Next Article in Journal
The Immunomodulatory CEA Cell Adhesion Molecule 6 (CEACAM6/CD66c) Is a Protein Receptor for the Influenza A Virus
Next Article in Special Issue
Screening of Bacteriophage Encoded Toxic Proteins with a Next Generation Sequencing-Based Assay
Previous Article in Journal
A Potential SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Interest (VOI) Harboring Mutation E484K in the Spike Protein Was Identified within Lineage B.1.1.33 Circulating in Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Advantages and Challenges of Using Endolysins in a Clinical Setting
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/v13050725
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Virulent Bacteriophages Infecting Mediterranean Isolates of the Plant Pest Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas albilineans

by
Fernando Clavijo-Coppens
1,2,3,
Nicolas Ginet
1,
Sophie Cesbron
2,
Martial Briand
2,
Marie-Agnès Jacques
2 and
Mireille Ansaldi
1,*
1
Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne, UMR7283, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, 13009 Marseille, France
2
Institute Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, University of Angers, 49000 Angers, France
3
Bioline-Agrosciences, Equipe R&D–Innovation, 06560 Valbonne, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(5), 725; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050725
Submission received: 10 March 2021 / Revised: 12 April 2021 / Accepted: 17 April 2021 / Published: 21 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnological Applications of Phage and Phage-Derived Proteins 2021)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Xylella fastidiosa (Xf) is a plant pathogen causing significant losses in agriculture worldwide. Originating from America, this bacterium caused recent epidemics in southern Europe and is thus considered an emerging pathogen. As the European regulations do not authorize antibiotic treatment in plants, alternative treatments are urgently needed to control the spread of the pathogen and eventually to cure infected crops. One such alternative is the use of phage therapy, developed more than 100 years ago to cure human dysentery and nowadays adapted to agriculture. The first step towards phage therapy is the isolation of the appropriate bacteriophages. With this goal, we searched for phages able to infect Xf strains that are endemic in the Mediterranean area. However, as Xf is truly a fastidious organism, we chose the phylogenetically closest and relatively fast-growing organism X. albineans as a surrogate host for the isolation step. Our results showed the isolation from various sources and preliminary characterization of several phages active on different Xf strains, namely, from the fastidiosa (Xff), multiplex (Xfm), and pauca (Xfp) subspecies, as well as on X. albilineans. We sequenced their genomes, described their genomic features, and provided a phylogeny analysis that allowed us to propose new taxonomic elements. Among the 14 genomes sequenced, we could identify two new phage species, belonging to two new genera of the Caudoviricetes order, namely, Usmevirus (Podoviridae family) and Subavirus (Siphoviridae family). Interestingly, no specific phages could be isolated from infected plant samples, whereas one was isolated from vector insects captured in a contaminated area, and several from surface and sewage waters from the Marseille area.

1. Introduction

Xylella fastidiosa (Xf) is a slow-growing Gram-negative plant-pathogenic bacterium emerging in Asia and Europe, and is therefore listed as a quarantine organism [1]. Long known in the Americas, this xylem-specialized bacterium is associated with numerous socio-economically important plant diseases. The impact of diseases due to Xylella include direct and indirect economic damages that were estimated to reach 150 million dollars per year in California when including measures to control vectors [2,3]. In the European olive oil production area, the projected impact of olive quick decline syndrome (OQDS) over 50 years ranges from two to five billion euros [4]. Nonetheless, such diseases have wider impacts; for instance, the impairment was estimated at 30% of the provision of ecosystem services provided by agroecological systems, including landscape value, cultural and natural heritage in the Puglia province of Italy [5]. Xf is transmitted by xylem sap-feeding insects and belongs to the Xanthomonadaceae (synonymous with the Lysobacteraceae) family. Xf genome has been the first plant pathogen genome sequenced, highlighting its importance as a plant pest [6]. Its genome of 2.6 Mb with a low GC content (52.7%) is smaller than that of other Xanthomonadaceae, even the ones of the phylogenetically closest relatives Xanthomonas albilineans (Xa) and X. translucens (Xt) whose genomes are composed of 3.7 and 4.7 Mb, respectively [7,8]. It is tempting to link the Xf reduced genome to its fastidious growth. Interestingly, a recent genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction analysis suggested that the Xf metabolic network is pretty much complete, although minimalist and not particularly robust [9]. Indeed, alternative reactions seem to be missing; the metabolism of the bacteria thus relies on poorly efficient metabolic pathways and lack of flexibility. Moreover, the study also found that the production of some virulence factors, such as exopolysaccharides (EPS), is at a high cost to the plant and is thus detrimental to fast growth [9].
Xf has been identified as the causative agent of Pierce’s disease, which has been causing extensive damage to vineyards in California for almost 150 years [10]. However, it was only at the end of the 1970s that this fastidious bacterium could be isolated on solid medium [11]. Since then, Xf has been associated with various forms of plant diseases on many different plant hosts [12]. Today, this bacterium belongs in the top 10 of the plant pathogens that are most studied worldwide [13]. Xf is endemic in the Americas and is persistently involved in large epidemics, causing significant damage in vineyards and citrus orchards. Listed as a quarantine pest in Europe, the three main Xf subspecies (pauca (Xfp), multiplex (Xfm) and subsp. fastidiosa (Xff)) were recently detected in Europe, in particular in the Mediterranean area, probably introduced through commercial exchanges and causing a variety of diseases such as the leaf scorch of olive trees in Italy [14]. Continuous monitoring using standardized real-time PCR protocols is now performed in southern Europe [15,16]. However, in the absence of any efficient and authorized chemical method to control Xf, a major challenge is to develop environmentally friendly biotechnologies to control this plant disease. The current strategy implemented by the European Commission to prevent Xf spread within the EU consists of eradication and containment measures involving intensive surveillance, vector control treatments, and differential removal of infected plants and specified hosts in foci and buffer zones [17]. Additional measures to these economically and socially devastating ones have been proposed, such as the selection of naturally resistant host plants, the thermal treatment of young plants, or the use of a combination of zinc, copper, manganese and citric acid [18,19,20]. Biocontrol strategies have also been proposed using avirulent Xf strains or other avirulent plant colonizers [21,22]. However, none of these later strategies has been recognized as fully efficient or totally safe by the European authorities.
Bacteriophages, the viruses infecting bacteria, have been used to treat infectious diseases since their discovery at the beginning of the twentieth century [23]. Their use in therapy has pros and cons, but the clear advantages are that they can infect antibiotic-resistant pathogens and can be adapted to any bacterial species as long as strictly virulent phages can be isolated, which can be difficult with some poorly growing species. Recently, the agricultural sciences community put a great deal of emphasis on phage therapy to develop sustainable strategies of biocontrol for plants and animals [24,25,26]. Currently, a number of phage products are being developed or are already commercially available for a variety of plant pathogens such as various Xanthomonas strains or Ralstonia solanacearum [27]. As an example, the OmniLytics™ company commercialized several phage products under the AgriPhage™ name to control tomato and pepper bacterial spot and speck caused by Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, as well as other plant diseases. In this context, a group from Texas A&M University proposed the use of bacteriophages as a treatment for Pierce’s disease [28,29,30]. Following the same line of investigation, we attempted to isolate Xf-specific phages and to focus on the three Xf subspecies present in the Mediterranean basin, since the strains currently spreading in Europe differ from the original Pierce’s disease causative strain Xff [14,16]. In order to develop phage cocktails active against specific strains of interest, i.e., Xf strains endemic in Europe, one should first constitute a collection of dedicated and specific phages, determine their genome sequences and test them in vitro as well as in vivo for their lytic activity. In this work, we started to build up a phage library that could eventually be used as biocontrol products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Media

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1 and were provided by the French Collection of Plant-associated Bacteria (CIRM-CFBP, https://www6.inrae.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria, accessed on 10 March 2021). Xf strains were cul-tured at 28 °C on modified periwinkle wilt modified medium (PWG-M agar without phenol red) [31] for up to seven days. Then, the cultures were transferred to a new plate containing PWG-M agar or B-CYE medium [32] and incubated for up to seven days at 28 °C. When required, for liquid cultures, Xf strains were incubated at 28 °C under 160 rpm agitation in PD2 broth [31]. Xanthomonas strains were cultured on YPG agar (yeast extract, 7 g l-1; peptone, 7 g l-1; glucose, 7 g l-1; agar 15 g l-1 (pH 7.0 to 7.2)) [33] for up to 24 h at 28 °C, except for X. arboricola (Xaj) and X. albilineans (Xa) cultured for two to three days at 28 °C. For liquid cultures, Xanthomonas strains were cultured in YPG broth medium (YPG without agar). The YPG soft agar medium (YPG broth with agar 7.5 g l-1) was used for X. albilineans overlays at 28 °C for up to three days. For all strains, suspensions made from fresh cultures were stored at −80 °C in YP glycerol medium (yeast extract 5 g l-1; peptone 5 g l-1; glycerol 30% v/v), except for the X. albilineans strain, which was stored directly in sterile distilled water.

2.2. Environmental Samples for Phage Isolation

Several Xylella-associated and Xylella-non associated environments were assayed for the presence of bacteriophages. For Xf-associated environments, plant samples were collected in a Corsican public space (GPS coordinates 41.912444, 8.641105), and sap-feeding insect samples (of the species Philaenus spumarius) were collected nearby (GPS coordinates 42.272662, 9.492568). Both positions are referenced as Xylella-infected locations in France [34]. Samples were sterilized on-site as follows: plant and insect extracts were macerated in 5 mL of phage buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6); 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; and 10 mM MgSO4) per gram of material. To remove large particles, the mixtures were filtered through a 320 mm Whatman® filter paper, Grade 113V. Supernatants were filtered through 0.45 μm then through 0.22 μm pore-size nylon Acrodisc® syringe filters, and then stored at 4 °C in the presence of a few drops of chloroform.
For Xylella-non-associated environments, one liter of sewage influent was collected from the wastewater treatment plant of Marseille Provence Metropole, and one liter of post-rain runoff waters was collected from Marseille Vieux-Port, France (GPS coordinates 43.2941456, 5.373712). Large particles were removed as above. Bacteriophage particles were then pelleted by high-speed centrifugation at 90,000× g for one hour at 4 °C. Pellets were suspended in 10 mL phage buffer and stored at 4 °C. Since we noticed that any chloroform addition to the samples led to a reduced number of plaques, chloroform was not added to the water samples. Runoff water sampling did not require specific permissions, whereas, for raw sewage samples, approval from Marseille Provence Metropole was obtained before sampling.

2.3. Phage Enrichment

Enrichments from the plant, insect, sewage and runoff water samples were conducted in two ways: on Xylella fastidiosa (Xf) cultures, to select directly for Xf-specific phages, and on X. albilineans (Xa) cultures to maximize our chances of isolating Xanthomonaceae-infecting phages. Xf strains were grown at 28 °C on PWG-M agar medium [31] for up to 15 days and transferred to 2 mL PD2 broth medium, to which 200 μL of pre-treated samples were added. The culture enrichments were incubated for 10 days at 28 °C without agitation. Plant and insect extracts were also enriched on the surrogate host Xa as follows: Xa strain CFBP 2523 was cultured overnight in 5 mL LPG broth at 28 °C under 160 rpm agitation. Two ml of Xa liquid culture in YPG broth was calibrated at an OD600 of 0.2 and incubated with 200 μL of pre-treated samples for two days at ~25 °C without agitation. Xa and Xf cells were then removed by centrifugation at 4000× g for 15 min, and the supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm pore-size Acrodisc® filter. Enrichment products were stored in sterile conditions at 4 °C. To be noted, filtered wastewater and runoff samples formed lysis plaques on a Xa overlay without any enrichment step. Phage enrichment was confirmed, and the phages were re-isolated using plaque assay on Xa overlays. A descriptive workflow of our strategy is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.4. Phage Isolation, Propagation and Purification

Phage activity was tested using spot assay on double agar overlay plates, using the surrogate host X. albilineans. Briefly, Xa was cultured for 8 to 12 h on YPG broth at 28 °C under 160 rpm agitation. Then, 200 μL of bacterial culture were mixed with 2.8 mL of YPG soft agar at fusion temperatures close to 50 °C. The mixture was vortexed and plated on YPG agar plates. Lytic activity was revealed by exposing Xa soft agar overlays to serial 10-fold dilutions of the enrichment products and incubated for two to three days at 28 °C. Phage-forming lysis plaques were selected and plugged off from the agar surface bottom using a 1000 µL tip, and then suspended in 500 µL of phage buffer. Re-isolation was performed on a Xa overlay at least three times, repeating plugging and suspension steps to select single plaques with a regular shape. At the third re-isolation step, phage particles were propagated by adding 100 μL of phage suspension to a 6 mL Xa liquid culture in LPG broth calibrated at an OD600 of 0.2. After two days of incubation at 28 °C under 160 rpm shaking, cells were removed by centrifugation at 5000× g for 15 min and supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm pore size Acrodisc® syringe filter. For phage purification, phage particles were pelleted at least three times by centrifugation at 20,800× g for 1 h at 4 °C, then suspended in phage buffer. Final suspensions were filtered through a 0.22 μm filter and stored in sterile conditions at 4 °C.

2.5. Negative Staining and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Phage preparations (2 mL) were pelleted by a mere centrifugation step at 20,800× g, 4 °C for one hour. Pelleted phages were washed and pelleted again three times with 2 mL of TEM-buffer (0.22 µm filtered 0.1 M NH4-acetate (pH 7)) and concentrated in a final volume of 50 μL TEM-buffer. Then, five μL drops of diluted phage suspensions (~2 × 108 PFU·mL−1) were spotted on glow discharged carbon-coated grids (EMS) and let stand for 3 min. The grids were then washed with two drops of 2% aqueous uranyl acetate and stained with a third drop for 2 min. Grids were dried on filter paper, and the samples were analyzed using a Tecnai 200 KV electron microscope (FEI). Digital acquisitions were made with a numeric camera (Eagle, FEI). Electron micrograph images were analyzed using the ImageJ software [35].

2.6. Phage Genome Sequencing and Genetic Analysis

Total phage DNA was extracted using the classical phenol/chloroform extraction method, then sequenced using the MiSeq Illumina® technology. The phage DNA li-braries were prepared using NexteraTM enzymatic fragmentation technology, a tech-nology suitable for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Paired-end reads were assembled with SOAPdenovo, version 2.04 [36] and VELVET, version 1.2.10 [36,37]. Whole se-quences were compared to the NCBI BLASTn database. Protein coding sequences, ge-nomic size and GC content were predicted by the RAST® tool [38]. Predicted CDS were compared with the NCBI BLASTp database, NCBI conserved domain database and HHpred (PDB_mmCIF73_22_May database).
Genomic comparisons were performed with shared k-mer analysis using the KI-S protocol and the similarity matrix was represented using the KI-S circle packing tool [39] available at the CIRM-CFBP Galaxy platform (https://iris.angers.inra.fr/galaxypub-cfbp/, accessed on 28 March 2019).
Phylogenetic analyses were generated by the VICTOR online tool [40] using the complete genomic sequences of the Caudovirales bacteriophages infecting Xanthomonadales present in Genbank (Supplemental Table S1). All pairwise comparisons of the amino acid sequences were conducted using the Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) and trees were inferred under settings recommended for prokaryotic viruses [40]. Taxon boundaries at the species, genus and family level were estimated with the OPTSIL program [41].

2.7. Phage Host Range

Host ranges of isolated phages were determined using the phage sensitivity spot test as follows: X. fastidiosa strains (Table 1) were cultured at 28 °C on PWG-M agar plates for up to seven days. Then, the cultures were suspended in sterile distilled water and OD600 was calibrated at 0.1 for Xfp and Xfm and 0.01 for Xff strain. Drops of 20 μL of bacterial suspensions were deposited on the surface of the B-CYE medium [31] and allowed to dry. Then, 10 μL of purified phage preparations (1010 PFU·mL−1) were deposited at the margin of the upper part of the bacterial drop. As a control for each strain, one bacterial drop did not receive any treatment, and one bacterial drop was assayed with 10 μL of phage buffer. Spots were dried at room temperature and the plates cultured for up to 10 days at 28 °C. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.8. Phage Nomenclature and Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

Phages isolated in this study were named according to the classification guide proposed by Adriaenssens and Brister [42]. Note that the names of the newly isolated phages originate from neighborhood names in the city of Bogota, Colombia. The assembled genome sequences, as well as raw reads, were deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the accession numbers listed in Table 2.

3. Results

3.1. Strategy to Isolate Xf-Specific Phages

To bypass the fastidious in vitro growth of Xf, we developed a strategy using Xa as a surrogate host to isolate phages. Using surrogate hosts for bacteriophage isolation and propagation was proposed by several studies to isolate phages against pathogenic bacteria such as S. aureus [43,44], M. tuberculosis [45], and S. enterica [46], as well as for the plant pest X. fastidiosa [28]. To select bacteriophages with a lytic activity on Xf, samples from the plant, insect, sewage and runoff waters were enriched on liquid cultures of Xff and Xfm strains. All samples were also exposed directly to Xa soft-agar overlays, either directly or previously enriched on Xa cultures. None of the plant extracts, either plated directly on to Xa lawns or after enrichments on Xff, Xfm or Xa, were able to form lysis plaques on the surrogate host overlays. In the same way, insect extracts plated directly on a Xa overlay were not capable of forming lysis plaques. In contrast, insect extracts enriched either on Xff, Xfm or Xa liquid cultures led to the isolation of viral particles able to form plaques on Xa overlays. Regarding the Xylella-non-associated environmental samples, sewage water led to the formation of numerous plaques on Xa overlays without any enrichment step, indicating a wide variety of Xa-infecting phages in these samples. The same situation was observed for the sewage samples previously enriched on Xff and Xfm. We re-isolated six plaques of each X. fastidiosa enrichments (6 + 6) and 12 for Xa control enrichment (Table 3). Runoff water samples enriched on Xff and Xfm did not form any plaque on Xa overlays, while raw extracts were able to form plaques without a prior enrichment step. Eight phage plaques were re-isolated in this way. Two phage genomes obtained in each experiment were sequenced immediately, leading to an initial set of 14 sequenced phage genomes.
Based on their DNA sequences, we divided this initial set of 14 genomes into four groups based on DNA homology, using a cutoff of more than 90% of nucleotide identity and a coverage of more than 80% to allow a highly diverse phage library build-up. These groups are represented by phages FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota and FC44-Bosa. This allowed us to design four primer pairs specific to each group, in order to confirm the affiliation of the other 10 phages as sequenced to their proper group. Furthermore, with these four sets of primers we also tested all remaining plaques isolated in this study (56 in total). This strategy aimed to rapidly eliminate phages that are already sequenced and identify new phages to sequence.
Our PCR screening yielded the following results (Table 3). Among the 24 phages isolated from insect extracts, 23 were FC03-Usme-like phages, while one belonged to the FC44-Bosa group. Among the 12 phages isolated using the sewage water samples, we obtained without enrichment four FC03-Usme-like phages, four FC44-Bosa-like phages, and two FC12-Bacata-like phages. Interestingly, among these 12 newly isolated phages, FC41-Suba and FC42 were not amplified by any of the specific primer pairs designed for the four initial groups, suggesting new genome sequences; FC41-Suba DNA was further extracted and sequenced. Similar sequence analysis led us to conclude that FC41-Suba represented a new group of phages. All six re-isolated phages obtained from the sewage water extracts after enrichment on Xff were identified as FC12-Bacata-like phages. However, two amplification profiles also revealed a positive amplification with FC44-Bosa primers, suggesting that both phages were present on the re-isolated plaques, probably by cross-contamination. Interestingly, these results suggest that both FC12-Bacata-like and FC44-Bosa-like phages were able to multiply on Xylella strains during the enrichment step. Among the six phages isolated on sewage water samples enriched on Xfm, we identified by PCR screening three FC23-Cota-like, one FC03-Usme-like and one FC44-Bosa-like phages. Interestingly, more diversity was obtained on sewage water samples enriched on Xfm, and none of the primer pairs designed did amplify on phage FC24-Teja. Unfortunately, and despite extensive efforts, DNA from this phage was impossible to extract, suggesting that its genome is composed either of highly modified DNA that cannot be extracted in the same way as the other phage DNAs, or is composed of another type of nucleic acid molecule. Of note, we have not yet tried to extract RNA from this phage preparation. We were thus not able to obtain the sequence of this particular phage genome. Finally, among the eight phages isolated from runoff water samples without enrichment, we found four FC03-Usme-like phages and four phage isolates whose DNA could not be amplified with any primer pair, indicating either a different type of nucleic acid, or that they constitute one to four new groups of phages that were designated FC32-Sibate_a, FC32-Sibate_b, FC34-Cajica_a and FC34-Cajica_b (a and b indicate two different plaque morphologies on Xa overlays).
At this stage, our PCR screening method enabled us to isolate at least five different PCR groups of dsDNA bacteriophages represented by phages FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa. Three other bacteriophage isolates, represented by FC24-Teja, FC32-Sibate and FC34-Cajica, were potential new phages; their sequences remain to be obtained to determine their nature.

3.2. Genomic Diversity of the Phages Isolated

According to our method, 10/14 sequenced phages and 32/56 phages screened by PCR belong to the FC03-Usme-like phage group, the most abundant group isolated in this study. By comparing the complete DNA sequences (BLASTn analysis), we observed that the FC03-Usme genome shares 100% identity with 99% coverage with the FC08-Olaya, FC15-Bolivar, FC17-Usaquen, FC25-Alcala, FC47-Fontebon and FC57-Sumapaz genomes, indicating that these phages were different isolates of the same phage species using the species demarcation criteria defined by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). The FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio and FC39-Tenjo genomes were similar to FC03-Usme, with 91–92% identity and a coverage of 89%. FC23-Cota, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa were phage singletons, and their DNA sequence could not be associated at the DNA level with any other phage DNA sequenced in this study.
In order to obtain more information on the diversity of the 14 phage genomes sequenced thus far, we performed a comparative study based on the analysis of shared oligonucleotides signatures (k-mers) using the KI-S tool [39]. Complete DNA sequences were compared, and the percentage of shared 22-mers was determined, allowing us to group the phage genomes into connected component clusters using shared k-mer thresholds of 99%, 80% and 50% (Figure 2 and Table S2). The evaluation of the phage variant synonymy, using the discriminatory selection of the 22-mers, suggested that the 10 FC03-Usme-like phages in fact clustered into two different groups. Interestingly, all the phages extracted and purified from the insect extracts shared 99% of their 22-mers, suggesting the prevalence of a single phage species represented by FC03-Usme. BLASTn genome alignments revealed that FC03-Usme, FC30-Tabio, FC28-Sopo and FC39-Tenjo share more than 91.7% sequence identity over 88% coverage, suggesting at least their inclusion in the same genus in a taxonomic sense (this topic will be discussed later). Using shared k-mers, we gained additional information on their nucleotide sequence relationships within this group: FC03-Usme only shares 25% of 22-mers long k-mers with FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio and FC39-Tenjo, whereas it shares closer similarities with FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio and FC39-Tenjo. These results suggest that subdivisions exist within the Usme-like phages. Interestingly, FC28-Sopo and FC30-Tabio shared 95% of k-mers, while FC28-Sopo and FC30-Tabio only shared 75% of k-mers with FC39-Tenjo, separating these three phages into two subgroups represented by FC28-Sopo and FC30-Tabio on one hand, and FC39-Tenjo on the other. This suggests that we can discriminate three variants of the FC03-Usme-like phages using shared k-mers. Finally, FC23-Cota, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa did not group with each other, nor with any other phages (Figure 2).

3.3. Genomic Characterization

To compare our isolated phage genomes with the diversity available in the Genebank database, we performed a nucleotide BLASTn megablast search, optimized to retrieve highly similar sequences using the complete genomic sequences of phages FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio, FC39-Tenjo, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa. FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata and FC44-Bosa shared homology with sequences available in the Genbank database. FC03-Usme displayed high identity with the genome of phage CP2 of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri [47] (92% identity over 83% coverage), as did FC44-Bosa with phage DLP4 of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [48] (97.4% identity over 99% coverage), and FC12-Bacata with the Xff-infecting phage Salvo [28] (96.3% identity over 89% coverage). Two groups represented by phages FC23-Cota and FC41-Suba did not get a hit in any of the phage sequences in the Genbank database, indicating they were indeed totally new.
The general characteristics of the 14 sequenced phage genomes are summarized in Table 4. The genomic organization and the main functions encoded were common to each of the PCR groups defined earlier and are described in Figure S1. FC03-Usme, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio and FC39-Tenjo encoded 58 predicted CDS, with a genome size close to 43 kb and a GC content around 67%. This group shared homology with the CP2 phage genome but to different extents (Figure S2). FC03-Usme shared 92% identity over 83% of the sequence length with the CP2 phage genomic sequence. At the DNA level, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio, and FC39-Tenjo phage genomes showed more than 8% DNA sequence divergence compared to FC03-Usme, but less than 6% compared to the CP2 genome sequence (Figure S2). Interestingly, phages in this group were isolated from different environmental samples collected in different geographical areas such as Florida and Argentina [49], whereas the original CP2 isolate originated from Yokohama, Japan [47]. Moreover, at the DNA level, these phage genomes grouped together and displayed high identity levels, around 93–95% over 83% coverage, confirming the k-mer analysis. Finally, FC12-Bacata displayed a genome size of 56 kb with 73 predicted CDS, and is homologous to phage Salvo, with 96% identity and 89% coverage. FC12-Bacata phage is an interesting candidate due to its genomic proximity with a phage that was characterized as active on Xff [12].
Surprisingly, the FC44-Bosa phage genome displayed a high identity with the phage DLP4 genome isolated from a soil sample and active on an unrelated species, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [14]. With a genome size of 63 kb and 81 predicted CDS by RAST [38], FC44-Bosa possessed the largest genome of the phages isolated during this study. FC44-Bosa phage was isolated from sewage extracts without any enrichment step, but it seems that FC44-Bosa-like phages are also present in sewage extracts enriched on Xff and on insect extract enriched on Xa, according to PCR screening (Table 3). A putative integrase gene (CAA2409933.1) has been predicted in FC44-Bosa. A similar gene in the DLP4 genome was confirmed to be involved in the lysogenic infection of S. maltophilia D1585 [48]. FC23-Cota phage is the only isolate found in sewage water samples enriched on Xfm. Its genome sequence is 42 kb long, and 52 CDS were predicted. This phage genome displayed a low GC content of around 58%, and shared homology was restricted to only 2% of the genome sequence with the X. citri phage Xc10 genome [15]. This 2% shared DNA region corresponded to region coding for a DNA polymerase A (ASZ72017.1) and a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (ASZ72029.1). Finally, the FC41-Suba genome was 45 kb long and 71 CDS were predicted, with the lowest GC content of 52%. As for FC23-Cota, the FC41-Suba genome sequence did not show any homology at the DNA level within the current Genebank database, sharing only a partial sequence of 253 nucleotides with the A. xylosoxidans phage phiAxp-1 that corresponds to a region encoding for the Terminase large subunit (YP_009220341.1). The FC23-Cota and FC41-Suba phages were thus totally new and uncharacterized phages.

3.4. Morphological Characterization

To go further with the characterization of all these newly isolated phages, we performed a morphological characterization using Transmission Electronic Microscopy (TEM) after negative staining of the purified particles of FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota, FC24, FC34-Cajica, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio FC39-Tenjo, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa. Electron micrographs revealed three morphotypes. FC03-Usme, FC23-Cota, FC24, F32-Sibate, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio and FC39-Tenjo phages showed a typical podophage morphology, whereas FC12-Bacata, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa displayed a siphophage morphology (Figure 3). Of note, FC44-Bosa did not display the classical icosahedric capsid morphology, but rather, an elongated one.
Using ImageJ software for image metrics, we determined that CP2-like phages, represented by the podophages FC03-Usme, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio and FC39-Tenjo, displayed an isometric capsid of 61.7 nm, 65.4 nm, 63.6 nm and 60.6 nm, respectively. FC23-Cota, FC24 and FC34-Cajica also exhibit a podophage morphology, with an isometric capsid measuring 64.1 nm, 65.3 nm and 64.4 nm, respectively. Tails and tail fibers were observed on the micrographs, but given their small sizes, the resolution was not sufficient to measure them (Table 5).
In contrast, FC12-Bacata, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa showed a siphophage morphology, with two different capsid organizations. FC12-Bacata was composed of an isometric head, the diameter of which was 66.5 nm, and a long and flexible tail of 220.5 nm long. FC41-Suba also had a long and flexible tail of 199.5 nm long, with an isometric capsid of 61.2 nm. In contrast, FC44-Bosa was composed of a heterometric head of 60.1 × 88.8 nm long and a long flexible tail of 140.5 nm. All three siphophages in this study displayed fibers observable at the distal extremity of the tails.

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Sequenced Phage Genomes

Among our PCR groups, we distinguished various degrees of homology with known phage DNA sequences. Phages FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata and FC44-Bosa could thus be related to phage genomes present in the NCBI database. In contrast, FC23-Cota and FC41-Suba genomes had no substantial sequence similarity throughout the NCBI database (accessed on January 2021).
To analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the phages isolated in this study with other phages with lytic activity on Xanthomonas spp., Stenotrophomonas spp., and X. fastidiosa, a phylogenetic tree was generated using the VICTOR online tool [40] using complete genomic sequences of the Caudovirales bacteriophages infecting Xanthomonadales (Figure 4).
The inferred phylogeny suggested that phages active on the genera Xanthomonas and Stenotrophomonas were closely related. The OPTSIL clustering yielded 38 species clusters, with 18 at the genus level (Figure 4). In this phylogeny, FC03-Usme, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio and FC39-Tenjo were grouped with phage CP2, and phage FC12-Bacata clustered with Xff phages Sano and Salvo. Phage FC23-Cota grouped with the Xff phages Prado and Paz [12], and surprisingly, also with X. arboricola pv. juglandis phages XAJ24, f20-Xaj and f30-Xaj and X. citri phage Xc10, a vicinity never described so far. Intriguingly, FC41-Suba remotely clustered with a group containing Stenotrophonas phages DLP1 and DLP2, as well as with X. arboricola pv. juglandis phage XAJ2. Finally, the isolated phage FC44-Bosa clustered with Stenotrophonas phage DLP4 and X. oryzae pv. oryzae Xoo-sp2. Interestingly, this phylogeny, based on complete genomic sequences, was congruent overall with a phylogeny based on the concatenated alignment of the conserved major capsid protein and the terminase large subunit protein, determined from the same phage genomes (Figure S3 and Table S3).
According to the genomic and phylogenic analysis, we propose the following taxonomic description of the viruses isolated in this study according to the latest recommendations [52]. All of them belong to the following lineage: Viruses, Duplodnaviria (realm), Heunggongvirae (kingdom), Uroviricota (phylum), Caudoviricetes (class), Caudovirales (order). Family, sub-family and genus affiliations for the newly isolated viruses are discussed below.
i:Xylella phage Cota (Autographiviridae family). According to the latest ICTV viral taxonomy criteria (2019 release), the Xylella phage Cota belongs to the Autographiviridae family. Within this subfamily, the average genome size is 41 kb (42.3 kb for Cota), and the overall genomic organization is conserved with genes on the same strand (predicted ORFs are all situated on the same strand for Cota, Figure S1). Autographiviridae virions display a small (ca. 60 nm in diameter) icosahedral head attached to a short tail (podovirus morphology) as is the case for Cota (Figure 3c). Finally, Autographiviridae encode their own RNA polymerase, which is the case for Cota (Genbank protein ID CAB1282939.1). A genome-wide phylogenetic analysis based on protein-clustering indicates that Xylella phage Cota is related to the Pradovirus genus (Figure 4) but classified by OPTSIL as an “Unclassified Autographiviridae”. A BLASTn analysis revealed that the two Pradoviruses Xylella phage Prado (type species of the Pradovirus genus) and Xylella phage Paz are almost as distantly related from the DNA point of view (73.08% identity, 27% cover) than Xylella phage Prado and Xylella phage Cota (68.15% identity and 35% cover). Taking also into account the low pseudo-bootstrap support values, we chose to classify Xylella phage Cota within the Pradovirus genus (Autographiviridae family) and not in a separated new genus as suggested by the phylogenetic tree in Figure 4.
ii:Usmevirus genus (Podoviridae family). In Figure 4, the genome-wide phylogenetic analysis, based on protein clustering, indicates that Xylella phage Usme, Xanthomonas phage Sopo, Xanthomonas phage Tabio, Xanthomonas phage Tenjo (all 4 phages were isolated during this study) and the Xanthomonas citri phage CP2 form a new genus within the phages infecting Xanthomonads. Xylella phage Usme, Xanthomonas phage Sopo, Xanthomonas phage Tabio, and Xanthomonas phage Tenjo clearly belong to the same species according to the BLASTn analysis (>98.8% identity, >94% cover in pairwise alignments). Xanthomonas citri phage CP2 is slightly more distant from the above-cited viruses (identity between 92 to 95%, cover around 83%). Altogether, these results prompt us to classify these five phages within a new genus named “Usmevirus” in the Podoviridae family. The Xylella phage Usme is defined as the type species of this new genus. A proposal will be submitted to the ICTV for the creation of the Usmevirus genus. Six other Xanthomonas phages were isolated during this study, whose DNA sequences are highly identical to Xylella phage Usme according to our k-mer analysis (Figure 2). Thus, the Xanthomonas phages FC08-Olaya, FC15-Bolivar, FC17-Usaquen, FC25-Alcala, FC47-Fontebon and FC57-Sumapaz all belong to the new Usmevirus genus.
iii:Subavirus genus (Siphoviridae family). In Figure 4, Xanthomonas phage FC41-Suba is too distantly related to the Stenotrophomonas phages DLP_1 and DLP_2 to be classified in the same Septimatrevirus genus (Siphoviridae family). We chose to define a new genus named “Subavirus” (Siphoviridae family) comprising only one Xanthomonas phage Suba as a type species for this new genus. A proposal will be submitted to the ICTV for the creation of the Subavirus genus.
iv:Xylella phage FC12-Bacata. According to the phylogenetic tree presented in Figure 4, the Xylella phage Bacata belongs to the Sanovirus genus (Siphoviridae family).

3.6. Host Range Determination

To determine the host range of the newly isolated phages on different Xf strains, we performed a spot assay using three different bacterial strains representing the subspecies fastidiosa (Xff), pauca (Xfp) and multiplex (Xfm). This assay was performed for the sequenced phages FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa. We also included FC24-Teja, isolated from sewage samples enriched on Xfm cultures, as well as FC32-Sibate and FC34-Cajica, isolated on Xa from runoff waters and without any enrichment on Xf. These later phages were selected as potential Xf phages, although they were not sequenced (Figure 5).
Xff grew faster than Xfp and Xfm. Thus, for this assay, the Xff suspension was adjusted to an OD600 of 0.01, whereas Xfp and Xfm suspensions were adjusted at an OD600 of 0.1. Xff presents a mucoid phenotype and at the late stages of growth, some crystal-like structures were observed at the surface of the drops. The application of the phage buffer seemed to favor crystal formation at the surface of the drops in all strains. However, clear lysis zones appeared on the Xff drops treated with FC03-Usme and FC12-Bacata. A less obvious effect was observed on the Xff drop treated with the phage FC23-Cota. In contrast, no lysis zone was observed upon interaction with all other tested phages of that strain. In the Xfp strain, the mucoid phenotype was less obvious, but the accumulation of crystals on the drop surface was more significant than with the Xff strain. With this strain, we observed a lysis area at the margins of the drops treated with FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata and FC23-Cota phages, whereas no lytic phenotype could be detected with the other phages. On Xfm strain, the drop phenotype was similar to that observed with Xfp. Xfm was altogether the most sensitive strain to phages, and FC03-Usme and FC12-Bacata were very efficient on this strain. Of note, the application of phages FC03-Usme and FC12-Bacata prevented the formation of crystals on the drop surface. On the Xfm strain treated with FC23-Cota, FC24-Teja, FC32-Sibate, FC34-Cajica and FC41-Suba, a small degree of growth inhibition was observed at the interaction points where phages were dropped. Remarkably, even if no lytic zone was observed on Xfm in the presence of FC44-Bosa, we observed that this phage affected the phenotype of crystal formation on the drop surface, and the drop also became mucoid. Given the high phage concentration applied, we cannot totally exclude a “lysis from without” phenomenon [53]. However, since similar doses of highly related phages with similar lysis potential from outside were applied with no effect, the observed lysis was likely due to productive phage growth.
We thus found that FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata and FC23-Cota had lytic activity on the three tested X. fastidiosa strains. Moreover, the phages FC24-Teja, FC32-Sibate, FC34-Cajica and FC41-Suba may also have some activity on the Xfm strain. The isolated phages presented homology with other bacteriophages infecting bacterial strains belonging to the Xanthomonaceae family. Based on the recent phylogeny of the genus Xanthomonas genus [54], we selected five other bacterial strains representing different clades, including X. arboricola pv. juglandis (Xaj) for “Clade A”, X. citri pv. citri (Xc.ci) for “Clade B”, X. vesicatoria (Xv) for “Clade C” and X. campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) for “Clade D” all in the second group of the phylogeny. Another bacterial strain belonging to group one of this tree, X. translucens pv. cerealis (Xtc), was included. As a positive control we used X. albilineans (Xa). As for X. fastidiosa strains, we looked for the lytic ability of isolated bacteriophages using a drop test assay. Only the Xaj strain proved sensitive to phage FC12-Bacata (Table 6), in which we did not see very clear lytic activity, but FC12-Bacata seems to slow down Xaj growth.

4. Discussion

The present work describes the isolation and preliminary characterization of several bacteriophages propagated on X. albilineans, including three of them able to infect X. fastidiosa subspecies fastidiosa, multiplex and pauca. We focused on these three subspecies, as they were all detected in the Mediterranean area and are thus considered emerging plant pathogens and are included in the European quarantine list. To our knowledge, phages infecting Xf were only identified by two different research groups worldwide. The first report mentioning phage particles associated with Xf culture was published in 2008 [55]. This study was most likely observing the spontaneous induction of different Xf Temecula prophages from cells grown in PW broth, and none of these phage genomes has been isolated or sequenced so far. The same group also documented and analyzed several prophages and their importance in Xf strain differentiation [56]. On the other hand, C. Gonzalez’s group isolated and described the first four virulent phages able to infect Xff Temecula [28]. In this study, two siphophages, Sano and Salvo, and two podophages, Prado and Paz, were described and their genomic structure analyzed. Importantly, all these phages not only infect several Xf strains (including seven Xff isolates, two Xf sandyi and one Xf multiplex), but also the Xanthomonas sp. rice isolate (ATCC PTA-13101) that was used as a surrogate host. Prado is the only phage able to infect all 10 Xf strains and 6 Xanthomonas tested, and thus exhibits a fairly large host range in the Xanthomonaceae.
In the present study, we decided to focus on Xf isolates that are present in the Mediterranean area, such as Xfp CFBP 8402 and Xfm CFBP 8418, isolated in the Lecce region in Italy and on the island of Corsica, France, respectively. These two strains are even more fastidious to grow than the type strain Xff CFBP 7970, and despite extensive efforts we did not manage to grow them in a soft-agar overlay. For this reason, we decided to use the surrogate host X. albilineans for plaquing and production, after enrichment or not on Xfm and Xff (Figure 1). A striking observation is that phages isolated directly on Xa with or without enrichment on Xa (FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio, FC39-Tenjo, FC41-Suba, FC44-Bosa) were not able to infect Xff and Xfp strains but could infect Xfm with a low activity. In contrast, the three phages isolated upon enrichment on Xfm or Xff were able to infect efficiently all three Xf strains included in our spot assay (Figure 5, Table 6). This highlights the absolute requirement of the enrichment step in order to isolate phages active against Xf.
Regarding the isolation sources and strategy, we could not isolate any phage from plant samples displaying the typical symptoms of Xf-infected plants and collected in an infected area of Corsica. Of note, virulent phages able to infect Xff were isolated from plant extracts (rice and weeds) that contained Xanthomonas spp. but not Xf [28]. Different hypotheses could explain this result: (i) the processing of the plant samples (see Section 2.2) could have been detrimental to phage isolation, (ii) the symptoms observed on the collected plant samples were not due to Xf infection, or (iii) the symptoms were indeed due to the presence of Xf, but specific phages did not develop in these plants. In contrast, insect vector samples harvested on the island of Corsica, close to the plant samples, were processed in a very similar way to the plant extracts and proved to be an actual phage reservoir for phage FC03-Usme and relatives belonging to the CP2-like group (Table 4). Although different phage isolates were obtained from this type of biological sample, they all proved to belong to the same group. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a virulent phage, active against Xf, isolated from such a source. Interestingly, the xylem-feeding leafhopper vector, called the glassy-winged sharpshooter (GWSS, Homalodisca genus, Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), which is the main insect vector identified for Pierce’s disease transmission [57], has the ability to uptake phages. In this experiment, the insect vector was allowed to feed on beam stems immersed in a phage Paz solution, and showed efficient acquisition of that phage up to 108 PFU gm−1 of GWSS tissue [58]. In the same work, however, the authors mentioned that although phage Paz was efficiently acquired by GWSS, its transmission to plants (bean stems) through the same insect vector was much less efficient, probably due to a dilution effect. It is thus remarkable that several phages were successfully isolated from insect extracts collected in the Xf-infected area. The environmental source that provided the largest diversity in terms of phage isolates was the sewage water sample collected in the Marseille wastewater plant. This is not surprising, as worldwide phage researchers successfully isolate bacteriophages from sewage samples, targeting an immense variety of human, plant, or animal pathogens [59]. The particularity of the water treatment plant we had access to is that it collects water not only from Marseille, the largest city in the region, but also from many other cities and villages around the area with strong agricultural activity. This may explain the significant diversity of phages that could be isolated from this source.
The genomic analysis of the newly isolated phages led to interesting observations. First of all, we isolated and sequenced four different phages that all share a high genomic identity with X. axonopodis phage CP2, among which only FC03-Usme was able to infect Xf strains. This suggest that the CP2-like phages, whose first isolate came from Yokohama (Japan), are very abundant and are distributed all over the world, probably with the Xanthomonaceae strains they infect. A similar conclusion applies to the phage FC12-Bacata, whose genome sequence is homologous to that of the phage Salvo isolated in Texas (USA). Then come phage genomes with very low identity to any genome present in the databases, such as FC23-Cota and FC41-Suba, which can be considered new phage species since their genomes only match a few conserved genes in the X. citri phage Xc10 and A. xylosoxidans phage phiAxp-1 genomes, respectively. Finally, the procedure we set up in this study led mostly to the isolation of strictly virulent phages, as no specific signature of lysogenic development could be identified in their genomes, such as integrase or repressor genes; the BLAST search did not reveal any homology with Xanthomonaceae strains genomes so effectively, as temperate phage genomes would do. The only temperate phage isolated was named FC44-Bosa, whose genome shared extensive identity with the Stenotrophomonas phage DLP4 (Table 4). Interestingly, this phage showed good lytic activity on Xfm.

5. Conclusions

This study allowed the isolation of several phages that constitute promising candidates for the biocontrol of Xylella species in planta. However, in order to reach this goal, additional experimental work is needed. In particular, this project will require the setting up of plant assays to assess phage dissemination, as well as efficient Xf eradication in planta. The application strategy also needs to be carefully designed, since Xf is restricted to plant xylem and application modes designed for other plant pathogens might be ineffective. Current application strategies encompass seed treatment, post-harvest spraying, soil-based or watering system delivery, and plant puncturing [60]. The choice of the best delivery system should be thus performed in agreement with the lifestyle of the bacterium and tested experimentally.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v13050725/s1, Figure S1: Genomic organization and main functions encoded by FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa phage genomes, the type phages of the 5 PCR groups defined in this study, Figure S2: Visualization of BLAST-pairwise comparisons of genome sequences of FCO3-Usme-like phages and Xanthomonas ax-onopodis phage CP2, Figure S3: Phylogeny of phages infecting Xanthomonads, Table S1: Genomic information used for whole genome phylogeny in Figure 4, Table S2: Comparison matrix for similarities between genomes of the phages sequenced in this study, Table S3: Genomic information used for MCP and Terminase_lsu phylogeny.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and F.C.-C.; methodology, F.C.-C., M.A., N.G., M.B., S.C. and M.-A.J.; software, M.B., F.C.-C. and N.G.; validation, F.C.-C., M.A., N.G. and M.-A.J.; formal analysis, F.C.-C., M.A., N.G. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C.-C. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, F.C.-C., M.A., N.G., M.B., S.C. and M.-A.J.; supervision, M.A.; project administration, M.A. and M.-A.J.; funding acquisition, M.A. and M.-A.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the ANRT-CIFRE 2016/0923 through a CIFRE fellowship awarded to F.C.-C. Research in M.A.’s lab is funded by CNRS and Aix-Marseille University (UMR7283). Research in M.-A.J.’s lab is funded by INRAE. Bioline-Agrosciences partly covered the lab costs in both laboratories.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in European Nucleotide Archive (project PRJEB35136) and NCBI (see Table 2 for detailed accession numbers).

Acknowledgments

This work has benefited from the expertise of Artemis Kosta and Hugo Le Guenno at the IMM Platform for Microscopy, Yann Denis from the IMM transcriptomic Platform and Quentin Beaurepère from the INRA-IRHS. Strains used in this study have been provided by the CIRM-CFBP: International Center for Microbial Resources—French Collection for Plant-associated Bacteria, IRHS UMR 1345 INRA-ACO-UA, 42 rue Georges Morel, 49070 Beaucouzé Cedex France (https://www6.inrae.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria, accessed on 10 March 2021). We thank all members of our respective research groups for stimulating discussions regarding this work. The authors also wish to thank Jérôme Gouzy (CATI BBRIC) for the genome assembly pipeline and Khalid El Karkouri (LCB) for help in genome submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The project was supported by the Agence National de Recherche Technologique (ANRT) (CIFRE n°2016/0923) which sponsored this collaborative project between the Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne (UMR7283), the Institut de Recherche en Horticulture et Semences (UMR1345) and Bioline-Agrosciences. F. Clavijo was employed by Bioline-Agrosciences within the framework of the CIFRE PhD convention. The other authors in this study declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (EFSA PLH Panel); Jeger, M.; Caffier, D.; Candresse, T.; Chatzivassiliou, E.; Dehnen-Schmutz, K.; Gilioli, G.; Grégoire, J.-C.; Jaques Miret, J.A.; MacLeod, A.; et al. Updated Pest Categorisation of Xylella Fastidiosa. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Alston, J.M.; Fuller, K.B.; Kaplan, J.D.; Tumber, K.P. Assessing the Returns to R&D on Perennial Crops: The Costs and Benefits of Pierce’s Disease Research in the California Winegrape Industry. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2015, 59, 95–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tumber, K.P.; Alston, J.M.; Fuller, K. Pierce’s Disease Costs California $104 Million per Year. Calif. Agric. 2014, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schneider, K.; van der Werf, W.; Cendoya, M.; Mourits, M.; Navas-Cortés, J.A.; Vicent, A.; Lansink, A.O. Impact of Xylella Fastidiosa Subspecies Pauca in European Olives. PNAS 2020, 117, 9250–9259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ali, B.M.; van der Werf, W.; Oude Lansink, A. Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Xylella Fastidiosa Subsp. Pauca in Puglia. Crop Prot. 2021, 142, 105519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simpson, A.J.; Reinach, F.C.; Arruda, P.; Abreu, F.A.; Acencio, M.; Alvarenga, R.; Alves, L.M.; Araya, J.E.; Baia, G.S.; Baptista, C.S.; et al. The Genome Sequence of the Plant Pathogen Xylella Fastidiosa. The Xylella Fastidiosa Consortium of the Organization for Nucleotide Sequencing and Analysis. Nature 2000, 406, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Falahi Charkhabi, N.; Booher, N.J.; Peng, Z.; Wang, L.; Rahimian, H.; Shams-Bakhsh, M.; Liu, Z.; Liu, S.; White, F.F.; Bogdanove, A.J. Complete Genome Sequencing and Targeted Mutagenesis Reveal Virulence Contributions of Tal2 and Tal4b of Xanthomonas Translucens Pv. Undulosa ICMP11055 in Bacterial Leaf Streak of Wheat. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pieretti, I.; Royer, M.; Barbe, V.; Carrere, S.; Koebnik, R.; Cociancich, S.; Couloux, A.; Darrasse, A.; Gouzy, J.; Jacques, M.-A.; et al. The Complete Genome Sequence of Xanthomonas Albilineans Provides New Insights into the Reductive Genome Evolution of the Xylem-Limited Xanthomonadaceae. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gerlin, L.; Cottret, L.; Cesbron, S.; Taghouti, G.; Jacques, M.-A.; Genin, S.; Baroukh, C. Genome-Scale Investigation of the Metabolic Determinants Generating Bacterial Fastidious Growth. mSystems 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pierce, N.B.; Newton, B. The California Vine Disease: A Preliminary Report of Investigations; G.P.O.: Washington, DC, USA, 1892.
  11. Davis, M.J.; Purcell, A.H.; Thomson, S.V. Pierce’s Disease of Grapevines: Isolation of the Causal Bacterium. Science 1978, 199, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wells, J.M.; Raju, B.C.; Hung, H.-Y.; Weisburg, W.G.; Mandelco-Paul, L.; Brenner, D.J. Xylella Fastidiosa Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov: Gram-Negative, Xylem-Limited, Fastidious Plant Bacteria Related to Xanthomonas Spp. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1987, 37, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mansfield, J.; Genin, S.; Magori, S.; Citovsky, V.; Sriariyanum, M.; Ronald, P.; Dow, M.; Verdier, V.; Beer, S.V.; Machado, M.A.; et al. Top 10 Plant Pathogenic Bacteria in Molecular Plant Pathology: Top 10 Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 614–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jacques, M.-A.; Arlat, M.; Boulanger, A.; Boureau, T.; Carrère, S.; Cesbron, S.; Chen, N.W.G.; Cociancich, S.; Darrasse, A.; Denancé, N.; et al. Using Ecology, Physiology, and Genomics to Understand Host Specificity in Xanthomonas. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2016, 54, 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bragard, C.; Dehnen-Schmutz, K.; Serio, F.D.; Gonthier, P.; Jacques, M.-A.; Miret, J.A.J.; Justesen, A.F.; MacLeod, A.; Magnusson, C.S.; Milonas, P.; et al. Effectiveness of in Planta Control Measures for Xylella Fastidiosa. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dupas, E.; Briand, M.; Jacques, M.-A.; Cesbron, S. Novel Tetraplex QPCR Assays for Simultaneous Detection and Identification of Xylella Fastidiosa Subspecies in Plant Tissues. bioRxiv 2019, 699371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Directive européene 2006/7/EC Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 Concerning the Management of Bathing Water Quality and Repealing Directive 76/160/EEC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L64, 37–51.
  18. Andrea Luvisi; Francesca Nicolì; Luigi De Bellis Sustainable Management of Plant Quarantine Pests: The Case of Olive Quick Decline Syndrome. Sustainability 2017, 9, 659. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) Treatment Solutions to Cure Xylella Fastidiosa Diseased Plants. EFSA J. 2016, 14. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Scortichini, M.; Chen, J.; Caroli, M.D.; Dalessandro, G.; Pucci, N.; Modesti, V.; L’aurora, A.; Petriccione, M.; Zampella, L.; Mastrobuoni, F.; et al. A Zinc, Copper and Citric Acid Biocomplex Shows Promise for Control of Xylella Fastidiosa Subsp. Pauca in Olive Trees in Apulia Region (Southern Italy). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2018, 57, 48–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hopkins, D.L. Biological Control of Pierce’s Disease in the Vineyard with Strains of Xylella Fastidiosa Benign to Grapevine. Plant Dis. 2005, 89, 1348–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baccari, C.; Antonova, E.; Lindow, S. Biological Control of Pierce’s Disease of Grape by an Endophytic Bacterium. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Vandamme, E.J.; Mortelmans, K. A Century of Bacteriophage Research and Applications: Impacts on Biotechnology, Health, Ecology and the Economy!: A Century of Bacteriophage Research and Applications. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Manyi-Loh, C.; Mamphweli, S.; Meyer, E.; Okoh, A. Antibiotic Use in Agriculture and Its Consequential Resistance in Environmental Sources: Potential Public Health Implications. Molecules 2018, 23, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Żaczek, M.; Weber-Dąbrowska, B.; Górski, A. Phages in the Global Fruit and Vegetable Industry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 118, 537–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sieiro, C.; Areal-Hermida, L.; Pichardo-Gallardo, Á.; Almuiña-González, R.; de Miguel, T.; Sánchez, S.; Sánchez-Pérez, Á.; Villa, T.G. A Hundred Years of Bacteriophages: Can Phages Replace Antibiotics in Agriculture and Aquaculture? Antibiotics 2020, 9, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buttimer, C.; McAuliffe, O.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C.; O’Mahony, J.; Coffey, A. Bacteriophages and Bacterial Plant Diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Ahern, S.J.; Das, M.; Bhowmick, T.S.; Young, R.; Gonzalez, C.F. Characterization of Novel Virulent Broad-Host-Range Phages of Xylella Fastidiosa and Xanthomonas. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Das, M.; Bhowmick, T.S.; Ahern, S.J.; Young, R.; Gonzalez, C.F. Control of Pierce’s Disease by Phage. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Gonzalez, C.F.; Ahern, S.J.; Das, M.; Young, I.R.F.; Bhowmick, T.S. Methods and Compositions for Treatment and Control of Plant Disease. U.S. Patent No. 10,499,650, 10 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. PM 7/24 (2) Xylella Fastidiosa. EPPO Bull. 2016, 46, 463–500. [CrossRef]
  32. Lopes, S.A.; Torres, S.C.Z. An Effective and Low-Cost Culture Medium for Isolation and Growth of Xylella Fastidiosa from Citrus and Coffee Plants. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 53, 467–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Saux, M.F.-L.; Bonneau, S.; Essakhi, S.; Manceau, C.; Jacques, M.-A. Aggressive Emerging Pathovars of Xanthomonas Arboricola Represent Widespread Epidemic Clones Distinct from Poorly Pathogenic Strains, as Revealed by Multilocus Sequence Typing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 4651–4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. La Situation de Xylella en France et en Europe | Alim’agri. Available online: http://agriculture.gouv.fr/la-situation-de-xylella-en-france-et-en-europe (accessed on 27 February 2018).
  35. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Bolund, L.; Wang, J. State of the Art de Novo Assembly of Human Genomes from Massively Parallel Sequencing Data. Hum. Genom. 2010, 4, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zerbino, D.R.; Birney, E. Velvet: Algorithms for de Novo Short Read Assembly Using de Bruijn Graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations Using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Briand, M.; Bouzid, M.; Hunault, G.; Legeay, M.; Saux, M.F.-L.; Barret, M. A Rapid and Simple Method for Assessing and Representing Genome Sequences Relatedness. bioRxiv 2019, 569640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M. VICTOR: Genome-Based Phylogeny and Classification of Prokaryotic Viruses. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3396–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Göker, M.; García-Blázquez, G.; Voglmayr, H.; Tellería, M.T.; Martín, M.P. Molecular Taxonomy of Phytopathogenic Fungi: A Case Study in Peronospora. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Adriaenssens, E.; Brister, J.R. How to Name and Classify Your Phage: An Informal Guide. Viruses 2017, 9, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. El Haddad, L.; Ben Abdallah, N.; Plante, P.-L.; Dumaresq, J.; Katsarava, R.; Labrie, S.; Corbeil, J.; St-Gelais, D.; Moineau, S. Improving the Safety of Staphylococcus Aureus Polyvalent Phages by Their Production on a Staphylococcus Xylosus Strain. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. González-Menéndez, E.; Arroyo-López, F.N.; Martínez, B.; García, P.; Garrido-Fernández, A.; Rodríguez, A. Optimizing Propagation of Staphylococcus Aureus Infecting Bacteriophage VB_SauM-PhiIPLA-RODI on Staphylococcus Xylosus Using Response Surface Methodology. Viruses 2018, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. David, H.L.; Clavel, S.; Clement, F. Adsorption and Growth of the Bacteriophage D29 in Selected Mycobacteria. Ann. L’institut Pasteur Virol. 1980, 131, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Santos, S.B.; Fernandes, E.; Carvalho, C.M.; Sillankorva, S.; Krylov, V.N.; Pleteneva, E.A.; Shaburova, O.V.; Nicolau, A.; Ferreira, E.C.; Azeredo, J. Selection and Characterization of a Multivalent Salmonella Phage and Its Production in a Nonpathogenic Escherichia Coli Strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7338–7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Ahmad, A.A.; Ogawa, M.; Kawasaki, T.; Fujie, M.; Yamada, T. Characterization of Bacteriophages Cp1 and Cp2, the Strain-Typing Agents for Xanthomonas Axonopodis Pv. Citri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Peters, D.; McCutcheon, J.; Stothard, P.; Dennis, J. Novel Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia Temperate Phage DLP4 Is Capable of Lysogenic Conversion. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Balogh, B. Characterization and Use of Bacteriophages Associated with Citrus Bacterial Pathogens for Disease Control. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ackermann, H.W. Frequency of Morphological Phage Descriptions in the Year 2000. Brief Review. Arch. Virol. 2001, 146, 843–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Farris, J.S. Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance Matrices. Am. Nat. 1972, 106, 645–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Turner, D.; Kropinski, A.M.; Adriaenssens, E.M. A Roadmap for Genome-Based Phage Taxonomy. Viruses 2021, 13, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abedon, S.T. Lysis from Without. Bacteriophage 2011, 1, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Merda, D.; Bonneau, S.; Guimbaud, J.-F.; Durand, K.; Brin, C.; Boureau, T.; Lemaire, C.; Jacques, M.-A.; Fischer-Le Saux, M. Recombination-Prone Bacterial Strains Form a Reservoir from Which Epidemic Clones Emerge in Agroecosystems. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2016, 8, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, J.; Civerolo, E.L. Morphological Evidence for Phages in Xylella Fastidiosa. Virol. J. 2008, 5, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. de Mello Varani, A.; Souza, R.C.; Nakaya, H.I.; de Lima, W.C.; Paula de Almeida, L.G.; Kitajima, E.W.; Chen, J.; Civerolo, E.; Vasconcelos, A.T.R.; Van Sluys, M.-A. Origins of the Xylella Fastidiosa Prophage-like Regions and Their Impact in Genome Differentiation. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Almeida, R.P.P.; Purcell, A.H. Transmission of Xylella Fastidiosa to Grapevines by Homalodisca Coagulata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2003, 96, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bhowmick, T.S.; Das, M.; Heinz, K.M.; Krauter, P.C.; Gonzalez, C.F. Transmission of Phage by Glassy-Winged Sharpshooters, a Vector of Xylella Fastidiosa. Bacteriophage 2016, 6, e1218411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Chanishvili, N. Phage Therapy--History from Twort and d’Herelle through Soviet Experience to Current Approaches. Adv. Virus Res. 2012, 83, 3–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Holtappels, D.; Fortuna, K.; Lavigne, R.; Wagemans, J. The Future of Phage Biocontrol in Integrated Plant Protection for Sustainable Crop Production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 13 00725 g001 550
Figure 1. Workflow for phage isolation. This pipeline represents the principal steps and methods used to isolate bacteriophages active on X. fastidiosa (Xf), using X. albilineans (Xa) as a surrogate host to propagate phages. The workflow begins by enriching extracts of plants, insects, sewage waters, and runoff waters on Xf subspecies fastidiosa (Xff) and Scheme 56. were re-isolated at least three times to obtain uniform lysis plaques, and 14 plaques were treated to obtain individual phages for sequencing. Phage DNA was extracted and sequenced using our in-house Illumina platform. The DNA sequences were processed, and specific primers targeting the sequenced phages were designed. These primers were used to directly PCR-amplify the DNA present in the 56 purified plaques. Sequenced phages and new candidates from the PCR screening were considered for further phage characterization.
Figure 1. Workflow for phage isolation. This pipeline represents the principal steps and methods used to isolate bacteriophages active on X. fastidiosa (Xf), using X. albilineans (Xa) as a surrogate host to propagate phages. The workflow begins by enriching extracts of plants, insects, sewage waters, and runoff waters on Xf subspecies fastidiosa (Xff) and Scheme 56. were re-isolated at least three times to obtain uniform lysis plaques, and 14 plaques were treated to obtain individual phages for sequencing. Phage DNA was extracted and sequenced using our in-house Illumina platform. The DNA sequences were processed, and specific primers targeting the sequenced phages were designed. These primers were used to directly PCR-amplify the DNA present in the 56 purified plaques. Sequenced phages and new candidates from the PCR screening were considered for further phage characterization.
Viruses 13 00725 g001
Viruses 13 00725 g002 550
Figure 2. Circle packing visualization of shared k-mer analysis. Pairwise similarities between whole phage genomes sequenced in this study clustered according to their shared 22-mers. Circles representing each phage genome were colored according to the isolation conditions of each phage. Inner and outer circles are based on shared k-mer thresholds of 99% (light purple), 80% (medium purple) and 50% (dark purple), respectively. The FC03 group contains the isolated phages FC03-Usme, FC08-Olaya, FC15-Bolivar, FC17-Usaquen, FC25-Alcala, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio, FC47-Fontebon and FC57-Sumapaz and forms two different subgroups. FC23-Cota, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa are neither associated with any of the previous groups, nor with each other. The matrix of shared k-mers is presented in Table S2.
Figure 2. Circle packing visualization of shared k-mer analysis. Pairwise similarities between whole phage genomes sequenced in this study clustered according to their shared 22-mers. Circles representing each phage genome were colored according to the isolation conditions of each phage. Inner and outer circles are based on shared k-mer thresholds of 99% (light purple), 80% (medium purple) and 50% (dark purple), respectively. The FC03 group contains the isolated phages FC03-Usme, FC08-Olaya, FC15-Bolivar, FC17-Usaquen, FC25-Alcala, FC28-Sopo, FC30-Tabio, FC47-Fontebon and FC57-Sumapaz and forms two different subgroups. FC23-Cota, FC41-Suba and FC44-Bosa are neither associated with any of the previous groups, nor with each other. The matrix of shared k-mers is presented in Table S2.
Viruses 13 00725 g002
Viruses 13 00725 g003 550
Figure 3. Electron micrographs of isolated phages. Electron micrographs of isolated phages revealed after negative coloration with uranyl acetate 2%. Morphology indicates that the phages belong to two different morphotypes. FC03-Usme (a), FC23-Cota (c), FC24-Teja (d), FC28-Sopo (e), FC30-Tabio (f), FC34-Cajica (g) and FC39-Tenjo (h) belong to the podovirus morphotype. FC12-Bacata (b), FC41-Suba (i) and FC44-Bosa (j) belong to the siphovirus morphotype. Scale bar = 100 nm.
Figure 3. Electron micrographs of isolated phages. Electron micrographs of isolated phages revealed after negative coloration with uranyl acetate 2%. Morphology indicates that the phages belong to two different morphotypes. FC03-Usme (a), FC23-Cota (c), FC24-Teja (d), FC28-Sopo (e), FC30-Tabio (f), FC34-Cajica (g) and FC39-Tenjo (h) belong to the podovirus morphotype. FC12-Bacata (b), FC41-Suba (i) and FC44-Bosa (j) belong to the siphovirus morphotype. Scale bar = 100 nm.
Viruses 13 00725 g003
Viruses 13 00725 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogeny of phages infecting Xanthomonads. The phylogenic tree in Figure 4 shows the relationships between amino acid sequences for the whole phage genomes obtained in this study and the isolated Caudovirales phages active on various species of the genera Xanthomonas, Xylella and Stenotrophomonas. All pairwise comparisons of the amino acid sequences were conducted using the Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP), and trees were inferred using the formulas D0 and yielding average support of 58% method, under the settings recommended for prokaryotic viruses [40]. The OPTSIL clustering yielded 38 species clusters, with 18 at the genus level. Red font highlights referenced bacteriophages that are active on X. fastidiosa and blue font highlights referenced bacteriophages isolated in this study. The green font indicates the genus of each phage. Trees were rooted at the midpoint [51]. The numbers above the branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values from 100 replications. The branch lengths of the resulting VICTOR trees are scaled in terms of the respective distance formula used.
Figure 4. Phylogeny of phages infecting Xanthomonads. The phylogenic tree in Figure 4 shows the relationships between amino acid sequences for the whole phage genomes obtained in this study and the isolated Caudovirales phages active on various species of the genera Xanthomonas, Xylella and Stenotrophomonas. All pairwise comparisons of the amino acid sequences were conducted using the Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP), and trees were inferred using the formulas D0 and yielding average support of 58% method, under the settings recommended for prokaryotic viruses [40]. The OPTSIL clustering yielded 38 species clusters, with 18 at the genus level. Red font highlights referenced bacteriophages that are active on X. fastidiosa and blue font highlights referenced bacteriophages isolated in this study. The green font indicates the genus of each phage. Trees were rooted at the midpoint [51]. The numbers above the branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values from 100 replications. The branch lengths of the resulting VICTOR trees are scaled in terms of the respective distance formula used.
Viruses 13 00725 g004
Viruses 13 00725 g005 550
Figure 5. Phage sensitivity spot assay on various Xf strains treated with isolated phages. Three X. fastidiosa strains were tested. Top line, X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa (Xff) strain CFBP7970, middle line, X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex (Xfm) strain CFBP 8418, and bottom line, X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca (Xfp) strain CFBP 8402. Aliquots (20 μL) of bacterial suspension were dropped on B-CYE plates and left to dry. Then, 10 μL of FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota, FC24-Tenjo, FC32-Sibate, FC34-Cajica, FC41-Suba, and FC44-Bosa phage suspensions (1010 PFU·mL−1) were spotted on the margins of the culture drops. Two controls were included for each culture line; N stands for no treatment and B stands for 10 μL of phage buffer. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Yellow arrows indicate the inoculation points. Red stars indicate the lytic zones.
Figure 5. Phage sensitivity spot assay on various Xf strains treated with isolated phages. Three X. fastidiosa strains were tested. Top line, X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa (Xff) strain CFBP7970, middle line, X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex (Xfm) strain CFBP 8418, and bottom line, X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca (Xfp) strain CFBP 8402. Aliquots (20 μL) of bacterial suspension were dropped on B-CYE plates and left to dry. Then, 10 μL of FC03-Usme, FC12-Bacata, FC23-Cota, FC24-Tenjo, FC32-Sibate, FC34-Cajica, FC41-Suba, and FC44-Bosa phage suspensions (1010 PFU·mL−1) were spotted on the margins of the culture drops. Two controls were included for each culture line; N stands for no treatment and B stands for 10 μL of phage buffer. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Yellow arrows indicate the inoculation points. Red stars indicate the lytic zones.
Viruses 13 00725 g005
Table
Table 1. Bacterial strains used in this study.
Table 1. Bacterial strains used in this study.
Strain/GenotypeAbbreviationCollection CodeNCBI
Xylella fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosaXffCFBP 7970PRJNA417585
Xylella fastidiosa subsp. paucaXfpCFBP 8402PRJNA383475
Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplexXfmCFBP 8418PRJNA314986
Xanthomonas albilineansXaCFBP 2523PRJNA338244
Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandisXajCFBP 2528PRJNA275685
Xanthomonas citri pv. citriXcciCFBP 3369PRJNA254373
Xanthomonas vesicatoriaXvCFBP 2537PRJNA60019
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestrisXccCFBP 5241PRJNA296
Xanthomonas translucens pv. cerealisXtcCFBP 2541PRJNA268946
Table
Table 2. Phage genomes as sequenced.
Table 2. Phage genomes as sequenced.
Phage NameFull NomenclatureAccession NumberRaw Sequence ID
FC03-Usme
FC08-Olaya		Xylella phage Usme
Xanthomonas phage Olaya		LR743523
MW802488		ERR5548206
SRX10492030
FC12-Bacata
FC15-Bolivar
FC17-Usaquen		Xylella phage Bacata
Xanthomonas phage Bolivar
Xanthomonas phage Usaquen		LR743524
MW822535
MW822536		ERR5548205
SRX10492031
SRX10492032
FC23-Cota
FC25-Alcala		Xylella phage Cota
Xanthomonas phage Alcala		LR778216
MW822537		ERR5548199
SRX10492033
FC28-SopoXanthomonas phage SopoLR743529ERR5548204
FC30-TabioXanthomonas phage TabioLR743528ERR5548203
FC39-TenjoXanthomonas phage TenjoLR743531ERR5548202
FC41-SubaXanthomonas phage SubaLR743530ERR5548201
FC44-Bosa
FC47-Fontebon
FC57-Sumapaz		Xanthomonas phage Bosa
Xanthomonas phage Fontebon
Xanthomonas phage Sumapaz		LR743532
MW822538
MW822539		ERR5548200
SRX10492034
SRX10492035
Table
Table 3. Phages isolated with and without enrichment.
Table 3. Phages isolated with and without enrichment.
PCR Groups a
SourceConditionsIsolated Phages Sequenced Phage Genomes FC03FC44FC12FC23Potential New Phages
Plant extractsEnrichment on XffNA b------
Enrichment on XfmNA------
Enrichment on XaNA------
Insect extractsEnrichment on Xff6LR743523 MW8024886---0
Enrichment on Xfm6MW822538 MW8225396---0
Enrichment on Xa12MW822535 MW822536111--0
Sewage watersampleEnrichment on Xff6LR743524 (x2) c-24-0
Enrichment on Xfm6LR778216 MW82253711-31
Direct plaquing on Xa12LR743531 LR743532442-1 + LR743530 d
Runoff waters sampleEnrichment on XffNA------
Enrichment on XfmNA------
Direct plaquing on Xa8LR743529 LR7435284---4
a PCR groups using specific primers targeting the isolated and sequenced phage genomes. b NA, not applicable. c LR743524 has been sequenced twice. d LR743530 was selected after PCR screening.
Table
Table 4. General features of 14 sequenced phage genomes. In this table, we temporarily assign our newly sequenced phages the taxonomic affiliation of their closest homologs (when available).
Table 4. General features of 14 sequenced phage genomes. In this table, we temporarily assign our newly sequenced phages the taxonomic affiliation of their closest homologs (when available).
PhageSize (bp)%GCCDSBLAST Nearest OrganismCoverage
(%)		Identity
(%)		E-ValueOrderFamilyGenus Specie
FC03-Usme a 4372166.658X. axonopodis phage CP28392.11%0.0CaudoviralesPodovirusUnclassified PodovirusUsmevirus
FC12-Bacata 5623262.973X. fastidiosa phage Salvo8996.29%0.0CaudoviralesSiphovirusSanovirusBacatavirus
FC23-Cota4230758.852 none NANANANANANATejovirus
FC28-Sopo4386166.958X. axonopodis phage CP28293.96%0.0CaudoviralesPodovirusUnclassified PodovirusBacatavirus
FC30-Tabio4345866.958X. axonopodis phage CP28395.39%0.0CaudoviralesPodovirusUnclassified PodovirusBacatavirus
FC39-Tenjo4385067.258X. axonopodis phage CP28394.70%0.0CaudoviralesPodovirusUnclassified PodovirusBacatavirus
FC41-Suba4551052.371 none NANANANANANASubavirus
FC44-Bosa6382864.881Stenotrophomonas phage DLP499%97.40 %0.0CaudoviralesSiphovirusUnclassified SiphovirusBosavirus
a FC08-Olaya, FC15-Bolivar, FC-17 Usaquen, FC25-Alcala, FC47-Fontebon and FC57-Sumapaz genomes have the same characteristics as FC03-Usme.
Table
Table 5. Morphological characteristics of the phages based on MET acquisitions.
Table 5. Morphological characteristics of the phages based on MET acquisitions.
PhageHead Shape & Diameter (nm)Tail Shape & Length (nm)Morphotype a
FC03-Usme
(n = 15)		Isometric, 61.7 ± 2*NAPodovirusC1
FC12-Bacata
(n = 14)		Isometric, 66.5 ± 2Long, Flexible, 220.5 ± 5SiphovirusB1
FC23-Cota
(n = 14)		Isometric, 64.1 ± 1*NAPodovirusC1
FC24-Teja
(n = 15)		Isometric, 65.3 ± 2*NAPodovirusC1
FC28-Sopo
(n = 6)		Isometric, 65.4 ± 2*NAPodovirusC1
FC30-Tabio
(n = 6)		Isometric, 63.6 ± 2*NAPodovirusC1
FC34-Cajica
(n = 15)		Isometric, 64.4 ± 2*NAPodovirusC1
FC39-Tenjo
(n = 6)		Isometric, 60.6 ± 2*NAPodovirusC1
FC41-Suba
(n = 15)		Isometric, 61.2 ± 2Long, Flexible, 199.5 ± 4SiphovirusB1
FC44-Bosa
(n = 12)		Heterometric, 60.1 ± 1
× 88.8 ± 2		Long, Flexible, 140.5 ± 7SiphovirusB3
Phage physical dimensions are the means of measurements of at least n individual virions using ImageJ. *NA, not applicable; a according to [50].
Table
Table 6. Lytic activity of phages on Xylella and Xanthomonas species.
Table 6. Lytic activity of phages on Xylella and Xanthomonas species.
CFBPStrainFC03-UsmeFC12-BacataFC23-CotaFC24-TejaFC32-TabioFC34-TenjoFC41-SubaFC44-Bosa
7970X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa
8402X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca
8418X. fastidiosa subsp. multiplex
2523X. albilineans
2528X. arboricola pv. juglandis
3369X. citri pv. citri
2537X. vesicatoria
5241X. campestris pv. campestris
2541X. translucens pv. cerealis
Black boxes indicate a lytic activity of the selected phages, gray boxes represent a weak lytic activity, and white boxes indicate no lytic activity.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Clavijo-Coppens, F.; Ginet, N.; Cesbron, S.; Briand, M.; Jacques, M.-A.; Ansaldi, M. Novel Virulent Bacteriophages Infecting Mediterranean Isolates of the Plant Pest Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas albilineans. Viruses 2021, 13, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050725

AMA Style

Clavijo-Coppens F, Ginet N, Cesbron S, Briand M, Jacques M-A, Ansaldi M. Novel Virulent Bacteriophages Infecting Mediterranean Isolates of the Plant Pest Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas albilineans. Viruses. 2021; 13(5):725. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Clavijo-Coppens, Fernando, Nicolas Ginet, Sophie Cesbron, Martial Briand, Marie-Agnès Jacques, and Mireille Ansaldi. 2021. "Novel Virulent Bacteriophages Infecting Mediterranean Isolates of the Plant Pest Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas albilineans" Viruses 13, no. 5: 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop