Next Article in Journal
Cognitive Patterns and Problematic Use of Video Games in Adolescents: A Cluster Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Implementation and Evaluation of an Innovative Pilot Intervention to Improve the Family Quality of Life of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities—A Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Covariates of Electronic Cigarette Use among Students Aged 13–15 Years in the Philippines: 2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey

1
Global Tobacco Control Branch, Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
2
CDC Global Health Fellowship Program, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA 94607, USA
3
CyberData Technologies, Herndon, VA 20171, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(24), 7193; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20247193
Submission received: 18 October 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 12 December 2023 / Published: 18 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tobacco Use in Adolescents and Youth)

Abstract

:
Electronic cigarette use is growing in popularity and accessibility among youth in the Southeast Asia region. We analyzed data on 6670 students, aged 13–15 years, from the Philippines’ 2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for current use (i.e., past 30 days), ever use, and awareness of e-cigarettes. Chi-square tests compared prevalence differences between groups. Multiple logistic regression models assessed factors associated with e-cigarette use while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, current use of other tobacco products, and secondhand smoke exposure. Prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 14.1% (95% CI = 12.4%, 15.8%), ever use was 24.6% (95% CI = 22.4%, 26.9%), and awareness was 75.5% (95% CI = 73.0%, 78.0%). Current use of any other tobacco products and exposure to secondhand smoke at home, school, or other public places were positively associated with current and ever use of e-cigarettes. Boys and youth living in Luzon or Mindanao had higher odds of current e-cigarette use compared to girls and youth in Visayas. Findings indicated that one in four Philippine students aged 13–15 years ever used e-cigarettes and one in seven currently use e-cigarettes. This study highlights the importance of implementing evidence-based strategies, including relevant tobacco control policies.

1. Introduction

Tobacco kills up to half of the people that use it [1,2]. Globally, more than 8 million deaths result directly from tobacco use, while approximately 1.3 million deaths occur from exposure to secondhand smoke [2]. Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is growing in popularity and accessibility among youth and adults globally [2,3]. On average, in 2012, global health care expenditure due to a smoking-related illness was USD 422 billion [3]. The Southeast Asia market, including countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, are expected to have significant growth in the e-cigarette market in coming years, making them a desirable target of tobacco companies [1]. According to a comprehensive literature review of current e-cigarette use among adolescents in Southeast Asia, the prevalence of current use ranges from 3.3% to 11.8% [4]. Tobacco use is the leading risk factor for mortality in the Philippines [5]. Studies show that students are more susceptible to e-cigarette use because of their flavors, attractive packaging, price promotions, and use among peers [6,7]. E-cigarettes are often marketed as a cessation device or substitute for cigarettes; however, they have the potential to increase nicotine addiction among young adults and youth who do not smoke [6,8].
Toxicants and carcinogens in combustible cigarette smoke remain higher than aerosols produced by e-cigarettes [8]. In 2005, the Philippines became party to the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) to control tobacco use and exposure to tobacco smoke in the country [5,9,10]. To reduce tobacco demand, the WHO introduced the MPOWER measures (M: Monitor tobacco use and prevention policies, P: Protect people from tobacco smoke, O: Offer help to quit smoking, W: Warn about the dangers of tobacco, E: Enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship, R: Raise taxes on tobacco) [11]. The Philippines implemented regulations focused on the marketing and use of tobacco products [9,10]. However, as of 2019, of students that currently smoke cigarettes in the Philippines, 37.1% were not restricted when purchasing tobacco products and e-cigarettes [12]. A previous study based on pooled analyses of 68 countries, including the Philippines, found that the prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 9.2% among youth aged 12 to 16 years from 2012 to 2019 [13]. However, there is limited information about e-cigarette use among students aged 13–15 years in the Philippines. We estimated the weighted prevalence of current and ever e-cigarette use and awareness in the Philippines and examined covariates associated with its use and awareness among students aged 13–15 years using data from the 2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

The target population includes students aged 13–15 years who participated in the 2019 GYTS in the Philippines. The GYTS is a two-stage cross-sectional, nationally representative, school-based survey that is a global standard for systematically monitoring tobacco use by students and tracking key indicators of tobacco control [14]. GYTS uses a standardized methodology for school selection, class representation, and data processes. The two-stage sample design allows for classes at selected schools to be chosen randomly and for all students of those selected classes to be eligible for participation. To break each stage down further, the first stage comprises both public and private schools. These schools are chosen based on the probability proportional to the number of students at each school. For stage two, equal probability sampling is performed. Classes from each school are randomly selected, and all students in the selected classrooms are eligible for the survey. GYTS is an anonymous survey, and the questionnaire is self-administered by students [14].
The total sample comprised 12,479 students from 96 schools and 295 classes. Of the 295 classes that were chosen, 290 classes participated, resulting in 10,602 students completing the survey; of these, 6670 were aged 13–15 years. Thus, the overall response rate was 83.5%.

2.2. Measures

The outcomes of this study were current use, ever use, and awareness of e-cigarettes. Current use of e-cigarettes was defined as ≥1 day of e-cigarette use in the last 30 days, based on the response to the question “During the past 30 days, on how many days did you use electronic cigarettes?” Response options included 0 days, 1 or 2 days, 3 to 5 days, 6 to 9 days, 10 to 19 days, 20 to 29 days, and all 30 days. Ever use of e-cigarettes was defined as answering yes to the question “Have you ever tried or experimented with electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes or vape, even one or two puffs?” Response options included yes and no. Awareness of e-cigarettes was defined as answering yes to the question “Before today, had you ever heard of or seen electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes or vape?” Response options included yes and no.
Independent variables included age (13 years, 14 years, and 15 years), gender (boy, girl), grade level (7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th), school type (public, private), island group (Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao), money spent on self in pesos (usually don’t have any spending money, less than P10.00, P10.00–P100.00, P101.00–P500.00, and more than P501.00), current use of any other tobacco products (yes, no), secondhand smoke exposure at home (yes, no), and secondhand smoke exposure at school or in other public places (yes, no). Any other tobacco products include cigarettes, any form of smoked tobacco products other than cigarettes such as cigars, waterpipes, pipes, and shisha, and any form of smokeless tobacco products such as snuff, chewing tobacco, dip, and betel quid with tobacco. Secondhand smoke exposure was defined as ≥1 day of smoke exposure in the last 7 days at home, in any enclosed public place, and in any outdoor public place. These included exposure to smoke at home and in any enclosed public place other than at home, such as schools, shops, restaurants, shopping malls, inside any public transportation vehicles, and any outdoor public place such as playgrounds, sidewalks, entrances to buildings, parks, and beaches.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Weighted prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for current use, ever use, and awareness of e-cigarettes were estimated among students aged 13–15 years in the Philippines. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare the differences in unadjusted prevalence between groups. Multivariable logistic regression models, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, current use of other tobacco products, and secondhand smoke exposure, were used to examine factors associated with current use, ever use, and awareness of e-cigarettes. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs were reported. The covariates assessed included gender, grade level, school type, money spent on self weekly, island group, current use of any other tobacco products, and secondhand smoke exposure at home, school, and other public places. All analyses were conducted using SAS-callable SUDAAN v11.0.1 (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) to account for the complex sample design and generate nationally representative estimates.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Students Who Currently Use, Ever Used, and Were Aware of E-Cigarettes

Of the 6670 students aged 13–15 years, about 80% attended a public school, 51.4% were girls, and 48.6% were boys. Approximately two in three students who currently (68.9%) or ever used (65.9%) e-cigarettes were boys (Table 1). Additionally, among students who currently used e-cigarettes, 29.6% were in the 8th grade and 36.3% were in the 9th grade.
The proportion of students who used any other tobacco products was 39.9% among those who currently use e-cigarettes, 30.5% among those who ever used e-cigarettes, and 13.9% among those who were aware of e-cigarettes.
Geographically, more than half (58.6%) of the students who participated in the survey and more than 40% (42.4%) of students who currently used e-cigarettes were in Luzon. Most students (70.6%) were not exposed to secondhand smoke at home, but more than half (59.9%) were exposed to secondhand smoke at school or any other public places. In addition, 43.5% of students who currently used e-cigarettes spent P10.00–P100.00 (pesos) during an average week.

3.2. Prevalence of Current Use, Ever Use, and Awareness of E-Cigarettes

Table 2 displays the weighted prevalence of current use, ever use, and awareness of e-cigarettes. Among students aged 13–15 years in the Philippines, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 14.1% (95% CI = 12.4%, 15.8%), ever use of e-cigarettes was 24.6% (95% CI = 22.4%, 26.9%), and awareness was 75.5% (95% CI = 73.0%, 78.0%). Among boys, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 20.9% (95% CI = 18.4%, 23.4%); for girls, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 7.5% (95% CI = 6.2%, 8.9%).
Boys had a significantly higher prevalence of current and ever use of e-cigarettes than girls (p < 0.001) (Table 2). Prevalence of current e-cigarette use, ever use of e-cigarettes, and awareness of e-cigarettes was significantly lower among students aged 13 years than those older (p < 0.001). Students living in Visayas had a significantly lower prevalence of current and ever use than students in other island groups (p < 0.001). Those who were exposed to secondhand smoke at home had a higher prevalence of current e-cigarette use at 20.5% (p < 0.001), ever use of e-cigarettes at 31.8% (p < 0.001), and awareness of e-cigarettes at 81.4% (p < 0.001) when compared to those who were not exposed (11.5%, 21.7%, and 73.2%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Similarly, those who were exposed to secondhand smoke at school or in other public places had a higher prevalence of current e-cigarette use (17.7%, p < 0.001), ever use of e-cigarettes (29.8%, p < 0.001), and awareness of e-cigarettes (82.3%, p < 0.001) when compared to those who were not exposed (8.7%, 17.0%, and 65.3%, respectively).

3.3. Factors Associated with Current Use, Ever Use, and Awareness of E-Cigarettes

After adjusting for covariates, current use of any smoked or smokeless tobacco products was associated with increased odds of current use of e-cigarettes (aOR = 5.2, 95% CI = 3.9, 6.9) and increased odds of ever use of e-cigarettes (aOR = 4.3, 95% CI = 3.2, 5.7). Secondhand smoke exposure at home and secondhand smoke exposure at school or in other public places were positively associated with current use, ever use, and awareness of e-cigarettes (Table 3). Relative to girls, boys had a significantly higher adjusted odds ratio of current use (aOR = 3.0, 95% CI = 2.5, 3.7), ever use (aOR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.7, 4.0), and e-cigarette awareness (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1, 1.5). Students living in the Luzon island group had higher adjusted odds of current use (aOR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.2, 2.4), ever use (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3, 2.2), and awareness (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3, 2.4) of e-cigarettes, relative to those from the Visayas island group. Students living in Mindanao had 60% increased odds of current use of e-cigarettes than those living in Visayas (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1, 2.5) (Table 3). Being in Grade 10 was positively associated with ever use of e-cigarettes (aOR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3, 3.5) compared to being in Grade 7. Additionally, students in Grade 7 had significantly lower adjusted odds of e-cigarette awareness relative to those in higher grades. Compared to students who did not have any spending money, those who spent more than P501.00 (pesos) were more likely to ever use (aOR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3, 3.2) e-cigarettes. Students who spent P101.00–P500.00 (pesos) had higher adjusted odds of ever use (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1, 2.3) and awareness (aOR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4, 2.6) of e-cigarettes compared to those who did not have any spending money.

4. Discussion

The present study analyzed the most recent GYTS data for the Philippines and fills a research gap in understanding students’ e-cigarette use and its associated factors in the country. The overall prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 14.1%, ever use was 24.6%, and awareness was 75.5%. We found that current use of any smoked and smokeless tobacco products and exposure to secondhand smoke at home, school, or in other public places were associated with higher odds of current and ever e-cigarette use. Additionally, being a boy and living in the island group of Luzon or Mindanao were associated with current e-cigarette use.
Our findings are consistent with another study that examined e-cigarette use in 68 countries and found that students who were boys, students who currently smoked cigarettes or other tobacco products, and students exposed to secondhand smoke were more likely to use e-cigarettes [13]. Additionally, a cross-sectional study in Thailand, another country in the region, assessed the prevalence of e-cigarettes among adolescents and factors associated with e-cigarette use [15]. Patanavanich et al. found that the prevalence of current e-cigarette use in Thailand among seventh graders was 3.7% and ever use was 7.2% in 2019 [15,16]. These estimates are lower than our results of 11.7% for current e-cigarette use and 19.1% for ever use among seventh graders in the Philippines. The difference in current e-cigarette use between Thailand and the Philippines may partially be explained by Thailand’s prohibition on the importation and sale of e-cigarettes, which was enacted in 2015 [15,16]. Based on evidence from Southeast Asia, Thailand has some of the strongest anti-tobacco policies [17,18]. However, illicit trade may undermine these efforts [17,18].
We found that students aged 13–15 years who currently use any other tobacco product (e.g., cigarettes, cigars, waterpipes, pipes, shisha, snuff, chewing tobacco, dip, betel quid with tobacco) and those exposed to secondhand smoke at home, school, and any other public places were more likely to currently use e-cigarettes. Additionally, our study found that more self-spending was positively associated with ever e-cigarette use among students. This finding may imply that a higher range of disposable income in the Philippines encourages the use of e-cigarettes; previous studies have found that having disposable income facilitates access to tobacco products [19,20,21].
The Philippines have implemented e-cigarette legislation, such as the Rules and Regulations on Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) [22,23] and the Republic Act No. 10643 [24], which requires health warnings on tobacco products. However, despite its well-intentioned purpose, ENDS reduced the minimum age for accessing vaping products from 21 to 18 years of age [25]. In May 2021, the Philippines adopted the Non-Combustible Nicotine Delivery Systems Regulation Act, which regulates the manufacture, distribution, sale, use, packaging, promotion, and advertisement of electronic nicotine systems, non-nicotine delivery systems, heated tobacco products, and novel tobacco products [26]. This law prohibits the sale of vaporized nicotine and non-nicotine products to an individual under the age of 18 years [26]. Additionally, the law prohibits the use of vaporized nicotine at any indoor public establishment, except in a Designated Vaping Area (DVA) [26]. This Act aligns with the WHO MPOWER, a set of evidence-based strategies for reducing the demand for tobacco, specifically advocating for enforced bans on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship strategy [11]. The Republic Act 11900, known as the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act, became law on 25 July 2022, following rigorous scrutiny in the Philippine Congress. This legislation seeks to regulate e-cigarettes and offers cessation techniques to people who use tobacco. However, the law lowered the minimum age for accessing vaping products from 21 to 18 [25]. To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of this policy approach, continued surveillance of tobacco use, including e-cigarette use, is needed to track prevalence changes in the Philippines [27]. There is evidence that policy interventions to reduce youth tobacco use should be considered, including the MPOWER framework [2,11].
This study is subject to several limitations. Because this is a cross-sectional study, we cannot examine the causal effects between the covariates and outcome variables (e.g., current use, ever use, and awareness of e-cigarettes). This study is only generalizable to students aged 13–15 years who attended formal schooling, so we cannot extrapolate the results to those who may have dropped out of school, those who are not enrolled in school, or students in different age groups in the Philippines. Additionally, students may underreport due to their perceptions of social norms, which may have led to self-reporting bias and/or social desirability bias. Furthermore, information bias can arise from incorrect interpretation of questions and inaccurate answer selection, leading to misclassification of e-cigarette use. While the GTYS survey was conducted in 2019, youth usage patterns do also change rapidly.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study indicate that as of 2019, approximately one in four Philippine students aged 13–15 years had ever used e-cigarettes and one in seven currently used e-cigarettes, respectively. Understanding the demographic characteristics, smoking exposures, and current tobacco use associated with e-cigarette use among students may help inform tobacco control strategies for reducing e-cigarette use. Continued surveillance of e-cigarettes can help monitor the effectiveness of current demand reduction strategies and may help identify new ones. Future research may be needed to evaluate the progress and impact of the Philippines’ policies on e-cigarette manufacture, distribution, sale, use, packaging, promotion, and advertisement.

Author Contributions

C.S. has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the analysis. Study concept and design: C.S., G.N., N.J. and L.P. Acquisition of data: C.S. and N.J. Analysis and interpretation of data: C.S., G.N., N.J. and L.P. Drafting of the manuscript: C.S. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: C.S., G.N., N.J. and L.P. Statistical analyses: C.S., G.N. and N.J. Administrative, technical, or material support: G.N., N.J. and L.P. Study supervision: G.N. and L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The present study is not subject to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Institutional Review Board (IRB) review because secondary data are used for this analysis.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our in-country partners in the Philippines for facilitating the Global Youth Tobacco Survey.

Conflicts of Interest

Nerline Jacques is an employee of CyberData Technologies. There are no potential conflicts, real or perceived, for any of the named authors. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Abbreviations

Electronic cigarette—e-cigarette; World Health Organization (WHO); Framework Convention on Tobacco Control—FCTC; Global Youth Tobacco Survey—GYTS; Centers of Disease Control Prevention—CDC; Institution Review Board—IRB; confidence interval—CI; adjusted odds ratio—aOR; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems—ENDS; Designated Vaping Area—DVA.

References

  1. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1223–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization. Tobacco Key Facts; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  3. Goodchild, M.; Nargis, N.; Tursan d’Espaignet, E. Global economic cost of smoking-attributable diseases. Tob. Control 2018, 27, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jane Ling, M.Y.; Abdul Halim, A.F.N.; Ahmad, D.; Ahmad, N.; Safian, N.; Mohammed Nawi, A. Prevalence and Associated Factors of E-Cigarette Use among Adolescents in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bellew, B.; Antonio, M.; Limpin, M.; Alzona, L.; Trinidad, F.; Dorotheo, U.; Yapchiongco, R.; Garcia, R.; Anden, A.; Alday, J. Addressing the tobacco epidemic in the Philippines: Progress since ratification of the WHO FCTC. Public Health Action 2013, 3, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. US Department of Health Human Services. E-Cigarette Use among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2016.
  7. Struik, L.L.; Dow-Fleisner, S.; Belliveau, M.; Thompson, D.; Janke, R. Tactics for Drawing Youth to Vaping: Content Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Advertisements. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e18943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Eltorai, A.E.; Choi, A.R.; Eltorai, A.S. Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Various Organ Systems. Respir. Care 2019, 64, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Solidum, J.G.N.; Solomon, R.G.; Silverio, C.E.; Dee, E.C. The Philippine vape bill: How politics affects health. Lancet Respir. Med. 2022, 10, e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Furlow, B. Philippines confronts a powerful tobacco industry. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017, 5, 172–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dubray, J.; Schwartz, R.; Chaiton, M.; O’Connor, S.; Cohen, J.E. The effect of MPOWER on smoking prevalence. Tob. Control 2015, 24, 540–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. World Health Organization. 6th Global Youth Tobacco Survey Country Report: Philippines 2019; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  13. Sun, J.; Xi, B.; Ma, C.; Zhao, M.; Bovet, P. Prevalence of E-Cigarette Use and Its Associated Factors Among Youths Aged 12 to 16 Years in 68 Countries and Territories: Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2012–2019. Am. J. Public Health 2022, 112, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Global Tobacco Surveillance System Data (GTSSData) Fact Sheets; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019.
  15. Patanavanich, R.; Aekplakorn, W.; Glantz, S.A.; Kalayasiri, R. Use of E-Cigarettes and Associated Factors among Youth in Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2021, 22, 2199–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Patanavanich, R.; Glantz, S. Successful countering of tobacco industry efforts to overturn Thailand’s ENDS ban. Tob. Control 2021, 30, e10–e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pavananunt, P. Illicit cigarette trade in Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2011, 42, 1531–1539. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Chantornvong, S.; McCargo, D. Political economy of tobacco control in Thailand. Tob. Control 2001, 10, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mohan, S.; Sankara Sarma, P.; Thankappan, K.R. Access to pocket money and low educational performance predict tobacco use among adolescent boys in Kerala, India. Prev. Med. 2005, 41, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Casetta, B.; Videla, A.J.; Bardach, A.; Morello, P.; Soto, N.; Lee, K.; Camacho, P.A.; Hermoza Moquillaza, R.V.; Ciapponi, A. Association Between Cigarette Smoking Prevalence and Income Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2017, 19, 1401–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Khan, J.R. The Prevalence and Correlates of Tobacco Use among 7–9th Grade Students in Bangladesh; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  22. Puyat, C.V.M.; Robredo, J.P.G.; Tiam-Lee, J.G.A.; Domingo, A.F.E.; Hemedez-Gonzales, R.R.; Eala, M.A.B.; Dans, A.L. E-Cigarette Regulation: Lessons From the Philippines. Pediatrics 2023, 151, e2022057825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. President, O.O.T. Prohibiting the Manufacture, Distribution, Marketing and Sale of Unregistered and/or Adulterated Electronic Nicotine/Non-Nicotine Delivery Systems, Heated Tobacco Products and Other Novel Tobacco Products, Amending Executive Order no. 26 (S. 2017) and for Other Purposes. Available online: https://www.fda.gov.ph/executive-order-no-106-prohibiting-the-Manufacture-Distribution-Marketing-and-Sale-of-Unregistered-and-or-Adulterated-Electronic-Nicotine-Non-Nicotine-Delivery-Systems-Heated-Tobacco-Products-a/ (accessed on 3 March 2023).
  24. Loreto-Garin, J.P. Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act NO. 10643 “An Act to Effectively Instill Health Consciousness Through Graphic Health Warnings on Tobacco Products”, Otherwise Known As “The Graphic Health Warnings Law”. 2014. Available online: https://seatca.org/dmdocuments/IRR%20of%20RA%2010643%20Graphic%20Health%20Warnings.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2023).
  25. Sese, L.V.C.; Guillermo, M.C.L. E-Smoking out the Facts: The Philippines’ Vaping Dilemma. Tob. Use Insights 2023, 16, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress. An Act Regulating the Importation, Manufacture, Sale, Packaging, Distribution, Use, and Communication of Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products, and Novel Tobacco Products. 2021. Available online: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11900_2022.html (accessed on 18 April 2023).
  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Global Youth Tobacco Survey Factsheet Philippines 2019; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019.
Table 1. Characteristics of students aged 13–15 years (n = 6670) by current and ever e-cigarette users and e-cigarette awareness in the Philippines, Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2019.
Table 1. Characteristics of students aged 13–15 years (n = 6670) by current and ever e-cigarette users and e-cigarette awareness in the Philippines, Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2019.
TotalCurrent E-Cigarette UsersEver E-Cigarette UsersE-Cigarette
Awareness
(n = 6670)(n = 817) (n = 1452) (n = 4841)
n (%) a n (%) n (%) n (%)
Gender
Girls3700 (51.4)252 (31.1)494 (34.1)2638 (54.5)
Boys2958 (48.6)559 (68.9)953 (65.9)2198 (45.5)
Age (years)
132222 (33.7)208 (25.5)369 (25.4)1489 (30.8)
142139 (33.1)265 (32.4)461 (31.7)1564 (30.2)
152309 (33.2)344 (42.1)622 (42.8)1788 (39.0)
Island group
Visayas2186 (19.8)196 (24.0)367 (25.3)1484 (30.7)
Luzon2271 (58.6)346 (42.4)612 (42.1)1847 (38.2)
Mindanao2213 (21.6)275 (33.7)473 (32.6)1510 (31.2)
Grade level
Grade 7674 (11.2)77 (9.4)116 (8.0)376 (7.8)
Grade 82517 (36.1)241 (29.6)427 (29.6)1680 (34.9)
Grade 92060 (32.8)296 (36.3)502 (34.8)1573 (32.6)
Grade 101380 (19.9)201 (24.7)398 (27.6)1189 (24.7)
School type
Public5391 (80.4)638 (78.6)1134 (78.6)3868 (80.2)
Private1244 (19.6)174 (21.4)309 (21.4)952 (19.8)
Money spent on self
Usually don’t have any spending money281 (4.1)35 (4.3)55 (3.8)183 (3.8)
Less than P10.001201 (16.1)106 (13.1)181 (12.5)632 (13.1)
P10.00–P100.003267 (47.4)353 (43.5)636 (44.0)2407 (49.8)
P101.00–P500.001649 (27.8)260 (32.1)480 (33.2)1397 (28.9)
More than P501.00250 (4.6)57 (7.0)92 (6.4)210 (4.3)
Current use of any other tobacco products
No5430 (86.6)439 (60.1)899 (69.5)3956 (86.1)
Yes766 (13.4)277 (39.9)379 (30.5)577 (13.9)
Secondhand smoke exposure at home
No4698 (70.6)456 (56.0)890 (61.5)3303 (68.3)
Yes1956 (29.4)359 (44.0)558 (38.5)1533 (31.7)
Secondhand smoke exposure at school or any other public places
No2651 (40.1)194 (23.7)389 (26.8)1640 (33.9)
Yes4019 (59.9)623 (76.3)1063 (73.2)3201 (66.1)
a Sample size and weighted percentage.
Table 2. Weighted prevalence of current and ever e-cigarette use and e-cigarette awareness among students aged 13–15 years in the Philippines, Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2019.
Table 2. Weighted prevalence of current and ever e-cigarette use and e-cigarette awareness among students aged 13–15 years in the Philippines, Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2019.
Current E-Cigarette UseEver E-Cigarette UseE-Cigarette Awareness
% (95% CI)% (95% CI)% (95% CI)
14.1 (12.4–15.8)24.6 (22.4–26.9)75.5 (73.0–78.0)
Gender
Girls b7.5 (6.2–8.9) 14.8 (12.5–17.0) 74.6 (71.4–77.9)
Boys20.9 (18.4–23.4) a35.2 (32.4–37.9) a76.5 (74.1–79.0) a
Age (years)
13 b10.6 (8.6–12.6) 19.5 (16.6–22.3) 70.2 (65.9–74.4)
1414.5 (12.1–16.8) a24.5 (21.3–27.7) a76.6 (73.8–79.4) a
1517.2 (14.4–20.0) a30.1 (26.8–33.3) a79.8 (77.0–82.6) a
Island group
Visayas b9.8 (7.8–11.9) 17.8 (14.6–21.0)67.2 (61.6–72.8)
Luzon15.9 (13.3–18.6) a27.8 (24.5–31.2) a81.4 (78.8–84.0) a
Mindanao12.9 (9.8–16.1) a 22.1 (17.2–27.1) a 67.1 (59.4–74.8)
Grade level
Grade 7 b11.7 (8.9–14.6) 19.1 (15.9–22.3) 57.2 (50.6–63.8)
Grade 811.0 (9.3–12.7)19.7 (17.1–22.4)71.3 (67.8–74.9) a
Grade 917.0 (14.5–19.5) a27.5 (24.2–30.8) a79.6 (76.9–82.3) a
Grade 1016.3 (12.7–19.8) a31.6 (27.4–35.8) a 86.9 (84.5–89.4) a
School type
Private b14.2 (10.7–17.6) 25.9 (20.7–31.0) 79.0 (73.6–84.4)
Public14.0 (12.3–15.8)24.3 (21.9–26.7)74.7 (72.4–77.0)
Money spent on self
Usually don’t have any spending money b12.9 (9.3–16.6) 20.9 (15.8–25.9) 68.5 (63.1–73.8)
Less than P10.00 9.7 (7.2–12.1) a17.1 (13.8–20.3) a54.2 (49.6–58.8) a
P10.00–P100.00 12.6 (10.5–14.6) a 22.0 (19.6–24.5) a 76.1 (73.5–78.7) a
P101.00–P500.0017.6 (14.5–20.8) a 31.6 (28.0–35.2) a 86.2 (83.9–88.5) a
More than P501.0023.0 (19.3–26.6) a 37.5 (31.8–43.3) a 86.7 (81.8–91.6) a
Current use of any other tobacco
products
No b9.2 (7.6–10.7) 18.5 (16.4–20.6) 75.4 (72.7–78.1)
Yes41.2 (35.7–46.6) a56.1 (50.4–61.7) a79.3 (75.6–82.9) a
Secondhand smoke exposure at home
No b11.5 (9.9–13.1)21.7 (19.4–24.0) 73.2 (70.4–75.9)
Yes20.5 (17.8–23.2) a31.8 (28.8–34.9) a81.4 (78.5–84.3) a
Secondhand smoke exposure at school or any other public places
No b8.7 (7.0–10.5)17.0 (14.6–19.4)65.3 (61.8–68.7)
Yes17.7 (15.5–19.8) a29.8 (27.1–32.5) a82.3 (79.8–84.8) a
a Prevalence was statistically significantly different from the reference group at the p < 0.05 level using a chi-square test; b Reference group; Abbreviations: CI—Confidence interval.
Table 3. Factors associated with current e-cigarette use, ever e-cigarette use, and e-cigarette awareness among students aged 13–15 years in the Philippines, Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2019.
Table 3. Factors associated with current e-cigarette use, ever e-cigarette use, and e-cigarette awareness among students aged 13–15 years in the Philippines, Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2019.
Current E-Cigarette Use Ever E-Cigarette UseE-Cigarette Awareness
AOR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)
Gender
Girlsaaa
Boys3.0 (2.5–3.7)3.3 (2.7–4.0)1.3 (1.1–1.5)
Island group
Visayasaaa
Luzon1.7 (1.2–2.4)1.6 (1.3–2.2)1.8 (1.3–2.4)
Mindanao1.6 (1.1–2.5)1.5 (1.0–2.3)1.1 (0.7–1.6)
Grade level
Grade 7aaa
Grade 81.1 (0.7–1.6)1.2 (0.8–1.7)1.7 (1.2–2.4)
Grade 91.8 (1.1–2.9)1.7 (1.2–2.6)2.4 (1.7–3.3)
Grade 101.6 (0.9–2.9)2.1 (1.3–3.5)3.5 (2.5–4.8)
School type
Privateaaa
Public1.0 (0.7–1.5)1.0 (0.7–1.4)0.9 (0.6–1.2)
Money spent on self
Usually don’t have any spendingaaa
money
Less than P10.000.6 (0.4–0.9)0.7 (0.5–1.0)0.5 (0.4–0.7)
P10.00–P100.000.8 (0.5–1.3)1.0 (0.7–1.4)1.1 (0.8–1.5)
P101.00–P500.001.2 (0.8–1.8)1.6 (1.1–2.3)1.9 (1.4–2.6)
More than P501.001.6 (0.9–2.8)2.0 (1.3–3.2)1.9 (1.0–3.4)
Current use of any other tobacco products
Noaaa
Yes5.2 (3.9–6.9)4.3 (3.2–5.7)1.0 (0.8–1.3)
Secondhand smoke exposure at home
Noaaa
Yes1.4 (1.2–1.7)1.3 (1.1–1.5)1.3 (1.1–1.5)
Secondhand smoke exposure at school or any other public places
Noaaa
Yes1.7 (1.4–2.0)1.8 (1.5–2.0)2.1 (1.7–2.5)
a Reference value; Abbreviations: AOR—Adjusted odds ratio estimated from logistic regression controlling for all the covariates included in the table; CI—Confidence interval. Bold font indicates statistically significant results.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serra, C.; Njie, G.; Jacques, N.; Pan, L. Prevalence and Covariates of Electronic Cigarette Use among Students Aged 13–15 Years in the Philippines: 2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 7193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20247193

AMA Style

Serra C, Njie G, Jacques N, Pan L. Prevalence and Covariates of Electronic Cigarette Use among Students Aged 13–15 Years in the Philippines: 2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(24):7193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20247193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serra, Chelsea, Gibril Njie, Nerline Jacques, and Liping Pan. 2023. "Prevalence and Covariates of Electronic Cigarette Use among Students Aged 13–15 Years in the Philippines: 2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 24: 7193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20247193

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop