Next Article in Journal
New Distributed Optimization Method for TSO–DSO Coordinated Grid Operation Preserving Power System Operator Sovereignty
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Energy Performance and Environmental Impact of Low GWP Vapor Compression Chilled Water Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Demand-Side Flexibility Impact on Prosumer Energy System Planning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Li et al. A Comparison of Various Bottom-Up Urban Energy Simulation Methods Using a Case Study in Hangzhou, China. Energies 2020, 13, 4781

1
School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2
Key Laboratory of Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China
3
The Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, London WC1E7HB, UK
4
College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
5
Key Laboratory of Ecology and Energy-Saving Study of Dense Habitat (Tongji University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(12), 4752; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124752
Submission received: 24 May 2023 / Revised: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 June 2023 / Published: 16 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Demand Management for Buildings and Industrial Facilities)

Additional Affiliations

In the published publication [1], there was an error regarding the affiliations for Xing Shi. In addition to the affiliations:
4—College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
5—Key Laboratory of Ecology and Energy-Saving Study of Dense Habitat (Tongji University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200092, China.
The updated affiliations should include:
1—School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was made on the authors’ request, and was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhu, S.; Yang, J.; Wei, S.; Zhang, X.; Shi, X. A Comparison of Various Bottom-Up Urban Energy Simulation Methods Using a Case Study in Hangzhou, China. Energies 2020, 13, 4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhu, S.; Yang, J.; Wei, S.; Zhang, X.; Shi, X. Correction: Li et al. A Comparison of Various Bottom-Up Urban Energy Simulation Methods Using a Case Study in Hangzhou, China. Energies 2020, 13, 4781. Energies 2023, 16, 4752. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124752

AMA Style

Li Y, Wang C, Zhu S, Yang J, Wei S, Zhang X, Shi X. Correction: Li et al. A Comparison of Various Bottom-Up Urban Energy Simulation Methods Using a Case Study in Hangzhou, China. Energies 2020, 13, 4781. Energies. 2023; 16(12):4752. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yanxia, Chao Wang, Sijie Zhu, Junyan Yang, Shen Wei, Xinkai Zhang, and Xing Shi. 2023. "Correction: Li et al. A Comparison of Various Bottom-Up Urban Energy Simulation Methods Using a Case Study in Hangzhou, China. Energies 2020, 13, 4781" Energies 16, no. 12: 4752. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop