Next Article in Journal
Two Practical Methods to Retrieve Aerosol Optical Properties from Coherent Doppler Lidar
Previous Article in Journal
Extraction of Photovoltaic Plants Using Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study of the Pilot Energy City of Golmud, China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of Performance of Three Satellite-Derived Precipitation Products in Capturing Extreme Precipitation Events over Beijing, China

Remote Sens. 2022, 14(11), 2698; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112698
by Yu Li 1,2, Bo Pang 1,2,*, Meifang Ren 3, Shulan Shi 1,2, Dingzhi Peng 1,2, Zhongfan Zhu 1,2 and Depeng Zuo 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(11), 2698; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112698
Submission received: 14 April 2022 / Revised: 31 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 4 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Quantitative Remote Sensing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find the comments as attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper explored performance of three satellite-derived precipitation products in capturing extreme precipitation events over Beijing, china. The topic is interesting and has implications in extreme precipitation events over high-density urban agglomeration regions. The paper is well organized and written. The findings of this study are worth of publication in the journal after minor revision as follows:

1) When comparing extreme precipitation indexes, are the time ranges selected by these precipitation samples consistent? This will affect the comparability of 13 extreme precipitation indexes. Please explain clearly.

2) In addition, when matching the site data, is the point to pixel approach the closest match? The author should give a simple explanation. It may be difficult for readers to have the conditions or time to consult the literature to understand this method.

3) The precipitation data products of MSWEP and CMFD have integrated the rain gauge data. If they are compared with the site data, the overall effect should be better. It is suggested to have a brief discussion.

4) As far as Beijing is concerned, the resolution of 0.1 degree is still a little coarse. The distribution density of rain gauge determines the grid matching accuracy and comparison accuracy. It is suggested to discuss this issue.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop