Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Eryptosis Following Gramicidin Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial and Temporal Patterns in the Seasonal Distribution of Toxic Cyanobacteria in Western Lake Erie from 2002–2014
Previous Article in Journal
The Key Role of Peltate Glandular Trichomes in Symbiota Comprising Clavicipitaceous Fungi of the Genus Periglandula and Their Host Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrative Monitoring of Marine and Freshwater Harmful Algae in Washington State for Public Health Protection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 7
Issue 4
10.3390/toxins7041374
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

One Health and Cyanobacteria in Freshwater Systems: Animal Illnesses and Deaths Are Sentinel Events for Human Health Risks

by
Elizabeth D. Hilborn
1,* and
Val R. Beasley
2
1
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
2
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2015, 7(4), 1374-1395; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7041374
Submission received: 27 January 2015 / Revised: 10 April 2015 / Accepted: 13 April 2015 / Published: 20 April 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) and Public Health: Progress and Current Challenges)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Harmful cyanobacterial blooms have adversely impacted human and animal health for thousands of years. Recently, the health impacts of harmful cyanobacteria blooms are becoming more frequently detected and reported. However, reports of human and animal illnesses or deaths associated with harmful cyanobacteria blooms tend to be investigated and reported separately. Consequently, professionals working in human or in animal health do not always communicate findings related to these events with one another. Using the One Health concept of integration and collaboration among health disciplines, we systematically review the existing literature to discover where harmful cyanobacteria-associated animal illnesses and deaths have served as sentinel events to warn of potential human health risks. We find that illnesses or deaths among livestock, dogs and fish are all potentially useful as sentinel events for the presence of harmful cyanobacteria that may impact human health. We also describe ways to enhance the value of reports of cyanobacteria-associated illnesses and deaths in animals to protect human health. Efficient monitoring of environmental and animal health in a One Health collaborative framework can provide vital warnings of cyanobacteria-associated human health risks.

1. Introduction

1.1. Freshwater Cyanobacteria

Freshwater cyanobacteria and their toxins (cyanotoxins) pose risks to human and animal health via contamination of water sources and aquatic communities globally. Dense accumulations of cyanobacterial cells, or colonies are termed ‘blooms’ and these occur most commonly, but not exclusively, in nutrient-rich, warm, bodies of water with little movement or mixing among layers [1]. When cyanotoxins are produced, or when cyanobacterial biomass and/or cyanotoxins disrupt ecological processes, the events are loosely termed ‘harmful algal blooms’ (HABs). The World Health Organization has developed guidelines based upon cyanobacterial cell densities in water, and advises that the presence of dense scums near bathing areas may indicate substantial human health risks [2]. Although cyanobacteria are naturally-occurring, anthropogenic activities now contribute to increased occurrence of HABs globally [3]. Nutrient pollution from human and animal wastes that wash into surface waters, fertilizer applications, atmospheric nutrient deposition, burning of plant material, overgrazing, warmer weather, drought conditions that reduce terrestrial plant uptake of nutrients as well as reduce the depth and flow of water bodies all contribute to bloom formation [4]. Conditions that promote cyanobacteria occurrences are expected to increase based upon model projections of future human population growth, land use patterns and climate change [5].
Many genera of cyanobacteria produce potent toxins as secondary metabolites, some of which are released before, and others largely after, cyanobacterial lysis. The evolutionary value of cyanotoxins to their producers is not fully characterized, although benefits may include: quorum sensing, grazer deterrence, a potential competitive advantage in aquatic environments via allelopathy toward other cyanobacteria, and improved regulation of intracellular phosphate or electrolyte concentrations [6,7,8]. Cyanobacteria often produce foul taste and odor compounds such as geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol during their life cycle, senescence and decomposition [9,10]. These taste and odor compounds are not believed to present major health risks, but their potential toxicity has been little studied [11]. Importantly, these odorous compounds can indicate the need to prevent human and animal exposure to water that may also contain potentially lethal cyanotoxins [9].
During the 19th and most of the 20th century, the toxicity of water samples was assessed primarily by the use of the animal bioassay. Francis, in 1878 authored one of the first reports of the toxicological assessment of a harmful cyanobacterial bloom and the intentional use of an animal as an indicator of human health risk [12]. During the last 100 years, advances in investigative and diagnostic tools have helped characterize cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins, including: light microscopy with increasingly refined phycology and cyanobacterial taxonomy; and the identification and characterization of some cyanotoxins using molecular, chemical and biochemical assays [13,14]. During the latter part of the 20th century, over 100 unique cyanotoxins have been identified, and new compounds continue to be isolated, and structurally characterized. Multiple functional classes of cyanotoxins have now been described, including: hepatotoxins, neurotoxins, dermatotoxins and cytotoxins [15,16,17,18]. Examples of hepatotoxins include the cyclic peptides: microcystins and nodularins, although their effects are broader than liver toxicity alone. Cylindrospermopsin is a potent sulfated tricyclic guanidine cytotoxin with bioactive metabolites. Cyanobacterial neurotoxins include saxitoxin and neosaxitoxin, which are complex alkaloid sodium channel blockers, the cyclic alkaloid nicotinic agonists anatoxin-a and homoanatoxin-a, and the organophosphorus cholinesterase inhibitor anatoxin-a(s). Lyngbyatoxins are cyanobacterial dermatotoxins that occur in fresh, brackish, and marine waters. Cyanobacteria also produce lipopolysaccharides, which are general irritants [18]. No cyanotoxins are fully characterized for toxicity, for geographic occurrence, or for the environmental conditions necessary and sufficient for their production. Concerted research efforts are underway in many countries to characterize the occurrence of harmful cyanobacteria and their effects on ecosystem functions as well as human and animal health. However, the number of cyanotoxins and combinations of cyanotoxin mixtures in the environment complicates risk assessments focused on potentially harmful cyanobacterial exposures.

1.2. The Concept of “One Health”

“One Health” is a term that is increasingly being used in the early 21st century to convey how health rests upon interdependent collaborations among professionals in human and animal health, and wildlife and environmental sciences [19,20]. Nevertheless, the concept of One Health as a more inclusive and holistic way to study and maintain health within a cross-species continuum is ancient. Zinsstag et al. (2011) provided overviews of the origins, scope, systems thinking, and value of One Health, including how China’s Zhou Dynasty (11th–13th century) organized public health systems involving both medical doctors and veterinarians [21]. In the 1960s, Rachel Carson made connections between the application of highly toxic pesticides and adverse effects on human, domestic animal, and terrestrial and aquatic wildlife health. A One Health approach would have benefitted all of those involved in an incident of methylmercury intoxication in Japan in the 1950s [22]. A prolonged industrial release of methylmercury into waters off the coast of Minamata poisoned first fish and then birds; later cats and thousands of humans were sickened as the toxin spread throughout the food web. One Health insights relevant to infectious diseases were relied upon by such scientists as Edward Jenner, when, in developing a vaccine against smallpox (a human disease), he demonstrated the cross reactivity of human antibodies between smallpox and the less pathogenic cowpox (an animal disease). Countless other scientists, clinicians and public health practitioners have operated in a One Health paradigm in the pursuit of control of zoonotic disease, in food and water safety, as well as in environmental protection to optimize the health and wellbeing of earth’s biota. In short, One Health is a paradigm that recognizes the interdependence of human, animal, plant, microbial, and ecosystem health [23]. Effective multidisciplinary research, surveillance, and stewardship are essential for synchronous improvements in the health of humans, other animals, plants and ecosystems [19]. Recently, funding for public health from public and private sources has declined [24,25]. Unfortunately, this has coincided with reductions in essential public health services provided by functional ecosystems [26]. The One Health framework offers an interdisciplinary paradigm that seeks to optimize health by leveraging existing resources and capabilities among human, veterinary and ecosystem health experts to address some of the most the complex, multidisciplinary challenges that define the 21st century.
Reports of human health and animal health tend to be published separately and are discussed separately. However, harmful cyanobacteria impact both humans and animals. Animals often experience direct, high-intensity exposures to harmful cyanobacteria which result in illnesses and deaths. Cyanobacteria-associated animal illnesses or deaths can therefore be used to warn of risks and if heeded, action may be implemented to avoid adverse human health effects [27]. Our goal is to provide a representative overview of the adverse effects of harmful freshwater cyanobacteria on humans and other vertebrates and to comprehensively review reports that include incidents where animal illnesses and deaths have served as sentinel events to warn of potential or actual human health risks.

2. Selected Human Health Reports

Human health may be adversely impacted by harmful cyanobacteria from many sources, and via multiple routes of exposure. The highest impact outbreaks of cyanobacteria-associated intoxications and deaths have been reported when patients requiring hemodialysis were directly exposed to cyanotoxins intravenously via dialysate prepared from contaminated water [28,29]. This route of exposure to cyanotoxins resulted in toxic hepatitis, multi-organ damage and death [28,29,30,31].
People are most frequently exposed to harmful cyanobacteria via contaminated water. People may be exposed orally, dermally and occasionally by aspiration to aquatic microbial communities containing cyanobacterial cells and mixtures of cyanotoxins during recreational activities on or in untreated surface waters [32,33,34,35,36]. Occasionally, these exposures have resulted in severe respiratory impairment characterized by pneumonia and adult respiratory distress syndrome [32,35]. Less severe effects include fever, other respiratory illness, signs and symptoms of respiratory and dermal allergy, and dermatologic, gastrointestinal, neurologic, otic, and ocular signs and symptoms [33,34,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Occupational exposures to harmful cyanobacteria have been reported after routine work on an incidentally contaminated surface water body, in relation to investigation of a cyanobacterial bloom, and following an investigation of cyanobacteria-associated animal illnesses and deaths [34].
Drinking water contaminated with harmful cyanobacteria has been associated with liver and kidney damage [44,45], and rarely, severe illness, extended hospitalizations and deaths have occurred [45,46,47]. Acute health effects such as gastroenteritis, muscle pain and dermatitis associated with home use of contaminated drinking water have been reported [43,48]. When municipal systems have been contaminated, large numbers of people may be exposed and become ill [49,50,51,52,53]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has determined that, while current data on microcystins and nodularins are inconclusive in regard to human carcinogenesis, promotion of liver tumors by these toxins is plausible [54]. Zhou [55] reported that use of potentially microcystin-contaminated drinking water supplies was associated with higher rates of colorectal cancer in human populations in parts of China. Conventional drinking water treatment involving filtration, flocculation, and disinfection reduces, but does not always eliminate cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins. More sophisticated methods may be required to reduce cyanotoxins in finished drinking water to acceptable concentrations [56]. However, drinking water treatment processes may become impaired or ineffective when large quantities of cyanobacterial biomass enter the source water intake.
Some poorly characterized human health risks include: repeated voluntary exposure to cyanotoxins through ingestion of cyanobacteria (blue green algae) as food or as supplements [57,58]; involuntary exposure via inhalation of cyanotoxins during activities on or in contaminated waters, and ingestion of contaminated aquatic animal foods or vegetables grown with contaminated irrigation water [59,60,61,62].

3. Selected Animal Health Reports

HABs and associated adverse animal health impacts have been recorded for over 180 years. The first published report believed to document a harmful cyanobacteria bloom was by Hald to the Danish government in 1833. Hald described cattle and fish deaths associated with ‘sick’ lakes where green material covered the surface of the water. The bloom material itself was uncharacterized. Hald wrote that he did not know if the green substance was “…caused by water plants, insects or minerals…” [63].
Most early reports of animal deaths associated with harmful blooms were circumstantial. Waters were initially suspected of being harmful because of the temporal and spatial proximity of dead and dying animals observed in and around a bloom. Although the toxicity of these aquatic ‘plant’ materials was surmised by observation of associated animal deaths, the toxigenic organisms and the toxic principles themselves were uncharacterized. Francis was the first to scientifically investigate the toxic effects of a cyanobacterial bloom [12]. After mass livestock deaths in Lake Alexandrina in Australia, he administered a sample of the Nodularia spumigena bloom material from the lake to a sheep. He then compared necropsy results of the animal experimentally exposed with sheep that had died following natural exposure to the bloom and concluded that cyanobacteria were the source of the toxic effects.
Harmful cyanobacteria adversely affect wildlife, livestock and companion animals. Schwimmer and Schwimmer [64] compiled and summarized over 65 wildlife, livestock and domestic animal mortality events associated with cyanobacteria during 1878–1960. Animal deaths associated with harmful cyanobacteria have been reported from Europe, North America, South America, Australia, Africa and Asia [12,65,66,67,68,69]. Stewart, et al. [70] provided a selective review of published reports of cyanobacteria-associated animal morbidity and mortality events from around the world, with representative case studies of livestock, companion animal and wildlife deaths.
Reports of livestock deaths following exposures to cyanobacteria under field conditions have been reported from every inhabited continent and involved ruminants, hogs, horses, fowl, cultured fish and even honeybees [65,66,71,72,73,74,75]. Livestock with access to farm ponds and portions of lakes may be at risk of exposure during a bloom, especially when wind-driven surface blooms accumulate at the site of animals’ water access. Overflow of bloom material from farm ponds that contaminates animals’ pasture can also be a source of poisoning for livestock [76]. Antemortem signs of intoxication vary and are dependent upon the cyanotoxins, the dose and time frames involved, the therapeutic interventions employed and individual characteristics of the exposed animals. Acute effects often include: hypersalivation, agitation, anorexia, pale mucus membranes, weakness, dyspnea, recumbancy, depression, ataxia, diarrhea, muscle tremors and fasciculations, convulsions, apparent blindness and sudden death [77,78,79]. Birds may display weakness and neurologic signs such as ataxia, and hyperextended necks (opisthotonos) prior to death. Cyanobacteria have been associated with mass mortality events in catfish and carp cultured in ponds; microcystins in water were accompanied by clinical signs of illness and gross lesions in the liver [73,75]. Because of microcystin residues, the latter authors (Singh and Asthana) cautioned against human consumption of the tissues of contaminated fish.
Reports of cyanobacteria-associated companion animal illnesses and deaths have most often involved dogs. Dogs have been observed consuming scums of cyanobacteria that accumulate near the shore, drinking contaminated water, and licking bloom material from their hair coats after wading or swimming [80]. A recent summary of cyanobacteria-associated dog deaths in the United States compiles over 100 reports over the last 80 years [81]. The frequency of reporting of these events has greatly increased since the 1970s, however, reporting, attribution and detection biases were all factors that influenced the number of events that were confirmed as being associated with cyanobacteria during the study period. Deaths among other companion animal deaths such as cats are rarely reported [77]. Acute effects among companion animals include: vomiting, diarrhea, profuse salivation, weakness, convulsions, hemorrhage and sudden death [82,83].
Wildlife deaths associated with harmful freshwater cyanobacterial blooms are commonly reported, but undoubtedly many occur and are unreported because of the lack of human observation of the event. Multiple types of vertebrates may be harmed, from fish to birds to mammals [84,85,86]. In some instances it is not always possible to attribute wildlife deaths to harmful cyanobacteria because when the affected animals are found, they are too decomposed for reliable pathological and toxicological analyses. Fish and water birds are at especially high risk of harmful cyanobacteria-associated effects, and mass mortality events have been reported from most continents [66,68,85,87,88]. Cyanobacteria blooms may have direct and indirect adverse effects on fish and water birds. Direct intoxication may occur after exposure to harmful cyanobacteria, or cyanotoxin-contaminated food and water. Indirect effects of cyanobacterial blooms include a decrease in dissolved oxygen and the proliferation of Clostridium botulinum [89]. Large mortality events have occurred when birds are poisoned by botulinum toxin in aquatic environments [90,91].

4. Results: Animal Illnesses and Deaths that Served as Sentinel Events for Cyanobacteria-Associated Human Health Risks

Our search of the scientific literature yielded 18 reports describing at least 29 events where there were actual or potential cyanobacteria-associated human health risks accompanied by observations of sick or dead animals that were exposed to harmful cyanobacteria (Table 1). These episodes of human health risks have occurred among drinking water consumers, among workers investigating mass mortality events, and among recreational users of water bodies that were contaminated with cyanobacteria. Eleven of 18 reports describe animal illnesses or deaths that alerted authorities to the presence of contaminated water and warnings were issued and/or action was taken to prevent human exposure.
Table 1. Reports of animal illnesses and deaths that served as sentinel events for cyanobacteria-associated human health risks.
Table 1. Reports of animal illnesses and deaths that served as sentinel events for cyanobacteria-associated human health risks.
Location; referenceYearNumber eventsCyanobacteriaToxinAnimal illnessHuman illness, exposure routeInteragency coordination
Lake Alexandrina, Australia; [92]1878>1Nodularia spumigena identified in waterUnknownSeveral hundred livestock deathsUndescribed illness in one individual after drinking contaminated water Investigation, warnings issued prior to human illness
Elk River, Kanawha River, Ohio River, West Virginia; Ohio River Ohio; Ohio River, Kentucky, United States; [50]1930–1931>6Anabaena flos-aquae identified in waterUnknownFish deaths Kanawha RiverGastrointestinal illness among thousands of people receiving drinking water from riversInvestigation, no known warnings issued
Storm Lake, Iowa, United States; [85]1948>1Anabaena flos-aquae identified in waterUnknownFish, dogs diedNone reportedInvestigation, warnings issued
Lake Dauphin, Manitoba, Canada; [77]19511Aphanizomenon flos-aquae identified in waterUnknownHorse, dogs diedNone reportedInvestigation, warnings issued
Echo Lake, Qu’Appelle Lake, other lakes in Saskatchewan, Canada; [93,94]1959>2Anabaena circinalis (identified in stool sample)UnknownMultiple livestock, fish, geese, dogs diedGastrointestinal illness among individuals with recreational exposure to lakesInvestigation, warnings issued prior to human illness
Hegman Reservoir, Montana, United States; [95]19771Anabaena spp. and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae identified in waterUnknownCattle, dogs diedNone reportedInvestigation, warnings issued
Lakes in Pennsylvania, United States; [40]19792Anabaena spp. identified in waterUnknownDog illnessNone reportedInvestigation, warnings issued before dog illness
Lake in Montana, United States; [96]19841Unspecified bloom identified in waterUnknownCattle deathsNone reportedInvestigation, warnings issued
Lake in Alberta, Canada; [97]19851Unspecified bloom identified in waterUnknownBats, ducks diedNone reportedInvestigation, warnings issued
Guandiana River in Portugal; [98]19871Aphanizomenon flos-aquae bloom identified in waterUnknownFish deathsGastroenteritis, dermatitis among those who consumed drinking waterNone known
Lake—Rutland Water in Leicestershire, United Kingdom; [99]19891Microcystis aeruginosa bloom identified in waterMicrocystin-LRDog and sheep deathsGastroenteritis, dermatitis among those who recreated in waterInvestigation, no known warnings issued
Zeekoevlei Lake, and others, near or in Western Cape Province, South Africa; [100,101]19944Nodularia spumigena and Microcystis aeruginosa bloom identified in waterNodularin, Microcystin-LRDog and livestock deathsNone reportedInvestigation, warnings issued
Pond in Mymensingh, Bangladesh; [74]20021Anabaena flos-aquae and Microcystis aeruginosa bloom identified in waterUnknownFish and goat deathsRash, eye and ear irritationInvestigation, no known warnings issued
River Meuse, Venlo Municipality, Netherlands; [102]20031Unspecified cyanobacteriaUnknownFish and bird deathsRashInvestigation, no known warnings issued
Buccaneer Bay Lake, multiple other lakes, Eastern Nebraska, United States; [42]2004>3Anabaena, Microcystis, Oscillatoria, Aphanizo-menonMicrocystin-LR and microcystinsDog, livestock, wildlife deathsMore than 50 reports of rash, skin lesions, headache and/or gastroenteritisInvestigation, warnings issued
Lakes, Ohio, United States; [36]20102Anabaena spp., Cylindro-spermopsis raciborskii, Aphanizomenon spp., Planktolyngbya limneticaMicrocystins, Anatoxin-a cylindrospermop-sin, saxitoxinsDog, fish deaths, bird illnessMultiple effects including dermatologic, respiratory, neurologic illness and/or gastroenteritisInvestigation, no known warnings issued
In multiple instances, reports of animal deaths prompted investigations that led to the initial isolation and structural characterization of cyanotoxins from a water body without a specified use for drinking or recreation. One such report is Devlin et al. [103], who isolated and cultured a cyanobacterium associated with cattle deaths and determined the structure of anatoxin-a for the first time. In some instances, the toxic mechanism of action was first deduced in studies conducted after animals died in the field, and those mechanisms later were used for toxin isolation and structural elucidation. For example, after dog and other animal deaths were observed in a lake in South Dakota, United States, Mahmood et al. [104] detected a cholinesterase-inhibiting cyanotoxin for the first time. Subsequent studies based upon that biochemical mechanism led to characterization of anatoxin-a(s), the only known naturally occurring organophosphorous cholinesterase-inhibiting toxin [105].
Animal deaths have also been the trigger for the first regional detections of harmful cyanobacteria and specific cyanotoxins. Skulberg [87] raised awareness of problems from harmful cyanobacteria in Europe’s eutrophic waters by summarizing the findings of a 1980 survey performed in 26 European countries. At that time, eleven countries reported outbreaks of blue-green algae-associated animal intoxications. James [106] reported detecting anatoxin-a in Irish lakes for the first time during the summers of 1994 and 1995; the investigations followed reports of potentially toxic cyanobacteria-associated dog deaths at lakes during 1992 and 1993. Multiple reports of dog deaths in Scotland, New Zealand and France led to the finding of anatoxin-a in the absence of surface blooms; instead, the cyanotoxin was found to be associated with benthic cyanobacteria [83,107,108]. Mez et al. [109] reported isolation of microcystins from Swiss oligotrophic water for the first time after observing a pattern of cattle deaths.

5. Discussion

We found 18 reports of 29 or more events where animal illnesses and deaths served as potential sentinel events for human health risks related to harmful cyanobacteria [36,40,42,50,74,77,85,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102]. Among 15 of 18 reports describing 25 or more events, cyanobacteria-associated animal illness clearly preceded any reports of human illness [36,42,50,77,85,92,93,94,95,96,97,99,100,101,102]. Among 11 of 18 reports describing 15 or more events, cyanobacteria-associated animal illness or death was recognized, authorities were alerted to the presence of contaminated water, and action was taken to warn people of the risk associated with exposure to potentially toxic water [42,77,85,92,93,94,95,96,97,100,101]. We found that among the instances where sentinel events were used to warn of the potential for human health risks there was effective communication among environmental, wildlife and health officials.
We selectively described multiple additional reports of animal deaths that alerted investigators to the potential presence of harmful cyanobacteria, some even in the absence of an apparent surface bloom. These bodies of water were not reported as being used for human recreation or drinking water, so the risk for adverse human health effects was unclear [83,103,104,106,107,108,109]. However, the animal illnesses and deaths acted as sentinel events that warned of potential cyanobacteria-associated water toxicity.
Dogs, livestock and fish were most frequently cited as animals involved in sentinel events that warned of harmful cyanobacteria. Dogs in particular may be exposed to surface water bodies as they accompany people during recreation and some outdoor types of work. Dogs are likely to drink water they encounter and may ingest algal scums that are present. Dogs acted as sentinels of human health risk in 17 or more events, these events involved primarily recreational water sources, and one event described a poisoning at a potential drinking water source [36,40,42,77,85,93,94,95,99,100]. Livestock historically have been given access to ponds or lakes that people may use for recreation or drinking water. Types of livestock reportedly involved in sentinel events included primarily cattle and horses; fewer reports involved pigs and smaller ruminants. Livestock acted as sentinels of human health risks in 15 or more events, nine of these were described at recreational water sources, and at least two were described at potential drinking water sources [42,74,77,92,93,94,95,96,99,101]. Fish are raised in ponds as livestock, but also are free-living in lakes, rivers, and other water bodies. Fish acted as sentinels of human health risks in at least 14 events, seven of these were described at recreational waters, and seven were described at drinking water sources [36,50,74,85,93,98,102].
History has shown that the presence of dead or moribund animals in and around a body of water has served as a warning of potential human health risk associated with the water [63]. However, animal illnesses and deaths only effectively warn of human health risks if they are actually seen and the risk recognized. Therefore, it is important for animal deaths potentially associated with harmful cyanobacteria to be investigated and warnings to be issued to potential water users in a timely manner. Ideally, information should be transmitted from those who first encounter dead or dying animals, to wildlife or environmental stewards, veterinarians and public safety personnel. Samples of water and affected animals should be evaluated by laboratory and veterinary professionals. People with health effects should be referred to health care providers. The results of clinical and laboratory analyses should be communicated to investigators and primary reporters as well as to regulatory officials. Regulatory officials should develop monitoring programs and incident response protocols in concert with water and wildlife agencies, and develop and distribute educational materials and perform outreach to those potentially impacted by harmful cyanobacteria with the goal of risk reduction. Clinical care providers should be provided with information on sources and health impacts of harmful cyanobacteria as well as any established diagnostic methods and criteria. Therefore, wildlife, veterinary, medical, water management, laboratory and public health officials may all be potentially involved in a successful response to the occurrence of harmful cyanobacteria (Figure 1) [77,85,93,94].
Unfortunately, communication among these groups is not always frequent or timely, suggesting that there may be significant professional, structural and institutional barriers to adopting the widespread use of sentinel events to protect human health [110]. Auf der Heide notes that in smaller communities, where few public professionals are employed, professionals from multiple disciplines may actually interact more frequently and perform more efficiently and cohesively in the face of unusual or emergent health events [110]. In larger communities with frequent cyanobacterial blooms, providing the opportunity for intentional communication and collaboration activities among these groups before concerted action is needed may be rewarded by more efficient human, animal and environmental health protection.
The One Health initiative provides a framework for multidisciplinary interaction and cooperation among specialists in human, animal and environmental health [19]. This approach has most frequently been applied to the identification and control of zoonotic diseases, but there is a need for coordination among professionals who normally focus solely on human, domestic animal, or wildlife/ecological toxicology as well [111,112]. Commonly-occurring environmental contaminants such as harmful cyanobacteria are human health hazards for which a One Health approach is being successfully applied. A number of the reports of integrated surveillance and preventive measures mentioned above attest to the value of attention to multiple species groups, but these are largely “after-the-fact” responses, when what is needed is to be more proactive.
Figure 1. Functional groups and flow of information in a model One Health approach to harmful cyanobacteria identification, risk characterization and response. Primary Reporters include: Those who live, recreate or work on or near cyanobacteria-impacted water bodies such as: residents of water front homes; animal owners; lake and waterkeepers; environmental professionals; wildlife professionals; water management and utility personnel; fishermen; public safety personnel. Laboratory and Health Professionals include: Chemists, phycologists, wildlife biologists, agricultural specialists, toxicologists, veterinary pathologists, veterinarians and human health care providers. Regulatory Officials include: Public health, environmental health, environmental management, wildlife and agricultural personnel.
Figure 1. Functional groups and flow of information in a model One Health approach to harmful cyanobacteria identification, risk characterization and response. Primary Reporters include: Those who live, recreate or work on or near cyanobacteria-impacted water bodies such as: residents of water front homes; animal owners; lake and waterkeepers; environmental professionals; wildlife professionals; water management and utility personnel; fishermen; public safety personnel. Laboratory and Health Professionals include: Chemists, phycologists, wildlife biologists, agricultural specialists, toxicologists, veterinary pathologists, veterinarians and human health care providers. Regulatory Officials include: Public health, environmental health, environmental management, wildlife and agricultural personnel.
Nations in Europe have developed One Health guidelines to reduce health risks associated with harmful cyanobacteria. For example, in Scotland, a set of guidelines for risk assessment of cyanobacteria-impacted waters has been developed and updated with the goal of protecting both human and animal health [113]. The responsibility to initially assess the potential risks to human and animal health from harmful cyanobacteria has been assigned to water quality officials and workers, public and environmental health officials and interested individuals. Guidelines for incident investigation, reporting and deployment of warnings to the public have been developed. France has developed the SAGIR (surveiller les maladies de la faune sauvage pour agir), a surveillance network for zoonotic disease and environmental toxins which includes the Fédérations des chasseurs and l’Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage. Hunters report wildlife mortality events to SAGIR, which then prompts wildlife personnel to investigate the animal death(s) and accompanying environmental conditions. This helps to maximize the early detection of emerging health threats, informs risk assessment and ultimately contributes to the protection of animal and human health [114].
In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health had historically provided funding to states to collect reports of cyanobacteria-associated human and animal health, but funding has ended and not all member states are able to continue related activities [81]. Currently, efforts are underway to incorporate reports of animal and human illness associated with harmful algal blooms into the CDC National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS), a voluntary national system that receives reports of food-borne, waterborne and other outbreaks of human illness [115]. Although the incorporation of human and animal-related illnesses and deaths into NORS will raise general awareness about harmful cyanobacteria among some state health officials, it is currently too early to see if these efforts will be successful in fostering integration and communication among human, animal and environmental health specialists that will lead to a One Health collaborative framework for integrated health protection.

Limitations and Sources of Uncertainty

Cyanobacteria blooms do not always produce toxins, and cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin concentrations are heterogeneous spatially and temporally [116]. Acute animal illnesses and deaths are useful as indicators of human health risks, but harmful cyanobacterial blooms may exist in the absence of dead or impaired animals [117]. Therefore, the absence of animal illness and death at a water body should not be interpreted that no risk, or minimal human health risk exists.
Published reports of cyanobacteria-associated animal death and illness are relatively uncommon. Many events are inaccessible to the public as they remain in the notes and files of wildlife officials, public and environmental health personnel, and veterinarians. Many cases of suspected cyanotoxin poisoning are not confirmed because of the limited availability and cost of cyanotoxin analyses. An expanded review and report of all data sources including those: presented through the broadcast media, published in print, on-line and in newsletters, and stored in medical (human health and veterinary) records, and records of public, environmental health and wildlife officials would likely augment the total number of recognized events where animals have acted as sentinels for cyanobacteria-associated human health risks.
For an animal death to serve as a sentinel event of cyanobacteria-associated risk, people must observe the animal’s remains in a timely manner. Carcasses of smaller species will not necessarily persist in the environment. Such deaths, especially if few animals are involved, may often be missed by human observers. Conversely, large numbers of smaller animals that are obvious to the observer, large animals whose carcasses persist in the environment, and human-affiliated animals such as companion animals or livestock are more likely to be observed and recorded.
When dead animals are observed, prompt notification of veterinary, wildlife or health officials is needed to determine a cause for the deaths. However, a prompt post-mortem examination alone is insufficient to conclude that a death is associated with harmful cyanobacteria [118]. Chen et al. suggested that analysis of the contents of the gastrointestinal tract may provide a useful indication of the recent composition of cyanobacteria at the collection site [119]. Animals appear to bioaccumulate cyanotoxins at different rates so that tissue concentrations evaluated at the time of death may not reflect current environmental conditions at the collection site [120]. Animals of different species also vary in susceptibility to certain cyanotoxins, but the basis of this variation remains to be well characterized [121].
Cyanobacteria may persist in water bodies and may recur at a given site. However, a previous mass mortality event correctly attributed to cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins, does not mean that a subsequent event at the same site has the same causation. For example, mass bird and fish mortality events in Donaña National Park, Spain in 2001 were confirmed to be associated with microcystins [122], but mass bird deaths at the same site in 2003 were eventually attributed to an infectious etiology, Pasteurella spp. [123].
Some freshwater biotoxins have not been included in this review due to insufficient information about human health risks. These include: emerging toxins such as β-methylamino-ʟ-alanine (BMAA), or toxins that are currently only associated with animal toxicity such as the recently reported causative agent of avian vacuolar myelinopathy (AVM) [124,125]. However, these contaminants may potentially play a larger role in future reports of outbreaks of illness that involve both animals and humans.

6. Conclusions

This report illustrates how the recognition of and response to cyanobacteria-associated animal illnesses and deaths may be used to reduce the risks associated with human exposures to harmful cyanobacteria. Using a One Health approach is an efficient way to manage an environmental risk that involves multiple disciplines and professional specialties. Currently, barriers to maximizing the value of animals as sentinels in this context include: under reporting; limited resources for surveillance and investigation of events; and the potential lack of routine means of communication among potential One Health partners in environmental health, environmental management, human and veterinary medicine [111]. To enhance the value of animal sentinel events for harmful cyanobacteria-associated human health risk, we recommend:
  • Engaging public health, domestic animal health, wildlife and ecosystem health personnel in group training and communication exercises.
  • Developing improved methods to support identification and quantification of harmful cyanobacteria in water sources and analyses of cyanotoxins in cyanobacteria, water, and biological samples from exposed animals and humans.
  • Including reports of harmful algal blooms and associated human and animal illness in health and environmental surveillance systems.
  • Using successful models such as the Scottish risk assessment reporting guidelines and SAGIR to improve harmful cyanobacteria recognition and response in other nations around the world [113,114].
Such actions, combined with greater global awareness of harmful algal blooms as a multidisciplinary problem should increase the utility of reports of animal illnesses and deaths to inform the characterization of human health risks.

7. Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed and Web of Science databases for the terms: “(cyanobacter* AND animal)”; “(blue-green algae AND animal)”; “(cyanobacter* AND human)”; “(blue-green algae AND human)”; “(cyanobacter* AND health)”; “(blue-green algae AND health)”. We restricted these records to: (1) reports of animal exposures to cyanobacteria, cyanotoxins or uncharacterized freshwater blooms and evaluated these to determine if there was a human health or ambient human exposure component also described; (2) among reports of cyanobacteria-associated human illness, we assessed if there was animal death or illness also reported from the site of exposure. When more than one report described a single event, we chose the most comprehensive report(s) of human health exposure and effects. References of all reports were examined to identify other applicable reports to include in the review.

Acknowledgments

We thank librarians and staff members of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s library at Research Triangle Park, North Carolina for technical assistance and for access to reference material. We thank Madeleine LaRue and Whitney Krueger, ORISE Participants, funded by the Environmental Protection Agency, for their thoughtful review.

Author Contributions

Elizabeth D. Hilborn and Val R. Beasley conceived of and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this report are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

References

  1. Mur, L.R.; Skulberg, O.M.; Utkilen, H. Cyanobacteria in the environment. In Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring, and Management; Chorus, I., Bartram, J., Eds.; E & FN Spon, for World Health Organization, Routledge: London, UK, 1999; pp. 15–40. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments. Volume 1: Coastal and Fresh Waters; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. Available online: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241545801.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015).
  3. Paerl, H.W.; Hall, N.S.; Calandrino, E.S. Controlling harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a world experiencing anthropogenic and climatic-induced change. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 1739–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Davis, T.W.; Berry, D.L.; Boyer, G.L.; Gobler, C.J. The effects of temperature and nutrients on the growth and dynamics of toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis during cyanobacteria blooms. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Paerl, H.W.; Paul, V.J. Climate change: Links to global expansion of harmful cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2012, 46, 1349–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wiegand, C.; Pflugmacher, S. Ecotoxicological effects of selected cyanobacterial secondary metabolites a short review. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 203, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Holland, A.; Kinnear, S. Interpreting the possible ecological role(s) of cyanotoxins: Compounds for competitive advantage and/or physiological aide? Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 2239–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Freitas, E.C.; Printes, L.B.; Rocha, O. Acute effects of Anabaena spiroides extract and paraoxon-methyl on freshwater cladocerans from tropical and temperate regions: Links between the ChE activity and survival and its implications for tropical ecotoxicological studies. Aquat. Toxicol. 2014, 146, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Graham, J.L.; Loftin, K.A.; Meyer, M.T.; Ziegler, A.C. Cyanotoxin Mixtures and Taste-and-Odor Compounds in Cyanobacterial Blooms from the Midwestern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7361–7368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jüttner, F.; Watson, S.B. Biochemical and ecological control of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in source waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 4395–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Burgos, L.; Lehmann, M.; de Andrade, H.H.R.; de Abreu, B.R.R.; de Souza, A.P.; Juliano, V.B.; Dihl, R.R. In vivo and in vitro genotoxicity assessment of 2-MIB taste and odor in water. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 100, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Francis, G. Poisonous Australian lake. Nature 1878, 18, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lawton, L.; Marsalek, B.; Padisák, J.; Chorus, I. Determination of cyanobacteria in the laboratory. In Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring, and Management; Chorus, I., Bartram, J., Eds.; E & FN Spon, for World Health Organization, Routledge: London, UK, 1999; pp. 347–367. [Google Scholar]
  14. Harada, K.-I.; Kondo, F.; Lawton, L. Laboratory analysis of cyanotoxins. In Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring, and Management; Chorus, I., Bartram, J., Eds.; E & FN Spon, for World Health Organization, Routledge: London, UK, 1999; pp. 369–405. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carmichael, W.W. Health Effects of Toxin-Producing Cyanobacteria: “The CyanoHABs”. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2001, 7, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Codd, G.A.; Lindsay, J.; Young, F.M.; Morrison, L.F.; Metcalf, J.S. Harmful Cyanobacteria: From mass mortalities to management measures. In Aquatic Ecology Series; Huisman, J., Matthijs, H.C.P., Visser, P.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; Volume 3, pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  17. Valério, E.; Chaves, S.; Tenreiro, R. Diversity and impact of prokaryotic toxins on aquatic environments a review. Toxins 2010, 2, 2359–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sivonen, K.; Jones, G. Cyanobacterial toxins. In Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring, and Management; Chorus, I., Bartram, J., Eds.; E & FN Spon, for World Health Organization, Routledge: London, UK, 1999; pp. 41–111. [Google Scholar]
  19. King, L.J.; Anderson, L.R.; Blackmore, C.G.; Blackwell, M.J.; Lautner, E.A.; Marcus, L.C.; Meyer, T.E.; Monath, T.P.; Nave, J.E.; Ohle, J.; et al. Executive summary of the AVMA One Health Initiative Task Force report. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2008, 233, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Barrett, M.; Osofsky, S. One Health: Interdependence of People, Other Species, and the Plane. In Jekel’s Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health, 4th ed.; Katz, D., Elmore, J., Eds.; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 364–377. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zinsstag, J.; Schelling, E.; Waltner-Toews, D.; Tanner, M. From “one medicine” to “one health” and systemic approaches to health and well-being. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 101, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Harada, M. Minamata Disease: Methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1995, 25, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. The One Health Initiative. Available online: http://www.onehealthinitiative.com/about.php (accessed on 26 March 2015).
  24. Brinkman, H.-J.; de Pee, S.; Sanogo, I.; Subran, L.; Bloem, M.W. High food prices and the global financial crisis have reduced access to nutritious food and worsened nutritional status and health. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 153S–161S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Karanikolos, M.; Mladovsky, P.; Cylus, J.; Thomson, S.; Basu, S.; Stuckler, D.; Mackenbach, J.P.; McKee, M. Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet 2013, 381, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. World Health Organization; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Health Synthesis; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. Available online: http://www.who.int/globalchange/ecosystems/ecosys.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015).
  27. Van der Schalie, W.H.; Gardner, H.S., Jr.; Bantle, J.A.; de Rosa, C.T.; Finch, R.A.; Reif, J.S.; Reuter, R.H.; Backer, L.C.; Burger, J.; Folmar, L.C.; et al. Animals as sentinels of human health hazards of environmental chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jochimsen, E.M.; Carmichael, W.W.; An, J.S.; Cardo, D.M.; Cookson, S.T.; Holmes, C.E.M.; Antunes, M.B.D.C.; Filho, D.A.D.M.; Lyra, T.M.; Barreto, V.S.T.; et al. Liver failure and death after exposure to microcystins at a hemodialysis center in Brazil. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Soares, R.M.; Yuan, M.; Servaites, J.C.; Delgado, A.; Magalhães, V.F.; Hilborn, E.D.; Carmichael, W.W.; Azevedo, S.M.F.O. Sublethal exposure from microcystins to renal insufficiency patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Environ. Toxicol. 2006, 21, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pouria, S.; de Andrade, A.; Barbosa, J.; Cavalcanti, R.L.; Barreto, V.T.; Ward, C.J.; Preiser, W.; Poon, G.K.; Neild, G.H.; Codd, G.A. Fatal microcystin intoxication in haemodialysis unit in Caruaru, Brazil. Lancet 1998, 352, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hilborn, E.D.; Soares, R.M.; Servaites, J.C.; Delgado, A.G.; Magalhães, V.F.; Carmichael, W.W.; Azevedo, S.M. Sublethal microcystin exposure and biochemical outcomes among hemodialysis patients. PLoS One 2013, 8, e69518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Turner, P.C.; Gammie, A.J.; Hollinrake, K.; Codd, G.A. Pneumonia associated with contact with cyanobacteria. Br. Med. J. 1990, 300, 1440–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rapala, J.; Robertson, A.; Negri, A.P.; Berg, K.A.; Tuomi, P.; Lyra, C.; Erkomaa, K.; Lahti, K.; Hoppu, K.; Lepistö, L. First report of saxitoxin in Finnish lakes and possible associated effects on human health. Environ. Toxicol. 2005, 20, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stewart, I.; Webb, P.M.; Schluter, P.J.; Shaw, G.R. Recreational and occupational field exposure to freshwater cyanobacteria—A review of anecdotal and case reports, epidemiological studies and the challenges for epidemiologic assessment. Environ. Health 2006, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Giannuzzi, L.; Sedan, D.; Echenique, R.; Andrinolo, D. An acute case of intoxication with cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in recreational water in Salto Grande Dam, Argentina. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2164–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hilborn, E.D.; Roberts, V.A.; Backer, L.; Deconno, E.; Egan, J.S.; Hyde, J.B.; Nicholas, D.C.; Wiegert, E.J.; Billing, L.M.; Diorio, M.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; et al. Algal bloom-associated disease outbreaks among users of freshwater lakes—United States, 2009–2010. Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2014, 63, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  37. Heise, H.A. Symptoms of hay fever caused by algae. J. Allergy 1949, 20, 383–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cohen, S.G.; Reif, C.B. Cutaneous sensitization to blue-green algae. J. Allergy 1953, 24, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pilotto, L.S.; Douglas, R.M.; Burch, M.D.; Cameron, S.; Beers, M.; Rouch, G.J.; Robinson, P.; Kirk, M.; Cowie, C.T.; Hardiman, S.; et al. Health effects of exposure to cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) during recreational water activities. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Public Health 1977, 21, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Billings, W.H. Water-associated human illness in Northeastern Pennsylvania and its suspected association with blue-green algae blooms. In The Water Environment: Algal Toxins and Health Environmental Science Research; Carmichael, W., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 243–255. [Google Scholar]
  41. Soong, F.S.; Maynard, E.; Kirke, K.; Luke, C. Illness associated with blue-green algae. Med. J. Aust. 1992, 156, 67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Walker, S.R.; Lund, J.C.; Schumacher, D.G.; Brakhage, P.A.; McManus, B.C.; Miller, J.D.; Augustine, M.M.; Carney, J.J.; Holland, R.S.; Hoagland, K.D.; et al. Nebraska experience. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 619, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Lévesque, B.; Gervais, M.C.; Chevalier, P.; Gauvin, D.; Anassour-Laouan-Sidi, E.; Gingras, S.; Fortin, N.; Brisson, G.; Greer, C.; Bird, D. Prospective study of acute health effects in relation to exposure to cyanobacteria. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 466–467, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Falconer, I.R.; Beresford, A.M.; Runnegar, M.T. Evidence of liver damage by toxin from a bloom of the blue-green alga, Microcystis aeruginosa. Med. J. Aust. 1983, 1, 511–514. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Byth, S. Palm Island mystery disease. Med. J. Aust. 1980, 2, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Teixera, M.; Costa, M.; Carvalho, V.; Pereira, M.; Hage, E. Gastroenteritis epidemic in the area of the Itaparica Dam, Bahia, Brazil. Bull. PAHO 1993, 27, 244–253. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hawkins, P.R.; Runnegar, M.T.; Jackson, A.R.; Falconer, I.R. Severe hepatotoxicity caused by the tropical cyanobacterium (blue-green Alga) Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Woloszynska) seenaya and subba raju isolated from a domestic water supply reservoir. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 50, 1292–1295. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. El Saadi, O.; Esterman, A.J.; Cameron, S.; Roder, D.M. Murray River water, raised cyanobacterial cell counts, and gastrointestinal and dermatological symptoms. Med. J. Aust. 1995, 162, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Tisdale, E.S. Epidemic of intestinal disorders in Charleston, W. Va. occurring simultaneously with unprecedented water supply conditions. Am. J. Public Health 1931, 198–200. [Google Scholar]
  50. Veldee, M.V. Epidemiological study of suspected water-borne gastroenteritis. Am. J. Public Health 1931, 21, 1227–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lippy, E.C.; Erb, J. Gastrointestinal illness at Sewickley, Pa. J. Am. Water Work Assoc. 1976, 68, 606–610. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bourke, A.T.C.; Hawes, R.B.; Neilson, A.; Stallman, N.D. An outbreak of hepato-enteritis (the Palm Island mystery disease) possibly caused by algal intoxication. Toxicon 1983, 21 (Suppl. 3), 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Annadotter, H.; Cronberg, G.; Lawton, L.; Hansson, H.; Göthe, U.; Skulberg, O. An extensive outbreak of gastroenteritis associated with the toxic cyanobacterium Planktothrix agardhii (Oscillatoriales, Cyanophyceaea) in Scania, South Sweden. In Cyanotoxins: Occurrence, Causes, Consequences; Chorus, I., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001; pp. 200–208. [Google Scholar]
  54. World Health Organization; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 94, Ingested Nitrate and Nitrite, and Cyanobacterial Peptide Toxins; IARC: Lyon, France, 2010; pp. 360–362. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol94/mono94.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015).
  55. Zhou, L.; Yu, H.; Chen, K. Relationship between microcystin in drinking water and colorectal cancer. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2002, 15, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Westrick, J.A.; Szlag, D.C.; Southwell, B.J.; Sinclair, J. A review of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins removal/inactivation in drinking water treatment. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397, 1705–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Carmichael, W.W.; Gorham, P.R. Freshwater cyanophyte toxins: Types and their effects on the use of micro algae biomass. In Algae Biomass: Production and Use; Shelef, G., Soeder, C.J., Eds.; Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1980; pp. 437–448. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gilroy, D.J.; Kauffman, K.W.; Hall, R.A.; Huang, X.; Chu, F.S. Assessing Potential Health risks from microcystin toxins in blue-green algae dietary supplements. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Soares, R.M.; Magalhães, V.F.; Azevedo, S.M.F.O. Accumulation and depuration of microcystins (cyanobacteria hepatotoxins) in Tilapia rendalli (Cichlidae) under laboratory conditions. Aquat. Toxicol. 2004, 70, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Codd, G.A.; Metcalf, J.S.; Beattie, K.A. Retention of Microcystis aeruginosa and microcystin by salad lettuce (Lactuca sativa) after spray irrigation with water containing cyanobacteria. Toxicon 1999, 37, 1181–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, J.; Song, L.; Dai, J.; Gan, N.; Liu, Z. Effects of microcystins on the growth and the activity of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase of rape (Brassica napus L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). Toxicon 2004, 43, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Genitsaris, S.; Kormas, K.A.; Moustaka-Gouni, M. Airborne algae and cyanobacteria: Occurrence and related health effects. Front. Biosci. 2011, 3, 772–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Moestrup, Ø. Toxic blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) in 1833. Phycologia 1996, 35, 5. [Google Scholar]
  64. Schwimmer, M.; Schwimmer, D. Medical aspects of phycology. In Algae, Man, and the Environment, Proceedings of the Algae, Man, and the Environment; Syracuse, NY, USA, 18–30 June 1967, Jackson, D.F., Ed.; Syracuse University Press: Syracuse, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  65. Porter, E.M. Fourth biennial report of board of regents of university of Minnesota, supplementary I. In Investigation of Supposed Poisonous Vegetation in the Waters of Some of the Lakes of Minnesota; Department of Agriculture: Minneapolis, MN, United States, 1886; Volume 9, pp. 5–96. [Google Scholar]
  66. Steyn, D.G. Poisoning of animals and human beings by algae. S. Afr. J. Sci. 1945, 41, 243–244. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gunn, G.J.; Rafferty, A.G.; Rafferty, G.C.; Cockburn, N.; Edwards, C.; Beattie, K.A.; Codd, G.A. Fatal canine neurotoxicosis attributed to blue-green algae (cyanobacteria). Vet. Rec. 1992, 130, 301–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Matsunaga, H.; Harad, K.I.; Senma, M.; Ito, Y.; Yasuda, N.; Ushida, S.; Kimura, Y. Possible cause of unnatural mass death of wild birds in a pond in Nishinomiya, Japan: Sudden appearance of toxic cyanobacteria. Nat. Toxins 1999, 7, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chellappa, N.T.; Costa, M.A.M.; Marinho, I.D.R. Harmful cyanobacterial blooms from semiarid freshwater ecosystems of Northeast Brazil. Australia. Aust. Soc. Limnol. 2000, 38, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  70. Stewart, I.; Seawright, A.A.; Shaw, G.R. Cyanobacterial poisoning in livestock, wild mammals and birds—An overview. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 619, 613–637. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Gillam, W.G. The effect on livestock of water contaminated with freshwater algae. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1925, 780–784. [Google Scholar]
  72. May, V.; McBarron, E.J. Occurrence of the blue-green alga, Ansbaena circinuiis Rabenh., in New South Wales and toxicity to mice and honey bees. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 1973, 39, 264–266. [Google Scholar]
  73. Zimba, P.V.; Khoo, L.; Carmichael, W.W.; Gaunt, P. Confirmation of catfish mortalities resulting from microcystin produced during Microcystis blooms. J. Phycol. 2000, 36, 72–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jewel, M.A.S.; Affan, M.A.; Khan, S. Fish mortality due to a cyanobacterial bloom in an aquaculture pond in Bangladesh. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2003, 6, 1046–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Singh, S.; Asthana, R.K. Assessment of microcystin concentration in carp and catfish: A case study from Lakshmikund Pond, Varanasi, India. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 92, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Galey, F.D.; Beasley, V.R.; Carmichael, W.W.; Kleppe, G.; Hooser, S.B.; Haschek, W.M. Blue-green algae (Microcystis aeruginosa) hepatotoxicosis in dairy cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1987, 48, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. McLeod, J.A.; Bondar, G.F. A case of suspected algal poisoning in Manitoba. Can. J. Public Health 1952, 43, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Codd, G.A.; Bell, S.G. Eutrophication and toxic cyanobacteria in freshwaters. Water Pollut. Control 1985, 84, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  79. Beasley, V.R.; Cook, W.O.; Dahlem, A.M.; Lovell, R.A.; Valentine, W.M. Algae intoxications in livestock and waterfowl. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1989, 5, 345–361. [Google Scholar]
  80. Codd, G.A.; Edwards, C.; Beattie, K.A.; Barr, W.M.; Gunn, G.J. Fatal attraction to cyanobacteria? Nature 1992, 359, 110–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Backer, L.C.; Landsberg, J.H.; Miller, M.; Keel, K.; Taylor, T.K. Canine cyanotoxin poisonings in the United States (1920s–2012): Review of suspected and confirmed cases from three data sources. Toxins 2013, 5, 1597–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Corkill, N.; Smith, R.; Seckington, M.; Pontefract, R. Poisoning at Rutland Water. Vet. Rec. 1989, 125, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hamill, K.D. Toxicity in benthic freshwater cyanobacteria (blue-green algae): First observations in New Zealand. N. Zeal. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2001, 35, 1057–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Olsen, T.A. Toxic plankton. In Proceedings of the Inservice Training Course in Water Works Problems, the University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 15–16 February 1951; The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1951; pp. 86–95. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rose, E.T. Toxic algae in Iowa lakes. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 1953, 60, 738–745. [Google Scholar]
  86. Eriksson, J.; Meriluoto, J.; Lindholm, T. Can cyanobacterial peptide toxins accumulate in aquatic food chains? In Perspectives in Microbial Ecology, Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Microbial Ecology; Ljubljana, Slovenia, 24–29 August 1986, Megusar, F., Gantar, M., Eds.; Slovene Society for Microbiology: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1986; pp. 655–658. [Google Scholar]
  87. Skulberg, O.M.; Codd, G.A.; Carmichael, W.W. Toxic blue-green algal blooms in Europe: A growing problem. Ambio 1984, 13, 244–247. [Google Scholar]
  88. Mancini, M.; Rodriguez, C.; Bagnis, G.; Liendo, A.; Prosperi, C.; Bonansea, M.; Tundisi, J.G. Cianobacterial bloom and animal mass mortality in a reservoir from Central Argentina. Braz. J. Biol. 2010, 70, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bossenmaier, E.F.; Olson, T.A.; Rueger, M.E.; Marshall, W.H. Some field and laboratory aspects of duck sickness at Whitewater Lake, Manitoba. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 1954, 19, p. 163. Available online: http://www.speciation.net/Database/Journals/Transactions-of-the-North-American-Wildlife-and-Natural-Resources-Conference-;i3358 (accessed on 16 April 2015).
  90. Keymer, I.F.; Smith, G.R.; Roberts, T.A.; Heaney, S.I.; Hibberd, D.J. Botulism as a factor in waterfowl mortality at St. James’s Park. Vet. Rec. 1972, 90, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Murphy, T.; Lawson, A.; Nalewajko, C.; Murkin, H.; Ross, L.; Oguma, K.; McIntyre, T. Algal toxins—Initiators of avian botulism? Environ. Toxicol. 1999, 15, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Codd, G.A.; Steffensen, D.A.; Burch, M.D.; Baker, P.D. Toxic blooms of cyanobacteria in Lake Alexandrina: Learning from history. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1994, 45, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dillenberg, H.O.; Dehnel, M.K. Toxic waterbloom in Saskatchewan, 1959. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1960, 83, 1151–1154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Senior, V.E. Algal poisoning in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1960, 24, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Juday, R.E.; Keller, E.J.; Horpestad, A.; Bahls, L.L.; Glasser, S. A toxic bloom of Anabaena Flos-Aquae in Hebgen Reservoir Montana in 1977. In The Water Environment: Algal Toxins and Health; Carmichael, W.W., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  96. Spoerke, D.G.; Rumack, B.H. Blue-green algae poisoning. J. Emerg. Med. 1985, 2, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Pybus, M.J.; Hobson, D.P.; Onderka, D.K. Mass mortality of bats due to probable blue-green algal toxicity. J. Wildl. Dis. 1986, 449–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Vasconcelos, V.M. Toxic cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) in Portuguese fresh waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1994, 130, 439–451. [Google Scholar]
  99. Codd, G.A.; Beattie, K.A. Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) and their toxins: Awareness and action in the United Kingdom. PHLS Microbiol. Dig. 1991, 8, 82–86. [Google Scholar]
  100. Harding, W.R.; Rowe, N.; Wessels, J.C.; Beattie, K.A.; Codd, G.A. Suspected toxicosis of a dog attributed to the cyanobacterial (blue-green algal) hepatotoxin nodularin in South Africa. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 1995, 66, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Van Halderen, A.; Harding, W.R.; Wessels, J.C.; Schneider, D.J.; Heine, E.W.P.; van der Merwe, J.; Fourie, J.M. Cyanobacterial (blue-green algae) poisoning of livestock in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 1995, 66, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Pollux, B.J.A.; Pollux, P.M.J. Vis- En Vogelsterfte Door Blauwalgen in de Romeinenweerd. Natuurhistorisch Maandblad 2004, 93, 207–210. [Google Scholar]
  103. Devlin, J.P.; Edwards, O.E.; Gorham, P.R.; Hunter, N.R.; Pike, R.K.; Stavric, B. Anatoxin-a, a toxic alkaloid from Anabaena flos-aquae NRC 44-l. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 1367–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mahmood, N.A.; Carmichael, W.W.; Pfahler, D. Anticholinesterase poisonings in dogs from a cyanobacterial (blue-green algae) bloom dominated by Anabaena flosaquae. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1988, 49, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Matsunaga, H.; Moore, R.E.; Niemczura, W.P.; Carmichael, W.W. Anatoxin-a(s), a potent anthicholinesterase from Anabaena flos-aquae. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8021–8023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. James, K.J.; Sherlock, I.R.; Stack, M.A. Anatoxin-a in Irish freshwater and cyanobacteria, using a new fluorimetric liquid chromatographic method. Toxicon 1997, 35, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Edwards, C.; Beattie, K.A.; Scrimgeour, C.M.; Codd, G.A. Identification of anatoxin-A in benthic cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) and in associated dog poisonings at Loch Insh, Scotland. Toxicon 1992, 10, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gugger, M.; Lenoir, S.; Berger, C.; Ledreux, A.; Druart, J.C.; Humbert, J.F.; Guette, C.; Bernard, C. First report in a river in France of the benthic cyanobacterium Phormidium favosum producing anatoxin-a associated with dog neurotoxicosis. Toxicon 2005, 45, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Mez, K.; Beattie, K.A.; Codd, G.A.; Hanselmann, K.; Hauser, B.; Naegeli, H.; Preisig, H.R. Identification of a microcystin in benthic cyanobacteria linked to cattle deaths on alpine pastures in Switzerland. Eur. J. Phycol. 1997, 32, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Auf Der Heide, E. Inter-agency Communications. Disaster Response: Principles for Preparation and Coordination. Chapter 5. 1989. Available online: ftp://mediccom.org/DISASTER/DR.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015).
  111. Kahn, L.H.; Kaplan, B.; Steele, J.H. Confronting zoonoses through closer collaboration between medicine and veterinary medicine (as “one medicine”). Vet. Ital. 2007, 43, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  112. Beasley, V. “‘One Toxicology,’ ‘Ecosystem Health,’ and ‘One Health’”. Vet. Ital. 2009, 45, 97–110. [Google Scholar]
  113. Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Blue-green algae working group. Cyanobacteria (Blue-Green Algae) in Inland and Inshore Waters: Assessment and Minimisation of Risks to Public Health. 2012. Available online: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/resource/0039/00391470.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015). [Google Scholar]
  114. SAGIR, surveiller les maladies de la faune sauvage pour agir. Available online: http://www.oncfs.gouv.fr/Reseau-SAGIR-ru105 (accessed on 26 March 2015).
  115. Roberts, V. Building Health Surveillance Capacity for illnesses and Outbreaks Associated with Harmful Algal Blooms. Available online: http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-12/documents/habs-roberts-12-10-14.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015).
  116. Carmichael, W.W.; Gorham, P.R. The mosaic nature of toxic blooms of cyanobacteria. In The Water Environment, Algal Toxins and Health. Environmental Science Research; Carmichael, W.W., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 161–172. [Google Scholar]
  117. Namikoshi, M.; Rinehart, K.L.; Sakai, R.; Stotts, R.R.; Dahlem, A.M.; Beasley, V.R.; Carmichael, W.W.; Evans, W.R. Identification of 12 hepatotoxins from a Homer Lake bloom of the cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa, Microcystis viridis, and Microcystis wesenbergii: Nine new microcystins. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Beasley, V.R.; Dahlem, A.M.; Cook, W.O.; Valentine, W.M.; Lovell, R.A.; Hooser, S.B.; Harada, K.; Suzuki, M.; Carmichael, W.W. Diagnostic and clinically important aspects of cyanobacterial (blue-green algae) toxicoses. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 1989, 1, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chen, J.; Zhang, D.W.; Xie, P.; Wang, Q.; Ma, Z.M. Simultaneous determination of microcystin contaminations in various vertebrates (fish, turtle, duck and water bird) from a large eutrophic Chinese lake, Lake Taihu, with toxic Microcystis blooms. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 3317–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Chen, J.; Xie, P.; Zhang, D.W.; Ke, Z.X.; Yang, H. In situ studies on the bioaccumulation of microcystins in the phytoplanktivorous silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) stocked in Lake Taihu with dense toxic Microcystis blooms. Aquaculture 2006, 261, 1026–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cook, W.O.; Beasley, V.R.; Dahlem, A.M.; Lovell, R.A.; Hooser, S.B.; Mahmood, N.B.; Carmichael, W.W. Consistent inhibition of peripheral cholinesterases by neurotoxins from the freshwater cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae: Studies of ducks, swine, mice, and a steer. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1989, 8, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Alonso-Andicoberry, C.; Garcia-Villada, L.; Lopez-Rodas, V.; Costas, E. Catastrophic mortality of flamingos in a Spanish national park caused by cyanobacteria. Vet. Rec. 2002, 151, 706–707. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  123. Mateos-Sanz, M.A.; Carrera, D.; López-Rodas, V.; Costas, E. Toxic cyanobacteria and wildlife conservation. Acta Bot. Malacit. 2009, 34, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  124. Wilde, S.B.; Murphy, T.M.; Hope, C.P.; Habrun, S.K.; Kempton, J.; Birrenkott, A.; Wiley, F.; Bowerman, W.W.; Lewitus, A.J. Avian vacuolar myelinopathy linked to exotic aquatic plants and a novel cyanobacterial species. Environ. Toxicol. 2005, 20, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Holtcamp, W. The Emerging Science of BMAA: Do Cyanobacteria Contribute to Neurodegenerative Disease? Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, a110–a116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hilborn, E.D.; Beasley, V.R. One Health and Cyanobacteria in Freshwater Systems: Animal Illnesses and Deaths Are Sentinel Events for Human Health Risks. Toxins 2015, 7, 1374-1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7041374

AMA Style

Hilborn ED, Beasley VR. One Health and Cyanobacteria in Freshwater Systems: Animal Illnesses and Deaths Are Sentinel Events for Human Health Risks. Toxins. 2015; 7(4):1374-1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7041374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hilborn, Elizabeth D., and Val R. Beasley. 2015. "One Health and Cyanobacteria in Freshwater Systems: Animal Illnesses and Deaths Are Sentinel Events for Human Health Risks" Toxins 7, no. 4: 1374-1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7041374

APA Style

Hilborn, E. D., & Beasley, V. R. (2015). One Health and Cyanobacteria in Freshwater Systems: Animal Illnesses and Deaths Are Sentinel Events for Human Health Risks. Toxins, 7(4), 1374-1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7041374

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop