Next Article in Journal
Relationships between Motor Proficiency and Academic Performance in Mathematics and Reading in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Risk of Appendicitis among Children with Different Piped Water Supply: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph15081602
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Population Growth in Chinese Floodplains from 1990 to 2015

by
Yongqiang Fang
1,
Shiqiang Du
1,2,*,
Paolo Scussolini
2,
Jiahong Wen
1,
Chunyang He
3,
Qingxu Huang
3 and
Jun Gao
1,4
1
Department of Geography, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Shanghai 200234, China
2
Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes & Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
4
Institute of Urban Studies, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Shanghai 200234, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(8), 1602; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081602
Submission received: 17 June 2018 / Revised: 24 July 2018 / Accepted: 27 July 2018 / Published: 28 July 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Although China suffers from frequent and disastrous floods, the spatiotemporal pattern of its population living in the floodplain (PopF) is still unknown. This strongly limits our understanding of flood risk and the effectiveness of mitigation efforts. Here we present the first quantification of Chinese PopF and its dynamics, based on newly-available population datasets for years 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2015 and on a flood map. We found that the PopF in 2015 was 453.3 million and accounted for 33.0% of the total population, with a population density 3.6 times higher than outside floodplains. From 1990 to 2015, the PopF increased by 1.3% annually, overwhelmingly faster than elsewhere (0.5%). A rising proportion (from 53.2% in 1990 to 55.6% in 2015) of the PopF resided in flood zones deeper than 2 m. Moreover, the PopF is expected to increase rapidly in the coming decades. We also found the effect of flood memory on controlling PopF growth and its decay over time. These findings imply an exacerbating flood risk in China, which is concerning in the light of climate change and rapid socioeconomic development.

1. Introduction

Flood exposure refers to people, infrastructure, housing, production capacities, and other human assets that are located in floodplains [1,2]. It is therefore a result of the combination of physical environment (i.e., the geographical extent of the hazard) and socioeconomic factors (e.g., distribution of population and assets) [3,4,5]. Population in floodplain (PopF) is an important component of flood exposure [6,7]; its variation is increasingly considered as a major driver of disastrous flood consequences [1,8,9,10]. The global PopF of a 100-year return period flood, i.e., which is expected to occur once per century, increased approximately twofold from 1970 to 2010 [10]. Even in countries with a long tradition of flood management, like the Netherlands, PopF increased dramatically in the last decades [11]. Monitoring changes in PopF is thus essential for understanding the dynamics of flood risk at all scales [12,13,14].
China is one of the countries that most suffer from disastrous floods [1,15,16,17]. Between 1990 and 2015, a total of 162 riverine floods occurred in China, aggregately killing 23,990 people and affecting 1.7 billion, with a total economic loss of 191 billion USD [18]. On the other hand, China has been experiencing unprecedented socioeconomic development since the late 1970s, with an average annual GDP growth of 9.7% between 1990 and 2015 [19]. It is reasonable to hypothesize that this has accelerated floodplain development and led to PopF growth [20,21]. Assessing PopF dynamics becomes more important for managing flood risk and promoting society sustainability because the PopF amount primarily determines a region’s flood protection level in China [22].
Most previous studies have provided regional estimations of the PopF in China. For example, Zhang et al. [23] found that population grew rapidly by 129,900 or 33.6% during 1990–2005 in the Jingjiang flood diversion area of the middle Yangtze River basin. Based on a historical flood database, Huang et al. [24] found that more than 40% of the total 2010 population of Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai would be exposed to the most extreme floods of the period 1644–1949. Wang et al. [25] revealed a significant increasing trend in the exposed population during 1984–2011 in the Jiangsu Province. Liang et al. [12] found that, during 1990–2010, population increased in Chinese counties that showed a significant increasing trend in rainstorm frequency.
However, a national-scale study of PopF is still to be accomplished in China for two major reasons. First, a national scale floodplain map was not available [26]. In previous studies, floodplains were approximated by flood diversion areas [23], historically affected counties [24,25], or areas with a certain rainstorm frequency [12]. However, flood diversion areas are only a small portion of floodplains in China. Regarding historically flooded counties, their PopFs are generally different from the total population because a county is typically not homogeneously prone to floods. Moreover, population in rainstorm-prone counties is hardly a reliable indicator of PopF because rainstorm is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition to induce floods, especially in the context of the very large river systems in China, where floods may manifest downstream and vary from sites of most intense rainstorm. Second, a reliable space-explicit dataset of population in China was previously scarce [27]. Previous studies mainly employed county-level census data for analyzing PopF but ignored the unequal distribution of population within counties.
A national-scale PopF analysis is now feasible because of two recently released datasets. First, a global flood map produced by the CIMA foundation [28] has the adequate resolution to represent floodplains in China. Second, the China Temporal Datasets of Harvard Dataverse was released by the WorldPop program [29]. This dataset is suitable for analyzing population change across time and has been applied, e.g., to analyze farmland transition and grain production [30]. This study assesses the patterns and dynamics of PopF in China during 1990–2015 by using these two datasets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

To characterize the floodplain, we employed a riverine flood depth map with a 100-year return period and a spatial resolution of 1 km. It was provided by the CIMA foundation and is publicly accessible from the Global Risk Data Platform (http://preview.grid.unep.ch/). This dataset was produced based on regional river flow frequency analysis and hydrodynamic models, and validated against historical floods [28]. It has been used for analyzing global flood risk [1] and studying floodplain urbanization in China [21]. Flood areas are mainly distributed in the middle and lower reaches of large rivers in eastern part (Figure 1a), which are also the most populous areas in China (Figure 1b).
To represent the exposed population, we adopted the China Temporal Dataset of Harvard Dataverse, which was produced by the WorldPop program [29] and is accessible at http://www.worldpop.org.uk. This population density dataset was disaggregated from county-level population census data to a grid level by a random forest regression and dasymetric mapping technique. It was validated against census data at township scale. This dataset temporally covers 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2015. It originally had a spatial resolution of 100 m and was aggregated to 1 km resolution to match the flood map. Because this dataset did not include Tibet, we filled this gap with the gridded population of the world, version 4 (GPWv4) [31].
To evaluate the quality of the CTDHD data, a township level census data of 2010 was employed, which was released from the Population Census Office of China [32]. It is the most detailed dataset that is publicly accessible. At the township level, the CTDHD and the Population Census Office data are strongly correlated (R2 = 0.88, p < 0.001), which is consistent with the data producer’s accuracy report (R2 = 0.85, 0.88, and 0.86 for 1990, 2000, and 2010, respectively). In contrast, the GPWv4 [31] and the Landscan [33], two popular global scale gridded population data, have much weaker correlation with the Population Census Office data, R2 = 0.81 and R2 = 0.72, respectively. Therefore, the CTDHD population dataset is more reliable for China than the widely used global data GPWv4 and Landscan.

2.2. Calculate PopF and Its Indices

Floodplain was defined as the maximum extent (or flood depth > 0 m) of the 100-year flood (Figure 1a), which is consistent with the flood risk assessment by Shi and Roger [34] and the flood exposure analysis by Jongman, et al. [10] and Du, et al. [21]. PopF was then calculated by overlaying the floodplain and the population datasets using ArcGIS 10.3 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA).
To describe the patterns of PopF, we used Equation (1) to calculate the PopF density, which is the ratio of PopF to the area of floodplain (FP) in a spatial unit i:
PopF   density ( i ) = PopF FP
Similarly, we also calculated the population density outside the floodplain. In addition, the annual growth rate was calculated for PopF and population outside floodplain during 1990–2015 following Equation (2):
annual   growth   rate ( % ) = ( x t 2 x t 1 ( t 2 − t 1 ) − 1 ) × 100
where xt1 and xt2 refer to the PopF or to the population outside the floodplain in years t1 and t2, respectively.

2.3. Analyzing PopF at Multiple Scales

We analyzed the patterns and changes of PopF at three scales, i.e., country, region, and urban agglomeration. To recognize regional differences in geography and socioeconomic conditions, a delineation of eight regions was employed according to the Coordinated Regional Development Strategy and Policy Reports of China [35]: Northern Coastal China (NCC), Eastern Coastal China (ECC), Southern Coastal China (SCC), Middle Yangtze River (MYT), Middle Yellow River (MYL), Northeast China (NEC), Northwest China (NWC), and Southwest China (SWC) [36] (Figure 1a). Additionally, we analyzed the PopF and its changes in the three primary urban agglomerations in China [37]: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta (Figure 1b).

3. Results

3.1. Population in the Floodplain in 2015

The 100-year floodplain covers 12.1% (or 1.1 million km2) of land area in China, exposing 33.0% of the population of 2015, or 453.3 million people. The density of PopF is on average 396 people/km2, 3.6 times of that outside floodplains (111 people/km2).
The PopF shows high spatial heterogeneity (Table 1, Figure 2). A majority (72.6%, or 328.9 million) of the national PopF is located in NCC, ECC, SCC, and MYT, which only account for 35.5% of China’s floodplain. The average PopF density of these four regions is 810 people/km2, two times of the national average; in contrast, the PopF density for the other four regions is only 169 people/km2, or 42.6% of the national average (396 people/km2). The region with the highest PopF density (1304 people/km2) is SCC, accounting for 12.6% of China’s PopF but for only 3.8% of the floodplain area.
The PopF is further concentrated in the three primary urban agglomerations (Figure 2). The urban agglomerations jointly host a PopF of 136.5 million, accounting for 30.1% of the PopF in China; in contrast, they only have 9.2% of China’s total floodplains. The PopF density is as high as 1292 people/km2, or 3.3 times of the national average.

3.2. Changes in PopF between 1990 and 2015

The total PopF in China increased by 38.8% from 326.5 million in 1990 to 453.3 million in 2015. The annual PopF growth was 1.3%, while the population outside floodplain only increased by 0.5% annually (Table 1). As a result, the ratio of PopF to China’s total population increased from 28.6% in 1990 to 33.0% in 2015. Moreover, PopF boomed uniformly across different flood depths (Figure 3). In the zones with flood depths larger than 2 m, where damage ratio is high and can range from 41–100% [11], the PopF grew even faster and its ratio to the total PopF increased from 53.2% in 1990 to 55.6% in 2015.
A majority (82.4% or 104.5 million) of the PopF growth occurred in NCC, ECC, SCC, and MYT (Figure 4). The annual growth rate of the PopF in the four regions was 1.5%, higher than the national average of 1.3%. Particularly, SCC and ECC experienced a PopF growth of 33.4 million and 32.5 million and an annual growth rate of 3.6% and 1.7%, respectively. NWC and SWC also experienced high annual growth rates of 1.8% and 1.5%, respectively; in contrast, the PopF only increased by 0.3% and 0.5% annually in MYL and NEC, respectively. A large portion of the PopF growth (59.0 million people, 46.5% of the total PopF increase in China) was further clustered in the three primary urban agglomerations (Figure 4), where the annual growth rate was 2.3%, significantly higher than the national average (1.3%).

3.3. Heterogeneous Trends of PopF during the Last Decades

Demographic changes in China’s floodplain were not uniform during the study period (Figure 5). While the annual growth rate of total population decreased from 0.9% during the 1990s to 0.4% during the 2010s (2010–2015), the PopF followed a different evolution: it grew faster in the 1990s and 2010s (both 1.7% annually) than in the 2000s (0.8% annually). By contrast, the population growth rate outside the floodplain slightly increased from 0.6% in the 1990s to 0.7% in 2000s and then dropped to −0.2% in the 2010s.
At the regional scale, PopF growth slowed down from 1990s to 2000s in six of the eight regions, but accelerated in NCC and ECC. Most prominently, the annual growth rate of PopF decreased in SWC from 2.4% during 1990s to −0.2% during 2000s and in MYT from 1.6% to 0.1%. However, the 2010s witnessed an accelerated PopF growth in five of the eight regions, except NEC, NCC, and MYL. By contrast, the PopF in the three primary urban agglomerations of BTH, YRD, and PRD maintained a high growth rate across all the three periods, even consistently accelerating from 2.2% in 1990s to 2.4% in 2010s.

4. Discussion

4.1. PopF Growth and Its Connection to Flood Risk

The fast PopF growth aggravates flood risk in three ways. First, PopF growth directly increases flood exposure [11]. In our study, PopF boomed across different flood depths uniformly. With a rising proportion (from 53.2% in 1990 to 55.6% in 2015) of the PopF residing in the zones exposed to floods deeper than 2 m, huge potential flood damage and exacerbating flood risk are estimated for China. Second, the rising share of PopF to total population (from 28.6% in 1990 to 33.0% in 2015) can compromise the capacity to cope with flood damage and exacerbate the post-disaster need of relief resources, intervention, and recovery assistance [11]. Particularly, PopF growth will aggravate flood risk in northwest China because its flood defense systems are relatively poor [20,38]. Third, the PopF growth can also aggravate flood risk because floodplain development alters ecological systems and hampers their flood regulation function [39]. For example, the rapid growth of PopF in middle Yangtze River reaches caused lakes to shrink, with negative consequences for flood control [39].
According to the ‘World Population Prospects: the 2017 Revision’ [40], the total population in China can reach 1.5 billion in 2030. If the proportion of PopF to total population in 2030 is similar to that in 2015, the PopF will increase by approximately 45.3 million, or by 10.0%, from 2015 to 2030. If the proportion of PopF to total population continues to rise linearly, then the PopF will grow by 74.3 million, or 16.4% during 2015–2030. Therefore, there will potentially be an exacerbating flood risk in China if the rapid PopF growth is not properly controlled.

4.2. Policy Implications

A review of relevant policies (Table 2) reveals that China has nearly considered all possible measures to control floods. Specifically, authorities at multiple scales built dams and levees, established flood diversion zones, relocated people, restored and protected wetlands, and required integration of flood control into urban planning [21,41,42,43,44]. However, the fast PopF growth hints that not all the measures have been effectively implemented. A survey in 2013 [38] even found that 50% (or 321) of the 642 Chinese cities did not reach the required flood control standards; moreover, 44% (or 284) of the cities did not complete or update flood control plans, increasing from a number of 170 cities in 2006. Neglecting to upgrade flood protection reduces the cost of floodplain development, therefore increasing PopF and aggravating flood risk. Given that the flood protection level of a Chinese region is primarily determined by its PopF amount [22], flood protection systems should be adjusted to reflect PopF dynamics.
Moreover, all the PopF control efforts were further hampered by a lack of flood hazard maps at a national scale [26]. Without flood hazard maps, policy makers may not be aware of flood risk. This can even lead to policies increasing PopF growth as a side effect. For example, the “population relocation project for poverty alleviation” policy (2008), which mainly aimed to relocate residents of poverty from mountainous areas to flat areas to alleviate their poverty, may partially explain the PopF increase in northwest and southwest China from 2010 to 2015. In 2011, the “China’s National Plan of Integrated Disaster Prevention and Reduction (2011–2015)” required to produce flood hazard maps at different scales, which will play a vital role for an effective control of PopF growth in the future. We further recommend making the maps publicly accessible to enable public participation and raise risk awareness.
The slowdown of PopF growth in the 2000s suggests that flood memory had played a role. Memory of disastrous floods can dramatically increase risk awareness and influence decision making [45]. After the disastrous flood of 1998, several policies were released to mitigate flood hazard [41] (Table 2). Policies of 1999 included “convert farmland back to lake”, “removing polder dykes for floodwaters”, and “relocating people of polders to new towns” [46,47,48] (Table 2). In Yangtze River Basin alone, these policies have relocated at least 2.4 million PopFs to adjacent villages on higher land [48]. From our results, these policies seem to have achieved an effect during the 2000s, as PopF growth decreased in six of the eight regions. However, this flood memory effect seems to have dissipated over time, as China’s PopF growth rate accelerated again after 2010 at both national and regional scales. Therefore, risk education and awareness should be enhanced to counteract the declining flood memory, which also links with the accessibility of flood hazard maps.

4.3. Uncertainty and Future Perspectives

Population distribution maps with high resolution are critical for flood exposure analysis. Dasymetric mapping has been widely applied to disaggregate population data from census unit into a grid level [6,49]. However, uncertainties are inevitable in the disaggregated population data. Although it fits census data better than Landscan and GPWv4, the China Temporal Datasets of Harvard Dataverse (CTDHD) is no exception. We hope population distribution data can be further improved with the development of open source data and volunteered geographic information, e.g., the OpenStreetMap [50]. Uncertainty is also associated with the flood map. We expect that the flood map can be further improved by incorporating flood defense data into analyses and by reinforcing flood models [28,51]. In line with recent development of large-scale flood modeling, output from multiple models should be analyzed in the future to provide an estimation of uncertainties that originate from different model setups and assumptions [52]. To control uncertainties, we presented results at the macro scales (i.e., country, the eight regions, and urban agglomerations) rather than at a grid level. Therefore, our main findings should be robust towards the uncertainties of the employed data. Additionally, the PopF analysis should be extended by looking at the future, when variations are expected in population distribution, due to socioeconomic development [1,10,16], and in flood hazard, due to climate change [51].

5. Conclusions

The paper revealed a concentration of the population in floodplains (PopF) in China and its rapid growth between 1990 and 2015, according to the most updated population dataset and flood map. First, PopF accounted for 33.0% (or 453.3 million) of China’s total population with a population density 3.6 times of that outside floodplains. Second, PopF grew substantially faster (annually 1.3%) than elsewhere and accelerated recently. Third, a rising proportion (from 53.2% in 1990 to 55.6% in 2015) of the PopF was exposed to floods deeper than 2 m. Fourth, the PopF is expected to increase by another 10.0–16.4% from 2015 to 2030. The rapid PopF growth suggests an exacerbating flood risk in China and the need to adjust the flood protection system accordingly. Flood maps at different scales should be developed and made publicly accessible to enable devising local-scale risk reduction and PopF control strategies. Moreover, we detected the effect of flood memory on policy, but also its dissipation in time. This phenomenon could be addressed by raising awareness of citizens and stakeholders to flood risk.

Author Contributions

S.D. designed the study. Y.F. and S.D. performed the analyses. Y.F.; S.D. and P.S. wrote the paper together. J.W., C.H., Q.H., and J.G. reviewed, revised, and enhanced the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41730642, 51761135024, and 41401603) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1503001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). Making Development Sustainable: The Future of Disaster Risk Management (Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction); UNISDR: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Visser, H.; Petersen, A.C.; Ligtvoet, W. On the relation between weather-related disaster impacts, vulnerability and climate change. Clim. Chang. 2014, 125, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Birkmann, J.; Welle, T.; Solecki, W.; Lwasa, S.; Garschagen, M. Boost resilience of small and mid-sized cities. Nature 2016, 537, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Opperman, J.J.; Galloway, G.E.; Fargione, J.; Mount, J.F.; Richter, B.D.; Secchi, S. Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Science 2009, 326, 1487–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Di Baldassarre, G.; Viglione, A.; Carr, G.; Kuil, L.; Salinas, J.L.; Blöschl, G. Socio-hydrology: Conceptualising human-flood interactions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17, 3295–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Freire, S.; Aubrecht, C. Integrating population dynamics into mapping human exposure to seismic hazard. Nat. Hazard Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 12, 3533–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Fruh-Muller, A.; Wegmann, M.; Koellner, T. Flood exposure and settlement expansion since pre-industrial times in 1850 until 2011 in north Bavaria, Germany. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2015, 15, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Winsemius, H.C.; Aerts, J.C.J.H.; van Beek, L.P.H.; Bierkens, M.F.P.; Bouwman, A.; Jongman, B.; Kwadijk, J.C.J.; Ligtvoet, W.; Lucas, P.L.; van Vuuren, D.P.; et al. Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bouwer, L.M. Have Disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2011, 92, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jongman, B.; Ward, P.J.; Aerts, J.C.J.H. Global exposure to river and coastal flooding: Long term trends and changes. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Moel, H.; Aerts, J.C.J.H.; Koomen, E. Development of flood exposure in the Netherlands during the 20th and 21st century. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liang, P.J.; Xu, W.; Ma, Y.J.; Zhao, X.J.; Qin, L.J. Increase of Elderly Population in the Rainstorm Hazard Areas of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qiang, Y.; Lam, N.S.N.; Cai, H.; Zou, L. Changes in Exposure to Flood Hazards in the United States. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 2017, 107, 1332–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tanoue, M.; Hirabayashi, Y.; Ikeuchi, H. Global-scale river flood vulnerability in the last 50 years. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Y.; Gao, C.; Wang, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhai, J.; Li, X.; Su, B. Temporal and Spatial Variation of Exposure and Vulnerability of Flood Disaster in China. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2014, 10, 391–398. [Google Scholar]
  16. Güneralp, B.; Güneralp, İ.; Liu, Y. Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Global Environ. Chang. 2015, 31, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, B. The Effects of Floods on the Incidence of Bacillary Dysentery in Baise (Guangxi Province, China) from 2004 to 2012. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Guha-Sapair, D.; Below, R.; Hoyois, P. EM-DAT: International Disaster Database. Available online: www.emdat.be (accessed on 13 January 2018).
  19. World Bank. GDP Growth (Annual %). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=CN (accessed on 14 May 2018).
  20. Yu, K. Capitalizing on foothills: Restoring the relationship between people and land. Harvard Int. Rev. 2012, 31, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  21. Du, S.; He, C.; Huang, Q.; Shi, P. How did the urban land in floodplains distribute and expand in China from 1992–2015? Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. Standard for Flood Control (GB50201-2014); Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China: Beijing, China, 2014.
  23. Zhang, H.; Yang, X.; Wang, X.; Yu, R. Research on Population Spatial Distribution and Driving Mechanics in Jingjiang Flood Diversion Area. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2007, 9, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, H.; Cui, Y.; Ye, Y.; Fang, X. Exposure of GDP and Population under the scenarios of Historical extreme flood years in Jiangsu-Zhejang-Shanghai area. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2013, 22, 801–807. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tong, J. Spatial-temporal Characteristics of Exposure and Vulnerability to Flood Disaster in Jiangsu Province. J. Yangtze River Sci. Res. Inst. 2016, 33, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yin, J.; Ye, M.; Yin, Z.; Xu, S. A review of advances in urban flood risk analysis over China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2014, 29, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. He, C.; Huang, Q.; Dou, Y.; Tu, W.; Liu, J. The population in China’s earthquake-prone areas has increased by over 32 million along with rapid urbanization. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rudari, R.; Silvestro, F.; Campo, L.; Rebora, N.; Boni, G.; Herold, C. Improvement of the Global Food Model for the GAR 2015; United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), Centro Internazionale in Monitoraggio Ambientale (CIMA), UNEP GRID-Arendal (GRID-Arendal): Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; p. 69. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gaughan, A.E.; Stevens, F.R.; Huang, Z.; Nieves, J.J.; Sorichetta, A.; Lai, S.; Ye, X.; Linard, C.; Hornby, G.M.; Hay, S.I.; et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of population in mainland China, 1990 to 2010. Sci. Data 2016, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ge, D.; Long, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, T. Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China. Land Use Policy 2018, 70, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Center for International Earth Science Information Network. Gridded Population of the World; Version 4 (GPWv4), Population Density; NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC): New York, NY, USA. Available online: https://doi.org/10.7927/H4NP22DQ (accessed on 18 October 2017).
  32. Wu, K.; Long, Y.; Mao, Q.; Liu, X. Featured graphic. Mushrooming Jiedaos, growing cities: An alternative perspective on urbanizing China. Environ. Plan. A 2015, 47, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bright, E.A.; Coleman, P.R.; Rose, A.N.; Urban, M.L. LandScan 2010, 2010 ed.; Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2011.
  34. Shi, P.; Roger, K. World Atlas of Natural Disaster Risk; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Development Research Center of the State Council of China. Coordinated Regional Development Strategy and Policy Reports; Development Research Center of the State Council of China: Beijing, China, 2005. (In Chinese)
  36. Ma, Q.; He, C.; Wu, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Z. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban impervious surfaces in China: An improved assessment using nighttime light data. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 130, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fang, C.; Bao, C.; Ma, H. China’s Urban Agglomeration Development Report 2016; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cheng, X.T.; Li, C.C. The evolution trend, key features and countermeasures of urban flood risk. China Flood Drought Manag. 2015, 25, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  39. Xie, C.; Huang, X.; Mu, H.Q.; Yin, W. Impacts of Land-Use Changes on the Lakes across the Yangtze Floodplain in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3669–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Population Division of United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zong, Y.; Chen, X. The 1998 Flood on the Yangtze, China. Nat. Hazards 2000, 22, 165–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Du, Y.; Xue, H.; Wu, S.; Ling, F.; Xiao, F.; Wei, X. Lake area changes in the middle Yangtze region of China over the 20th century. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 1248–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yu, F.; Chen, Z.; Ren, X.; Yang, G. Analysis of historical floods on the Yangtze River, China: Characteristics and explanations. Geomorphology 2009, 113, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bryan, B.A.; Gao, L.; Ye, Y.; Sun, X.; Connor, J.D.; Crossman, N.D.; Stafford-Smith, M.; Wu, J.; He, C.; Yu, D.; et al. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature 2018, 559, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bhattacharya-Mis, N.; Lamond, J. Socio-economic Complexities of Flood Memory in Building Resilience: An Overview of Research. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2014, 18, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, G.; Zhu, C.; Chang, S. Yangtze Conservation and Development Report 2011; Changjiang Press: Wuhan, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen, Y.; Jessel, B.; Fu, B.; Yu, X.; Pittock, J. Ecosystem Services and Management Strategy in China; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pittock, J.; Xu, M. Controlling Yangtze River Floods: A New Approach; World Resources Report: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wu, J.D.; Wang, C.L.; He, X.; Wang, X.; Li, N. Spatiotemporal changes in both asset value and GDP associated with seismic exposure in China in the context of rapid economic growth from 1990 to 2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jin, X.B.; Long, Y.; Sun, W.; Lu, Y.Y.; Yang, X.H.; Tang, J.X. Process funding Evaluating cities’ vitality and identifying ghost cities in China with emerging geographical data. Cities 2017, 63, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ward, P.J.; Jongman, B.; Aerts, J.C.J.H.; Bates, P.D.; Botzen, W.J.W.; Diaz Loaiza, A.; Hallegatte, S.; Kind, J.M.; Kwadijk, J.; Scussolini, P.; et al. A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Trigg, M.A.; Birch, C.E.; Neal, J.C.; Bates, P.D.; Smith, A.; Sampson, C.C.; Yamazaki, D.; Hirabayashi, Y.; Pappenberger, F.; Dutra, E.; et al. The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 094014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 15 01602 g001 550
Figure 1. 100-year river floodplain (a) and population distribution in 2015 (b).
Figure 1. 100-year river floodplain (a) and population distribution in 2015 (b).
Ijerph 15 01602 g001
Ijerph 15 01602 g002 550
Figure 2. Density of population in the floodplain in China in 2015. Note: numbers in bracket are the average density for regions (in people/km2); refer to Figure 1 for the abbreviations of the regions.
Figure 2. Density of population in the floodplain in China in 2015. Note: numbers in bracket are the average density for regions (in people/km2); refer to Figure 1 for the abbreviations of the regions.
Ijerph 15 01602 g002
Ijerph 15 01602 g003 550
Figure 3. Population in Chinese floodplain for different flood depths.
Figure 3. Population in Chinese floodplain for different flood depths.
Ijerph 15 01602 g003
Ijerph 15 01602 g004 550
Figure 4. The annual growth rate of population in the floodplain during 1990–2015. Note: refer to Figure 1 for the abbreviations of the regions.
Figure 4. The annual growth rate of population in the floodplain during 1990–2015. Note: refer to Figure 1 for the abbreviations of the regions.
Ijerph 15 01602 g004
Ijerph 15 01602 g005 550
Figure 5. The annual growth rate of population in the floodplain (PopF), population outside floodplain, total population, and PopF in the three primary urban agglomerations.
Figure 5. The annual growth rate of population in the floodplain (PopF), population outside floodplain, total population, and PopF in the three primary urban agglomerations.
Ijerph 15 01602 g005
Table
Table 1. Population in the floodplain (PopF) and its density in 2015 and growth during 1990–2015 in different regions of China.
Table 1. Population in the floodplain (PopF) and its density in 2015 and growth during 1990–2015 in different regions of China.
RegionPopF (million)PopF Density (people/km2)PopF Growth (million)PopF Annual Growth Rate (%)
Northern Coastal China (NCC)76.669113.20.8
Eastern Coastal China (ECC)93.3119132.51.7
Southern Coastal China (SCC)57.1130433.43.6
Middle Yangtze River (MYT)101.958825.41.2
Middle Yellow River (MYL)53.02924.10.3
Northeast China (NEC)24.01902.80.5
Northwest China (NWC)11.1334.01.8
Southwest China (SWC)36.339011.51.5
China453.3396126.81.3
Table
Table 2. Major policies related to the population in floodplain (PopF) in China during 1989–2011. (Expanded from [21]).
Table 2. Major policies related to the population in floodplain (PopF) in China during 1989–2011. (Expanded from [21]).
YearPolicy/DecreeMain ContentsScaleAdministrations
1989Urban Planning Law of ChinaFlood protection measures should be implemented for areas that are prone to catastrophic floods.NationalMHURD
1998Opinions on restoring rivers and lakes and reinforcing flood defense system after Great Flood of 1998“Convert farmland back to lake”, “removing polder dykes for floodwaters”, and “relocating people of polders to new towns” should be implemented to restore the drainage capacity of the river-lake system and to reduce flood risk.RegionalMWR, MCA, MHURD
1998China’s National Disaster Reduction Plan (1998–2010)Hydraulic projects should be constructed for comprehensive disaster reduction; core cities should construct flood protections.NationalMHURD, MCA, MWR
1999Report on “convert farmland back to lake” and “removing polder dykes for floodwaters” in Yangtze River basinAccomplishing “convert farmland back to lake”, “removing polder dykes for floodwaters”, and “relocating people of polders to new towns” in 3–5 years in Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, and Anhui provinces.RegionalMWR, MCA
2000Compensating measures for the acquisition of flood diversion areasControl the population growth in flood diversion areas and organize planned emigrationRegionalMWR, MCA
2007China’s National Plan of Integrated Disaster Reduction (2006–2010)Disaster reduction should be considered in land use, urban, and post-disaster reconstruction plans; a national integrated disaster risk map should be implemented.NationalMHURD, MCA, MWR
2008Population relocation project for poverty alleviationRelocate impoverished residents from mountainous areas to flat areas and provide them fertile lands and work opportunities to alleviate povertyRegionalNDRC
2011China’s National Plan of Integrated Disaster Prevention and Reduction (2011–2015)Hydraulic projects should be constructed and reinforced for flood prevention, particularly for middle- and small-sized rivers; disaster prevention and reduction should be integrated with regional development plans; integrated risk maps of different scales should be produced.NationalMHURD, MWR, MCA
Abbreviations: MHURD: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development; MWR: Ministry of Water Resources; MCA: Ministry of Civil Affairs; NDRC: National Development and Reform Commission.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, Y.; Du, S.; Scussolini, P.; Wen, J.; He, C.; Huang, Q.; Gao, J. Rapid Population Growth in Chinese Floodplains from 1990 to 2015. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081602

AMA Style

Fang Y, Du S, Scussolini P, Wen J, He C, Huang Q, Gao J. Rapid Population Growth in Chinese Floodplains from 1990 to 2015. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(8):1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Yongqiang, Shiqiang Du, Paolo Scussolini, Jiahong Wen, Chunyang He, Qingxu Huang, and Jun Gao. 2018. "Rapid Population Growth in Chinese Floodplains from 1990 to 2015" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 8: 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop