Next Article in Journal
Economic Value of Li-ion Energy Storage System in Frequency Regulation Application from Utility Firm’s Perspective in Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Performance of Electrical Transmission Tower Structure Using Connected Foundation in Soft Ground
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 8
Issue 6
10.3390/en8064983
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

DC Flashover Performance of Ice-Covered Composite Insulators with Parallel Air Gaps

by
Jianlin Hu
1,*,
Xingliang Jiang
1,
Fanghui Yin
2 and
Zhijin Zhang
1
1
State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipments & System Security and New Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
2
NSERC/Hydro-Quebec/UQAC Industrial Chair on Atmospheric Icing of Power Network Equipment (CIGELE) and Canada Research Chair on Engineering of Power Network Atmospheric Icing (INGIVRE), Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2015, 8(6), 4983-4999; https://doi.org/10.3390/en8064983
Submission received: 16 March 2015 / Accepted: 22 May 2015 / Published: 28 May 2015
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
DC flashover performance of ice-covered composite insulators with a parallel air gap (CI/PAG) is an important technical consideration when such insulators are used to isolate ground wires for the purpose of DC ice-melting. Tests on tension and suspension types of CI/PAG were thus carried out in the artificial climate chamber to investigate their DC icing flashover performance. The influences of parallel air gap, ice thickness, pollution severity and air pressure on DC negative 50% flashover voltage (U50%) of CI/PAG were investigated. Test results show that the parallel air gap affected both the discharge path and U50%. With increasing ice thickness, U50% declined by up to 52%; this effect was more evident when the breakdown occurred in the air gap. The pollution severity affected U50% only when the flashover happened along insulator surface. With a decrease of atmospheric pressure, U50% decreased. U50% and the ratio of air pressure were in a power function relationship with a positive characteristic exponent which was relevant to the discharge path.

1. Introduction

Icing, an extreme weather condition, is a severe threat to the safe operation of overhead transmission lines around the world. The power lines in the US, Canada, Russia, France, Iceland, and Japan have suffered destructive snow and ice disasters during their history [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In China, icing accidents of transmission lines occur frequently due to miscellaneous macroclimatic, microtopographical and micrometeorological weather conditions. In particular in 2008, a severe ice storm struck Southern China, resulting in the collapse of 8381 transmission line towers (110 kV class and above) and accidents such as blackouts which caused huge economic losses [8].
DC ice-melting for conductors is one of the effective methods to prevent conductor fracture and tower collapse caused by icing on transmission lines [3]. In recent years, DC ice-melting techniques for overhead power transmission line conductors have well developed, and the State Grid Corporation of China and China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd. have installed dozens of fixed and movable DC ice-melting devices, which have successfully implemented hundreds of DC ice-melting tasks for transmission line conductors [9,10,11,12]. However, ground wires cannot be directly de-iced with DC ice-melting method due to their intrinsic characteristics, such as tower-after-tower grounding, single-point grounding, multi-points grounding and low insulation level. If the icing on ground wires cannot be removed or melted, ground wires are liable to displacement, fracture, or excessive sag which can cause phase-to-ground discharge and finally outages of the transmission lines.
It is necessary to enhance the insulation of ground wires for the DC ice-melting purpose. Meanwhile, for the sake of lightning protection, ground wire insulators should be installed with a parallel air gap in which breakdown occurs first when they undergo lightning strike. During the DC ice-melting process, the ice-melting voltage, which determines the current and the length of ground wires in terms of ice-melting, is limited by the flashover voltage of ice-covered insulators and the breakdown voltage of parallel air gap. Therefore, it is important to select the optimal length of ground wire insulators and the distance of parallel air gap.
Up to now, research institutes have conducted numerous investigations on the icing flashover performance of insulators and have achieved a consensus on the effects of insulator length, ice thickness, conductivity of freezing water, pollution severity on insulator surface and air pressure on the flashover performance of ice-covered composite insulators [1,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, there are no reported studies on the DC flashover performance of ice-covered insulators with parallel air gap.
The lack of related knowledge has motivated the present study which aims to investigate the icing performance of CI/PAG. The paper investigated two types of CI/PAGs, and studied their DC negative flashover performance under the conditions of various air gap distances, ice thicknesses, pollution severities, and atmospheric pressures in the artificial climate chamber. This research may pave the way for the ground-wire insulation design applied to ground wire DC ice-melting.

2. Test Facilities, Samples, and Test Methods

2.1. Test Facilities

The tests were carried out in the artificial climate chamber of State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology, College of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University. The artificial climate chamber has a diameter of 7.8 m and a height of 11.6 m. It mainly consists of a refrigeration system, a vacuum-pumping system, a spraying system, and a wind velocity regulating system. Air temperature in the artificial climate chamber is controlled by a proportional integral and differential system with a precision of about ±0.5 °C. Minimum temperature in the chamber can be adjusted to −45 ± 1 °C. Air pressure in the chamber can be as low as 30 kPa, capable of simulating the atmospheric conditions at an altitude of 7000 m. The spraying system consists of two rows of fog nozzles and mounted on an oscillating support parallel to the axis of the insulators at a distance of 3.5 m. The spraying system is 3.36 m high and 0.43 m wide. The oscillating movement helps keep the mean liquid water content approximately constant along the vertical axis of the insulators, thus forming ice with a uniform thickness along the insulator string. A relatively uniform wind is obtained using a system of 10 fans placed in a tapering box with a diffusing honeycomb panel. Wind velocity in the chamber can be adjusted to 0 to 12 m/s.
The test voltage was supplied by ±600 kV/0.5 A cascade rectifying circuit controlled by the thyristor voltage-current feedback system. The technical parameters of DC test power supply are as follows: power supply = AC 10 kV, maximum output voltage = 600 kV, ripple factor of the test voltage for a 500 mA current with a resistive load <3%, relative voltage drop occurring during individual tests resulting in withstand ≤5%, and relative voltage overshoot due to load-release caused by the extinction of electrical discharges on insulator surface ≤8%. The test voltage was measured by ZGF-600 resistive potential divider with a precision of 0.5% (for more details see [19]).

2.2. Test Samples

This research investigated two types of CI/PAGs, namely FXBZW-±25/120B and FXBZW-±25/120C, which are typical composite insulators for ground wires of overhead power transmission lines. Parameters and structure diagram of the samples are listed in Table 1 and Figure 1, where H is the insulator’s structure height; h1 is the insulation length; h is the distance of parallel air gap and L is the insulator’s creepage distance.
Table
Table 1. The parameters of two types of test samples.
Table 1. The parameters of two types of test samples.
SampleTypeStructure height H (mm)Insulation length h1 (mm)Air gap distance h (mm)Creepage distance L (mm)Mounting type
AFXBZW-±25/120B60033920~1201100Tension
BFXBZW-±25/120C59033920~1201100Suspension

2.3. Test Procedure and Methods

The main procedures of the icing flashover experiment include: preparation of tested samples, artificial pollution, ice deposit, and flashover tests for ice-covered insulators. The details are presented in [19].
Energies 08 04983 g001 1024
Figure 1. The structural graph of tested CI/PAG. (a) FXBZW-±25/120B; (b) FXBZW-±25/120C.
Figure 1. The structural graph of tested CI/PAG. (a) FXBZW-±25/120B; (b) FXBZW-±25/120C.
Energies 08 04983 g001
The ice deposit parameters are listed in Table 2. Under such conditions, the density of wet-grown ice formed on the composite insulators ranged from approximately 0.84 to 0.90 g/cm3. It is the most dangerous type of ice known as wet-grown ice or glaze with the highest probability of flashover. The average ice thickness (d) on a monitoring rotating cylinder was adopted as a parameter to represent the ice thickness on insulators. The cylinder had a diameter of 28 mm and rotated at 1 rpm. It was installed near the test samples within the water spraying zone.
Table
Table 2. Experimental parameters of ice deposits.
Table 2. Experimental parameters of ice deposits.
Freezing water conductivity (µS/cm) (20 °C)Freezing water flux (L/h·m2)Air temperature (°C)Wind velocity (m/s)
100~90−7~−5~3
The up-and-down method was chosen to obtain the 50% icing flashover voltage (U50%), and the detailed procedure is as follows: (a) Spraying was carried out until the desired ice thickness; (b) insulators were frozen for 15–20 min; (c) the cooling system was shut down; (d) the temperature in the chamber was increased by 2‒3 °C/h; (e) the estimated flashover voltage was applied to the iced insulators when the ambient temperature in the artificial chamber reached the range from −1.0 to 0.5 °C. After that, the voltage determined by the previous test was applied to the another sample. If there was withstand in the previous test, the next test voltage was increased by ∆U. Otherwise, the next voltage was decreased by ∆U. The voltage step ∆U was about 5% of the initial voltage. Voltage was applied to each sample once. The withstand was defined as no flashover for at least 30 min. The first test that yields a result different from the preceding ones and the following tests are defined as “valid” tests. Under each condition, valid tests were carried out not less than 10 times. According to the test results, U50% and the standard deviation can be calculated by:
{ U 50 ％ = ∑ i = 1 N U ( i ) / N σ = ∑ i = 1 N ( U ( i ) − U 50 % ) 2 / N
where U(i) is the applied voltage of the ith test in kV; N is the total number of valid tests.
The previous research [17,20,21] shows that the pollution and icing flashover voltages of insulators under negative DC voltage are lower than those under positive DC voltage. In addition, since the parallel air gap of the tested insulators is a symmetrical rod-rod configuration, the breakdown process under DC voltage is not obviously affected by polarity. Therefore, the DC negative voltage which is the worst case was selected in this study. External insulation design based on these test results will be more reliable due to the extra safety margin.

3. Test Results and Analysis

3.1. Test Results

In the experiment, the tested CI/PAGs were laid out according to the actual arrangement of transmission lines. Sample A was horizontally placed and the parallel air gap was in horizontaldirection with its metal fittings mounted vertically. Sample B was vertically placed and the parallel air gap was in horizontal direction.
Energies 08 04983 g002 1024
Figure 2. Icing states of two types of samples. (a) FXBZW-±25/120B, h = 80 mm, d = 10 mm; (b) FXBZW-±25/120B, h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm; (c) FXBZW-±25/120C, h = 80 mm; (d) FXBZW-±25/120C, h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm.
Figure 2. Icing states of two types of samples. (a) FXBZW-±25/120B, h = 80 mm, d = 10 mm; (b) FXBZW-±25/120B, h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm; (c) FXBZW-±25/120C, h = 80 mm; (d) FXBZW-±25/120C, h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm.
Energies 08 04983 g002
To simulate the worst weather conditions, the parallel air gap was on the windward side during icing. The conditions of the tests are as follows: the pre-pollution salt deposit densities (SDD) of the tested insulators before icing were 0.05 and 0.08 mg/cm2 respectively. The ratio of SDD to non-soluble deposit density (NSDD) was fixed at 1:6. The atmospheric pressure P was fixed at 98.7 kPa. The ice thicknesses d of the monitoring conductor were 10 and 20 mm respectively. The distances of parallel air gaps were 40, 60, 80 and 100 mm respectively. Some pictures of tested samples are shown in Figure 2. The 50% flashover voltages obtained under DC negative are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.
Table
Table 3. The test results of Sample A (P = 98.7 kPa).
Table 3. The test results of Sample A (P = 98.7 kPa).
h (mm)d (mm)SDD/NSDD (mg/cm2)U50% (kV)Standard deviation σ%Discharge path
40100.05/0.3044.75.3Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4843.76.1Air gap breakdown
200.05/0.3034.55.7Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4835.36.9Air gap breakdown
60100.05/0.3057.64.8Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4856.45.0Air gap breakdown
200.05/0.3046.25.9Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4845.66.3Air gap breakdown
80100.05/0.3072.85.1Flashover on insulator
0.08/0.4863.45.9Flashover on insulator
200.05/0.3051.74.4Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4852.66.0Flashover on insulator
100100.05/0.3071.34.4Flashover on insulator
0.08/0.4864.65.0Flashover on insulator
200.05/0.3059.24.0Flashover on insulator
0.08/0.4853.86.9Flashover on insulator
Table
Table 4. The test results of Sample B (P = 98.7 kPa).
Table 4. The test results of Sample B (P = 98.7 kPa).
h (mm)d (mm)SDD/NSDD (mg/cm2)U50% (kV)Standard deviation σ%Discharge path
40100.05/0.3024.27.3Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4822.98.3Air gap breakdown
200.05/0.3013.29.7Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4814.19.2Air gap breakdown
60100.05/0.3039.85.8Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4840.26.1Air gap breakdown
200.05/0.3020.26.9Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4818.27.2Air gap breakdown
80100.05/0.3047.34.3Flashover on insulator
0.08/0.4843.35.9Flashover on insulator
200.05/0.3035.55.8Air gap breakdown
0.08/0.4833.96.3Flashover on insulator
100100.05/0.3046.95.5Flashover on insulator
0.08/0.4842.64.5Flashover on insulator
200.05/0.3039.85.2Flashover on insulator
0.08/0.4835.24.5Flashover on insulator
In order to analyze the influences of high altitude and low air pressure on the icing flashover performance of CI/PAG, contrast tests were carried out on both types of CI/PAGs. Within this study, SDD was 0.08 mg/cm2, air pressure was set at 89.8 and 79.5 kPa which simulated altitudes of 1000 m and 2000 m, respectively. The icing thickness was fixed at 20 mm. The test results are shown in Table 5.
Table
Table 5. The test results under low air pressure conditions (SDD = 0.08 mg/cm2, d = 20 mm).
Table 5. The test results under low air pressure conditions (SDD = 0.08 mg/cm2, d = 20 mm).
Sampleh (mm)P (kPa)U50% (kV)Standard deviation σ%Discharge path
A6089.841.54.9Air gap breakdown
79.538.46.7Air gap breakdown
8089.849.45.9Flashover on insulator
79.546.56.1Flashover on insulator
B6089.816.77.9Air gap breakdown
79.515.48.2Air gap breakdown
8089.831.86.7Flashover on insulator
79.530.16.2Flashover on insulator

3.2. Influence of Parallel Air Gap

As shown in Table 3 and Table 4, the influence of parallel air gap on DC flashover performance of iced-covered CI/PAG mainly includes two aspects: the discharge path in the flashover process and the 50% flashover voltage.
In the tests, when the distances of parallel air gap were set at 40 and 60 mm, all the breakdowns occurred in the parallel air gaps. The discharge paths are shown in Figure 3a,b and Figure 4a,b. With the same ice thickness and SDD, the 50% flashover voltage increased with an increase of parallel gap distance. In such a case, SDD had a negligible impact on 50% flashover voltage.
Energies 08 04983 g003 1024
Figure 3. The different discharge paths of Sample A. (a) h = 40 mm, air gap breakdown; (b) h = 60 mm, air gap breakdown; (c) h = 80 mm, d = 10 mm, flashover on insulator; (d) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, flashover on insulator; (e) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, air gap breakdown; (f) h = 100 mm, flashover on insulator.
Figure 3. The different discharge paths of Sample A. (a) h = 40 mm, air gap breakdown; (b) h = 60 mm, air gap breakdown; (c) h = 80 mm, d = 10 mm, flashover on insulator; (d) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, flashover on insulator; (e) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, air gap breakdown; (f) h = 100 mm, flashover on insulator.
Energies 08 04983 g003
For example, the U50% of Sample A was 44.7 kV, with h of 40 mm, d of 10 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2. However, when SDD was increased to 0.08 mg/cm2, with all the other parameters remaining the same, the U50% decreased to 43.7 kV with a difference of only 1 kV. The U50% of Sample B was 24.2 kV with h of 40 mm, d of 10 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2. When SDD was increased to 0.08 mg/cm2, the U50% was reduced to 22.9 kV, with a difference of 1.3 kV. These differences are within the experimental tolerances.
When the distances of parallel air gap were 80 and 100 mm, the icing flashover of these two types of CI/PAGs mainly occurred along the iced insulators, as shown in Figure 3c–f and Figure 4c,e,f. There was an exception that with h of 80 mm, d of 20 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2, the breakdown occurred in the parallel air gap, as shown in Figure 4d. When the flashover took place along the surface of iced insulators, the distance of parallel air gap had a negligible impact on U50%. For example, the U50% of Sample A was 72.8 kV with h of 80 mm, d of 10 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2. However, when h was increased to100 mm, the U50% was reduced to 71.3 kV with a difference of 1.5 kV; The U50% of Sample B was 47.3 kV with h of 80 mm, d of 10 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2. When h was increased to 100 mm, the U50% was 46.9 kV, resulting in a difference of only 0.4 kV.
Energies 08 04983 g004 1024
Figure 4. The different discharge paths of Sample B. (a) h = 40 mm, air gap breakdown; (b) h = 60 mm, air gap breakdown; (c) h = 80 mm, d = 10 mm, flashover on insulator; (d) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, air gap breakdown; (e) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, flashover on insulator; (f) h = 100 mm, flashover on insulator.
Figure 4. The different discharge paths of Sample B. (a) h = 40 mm, air gap breakdown; (b) h = 60 mm, air gap breakdown; (c) h = 80 mm, d = 10 mm, flashover on insulator; (d) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, air gap breakdown; (e) h = 80 mm, d = 20 mm, flashover on insulator; (f) h = 100 mm, flashover on insulator.
Energies 08 04983 g004
For further analysis of the influence of parallel air gap on icing flashover performance of CI/PAG, this study evaluated the breakdown performance of clean insulators with different parallel air gaps or without parallel air gap under DC negative voltage. DC breakdown tests on clean insulators were carried out by raising the voltage until breakdown. The average value of five repeated test results was used as the average breakdown voltage Uav. In the tests, Sample A was horizontally arranged, and Sample B was vertically arranged. The environmental conditions were set with ambient temperature of 23 °C, air pressure of 98.7 kPa, and relative humidity of 78%. The test results are shown in Table 6. The flashover tests of ice-covered composite insulators without parallel air gap were carried out by the test method mentioned in Section 2 to obtain the U50%. In the tests, the tension insulators were horizontally arranged, and the suspension insulators were vertically arranged. The icing conditions were the same with those in Table 2. The results of U50% are shown in Table 7.
The existence of a parallel air gap provides an additional discharge path for insulators. Under the condition of multiple potential discharge paths, the discharge will start along the path with least resistance. Based on the comparative analysis of the test results in Table 3, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 7, it is found that: (1) for clean insulators without ice, the breakdown voltage of air gap was lower than the DC flashover voltage of insulators when the parallel air gap spacing was between 20–120 mm. As a result, all of the breakdowns took place at the parallel air gap; (2) after the insulators were iced, the metal fittings of parallel gap were also covered with ice as shown in Figure 2. The gap consists of two parts: ice layer and air gap between ice layers. Since the electrical conductivity of the ice layer is much higher than that of the air [20], the breakdown voltage of parallel gap is mainly determined by the distance of air gap between ice layers. In the tests, the distance of the air gap between ice layers of the parallel gap was measured every time ice accreted. Take the Sample A for example, with h = 40 mm and d = 20 mm, the average distance of the remaining air gap was about 14 mm. The greatly shortened air gap distance led to the decrease of breakdown voltage which was lower than the flashover voltage of 55.8 kV for iced insulator without parallel air gap, and resulted in the breakdown in the gap afterward. When h = 100 mm and d = 20 mm, the average value of the remaining air gap was about 72 mm. The breakdown voltage was higher than the flashover voltage of 55.8 kV for iced insulator without parallel air gap. As a result, the flashover took place along the surface of sample insulators.
Table
Table 6. The test results Uav of clean CI/PAG.
Table 6. The test results Uav of clean CI/PAG.
Sampleh (mm)Uav (kV)Discharge path
A2045.3Air gap breakdown
4063.6Air gap breakdown
6076.2Air gap breakdown
8080.8Air gap breakdown
10092.0Air gap breakdown
12099.4Air gap breakdown
C2035.1Air gap breakdown
4049.9Air gap breakdown
6059.7Air gap breakdown
8066.8Air gap breakdown
10074.4Air gap breakdown
12083.2Air gap breakdown
Table
Table 7. The 50% DC flashover voltages of ice-covered composite insulators without parallel air gap.
Table 7. The 50% DC flashover voltages of ice-covered composite insulators without parallel air gap.
Sampled (mm)SDD/NSDD (mg/cm2)U50% (kV)Standard deviations (σ%)
A100.05/0.3075.13.5
0.08/0.4866.24.9
200.05/0.3062.64.8
0.08/0.4855.84.4
B100.05/0.3049.45.1
0.08/0.4845.94.8
200.05/0.3042.85.9
0.08/0.4838.36.0
According to the analysis above, the distance of the parallel gap influences the icing discharge path. When the gap distance was short, for example, less than 60 mm in the tests for both types of CI/PAGs, the discharge took place at the parallel gap. The flashover voltage is determined by air gap distances and ice thickness.
In addition, test results in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 7 show that even the flashover took place along the insulator surface, and the CI/PAG had a lower 50% flashover voltage compared with CI without parallel gap. Take Sample A as an example, when h = 100 mm, d = 20 mm and SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2, the U50% of Sample A CI/PAG was 59.2 kV and the U50% of Sample A composite insulator without parallel gap was 62.6 kV. The former is 5.4% lower than the latter. For Sample B, when h = 100 mm, d = 20 mm and SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2, the U50% of Sample B CI/PAG was 39.8 kV and the U50% of Sample B composite insulator without parallel air gap was 42.8 kV. The former is 7.0% lower than the latter. It is observed that the main reason for the decrease of the 50% flashover voltage of ice-covered CI/PAGs is that the metal fittings change the ice morphology of the insulators. As shown in Figure 2, the downward development of the icicles of the horizontal parallel metal fittings of tension insulators make the insulator sheds more likely to be bridged by icicles; the icicles on the parallel metal fittings of the suspension insulator bridge some sheds and decrease the flashover voltage. In conclusion, as for CI/PAG, when the gap is relatively large, flashover happens along the iced insulator’s surface. Since the influence of parallel metal fittings on U50% cannot be ignored, the ordinary iced insulator’s 50% voltage gradient cannot be used for reference in terms of the configuration design of CI/PAG.

3.3. Influence of Ice Thickness on U50%

The available research results show that the flashover voltages of ordinary insulators decrease with the increase of the ice thickness d and the U50% can be expressed as a power function of d with a negative characteristic exponent [1,13,18,19]. The test results in this study also reveal that with an increased ice thickness d, the U50%s of iced CI/PAGs decreases gradually. However, due to the influence of parallel air gap on the discharge path, the influence of ice thickness on U50% is different when breakdown happens in the parallel air gap or along the insulator surface. When the parallel air gap is relatively short, the breakdown occurs in the parallel air gap. As icing reduces the remaining air gap distance of the parallel air gap, the ice thickness has a significant influence on the air gap breakdown voltage. For example: for Sample A with h of 40 mm, the average flashover voltage Uav was 63.6 kV without icing; for SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 and d = 10 mm, the U50% was 44.7 kV, whereas the U50% was only 34.5 kV when breakdown occurred in parallel air gap with a d of 20 mm. Compared with sample without icing, U50%s of samples with d of 10 and 20 mm declined by 29.7% and 45.8% respectively. For Sample B with h of 40 mm, the average flashover voltage Uav was 49.9 kV without icing. For SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 and d = 10 mm, the U50% was 24.2 kV; when breakdown happened at the parallel air gap with d of 20 mm, the U50% was only 13.2 kV. Compared with sample without icing, U50% of samples with d of 10 and 20 mm declined by 51.5% and 73.6% respectively. Based on the above analysis, the ice thickness exhibits more effects on DC negative flashover voltage of Sample B than on that of Sample A. When the parallel air gap distance is relatively large and flashover occurs along the insulator surface, the influence of ice thickness d on U50% of CI/PAG is the same as that of ordinary ice-covered composite insulators [17,18,19,20]. For Sample A with h of 100 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2, when d = 10 mm, the U50% was 71.3 kV; when d = 20 mm, the U50% was 59.2 kV, with the latter dropping by 16.7%. For Sample B with h of 100 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2, when d = 10 mm, the U50% was 46.9 kV; when d = 20 mm, the U50% was 39.8 kV, with the latter dropping by 15.1%. Since only two ice thicknesses were tested in this study, it is insufficient to obtain the characteristic exponent of ice thickness and more research is still needed in the future.

3.4. Influence of SDD on U50%

The pre-pollution severity of iced insulators is a significant factor which influences the flashover performance of ice-covered insulators. For ordinary insulators, with the increase of contamination parameter SDD, U50% decreases accordingly in a power function [18,19]. The test results in Table 3 and Table 4 present that when air gap breakdown occurs on the ice-covered CI/PAG, there are some deviations as to the U50% under different SDDs, but such differences are small and within the experimental tolerances. Thus it can be concluded that U50% is not affected by SDD when breakdown occurs in the parallel air gap. However, when the flashover occurs along the surface of ice-covered insulator, U50% decreases with an increase of SDD. For example, for Sample A with h of 100 mm and d of 10 mm, when SDD was 0.05 mg/cm2, the U50% was 71.3 kV; when SDD was increased to 0.08 mg/cm2, the U50% was 64.6 kV with an decrease of 9.3%; for Sample B with h of 100 mm and d of 10 mm, when SDD was 0.05 mg/cm2, the U50% was 46.9 kV; when SDD was increased to 0.08 mg/cm2 the U50% was 42.6 kV, with the latter decreasing by 9.2%, so, when the discharge path is along the insulator surface, the influence of SDD on U50% of ice-covered CI/PAGs is consistent with that of ordinary ice-covered composite insulators [18,19].

3.5. Influence of P on U50%

The previous research results show that with an increase of altitude and a decrease of air pressure, both 50% breakdown voltage of air gap and 50% flashover voltage of polluted or ice-covered insulator decrease. There is a nonlinear relationship between the 50% discharge voltage U50% and air pressure P, shown as follows [18,19,20]:
U 50% = U 0 × ( P / P 0 ) n
where U50% and U0, in kV, are the 50% breakdown voltage of air gap or flashover voltage of the insulator under air pressure P and P0 respectively. P0 is the standard atmospheric pressure with a value of 101.3 kPa; n is a characteristic exponent representing the influence of air pressure.
Fit the corresponding test results of Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 according to Equation (2), the fitted curves obtained are shown in Figure 5, the corresponding U0, n and the correlation coefficients R2 are shown in Table 8. Based on Figure 5 and Table 8, the following can be concluded:
(1) The U50%s of two types of ice-covered CI/PAGs decrease with the decrease of air pressure, no matter whether the discharge is located in parallel air gap or along ice-covered insulator surface. U50% and ratio of air pressure (P/P0) are in a power function relationship with a positive characteristic exponent.
(2) The characteristic exponent n of pressure influence is related to the discharge path. For the two types of CI/PAGs, when the parallel air gap distance was 60 mm in which condition the breakdown occurred in the parallel gap, the characteristic exponents n were 0.787 and 0.767 respectively. When the parallel gap distance was 80 mm (namely, the flashover occurs on ice-covered insulator surface), the characteristic exponents n were 0.566 and 0.545 respectively. The n of parallel gap breakdown is, therefore, larger than that of flashover on insulators, which indicates that the air pressure has bigger influence on U50% of parallel gap breakdown than that of flashover along the insulator.
Energies 08 04983 g005 1024
Figure 5. The relationship curves between the U50% and P/P0.
Figure 5. The relationship curves between the U50% and P/P0.
Energies 08 04983 g005
Table
Table 8. Fitting Values of U0, n, and R2 According to the Test Results in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 with Equation (2).
Table 8. Fitting Values of U0, n, and R2 According to the Test Results in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 with Equation (2).
Sampleh (mm)Fitting values
U0 (kV)nR2
A6046.20.7870.984
8053.20.5660.993
B6018.50.7670.992
8034.20.5450.987

3.6. Icing Flashover Voltage Gradients

Insulator flashover voltage gradient is a crucial parameter for the insulation design. According to the test results in Table 3 and Table 4, for tension and suspension CI/PAGs with h of 40 or 60 mm and d of 10 or 20 mm, all breakdowns happened at parallel gap and U50% were mainly determined by the distance of parallel gaps. When h was 80 or 100 mm under the above two ice thicknesses, the discharge all occurred with flashover on insulators except the breakdown at the parallel gap with h of 80 mm, d of 20 mm and SDD of 0.05 mg/cm2. Therefore, the flashover voltage gradients for ice-covered insulators are analyzed in two situations, namely the breakdown in parallel gap and flashover on insulator.

3.6.1. Voltage Gradients under the Condition of Air Gap Breakdown

When the breakdown happens in parallel air gap, the breakdown voltage is mainly determined by the gap distance and the ice thickness. Then the flashover voltage gradient Eg of the ice-covered CI/PAG is presented as:
E g = U 50 % / h
where Eg is the 50% flashover voltage gradient of ice-covered CI/PAG under the condition of breakdown in parallel gap, in kV/mm; U50% is the corresponding 50% flashover voltage obtained from the tests, in kV; h is the distance of parallel air gap, in mm. According to Equation (3) and test results in Table 3 and Table 4, the flashover voltage gradients Eg of the iced CI/PAG are calculated in Table 9.
Table
Table 9. Flashover voltage gradients Eg of the ice-covered CI/PAG (air gap breakdown).
Table 9. Flashover voltage gradients Eg of the ice-covered CI/PAG (air gap breakdown).
Sampleh (mm)d (mm)SDD/NSDD (mg/cm2)Eg (kV/mm)
A40100.05/0.301.118
0.08/0.481.093
200.05/0.300.863
0.08/0.480.883
60100.05/0.300.960
0.08/0.480.940
200.05/0.300.770
0.08/0.480.760
B40100.05/0.300.605
0.08/0.480.573
200.05/0.300.330
0.08/0.480.353
60100.05/0.300.663
0.08/0.480.670
200.05/0.300.337
0.08/0.480.303
Based on Table 9, the following can be concluded:
(1) Under the condition of breakdown in parallel air gap, the flashover voltage gradient Eg is mainly determined by the ice thickness and is irrelevant to the pollution severity SDD.
(2) For Sample A, parallel air gap distance affects Eg to a certain extent under the same contamination condition. Take the contamination condition of SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 for example, when the parallel air gap spacing h was 40 and 60 mm, Eg was 1.118 and 0.960 kV/mm respectively with a difference of 14.1%; for Sample B, the gap distance h has less influence on Eg under the same condition. In the case of SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 and with h of 40 and 60 mm, Eg was 0.605 and 0.663 kV/mm respectively and the difference was 9.6%. The main reason for the influence of gap distance on Eg may be the nonlinear growth of ice in the parallel air gap.
(3) The Eg is influenced significantly by the ice thickness d and the Eg of Sample B is more affected by d than that of Sample A. For Sample A with h of 40 mm, the Eg decreased by 21.1% with an increase of d from 10 to 20 mm; for Sample B with h of 40 mm, when d increased from 10 to 20 mm, the Eg declined by 42%.
(4) The Eg of Sample B is significantly lower than that of Sample A under the same conditions, which can be explained from two aspects: First, the different metal fitting types lead to different electric-field distributions of air gap, and for Sample A, a relatively uniform electric field increases the breakdown voltage of tension insulator; Second, there exist different icing patterns for the two kinds of CI/PAGs due to their different metal fittings and layout types.

3.6.2. Voltage Gradients under the Condition of Flashover on Insulator

When it comes to flashover along the insulator surface, U50% is mainly determined by insulation length, ice thickness and contamination severity. The flashover voltage gradient E50% can be calculated by the following equation:
E 5 0 % = U 50 % / h 1
where E50% is the 50% flashover voltage gradient of ice-covered CI/PAG when flashover occurs along the surface of insulator, in kV/cm; U50% is the 50% flashover voltage obtained from the tests, in kV; h1 is the metal to metal dry arc distance of the composite insulator, in mm. According to Equation (4), E50% of the ice-covered CI/PAG is calculated in Table 10 based on the corresponding flashover test results from Table 3 and Table 4.
Table
Table 10. Flashover voltage gradients E50% of ice-covered CI/PAG (flashover on insulator).
Table 10. Flashover voltage gradients E50% of ice-covered CI/PAG (flashover on insulator).
Sampleh (mm)d (mm)SDD/NSDD (mg/cm2)Eg (kV/mm)
A80100.05/0.300.215
0.08/0.480.187
200.05/0.30/
0.08/0.480.155
100100.05/0.300.210
0.08/0.480.191
200.05/0.300.175
0.08/0.480.159
B80100.05/0.300.140
0.08/0.480.128
200.05/0.30/
0.08/0.480.100
100100.05/0.300.138
0.08/0.480.126
200.05/0.300.117
0.08/0.480.104
Based on Table 10, the following can be concluded:
(1) Under the condition of flashover on insulators, the E50% is mainly determined by the ice thickness d and contamination severity SDD. It is free from the effect of the air gap distance h. Take d of 10 mm as an example, when SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2, h = 80 mm or h = 100 mm, E50% was 0.215 or 0.210 kV/mm respectively.
(2) The SDD affects the E50% under the same ice thickness condition. For Sample A, take d of 10 mm as an example. In the case of SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 and SDD = 0.08 mg/cm2, the average value of E50% was 0.213 and 0.189 kV/mm respectively, the average E50% of the latter was 11.3% less than that of the former; for Sample B, take d of 10 mm as an example, in the case of SDD = 0.05 mg/cm2 and SDD = 0.08 mg/cm2, the average value of E50% was 0.139 and 0.127 kV/mm respectively, with a decrease of 8.6%.
(3) E50% of Sample B is more influenced by ice thickness than that of Sample A. For Sample A, in the case of SDD = 0.08 mg/cm2, E50% dropped by 17.2% with the increase of d from 10 to 20 mm; for Sample B, E50% dropped by 19.7% with the increase of d from 10 to 20 mm.
(4) E50% of Sample B is significantly lower than that of Sample A under the same conditions, which is consistent with the results of two kinds of ordinary insulators. The withstand voltage gradient of suspension insulator is also lower than that of the tension insulator under the same condition.

4. Conclusions

This study presented the test results of negative DC flashover performance of ice-covered CI/PAG under the conditions of various air gap distances, ice thicknesses, pollution severities, and atmospheric pressures in the artificial climate chamber. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
(1) The distance of parallel air gap affects the discharge path of ice-covered CI/PAGs. When the air gap distance is relatively small, such as h of no more than 60 mm, the breakdown happens in the parallel gap and U50% increases with the increasing air gap distance. Even if the parallel air gap distance is relatively large and the flashover happens on insulator surfaces, due to the influences of metal fittings, the negative DC flashover voltage U50% of iced CI/PAG is lower than that of insulators without the parallel gap under the same conditions. For Sample A, the difference was from 3% to 5.7%, and for Sample B that was from 4.2% to 11.5%.
(2) U50% decreases with an increase of d. When h is relatively small and the breakdown happens in the parallel air gap: for Sample A, when d was increased from 10 to 20 mm, the average value of U50% had a decrease range from 19% to 21%; for Sample B when d was increased from 10 to 20 mm, the average value of U50% had a decrease range from 42% to 52%. When the h is relatively large (more than 60 mm), the flashover occurs on iced insulator surface and the influence of d on U50% is consistent with the pattern for ordinary ice-covered insulators.
(3) Pre-pollution SDD only affects U50% when the flashover happens on iced insulator surface and its influences are consistent with those on the ordinary ice-covered insulators.
(4) The U50% of two discharge paths both decline with a decrease of air pressure. U50% and the ratio of air pressure (P/P0) are in a power function relationship with a positive characteristic exponent. Characteristic exponent n is related to the discharge path. The n of air gap breakdown is larger than that of flashover on insulators. It means that the air pressure has a bigger influence on U50% of air gap breakdown than that of flashover on insulators.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the financial supports provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51107152), the Funds for Innovative Research Groups of China (No. 51321063), and the Foundation of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China (FANEDD) (No. 201240), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. CDJZR12150014).

Author Contributions

Jianlin Hu carried out the experiments, analyzed the test results, and wrote this paper. Xingliang Jiang gave input to the analysis of test results. Fanghui Yin checked the language and revise the contents of this manuscript. Zhijin Zhang organized the experimental setup and measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farzaneh, M.; Kiernicki, J. Flashover problems caused by ice build-up on insulators. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 1995, 11, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Farzaneh, M.; Savadjiev, K. Statistical analysis of field data for precipitation icing accretion on overhead power lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2005, 20, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Farzaneh, M. Atmospheric Icing of Power Networks; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 1–4, 236–252, 271–278, 327–341. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sklenicka, V.; Vokalek, J. Insulators in icing conditions: Selection and measures for reliability increasing. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada, 3–7 June 1996; pp. 72–76.
  5. Kannus, K.; Lahti, K. Electrical behaviour of high voltage insulator strings under rime ice. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures, Chester, UK, 5–8 June 2000; p. 8.
  6. Fujimura, T.; Natio, K.; Hasegawa, Y.; Kawaguchi, T. Performance of insulators covered with snow or ice. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1979, PAS-98, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matsuda, H.; Komuro, H.; Takasu, K. Withstand voltage characteristics of insulator strings covered with snow or ice. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 1991, 6, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. China State Electricity Regulatory Commission. Annual Report on Electricity Regulation. 2008. Available online: http://www.chinapower.com.cn/article/1155/art1155234.asp (accessed on 14 March 2015).
  9. Fu, C.; Rao, H.; Li, X.L. Development and application of DC deicer. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2009, 33, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tan, Y.J.; Lu, J.Z.; Fang, Z.; Li, B.; Zhang, H.X. Study of mobile DC de-icing equipment based on uncontrolled rectification. Cent. China Electr. Power 2011, 24, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, J.J.; Fu, C.; Chen, Y.P.; Rao, H.; Xu, S.K.; Yu, T.; Li, L.C. Research and application of DC deicing technology in China Southern power grid. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2012, 27, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fu, C.; Xu, S.K.; Rao, H.; Li, X.L.; Chen, Y.P.; Li, L.C. Design and application of DC deicer for AC transmission system. High Volt. Eng. 2013, 39, 705–711. [Google Scholar]
  13. Farzaneh, M.; Drapeau, J.F. AC flashover performance of insulators covered with artificial ice. IEEE Trans. Power Del. 1995, 10, 1311–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, D.; Halsan, K.A.; Fikke, S.M. Artificial ice tests for long insulator strings. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop Atmospheric Icing of Structures, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada, 3–7 June 1996; pp. 67–71.
  15. CIGRE TF 33 04 09. In Influence of Ice and Snow on the Flashover Performance of Outdoor Insulators-Part I: Effects of Ice; Electra: London, UK, 1999; No. 187.
  16. CIGRE TF 33 04 09. In Influence of Ice and Snow on the Flashover Performance of Outdoor Insulators-Part II: Effects of Snow; Electra: London, UK, 2000; No. 188.
  17. Farzaneh, M. Effect of ice thickness and voltage polarity on the flashover voltage of ice-covered high voltage insulators. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Dresden, Germany, 28–30 August 1991; pp. 203–206.
  18. Hu, J.L.; Sun, C.X.; Jiang, X.L.; Zhang, Z.J.; Shu, L.C. Flashover performance of pre-contaminated and ice-covered composite insulators to be used in 1000 kV UHV AC transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2007, 14, 1347–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, J.L.; Sun, C.X.; Jiang, X.L.; Xiao, D.B.; Zhang, Z.J.; Shu, L.C. DC flashover performance of various types of ice-covered insulator strings at low air pressure. Energies 2012, 5, 1554–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Farzaneh, M.; Chisholm, W.A. Insulators for Icing and Polluted Environments; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 427–431. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kunhardt, E.E.; Luessen, L.H. Electrical Breakdown and Discharges in Gases (Part A: Fundamental Processes and Breakdown); Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 207–291. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, J.; Jiang, X.; Yin, F.; Zhang, Z. DC Flashover Performance of Ice-Covered Composite Insulators with Parallel Air Gaps. Energies 2015, 8, 4983-4999. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8064983

AMA Style

Hu J, Jiang X, Yin F, Zhang Z. DC Flashover Performance of Ice-Covered Composite Insulators with Parallel Air Gaps. Energies. 2015; 8(6):4983-4999. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8064983

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Jianlin, Xingliang Jiang, Fanghui Yin, and Zhijin Zhang. 2015. "DC Flashover Performance of Ice-Covered Composite Insulators with Parallel Air Gaps" Energies 8, no. 6: 4983-4999. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8064983

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop