3.2. Electrochemical Study
The CV tests shown in
Figure 5 are the results of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode materials at the voltage range of 2.0–5.0 V, respectively, and the scanning speed is 0.1 mVs
−1. It can be observed from the figure that in the first cycle of CV forward scanning of commercial lithium manganese-based electrode materials, an oxidation current peak appears around 4.0 V and 4.6 V, respectively, corresponding to the redox between Ni
2+/4+ and Co
3+/4+ and the controversial deep de-lithium process. There was no obvious oxidation peak after 4.8 V. The oxidation peak of about 4.5 V almost disappeared in the subsequent cycle process, but in the voltage range of 3.0–3.5 V in the reduction process, a new steamed bun peak appeared, and as the CV cycle went on, the peak gradually increased, which was opposite to the change law of the current peak of about 4.5 V.
Figure 6 shows the charge and discharge curve of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode in the first two cycles. Due to the limitation of the high voltage range of the electrolyte, the test voltage range of the battery is 2.5–4.8 V. The cyclic capacity tests were carried out at room temperature and 55 °C under a current density of 50 mAg
−1. It was shown that the first cycle charging capacity of the battery at 55 °C is slightly higher than that at room temperature, but the discharge capacity is relatively lower, indicating that the battery at high temperature has a larger irreversible capacity loss of 28.5% in the first cycle than that at room temperature of 22.7%. It can also be observed from the cycle performance curve in
Figure 7 that the discharge capacity of the battery tested at room temperature attenuates from 279.4 mAhg
−1 to 250 mAhg
−1 after 50 charge-discharge cycles and the capacity retention rate reaches 89.5%. The discharge capacity of the battery tested at 55 °C decays from 264 mAhg
−1 to 198.3 mAhg
−1 after 50 cycles, and the capacity retention rate reaches 77.4%.
Figure 8 shows the magnification performance test results of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode under different charging and discharging current densities (50/100/200/500 mAg
−1) at 2.0–4.8 V. It can be observed that the reversible capacity of the battery is close to 270 mAhg
−1 with the current density of 50 mAg
−1, and it is still 170 mAhg
−1 with the current density of 500 mAg
−1, with the capacity retention rate reaching 63%.
Although such performance and magnification performance still cannot well meet the increasing requirements of high temperature working environments and fast charging of power batteries, Further improvements can be made to the overall performance of lithium manganese-based electrode materials by controlling the material composition and morphology, coupled with appropriate material modification and appropriate electrolyte. With the development of power battery technology, Li-manganese-rich electrode materials will be more widely used.
3.3. Electrochemical Study
Figure 9 shows the Nyquist diagram of 2.5–4.8 V during the first charge and discharge of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode at room temperature. It can be observed that the Nyquist diagram with an open circuit potential of 3.3 V is presented as a small arc in the high frequency range, an arc in the middle-high frequency range, and a large arc in the middle-low frequency range. As for the two small arcs in the high frequency range, they are respectively attributed to the contact resistance and the transmission resistance of lithium ions in the SEI. As the electrode polarization potential increased from 3.3 V to 3.9 V, the arc of the middle-low frequency range gradually curved and evolved into a semicircle in the middle frequency range and a slash in the low frequency range at 3.9 V. At this point, the Nyquist diagram consists of four parts: two arcs, one semicircle, and a slash. According to previous results, the semicircle in the middle frequency range is attributed to the charge transfer process, while the slant in the low frequency range is attributed to the solid diffusion process of lithium ions within the active material particles of the Li-manganese-rich electrode. As the electrode polarization potential continues to increase, the semicircle in the middle frequency range transforms back into an arc and shifts away from the real axis. Finally, the semicircle in the middle frequency range and the slash in the low frequency range turn into a large arc in the low frequency range at 4.7 V. In the process of the first discharge, the arc in the low frequency range changes towards or away from the real axis as the electrode potential changes, but it does not evolve into a semicircle or slash through the discharge process.
In order to further analyze the mechanism of more rapid decaying 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode at high temperature, shown in
Figure 7. The Nyquist diagram of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode at 3.3–4.8 V during the first charge at 55 °C is shown in
Figure 10. It can be observed that consistent with the test results at room temperature and 3.3 V, the EIS of the Li-manganese-rich electrode consists of a small semicircle in the high frequency range and a large arc in the middle-low frequency range. With the increase of the polarization potential, the arc in the middle-low frequency range gradually curves towards the X axis and completely transforms into a semicircle in the middle frequency range and a slant in the low frequency range at 3.9 V. Then, with the increase in polarization potential, it gradually transforms into a large arc again in the middle-low frequency range.
As shown in
Figure 11, an equivalent circuit is proposed to fit the Nyquist plots of
Figure 9. The RC circuit signifies the semicircle or arc in the Nyquist plots. R
s is Ohmic resistance; R
cf is the resistance of Schottky contact; R
SEI is the resistance of SEI; and R
ct is the resistance of charge transfer. The capacitance of the Schottky contact, SEI resistance, and double layer are represented by Q
cf, Q
SEI, and Q
dl, respectively.
Figure 12 shows the relationship between the arc resistance value in the high frequency range and the polarization potential of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode fitted according to the equivalent circuit in
Figure 11 under different experimental conditions.
Figure 12a,b show the transformation laws of R
cf and R
SEI as a function of electrode polarization potential during the first charge and discharge of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode at 2.5–4.8 V at room temperature. It can be observed that there is a strong dependence between the changes of R
cf and R
SEI, but the change of contact impedance is smaller and increases only during the second step of de-lithium.
Figure 12b shows the transformation law of R
SEI during the first charge and discharge of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode at room temperature between 2.5 V and 4.8 V. It can be observed that R
SEI slowly decreased as the polarization potential increased from 3.3 V to 3.85 V during the first charging process, which was mainly due to the reaction of a small amount of initial SEI with the electrolyte. When the electrode potential increased from 3.85 V to 4.5 V, R
SEI increased slowly. Compared with CV test results, it can be found that the first step of the de-lithium process begins and the redox processes of Ni
2+/4+ and Co
3+/4+ occur, which are mainly attributed to the removal of lithium ions and the oxygenation of electrolyte near the electrode surface caused by Ni
4+ with strong catalytic activity to generate a new SEI film [
28]. Then, at the potential range above 4.5 V, the impedance of SEI film increased rapidly again with the second step of the de-lithium process, indicating that this step of the de-lithium process leads to the instability of the Li-manganese-rich electrode/electrolyte interface. The oxygen removal process and the transition of Mn4+ to a lower valence state will inevitably lead to changes in the material structure, and the components of SEI film will also be affected. In addition, there are some problems, such as component decomposition in the potential interval above 4.5 V of the EC base electrolyte, resulting in increased instability of the interface and rapid thickening of the SEI film. During the first discharge, R
SEI gradually increased with the decrease of the polarization potential from 4.8 V to 2.5 V, which was caused by the continuous thickening of the SEI film caused by the insertion of lithium ions, the irreversibility of the redox process, and the spontaneous decomposition of the electrolyte.
Figure 12c shows the transformation law of R
SEI as a function of polarization potential during the first charge of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode between 3.3 V and 4.8 V at 55 °C. It can be seen from the figure that 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode R
SEI changed basically the same as at room temperature. Before the second step of the de-lithium process, SEI film is relatively stable. Later, due to the influence of high temperature and the instability of the electrode/electrolyte interface at high potential, R
SEI increased rapidly.
Figure 13 shows the relationship between the semi-circular resistance values in the middle frequency range of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode and electrode polarization potential at room temperature and 55 °C, fitted according to the equivalent circuit in
Figure 10. According to previous results, the semicircle in the intermediate frequency range is attributed to the charge transfer process impedance of the electrode/electrolyte interface.
As shown in
Figure 13a, the variation curve of charge transfer impedance Rct as a function of electrode polarization potential during the first charge of a Li-rich manganese-based electrode at room temperature is 3.8–4.6 V. It can be observed that in the potential range below 4.0 V, the R
ctS gradually decreased with the increase in polarization potential, which is in good combination with the change law of intercalation electrode R
ctS and electrode polarization potential, representing the redox processes of Ni
2+/4+ and Co
3+/4+. Then, with the increasing polarization potential, the R
ct basically remained unchanged when the voltage range was lower than 4.5 V, indicating that the lithium removal reaction inside the electrode and the lithium ion transfer process at the electrode/electrolyte interface were relatively stable within this potential range, which was also consistent with the change rule of R
SEI. When the potential range exceeds 4.5 V, R
ct increases rapidly during the second stage of the de-lithiation process. This is because the oxygen removal process and the transformation of Mn
4+ to the low valence state will inevitably lead to the transformation of material structure, which seriously affects the lithium ions transport performance at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Moreover, the changes in R
ct and R
SEI are strongly dependent on Li-manganese-rich electrodes. In other words, the stability of the electrode/electrolyte interface directly determines the electrochemical activity of the entire electrode, which makes improving the interface performance of materials an important means for the modification of Li-manganese-rich electrodes.
3.4. The Variations of Inductive Reactance for Li-Manganese-Rich Cathode
Figure 14 shows the change rule of inductive reactance with temperature during charge and discharge of Li-manganese-rich electrode. Due to the phenomenon of stripping of Li-manganese-rich electrode in the discharge process, the semicircle in the high frequency range will rapidly increase, resulting in the reactance in the middle frequency range being covered. Therefore, only the EIS data charged to 4.0 V is provided here. It can be observed that, in the EIS of 4.0 V charging, the diameter of the circles associated with inductive reactance in the middle frequency range decreases from large to small as the working temperature increases from −20 °C to 30 °C, and the circles related to inductance disappear at about 10 °C. This phenomenon indicates that lower temperatures weaken the contact between the active material particles of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode and between the active material and the conductive agent, which leads to increased inhomogeneity of lithium ions during embedding and removal processes. The electric field formed by the concentration cell zone resists the delithiation and lithiation processes.
However, the large arc associated with the charge transfer process in the middle-low frequency range increases gradually as the temperature decreases and finally becomes a diagonal line at low temperatures, indicating the low electrochemical activity of the Li-manganese-rich electrode at lower temperatures.
Combined with the previous findings on the change of the induced reactance in the electrochemical impedance spectrum of 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode with temperature, in order to better study the change of the inductive reactance in the electrochemical impedance spectrum of Li-manganese-rich electrode with electrode polarization potential during charging, the EIS of Li-Manganese-rich electrode was performed at −20 °C. According to the research results of the variable temperature-induced reactance shown in
Figure 14, the inductive reactance can be found more easily at −20 °C for long-term research.
Figure 15 shows the variation of inductive reactance with electrode polarization potential during charging and discharging at −20 °C for 0.5Li
2MnO
3·0.5Li(Ni
0.44Mn
0.44Co
0.12)O
2 electrode. From
Figure 15a, it can be seen that at an open-circuit potential of 3.3 V, there is an initial large circle associated with inductive reactance in the middle-high frequency range of the EIS of Li-manganese-rich electrode because there is no delithiation/lithiation process of lithium ions at this time. The induced reactance at this time should be completely attributed to the local concentration cell caused by the inhomogeneity of the conductivity between the active material particles of the electrode and the inhomogeneity of the initial SEI film. With the increase of polarization potential to 3.8 V, it can be seen that the diameter of the ring increases gradually and then decreases gradually with the increase of polarization potential, and the ring moves to the middle frequency range. It can be observed from the CV results that the process of delithium begins after 3.8 V, and a stable SEI film gradually forms with the process of delithium. The inductive reactance caused by the inhomogeneity of the initial SEI film is weakened, and the induced reactance caused by the inhomogeneity of the lithium ion is gradually dominated by the removal of lithium ions, resulting in the movement of the ring to the middle frequency range. Then the rings in the middle frequency range remained until the end of the charging process, while the rings associated with inductive reactance disappeared during the discharge process and did not appear again. As the electrode polarization potential increases, the arc in the middle-low frequency range bends toward the x-axis, eventually forming a semicircle attributed to charge transfer in the middle frequency range and a slash related to solid diffusion in the low frequency range. The radius of the semicircle in the middle frequency range gradually increases until it eventually reverts back to an arc in that range.
According to the experimental results,
Figure 16 shows the equivalent circuit fitted by the EIS at −20 °C for a lithium-manganese-based electrode. Where Q stands for constant phase angle element (CPE), Rs is the solution resistance of the electrolyte, R
SEI, and Q
dl, respectively, represent the semi-circular resistance of lithium-ion transmission in SEI film and SEI film capacitance in the high frequency range, L and R
L, respectively, represent inductive reactance and corresponding resistance, and Rct and Qdl represent the middle frequency range and charge transfer resistance and double layer capacitance. QD designates the diffusion impedance.
According to the equivalent circuit given in
Figure 16, the EIS data in
Figure 15 were fitted, and the obtained inductive reactance of the Li-Mangan-based electrode changing with the polarization potential of the electrode was given in
Figure 17. As can be observed from the figure, in the voltage range of 3.3–3.8 V during the first charge, the inductance value of the Li-manganese-rich electrode increases slowly with the increase in electrode polarization potential. There is no lithium-ion removal process in this voltage range, which is only attributed to the local concentration battery caused by the uneven conduction of the electrode and the uneven initial SEI film. The L value decreased rapidly after 3.8 V when the Li-manganese-rich electrode material just started to delithium. The transfer of lithium ions in the SEI film promoted the homogenization of the SEI film and weakened the previous inductance. In the voltage range of 4.1–4.5 V, the first step of the delithium process ends, the second step of the delithium reaction does not begin, and the inductive reactance tends to be stable. However, after 4.5 V, the simple intercalation process basically ends, while the process related to phase transition may cause microscopic changes in the electrode, resulting in the gradual reduction of inductance and finally disappearing in the discharge process.
As for the specific causes of inductive reactance, there are generally two explanations: one is that the formation of uneven SEI film on the surface of electrode materials leads to the uneven transmission of lithium ions, resulting in a local concentration difference of lithium ions on the surface of the electrode, forming an induced electromotive force, which can well explain the mechanism of inductive reactance in the EIS of a Si negative electrode [
29]. Second, due to the inhomogeneity of lithium ions in the delithiation/lithiation process, the amount of lithium ion delithiation/lithiation is different among particles of different active materials, resulting in Li-rich and Li-poor ranges and producing concentrated batteries. This explanation has also been well verified in positive electrode materials LiCo
2 and LiMn
2 O
4 [
30,
31]. However, the electric field generated by the local current between the two electrodes in the battery with the above local concentration differences will oppose the electric field in the process of lithium ion delithiation/lithiation, thus preventing the delithiation/lithiation of lithium ions in the electrode material and negatively affecting the electrochemical activity and performance of the battery’s electrode material. In addition, multiple indicators suggest that the generation mechanisms of inductive reactance in different electrode materials differ. Studying the generation mechanisms of inductive reactance across different electrode materials and analyzing their dependence on temperature and electrode polarization potential can offer theoretical guidance for analyzing battery failures during production.