Next Article in Journal
Filoviruses: One of These Things is (not) Like the Other
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Roles of Viroporins Encoded by DNA Viruses: Novel Targets for Antivirals?
Previous Article in Journal
Interferon-Free Hepatitis C Treatment before and after Liver Transplantation: The Role of HCV Drug Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural and Functional Properties of the Hepatitis C Virus p7 Viroporin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Viroporins: Structures and functions beyond cell membrane permeabilization

1
Biophysics Unit (CSIC, UPV/EHU) and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), P.O. Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
2
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC, UAM), c/Nicolás Cabrera, 1, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2015, 7(10), 5169-5171; https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102866
Submission received: 17 September 2015 / Revised: 21 September 2015 / Accepted: 21 September 2015 / Published: 29 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viroporins)
Viroporins represent an interesting group of viral proteins that exhibit two sets of functions. First, they participate in several viral processes that are necessary for efficient production of virus progeny. Besides, viroporins interfere with a number of cellular functions, thus contributing to viral cytopathogenicity. Twenty years have elapsed from the first review on viroporins [1]; since then several reviews have covered the advances on viroporin structure and functioning [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. This Special Issue updates and revises new emerging roles of viroporins, highlighting their potential use as antiviral targets and in vaccine development.
Viroporin structure. Viroporins are usually short proteins with at least one hydrophobic amphipathic helix. Homo-oligomerization is achieved by helix–helix interactions in membranes rendering higher order structures, forming aqueous pores. Progress in viroporin structures during the last 2–3 years has in some instances provided a detailed knowledge of their functional architecture, including the fine definition of binding sites for effective inhibitors. A prominent example is that of the Hepatitis C virus p7 viroporin (see structures recently deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with entries: 3ZD0; 2M6X; 2MTS). New high-resolution structures have also advanced our understanding of the influenza virus M2 viroporin function and inhibition (see for instance structure with PDB entry 2MUV). In addition, new structural models for viroporins derived from other important human pathogens, such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus E and the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) small hydrophobic (SH) proteins, have been made available in the literature [9,10,11].
Based on the number of transmembrane domains (TMD) and the topology adopted in membranes, viroporins have been classified in two groups [4]. This categorization may also reflect the existence of different additional functions in each class, which can be modulated by the physicochemical landscape of the bilayer and the cell physiological factors evolving along the infectious cycle. Thus, viroporins may adapt to specific membrane environments altering the permeability of different compartments, and alter cell physiology by interacting with distinct sets of proteins (see below). Capacity for insertion into membranes according to different mechanisms may also condition these effects. Class I viroporins, composed of a single TMD, are assumed to insert co-translationally into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane using the translocon machinery. However, Class II viroporins containing two TMDs may insert following more complex mechanisms, including the insertion of a helical hairpin that is stabilized through inter-helical electrostatic interactions, or a post-translational insertion, with or without assistance of the translocon [12,13].
Finally, additional groups should be created for more complex viroporins, as is the case for rotavirus non-structural protein (NSP)-4, which contains three hydrophobic segments and should belong to Class III [14].
Viroporin functioning. Viroporins are multifaceted proteins that exert pleiotropic effects on several viral and cellular processes. The activity of viroporins is not only due to the formation of transmembrane pores, but also to their capacity to interact with other viral and cellular proteins. This protein–protein interaction varies according to the particular viroporin analysed; for instance Viral Protein Unique (Vpu) interacts with CD4 receptor and tetherin (BST2), thereby facilitating the budding of virus particles. The main activity of viroporins is to promote virus assembly and exit from infected cells. In general, viruses lacking the viroporin gene are very much weakened and the production of progeny viruses is very low. However, these viruses are still competent to enter cells.
A number of new emerging roles of viroporins are the object of intensive research. Thus, viroporins induce ER stress leading to increased concentrations of cytoplasmic calcium and also alter cell autophagy [15,16]. Disease progression is stimulated by viroporins due to activation of NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, thereby modulating the innate immune response [17]. Participation of viroporins in oncogenic processes has been documented by the action of E5 from human papillomavirus, the first oncogenic viroporin described [18].
New viroporins. Although viroporins have been mainly identified in RNA viruses, more recently these proteins have also been found in small DNA viruses. Most probably, the number of viroporins will increase in the foreseeable future. In this issue, particular attention is given to coronavirus E protein and to the small hydrophobic (SH) protein from paramixoviruses. Discovery of new viroporins is initially achieved by analysis of their primary sequence and by their ability to increase membrane permeability, as was the case for the aforementioned proteins [19,20,21,22,23].
Antiviral compounds and vaccine development. An important aspect of viroporins is their contribution to develop antiviral agents. Thus, high throughput screenings using p7 from hepatitis C virus have identified a number of specific inhibitors [24]. These inhibitors could be of interest, in combination with other antiviral compounds, in order to prevent the appearance of resistant viruses. In addition, these compounds constitute useful tools to study viroporin function. Finally, animal viruses lacking the viroporin gene represent an interesting source for the development of vaccines. Since the step being blocked in the life cycle is the egress of new virus particles, these viruses will be competent to enter into cells and express the rest of their genes [25].

References

  1. Carrasco, L. Modification of membrane permeability by animal viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 1995, 45, 61–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Gonzalez, M.E.; Carrasco, L. Viroporins. FEBS Lett. 2003, 552, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cook, G.A.; Zhang, H.; Park, S.H.; Wang, Y.; Opella, S.J. Comparative NMR studies demonstrate profound differences between two viroporins: p7 of HCV and Vpu of HIV-1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1808, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nieva, J.L.; Madan, V.; Carrasco, L. Viroporins: Structure and biological functions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. OuYang, B.; Chou, J.J. The minimalist architectures of viroporins and their therapeutic implications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1838, 1058–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Scott, C.; Griffin, S. Viroporins: Structure, function and potential as antiviral targets. J. Gen. Virol. 2015, 96, 2000–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fischer, W.B.; Li, L.H.; Mahato, D.R.; Wang, Y.T.; Chen, C.P. Viral channel proteins in intracellular protein-protein communication: Vpu of HIV-1, E5 of HPV16 and p7 of HCV. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1838, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fischer, W.B.; Hsu, H.J. Viral channel forming proteins - modeling the target. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1808, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, Y.; Surya, W.; Claudine, S.; Torres, J. Structure of a Conserved Golgi Complex-targeting Signal in Coronavirus Envelope Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 12535–12549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, Y.; To, J.; Verdià-Baguena, C.; Dossena, S.; Surya, W.; Huang, M.; Paulmichl, M.; Liu, D.X.; Aguilella, V.M.; Torres, J. Inhibition of the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Small Hydrophobic Protein and Structural variations in a bicelle environment. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 11899–11914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hsu, H.J.; Lin, M.H.; Schindler, C.; Fischer, W.B. Structure based computational assessment of channel properties of assembled ORF-8a from SARS-CoV.1. Proteins 2015, 83, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Martínez-Gil, L.; Bañó-Polo, M.; Redondo, N.; Sánchez-Martínez, S.; Nieva, J.L.; Carrasco, L.; Mingarro, I. Membrane integration of poliovirus 2B viroporin. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 11315–11324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bañó-Polo, M.; Martínez-Gil, L.; Wallner, B.; Nieva, J.L.; Elofsson, A.; Mingarro, I. Charge pair interactions in transmembrane helices and turn propensity of the connecting sequence promote helical hairpin insertion. J. Mol. Biol. 2013, 425, 830–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hu, L.; Crawford, S.E.; Hyser, J.M.; Estes, M.K.; Venkataram Prasad, B.V. Rotavirus non-structural proteins: Structure and Function. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012, 2, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Crawford, S.E.; Hyser, J.M.; Utama, B.; Estes, M.K. Autophagy hijacked through viroporin-activated calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase-beta signaling is required for rotavirus replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E3405–E3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fung, T.S.; Liu, D.X. Coronavirus infection, ER stress, apoptosis and innate immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ito, M.; Yanagi, Y.; Ichinohe, T. Encephalomyocarditis virus viroporin 2B activates NLRP3 inflammasome. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stonehouse, N.; Foster, R.; Blair, G.E.; Griffin, S.; Macdonald, A. High-risk human papillomavirus E5oncoprotein displays channel-forming activity sensitive to small-molecule inhibitors. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 5341–5351. [Google Scholar]
  19. Perez, M.; Garcia-Barreno, B.; Melero, J.A.; Carrasco, L.; Guinea, R. Membrane permeability changes induced in Escherichia coli by the SH protein of human respiratory syncytial virus. Virology 1997, 235, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Madan, V.; Garcia, M.J.; Sanz, M.A.; Carrasco, L. Viroporin activity of murine hepatitis virus E protein. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 3607–3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Liao, Y.; Lescar, J.; Tam, J.P.; Liu, D.X. Expression of SARS-coronavirus envelope protein in Escherichia coli cells alters membrane permeability. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 325, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liao, Y.; Tam, J.P.; Liu, D.X. Viroporin activity of SARS-CoV E protein. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2006, 581, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Carter, S.D.; Dent, K.C.; Atkins, E.; Foster, T.L.; Verow, M.; Gorny, P.; Harris, M.; Hiscox, J.A.; Ranson, N.A.; Griffin, S.; et al. Direct visualization of the small hydrophobic protein of human respiratory syncytial virus reveals the structural basis for membrane permeability. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 2786–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gervais, C.; Do, F.; Cantin, A.; Kukolj, G.; White, P.W.; Gauthier, A.; Vaillancourt, F.H. Development and validation of a high-throughput screening assay for the hepatitis C virus p7 viroporin. J. Biomol. Screen. 2011, 16, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Russell, R.F.; McDonald, J.U.; Ivanova, M.; Zhong, Z.; Bukreyev, A.; Tregoning, J.S. Partial Attenuation of Respiratory Syncytial Virus with a Deletion of a Small Hydrophobic Gene Is Associated with Elevated Interleukin-1β Responses. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 8974–8981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nieva, J.L.; Carrasco, L. Viroporins: Structures and functions beyond cell membrane permeabilization. Viruses 2015, 7, 5169-5171. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102866

AMA Style

Nieva JL, Carrasco L. Viroporins: Structures and functions beyond cell membrane permeabilization. Viruses. 2015; 7(10):5169-5171. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nieva, José Luis, and Luis Carrasco. 2015. "Viroporins: Structures and functions beyond cell membrane permeabilization" Viruses 7, no. 10: 5169-5171. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102866

APA Style

Nieva, J. L., & Carrasco, L. (2015). Viroporins: Structures and functions beyond cell membrane permeabilization. Viruses, 7(10), 5169-5171. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102866

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop