Next Article in Journal
Potential Factors Conditioning the Compliance to Mandatory Face Covering in the Public Space Due to SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
Wildfires as a Source of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in Soil: A Case Study from Campania Region (Italy)
Previous Article in Journal
Bacterial Community Characteristics Shaped by Artificial Environmental PM2.5 Control in Intensive Broiler Houses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Performance and Stability of the Highway Subgrades in Seismic Events, a Case Study of the Changning Earthquake, Sichuan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determination of Water-Soluble Trace Elements in the PM10 and PM2.5 of Palermo Town (Italy)

by
Daniela Varrica
* and
Maria Grazia Alaimo
Dip. Scienze della Terra e del Mare (DiSTeM), Via Archirafi 22, 90123 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(1), 724; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010724
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Environmental Risk Assessment)

Abstract

:
This study contributes to the current knowledge on the solubility of trace elements in the atmospheric particulate matter of the urban area of Palermo. Daily sample filters of PM10 and PM2.5 were collected in monitoring stations within and outside the urban area, characterized by variable traffic density. The bulk of compositions in PM10 and PM2.5 were determined by ICP-MS. The water-soluble trace elements (WSTE) and major ion components of particulate matter were determined by ICP-MS and ion chromatography, respectively. A significant difference in the metals content was observed between the samples taken in urban areas and those from suburban areas. The calculated enrichment factor highlights the high values for Cu, Mo, Sb, V, and Zn, confirming the contribution of human activities. The leaching test was applied to PM10 and PM2.5 filters and showed different behaviors and transport of metals and metalloids. The calculated leaching coefficient highlights the metals typically produced by anthropic activities, compared to those of geogenic origin, are much more soluble in water and have greater mobility. The factor analysis was used to identify the sources of water-soluble ions. The main sources are anthropic, geogenic, and sea spray. The final objective of this study is to obtain, with the aid of leaching experiments on PM2.5 and PM10 filter samples, information about the bioavailability and mobility of the different metals and metalloids that could be used as the scientific basis for public health intervention and to raise the prevention and control of heavy metal pollution in the urban environment, especially in densely populated areas.

1. Introduction

Air pollution is one of the most complex problems facing modern society now on a global level [1]. To date, attention to this phenomenon, based on many scientific studies and many awareness campaigns, has not been indifferent. Starting in 2019, the European Commission proposed a number of policy initiatives with the overall goal of achieving climate neutrality in Europe by 2050 through the European Green Deal [2]. The Zero Pollution Action Plan provides guidance for integrating pollution prevention into all relevant EU policies; it includes targets on air, water, soil, and noise pollution, as well as waste generation and biodiversity [3]. Global environmental pollution, together with the environmental damage it causes, such as the contamination and depletion of many natural resources, is considered a problem due to its adverse effects on human health [4]. Pollutants dispersed in the air, water, and soils come into direct contact with humans, and if ingested or inhaled, they can likely become part of the metabolic cycles causing very serious pathologies as well as genetic mutations [5,6].
Pathologies associated with the atmospheric pollution phenomena are mainly allergies, asthma, autoimmune diseases, diseases of the cardiovascular system and the nervous system, as well as various types of cancer [7]. It is difficult to define a polluted atmosphere based on a standard since it is a constantly evolving reservoir; therefore, air pollution has been recognized as exceeding the limits of the different elements or chemical compounds set by law based on the risks for health and the natural environment [1].
Airborne particulate matter (PM) is considered a complex multi-component mixture generated through a variety of processes and mechanisms and emitted from numerous sources (vehicular traffic, industrial activities, power plants, domestic fuel, resuspension of dust, volcanic emissions, and sea spray aerosols). Anthropogenic sources identified in vehicular traffic are responsible for most of the urban pollution caused by the combustion processes of fossil fuels, which mainly release inorganic gases (SOx, NOx, CO), organic gas (BTX), metals and metalloids, and fine dust (PM) [7]. Exhaust system emissions of metals can arise from the burning of fuels and lubricating oils, and several studies pointed out that, e.g., Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Ni, Zn, Cr, and Ba are typical elements from these emissions. Abrasion and wear of components, such as engines, brakes, and tires, result in non-exhaust emissions from vehicles that have been found to be higher sources of Zn, Cu, Fe, Sb, and Ba. Road dust contains, in addition to deposition from the aforementioned sources, elements from soil and abrasion of the road surface (e.g., Ca, Fe, Sr, Si, trace Ti, and Mn) [8].
Furthermore, organic and inorganic secondary particles formed in the atmosphere by chemical processes involving precursor gases emitted from different sources account for a large fraction of PM fine mass [9,10].
Aerosol particles of fine dimensions are recognized as having a strong impact on the environment and having concerning health-related effects. In urban areas, air particle pollution is of particular interest for the possible delayed health effects associated with the continuous exposure to a high-density population [5,11].
A very important characteristic of atmospheric PM is related to particle size as it determines atmospheric life and pulmonary deposition. The danger of the particulate is not only expressed linearly to its quantity or size, but its chemical composition is also of fundamental importance [12,13,14,15,16]. To evaluate pollution and danger levels, information on the mass and total content of trace elements in the particulate is necessary but not sufficient because the effect of trace elements on the environment and humans depends on the form of association in the solid phase to which the elements are related [17]. Toxicological studies have associated the water-soluble fraction of the metal content with a possible harmful component of the particulate matter [18]. The potentially toxic elements of PM according to Directive 2008/50/EC [19] are As, Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb, which play a crucial role in the generation of reactive oxygen species and therefore in the adverse effects of PM [20,21,22]. To carry out a complete assessment of the potential toxic effects (and therefore the risk to human health) of PM on an area, it is necessary to determine both the elemental composition and the water-soluble fraction. Therefore, the toxicity of the elements and the risks to human health related to them are linked to their bioaccumulation capacity and consequently to their mobility [23].
Through the leaching technique, also known as solid–liquid extraction, which consists of the release of ions or soluble compounds from a solid by means of a solvent, it was possible to observe the ability of the trace elements contained in the PM filters to pass into an aqueous solution.
With the aid of leaching experiments on PM2.5 and PM10 filter samples, the objective of this study is to obtain information about the bioavailability and mobility of the different metals and metalloids released in an aqueous solution by each sample. This study contributes to current knowledge on the solubility of trace elements in the atmospheric particulate matter of the urban area of Palermo. The study of the release mechanism and speed of mobilization of trace elements, which have a higher concentration in the atmospheric particulate or those which have been leached, can serve as a material on which to base improvements for the evaluation and prediction of the behavior of fine particles in different natural environmental systems.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Area

With about 670,000 inhabitants, Palermo is the largest urban area of Sicily, and its metropolitan area is populated by more than one million people. The city (38°06′54.36″ N–13°21′02.88″ E) is situated on the north-western coast of the island along the wide bay “Piana di Palermo”, and it is delimited at the northeast by the Tyrrhenian Sea and is surrounded by mountains (Monti di Palermo) reaching 500–1000 m above sea level. The climate is typically Mediterranean with warm dry summers and moderately rainy winters. The prevailing wind directions are from east and west. The movements of the local air masses are strictly linked to topography. Normally, during the daytime, sea breezes drive the pollutants produced in the city toward the surrounding mountains. During evening and night, mountain breezes take place, which drive the polluted air masses above the city. Potential local pollutants are limited to emissions from vehicular traffic and small manufacturing industries. The study area is entirely covered by sedimentary rocks (limestone, clay, marly-clay, and white or yellow quaternary biocalcarenite) [24].

2.2. Sampling Sites

A total of 102 daily samples, 62 PM10 and 40 PM2.5, were collected during the winter months (December–February). To meet the requirements of Directive 1999/30/EC (EU Commission, 1999), PM10 sampling was performed according to European Standard EN12341 (CEN, 1998) with a low-volume system equipped with a sampling inlet head (Zambelli Explorer Plus Controller 16) operating at a constant sampling rate (2.3 m3h−1). Particles were collected on standard 47 mm quartz filters (Advantec, grade QR100). The sampling time was 24 h from midnight to midnight. Similarly, PM2.5 sampling was performed according to European standard EN 14907 (CEN, 2005). The initial and final weighings of PM10 and PM2.5 filters were carried out in a temperature- and humidity-controlled room (T = 20 ± 1 °C, RH = 50 ± 5%) after the filters had been conditioned for 48 h before and after sampling. Three air-quality-monitoring stations belonging to the municipal monitoring network (RAP-ex AMIA) were chosen for this study (Figure 1). The urban station PM2.5 (U1) is located close to a crossroads with traffic lights at pedestrian crossings and is characterized by high-traffic flow, consisting of cars, heavy-duty vehicles, and buses. The urban station PM10 (U2) is situated in a large square in front of the railway station, exposed to heavy traffic composed of cars as well as urban and regional buses. The suburban station PM10 (S1) is a background station situated leeward of the sea breeze without any direct influence from urban activities. It has a lower traffic density than the other stations and was selected as a control site to monitor the hypothetical background level of pollution.

2.3. Analytical Procedures

The PM2.5 and PM10 samples were analyzed for insoluble ions. To determine water-soluble ions, filters were placed in vials and ultrasonicated at room temperature for 24 h in 20 mL ultrapure 18 MΩ water. The extracts were filtered through a 0.45 μm pore size polytetrafluoroethylene filter (Sartorius) and then stored in sterile 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes. The pH, EC, and redox potential of the solution in the water extraction step were measured on all samples in an aliquot of the solution extract. pH measurements were carried out using a glass electrode connected to a VWR pH100-m after calibration with pH 4.01 and 7.00 buffer solutions. The electrical conductivity was measured by a VWR EC300 instrument, previously calibrated by the conductivity solution HI 70031 (HANNA). EC values are reported at 25 °C. A SenTix ORP combination Pt electrode, calibrated daily against ZoBell’s solution [25], was employed to measure redox potentials.
The remaining part was acidified to 2% HNO3 to prevent metal adsorption and stored at 4 °C for later analysis. Concentrated HNO3, HClO4, and HF acids were then added to the filters to give a 5 mL total volume of 3:1:1 v/v acid digested in a microwave. After digestion, the solutions were diluted by the addition of 18 MΩ cm deionized water to reach a volume of 50 mL.
Water-soluble ions were analyzed the day after the extraction procedure for Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl, SO42–, and NO3 ions by ion chromatography (Dionex 100), and NH4+ ions by spectrophotometer UV-Vis using Nessler’s reagent at λ = 420 nm (Thermo Scientific Evolution 600).
The limit of detection was evaluated by solution extracts for three blank filters in 0.03–0.07 and 0.03–0.05 mg L−1 for cations and anions, respectively.
Eighteen trace elements (Al, As, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sb, Sr, U, V, Zn) were measured by inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Perkin-Elmer, Elan 6100 DRC-e, SD, CA, USA) after addition of Re-Sc-Y as internal standards on a total of 102 filter samples (40 at U1, 40 at U2, 22 at S1, respectively) both for the determination of the total content and water-soluble trace elements. For As, Cr, Fe, and V the ICP-MS was operated in DRC mode with CH4 as the reaction gas. All standard solutions were prepared with ultra-pure deionized water, the ICP Multi Element Standard Solutions XXI CertiPUR, and the Mo and Sb CertiPUR standards (MERCK). In the bulk samples, to minimize the matrix effects, the standard addition technique was used for all the metal determinations; the analytical precision, estimated by carrying out several replicates, was in the range of 1–10% for all the analyzed elements, except for As and Cr, which resulted in 15%. The validity of the whole analytical procedure was checked using the NIST standard reference material Road Dust, SRM 1648. The metal recovery rates of certified elements in the reference material were between 84% and 95%, with an average value of 90%. In the water-soluble trace elements, the precision of the analytical results was estimated by running triplicate analyses every tenth sample and fell within the range of 3–12%. Accuracy (±10%) was assessed by running SRM-1640 (groundwater) and TMRAIN-95 (rainwater) reference standard materials. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) were evaluated by solution extracts from three blank filters for each element in Al (0.07 μg L−1; 0.12 μg L−1), As (0.02 μg L−1; 0.04 μg L−1), Ba (0.04 μg L−1; 0.08 μg L−1), Co (0.03 μg L−1; 0.08 μg L−1), Cr (0.04 μg L−1; 0.11 μg L−1), Cu (0.04 μg L−1; 0.08 μg L−1), Fe (0.04 μg L−1; 0.11 μg L−1), Li (0.01 μg L−1; 0.04 μg L−1), Mn (0.01 μg L−1; 0.02 μg L−1), Mo (0.05 μg L−1; 0.10 μg L−1), Ni (0.04 μg L−1; 0.07 μg L−1), Pb (0.04 μg L−1; 0.08 μg L−1), Rb (0.01 μg L−1; 0.02 μg L−1), Sb (0.004 μg L−1; 0.009 μg L−1), Sr (0.01 μg L−1; 0.04 μg L−1), U (0.001 μg L−1; 0.002 μg L−1), V (0.05 μg L−1; 0.08 μg L−1), Zn (0.05 μg L−1; 0.10 μg L−1), respectively. Analyses were carried out at Dept. Scienze della Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed statistically by the STATISTICA program (Tulsa, OK, USA), Stat-Soft version 6.0. All the tests in this study were considered significant at p < 0.05. The Shapiro–Wilk test with a level of significance set at p < 0.05 was used to verify the normality of data distribution. The non-parametric Mann–Whitney test at p < 0.05 was also used to verify the statistical significance of observed differences between PM10 filters.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Total Mass and Trace Elements

A summary of the total PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations for the urban and peripheral stations is given in Table 1.
The highest mean PM10 value was observed at the urban site (35 μg m−3), one of the most heavily traffic-exposed sites in the study area, followed by the peripheral station (16 μg m−3). In addition, the high vehicular impact on urban pollution is confirmed by the PM2.5 atmospheric particulate content, which reports an average value of 29 μg m−3. The values measured in Palermo in this study show a situation comparable to other Italian and European cities [26].
The average distribution of elemental concentrations in PM2.5 and PM10 is shown in Figure 2.
The metal and metalloid profiles have similar patterns between the two fractions. In general, the abundance of the trace elements in urban sites with a decreasing trend in PM2.5 was: Al, Fe > Ba > Zn > V > Cu > Cr > Pb, Ni > Sb > Mn > Mo > Sr > As > Rb > Li, Co > U; whereas the trend in PM10 was: Al > Fe > Zn > Cu, Ba > Pb, V > Mn, Sb > Sr, Cr > Ni > Mo > Rb > As > Li > Co > U. At the suburban station, the order of abundance for PM10 was Al > Fe > Zn > Pb, V > Cu, Ba > Mn, Ni, Sr > Cr > Sb, Rb > As > Mo, Li > Co > U.
The metals with the greatest concentrations across all sites were Al and Fe, accounting for about 70–80% of the total trace elements, indicating the significant contribution of soil and resuspended mineral dust to atmospheric PM2.5 and PM10. Other elements, such as As, Ba, Cr, Mo, Ni, and V, had higher concentrations in the PM2.5 fraction than PM10, confirming the role of anthropic processes, such as the mechanical abrasion release of the metal structures of vehicles, engine components, tires, and brake linings.

Enrichment Factor

To assess the contribution of anthropogenic emissions to atmospheric element levels within the urban area, the enrichment factor (EF) was computed as the ratio of the concentration of each element in PM samples to its average abundance in local soils. According to Varrica et al. [27], the average local soil (LS) for the studied area is considered to be made up of carbonate rocks (80%), clay minerals (10%), and “Terra Rossa” soil (10%). Aluminum was selected as a reference element. The mean EFs estimated for each element are shown in Figure 3. Based on Hernandez et al.’s considerations [28], EF values ranging between 0.5 and 2 can be considered in the range of natural variability, whereas ratios greater than 2 indicate some enrichment corresponding mainly to anthropogenic inputs.
Elements, such as Co, Fe, Li, Mn, Sr, and U, as they are known, are predominantly dominated by a crustal origin and are not enriched in relation to the local soil (LS) with an EF < 1. The figure shows some elements are particularly enriched in the fine fraction 2.5 compared to the coarse fraction. Elements, such as As, Ba, Cr, and Ni, have an enrichment with EF < 10 in PM10 samples compared to PM2.5 samples which have an EF > 10. The enrichment factor calculated for lead continues to confirm the presence of this element in atmospheric particulate matter. Cu, Mo, Sb, V, and Zn have an EF > 20 in both fractions. Particular attention should be paid to the enrichment factors of antimony with EFs calculated above 500 for both PM10 and PM2.5. The higher concentrations of these elements in urban PM reveal the fundamental contribution of human activities. The lowest EFs were observed in the suburban site for all elements analyzed.
Antimony, copper, and molybdenum are elements identified with vehicular traffic pollution released by brake wear and linings in urban environments. Their concentrations over time in urban environments have grown to impose on identifying elements of vehicular traffic. The Cu/Sb ratio in particular is used as a fingerprinting tool in identifying the contribution of road vehicles to traffic-derived PM [29,30]. Sternbeck et al. [31] proposed a typical Cu/Sb ratio of 4.6 ± 2.3, resulting from brake and lining wear release. In this study, the ratio varied between 3.9 and 4.1 at urban PM2.5 and PM10 sites, respectively. The source of molybdenum in an urban area is related to vehicle brake wear, which can contribute up to 50% of PM10 and 12% of PM2.5 emissions, respectively [32].

3.2. Leaching Test

The water-soluble trace element (WSTE) components of PM are one of the main factors responsible for PM-induced toxicity [33]. Table 2 shows the data relating to the main chemical–physical parameters measured in the leaching filters. The measured conductivity values reflect the quantities of material deposited on the filter. The measured redox potentials are similar in both PM2.5 and PM10 samples, while the PM2.5 filters show a slightly lower pH value than the PM10 filters. In all phases of the experiment, pH trend shows a tendency towards neutrality. The presence of carbonate minerals in atmospheric PM can become the main neutralizing agent [34]. Studies carried out on the pH of the rainwater in the study area have shown processes that contribute to the neutralization of rain are attributable to the contribution of marine sprays and the dissolution of carbonate rocks [35].
The leachability of heavy metals bound to atmospheric particles is strongly dependent upon chemical speciation. Since atmospheric particles at a given site generally come from different sources with varying mineralogical compositions, the contributions related to the leaching of trace elements are expected to vary between sites [36]. Table 3 shows the concentration of WSTE and major ions in the PM2.5 and PM10 samples.
The data indicate large fractions of total PM10 in urban and suburban sites (39–45% in weight, respectively) are made up of water-soluble major ions, while the soluble component in fine fraction PM2.5 is reduced to 27% in weight. The order of abundance of ionic concentrations expressed in μg m−3 shows a prevalence of the NO3 ion for anions followed by the SO42− ion in urban filters of both PM10 and PM2.5. In the peripheral station, the sulfate ion is more abundant, followed by the nitrate ion. The presence of sulfate ions in the lower atmosphere is generally assumed to be a secondary airborne particulate formed from the gas-to-particle conversion of SO2. Nitrate ions are derived from the reaction of hydroxyl radicals formed by the photolysis of ozone molecules with NOx emitted by fossil fuel combustion. The concentrations of NO3, SO42−, and NH4+ in urban environments demonstrate the presence of secondary origin particulate matter, which is formed as a result of reactions in the atmosphere between acid gases and ammonia, according to a sequence of neutralization reactions [34,37,38]. Across all sites, the most abundant cation is the Ca2+ ion, followed by the NH4+ ion in the urban stations, and the Na+ ion in the suburban site. The presence of Na+, Cl, and K+ ions in the atmospheric particulate matter indicates a geogenic origin to be identified almost exclusively from the marine spray. The ion concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the atmospheric particulate matter may derive from the alteration of carbonate rocks present in the study area, even if, for the Mg, it is not possible to exclude an identifiable component in the sea spray.
The concentration of the analyzed metals and metalloids follows the orders of abundance:
PM2.5: Fe > Zn > Ba > Cu > Sr > Mn > V > Sb > Al > Mo > Pb > Cr > Rb > Ni > As > Li > Co > U
PM10Urb: Fe > Zn > Ba > Cu > Sr > V > Mn > Sb > Al > Cr > Pb > Mo > Rb > Ni > As > Li > Co > U
PM10Suburb: Zn > Fe > Ba > Cu > Sr > V > Mn > Al > Pb > Sb > Mo > Cr > Ni > Rb > As > Li > Co > U
The differences are most evident between the suburban and the urban stations. The distributions between urban stations (PM10 and PM2.5) are similar. Some variation in the order of abundance between Mn-V and Cr-Mo-Pb is observed. By comparing the concentrations of trace elements present in the leached PM10 of urban and extra-urban stations with a non-parametric Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05), the result is differences observed for some elements, such as Ba, Cu, Fe, Pb, and Sb, are statistically significant.

3.2.1. Leaching Coefficient Rls

In this study, to evaluate the behavior and transport of the analyzed metals and metalloids, it was considered appropriate to calculate the leaching coefficient, Rls, as the ratio between the water-soluble metal and the elemental concentration associated with each of the size fractions PM10 and PM2.5. The leaching coefficient, Rls, is a significant parameter used to describe the distribution of a species between a solid and aqueous matrix after equilibrium. Figure 4 shows the leaching coefficient of the Rls distribution for metals and metalloids in the PM10 and PM2.5 size fractions.
For PM10, the Rls index was <10% for Al, Pb, Mn, V, and As and >40% for Sr. We found elements, such as Sb, Mo, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Ba, in the range of 15–35%, which is considered to be water soluble. In the PM2.5 size fraction, the Rls index < 10% was similar to the PM10 fraction for Al, As, Co, Li, Mn, Pb, Rb, and V. For Zn, Cu, Mo, Ni, and Sb, the Rls index in PM2.5 was higher than the PM10 size fractions. The element that enjoys a lower solubility is aluminum with percentages equal in the leached PM2.5 and PM10. Aluminum of a crustal origin is generally present in silicate minerals, which in a water solution with neutral pH show low solubility. From the figure, it appears the elements that have a medium-higher solubility are Ba, Cu, Mo, Ni, Sb, Sr, and Zn. The origin of these elements in atmospheric particulate matter is exclusively anthropic with the exception of strontium and barium. The high rate of leaching found in Sr and Ba is mainly linked to their crustal origin as they are present in the carbonate rocks surrounding the study area.
In general, the different solubility may depend on chemical bonds, the size of the particulate, and its origin. According to the figure, the fine fraction shows a more significant proportion of water-soluble elements for those elements of typical anthropogenic origin. In contrast, some terrigenous metals are more soluble in the PM10 fraction.
Some elements, such as Ni, Sb, and Zn, adversely affect human health. In general, the solubility of nickel in the atmospheric particulate of geogenic origin is linked to silicate minerals, which are not very soluble in water, while anthropogenic nickel compounds are mainly soluble species, such as nickel sulfate [39]. In recent years, several studies have been performed on antimony speciation as Sb(III) has been classified by AIRC as probably being carcinogenic to humans. Some speciation studies on solids have verified in the atmospheric particulate matter of both PM2.5 and PM10, antimony is mainly present as Sb(V) or mixed layers between Sb(III) and Sb(V) [40]. Several studies on the solubility of antimony have verified at high concentrations, the prevailing form is Sb(V) [41].
Although zinc is considered to be a metal with low environmental mobility [17], our study shows it is among the most soluble elements, which is in agreement with what was also observed by Manousakas et al. [42]. From these considerations, it is possible to deduce zinc is found in urban environments in the form of the soluble salt ZnSO4.
In general, it is possible to note the metals typically produced by anthropic activities, compared to those of geogenic origin, are much more soluble in water and have greater mobility. This is because the metal present in the atmospheric particulate is mainly derived from anthropic processes of abrasion of metal parts or condensing particles of hot vapor or metals that have condensed on the surface of other particles and therefore tend to be more labile than metal bound within the crustal material [18].

3.2.2. Factor Analysis

To identify the sources of water-soluble ions in the particulate, we used factor analysis (FA). The input variables were concentrations of 11 selected elements in the filter samples. The load factors of the calculated raw factors were rotated by Kaiser’s varimax rotation scheme [43].
The factorial loads obtained for the three-factor model are shown in Table 4. A factor analysis indicates approximately 72% of the variance can be explained by the first three factors. Factor 1, which shows high positive loads on Cr, Cu, Sb, and Zn elements, represents 31% of the total variance in the database. These are typical elements associated with anthropogenic factors, identified with non-exhaust vehicle emissions. The dominant elements in Factor 2 are Ca, Li, and Sr (23% of the total variance). This factor is mainly attributed to the influence of the geogenic source. The Factor 3 profile, which represents an additional 17% of the residual variance, is determined by elements such as Cl and Na. This factor is representative of the important contribution of sea spray aerosol to PM concentrations. To estimate how much sea spray contributed to the total mass of PM2.5 and PM10, the sea-salt concentration was calculated from a water-soluble Na and seawater composition [44], assuming the total marine origin of Na. The results underline a higher contribution in coarse particulate filters (24%) than in fine particulate filters (16%), with higher percentages in the suburban station.

4. Conclusions

Trace element concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 measured in the Palermo town highlight the metal and metalloid profiles have similar patterns between the two fractions. A significant difference in trace element contents was observed between the samples taken in an urban area and those from a suburban area. The metals with the greatest concentrations across all sites were Al and Fe, accounting for about 70–80% of the total trace elements, indicating the significant contribution of soil and resuspended mineral dust. Other elements, such as As, Ba, Cr, Mo, Ni, and V, had higher concentrations in the PM2.5 fraction than PM10, confirming the anthropic emissions. The enrichment factor (EF) calculated highlights the anthropogenic contribution in the study area for Cu, Mo, Sb, V, and Zn (EF > 20). The results obtained from the leaching test in two PM fractions show the different behaviors and transport of metals and metalloids. The leaching index (Rls) calculated for metals and metalloids highlights the elements with Rls index > 35% (Ba, Cu, Mo, Ni, Sb, Sr, and Zn) are exclusively anthropic sources except for Ba and Sr, which are linked to crustal origin. The sources of water-soluble ions in the particulate matter were identified by factor analysis (FA), which lead us to conclude Cr, Cu, Sb, and Zn are typical elements linked to non-exhaust vehicle emissions; Ca, Li, and Sr are identified to a geogenic source; Cl and Na represent an important contribution of sea spray to PM concentrations.
In general, it is possible to note the metals typically produced by anthropic activities, compared to those of geogenic origin, are much more soluble in water and have greater mobility as the metal present in the atmospheric particulate is mainly derived from anthropic processes. The affinity of metals for the individual phases of the mineralogical species to which they are associated and their possible origin may constitute a valid aid for the bodies responsible for implementing programs and measures to be taken for the protection of public health. This study demonstrates the determination of water-soluble trace elements in PM2.5 and PM10 is a very important tool for implementing knowledge on the mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity of trace elements depending on the chemical forms in which they occur. Together with the determination of the total concentrations of trace elements, it provides an in-depth analysis to evaluate the level of pollution in the urban environment, providing insights into developing policies for strategic management aimed at the prevention and control of heavy metal pollution in the urban environment, especially in densely populated areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.V. and M.G.A.; methodology, D.V. and M.G.A.; data curation, D.V. and M.G.A.; formal analysis, M.G.A. and D.V.; writing-original draft, D.V. and M.G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was jointly funded by FFR2021 (Varrica, D. and Alaimo, M.G.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Risorse Ambiente Palermo (RAP) (http://www.rapspa.it/site/, (accessed on 1 December 2022)) for providing us with the sample filters.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manisalidis, I.; Stavropoulou, E.; Stavropoulos, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Commitee and the Commitee of the Regions, the European Green Deal. COM (2019) 640 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
  3. Haines, A.; Scheelbeek, P. European Green Deal: A major opportunity for health improvement. Lancet 2020, 395, 1327–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Manucci, P.M.; Franchini, M. Health effects of ambient air pollution in developing countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. WHO. Air Pollution; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland; Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  7. Kampa, M.; Castanas, E. Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.M.; Jeong, C.-H.; Hilker, N.; Healy, R.M.; Sofowote, U.; Debosz, J.; Su, Y.; Munoz, A.; Evans, G.J. Quantifying metal emissions from vehicular traffic using real world emission factors. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aldabe, J.; Elustondo, D.; Santamaría, C.; Lasheras, E.; Pandolfi, M.; Alastuey, A.; Querol, X.; Santamaría, J.M. Chemical characterisation and source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 at rural, urban and traffic sites in Navarra (North of Spain). Atmos. Res. 2011, 102, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Squizzato, S.; Cazzaro, M.; Innocente, E.; Visin, F.; Hopke, P.K.; Rampazzo, G. Urban air quality in a mid-size city—PM2.5 composition, sources and identification of impact areas: From local to long range contributions. Atmos. Res. 2017, 186, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. West, J.J.; Cohen, A.; Dentener, F.; Brunekreef, B.; Zhu, T.; Armstrong, B.; Bel, M.L.; Brauer, M.; Carmichae, G.; Costa, D.L.; et al. What We Breathe Impacts Our Health: Improving Understanding of the Link between Air Pollution and Health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 4895–4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fernández Espinosa, A.J.; Rodriguez, M.T.; Barragán de la Rosa, F.J.; Sánchez, J.C.J. A chemical speciation of trace metals for fine urban particles. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valavanidis, A.; Fiotakis, K.; Vlachogianni, T. Airborne Particulate Matter and Human Health: Toxicological Assessment and Importance of Size and Composition of Particles for Oxidative Damage and Carcinogenic Mechanisms. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 2008, 26, 339–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Muránszky, G.; Óvári, M.; Virág, I.; Csiba, P.; Dobai, R.; Záray, G. Chemical characterization of PM10 fractions of urban aerosol. Microchem. J. 2011, 98, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Juda-Rezler, K.; Zajusz-Zubek, E.; Reizer, M.; Maciejewska, K.; Kurek, E.; Bulska, E.; Klejnowski, K. Bioavailability of elements in atmospheric PM2.5 during winter episodes at Central Eastern European urban background site. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 245, 117993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Swietlik, R.; Trojanowska, M. Chemical Fractionation in Environmental Studies of Potentially Toxic Particulate-Bound Elements in Urban Air: A Critical Review. Toxics 2022, 10, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dos Santos, M.; Gómez, D.; Dawidowski, L.; Gautier, E.; Smichowski, P. Determination of water-soluble and insoluble compounds in size classified airborne particulate matter. Microchem. J. 2009, 91, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Heal, M.R.; Hibbs, L.R.; Agius, R.M.; Beverland, I.J. Total and water-soluble trace metal content of urban background PM10, PM2.5 and black smoke in Edinburgh, UK. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 1417–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe. Off. J. Eur. L 2008, 152. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32008L0050 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  20. Jaishankar, M.; Tseten, T.; Anbalagan, N.; Mathew, B.B.; Beeregowda, K.N. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2014, 7, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rauf, A.U.; Mallongi, A.; Lee, K.; Daud, A.; Hatta, M.; Al Madhoun, W.; Astuti, R.D. Potentially Toxic Element Levels in Atmospheric Particulates and Health Risk Estimation around Industrial Areas of Maros, Indonesia. Toxics 2021, 9, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Szara-Bąk, M.; Baran, A.; Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A.; Tkaczewska, J.; Wojtasik, B. Mobility, ecotoxicity, bioaccumulation and sources of trace elements in the bottom sediments of the Rożnów reservoir. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2021, 43, 4701–4718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abate, B.; Catalano, R.; Renda, P.M. Schema geologico dei Monti di Palermo. Boll. Soc. Geol. It. 1978, 97, 807–819. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nordstrom, D.K. Thermochemical redox equilibria of Zobell’s solution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1977, 41, 1835–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karanasiou, A.; Viana, M.; Querol, X.; Moreno, T.; De Leeuw, F. Assessment of personal exposure to particulate air pollution during commuting in European cities. Recommendations and policy implications. Sci. Total. Environ. 2014, 490, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Varrica, D.; Dongarrà, G.; Sabatino, G.; Monna, F. Inorganic geochemistry of roadway dust from the metropolitan area of Palermo, Italy. Environ. Geol. 2003, 44, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hernandez, L.; Probst, A.; Probst, J.L.; Ulrich, E. Heavy metal distribution in some French forest soils: Evidence for atmospheric contamination. Sci. Total. Environ. 2003, 312, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Dongarrà, G.; Manno, E.; Varrica, D. Possible markers of traffic-related emissions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 154, 17–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dongarrà, G.; Manno, E.; Varrica, D.; Lombardo, M.; Vultaggio, M. Study on ambient concentrations of PM10, PM10–2.5, PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants. Trace elements and chemical speciation of atmospheric particulates. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 5244–5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sternbeck, J.; Sjodin, A.; Andreasson, K. Metal emissions from road traffic and the influence of resuspension: Results from two tunnel studies. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 4735–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wong, M.Y.; Rathod, S.D.; Marino, R.; Alaimo, M.G.; Varrica, D.; Li, L.; Howarth, R.W.; Alastuey, A.; Xu, Y.; Mahowald, N.M.; et al. Anthropogenic Perturbations to the Atmospheric Molybdenum Cycle. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2021, 35, e2020GB006787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sarti, E.; Pasti, L.; Rossi, M.; Ascanelli, M.; Pagnoni, A.; Trombini, M.; Remelli, M. The composition of PM1 and PM2.5 samples, metals, and their water soluble fractions in the Bologna area (Italy). Atmos. Poll. Res. 2015, 6, 708–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Varrica, D.; Tamburo, E.; Vultaggio, M.; Di Carlo, I. ATR–FTIR Spectral Analysis and Soluble Components of PM10 and PM2.5 Particulate Matter over the Urban Area of Palermo (Italy) during Normal Days and Saharan Events. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dongarrà, G.; Francofonte, S. Quality of rainwater: A geochemical process of water -air-rock-life interaction. Environ. Geol. 1995, 25, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mazziotti Tagliani, S.; Carnevale, M.; Armiento, G.; Montereali, M.R.; Nardi, E.; Inglessis, M.; Sacco, F.; Palleschi, S.; Rossi, B.; Silvestroni, L.; et al. Content, mineral allocation and leaching behavior of heavy metals in urban PM2.5. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 153, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, Y.; He, G.Y.; Luo, B.; Chen, J.W.; Wang, B.; Du, Y.S. Pollution characteristics of inorganic water-soluble ions in atmospheric particulate matter in Chengdu plain. Environ. Sci. 2009, 37, 2863–2870. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hong, Y.; Ma, Y.; Sun, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, N. Water-soluble ion components of PM10 during the winter-spring season in a typical polluted city in Northeast China. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2019, 26, 7055–7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Begum, W.; Rai, S.; Banerjee, S.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Mondal, M.H.; Bhattarai, A.; Saha, B. A comprehensive review on the sources, essentiality and toxicological profile of nickel. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 9139–9153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Varrica, D.; Bardelli, F.; Dongarrà, G.; Tamburo, E. Speciation of Sb in airborne particulate matter, vehicle brake linings, and brake pad wear residues. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 64, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Johnson, C.A.; Moench, H.; Wersin, P.; Kugler, P.; Wenger, C. Solubility of antimony and other elements in samples taken from shooting ranges. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Manousakas, H.; Papaefthymiou, K.; Eleftheriadis, K.; Katsanou, M. Determination of water-soluble and insoluble elements in PM2.5 by ICP-MS. Sci. Total. Environ. 2014, 493, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kaiser, H.F. The varimax criteria for analytical rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958, 23, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Krauskopf, K.B.; Bird, D.K. Introduction to Geochemistry, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Location of the study area and sampling sites of air-monitoring stations.
Figure 1. Location of the study area and sampling sites of air-monitoring stations.
Ijerph 20 00724 g001
Figure 2. Average distribution of trace element concentrations in PM2.5 and PM10. Data are expressed in ng m−3.
Figure 2. Average distribution of trace element concentrations in PM2.5 and PM10. Data are expressed in ng m−3.
Ijerph 20 00724 g002
Figure 3. Average enrichment factors (EFs) for the analyzed elements in PM2.5 and PM10 samples. The dashed line indicates the boundary between enriched and non-enriched.
Figure 3. Average enrichment factors (EFs) for the analyzed elements in PM2.5 and PM10 samples. The dashed line indicates the boundary between enriched and non-enriched.
Ijerph 20 00724 g003
Figure 4. Distribution leaching coefficient, Rls, for metals and metalloids in each of the PM10 and PM2.5 size fractions.
Figure 4. Distribution leaching coefficient, Rls, for metals and metalloids in each of the PM10 and PM2.5 size fractions.
Ijerph 20 00724 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 samples at the three monitoring stations. Mass -concentrations expressed in μg m−3. The number of samples for each monitoring station is shown in brackets.
Table 1. Characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 samples at the three monitoring stations. Mass -concentrations expressed in μg m−3. The number of samples for each monitoring station is shown in brackets.
PM2.5PM10
Urban (40)Urban (40)Suburban (22)
Mean293516
Std.Dev.4117
Min20168
Max316944
Table 2. Chemical–physical parameters measured in the leaching filters. EC: electrical conductivity (μS/cm), EH (mV).
Table 2. Chemical–physical parameters measured in the leaching filters. EC: electrical conductivity (μS/cm), EH (mV).
pHECEH
μS cm−1mV
Urban station TPM2.5 Mean6.515256
Std.Dev.0.215263
Min6.10.5209
Max6.847289
Urban station TPM10Mean6.516246
Std.Dev.0.215263
Min6.10.5209
Max6.847289
Suburban station TPM10Mean6.710249
Std.Dev.0.21.120
Min6.59213
Max6.912274
Table 3. Concentrations of water-soluble trace elements (WSTE) and the major ions in PM2.5 and PM10 samples. Data are expressed in ng m−3 for trace elements and μg m−3 for major-ions. Test U: Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05). The level of statistical significance is indicated in italics.
Table 3. Concentrations of water-soluble trace elements (WSTE) and the major ions in PM2.5 and PM10 samples. Data are expressed in ng m−3 for trace elements and μg m−3 for major-ions. Test U: Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05). The level of statistical significance is indicated in italics.
PM2.5PM10UrbPM10Suburb Test UPM10Urb-Suburb
MeanMedianMeanMedianMeanMedianp-Level
Al0.790.501.000.470.920.750.1097
As0.150.130.140.130.130.140.8227
Ba8.047.167.706.613.654.200.0024
Co0.040.040.040.040.040.050.2802
Cr0.270.250.570.370.270.290.0698
Cu5.885.284.864.213.353.360.0207
Fe15.814.013.713.07.097.620.0092
Li0.040.030.050.050.040.040.2172
Mn2.332.302.372.111.601.720.3036
Mo0.520.500.390.370.250.210.5326
Ni0.220.200.230.210.250.210.7086
Pb0.280.220.540.361.411.260.0029
Rb0.130.120.160.150.230.230.6718
Sb1.281.091.010.890.510.350.0129
Sr1.701.572.912.652.452.380.1811
U0.0020.0010.0040.0020.0020.0010.7565
V1.871.501.251.041.731.820.0984
Zn9.138.7111.89.9213.39.420.9801
Ca2+1.972.071.741.431.361.120.2788
Cl0.470.081.881.470.120.100.0004
K+0.230.220.880.241.211.160.6144
Mg2+0.170.140.590.300.640.490.0014
Na+0.610.351.271.270.920.640.0001
NH4+0.810.551.240.600.710.650.8012
NO32.060.853.871.720.820.850.0008
SO42−1.451.372.151.591.511.190.1990
Table 4. Factor loadings (Varimax rotation) for the filter samples of PM10 and PM2.5 (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Factor loadings (Varimax rotation) for the filter samples of PM10 and PM2.5 (p < 0.05).
Factor 1Factor 2Factor 3
Ca−0.420.060.65
Cl−0.040.920.09
Cr0.800.120.13
Cu0.740.000.60
Li0.07−0.220.71
Mo−0.290.060.07
Na−0.040.95−0.07
Sb0.600.080.21
SO40.120.070.50
Sr0.330.110.75
Zn0.76−0.210.11
Expl.Var2.531.882.18
Prp.Totl0.310.170.24
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Varrica, D.; Alaimo, M.G. Determination of Water-Soluble Trace Elements in the PM10 and PM2.5 of Palermo Town (Italy). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010724

AMA Style

Varrica D, Alaimo MG. Determination of Water-Soluble Trace Elements in the PM10 and PM2.5 of Palermo Town (Italy). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(1):724. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010724

Chicago/Turabian Style

Varrica, Daniela, and Maria Grazia Alaimo. 2023. "Determination of Water-Soluble Trace Elements in the PM10 and PM2.5 of Palermo Town (Italy)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 1: 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010724

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop