Next Article in Journal
Comparison of a 10-Year Cumulative Age-Standardized Incidence Rate of Lung Cancer among Metropolitan Cities in Korea (During the 2000–2009 Period): Review of Occupational and Environmental Hazards Associated with Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Water Stress on Forest Recovery and Its Interaction with Canopy Height
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia among Inpatients via the Emergency Department: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(6), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061258

Duty of Notification and Aviation Safety—A Study of Fatal Aviation Accidents in the United States in 2015

1
Mehiläinen Airport Health Centre, 01530 Vantaa, Finland
2
Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
3
Center for Human Identification, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA
4
Mehiläinen Kielotie Health Centre, 01730 Vantaa, Finland
5
Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, 33100 Tampere, Finland
6
Fimlab Laboratories, 33100 Tampere, Finland
7
NASA’s Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 94035, USA
8
Occupational and Aviation Medicine, University of Otago, 6242 Wellington, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 April 2018 / Revised: 6 June 2018 / Accepted: 11 June 2018 / Published: 13 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Issues in Occupational Safety and Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [893 KB, uploaded 13 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

After the Germanwings accident, the French Safety Investigation Authority (BEA) recommended that the World Health Organization (WHO) and European Community (EC) develop clear rules for the duty of notification process. Aeromedical practitioners (AMEs) face a dilemma when considering the duty of notification and conflicts between pilot privacy and public and third-party safety. When balancing accountability, knowledge of the duty of notification process, legislation and the clarification of a doctor’s own set of values should be assessed a priori. Relatively little is known of the magnitude of this problem in aviation safety. To address this, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) database was searched to identify fatal accidents during 2015 in the United States in which a deceased pilot used a prescribed medication or had a disease that potentially reduced pilot performance and was not reported to the AME. Altogether, 202 finalized accident reports with toxicology were available from (the year) 2015. In 5% (10/202) of these reports, the pilot had either a medication or a disease not reported to an AME which according to the accident investigation was causal to the fatal accident. In addition, the various approaches to duty of notification in aviation in New Zealand, Finland and Norway are discussed. The process of notification of authorities without a pilot’s express permission needs to be carried out by using a guidance protocol that works within legislation and professional responsibilities to address the pilot and the public, as well as the healthcare provider. Professional guidance defining this duty of notification is urgently needed. View Full-Text
Keywords: accountability; duty of notification; aeromedical practitioners; fatal accident; aviation; safety accountability; duty of notification; aeromedical practitioners; fatal accident; aviation; safety
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vuorio, A.; Budowle, B.; Sajantila, A.; Laukkala, T.; Junttila, I.; Kravik, S.E.; Griffiths, R. Duty of Notification and Aviation Safety—A Study of Fatal Aviation Accidents in the United States in 2015. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1258.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top