Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Wastewater Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2: One-Year Study in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
T Cells in Tick-Borne Flavivirus Encephalitis: A Review of Current Paradigms in Protection and Disease Pathology
Previous Article in Journal
Increased Polymerase Activity of Zoonotic H7N9 Allows Partial Escape from MxA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Booster Doses of the SARS-CoV-2 Inactivated Vaccine KCONVAC against the Mutant Strains
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell Immunogen Atlas of Zika Virus Reveals E, NS1 and NS4 Proteins as the Vaccine Targets

by
Hangjie Zhang
1,2,†,
Wenling Xiao
2,3,†,
Min Zhao
4,†,
Yingze Zhao
2,
Yongli Zhang
2,
Dan Lu
4,
Shuangshuang Lu
5,
Qingxu Zhang
2,
Weiyu Peng
4,
Liumei Shu
2,
Jie Zhang
2,
Sai Liu
2,
Kexin Zong
2,
Pengyan Wang
2,
Beiwei Ye
2,
Shihua Li
4,
Shuguang Tan
4,
Fuping Zhang
4,
Jianfang Zhou
2,
Peipei Liu
2,
Guizhen Wu
2,
Xuancheng Lu
5,*,
George F. Gao
2,4,* and
William J. Liu
2,*
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310021, China
2
NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC), Beijing 102206, China
3
Shunde Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University (The Lecong Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan 528000, China
4
CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogen Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
5
Laboratory of Animal Center, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2022, 14(11), 2332; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112332
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue T Cell Responses to Viral Infections)

Abstract

:
Zika virus (ZIKV)-specific T cells are activated by different peptides derived from virus structural and nonstructural proteins, and contributed to the viral clearance or protective immunity. Herein, we have depicted the profile of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell immunogenicity of ZIKV proteins in C57BL/6 (H-2b) and BALB/c (H-2d) mice, and found that featured cellular immunity antigens were variant among different murine alleles. In H-2b mice, the proteins E, NS2, NS3 and NS5 are recognized as immunodominant antigens by CD8+ T cells, while NS4 is dominantly recognized by CD4+ T cells. In contrast, in H-2d mice, NS1 and NS4 are the dominant CD8+ T cell antigen and NS4 as the dominant CD4+ T cell antigen, respectively. Among the synthesized 364 overlapping polypeptides spanning the whole proteome of ZIKV, we mapped 91 and 39 polypeptides which can induce ZIKV-specific T cell responses in H-2b and H-2d mice, respectively. Through the identification of CD8+ T cell epitopes, we found that immunodominant regions E294-302 and NS42351-2360 are hotspots epitopes with a distinct immunodominance hierarchy present in H-2b and H-2d mice, respectively. Our data characterized an overall landscape of the immunogenic spectrum of the ZIKV polyprotein, and provide useful insight into the vaccine development.

1. Introduction

As a mosquito-borne virus belonging to the flavivirus genus of the Flaviviridae family, Zika virus (ZIKV) was firstly isolated in 1947 from rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) in the Zika forest, Uganda [1,2]. Although human infection was reported as early as 1964, the first major ZIKV outbreak did not occur until 2007 in Yap Island, where over 70% of the population within the island became infected [3]. Infection with ZIKV in humans is often asymptomatic or mild, consisting of skin rashes, conjunctivitis, fever and headaches [4]. However, the outbreak of Zika virus, emerging since 2016 in French Polynesia and in South America and spreading immediately globally, was linked to Guillain–Barre syndrome in adults as well as an increase in fetal abnormalities, including placental insufficiency, microcephaly, making ZIKV infection a global health crisis by the World Health Organization [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Additionally, ZIKV can be transmitted by sexual, blood-borne and maternal-fetal routes [11,12,13], and male infertility has been reported in mouse and human studies [14,15,16].
Studies from mouse models and exposed humans have demonstrated a strong adoptive virus-specific T cells response in clearance of ZIKV [17,18,19,20]. CD4+ T cells proliferate rapidly and have been shown to have an essential role in protection against primary ZIKV infection through assisting B cells to generate neutralizing antibodies and producing polyfunctional cytokines in a murine model [17,21,22,23]. Concomitantly, CD8+ T cells eliminate ZIKV infection by recognizing conserved viral proteins presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I glycoproteins [24,25], becoming activated and expressing antiviral cytokines, suggesting a protective cytotoxic T-cell response [26,27,28]. Moreover, the depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells or deficiency of T cells in Rag1−/− mice resulted in higher viral loads after infection of ZIKV, but adoptive transfer of CD8+ T cells from ZIKV-infected mice reversed this effect [18,27,28], thus, indicating a pivotal role of T cells in the anti-ZIKV immunity. However, the immunodominant hierarchy of the ZIKV polyprotein is still largely unknown.
The ZIKV genome contains a single open reading frame encoding a polyprotein consisting of 3410 amino acids, which would be post-translationally processed into structural (C, prM/M, and E) and non-structural (NS1, NS2a, NS2b, NS3, NS4a, NS4b, and NS5) proteins by cellular and viral proteases [29]. The antigenic characteristics of the different ZIKV proteins are not well determined. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses to capsid, envelope proteins and non-structural protein 1 (NS1) have been observed in ZIKV-infected monkeys and humans [30,31]. In mice, several CD8+ T-cell epitopes restricted to H-2b have been identified, with a significant portion derived from envelope proteins, including E294-302 [27,28]. Moreover, Wen et al. identified HLA-B*0702 and HLA-A*0101-restricted epitopes in Ifnar1−/− HLA transgenic mice after ZIKV infection [32]. However, the profile of antigenic peptides spanning the whole ZIKV proteome has not been defined.
In this study, we characterized the immunogenic hierarchy of ZIKV based on the peptides synthesized spanning all the structural and nonstructural proteins. The profile of immunodominant antigens and epitopes was mapped among the H-2b and H-2d mice. The CD8+ and CD4+ T cell recognition features of the epitope spectrum were characterized. These findings suggest a clear cell-mediated antigenic profile with epitope hotspots among the whole proteome of ZIKV and have important implications for designing vaccines and evaluating T-cell assays.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Viral Strains and Mice

ZIKV strain ZIKA-SMGC-1 (GenBank accession number: KX266255) [15] was amplified in C6/36 mosquito cells and harvested from cell supernatants 7–10 days after infection. Virus was titrated using baby hamster kidney (BHK)-21 cell-based focus-forming units (FFUs). Specific-pathogen-free wild-type mice C57BL/6 (H-2b) and BALB/c (H-2d) were purchased (Vital River Co., Ltd. Beijing, China), and bred at Laboratory Animal Center, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All of the animals were housed in groups of three to five animals in Eurotype II long clear-transparent plastic cages with autoclaved dust-free sawdust bedding. They were fed a pelleted and extruded mouse diet ad libitum and had unrestricted access to drinking water. The light/dark cycle in the room consisted of 12/12 h with artificial light. All experiments were performed following institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved animal protocols. C57BL/6 and BALB/c female mice between 6 and 8 weeks of age were intraperitoneally inoculated (i.p.) with 104 focus forming units (FFUs) of ZIKV in a 200 μL volume of 10% FBS/PBS buffer.

2.2. Splenocyte Isolation

Isolation of splenocytes was performed as described previously [33]. ZIKV-infected mice were killed 14 days after infection. The spleens were perfused with PBS immediately and disrupted and passed through a 40 µm sieve mechanically. Red blood cells were lysed with RBC lysis solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) before cryopreservation. Splenocytes were isolated and used for ELISPOT assays and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays.

2.3. Peptide Prediction Approaches and Peptide Synthesis

ZIKV polyprotein sequences of Asian lineages (Brazil 2015 strain, GenBank: KU365777) were obtained from the NCBI protein database. Peptides (20-mer) that overlapped by 10 amino acids were designed using online software (www.hiv.lanl.gov, accessed on 12 December 2016) [34]. A total of 364 overlapping polypeptides were designed and synthesized. The 8- to 12-mer epitopes that bound H-2b and H-2d were predicted within the 20-mer peptides using the NetMHC 4.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk, accessed on 4 July 2017), as previously described [35]. For each mouse allele, the lists of peptides obtained above were sorted by predicted affinity and restricted to the top 1~3. Overlapping 20-mer peptides and 8- to 12-mer epitope candidates were synthesized by Scilight Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The purity of the synthesized peptides was 95%, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Peptides were dissolved in DMSO at 20 mg/mL and stored at −20 °C.

2.4. ELISPOT Assays

Positive overlapping peptides of the ZIKV polyprotein were detected by 2-D matrix pool analysis and further verified with individual peptides. The 364 overlapping peptides were coded and mixed in 80 matrix peptide pools (X-axis:1–1 to 4–12, Y-axis:1–A to 4–G) Table S1 (Supplementary Materials) and detected using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) [34,36]; the positive peptides were detected and verified additionally. Briefly, a total of 5 × 105 mouse splenocytes was stimulated with matrix peptide pools (with 2 μM of each peptide) or 10 µM of individual peptide in 96-well flat-bottom plates that were coated with anti-IFN-γ mAb. Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin were used as a positive control, whereas DMSO with the mean concentration in peptide/splenocytes co-incubation well was added into the control well (splenocytes alone). After incubation for 20 h, biotinylated IFN-γ mAb was added, followed by streptavidin-HRP. Then 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole substrate solution was added to the wells and incubated for 5 to 20 min in the dark at room temperature. Finally, IFN-γ spot-forming cells (SFCs) were counted using an ELISPOT reader. Responses are expressed as number of SFCs per 1 × 106 splenocytes and were considered positive if the magnitude of the response was SFCs > 40, the magnitude of the positive well should have 2-folds than the control well.

2.5. Flow Cytometry Analyses

Intracellular cytokine staining assays were conducted as previously described [27,37]. Briefly, splenocytes (2.5 × 106 per sample) were cultured in 10% FBS/RPMI medium supplemented with ZIKV protein peptide pools with 2 μM of each peptide or 10 µM of individual peptide for 4 h at 37 °C in 96-well U-bottom plates. Splenocytes stimulated with PMA-ionomycin were used as a positive control, whereas DMSO with the mean concentration in peptide/splenocytes co-incubation well was added into the control well (splenocytes alone). Brefeldin A (GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences) was then added and incubated with the cells for 2 h before staining. The cells were next incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with PE-conjugated anti-CD3 mAb (Clone 17A2), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb (Clone 53-5.8) and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb (clone GK1.5). Subsequently, the cells were permeabilized in Cytofix/Cytoperm for 20 min at 4 °C, washed three times with Perm/Wash buffer, and incubated in the same buffer for 30 min at 4 °C with FITC-conjugated anti-IFN-γ mAb (clone XMG1.2), APC-conjugated anti-IL-2 mAb (clone JES6-5H4), and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-TNF-α mAb (clone MP6-XT22).

2.6. Tetramer Preparation and Staining

H-2b-restricted tetramers of peptides E294–302, E345–355, NS11237–1245, NS21479–1486, NS31759–1767, NS42140–2147 and NS52839–2848 were prepared as previously described [33]. Briefly, to produce biotinylated peptide-MHC protein, H-2Db-heavy chain with a specific biotinylation site was modified at the C terminus of the α3 domain. The soluble H-2Db/peptide complex was generated through recombinant H-2Db and β2m refolded in the presence of high concentrations of H-2Db-restricted peptide. Then the H-2Db/peptide complexes were purified over a Superdex 200HR column (GE Healthcare) and biotinylated by incubation with D-biotin, ATP, and the biotin protein ligase BirA (Avidity) at 4 °C overnight. The biotinylated H-2Db was further purified over a Superdex 200 10/300 GL gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) to remove excess biotin and then mixed with PE-streptavidin (Sigma-Aldrich). For tetramer and surface marker staining, mouse splenocytes and single-cell suspensions of brain, spinal cord and testicular tissues were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-CD3 mAb (Clone 17A2), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb (Clone 53-5.8), PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb (clone GK1.5), and PE-conjugated tetramer at 4 °C in the dark. Multiparameter analyses were performed on a FACSAria™ II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. For all analyses, p-values were analyzed with Student’s t-test (n.s. p > 0.05; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). All graphs were analyzed with Prism software version 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. The Distinct Immunogenic Hierarchy of Structural and Nonstructural Proteins of ZIKV in H-2b and H-2d Mice

To identify the specific peptides and epitopes of ZIKV in C57BL/6 (H-2b) and BALB/c (H-2d) mice, we designed 364 overlapping peptides from the full-length sequence (3423 amino acids) of ZIKV. Peptides (20-mer) that overlapped by 10 amino acids were synthesized to ensure that shorter peptides (e.g., 8 to 11-mers) were represented in at least one peptide (Figure 1A,B). Next, we tested T-cell responses to the ZIKV protein libraries mixed with peptides from proteins using IFN-γ-ELISPOT assays in H-2b and H-2d mice infected with ZIKV for 14 days (Figure 1C). Robust T-cell reactions can be observed in H-2b mice against E, NS2, NS3, NS4 and NS5 protein libraries, while NS1, NS3, and NS4 protein libraries can induce strong T-cell reactions in H-2d mice (Figure 1D).
To further validate the profile of the immune reaction to these ZIKV-derived protein libraries, intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) was performed. Splenocytes were stimulated with all eight protein libraries and the frequency of IFN-γ/TNF-α/IL-2-producing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells was determined. E, NS2, NS3 and NS5 protein libraries induced a high frequency of IFN-γ-expressing CD8+ T cells, while, E and NS4 induced a high frequency of IFN-γ-CD4+ T cells in H-2b mice (Figure 2A). In H-2d mice, NS1, NS4 protein libraries induced the highest expression of three cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α) in CD8+ T cells, which was similar to the ELISPOT assay results, while NS4 induced the highest IFN-γ-expressing CD4+ T cells (Figure 2A,B). Thus, generally, ZIKV E protein in H-2b mice, and NS1 and NS4 in H-2d mice were the dominant antigens for inducing a high frequency of IFN-γ-expressing CD8+ T cells, while NS4 for both mouse alleles dominate the IFN-γ-expressing CD4+ T cell responses. These results demonstrated distinct dominance features of ZIKV protein libraries to induce virus-specific CD8+/CD4+ T cells among different mouse alleles.

3.2. The Profile Mapping of Antigenic Peptides across the Whole ZIKV Polyprotein in Mice

To verify the map of the T-cell response to ZIKV, all 364 peptides spanning the ZIKV proteome were tested by IFN-γ-ELISPOT assays using matrix peptide pools in ZIKV-infected wild-type mice. The T-cell responses to ZIKV in H-2b and H-2d mice were not identical, with more H-2b-positive epitopes than H-2d-restricted ones. Among the eight ZIKV proteins, 91 peptides were positive for H-2b and 39 for H-2d. For H-2b mice, positive epitopes were derived from C (1/13), prM (3/17), E (25/53), NS1 (14/38), NS2 (8/37), NS3 (8/66), NS4 (12/41) and NS5 (20/99), with immune hotspots in E and NS1 proteins. For H-2d mice, distribution of the positive peptides among the eight proteins were C (2/13), prM (0/17), E (11/53), NS1 (4/38), NS2 (7/37), NS3 (6/66), NS4 (7/41) and NS5 (2/99) (Figure 3A,B). The frequencies of peptide-specific IFN-γ-producing T cells ranged from 40 to 804 SFCs per 106 T cells in H-2b mice and 40 to 1178 SFCs per 106 T cells in H-2d mice. Interestingly, H-2b and H-2d have eleven shared peptides recognized by both mouse alleles.

3.3. The CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell Recognition Features of the ZIKV Antigens

To further validate the immune reaction and cytokines induced by these above-positive peptides, splenocytes were stimulated with a positive peptide individually and the IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 secreting of the antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells was detected. For H-2b mice, 3 peptides presented positive for three cytokines of IFN-γ/TNF-α/IL-2 in CD8+ T cells and 13 peptides in CD4+ T cells (Figure 4). Peptides such as E640-659 and NS52955-2973 in CD8+ T cells performed strongly, producing three cytokines. For H-2d mice, six peptides presented positive for three cytokines in CD8+ T cells and three peptides in CD4+ T cells (Figure S1). Peptides such as NS11054-1071 and NS42349-2367 performed strongly, with three cytokines producing in CD8+ T cells. Other peptides performed immune activation with production of two or individual cytokines. Taken together, these results demonstrate a distinct CD8+ and CD4+ T cell recognition of the epitope spectrum of ZIKV.

3.4. The Immunodominant Hotspots of ZIKV Recognized by CD8+ T Cells in Mice

To further identify the exact short epitopes (8–11 amino acids) recognized by CD8+ T cells within the overlapping 20-mer peptides that tested positive in the screening, we predicted the potential short CD8+ T cell epitopes through the binding motif of H-2 class I molecules (Db, Kb, Dd and Kd). A total of 102 short epitope candidates were predicted, 45 were specific for H-2Db, 33 for H-2Kb, 6 for H-2Dd and 18 for H-2Kd. Through the IFN-γ-ELISPOT using the splenocytes from mice infected with ZIKV, a total of 20 H-2Db, 15 H-2Kb, 2 H-2Dd, 12 H-2Kd and 2 H2-I restricted epitopes were identified (Table 1 and Table 2). For H-2b mice, the positive epitopes distributed among prM (3), E (9), NS1 (1), NS2 (4), NS3 (5), NS4 (7) and NS5 (6) (Figure 5A); for H-2d mice, the positive epitopes distributed among prM (1), E (3), NS1 (2), NS3 (3), NS4 (5) and NS5 (2). Importantly, the distribution of the CD8+ T cell epitopes also showed hotspot characteristics, and the immunodominant regions E294-302 and NS42351-2360 presented distinct immunodominance hierarchy in H-2b and H-2d mice.
To further validate the T-cell activation of ZIKV-derived CD8+ T cell epitopes from each protein in H-2b mice, splenocytes were stimulated with each positive peptide to detect the frequency of IFNγ-producing CD8+ T cells. E294–302, E334–355, NS11237–1245, NS21479–1486, NS31759–1767, NS42140–2147 and NS52839–2848 were the immunodominant epitopes, and induced a high frequency of IFNγ- expressing cells (Figure 5B,C). Furthermore, we synthesized specific tetramers of these immunodominant epitopes, and found that E294–302 and NS21479–1486 tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells were detected in the splenocytes of ZIKV-infected mice (Figure 5D).

4. Discussion

C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice models are widely used for the pathogenesis study of ZIKV infection and vaccine development [27,28,38]. Yu, et al. compared the neurological manifestation for Zika virus infection in C57BL/6, Kunming, and the BALB/c mouse model, and found C57BL/6 owned the highest susceptibility and pathogenicity to the nervous system, while BALB/c associated with similar ocular findings to clinical cases [36]. Additionally, the strain of two mice had a different immune responses preponderance, Th1 immune response and IFN-γ production are dominant for C57BL/6, while Balb/C triggers more of the Th2 immune response and humoral response [37]. The difference in the T-cell response could be due to the fact that the MHC I locus of Balb/c mice is H-2d, while C57BL/6 is H-2b [38].
Here, we developed a whole genome peptide library of ZIKV to investigate the overall antigen-specific T-cell-mediated immunity in wild-type model mice (C57BL/6 and BALB/c). Previous studies indicated that DENV (Dengue virus) dominant epitopes were within NS3, NS4B, and NS5 [39,40], whereas the major T-cell antigens of HCV (Hepatitis C virus) were located in NS3, NS4A and NS5 [41,42,43]. However, only a few studies have demonstrated T-cell epitopes of ZIKV from envelope proteins [28,38]. Our data shows that T-cell response-targeted ZIKV protein profiles in H-2b and H-2d mice were obviously different. Both structural and non-structural proteins appeared to be targets of the anti-ZIKV T-cell response in H-2b mice, with E protein the primary target. However, non-structural proteins (NS1, NS3, NS4) showed a strong T-cell reaction in H-2d mice.
The difference in the T-cell response to immunodominant proteins (E protein) between ZIKV and other flaviviruses is very interesting. This is mainly possible due to the difference of species or alleles that we mentioned above. Additionally, there were 11/47 peptides from E protein inducing a high frequency of IFN-γ of CD8+ T cells in H-2b mice, which means shorter immunodominant epitopes of E protein recognized by H-2b than non-structural protein after ZIKV infection.
We provide a broad map of the T-cell response to ZIKV with identification of 91 and 39 peptides that target all viral proteins in H-2b and H-2d mice, respectively. The difference of MHC I locus may affect the recognition of peptides for T cells. The E, NS2, NS3 and NS5 protein induced a high frequency of IFN-γ-expressing CD8+ T cells, while E and NS4 responded to CD4+ T cell. Here we have a systematic analysis of the different activation characteristics of ZIKV proteins in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells with cytokines secreting, the NS4 protein libraries had more immunodominant peptides responding to CD4 subsets, which corresponds to the immune-thermogram analysis. These results demonstrated distinct dominance features of protein libraries to induce virus-specific CD8+/CD4+ T cells.
Moreover, multiple immunodominant epitopes such as E294-302 recognized by CD8+ T cells in H-2b mice were highly conserved to other flaviviruses. Previous studies have found that T-cell immunity to ZIKV and DENV induced responses that are cross-reactive with other flaviviruses in both humans and HLA transgenic mice [44]. Peptides and epitopes of ZIKV we identified in C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were important for understanding the characterization of ZIKV cross-protective immunity.
Among the positive peptides in H-2b and H-2d mice, respectively, the dominant epitopes of E283-302, NS1796-815, NS42130-2149, NS52519-2536 and NS42387-2406 were located at the junction of proteins. ZIKV, in the same way as like other flaviviruses, encodes a single polyprotein that is cleaved co-and post-translationally by cellular and viral proteases [45]. Identification of CD8+ T cell epitopes through proteasome cleavage site predictions reveals peptides that can bind to major histocompatibility complex (MHC I) molecules; the C-terminus of peptides presented by MHC I molecules result from proteasome cleavage [46,47]. It is possible that the cleavage sites of adjacent proteins are more susceptible to the protease; therefore, the processed epitopes are abundant for presentation by H-2 molecules and recognized by T cells on the surface of the flavivirus-infected cells.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our current study characterizes the mouse allele-dependent immune hierarchy against the whole ZIKV proteome, broaden the whole map, and draw the hotspots of the CD8+ T cell and CD4+ T cell epitope recognition profile of the virus. Our results serve to understand the T-cell immunogenic feature of ZIKV and may shed light on vaccine development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v14112332/s1. Figure S1: Peptides immune-thermogram analysis of CD8+ /CD4+ T cell in H-2b and H-2d mice.; Table S1: 2-D matrix pool.

Author Contributions

Designed and supervised the study, W.J.L., G.F.G., X.L. and H.Z.; performed the experiments, H.Z., W.X., M.Z., S.L. (Shuangshuang Lu), Y.Z. (Yongli Zhang), Y.Z. (Yingze Zhao), D.L., Q.Z., W.P., L.S., J.Z. (Jie Zhang), S.L. (Sai Liu), K.Z., P.W. and B.Y.; analyzed the data contributed to fruitful discussions and key ideas, H.Z., W.X., M.Z., W.J.L. and G.F.G.; wrote the manuscript, H.Z., W.X., M.Z., participated in the manuscript editing and discussion, S.L. (Shihua Li), S.T., F.Z., J.Z. (Jianfang Zhou), P.L. and G.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82161148008 and 81971501), Research Units of Adaptive Evolution and Control of Emerging Viruses, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2018RU009), and Excellent Young Scientist Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81822040).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of China CDC. The experiments and protocols were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC, and all experiments conform to the relevant regulatory standards. Studies with ZIKV were conducted under biosafety level 2 (BSL2) and animal BSL2 (A-BSL2) containment.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data required to interpret the data are provided in the main document or the Supplement Materials. Further data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all participants in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

All other authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Dick, G.W.A.; Kitchen, S.F.; Haddow, A.J. Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1952, 46, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Musso, D.; Gubler, D.J. Zika Virus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 29, 487–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Petersen, L.R.; Jamieson, D.J.; Powers, A.M.; Honein, M.A. Zika Virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 1552–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hofer, U. Viral Pathogenesis: Tracing the steps of Zika virus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dos Santos, T.; Rodriguez, A.; Almiron, M.; Sanhueza, A.; Ramon, P.; de Oliveira, W.K.; Coelho, G.E.; Badaró, R.; Cortez, J.; Ospina, M.; et al. Zika Virus and the Guillain-Barré Syndrome—Case Series from Seven Countries. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1598–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brasil, P.; Sequeira, P.C.; Freitas, A.D.A.; Zogbi, H.E.; Calvet, G.A.; de Souza, R.V.; Siqueira, A.M.; de Mendonca, M.C.L.; Nogueira, R.M.R.; de Filippis, A.M.B.; et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with Zika virus infection. Lancet 2016, 387, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. de Oliveira, W.K.; de França, G.V.A.; Carmo, E.H.; Duncan, B.B.; de Souza Kuchenbecker, R.; Schmidt, M.I. Infection-related microcephaly after the 2015 and 2016 Zika virus outbreaks in Brazil: A surveillance-based analysis. Lancet 2017, 390, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tang, H.; Hammack, C.; Ogden, S.C.; Wen, Z.; Qian, X.; Li, Y.; Yao, B.; Shin, J.; Zhang, F.; Lee, E.M.; et al. Zika Virus Infects Human Cortical Neural Progenitors and Attenuates Their Growth. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 18, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hoen, B.; Schaub, B.; Funk, A.L.; Ardillon, V.; Boullard, M.; Cabié, A.; Callier, C.; Carles, G.; Cassadou, S.; Césaire, R.; et al. Pregnancy Outcomes after ZIKV Infection in French Territories in the Americas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 985–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hancock, W.T.; Marfel, M.; Bel, M. Zika virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013. Emerg. Infect Dis. 2014, 20, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. D’Ortenzio, E.; Matheron, S.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; de Lamballerie, X.; Hubert, B.; Piorkowski, G.; Maquart, M.; Descamps, D.; Damond, F.; Leparc-Goffart, I. Evidence of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 2195–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Foy, B.D.; Kobylinski, K.C.; Chilson Foy, J.L.; Blitvich, B.J.; Travassos da Rosa, A.; Haddow, A.D.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Tesh, R.B. Probable non-vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 880–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barjas-Castro, M.L.; Angerami, R.N.; Cunha, M.S.; Suzuki, A.; Nogueira, J.S.; Rocco, I.M.; Maeda, A.Y.; Vasami, F.G.S.; Katz, G.; Boin, I.F.S.F.; et al. Probable transfusion-transmitted Zika virus in Brazil. Transfusion 2016, 56, 1684–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Joguet, G.; Mansuy, J.-M.; Matusali, G.; Hamdi, S.; Walschaerts, M.; Pavili, L.; Guyomard, S.; Prisant, N.; Lamarre, P.; Dejucq-Rainsford, N.; et al. Effect of acute Zika virus infection on sperm and virus clearance in body fluids: A prospective observational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 1200–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ma, W.; Li, S.; Ma, S.; Jia, L.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wong, G.; Zhang, S.; Lu, X.; et al. Zika Virus Causes Testis Damage and Leads to Male Infertility in Mice. Cell 2016, 167, 1511–1524.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Govero, J.; Esakky, P.; Scheaffer, S.M.; Fernandez, E.; Drury, A.; Platt, D.J.; Gorman, M.J.; Richner, J.M.; Caine, E.A.; Salazar, V.; et al. Zika virus infection damages the testes in mice. Nature 2016, 540, 438–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lai, L.; Rouphael, N.; Xu, Y.; Natrajan, M.S.; Beck, A.; Hart, M.; Feldhammer, M.; Feldpausch, A.; Hill, C.; Wu, H.; et al. Innate, T-, and B-Cell Responses in Acute Human Zika Patients. Clin. Infect Dis. 2018, 66, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Winkler, C.W.; Myers, L.M.; Woods, T.A.; Messer, R.J.; Carmody, A.B.; McNally, K.L.; Scott, D.P.; Hasenkrug, K.J.; Best, S.M.; Peterson, K.E. Adaptive Immune Responses to Zika Virus Are Important for Controlling Virus Infection and Preventing Infection in Brain and Testes. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 3526–3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, M.; Gao, F.; Zhou, J.; Kitamura, Y.; Gao, B.; Tien, P.; Shu, Y.; Iwamoto, A.; et al. Identification and structural definition of H5-specific CTL epitopes restricted by HLA-A*0201 derived from the H5N1 subtype of influenza A viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2010, 91 Pt 4, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, W.J.; Bi, Y.; Wang, D.; Gao, G.F. On the Centenary of the Spanish Flu: Being Prepared for the Next Pandemic. Virol. Sin. 2018, 33, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hassert, M.; Wolf, K.J.; Schwetye, K.E.; DiPaolo, R.J.; Brien, J.D.; Pinto, A.K. CD4+T cells mediate protection against Zika associated severe disease in a mouse model of infection. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cugola, F.R.; Fernandes, I.R.; Russo, F.B.; Freitas, B.C.; Dias, J.L.M.; Guimarães, K.P.; Benazzato, C.; Almeida, N.; Pignatari, G.C.; Romero, S.; et al. The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature 2016, 534, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lucas, C.G.O.; Kitoko, J.Z.; Ferreira, F.M.; Suzart, V.G.; Papa, M.P.; Coelho, S.V.A.; Cavazzoni, C.B.; Paula-Neto, H.A.; Olsen, P.C.; Iwasaki, A.; et al. Critical role of CD4 T cells and IFNγ signaling in antibody-mediated resistance to Zika virus infection. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hari, A.; Ganguly, A.; Mu, L.; Davis, S.P.; Stenner, M.D.; Lam, R.; Munro, F.; Namet, I.; Alghamdi, E.; Fürstenhaupt, T.; et al. Redirecting soluble antigen for MHC class I cross-presentation during phagocytosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Liu, J.; Wu, B.; Zhang, S.; Tan, S.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Z.; Qin, Y.; Sun, M.; Shi, G.; Wu, Y.; et al. Conserved epitopes dominate cross-CD8+ T-cell responses against influenza A H1N1 virus among Asian populations. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 2055–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pardy, R.D.; Rajah, M.M.; Condotta, S.A.; Taylor, N.G.; Sagan, S.M.; Richer, M.J. Analysis of the T Cell Response to Zika Virus and Identification of a Novel CD8+ T Cell Epitope in Immunocompetent Mice. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Huang, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Han, X.; Jia, B.; Liu, H.; Liu, D.; Tan, S.; Wang, Q.; Bi, Y.; et al. CD8(+) T Cell Immune Response in Immunocompetent Mice during Zika Virus Infection. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00900-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Elong Ngono, A.; Vizcarra, E.A.; Tang, W.W.; Sheets, N.; Joo, Y.; Kim, K.; Gorman, M.J.; Diamond, M.S.; Shresta, S. Mapping and Role of the CD8+ T Cell Response During Primary Zika Virus Infection in Mice. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Haddow, A.D.; Schuh, A.J.; Yasuda, C.Y.; Kasper, M.R.; Heang, V.; Huy, R.; Guzman, H.; Tesh, R.B.; Weaver, S.C. Genetic characterization of Zika virus strains: Geographic expansion of the Asian lineage. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Dudley, D.M.; Aliota, M.T.; Mohr, E.L.; Weiler, A.M.; Lehrer-Brey, G.; Weisgrau, K.L.; Mohns, M.S.; Breitbach, M.E.; Rasheed, M.N.; Newman, C.M.; et al. A rhesus macaque model of Asian-lineage Zika virus infection. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Osuna, C.E.; Lim, S.-Y.; Deleage, C.; Griffin, B.D.; Stein, D.; Schroeder, L.T.; Omange, R.W.; Best, K.; Luo, M.; Hraber, P.T.; et al. Zika viral dynamics and shedding in rhesus and cynomolgus macaques. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1448–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wen, J.; Tang, W.W.; Sheets, N.; Ellison, J.; Sette, A.; Kim, K.; Shresta, S. Identification of Zika virus epitopes reveals immunodominant and protective roles for dengue virus cross-reactive CD8+ T cells. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Manangeeswaran, M.; Ireland, D.D.; Verthelyi, D. Zika (PRVABC59) Infection Is Associated with T cell Infiltration and Neurodegeneration in CNS of Immunocompetent Neonatal C57Bl/6 Mice. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1006004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, R.; Liao, X.; Fan, D.; Wang, L.; Song, J.; Feng, K.; Li, M.; Wang, P.; Chen, H.; An, J. Maternal immunization with a DNA vaccine candidate elicits specific passive protection against post-natal Zika virus infection in immunocompetent BALB/c mice. Vaccine 2018, 36, 3522–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Medina-Magües, L.G.; Gergen, J.; Jasny, E.; Petsch, B.; Lopera-Madrid, J.; Medina-Magües, E.S.; Salas-Quinchucua, C.; Osorio, J.E. mRNA Vaccine Protects against Zika Virus. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, J.; Liu, X.; Ke, C.; Wu, Q.; Lu, W.; Qin, Z.; He, X.; Liu, Y.; Deng, J.; Xu, S.; et al. Effective Suckling C57BL/6, Kunming, and BALB/c Mouse Models with Remarkable Neurological Manifestation for Zika Virus Infection. Viruses 2017, 9, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Huber, S. T cells in coxsackievirus-induced myocarditis. Viral Immunol. 2004, 17, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schirmbeck, R.; Reimann, J. Enhancing the immunogenicity of exogenous hepatitis B surface antigen-based vaccines for MHC-I-restricted T cells. Biol. Chem. 1999, 380, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weiskopf, D.; Angelo, M.A.; de Azeredo, E.L.; Sidney, J.; Greenbaum, J.A.; Fernando, A.N.; Broadwater, A.; Kolla, R.V.; De Silva, A.D.; de Silva, A.M.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of dengue virus-specific responses supports an HLA-linked protective role for CD8+ T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E2046–E2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yauch, L.E.; Zellweger, R.M.; Kotturi, M.F.; Qutubuddin, A.; Sidney, J.; Peters, B.; Prestwood, T.R.; Sette, A.; Shresta, S. A protective role for dengue virus-specific CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4865–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ikram, A.; Zaheer, T.; Awan, F.M.; Obaid, A.; Naz, A.; Hanif, R.; Paracha, R.Z.; Ali, A.; Naveed, A.K.; Janjua, H.A. Exploring NS3/4A, NS5A and NS5B proteins to design conserved subunit multi-epitope vaccine against HCV utilizing immunoinformatics approaches. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Giugliano, S.; Oezkan, F.; Bedrejowski, M.; Kudla, M.; Reiser, M.; Viazov, S.; Scherbaum, N.; Roggendorf, M.; Timm, J. Degree of cross-genotype reactivity of hepatitis C virus-specific CD8+ T cells directed against NS3. Hepatology 2009, 50, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Eckels, D.D.; Zhou, H.; Bian, T.H.; Wang, H. Identification of antigenic escape variants in an immunodominant epitope of hepatitis C virus. Int. Immunol. 1999, 11, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Elong Ngono, A.; Chen, H.W.; Tang, W.W.; Joo, Y.; King, K.; Weiskopf, D.; Sidney, J.; Sette, A.; Shresta, S. Protective Role of Cross-Reactive CD8 T Cells Against Dengue Virus Infection. EBioMedicine 2016, 13, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kümmerer, B.M. Establishment and Application of Flavivirus Replicons. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1062, 165–173. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gomez-Perosanz, M.; Ras-Carmona, A.; Lafuente, E.M.; Reche, P.A. Identification of CD8(+) T cell epitopes through proteasome cleavage site predictions. BMC Bioinform. 2020, 21 (Suppl. 17), 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cascio, P.; Hilton, C.; Kisselev, A.F.; Rock, K.L.; Goldberg, A.L. 26S proteasomes and immunoproteasomes produce mainly N-extended versions of an antigenic peptide. Embo J. 2001, 20, 2357–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Design of overlapping ZIKV peptides and T-cell response to ZIKV proteins in H-2b and H-2d mice. (A) The full-length sequence (3423 amino acids) of the ZIKV proteome: C, prM, E, NS1, NS2, NS3, NS4, NS5. (B) Numbers of overlapping peptides in the eight ZIKV proteins. (C) Experimental flow chart: wild-type C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 6 per group) were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV. Mice were sacrificed at 14 days-post-infection (d.p.i.) and splenocytes isolated for ELISPOT testing. (D) Splenocytes were stimulated with difference protein libraries (C, prM, E, NS1, NS2, NS3, NS4, NS5) and detected with ELISPOT. A Student’s t-test was performed Error bars represent SEM; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Design of overlapping ZIKV peptides and T-cell response to ZIKV proteins in H-2b and H-2d mice. (A) The full-length sequence (3423 amino acids) of the ZIKV proteome: C, prM, E, NS1, NS2, NS3, NS4, NS5. (B) Numbers of overlapping peptides in the eight ZIKV proteins. (C) Experimental flow chart: wild-type C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 6 per group) were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV. Mice were sacrificed at 14 days-post-infection (d.p.i.) and splenocytes isolated for ELISPOT testing. (D) Splenocytes were stimulated with difference protein libraries (C, prM, E, NS1, NS2, NS3, NS4, NS5) and detected with ELISPOT. A Student’s t-test was performed Error bars represent SEM; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Viruses 14 02332 g001
Figure 2. Characterization of ZIKV proteins recognized by CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. (A,B) Wild-type C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 6 per group) were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with different protein libraries (C, prM, E, NS1, NS2, NS3, NS4, NS5) to assess cytokines production of IFN-γ (A), TNF-α and IL-2 (B) by ICS in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. A Student’s t-test was performed Error bars represent SEM; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Characterization of ZIKV proteins recognized by CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. (A,B) Wild-type C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice (n = 6 per group) were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with different protein libraries (C, prM, E, NS1, NS2, NS3, NS4, NS5) to assess cytokines production of IFN-γ (A), TNF-α and IL-2 (B) by ICS in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. A Student’s t-test was performed Error bars represent SEM; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Viruses 14 02332 g002
Figure 3. Mapped peptides according to location in the ZIKV polyprotein of H-2b and H-2d mice. Wild-type C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with the indicated matrix peptide pools. A total of 364 peptides were screened by IFN-γ-ELISPOT assays, with PMA as a positive control. (A,B) Left shows SFCs of 364 peptides distributed in the ZIKV polyprotein in H-2b (A) and H-2d (B) mice (n = 3 per peptide). Right shows the number of positive peptides for each protein, SFCs ≥ 40 in H-2b means positive.
Figure 3. Mapped peptides according to location in the ZIKV polyprotein of H-2b and H-2d mice. Wild-type C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with the indicated matrix peptide pools. A total of 364 peptides were screened by IFN-γ-ELISPOT assays, with PMA as a positive control. (A,B) Left shows SFCs of 364 peptides distributed in the ZIKV polyprotein in H-2b (A) and H-2d (B) mice (n = 3 per peptide). Right shows the number of positive peptides for each protein, SFCs ≥ 40 in H-2b means positive.
Viruses 14 02332 g003
Figure 4. Peptides immunothermogram analysis of CD8+/CD4+ T cell in H-2b and H-2d mice. Wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with above-positive peptides to assess cytokines production by ICS. The percentages and heat map analysis of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 produced in CD8+/CD4+T cells in H-2b and H-2d mice (n = 3 per peptide). Dashed lines between red and yellow are weakly positive, beyond red are strongly positive.
Figure 4. Peptides immunothermogram analysis of CD8+/CD4+ T cell in H-2b and H-2d mice. Wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with above-positive peptides to assess cytokines production by ICS. The percentages and heat map analysis of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 produced in CD8+/CD4+T cells in H-2b and H-2d mice (n = 3 per peptide). Dashed lines between red and yellow are weakly positive, beyond red are strongly positive.
Viruses 14 02332 g004
Figure 5. Identification of ZIKV epitopes recognized by CD8+ T cells in H-2b mice. Wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with epitopes (H-2b: Kb and Db) predicted from above-positive peptides. (A) Thirty-nine epitopes were identified by IFN-γ-ELISPOT assays. (B,C) The seven strongest positive epitopes from each protein are marked in the table (B). The percentages of IFN-γ produced in CD8+ T cells by stimulation with seven epitopes are represented, Con means without epitope stimulation (C). (D) Five tetramers were synthesized from seven positive epitopes and expression was determined by flow cytometry (n = 4).
Figure 5. Identification of ZIKV epitopes recognized by CD8+ T cells in H-2b mice. Wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were infected with 104 FFU of ZIKV, splenocytes were harvested at 14 d.p.i. and stimulated with epitopes (H-2b: Kb and Db) predicted from above-positive peptides. (A) Thirty-nine epitopes were identified by IFN-γ-ELISPOT assays. (B,C) The seven strongest positive epitopes from each protein are marked in the table (B). The percentages of IFN-γ produced in CD8+ T cells by stimulation with seven epitopes are represented, Con means without epitope stimulation (C). (D) Five tetramers were synthesized from seven positive epitopes and expression was determined by flow cytometry (n = 4).
Viruses 14 02332 g005
Table 1. H-2b peptides of ZIKV.
Table 1. H-2b peptides of ZIKV.
NamePeptides SequenceSCFs/106 CD4/CD8Epitopes SequenceMHCSCFs/106
C18-37KRGVARVSPFGGLKRLPAGL98NA
PrM142-161GEAISFPTTLGMNKCYIQIM76CD8ISFPTTLGMDb43
TLGMNKCYIDb94
PrM169-187ATMSYECPMLDEGVEPDDV265CD8/CD4MSYECPMLDb42
PrM244-262LIRVENWIFRNPGFALAAAA281CD8/CD4IFRNPGFALKb90
E283-302LLIAPAYSIRCIGVSNRDFV792CD8IGVSNRDFVDb836
E293-310CIGVSNRDFVEGMSGGTWV804CD8SNRDFVEGMDb220
E312-331DVVLEHGGCVTVMAQDKPTV118NA
E322-340TVMAQDKPTVDIELVTTTV284CD8
E331-349VDIELVTTTVSNMAEVRSY238CD8TTVSNMAEVDb104
E340-357VSNMAEVRSYCYEASISDMA402CD8EVRSYCYEASIKb758
RSYCYEASIDb218
E350-369CYEASISDMASDSRCPTQGE284NA
E389-408RGWGNGCGLFGKGSLVTCAK156NA
E409-428FACSKKMTGKSIQPENLEYR78CD8
E496-515MNNKHWLVHKEWFHDIPLPW60CD4
E506-525EWFHDIPLPWHAGADTGTPH296CD8/CD4
E536-555KDAHAKRQTVVVLGSQEGAV132CD8VLGSQEGAVKb110
E575-593SSGHLKCRLKMDKLRLKGV184NA
E584-602KMDKLRLKGVSYSLCTAAF260CD8/CD4
E593-612VSYSLCTAAFTFTKIPAETL42CD8VSYSLCTAAKb153
AAFTFTKIKb214
E603-622TFTKIPAETLHGTVTVEVQY88NA
E630-649KVPAQMAVDMQTLTPVGRLI40NAMAVDMQTLTPVDb114
E640-659QTLTPVGRLITANPVITEST357CD8/CD4
E650-668TANPVITESTENSKMMLEL338CD8
E679-697IGVGEKKITHHWHRSGSTI124NA
E688-706HHWHRSGSTIGKAFEATVR658NA
E705-724VRGAKRMAVLGDTAWDFGSV120NA
E744-763KSLFGGMSWFSQILIGTLLM704NA
E754-770SQILIGTLLMWLGLNTK144NA
E771-788NGSISLMCLALGGVLIFL216NA
NS1796-815VGCSVDFSKKETRCGTGVFV350NA
NS1806-825ETRCGTGVFVYNDVEAWRDR232CD8/CD4TGVFVYNDVKb144
NS1816-835YNDVEAWRDRYKYHPDSPRR124NA
NS1835-854RLAAAVKQAWEDGICGISSV140NA
NS1864-883SVEGELNAILEENGVQLTVV418NA
NS1835-855EENGVQLTVVVGSVKNPMWR266NA
NS1874-893RGPQRLPVPVNELPHGWKAW174NA
NS1903-922NELPHGWKAWGKSYFVRAAK328NA
NS1913-929GKSYFVRAAKTNNSFVV98NA
NS1920-939AAKTNNSFVVDGDTLKECPL82NA
NS1930-949DGDTLKECPLKHRAWNSFLV160NA
NS1940-958KHRAWNSFLVEDHGFGVFH194NA
NS1976-995AVIGTAVKGKEAVHSDLGYW102NA
NS11106-1125CCRECTMPPLSFRAKDGCWY88NA
NS21230-1248KVRPALLVSFIFRANWTPR202CD8VSFIFRANKb92
VSFIFRANWKb348
NS21283-1320LAIRAMVVPRTDNITLAILA90NA
NS21322-1341TCGGFMLLSLKGKGSVKKNL152NA
NS21332-1351KGKGSVKKNLPFVMALGLTA48CD4
NS21352-1371VRLVDPINVVGLLLLTRSGK208NA
NS21467-1486REIILKVVLMTICGMNPIAI130CD8VLMTICGMDb123
CGMNPIAIDb676
NS21477-1496TICGMNPIAIPFAAGAWYVY134NA
NS21487-1506PFAAGAWYVYVKTGKRSGAL224NA
NS31650-1667GLYGNGVVIKNGSYVSAI291CD8VVIKNGSYVDb332
NGSYVSAIDb236
NS31716-1734KTRLRTVILAPTRVVAAEM108NA
NS31754-1773HSGTEIVDLMCHATFTSRLL162CD4
NS31764-1783CHATFTSRLLQPIRVPNYNL164CD4
NS31791-1809FTDPSSIAARGYISTRVEM128CD8SSIAARGYIDb436
NS31855-1874TDHSGKTVWFVPSVRNGNEI111CD8/CD4PSVRNGNEIKb46
SVRNGNEIDb39
NS31936-1955ILDGERVILAGPMPVTHASA514NA
NS32092-2111LKPRWMDARVCSDHAALKSF259CD4
NS42130-2149GTLPGHMTERFQEAIDNLAV259CD8/CD4FQEAIDNLDb812
FQEAIDNLAVDb56
NS42158-2177RPYKAAAAQLPETLETIMLL88CD8/CD4QLPETLETIDb58
NS42168-2187PETLETIMLLGLLGTVSLGI112NA
NS42178-2194GLLGTVSLGIFFVLMRNKGI76CD8/CD4VSLGIFFVLMKb178
NS42275-2293LERTKSDLSHLMGRREEGA144NA
NS42284-2303HLMGRREEGATIGFSMDIDL124NA
NS42092-2116TIGFSMDIDLRPASAWAIYA180NA
NS42294-2313RPASAWAIYAALTTFITPAV236NA
NS42349-2367MGKGMPFYAWDFGVPLLMI84CD8YAWDFGVPLKb120
YAWDFGVPLLKb150
NS42358-2376WDFGVPLLMIGCYSQLTPL106CD4
NS42475-2492LWEGSPNKYWNSSTATSL180CD4
NS42483-2502YWNSSTATSLCNIFRGSYLA263CD8/CD4CNIFRGSYLKb236
NS42493-2512CNIFRGSYLAGASLIYTVTR77CD4
NS52503-2520GASLIYTVTRNAGLVKRR82NA
NS52519-2536RRGGGTGETLGEKWKARL286NA
NS52527-2545TLGEKWKARLNQMSALEFY108NA
NS52546-2525SYKKSGITEVCREEARRALK96NA
NS52566-2585DGVATGGHAVSRGSAKLRWL98NA
NS52605-2623GGWSYYAATIRKVQEVKGY76CD8WSYYAATIKb308
NS52667-2685IGESSSSPEVEEARTLRVL81CD8/CD4EVEEARTLDb168
NS52722-2741YGGGLVRVPLSRNSTHEMYW40CD8
NS52732-2751SRNSTHEMYWVSGAKSNTIK96CD8/CD4
NS52823-2842TWAYHGSYEAPTQGSASSLI338CD8/CD4
NS52833-2851PTQGSASSLINGVVRLLSK654CD8SSLINGVVRLDb382
NS52842-2859INGVVRLLSKPWDVVTGV58CD8/CD4
NS52850-2868SKPWDVVTGVTGIAMTDTT84CD4
NS52955-2973LVDKEREHHLRGECQSCVY142CD8
NS52991-3010GSRAIWYMWLGARFLEFEAL152CD8RAIWYMWLKb
GSRAIWYMDb
NS53064-3083SRFDLENEALITNQMEKGHR88NA
NS53093-3112TYQNKVVKVLRPAEKGKTVM88CD4
NS53216-3235WKPSTGWDNWEEVPFCSHHF54CD4TGWDNWEEVDb40
NS53311-3330PTGRTTWSIHGKGEWMTTED142CD8/CD4
Table 2. H-2d epitopes of ZIKV.
Table 2. H-2d epitopes of ZIKV.
NamePeptides SequenceSCFs/106CD4/CD8Epitopes SequenceMHCSCFs/106
C1-19MKNPKKKSGGFRIVNMLKR68CD4
C10-27GFRIVNMLKRGVARVSPF138NA
E283-302LLIAPAYSIRCIGVSNRDFV104NAAYSIRCIGVKd124
E293-311CIGVSNRDFVEGMSGGTWV64NA
E340-359VSNMAEVRSYCYEASISDMA72CD4SYCYEASIKd524
CYEASISDMKd108
E350-369CYEASISDMASDSRCPTQGE104CD8
E380-398YVCKRTLVDRGWGNGCGLF46NA
E429-448IMLSVHGSQHSGMIVNDTGH208CD4/CD8
E477-496GLDCEPRTGLDFSDLYYLTM122NA
E496-515MNNKHWLVHKEWFHDIPLPW44NA
E584-600KMDKLRLKGVSYSLCTAAF40NASYSLCTAAKd84
E640-659QTLTPVGRLITANPVITEST72CD4
E754-770SQILIGTLLMWLGLNTK96CD4
NS1940-958KHRAWNSFLVEDHGFGVFH56CD4/CD8
NS1996-1015IESEKNDTWRLKRAHLIEMK76CD4/CD8
NS11006-1025LKRAHLIEMKTCEWPKSHTL52CD4
NS11054-1071YRTQMKGPWHSEELEIRF1000CD8KGPWHSEELDd376
GYRTQMKGPWKd174
NS21239-1256FIFRANWTPRESMLLALA72CD4
NS21247-1266PRESMLLALASCLLQTAISA64CD8
NS21342-1360PFVMALGLTAVRLVDPINVV60CD4/CD8
NS21371-1390KRSWPPSEVLTAVGLICALA108CD4
NS21410-1428LIVSYVVSGKSVDMYIERA176CD4
NS21457-1476SLVEDDGPPMREIILKVVLM60CD4
NS21477-1496TICGMNPIAIPFAAGAWYVY184CD4
NS31544-1561QEGVFHTMWHVTKGSALR52CD4
NS31602-1621VPPGERARNIQTLPGIFKTK79NA
NS31640-1659PILDKCGRVIGLYGNGVVIK49NALYGNGVVIKd80
NS31791-1809FTDPSSIAARGYISTRVEM372CD4/CD8GYISTRVEMKd174
NS31800-1819RGYISTRVEMGEAAAIFMTA240CD8
NS32002-2020QDGLIASLYRPEADKVAAI208CD8LYRPEADKVKd158
NS42112-2129KEFAAGKRGAAFGVMEAL153NA
NS42120-2139GAAFGVMEALGTLPGHMTER168CD4/CD8
NS42304-2323RPASAWAIYAALTTFITPAV360CD4/CD8IYAALTTFIKd128
NS42349-2367MGKGMPFYAWDFGVPLLMI924CD8KGMPFYAWDFDd564
FYAWDFGVPLLKd230
NS42387-2406AHYMYLIPGLQAAAARAAQK963CD4/CD8LIPGLQAAAARAAQKH2-I168
NS42405-2423QKRTAAGIMKNPVVDGIVV78NA
NS42475-2492LWEGSPNKYWNSSTATSL1178CD4/CD8GSPNKYWNSSTATSLH2-I534
NS52638-2657SYGWNIVRLKSGVDVFHMAA1000CD4/CD8SYGWNIVRLKd66
NS53272-3291ETACLAKSYAQMWQLLYFHR124CD4/CD8SYAQMWQLLKd96
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Xiao, W.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, D.; Lu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Peng, W.; Shu, L.; et al. The CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell Immunogen Atlas of Zika Virus Reveals E, NS1 and NS4 Proteins as the Vaccine Targets. Viruses 2022, 14, 2332. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112332

AMA Style

Zhang H, Xiao W, Zhao M, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Lu D, Lu S, Zhang Q, Peng W, Shu L, et al. The CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell Immunogen Atlas of Zika Virus Reveals E, NS1 and NS4 Proteins as the Vaccine Targets. Viruses. 2022; 14(11):2332. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hangjie, Wenling Xiao, Min Zhao, Yingze Zhao, Yongli Zhang, Dan Lu, Shuangshuang Lu, Qingxu Zhang, Weiyu Peng, Liumei Shu, and et al. 2022. "The CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell Immunogen Atlas of Zika Virus Reveals E, NS1 and NS4 Proteins as the Vaccine Targets" Viruses 14, no. 11: 2332. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop