Next Article in Journal
A Screening Method for Assessing Cumulative Impacts
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of the Built Environment on Young People’s Physical Activity Patterns: A Suburban-Rural Comparison Using GPS
Previous Article in Journal
Building Climate Resilience in the Blue Nile/Abay Highlands: A Framework for Action
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relevance of Personal Characteristics in Allocating Health Care Resources—Controversial Preferences of Laypersons with Different Educational Backgrounds
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9(2), 632-647; doi:10.3390/ijerph9020632

Comparison of BMI Derived from Parent-Reported Height and Weight with Measured Values: Results from the German KiGGS Study

Department of Epidemiology and Health Reporting, Robert Koch Institute, 13302 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 24 December 2011 / Revised: 6 February 2012 / Accepted: 9 February 2012 / Published: 16 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Behavior and Public Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [373 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

The use of parent-reported height and weight is a cost-efficient instrument to assess the prevalence of children’s weight status in large-scale surveys. This study aimed to examine the accuracy of BMI derived from parent-reported height and weight and to identify potential predictors of the validity of BMI derived from parent-reported data. A subsample of children aged 2–17 years (n = 9,187) was taken from the 2003–2006 cross-sectional German KiGGS study. Parent-reported and measured height and weight were collected and BMI was calculated. Besides descriptive analysis, linear regression models with BMI difference and logistic regression models with weight status misclassification as dependent variables were calculated. Height differences varied by gender and were generally small. Weight and BMI were under-reported in all age groups, the under-reporting getting stronger with increasing age. Overall, the proportion for overweight and obesity based on parental and measured reports differed slightly. In the youngest age group, the proportion of overweight children was overestimated, while it was underestimated for older children and adolescents. Main predictors of the difference between parent reported and measured values were age, gender, weight status and parents’ perception of the child’s weight. In summary, the exclusive use of uncorrected parental reports for assessment of prevalence rates of weight status is not recommended.
Keywords: children and adolescents; parental reports; height; weight; BMI; overweight children and adolescents; parental reports; height; weight; BMI; overweight
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Brettschneider, A.-K.; Ellert, U.; Schaffrath Rosario, A. Comparison of BMI Derived from Parent-Reported Height and Weight with Measured Values: Results from the German KiGGS Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 632-647.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top