Next Article in Journal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Conventional and High Performance School Buildings in the U.S.
Previous Article in Journal
Essential Oil of Japanese Cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) Wood Increases Salivary Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Levels after Monotonous Work
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Reply

Response to Comments on Whiley Legionella Risk Management and Control in Potable Water Systems: Argument for the Abolishment of Routine Testing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 12

Health and the Environment, School of the Environment, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(1), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010103
Submission received: 10 January 2017 / Revised: 11 January 2017 / Accepted: 11 January 2017 / Published: 21 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)
I would like to thank Collins and Walker for their considered comments and for acknowledging that this is an area urgently requiring more research to improve Legionella control and management strategies [1].
I agree with Collins and Walker’s conclusion that the optimum solution would be a water system management strategy that, using an improved Legionella detection method, combines risk assessment, control measures, and routine testing. However, this is currently not an option, as a Legionella detection method that adequately represents the public health risk has not yet been identified [2].
I also suggest that the ‘zero-tolerance’ approach to Legionella utilized in many UK hospitals is an example of false confidence in the culture detection results. It demonstrates how a negative detection result may cause managers to assume their system is ‘Legionella-free’. However, as discussed in the commentary, this is not guaranteed [2].

References

  1. Collins, S.; Walker, J. Comments on whiley Legionella risk management and control in potable water systems: Argument for the abolishment of routine testing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Whiley, H. Legionella risk management and control in potable water systems: Argument for the abolishment of routine testing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 14, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Whiley, H. Response to Comments on Whiley Legionella Risk Management and Control in Potable Water Systems: Argument for the Abolishment of Routine Testing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 12. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010103

AMA Style

Whiley H. Response to Comments on Whiley Legionella Risk Management and Control in Potable Water Systems: Argument for the Abolishment of Routine Testing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 12. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(1):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Whiley, Harriet. 2017. "Response to Comments on Whiley Legionella Risk Management and Control in Potable Water Systems: Argument for the Abolishment of Routine Testing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 12" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 1: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop