have been extensively studied for sensing hydrocarbon and other chemical agents. The major problem with SMO sensor technology is that it lacks selectivity. Therefore, various semiconducting metal oxides such as In2O3, TiO2, WO3, CuO have been developed for enhancing selectivity to a particular analyte.
Tin oxide based gas sensors have been used to detect the toxic gases and chemical agent simulants [9,15,279-284]. For example, tin oxide nanowires prepared by a vapor-liquid-solid deposition method was found to be very sensitive to acetonitrile and dimethyl methyl phosphonate, DMMP, the most commonly used simulant molecule for sarin. The modified materials were found to be useful to detect concentrations of both simulant CWAs at concentrations lower than the respective CWAs Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) values [279]. Lee et al. [281] have previously reported that the particle and the pore size, as well as the doping of the sensing materials play significant roles in the sensitivity of the SMO particles [281]. In specific, during the detection of acetonitrile and dichloromethane on tin oxide thick film sensors, the sensor prepared from a small SnO2 precipitated particle (15 nm) was more sensitive than that prepared from the commercial SnO2 (40 nm) with a significant enhancement in the sensor's sensitivity upon doping with NiO or Nb2O5. The sensitivity of the SnO2 sensor linearly increased in acetonitrile between 0.02 and 0.2 ppm at 350 °C whereas, for other chemical agent simulants, the sensitivity increased linearly between 0.1 and 0.8 ppm [281]. The recovery of the sensors seemed to be possible for acetonitrile whereas, in the cases of DMMP and dichloromethane, the complete recovery of the sensor was not possible because of poisoning. However, addition of Sb2O3 or MoO3 dopants enhanced the recovery of the sensors after the exposure of DMMP or dichloromethane [281]. The same research group has recently reported that three components; namely, Mo, Sb, and Ni (Mo5Sb1·Ni(I)) promoted the SnO2 based sensors for the detection of DMMP [280]. In specific, the Mo5Sb1·Ni(I) sensor showed not only an excellent sensor response in the detection of a very low concentration of DMMP (ppb level), but also a complete recovery. Also, the Mo5Sb1·Ni2(I) sensor developed in this study showed a high sensor response of about 70% in the detection of 0.5 ppm DMMP at 350 °C [280]. Finally, it has been reported that adding basic oxides like CaO and MgO to SnO2 or ZnO-based elements exhibit a reasonable sensitivity to DMMP down to 44 ppb. The role of basic oxide additives aids the dissociative adsorption of DMMP on the oxide surface, thus facilitating the oxidation reaction of the test gas [282].
Nano-sized high surface area WO3 powders have shown high sensitivity toward CWA detection, especially the DMMP simulant molecule [285-291]. It has been noted that DMMP adsorbs on the high surface area TiO2 and WO3 powders through hydrogen bonding of the P=O functional group to the hydroxyl groups of the metal oxide surface. At higher reaction temperatures, these hydrogen bonded organophosphorous compounds dissociate and form covalently attached species. Above 200 °C, the methoxy groups desorb from the surface while the methyl groups remain stable. Above 300 °C, a stable phosphate surface complex is formed and causes poisoning effects observed during DMMP gas exposure of chemiresistive sensors operating in this temperature range [291]. Moreover, a WO3 based chemiresistive sensor has been designed and tested for chlorine detection with high sensitivity (as low as 0.05 ppm) and a short response time (< 1 minute) [290]. The modified sensor is small, portable, inexpensive, and may have applications as an element in a chemical warfare sensing array [290].
Besides developing new semiconducting metal oxides, compositions of binary or polynary SMOs have been optimized for improved selectivity of target analytes. For example, Quan reported that trinary composition of SnO2-In2O3-TiO2 with some trace dopants (Pd, Al, Si, etc.) enhanced the selectivity toward combustion-type CH4 gas at high concentration (≥500 ppm) [292]. More recently, SMO hybrid materials with non-conducting inorganic oxides as well as SMO surface modification by noble/transition metals or metal oxides have been widely reported for enhancing sensitivity and selectivity toward the target chemical agents. For example, surface-modified tin oxide by ruthenium and palladium oxides has improved sensitivity to hydrogen at high concentration (1,000 ppm) [293,294], tin oxide modified by ruthenium or surface-ruthenated tin oxide has improved selectivity to hydrocarbon at high concentration (1,000 ppm) [295], tin oxide modified by CuO has high selectivity to H2S at 200 °C [296], surface-modified indium oxide by Rb2CO3 gives a surprisingly selective detection of CO [297], CaO or MgO surface-modified tin oxides exhibit promising sensing properties to dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) [282]. Therefore, the modified SMO sensors can selectively detect target analytes at high concentration, but at low concentration (<10 ppm), SMO sensors may lack selectivity for practical CWA applications.
Recently, several studies have focused on providing sensitive and selective CWA detection. Methods including a combination of filtration, concentration, and array based detection have been reported [287,298-301]. Materials such as inorganic membranes, zeolites, and other adsorbents are used to selectively preconcentrate and prefilter interferent molecules from the gas stream [299-304]. An array-based approach increases the information content of the response signal because each element of the array produces a different response characteristic to the gas matrix. In this case, a bank of sensors is used in which each sensor element produces a different response to the various components of the gas stream [13,14]. Variables such as metal oxide composition and morphology, impregnation with metal catalysts and operational temperature are a few approaches that are under investigation to achieve distinguishable sensor array elements [305-310]. For example, thick films of various SMO components prepared via drop-coating techniques followed by annealing using an internal heater in the sensor platform have been studied on various real CWAs, CWA simulants, as well as interfering gaseous molecules [13]. The study showed that nano-sized materials based on WO3, SnO2, and In2O3 can detect low levels of CWAs in the ppb range within a short time. For example, Figure 4 depicts an example of the SnO2 and WO3 thick film sensors for CWA detection at 400 °C. In addition, using significant differences occur during either the physical or the chemical adsorption processes on the SMO films, one can discriminate between various gases on the same sensor platform by applying suitable pattern recognition techniques like linear discriminant analysis (LDA) or principal component analysis (PCA) [13,14]. As shown in Figure 4 (right graphs) the WO3 based device, has the potential to discriminate between various gases based on variations in molecular structure that affect the target-surface reaction protocols and thus lead to differences in the response shape [13].
A simpler and direct protocol has been recently reported by Kanan et al. to selectively discriminate DMMP from a gas stream [285,286]. The method established a unique selective and size sensitive sensor array for CWA detection using dual a sensor configuration that is coated with porous and nonporous WO3 nano-material. By comparing the sensor response on a porous WO3 powder (samples B and C) to the response on a nonporous WO3 powder sensor (sample A), detection selectivity between methanol and DMMP was obtained because the access of a gas molecule in the interior pore structure of WO3 is size dependent; thus leading to a size dependant magnitude change in the resistance of the SMO sensor. Several responses have been recorded for methanol and DMMP along with a series of alcohols of different shapes and sizes in order to demonstrate the size selective detection [285]. Figure 5 shows a typical sensor response to three consecutive gas pulses of methanol, t-butanol, and DMMP on porous and nonporous based sensors [285]. As shown in Figure 5, the response of the porous sensor to DMMP is weaker than the response of the nonporous based sensor for the same target gas (DMMP). In contrast, the responses of both sensors toward methanol look similar because methanol has a small size so it can access the pore of the porous material [285].
The change in conductivity (ΔC) obtained on each porous WO3 sensor is then ratioed to the corresponding ΔC obtained on the nonporous WO3 sensor (ΔCporous/ΔCnonporous) which provided a clear distinction between methanol and DMMP, which is larger in size compared to methanol [285].

5. Concluding Remarks

As discussed in this review, in our opinion, there are several important and potentially existing sensor arrays for selective and sensitive detection for each of the studied toxic pollutants. Therefore, such systems can have a major impact on human health and safety for domestic use as well as, various industrial and homeland security. Below is a summary of distinguished SMO based sensors for specific pollutant detection:
  • Carbon nanotubes modified with SMO materials like WO3 composites can detect ppb concentration levels of nitrogen oxide (NO or NO2) gases at room temperature [90,91].
  • Tin oxide thin films as well as tin oxide and tungsten oxide doped with noble metals like platinum and gold provide sensitive SO2 detection but these devices operate at temperatures above 350 °C [139,156,157].
  • A tin oxide thin film with 200 nm thickness was found to be a highly sensitive sensor toward H2S at 150 °C [166,167]
  • A Cr2O3-based sensor provided sensitive and selective detection for gaseous ammonia at room temperature [189].
  • SnO2 doped silver or platinum provided a unique sensor for H2 detection [192].
  • WO3 films represent good devices for ozone detection where the films thickness, grain size, and operating temperatures have to bse adjusted to reach an optimal response [202,206].
  • SnO2 doped with basic oxides like La2O3 and CdO provide a unique response toward alcohol in air making it applicable as alcohol breath detectors [210].
  • Several SMO based materials have been used to detect sarin-like stimulants (DMMP) in ppb concentration levels but limitations like recovery and selectivity still need to be resolved. Several methods were applied to enhance selectivity including filteration, size selective detection, as well as pattern recognition techniques [13,280,285,293, 300,304].

References

  1. Brattain, W.H.; Bardeen, J. Surface properties of germanium. Bell. Syst. Tec. J. 1953, 1, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  2. Heiland, G. Zum Einfluss von Wasserstoff auf die elektrische leitfähigkeit von ZnO-kristallen. Zeit. Phys. 1954, 138, 459–464. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bielanski, A.; Deren, J.; Haber, J. Electric conductivity and catalytic activity of semiconducting oxide catalysts. Nature 1957, 179, 668–669. [Google Scholar]
  4. Seiyama, T.; Kato, A.; Fujiishi, K.; Nagatani, M. A new detector for gaseous components using semiconductive thin films. Anal. Chem. 1962, 34, 1502f. [Google Scholar]
  5. Korotcenkov, G. Metal oxides for solid-state gas sensors: What determine our choice? Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2007, 139, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Moseley, P.T. Solid state gas sensors. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 223–237. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sekimoto, S.; Nakagawa, H.; Okazaki, S.; Fukuda, K; Asakura, S.; Shigemori, T.; Takahashi, S.A. Fibre–optic evanescent-wave hydrogen gas sensor using palladium-supported tungsten oxide. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 66, 142–145. [Google Scholar]
  8. Morazzoni, F.; Scotti, R.; Origoni, L.; D'Arienzo, M; Jimenez, I.; Cornet, A.; Morante, J.R. Mechanism of NH3 interaction with transition metal-added nanosized WO3 for gas sensing: In situ electron paramagnetic resonance study. Catal. Today 2006, 126, 169–176. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, I.J.; Han, S.D; Han, C.H.; Gwak, J.; Hong, D.U.; Jakhar, D; Singh, K.C.; Wang, J.S. Development of micro hydrogen gas sensor with SnO2–Ag2O–PtOx composite using MEMS process. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 127, 441–446. [Google Scholar]
  10. Albert, K.J.; Lewis, N.S.; Schauer, C.L.; Sotzing, G.A.; Stilzel, S.E.; Vaid, T.P.; Walt, D.R. Cross-reactive chemical sensor arrays. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2595–2626. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shimizu, Y.; Egashira, M. Basic aspects and challenges of semiconductor gas sensors. MRS Bull. 1999, 24, 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  12. Martinelli, G.; Carotta, M.C.; Traversa, E.; Ghiotti, G. Thick-film gas sensors based on nano-sized semiconducting oxide powders. MRS Bull. 1999, 24, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tomchenko, A.; Harmer, G.P.; Marquis, B.T. Detection of chemical warfare agents using nanostructured metal oxide sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 108, 41–55. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tomchenko, A.; Harmer, G.P.; Marquis, B.T.; Allen, J.W. Semiconducting metal oxide sensor array for the selective detection of combustion gases. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2003, 93, 126–134. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ford, P.C.; Lorkovic, I.M. Mechanistic aspects of the reactions of nitric oxide with Transition-Metal complexes. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 993–1018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kung, M.C.; Kung, H.H. IR studies of NH3, Pyridine, CO, and NO adsorbed on transition metal oxides. Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 1985, 27, 425–460. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kutal, C. Spectroscopic and photochemical properties of d10 metal complexes. Coor. Chem. Rev. 1990, 99, 213–252. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchell, M.B.; Sheinker, V.N.; Tesfamichael, A.B.; Gatimu, E.N.; Nunley, M. Decomposition of dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) on supported cerium and iron co-impregnated oxides at room temperature. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 580–586. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchell, M.B.; Sheinker, V.N.; Cox, W.W.; Gatimu, E.N.; Tesfamichael, A.B. The room temperature decomposition mechanism of dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) on alumina-supported cerium oxide-participation of nano-sized cerium oxide domains. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1634–1645. [Google Scholar]
  20. Linsebigler, A.L.; Lu, G.; Yates, J.T., Jr. Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735–758. [Google Scholar]
  21. Segal, S.R.; Suib, S.L. Photo-assisted decomposition of dimethyl methylphosphonate over amorphous manganese oxide catalysts. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1687–1695. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohamed, A.A.; Mubarak, A.T.; Marestani, Z.M.; Fawy, K.F. Highly sensitive and selective catalytic determination of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. Talanta 2008, 74, 578–585. [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, T.; Lin, X.; Xing, J.; Wang, W.; Shan, Z.; Huang, F. Photocatalytic activities of hetero-junction semiconductors WO3/SrNb2O6. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2007, 141, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kang, Y.; Wan, B. Gold and iron supported on Y-type zeolite for carbon monoxide oxidation. Catal. Today 1997, 35, 379–392. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moens, L.; Ruiz, P.; Delmon, B.; Devillers, M. Evaluation of the role played by bismuth molybdates in Bi2Sn2O7–MoO3 catalysts used for partial oxidation of isobutene to methacrolein. Appl. Catal. A: General 1999, 180, 299–315. [Google Scholar]
  26. Addamo, M.; Augugliaro, V.; Coluccia, S.; Faga, M.; García-López, E.; Loddo, V.; Marcì, G; Martra, G.; Palmisano, L. Photocatalytic oxidation of acetonitrile in gas–solid and liquid–solid regimes. J. Catal. 2005, 235, 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kang, M. Methanol conversion on metal-incorporated SAPO-34s (MeAPSO-34s). J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 160, 437–444. [Google Scholar]
  28. Busca, G. The use of vibrational spectroscopies in studies of heterogeneous catalysis by metal oxides: an introduction. Catal. Today 1996, 27, 323–352. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunn, J.P.; Koppula, P.R.; Stenger, H.G.; Wachs, I.E. Oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide over supported vanadia catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ 1998, 19, 103–117. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kang, M.; Kim, B; Cho, S.; Chung, C.; Kim, B; Han, G.; Yoon., K. Decomposition of toluene using an atmospheric pressure plasma/TiO2 catalytic system. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2002, 180, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  31. Finlayson, A.P.; Ward, E; Tsaneva, V.N.; Glowacki, B.A. Bi2O3–WO3 compounds for photocatalytic applications by solid state and viscous processing. J. Power Sources 2005, 145, 667–674. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gesheva, K.; Szekeres, A.; Ivanova, T. Optical properties of chemical vapor deposited thin films of molybdenum and tungsten based metal oxides. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2003, 76, 563–576. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhou, J.; Xia, Q.H.; Shen, S.C.; Kawi, S.; Hidajat, K. Catalytic oxidation of pyridine on the supported copper catalysts in the presence of excess oxygen. J. Catal. 2004, 225, 128–137. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kamegawa, T.; Takeuchi, R; Matsuoka, M.; Anpo, M. Photocatalytic oxidation of CO with various oxidants by Mo oxide species highly dispersed on SiO2 at 293 K. Catal. Today 2006, 111, 248–253. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kozlova, E.A.; Vorontsov, A.V. Noble metal and sulfuric acid modified TiO2 photocatalysts: Mineralization of organophosphorous compounds. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2006, 63, 114–123. [Google Scholar]
  36. Boronat, M.; Concepcion, P.; Corma, A.; Renz, M. Pecuiarities of Sn-beta and potential industrial applications. Catal. Today 2007, 121, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  37. Larrubia, M.A.; Ramis, G.; Busca, G. An FT-IR study of the adsorption and oxidation of N-containing compounds over Fe2O3-TiO2 SCR catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2001, 30, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  38. Battisha, I.K. Visible up-conversion photoluminescence from IR diode-pumped SiO2–TiO2 nano-composite films heavily doped with Er3+-Yb3+ and Nd3+-Yb3+. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2007, 353, 1748–1754. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cao, L.; Segal, S.R.; Suib, S.L.; Tang, X.; Satyapal, S. Thermocatalytic oxidation of dimethyl methylphosphonate on supported metal oxides. J. Catal. 2000, 194, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  40. Segal, S.R.; Cao, L.; Suib, S.L.; Tang, X.; Satyapal, S. Thermal decomposition of dimethyl methylphosphonate over manganese oxide catalysts. J. Catal. 2001, 198, 66–76. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kanan, S.M.; Abu-Yousef, I,A.; Abdo, N.M. The Photodecomposition of phosmet over UV irradiated silver nanoclusters doped in mordenite zeolite. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2007, 74, 130–136. [Google Scholar]
  42. Waghe, A.; Kanan, S.M.; Abu-Yousef, I.A.; Jensen, B.; Tripp, C.P. Infrared study of UV irradiated tungsten trioxide powders containing adsorbed dimethyl methyl phosphonate and trimethyl phosphate. Res. Chem. Int. 2006, 32, 613–623. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kanan, S.M.; Kanan, M.C.; Patterson, H.H. Silver nanoclusters doped in X and mordenite zeolites as heterogeneous catalysts for the decomposition of carbamate pesticides in solution. Res. Chem. Int. 2006, 32, 871–885. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kanan, M.C.; Kanan, S.M.; Patterson, H.H. Luminescence properties of silver(I)-exchanged zeolite Y and its use as a catalyst to photodecompose carbaryl in the presence of natural organic matter. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2003, 29, 691–704. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kanan, M.C.; Kanan, S.M.; Austin, R.N.; Patterson, H.H. The photodecomposition of carbaryl in the presence of silver-doped zeolite Y and Suwannee River natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2280–2285. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kanan, S.M.; Kanan, M.C.; Patterson, H.H. Photophysical properties of Ag(I)-exchanged zeolite A and the photoassisted degradation of malathion. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 7508–7516. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gamburg, Y.D.; Grosheva, M.; Biallozor, S.; Hass, M. The electrochemical deposition of nickel from electrolytes containing malonic acid. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2002, 150, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hammond, J.; Marquis, B.; Michaels, R.; Oickle, B.; Segee, B.; Vetelino, J.; Camire, M.E.; Davis-Dentici, K. A semiconducting metal-oxide array for monitoring fish freshiness. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 84, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lei, H.; Zhu, X.; Sun, Y.; Song, W. Preparation of SrMoO4 thin films on Si substrates by chemical solution deposition. J. Cryst. Growth 2008, 310, 789–793. [Google Scholar]
  50. Suominen, T.; Raittila, J.; Paturi, P. Pure and fully texturized Sr2FeMoO6 thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition from target made with citrate-gel method. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 5793–5797. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cui, C.; Bi, J.; Gao, D. A simple chemical method for the deposition of highly crystallized SrMoO4 films. J. Alloys Comp. 2009, 470, L21–L24. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dai, H.Y.; Wang, B.; Zhang, M.; Wang, R.Z.; Song, X.M.; Du, Y.S.; Yan, H. Growth of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 films on Si(001) using SrMnO3 template layer. Vacuum 2006, 80, 914–917. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sugiyama, K.; Hayashi, K; Sasaki, J.; Ichiko, O.; Hashiguchi, Y. Microstructure and wear behaviour of chromium nitride films formed by ion-beam-enhanced deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1994, 66, 505–508. [Google Scholar]
  54. Willmott, P.R. Deposition of complex multielemental thin films. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2004, 76, 163–217. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pereira, A.; Cultrera, L.; Dima, A.; Susu, M.; Perrone, A.; Du, H.L.; Volkov, A.O.; Cutting, R.; Datta, P.K. Pulsed laser deposition and characterization of textured Pd-doped-SnO2 thin films for gas sensing applications. Thin Solid Films 2006, 497, 142–148. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhao, H.; Levi, C.G.; Wadley, H.N. Vapor deposited samarium zirconate thermal barrier coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2009, 203, 3157–3167. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bonnet, G.; Lachkar, M.; Colson, J.C.; Larpin, J.P. Characterization of thin solid films of rare earth oxides formed by the metallo-organic chemical vapour deposition technique, for high temperature corrosion applications. Thin Solid Films 1995, 261, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bernhardt, G.; Silvestre, C.; LeCursi, N.; Moulzolf, S.C.; Frankel, D.J.; Lad, R.J. Performance of Zr and Ti adhesion layers for bonding of platinum metallization to sapphire substrates. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 77, 368–374. [Google Scholar]
  59. Atanasov, P.A.; Tomov, R.I.; Serbezov, V.S. Plasma assisted in situ laser deposition of Y1Ba2Cu3O7−x superconducting thin films with laser heating and annealing. Vacuum 1994, 45, 1215–1219. [Google Scholar]
  60. Archer, N.J. Vapour deposition of wear-resistant surfaces. Tribol. Int. 1978, 11, 135–138. [Google Scholar]
  61. Moseley, P.T.; Norris, J.O.; Williams, D.E. (Eds.) Techniques and Mechanisms in Gas Sensing; Adam Hilger: Bristol, UK, 1991.
  62. Madou, M.J.; Morrison, S.R. Chemical Sensing with Solid State Devices; Academic Press, Inc./Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publ.: Boston, MA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  63. Gas Sensors-Principles Operation and Developmens; Sberveglieri, G. (Ed.) Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992.
  64. Korotcenkov, G. Gas response control through structural and chemical modification of metal oxide films: state of the art and approaches. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 107, 209–232. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lu, Z.; Kanan, S.M.; Tripp, C.P. Synthesis of high surface area monoclinic WO3 particles using organic ligands and emulsion based methods. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 983–989. [Google Scholar]
  66. Williams, D. Semiconducting oxides as gas-sensitive resistors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1999, 57, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kupriyanov, L.Y. (Ed.) Semiconductor Sensors in Physico-Chemical Studies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996.
  68. Morrison, S.R. Mechanism of semiconductor gas sensor operation. Sens. Actuat. 1987, 11, 283–287. [Google Scholar]
  69. Van de Krol, R.; Tuller, H.L. Electroceramics-the role of interfaces. Solid State Ionics 2002, 150, 167–179. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yamazoe, N.; Sakai, G.; Shimanoe, K. Oxide semiconductor gas sensors. Catal. Surv. Asia. 2003, 7, 63–75. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yamazoe, N. Toward innovations of gas sensor technology. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 108, 2–14. [Google Scholar]
  72. Henrich, V.E.; Cox, P.A. The Surface Science of Metal Oxides; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  73. Cox, P.A. Transition Metal Oxides: An Introduction to their Electronic Structure and Properties; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hamnett, A.; Goodenough, J.B.O. Semiconductors, Group III: Crystal and Solid State Physics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1984; Volume 17. [Google Scholar]
  75. Krilov, O.V.; Kisilev, V.F. Adsorption and Catalysis on the Transition Metals and their Oxides; Springer-Verlag: Berlin: Heidelberg, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  76. Samsonov, G.V. The Oxide Handbook; IFI/Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  77. Boakye, F.; Nusenu, D. The energy band gap of cadmium sulphide. Solis State Commun. 1997, 102, 323–326. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ueda, M.; Ohtsuka, T. Luminescence from band-gap photo-excitation of titanium anodic oxide films. Corr. Sci. 2002, 44, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar]
  79. Dorenbos, P. The Eu3+ charge transfer energy and the relation with the band gap of compounds. J. Luminescence 2005, 111, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kumar, V.; Sharma, S.K.; Sharma, T.P. ; Singh. V. Band gap determination in thick films from reflectance measurements. Opt. Mater. 1999, 12, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  81. Gupta, L.; Mansingh, A.; Srivastava, P.K. Band gap narrowing and the band structure of tin-doped indium oxide films. Thin Solid Films 1989, 176, 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  82. Palankovski, V.; Kaiblinger-Grujin, G.; Selberherr, S. Study of dopant-dependent band gap narrowing in compound semiconductor devices. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 1999, 66, 46–49. [Google Scholar]
  83. Yang, J.; Kim, W.S.; Park, H. Chemical bonding states and energy band gap of SiO2-incorporated La2O3 films on n-GaAs (001). Thin Solid Films 2006, 494, 311–314. [Google Scholar]
  84. Siddiqi, S.A.; Masih, M.; Mateen, A. Optical band gap in Cd-Mn-phosphate glasses. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1995, 40, 69–72. [Google Scholar]
  85. Moseley, P.T.; Tofield, B.C. (Eds.) Solid State Gas Sensors; Adam Hilger: Bristol, U.K. and Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1987.
  86. Mandelis, A.; Christofides, C. (Eds.) Physics, Chemistry and Technology of Solid State Gas Sensor Devices; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993.
  87. Schierbaum, K.D. Engineering of oxide surfaces and metal/oxide interfaces for chemical sensors: recent trends. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1995, 24, 239–247. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kappler, J.; Tomescu, A.; Barsan, N.; Weimar, U. CO consumption of Pd doped SnO2 based sensors. Thin Solid Films 2001, 391, 186–191. [Google Scholar]
  89. Sayago, I.; Santos, H.; Horrillo, M.C.; Aleixandere, M.; Fernandez, M.J.; Terrrado, E.; Tacchini, I.; Aroz, R.; Maser, W.K.; Benito, A.M.; Martinez, M.T.; Gutierrez, J.; Munoz, E. Carbon nanotube networks as gas sensors for NO2 detection. Talanta 2008, 77, 758–764. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ueda, T.; Katsuki, K.; Narges, H.A.; Ikegami, T.; Mitsugi, F. Fabrication and characterization of carbon nanotube based high sensitive gas sensors operable at room temperature. Diamond Rel. Mater. 2008, 17, 1586–1589. [Google Scholar]
  91. Penza, M.; Rossi, R.; Alvisi, M.; Cassano, G.; Signore, M.A.; Serra, E.; Giorgi, R. Pt- and Pd-nanoclusters functionalized carbon nanotubes networked films for sub-ppm gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 135, 289–297. [Google Scholar]
  92. Balázsi, C.; Sedlácková, K.; Llobet, E.; Ionescu, R. Novel hexagonal WO3 nanopowder with metal decorated carbon nanotubes as NO2 gas sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  93. Pnozoni, A.; Comini, E.; Ferroni, M.; Sberveglieri, G. Nanostructured WO3 deposited by modified thermal evaporation for gas-sensing applications. Thin Solid Films 2005, 490, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  94. Boulova, M.; Gaskov, A.; Lucazeau, G. Tungsten oxide reactivity versus CH4, CO and NO2 molecules studied by Raman spectroscopy. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 81, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  95. Tamaki, J.; Miyaji, A.; Makinodan, J.; Ogura, S.; Konishi, S. Effect of micro-gap electrode on detection of dilute NO2 using WO3 thin film microsensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 108, 202–206. [Google Scholar]
  96. Vallejos, S.; Khatko, V.; Calderer, J.; Gracia, I.; Cané, C.; Llobet, E.; Correig, X. Micro-machined WO3-based sensors selective to oxidizing gases. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 132, 209–215. [Google Scholar]
  97. Siciliano, T.; Tepore, A.; Micocci, G.; Serra, A.; Manno, D.; Filippo, E. WO3 gas sensors prepared by thermal oxidization of tungsten. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 321–326. [Google Scholar]
  98. Jiun-Chan, Y.; Prabir, K.D. Solution-based synthesis of efficient WO3 sensing electrodes for high temperature potentiometric NOx sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 136, 523–529. [Google Scholar]
  99. Ferroni, M.; Boscarino, D.; Comini, E.; Gnani, D.; Guidi, V.; Martinelli, G.; Nelli, P.; Rigato, V.; Sberveglieri, G. Nanosized thin films of tungsten-titanium mixed oxides as gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1999, 58, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  100. Guidi, V.; Boscarino, D.; Comini, E.; Faglia, G.; Ferroni, M.; Malagù, C.; Martinelli, G.; Rigato, V.; Sberveglieri, G. Preparation and characterisation of titanium–tungsten sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 65, 264–266. [Google Scholar]
  101. Comini, E.; Ferroni, M.; Guidi, V.; Faglia, G.; Martinelli, G.; Sberveglieri, G. Nanostructured mixed oxides compounds for gas sensing applications. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 84, 26–32. [Google Scholar]
  102. Penza, M.; Martucci, C.; Cassano, G. NOx gas sensing characteristics of WO3 thin films activated by noble metals (Pd, Pt, Au) layers. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1998, 50, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  103. Marquis, B.T.; Vetelino, J.F. A semiconducting metal oxide sensor array for the detection of NOx and NH3. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 65, 100–110. [Google Scholar]
  104. Kawasaki, H.; Ueda, T.; Suda, Y.; Ohshima, T. Properties of metal doped tungsten oxide thin films for NOx gas sensors grown by PLD method combined with sputtering process. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2004, 100, 266–269. [Google Scholar]
  105. Reyes, L.F.; Hoel, A.; Saukko, S.; Heszler, P.; Lantto, V.; Granqvist, C.G. Gas sensor response of pure and activated WO3 nanoparticle films made by advanced reactive gas deposition. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 117, 128–134. [Google Scholar]
  106. Xia, H.J.; Wang, Y.; Kong, F.H.; Wang, S.R.; Zhu, B.L.; Guo, X.Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.M.; Wu, S.H. Au-doped WO3-based sensor for NO2 detection at low operating temperature. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 134, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  107. Filippini, D.; Fraigi, L.; Aragón, R.; Weimar, U. Thick film Au-gate field-effect devices sensitive to NO2. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 81, 296–300. [Google Scholar]
  108. Yang, J.; Dutta, P.K. Promoting selectivity and sensitivity for a high temperature YSZ-based electrochemical total NOx sensor by using a Pt-loaded zeolite Y filter. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 125, 30–39. [Google Scholar]
  109. Tomchenko, A.A. Structure and gas-sensitive properties of WO3–Bi2O3 mixed thick films. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 68, 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  110. Khatko, V.; Llobet, E.; Vilanova, X.; Brezmes, J.; Hubalek, J.; Malysz, K.; Correig, X. Gas sensing properties of nanoparticle indium-doped WO3 thick films. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  111. Xu, P.C.; Cheng, Z,X.; Pan, Q.Y.; Xu, J.Q.; Xiang, Q.; Yu, W.J.; Chu, Y.L. High aspect ratio In2O3 nanowires: Synthesis, mechanism and NO2 gas-sensing properties. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 130, 802–808. [Google Scholar]
  112. Ali, M.; Wang, C.Y.; Röhlig, C.C.; Cimalla, V.; Stauden, Th.; Ambacher, O. NOx sensing properties of In2O3 thin films grown by MOCVD. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 129, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  113. Steffes, H.; Imawan, C.; Solzbacher, F.; Obermeier, E. Enhancement of NO2 sensing properties of In2O3-based thin films using an Au or Ti surface modification. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 78, 106–112. [Google Scholar]
  114. Cantalini, C.; Wlodarski, W.; Sun, H.T.; Atashbar, M.Z.; Passacantando, M.; Santucci, S. NO2 response of In2O3 thin film gas sensors prepared by sol–gel and vacuum thermal evaporation techniques. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 65, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  115. Sber veglieri, G.; Benussi, P.; Coccoli, G.; Groppelli, S.; Nelli, P. Reactivity sputtered indium tin oxide polycrystalline thin films as NO and NO2 gas sensors. Thin Solid Films 1990, 186, 349–360. [Google Scholar]
  116. Sayago, I.; Gutiérrez, J.; Arés, L.; Robla, J.I.; Horillo, M.C.; Getino, J.; Rino, J.; Agapito, J.A. The effect of additives in tin oxide on the sensitivity and selectivity to NOx and CO. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1995, 26/27, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  117. Barbi, G.B.; Blanco, J.S. Structure of tin oxide layers and operating temperature as factors determining the sensitivity to NOx. Sens. Actuat. B 1993, 15/16, 372–378. [Google Scholar]
  118. Tanaka, K.; Morimoto, S.; Sonoda, S.; Matsuura, S.; Moriya, K.; Egashira, M. Combustion monitoring sensor using tin dioxide semiconductor. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1991, 3, 247–253. [Google Scholar]
  119. Williams, G.; Coles, G.S. NOx response of tin dioxide based gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1993, 16, 349–353. [Google Scholar]
  120. Gutierrez, F.J.; Arés, L.; Robla, J.I.; Horillo, M.C.; Sayago, I.; Getino, J.M.; Agapito, J.A. NOx tin dioxide sensor activities as a function of doped materials and temperature. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1993, 15/16, 354–356. [Google Scholar]
  121. Sberveglieri, S.; Faglia, G.; Groppelli, S.; Nelli, P. Methods for the preparation of NO, NO2 and H2 sensors based on tine oxide thin films grown by means of RF magnetron sputtering techniques. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1992, 8, 79–88. [Google Scholar]
  122. Satake, K.; Kobayashi, A.; Inoue, T.; Nakahara, T.; Takeuchi, T. NOx sensors for exhaust monitoring. Proceedings of the Third International Meeting on Chem. Sensors, Cleveland, OH, USA, September 24–26, 1990; pp. 334–337.
  123. Wiegleb, G.; Heitbaum, J. Semiconductor gas sensor for detecting NO and CO traces in ambient air of road traffic. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1994, 17, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  124. DiNatale, C.; D'Amico, A.; Davide, F.A.; Faglia, G.; Nelli, P.; Sberveglieri, G. Performance evalation of an SnO2-based sensor array for the quantitative measurement of mixtures of H2S and NO2. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1994, 20, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
  125. Sayago, I.; Gutiérrez, J.; Arés, L.; Robla, J.I.; Horillo, M.C.; Getino, J.; Rino, J.; Agapito, J.A. Long-term reliability of sensors for detection of nitrogen dioxides. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1995, 26/27, 56–58. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kaur, J.; Roy, S.C.; Bhatnagar, M.C. Highly sensitive SnO2 thin film NO2 gas sensor operating at low temperature. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 123, 1090–1095. [Google Scholar]
  127. Yongki, M.; Harry, L.,T.; Stefan, P.; Jürgen, W.; Harald, B. Gas response of reactively sputtered ZnO films on Si-based micro-array. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2003, 93, 435–441. [Google Scholar]
  128. Shalaka, N.; Ravi, V.; Srinivas, D.; Mulla, I.S.; Gosavi, S.W.; Kulkarni, S.K. EPR and DRS evidence for NO2 sensing in Al-doped ZnO. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 130, 668–673. [Google Scholar]
  129. Nanto, H.; Minami, T.; Takata, S. Ammonia gas sensor using sputtered zinc oxide thin film. Proceedings of the 5th Sensor Symposium; Institute of Electrical Engineering of Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 1985; pp. 191–194. [Google Scholar]
  130. Arya, S.P.; D'Amico, A.; Verona, E. Study of sputtered ZnO–Pd thin films as solid state H2 and NH3 gas sensors. Thin Solid Films 1988, 157, 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  131. Nanto, H.; Sokooshi, H.; Usuda, T. Smell sensor using aluminum-doped zinc oxide thin film prepared by sputtering technique. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1993, 10, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  132. Sberveglieri, G.; Groppelli, S.; Nelli, P. A novel method for the preparation of ZnO–In thin films for selective NH3 detection. Proceedings of the 5th International Meeting on Chemical Sensors, Rome, Italy; 1994; pp. 748–751. [Google Scholar]
  133. Nanto, H.; Sokooshi, H.; Kawai, T.; Usuda, T. Zinc-oxide thin-film trimethylamine sensor with high sensitivity and excellent selectivity. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1992, 11, 235–237. [Google Scholar]
  134. Nanto, H.; Minami, T.; Takata, S. Zinc-oxide thin-film ammonia gas sensors with high sensititivity and excellent selectivity. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 60, 482–484. [Google Scholar]
  135. Siciliano, T.; Di Giulio, M.; Tepore, M.; Filippo, E.; Micocci, G.; Tepore, A. Tellurium sputtered thin films as NO2 gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 135, 250–254. [Google Scholar]
  136. Siciliano, T.; Giulio, M.D.; Tepore, M.; Filippo, E.; Micocci, G.; Tepore, A. Room temperature NO2 sensing properties of reactivity sputtered TeO2 thin films. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 137, 644–648. [Google Scholar]
  137. Barazzouk, S.; Tandon, R.P.; Hotchandani, S. MoO3-based sensor for NO, NO2 and CH4 detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 119, 691–694. [Google Scholar]
  138. Brunet, J.; Parra Garcia, V.; Pauly, A.; Varenne, C.; Lauron, B. An optimised gas sensor microsystem for accurate and real-time measurement of nitrogen dioxide at ppb level. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 134, 632–639. [Google Scholar]
  139. Leo, G.; Rella, R.; Siciliano, P.; Capone, S.; Alonso, J.C.; Pankov, V.; Ortiz, A. Sprayed SnO2 thin films for NO2 sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1999, 58, 370–374. [Google Scholar]
  140. Girardin, D.; Berger, F.; Chambaudet, A.; Planade, R. Modelling of SO2 detection by tin dioxide gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1997, 43, 147–153. [Google Scholar]
  141. Do, J.S.; Chen, P.J. Amperometric sensor array for NOx, CO, O2 and SO2 detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 122, 165–173. [Google Scholar]
  142. Wang, L.; Kumar, R.V. A new SO2 gas sensor based on an Mg2+ conducting solid electrolyte. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 543, 109–114. [Google Scholar]
  143. Li, H.; Wang, Q.; Xu, J.; Zhang, W.; Jin, L. A novel nano-Au-assembled amperometric SO2 gas sensor: preparation, characterization and sensing behavior. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 2002, 87, 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  144. Min, B.; Choi, S. SO2-sensing characteristics of Nasicon sensors with Na2SO4–BaSO4 sensing electrolytes. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 2003, 93, 209–213. [Google Scholar]
  145. Wang, L.; Kumar, R.V. A SO2 gas sensor based upon composite Nasicon/Sr-β-Al2O3 bielectrolyte. Mater. Res. Bull. 2005, 40, 1802–1815. [Google Scholar]
  146. Liang, X.H.; Zhong, T.G.; Quan, B.F.; Wang, B.; Guan, H.S. Solid-state potentiometric SO2 sensor combining NASICON with V2O5-doped TiO2 electrode. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 134, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  147. Matsuguchi, M.; Tamai, K.; Sakai, Y. SO2 gas sensors using polymers with different amino groups. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 77, 363–367. [Google Scholar]
  148. Dultsev, F.N.; Sveshnikova, L.L. The use of the substituted imidazoline radical as a receptor for sulphur dioxide gas sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 120, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  149. Endres, H.E.; Drost, S.; Hutter, F. Impedance spectroscopy on dielectric gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1994, 22, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  150. Pribil, R.; Bilkova, E. The use of a piezoelectric crystal to determine sulphur dioxide in gases. Talanta 1992, 39, 361–366. [Google Scholar]
  151. Agbor, N.E.; Petty, M.C.; Monkman, A.P. Polyaniline thin films for gas sensing. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 1995, 28, 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  152. Ranucci, E.; Putelli, L.; Ferruti, P.; Ferrari, V.; Marioli, D.; Taroni, A. Use of poly(amidoamines) as CO2- and SO2-sensitive material for gravimetric sensors. Mikrochim. Acta 1995, 120, 257–270. [Google Scholar]
  153. Benmarkroha, F.; Boudjerda, T.; Boufenar, R.; Allag, H.; Djerboua, F.; McCallum, J.J. Monitoring of sulfur dioxide using a piezoelectric crystal based controller. Analyst 1993, 118, 401–406. [Google Scholar]
  154. Berger, F.; Fromm, M.; Chambaudet, A.; Planade, R. Tin dioxide-based gas sensors for SO2 detection: a chemical interpretation of the increase in sensitivity obtained after a primary detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1997, 45, 175–181. [Google Scholar]
  155. Torvela, H.; Huusko, J.; Lantto, V. Reduction of the interference caused by NO and SO2 in the CO response of Pd-catalysed SnO2 combustion gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1991, 4, 479–484. [Google Scholar]
  156. Shimizu, Y.; Matsunaga, N.; Hyodo, T.; Egashira, M. Improvement of SO2 sensing properties of WO3 by noble metal loading. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 77, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  157. Stankova, M.; Vilanova, X.; Calderer, J.; Llobet, E.; Ivanov, P.; Gràcia, I.; Cané, C.; Correig, X. Detection of SO2 and H2S in CO2 stream by means of WO3-based micro-hotplate sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2004, 102, 219–225. [Google Scholar]
  158. Penza, M.; Cassano, G.; Tortorella, F. Gas recognition by activated WO3 thin-film sensors array. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 81, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  159. Lin, H.; Hsu, C.; Yang, H.; Lee, P.; Yang, C. Nanocrystalline WO3-based H2S sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1994, 22, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  160. Frühberger, B.; Grunze, M.; Dwyer, D.J. Surface chemistry of H2S-sensetive tungsten oxide films. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1996, 31, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  161. Ruokamo, I.; Kärkkäinen, T.; Huusko, J.; Ruokanen, T.; Blomberg, M.; Torvela, H.; Lantto, V. H2S response of WO3 thin-film sensors manufactured bysilicon processing technology. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1994, 18–19, 486–488. [Google Scholar]
  162. Vangrunderbeek, J.; Vandecruys, F.; Kumar, R.V. Sensing mechanism of high temperature hydrogen sulphide sensor based on sodium β-alumina. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1999, 56, 129–135. [Google Scholar]
  163. Solis, J.L.; Saukko, S.; Kish, L.B.; Granqvist, C.G.; Lantto, V. Nanocrystalline tungsten oxide thick-films with high sensitivity to H2S at room temperature. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 77, 316–321. [Google Scholar]
  164. Tao, W.H.; Tsai, C.H. H2S sensing properties of noble metal doped WO3 thin film sensor fabricated by micromachining. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 81, 237–247. [Google Scholar]
  165. Sekhar, C.R.; Manu, H.; Rao, C.N. H2S sensors based on tungsten oxide nanostructures. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 128, 488–493. [Google Scholar]
  166. Vuong, D.; Sakai, G.; Shimanoe, K.; Yamazoe, N. Hydrogen sulfide gas sensing properties of thin films derived from SnO2 sols different in grain size. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 105, 437–442. [Google Scholar]
  167. Kim, S; Park, M.; Kim, H. Systematic approach for the evaluation of the optimal fabrication conditions of a H2S gas sensor with Taguchi method. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2004, 102, 253–260. [Google Scholar]
  168. Gong, J; Chen, Q.; Lian, M.; Liu, N.; Stevenson, R.G.; Adami, F. Micromachined nanocrystalline silver doped SnO2 H2S sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 114, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  169. Liang, X.; He, Y.; Liu, F.; Wang, B.; Zhong, T.; Quan, B.; Lu, G. Solid-state potentiometric H2S sensor combining NASICON with Pr6O11- doped SnO2 electrode. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 125, 544–549. [Google Scholar]
  170. Ghimbeu, C.M.; Lumbreras, M.; Siadat., M.; Van Landschoot, R.C.; Schoonman, J. Electrostatic sprayed SnO2 and Cu-doped SnO2 films for H2S detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 694–698. [Google Scholar]
  171. Gong, S.; Jing, X.; Jianqiao, L.; Dongxiang, Z. Highly sensitive SnO2 thin film with low operating temperature prepared by sol-gel technique. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 134, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  172. Wong, C.; Chu, X.; Wu, M. Detection of H2S down to ppb levels at room temperature using sensors based on ZnO nanorods. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 113, 320–323. [Google Scholar]
  173. Liu, Z.; Fan, T.; Zhang, D.; Gong, X.; Xu, J. Hierachically porous ZnO with high sensitivity and selectivity to H2S derived from biotemplates. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 136, 499–509. [Google Scholar]
  174. Wallace, K.J.; Cordero, S.R.; Tan, C.P.; Lynch, V.M.; Anslyn, E.V. A colorimetric response to hydrogen sulphide. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 120, 362–367. [Google Scholar]
  175. Jain, G.H.; Patil, L.A. CuO-doped BSST thick film resistors for ppb level H2S gas sensing at room temperature. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 123, 246–253. [Google Scholar]
  176. Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, B.; Kong, F.; Wang, D.; Wu, S.; Huang, W.; Zhang, S. H2S sensing characterisitic of Pt-doped α-Fe2O3 thick film sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 125, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
  177. Kapse, V.D.; Ghosh, S.A.; Raghuwanshi, F.C.; Kapse, S.D. Enhanced H2S sensing characteristics of La- doped In2O3: Effect of Pd sensitization. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 137, 681–686. [Google Scholar]
  178. Kaur, M.; Jain, N.; Sharma, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Roy, M.; Tyagi, A.K.; Gupta, S.K.; Yakhmi, J.V. Room-temperature H2S gas sensing at ppb level by single crystal In2O3 whiskers. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 456–461. [Google Scholar]
  179. Yang, W.; Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Kong, F.; Xia, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, B.; Wang, S.; Wu, S. Low-Temperature H2S sensors based on Ag-doped α- Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 131, 183–189. [Google Scholar]
  180. Fam, D.; Tok, A.I.; Palaniappan, A.; Nopphawan, P.; Anup, L.; Mhaisalkar, S.G. Selective sensing of hydrogen sulphide using silver nanoparticle decorated carbon nanotubes. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 138, 189–192. [Google Scholar]
  181. Jain, G.H.; Patil, L.A.; Wagh, M.S.; Patil, D.R.; Patil, S.A.; Amalnerkar, D.P. Surface modified BaTiO3 thick film resistors as H2S gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 117, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  182. Sarma, T.; Tao, S. An active core fiber optic sensor for detecting trace H2S at high temperature using a cadmium oxide doped porous silica optical fiber as a transducer. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 127, 471–479. [Google Scholar]
  183. Sen, S.; Bhandarkar, V.; Muthe, K.P.; Roy, M.; Deshpande, S.K.; Aiyer, R.C.; Gupta, S.K.; Yakhmi, J.V.; Sahni, V.C. Highly sensitive hydrogen sulphide sensors operable at room temperature. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 115, 270–275. [Google Scholar]
  184. Tong, M.; Dai, G.; Gao, D. WO3 thin film sensor prepared by sol-gel technique and its low-temperature sensing properties to trimethlyamine. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2001, 69, 176–179. [Google Scholar]
  185. Bendahan, M.; Lauque, P.; Seguin, J.; Aguir, K.; Knauth, P. Development of an ammonia gas sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2003, 95, 170–176. [Google Scholar]
  186. Wagh, M.S.; Jain, G.H.; Patil, D.R.; Patil, S.A.; Patil, L.A. Modified zinc oxide thick film resistors as NH3 gas sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 115, 128–133. [Google Scholar]
  187. Wang, Y.D.; Wu, X.; Su, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Z. Ammonia-sensing characteristics of Pt and SiO2 doped SnO2 materials. Solid-State Electron. 2001, 45, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
  188. Suryawanshi, D.N.; Patil, D.R.; Patil, L.A. Fe2O3-activated Cr2O3 thick films as temperature dependent gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 134, 579–584. [Google Scholar]
  189. Patil, D.R.; Patil, L.A.; Patil, P.P. Cr2O3-activated ZnO thick film resistors for ammonia gas sensing operable at room temperature. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 126, 368–374. [Google Scholar]
  190. Petrov, V.V.; Nazarova, T.N.; Korolev, A.N.; Kopilova, N.F. Thin sol-gel SiO2-SnOx-AgOy films for low temperature ammonia gas sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 291–295. [Google Scholar]
  191. Gong, J.W.; Chen, Q.F.; Fei, W.F.; Seal, S. Micromachined nanocrystalline SnO2 chemical gas sensors for electronic nose. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2004, 102, 117–125. [Google Scholar]
  192. Li, J.G.; Kawi, S. Synthesis, characterization and sensing application of novel semiconductor oxides. Talanta 1998, 45, 759–766. [Google Scholar]
  193. Gong, J.W.; Sun, J.R.; Chen, Q.F. Micromachined sol-gel carbon nanotube/SnO2 nanocomposite hydrogen sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 130, 829–835. [Google Scholar]
  194. Sekimoto, S.; Nakagawa, H.; Okazaki, S.; Fukuda, K.; Asakura, S.; Shigemori, T.; Takahashi, S. A fibre–optic evanescent-wave hydrogen gas sensor using palladium-supported tungsten oxide. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 66, 142–145. [Google Scholar]
  195. Scientific Facts on Air Pollution Ozone. Available online: http://www.greenfacts.org/en/ozone-o3/index.htm (accessed September 20, 2009).
  196. Aguir, K.; Lemire, C.; Lollman, D.B. Electrical properties of reactively sputtered WO3 thin films as ozone gas sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 84, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  197. Guerin, J.; Aguir, K.; Bendahan, M.; Lambert-Mauriat, C. Thermal modelling of a WO3 ozone sensor response. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 104, 289–293. [Google Scholar]
  198. Utembe, S.R.; Hansford, G.M.; Sanderson, M.G.; Freshwater, R.A.; Pratt, K.F.; Williams, D.E.; Cox, R.A.; Jones, R.L. An ozone monitoring instrument based on the tungsten trioxide (WO3) semiconductor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 114, 507–512. [Google Scholar]
  199. Labidi, A.; Gillet, E.; Delamare, R.; Maaref, M.; Aguir, K. Ethanol and ozone sensing characteristics of WO3 based sensors activated by Au and Pd. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 120, 338–345. [Google Scholar]
  200. Boulmani, R.; Bendahan, M.; Lambert-Mauriate, C.; Gillet, M.; Aguir, K. Correlation between rf-sputtering parameters and WO3 sensor response towards ozone. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 125, 622–627. [Google Scholar]
  201. Guerin, J.; Bendahan, M.; Aguir, K. A dynamic response model for the WO3-based ozone sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 128, 462–467. [Google Scholar]
  202. Vallejos, S.; Khatko, V.; Aguir, K.; Ngo, K.A.; Calderer, J.; Gracia, I.; Cane, C.; Llobet, E.; Correig, X. Ozone monitoring by micro-machined sensors with WO3 sensing films. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 126, 573–578. [Google Scholar]
  203. Belkacem, W.; Labidi, A.; Guerin, J.; Mliki, N.; Aguir, K. Cobalt nanograins effect on the ozone detection by WO3 sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 132, 196–201. [Google Scholar]
  204. Sauter, D.; Weimar, U.; Noetzel, G.; Mitrovics, J.; Gopel, W. Development of Modular Ozone Sensor System for application in practical use. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 69, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  205. Korotcenkov, G.; Blinov, I.; Ivanov, M.; Stetter, J.R. Ozone sensors on the base of SnO2 films deposited by spray pyrolysis. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 120, 679–686. [Google Scholar]
  206. Bendahan, M.; Boulmani, R.; Seguin, J.L.; Aguir, K. Characterisation of ozone sensors based on WO3 reactively sputtered films: influence of O2 concentration in the sputtering gas and working temperature. Sens. Actuat. B. Chem. 2004, 100, 320–324. [Google Scholar]
  207. Hellegouarc'h, F.; Arefi-Khonsari, F.; Planade1, R.; Amouroux, J. PECVD prepared SnO2 thin Films for ethanol sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 73, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  208. Jinkawa, T.; Sakai, G.; Tamaki, J.; Miura, N.; Yamazoe, N. Relationship between ethanol gas sensitivity and surface catalytic property of tin oxide sensors modified with acidic or basic oxides. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 155, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  209. Chu, D.; Zeng, Y.; Jiang, D.; Masuda, Y. In2O3–SnO2 nano-toasts and nanorods: Precipitation preparation, formation mechanism, and gas sensitive properties. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 137, 630–636. [Google Scholar]
  210. Zhang, T.S.; Hing, P.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.C. Selective detection of ethanol vapor and hydrogen using Cd-doped SnO –based sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1999, 60, 208–215. [Google Scholar]
  211. Hieu, N.; Kim, H.; Ju, B.; Lee, J. Enhanced performance of SnO2 nanowires ethanol sensor by functionalizing with La2O3. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 228–234. [Google Scholar]
  212. Ivanov, P.; Llobet, E.; Vilanova, X.; Brezmes, J.; Hubalek, J.; Correig, X. Development of high sensitivity ethanol gas sensors based on Pt-doped SnO2 surfaces. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2004, 99, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  213. Li, F.; Xu, J.; Yu, X.; Chen, L.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Z.; Xin, X. One-step solid-state reaction synthesis and gas sensing property of tin oxide nanoparticles. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 81, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  214. de Lacy Costello, B.P.; Ewen, R.J.; Guernion, N.; Ratcliffe, N.M. Highly sensitive mixed oxide sensors for the detection of ethanol. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 87, 207–210. [Google Scholar]
  215. Pin, L.V.; Tang, Z.A.; Yu, J.; Zhang, F.T.; Wei, G.F.; Huang, Z.X.; Hu, Y. Study on a micro-gas sensor with SnO2–NiO sensitive film for indoor formaldehyde detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 132, 74–80. [Google Scholar]
  216. Qi, Q.; Zhang, T.; Zheng, X.; Fan, H.; Liu, L.; Wang, R.; Zeng, Y. Electrical response of Sm2O3-doped SnO2 to C2H2 and effect of humidity interference. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 134, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  217. Haridasa, D.; Sreenivasa, K.; Gupta, V. Improved response characteristics of SnO2 thin film loaded with nanoscale catalysts for LPG detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 270–275. [Google Scholar]
  218. Wagh, M.S.; Jain, G.H.; Patil, D.R.; Patil, S.A.; Patil, L.A. Surface customization of SnO2 thick films using RuO2 as a surfactant for the LPG response. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 122, 357–364. [Google Scholar]
  219. Jain, K.; Pant, R.P.; Lakshmikumar, S.T. Effect of Ni doping on thick film SnO2 gas sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 113, 823–829. [Google Scholar]
  220. Pourfayaz, F.; Khodadadi, A.; Mortazavi, Y.; Mohajerzadeh, S.S. CeO2 doped SnO2 sensor selective to ethanol in presence of CO, LPG and CH4. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 108, 172–176. [Google Scholar]
  221. Ionescu, R.; Hoel, A.; Granqvist, C.G.; Llobet, E.; Heszler, P. Ethanol and H2S gas detection in air and in reducing and oxidising ambience: application of pattern recognition to analyse the output from temperature-modulated nanoparticulate WO3 gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 104, 124–131. [Google Scholar]
  222. Garzella, C.; Bontempi, E.; Depero, L.E.; Vomiero, A.; Della Mea, G.; Sberveglieri, G. Novel selective ethanol sensors: W/TiO2 thin films by sol–gel spin-coating. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2003, 93, 495–502. [Google Scholar]
  223. Khadayate, R.S.; Sali, J.V.; Patil, P.P. Acetone vapor sensing properties of screen printed WO3 thick films. Talanta 2007, 72, 1077–1081. [Google Scholar]
  224. Cao, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, N.; Peng, Y.; Liu, Y. An ether sensor utilizing cataluminescence on nanosized ZnWO4. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 137, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  225. Nguyen, V.H.; Nguyen, V.D.; Pham Thanh, H.; Nguyen, D.C. Inclusion of SWCNTs in Nb/Pt co-doped TiO2 thin film sensor for ethanol vapor detection. Phys. E. 2008, 40, 2950–2958. [Google Scholar]
  226. Pokhrel, S.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H.; Gao, S. Thick film of LaCr1−xTixO3 (x ≤ 0.4) perovskites prepared by combustion technique for alcohol sensing application. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 122, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
  227. Pokhrel, S.; Yang, M.; Huo, L.; Zhao, H.; Gao, S. Cr2−xTixO3 (x ≤ 0.5) as CH3COCH3 sensitive resistors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 125, 550–555. [Google Scholar]
  228. Xu, J.; Hanb, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xie, B. Studies on alcohol sensing mechanism of ZnO based gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 132, 334–339. [Google Scholar]
  229. Zhao, S.; Sin, J.; Xu, B.; Zhao, M.; Peng, Z.; Cai, H. A high performance ethanol senor based on field-effect transistor using a LaFeO3 nano-crystalline thin-film as a gate electrode. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 64, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  230. Liu, X.; Cheng, B.; Hu, J.; Qin, H.; Jiang, M. Preparation, structure, resistance and methane-gas sensing properties of nominal La1−xMgxFeO3. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 133, 340–344. [Google Scholar]
  231. Ajamia, S.; Mortazavia, Y.; Khodadadia, A.; Pourfayaza, F.; Mohajerzadehb, S. Highly selective sensor to CH4 in presence of CO and ethanol using LaCoO3 perovskite filter with Pt/SnO2. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 117, 420–425. [Google Scholar]
  232. Xuana, Y.; Hua, J.; Xua, K.; Houa, X.; Lva, Y. Development of sensitive carbon disulfide sensor by using its cataluminescence on nanosized-CeO2. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 136, 218–223. [Google Scholar]
  233. Kida, T.; Minami, T.; Kishib, S.; Yuasa, M.; Shimanoea, K.; Yamazoe, N. Planar-type BiCuVOx solid electrolyte sensor for the detection of volatile organic compounds. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 137, 147–153. [Google Scholar]
  234. Daza, L.; Dassy, S.; Delmon, B. Chemical sensors based on SnO2 and WO3 for the detection of formaldehyde: cooperative effects. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1993, 10, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  235. Sberveglieri, G.; Atashbar, M.Z.; Li, Y.; Wlodarski, W.; Comini, E.; Faglia, G.; Ghantasala, M.K. Nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films prepared by the sol–gel process for alcohol sensing. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators (Transducers 1999), Sendai, Japan, June 7–10, 1999; pp. 1690–1693.
  236. Beaudry, W.T.; Wagner, G.W.; Ward, J.R. Characterization of the molecular exchange process observed for dimethyl methylphosphonate adsorbed on a sorptive/reactive resin mixture by 31P magnetization-transfer and 2-D exchange MAS NMR. J. Mol. Catal. 1993, 83, 183–195. [Google Scholar]
  237. Beaudry, W.T.; Wagner, G.W.; Ward, J.R. Solid-state 31P MAS NMR study of the distribution and reaction of organophosphorus esters adsorbed on synthetic resin catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. 1992, 73, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  238. Lien, Y.H.; Zhou, H.Z.; Job, C.; Barry, J.A.; Gillies, R.J. In vivo31P NMR study of early cellular responses to hyperosmotic shock in cultured glioma cells. Biochimie 1992, 74, 931–939. [Google Scholar]
  239. Zhang, J.; Giotto, M.V.; Wen, W.; Jones, A. An NMR study of the state of ions and diffusion in perfluorosulfonate ionomer. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 269, 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  240. Canet, D.; Delpuech, J.A.; Khaddar, M.R.; Rubini, P. Carbon-13 NMR of solvation shells: Aluminium cation in aqueous organic solvents. J. Magn. Reson. 1974, 15, 325–338. [Google Scholar]
  241. Beaudry, W.T.; Wagner, G.W.; Ward, J.R. CuII—diamine complex catalyzed hydrolysis of phosphate triesters adsorbed on strong-base ion exchange resins. 31P NMR relaxation measurements. J. Mol. Catal. 1994, 93, 221–231. [Google Scholar]
  242. DeWolf, M.Y. The NMR spectra of dimethyl methyl phosphonate. J. Mol. Spect. 1965, 18, 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  243. Kirk, K.; Kuchel, P.W. Equilibrium exchange of dimethyl methylphosphonate across the human red cell membrane measured using NMR spin transfer. J. Magn. Reson. 1986, 68, 311–318. [Google Scholar]
  244. Delpuech, J.J.; Peguy, A.; Khaddar, M.R. An NMR study of solvation shells of diamagnetic cations in aqueous mixtures of organophosphorus solvents. J. Magn. Reson. 1972, 6, 325–335. [Google Scholar]
  245. Kirk, K.; Raftos, J.E.; Kuchel, P.W. Triethyl phosphate as an internal 31P NMR reference in biological samples. J. Magn. Reson. 1986, 70, 484–487. [Google Scholar]
  246. Harris, R.K.; Thompson, T.V.; Norman, P.R.; Pottage, C. Phosphorus-31 NMR studies of adsorption onto activated carbon. Carbon 1999, 37, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar]
  247. Hsu, C.; Dulcey, C.S.; Horwitz, J.S.; Lin, M.C. Mass spectrometric characterization of performance of a low-temperature oxidation catalyst. J. Mol. Catal. 1990, 60, 389–398. [Google Scholar]
  248. Werner, J.H.; Cool, T.A. Flame sampling photoionization mass spectrometry of CH3PO2 and CH3OPO2. Chem. Phys. Let. 1997, 275, 278–282. [Google Scholar]
  249. Cai, L.; Koziel, J.A.; O'Neal, M.E. Determination of characteristic odorants from Harmonia axyridis beetles using in vivo solid-phase microextraction and multidimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry–olfactometry. J. Chrom. A 2007, 1147, 66–78. [Google Scholar]
  250. Yang, M.; Kim, T.; Hwang, H.; Yi, S.; Kim, D. Development of a Palm Portable Mass Spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spect. 2008, 19, 1442–1448. [Google Scholar]
  251. Kettrup, A.; Ohrbach, K.; Matuschek, G.; Joachim, A. Thermal analysis-mass spectrometry and thermogravimetric adsorption on fire retardants. Thermochim. Acta 1990, 166, 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  252. Pilling, R.S.; Bernhardt, G.; Kim, C.S.; Duncan, J.; Crothers, C.B.; Kleinschmidt, D.; Frankel, D.J.; Lad, R.J.; Frederick, B.G. Quantifying gas sensor and delivery system response time using GC/MS. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2003, 96, 200–214. [Google Scholar]
  253. Chou, J.S.; Sumida, D.; Wittig, C. Two-frequency two-photon ionization of nascent PO(X2II) from the collision-free IR photolysis of dimethyl methylphosphonate. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 100, 397–402. [Google Scholar]
  254. Kantcheva, M.; Cayirtepe, I. Routes of formation and composition of NOx complexes adsorbed on palladium-promoted tungstated zirconia. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 247, 88–98. [Google Scholar]
  255. Solymosi, F.; Zakar, T.S. FT-IR study on the interaction of CO2 with H2 and hydrocarbons over supported Re. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 235, 260–266. [Google Scholar]
  256. Datka, J.; Kozyra, P. TPD–IR studies of CO desorption from zeolites CuY and CuX. J. Mol. Struct. 2005, 744–747, 991–996. [Google Scholar]
  257. Akcay, M. FT-IR spectroscopic investigation of the adsorption pyridine on the raw sepiolite and Fe-pillared sepiolite from Anatolia. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 694, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  258. Taranenko, N.; Pierre, J.; Stokes, D.; Vo-Dinh, T. Surface-Enhanced Raman Detection of Nerve Agent Simulant (DMMP and DIMP) Vapor on Electrochemically Prepared Silver Oxide Substrates. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1996, 27, 379–384. [Google Scholar]
  259. Tevault, D.E.; Pellenbarg, R.E. Measurement of atmospheric pollutants by Raman spectroscopy. Sci. Tot. Environ. 1988, 73, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
  260. Creasy, W.R.; Rodríguez, A.A.; Stuff, J.R.; Warren, R.W. Atomic emission detection for the quantitation of trimethylsilyl derivatives of chemical-warfare-agent related compounds in environmental samples. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 709, 333–344. [Google Scholar]
  261. Eiceman, G.A.; Nazarov, E.G.; Stone, J.A. Chemical standards in ion mobility spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 493, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  262. Tabrizchi, M. Temperature effects on resolution in ion mobility spectrometry. Talanta 2004, 62, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  263. Dworzanski, J.P.; Kim, M.; Snyder, A.P.; Arnold, N.S.; Meuzelaar, H.L. Performance advances in ion mobility spectrometry through combination with high speed vapor sampling, preconcentration and separation techniques. Anal. Chim. Acta 1994, 293, 219–235. [Google Scholar]
  264. Urbasand, A.A.; Harrington, P.B. Two-dimensional wavelet compression of ion mobility spectra. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 446, 391–410. [Google Scholar]
  265. Karpas, Z.; Pollevoy, Y. Ion mobility spectrometric studies of organophosphorus compounds. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 259, 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  266. Kanu, A.B.; Haigh, P.E.; Hill, H. Surface detection of chemical warfare agent simulants and degradation products. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 553, 148–159. [Google Scholar]
  267. Suenram, R.D.; Lovas, F.J.; Plusquellic, D.F.; Lesarri, A.; Kawashima, Y.; Jensen, J.O.; Samuels, A.C. Fourier transform microwave spectrum and ab initio study of dimethyl methylphosphonate. J. Mol. Spec. 2002, 211, 110–118. [Google Scholar]
  268. Du, X.; Ying, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, T.; Xie, G. Synthesis and evaluation of a new polysiloxane as SAW sensor coatings for DMMP detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2008, 134, 409–413. [Google Scholar]
  269. Nimal, A.T.; Mohan, S.; Mittal, U.; Yadava, R.D. A comparative analysis of one-port Colpitt and two-port Pierce SAW oscillators for DMMP vapour sensing. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 114, 316–325. [Google Scholar]
  270. Mascaro, D.J.; Baxter, J.C.; Halvorsen, A.; White, K.; Scholz, B.; Schulz, D.L. ChemiBlock transducers. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 120, 353–361. [Google Scholar]
  271. Ying, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Du, X.; Xie, G.; Yu, J.; Wang, G. PVDF coated quartz crystal microbalance sensor for DMMP vapour detection. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2007, 125, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  272. Zuo, G.; Li, X.; Li, P.; Yang, T.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Feng, S. Detection of trace organophosphorous vapour with a self-assembled bilayer functionalized SiO2 microcantilever piezoresistive sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 580, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  273. Riebel, S.; Stier, A.; Voigt, M.; Rapp, M. Influence of phase position on the performance of chemical sensors based on SAW device oscillators. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5190–5197. [Google Scholar]
  274. Levit, N.; Pestov, D.; Tepper, G. High surface area polymer coatings for SAW-based chemical sensor applications. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 82, 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  275. Lewis, N.S. Comparisons between mammalian and artificial olfaction based on arrays of carbon black-polymer composite vapour detectors. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 663–672. [Google Scholar]
  276. Dai, L.M.; Soundarrajan, P.; Kim, T. Sensors and sensor arrays based on conjugated polymers and carbon nanotubes. Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 1753–1772. [Google Scholar]
  277. Gao, T.; Tillman, E.S.; Lewis, N.S. Detection and classification of volatile organic amines and carboxylic acids using arrays of carbon black-dendrimer composite vapour detectors. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 2904–2911. [Google Scholar]
  278. Zee, F.; Judy, J.W. Micromachined polymer-based chemical gas sensor array. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 72, 120–128. [Google Scholar]
  279. Sberveglieri, G.; Baratto, C.; Comini, E.; Faglia, G.; Ferroni, M.; Pardo, M.; Ponzoni, A.; Vomiero, A. Semiconducting tin oxide nanowires and thin films for chemical warfare agents detection. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 6156–6160. [Google Scholar]
  280. Lee, S.C.; Choi, H.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, W.S.; Huh, J.S.; Lee, D.D.; Kim, J.C. The development of SnO2- based recoverable gas sensors for the detection of DMMP. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2009, 137, 239–245. [Google Scholar]
  281. Lee, W.S.; Lee, S.C.; Lee, S.J.; Lee, D.D.; Huh, J.S.; Jun, H.K.; Kim, J.C. The sensing behaviour of SnO2-based thick-film gas sensors at a low concentration of chemical agent stimulants. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 108, 148–153. [Google Scholar]
  282. Oh, S.W.; Kim, Y.H.; Yoo, D.J.; Oh, S.M.; Park, S.J. Sensing behaviour of semiconducting metal oxides for the detection of organophosphorus compounds. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1993, 13–14, 400–403. [Google Scholar]
  283. Brunol, E.; Berger, F.; Fromm, M.; Planade, R. Detection of dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) by tin dioxide-based gas sensor: response curve and understanding of the reactional mechanism. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2006, 120, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  284. Berger, F.; Planade, R.; Chambaudet, A. Detection of DEMP vapors usion SnO2-based gas sensors: understanding of the chemical reactional mechanism. Thin Solid Films 2003, 436, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  285. Kanan, S.M.; Waghe, A.; Jensen, B.L.; Tripp, C.P. Dual WO3 based sensors toselectively detect DMMP in the presence of alcohols. Talanta 2007, 72, 401–407. [Google Scholar]
  286. Kanan, S.M.; Tripp, C.P. Synthesis, FTIR studies and sensor properties of WO3 powders. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2007, 11, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  287. Yang, Y.C.; Baker, J.A.; Ward, R.A. Decontamination of Chemical Warfare Agnents. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1729–1743. [Google Scholar]
  288. Obee, T.N.; Satyapal, S. Photocatalytic decomposition of DMMP on titania. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1998, 118, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  289. Atiqur Rahman, M.; Muneer, M.; Bahnemann, D. Phtocatalytic degradation of dimethyl terephthalate in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2003, 29, 35–50. [Google Scholar]
  290. Bender, F.; Kim, C.; Mlsna, T.; Vetelino, J.F. Characterization of a WO3 thin film chlorine sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 77, 281–286. [Google Scholar]
  291. Kim, C.S.; Lad, R.J.; Tripp, C.P. Interaction of organophosphorous compounds with TiO2 and WO3 surfaces probed by vibrational spectroscopy. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 76, 442–448. [Google Scholar]
  292. Sun, L.; Qiu, F.; Quan, B. Investigation of a new catalytic combustion-type CH4 gas sensor with low power consumption. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 66, 289–292. [Google Scholar]
  293. Niranjan, R.S.; Sainkar, S.R.; Vijayamohanan, K.; Mulla, I.S. Ruthenium: tin oxide thin film as a highly selective hydrocarbon sensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2002, 82, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  294. Chaudthary, V.A.; Mull, L.S.; Vijayamohanan, K. Synergistic sensitivity effects in surface-modified tin oxide hydrogen sensors using ruthenium and palladium oxides. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1997, 16, 1819–1821. [Google Scholar]
  295. Chaudhary, V.A.; Mulla, I.S.; Sainkar, S.R.; Belhekar, A.A.; Vijayamohanan, K. Surface-ruthenated tin oxide as a novel hydrocarbon sensor. Sens. Actuat. A 1998, 65, 197–202. [Google Scholar]
  296. Tamaki, J.; Maekawa, T.; Miura, N.; Yamazoe, N. CuO-SnO2 element for highly sensitive and selective detection of H2S. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1992, 9, 197–203. [Google Scholar]
  297. Yamaura, H.; Jinkawa, T.; Tamaki, J.; Morjiya, K.; Miura, N.; Yamazoe, N. Indium oxide-based gas sensor for selective detection of CO. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1996, 35–36, 325–332. [Google Scholar]
  298. Fruhberger, B.; Stirling, N.; Grillo, F.; Ma, G.; Ruthven, S.D.; Lad, R.J.; Frederick, B.G. Detection and quantification of nitric oxide in human breath using a semiconducting oxide based chemiresistive microsensor. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 76, 226–234. [Google Scholar]
  299. Choi, N.J.; Kwak, J.H.; Lim, Y.T.; Bahn, T.H.; Yun, K.Y.; Kim, J.C.; Huh, J.S.; Lee, D.D. Classification of chemical warfare agents using thick film gas sensor array. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2005, 108, 298–304. [Google Scholar]
  300. Kanan, S.M.; Tripp, C.P. Prefiltering strategies for metal oxide based sensors: Use of chemical displacers to selectively cleave adsorbed organophosphonates from silica surfaces. Langmuir 2002, 18, 722–728. [Google Scholar]
  301. Semancik, S.; Cavicchi, R.; Wheeler, M.C.; Tiffany, J.E.; Poirier, G.E.; Walton, R.M.; Suehle, J.; Panchapakesan, S.B.; DeVoe, D.L. Microhotplate platforms for chemical sensor research. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2001, 77, 579–591. [Google Scholar]
  302. Menzel, R.; Goschnick, J. Gradient gas sensor microarrays of on- line process controla new dynamic classification model for fast and reliable air quality assessment. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2000, 43, 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  303. Kanan, S.M.; Lu, Z.; Tripp, C.P. A comparative study of the adsorption of chloro and non-chloro conatianing organophosphonates on WO3. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 9576–9580. [Google Scholar]
  304. Kanan, S.M.; Tripp, C.P. An Infrared study of adsorbed organophosphonates on silica: a prefiltering strategy for the detection of nerve agents on metal oxide Sensors. Langmuir 2001, 17, 2213–2218. [Google Scholar]
  305. Cox, D.F.; Fryberger, T.B.; Semancik, S. Surface rexonstructions of oxygen deficient SnO2 (110). Surf. Sci. 1989, 224, 121–142. [Google Scholar]
  306. Cox, D.F.; Fryberger, T.B.; Semancik, S. Summary abstract: Oxygen-Vacancy-derived defect electronic states on the SnO2(110) surface. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1988, 6, 828–829. [Google Scholar]
  307. Semancik, S.; Cox, D.F. Fundamental characterization of clean and gas-dosed tin oxide. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1987, 12, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  308. Fryberger, T.B.; Semancik, S. Conductance response of Pd/SnO2 (110) model gas sensors to H2 and O2. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 1990, 2, 305–309. [Google Scholar]
  309. Cox, D.F.; Gryberger, T.B.; Semancik, S. Oxygen vacancies and defect electronic states on the SnO2(110)-1×1 surface. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 2072–2082. [Google Scholar]
  310. Cavicchi, R.E.; Suehle, J.S.; Chaparala, P.; Kreider, K.G.; Gaitan, M.; Semancik, S. Microhotplate gas sensor. Proceedings of the 1994 Solid State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, SC, USA; 1994; pp. 53–56. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A general schematic for SMO gas sensor devices.
Figure 1. A general schematic for SMO gas sensor devices.
Sensors 09 08158f1
Figure 2. Electrical response of sprayed SnO2 thin films vs. NO2 concentration at 350 °C working temperature. (Reprinted from reference [139] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 2. Electrical response of sprayed SnO2 thin films vs. NO2 concentration at 350 °C working temperature. (Reprinted from reference [139] with permission from Elsevier).
Sensors 09 08158f2
Figure 3. (a) Gas sensing characteristics of tungsten oxide nanoparticles to 1,000 ppm H2S, and (b) variations in response with concentration of H2S at 250 °C. (Reprinted from reference [165] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 3. (a) Gas sensing characteristics of tungsten oxide nanoparticles to 1,000 ppm H2S, and (b) variations in response with concentration of H2S at 250 °C. (Reprinted from reference [165] with permission from Elsevier).
Sensors 09 08158f3
Figure 4. SMO sensors' normalized responses to the gases of interest and corresponding LDA. (Reprinted from reference [13] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 4. SMO sensors' normalized responses to the gases of interest and corresponding LDA. (Reprinted from reference [13] with permission from Elsevier).
Sensors 09 08158f4
Figure 5. Sensor response to a three pulse sequence of methanol, t-butanol and DMMP for samples A and C based sensors. (Reprinted from reference [285] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 5. Sensor response to a three pulse sequence of methanol, t-butanol and DMMP for samples A and C based sensors. (Reprinted from reference [285] with permission from Elsevier).
Sensors 09 08158f5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanan, S.M.; El-Kadri, O.M.; Abu-Yousef, I.A.; Kanan, M.C. Semiconducting Metal Oxide Based Sensors for Selective Gas Pollutant Detection. Sensors 2009, 9, 8158-8196. https://doi.org/10.3390/s91008158

AMA Style

Kanan SM, El-Kadri OM, Abu-Yousef IA, Kanan MC. Semiconducting Metal Oxide Based Sensors for Selective Gas Pollutant Detection. Sensors. 2009; 9(10):8158-8196. https://doi.org/10.3390/s91008158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanan, Sofian M., Oussama M. El-Kadri, Imad A. Abu-Yousef, and Marsha C. Kanan. 2009. "Semiconducting Metal Oxide Based Sensors for Selective Gas Pollutant Detection" Sensors 9, no. 10: 8158-8196. https://doi.org/10.3390/s91008158

APA Style

Kanan, S. M., El-Kadri, O. M., Abu-Yousef, I. A., & Kanan, M. C. (2009). Semiconducting Metal Oxide Based Sensors for Selective Gas Pollutant Detection. Sensors, 9(10), 8158-8196. https://doi.org/10.3390/s91008158

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop