MicroRNAs and Metastasis

Abstract

Metastasis, the development of secondary malignant growths at a distance from the primary site of a cancer, is associated with almost 90% of all cancer deaths, and half of all cancer patients present with some form of metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Consequently, there is a clear clinical need for a better understanding of metastasis. The role of miRNAs in the metastatic process is beginning to be explored. However, much is still to be understood. In this review, we present the accumulating evidence for the importance of miRNAs in metastasis as key regulators of this hallmark of cancer.

1. Introduction

Nearly half of all patients with cancer present with some form of metastasis at time of diagnosis [1]. Unfortunately, with very few exceptions, metastatic disease remains essentially incurable and almost 90% of all cancer deaths are associated with metastasis [2,3]. Consequently, there is a clear clinical need for a better understanding of metastasis and the development of novel therapeutics targeting this process.

In essence, metastasis, the development of secondary malignant growths at a distance from the primary site of a cancer, is a multiphase process that requires tumor cells to detach from the primary tumor mass, enter and travel through the blood or lymph system, to leave circulation, and to form a new tumor in other organs or tissues of the body. The process of metastasis is very inefficient, with the survival rate of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) being as low as 0.2%, and then only those survivors can successfully metastasize target organs only when optimal conditions occur [4].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (19–25 nt) non-coding single-stranded RNAs that regulate gene expression through imperfect binding to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of target genes [5] (Figure 1). Because a single miRNA can target several hundred genes, and a single target gene often contains multiple miRNA binding sites, it is believed that more than 60% of all human genes are a direct target for miRNA regulation [6]. Consequently, miRNAs have been shown to play key regulatory roles in virtually every aspect of biology including both physiological and pathological processes, most notably in cancer. The importance of miRNAs in controlling cancer development and progression is well established [7]. In this review, we will consider the identity and role of miRNAs in the metastatic process.

The first reports associating miRNAs with metastasis came in 2007, with the demonstration that miR-10b was induced by Twist1 binding and could promote metastasis in breast cancer in vitro and in vivo through targeting of Homeobox D10 (HOXD10) [13]. In the same year, also in breast cancer, let-7 was identified as a suppressor of metastasis acting to target the GTPase H-RAS and High Mobility Group AT-Hook 2 (HMGA2) gene in tumor-initiating cells, resulting in reduced proliferation and mammosphere formation in vitro and decreased metastasis in a NOD/SCID murine model [14]. In subsequent studies, breast cancer has remained the main focus of research investigating miRNAs in metastasis, and many studies have shown that miRNAs can act as both promoters or inhibitors of metastasis in cancer and modulate many steps of the metastatic pathway, including migration, invasion, adhesion, the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), niche conditioning and proliferation in secondary site (Table 1) [15,16].

2. Metastasis—Promoting miRNAs

In common with miR-10b, many of the metastasis-promoting miRNAs that have been characterized have been identified in breast cancer. For example, miR-105 has been identified as being up-regulated in tumor cells and exosomes derived from breast cancer cells were demonstrated to breakdown vascular endothelial barriers and induce vascular permeability, thereby promoting metastasis by targeting of ZO-1, a component of cell–cell adhesion complexes in endothelial and epithelial cells [17]. Furthermore, these authors used exosomes to reduce tight junction formation in endothelial monolayers and induce vascular permeability and metastasis in vivo. MiR-181b-3p was demonstrated to promote EMT in vitro, with its inhibition reducing the expression of mesenchymal markers, migration and invasion in highly metastatic cell lines [18]. YWHAG was identified as a direct target of miR-181b-3p, which in turn led to protein stabilization of the EMT regulator, Snail. The expression of miR-374a was found to be up-regulated in patients with distant metastases and poor prognostic outcome. MiR-374a A was also demonstrated to promote EMT and metastasis in vitro and in vivo by activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by targeting WIF1, PTEN, and WNT5A which inhibit this cascade [19]. Similarly, miR-135a is also highly expressed in metastatic breast cancer and has been demonstrated to promote migration and invasion mediated by targeting HOXA10 and APC [20,21]. The same miRNA is up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and was found to promote migration and invasion through targeting of FOXO1 [22]. MiR-96 is also highly expressed in metastatic breast cancer and was demonstrated to promote cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro and enhanced tumor growth in vivo via targeting of PTPN9 [23]. This miRNA was also observed to be highly expressed in HCC tissue, where it was demonstrated to increase proliferation and migration in vitro through inhibition of ephrinA5 expression [23]. The hypoxia-induced miRNA, miR-210, was found to be up-regulated in breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) and the expression of this miRNA was shown to promote migration and invasion of these cells mediated by direct targeting of E-Cadherin and its transcription repressor, Snail [24]. BCSCs were also shown to express high levels of miR-29a, which increased levels of migration, invasion and EMT through targeting of the methyltransferase SUV420H2 [25]. Further, in breast cancer, miR-130 was found to target FOSL1 and suppress the inhibition of ZO-1, thereby promoting cell migration and invasion [26]. Both miR-8084 and miR-1204 were found to enhance migration and invasion through EMT induction via targeting of ING2 and VDR respectively [27,28].

Outside of breast cancer, several other miRNAs have been described to promote EMT. For example, miR-93 was demonstrated to target FOXA1 in endometrial carcinoma [29] and miR-197, highly up-regulated in metastatic HCC, was found to target NKD1 and DKK2, leading to inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling [30]. In gastric cancer (GC), TGF-β was shown to up-regulate miR-577 expression, which in turn targets SDPR, leading to EMT induction [31]; and miR-520c, which was up-regulated in both cell lines and tissues and shown to increase proliferation, migration and invasion of cancer cells through IRF2 targeting [32]. Similarly, in colorectal cancer (CRC), miR-1269a has been found to enhance TGF-β signaling through targeting of Smad7 and HOXD10 [33].

Esophageal carcinomas have been observed to over-express both miR-20b and miR-9, which were demonstrated to promote tumorigenic processes including metastasis [34,35]. In particular, the over-expression of miR-20b was shown to promote migration and invasion in vitro by targeting and regulation of PTEN [34]. In contrast, miR-9 was shown to stimulate metastasis through promotion of cell migration and induction of the EMT pathway by inhibiting E-Cadherin expression which in turn was demonstrated to induce c-myc and CD44 expression [35]. In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) miR-574-5p was found to promote metastasis in vitro and in vivo through targeting of TPRU [36]. In ovarian cancer, miR-194 was demonstrated to increase the growth, migration, and invasion of cells in vitro through targeting of the PTPN12 gene [37].

3. Metastasis—Suppressing miRNAs

In addition to miRNAs that promote metastasis, other miRNAs negatively regulate this process and are consequently found to be down-regulated in cancer tissues and/or cell lines. For example, members of the miR-200 family (i.e., miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-141 and miR-429) as well as miR-205 have been shown to inhibit the expression of transcription repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2 to enhance E-Cadherin expression, thereby inhibiting EMT in breast cancer [38,39,40]. In a study that looked at miRNA expression in 59 of the NCI60 cell lines that had a E-Cadherin high and vimentin low (EMT inhibitory) phenotype, they observed a strong negative correlation with miR-200 expression, suggesting that this miRNA is a universal regulator of metastasis in many cancer types including lung, kidney, colon and ovarian cancer [41]. Specifically, miR-200b was shown to be down-regulated in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) as a result of the recruitment of DNMT3A by MYC, which in turn binds to the miR-200b promoter region, resulting in promoter methylation and silencing, thereby inhibiting migration, invasion and mammosphere formation in TNBC cells [42]. Part of the miR-200 family, miR-141 is also down-regulated in prostate cancer (PC), and its ectopic expression was shown to inhibit invasion and metastasis and to convey a strong epithelial phenotype with a partial mesenchymal phenotype [43].

Similar to the miR-200 family, the miR-29 family (miR-29a/b/c) is another group of negative regulators of metastasis. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), these miRNAs were found to inhibit migration and invasion through targeting of the focal adhesion laminin–integrin pathway (LAMC2, ITGA6 and LOXL2) [44,45]. LOXL2 is an enzyme that facilitates metastasis by changing cell morphology and is also regulated by the miR-29 family in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) [46]. LOXL2 is also regulated by miR-26a/b and miR-218 in HNSCC [45], and by miR-504 in NSCLC [47]. Moreover, one member of the miR-29 family, miR-29c, has been found to be down-regulated in metastatic lung cancer and to reduce adhesion, invasion, migration and metastasis in vitro and in vivo through targeting integrin β1 and metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), which is involved in extracellular matrix breakdown [48].

miR-203 has also been found to act as a negative regulator of metastasis in several different cancers. In HNSCC, it was shown to inhibit factors involved in cytoskeletal (LASP1), extracellular matrix (SPARC) and metabolic genes (NUAK1) [49]. In breast cancer, miR-203 regulates EMT via a double-negative feedback loop formed by targeting TGF-β and Slug [50]. In melanoma, low levels of miR-203 were associated with poorer overall survival in metastatic patients and its expression in vivo was demonstrated to inhibit metastasis via regulation of Slug [51]. In ovarian cancer cell lines, miR-203 was also found to be down-regulated and was shown to inhibit the EMT pathway by targeting BIRC5 and, thereby, attenuating TGFβ activity [52]. In gastric cancer, miR-203 has been demonstrated to inhibit invasion and EMT through targeting of Annexin A4 [53]. In CRC, miR-203 expression was linked with clinical stage, lymph node metastasis and poor survival and was demonstrated to regulate cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting EIF5A2 expression [54].

Similarly, miR-124 has also been shown to be down-regulated in metastatic CRC when compared with healthy individuals and non-metastatic CRC patients [55]. This miRNA was found to regulate cell proliferation and invasive properties in cell lines through targeting of ROCK1 expression. miR-135a is another down-regulated miRNA that was shown to target ROCK1, thereby inhibiting EMT, invasion and migration of GC cell lines [56]. This miRNA was also observed to be down-regulated in GC patients and its expression was associated with more advance-stage disease and higher rate of lymph node metastases [56]. ROCK1 expression has also been described to be modulated by miR-381 in breast cancer, which also regulates other molecules of the Wnt signaling pathway [57].

Several miRNAs have been described as metastasis suppressors in breast cancer such as miR-7, which was found to regulate FAK and its levels were positively correlated with E-Cadherin expression and negatively correlated with Vimentin and Fibronectin expression [58]. Loss of miR-31 was associated with invasion and metastasis in breast cancer by regulating genes involved in invasion and metastasis including multiple α subunit partners of β1 and β3 integrins and WAVE3, [59,60]. MiR-154 is also down-regulated in breast cancer tissues and cell lines where it was shown to inhibit proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting E2F5 [61]. In TNBC, miR-150 was found to be down-regulated in tumor tissues, and to regulate HMGA2, leading to suppression of migration in vitro [62]. In breast cancer, miR-124 was observed to be significantly down-regulated in metastatic bone tissues [63]. Recently, nanoparticle delivery of miR-708, another inhibitor of metastasis, was shown to reduce lung metastasis in breast cancer in vivo [64]. In another study, miR-33b expression was shown to be inversely correlated with the presence of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients and to inhibit stemness, migration and invasion potential in vitro by targeting HMGA2, SALL4 and Twist1 [65]. Similarly, miR-34c was demonstrated to regulate migration and invasion of tumor cells in vitro through targeting of GIT1 [66], a protein whose expression has been linked to the presence of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients [67].

MiR-34c and other family members (i.e., miR-34a/b/c) have been shown to be induced by activation of p53 and to target Snail, Slug, CD44 and ZEB1 [68]. ZEB1 and ZEB2, and E-Cadherin inhibitors have been demonstrated to be negatively regulated by several miRNAs, including miR-101 in ovarian carcinoma [69], miR-139-5p in glioblastoma multiforme [70], miR-215 in NSCLC [71] and miR-132 in CRC and NSCLC [72,73].

In addition to direct regulation of metastasis by specific miRNAs, indirect regulation of metastasis can occur by regulation of components of the miRNA biosynthetic machinery. Two of these components, namely Dicer and Drosha, have been shown to be down-regulated in many cancer types [74,75]. It has been found that hypoxia can down-regulate Dicer expression through epigenetic silencing mediated by oxygen-sensitive H3K27me3 demethylases KDM6A and KDM6AB [76]. The authors demonstrated that this global reduction in miRNA expression resulted in down-regulation of miR-200 which in turn increased levels of ZEB1 regulating metastasis. It has been noted that Dicer is down-regulated in metastatic human tumors deficient in TAp63, which can bind to the Dicer promoter and activates its expression. Deletion of TAp63 in mice reduced Dicer levels in tumors and increased the frequency of metastases [77]. Similarly, another important component of the miRNA biogenesis pathway, AGO2, has been found to be phosphorylated under hypoxic conditions by EGFR in breast cancer cells where it was shown to mediate EGFR-associated tumor cell invasiveness [78].

MiRNAs themselves can also directly target biosynthetic components—such is the case for miR-103, miR-107 and miR-630. Hypoxia was shown to up-regulate miR-630 expression, leading to targeting of Dicer [79]. Using an orthotopic murine model of ovarian cancer, the authors demonstrated that delivery of miR-630 resulted in increased tumor growth and metastasis, along with decreased Dicer expression. In breast cancer, high levels of miR-103/107 were associated with the presence of metastasis and poor clinical outcome and were demonstrated to directly target Dicer as well as increase the migratory properties of cells in vitro and metastasis in vivo [80].

In addition to whole tumors, several studies have looked specifically at the role of miRNAs in cancer stem cells (CSCs) [81,82] which play key roles in metastasis and resistance to therapies [83,84,85,86]. For example, breast CSCs were found to express lower levels of miR-7 and higher levels of KLF4, an essential gene for induced pluripotent stem cells, and the expression of this miRNA was shown to down-regulate metastasis in vitro and in vivo [87,88]. Further identified as being down-regulated in breast CSCs, miR-4319 was shown to inhibit tumor initiation and metastasis in vivo by targeting E2F2 [89]. In contrast, miR-31 and miR-29a have been found to be up-regulated in breast CSCs, and inhibition of these miRNAs reduced the number and tumor-initiating ability of CSCs along with their metastatic ability 25 [90]. In prostate CSCs, miR-34a was found to be down-regulated and restoration of levels of this miRNA inhibited self-renewal capabilities and metastasis through targeting of CD44 [91]. In another study, the ectopic expression of down-regulated miR-141 in prostate CSCs were demonstrated to inhibit EMT, spheroid formation, invasion and metastatic capabilities via targeting multiple pro-metastatic genes, such as EZH2, CD44 and Rho GTPases [43]. In gastric CSCs, up-regulation of miR-106b was shown to enhance self-renewal, invasion and EMT, through activation of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway [92].

4. Metastasis and Circulating miRNAs

Unlike other RNA types—the vast majority of which are degraded by high levels of RNases found in the blood [93]—miRNAs are stable in the blood and are surprisingly resistant to fragmentation by either chemical or enzymatic agents [94]. Consequently, there has been a great deal of interest in circulating miRNAs in recent years [95]. Although the majority of studies relate to the biomarker potential of circulating miRNAs, they have also been demonstrated to act functionally with the ability to regulate spatially separated cells, a characteristic that lends itself to metastatic regulation [96,97,98]. Indeed, it has been described that cancer cells interact with other cells in the metastatic site to promote their own survival [99,100,101]. MiRNAs can exist in a circulating form either cell-free bound to proteins such as Argonaute2 (Ago2) [102,103], to lipids such as HDLs or LDLs [104], or they can be present inside extracellular vesicles such as exosomes [105,106]. They can act in an autocrine, paracrine and endocrine manner [96]. Several studies have reported higher levels of circulating miRNAs in metastatic patients. For example, miR-141 levels in serum from prostate cancer patients [94], and levels of miR-200c and miR-141 in breast cancer patients [107].

Circulating miRNAs have also been found to be present in tumor-secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs), mostly exosomes, which are known to participate in the metastatic process (Figure 2) [108,109,110]. For example, miR-25-3p, present in exosomes derived from CRC cells, were demonstrated to enter surrounding epithelial cells and to promote liver and lung metastasis in vivo [111]. The exosome-delivered miR-25-3p was shown disrupt the integrity of junctions in epithelial cells and to induce angiogenesis. Furthermore, this effect was mediated through targeting of KLF2, an inhibitor of VEGFR2, thereby decreasing the integrity of the endothelial barrier and targeting related molecule KLF4, leading to the decreased expression of Occludin, Claudin5 and ZO-1—all molecules implicated in maintenance of the cell–cell junction. Similarly, in breast cancer, miR-105 present in exosomes was demonstrated to target ZO-1, resulting in destruction of vascular structures and enhancing vascular permeability [17]. The authors demonstrated that in vivo exosomal miR-105 resulted in increased lung and brain metastasis. Furthermore, they observed that serum levels of miR-105 were higher in patients with distant or lymph node metastasis. In another study, miR-181c derived from brain metastasis breast cancer cells could induce abnormal localization of claudin-5, Occludin, ZO-1, N-Cadherin and Actin through transfer of miR-181c into blood–brain barrier endothelial cells, resulting in destruction of cell–cell contact [112]. Similarly, levels of exosome-associated miR-181c from breast cancer patient serum were also observed to be significantly higher in patients that suffered brain metastasis. In HCC, when exosomal miR-103a-3p was delivered into endothelial cells, the miRNA was shown to abrogate junction integrity and promoted tumor metastasis through targeting of VE-Cad, p120 and ZO-1 [113]. Again, levels of miR-103a-3p in serum from HCC patients were associated with higher metastasis potential, higher TNM and higher recurrent risk.

MiRNAs contained in exosomes have also been shown to influence non-tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) that promote invasion and metastasis in cancer. For example, pancreatic cancer cells under hypoxic conditions were shown to release exosomes that contained miR-301a-3p, which was demonstrated to induce TAM polarization resulting in increased pancreatic cell migration and EMT in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo [114]. This polarization was induced by activation of the PTEN/PI3Kγ signaling pathway. In contrast, TAMs themselves have also been shown to secrete exosomes containing functional miRNAs that can promote metastasis. For example, exosomal miR-223 derived from TAMs of breast cancer patients were demonstrated to promote tumor cell invasion through targeting of the Mef2c-β-catenin pathway [115,116]. In colon cancer, activated TAMs were shown to release exosomes containing miR-21-5p and miR-155-5p, which were demonstrated to regulate migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells through targeting of BRG1 [116]. In addition to TAMs, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which initiate remodeling of the extracellular matrix, thereby facilitating metastasis, can also release and respond to miRNA-containing exosomes [117]. This is the case for example in prostate cancer, where EV-associated miR-409 was demonstrated to promote EMT both in vitro and in vivo through down-regulation of RSU1 and STAG2 [118]. In breast cancer, tumor cells were demonstrated to secrete exosomes containing miR-122 that could induce glucose reallocation in pre-metastatic sites in fibroblast and astrocyte populations, thereby making sites more conducive to metastasizing cancer cells [119]. In liver cancer, tumor-derived exosomal miR-1247-3p was shown to promote the activation of fibroblasts to form CAFs through the down-regulation of B4GALT3, leading to activation of the β1-integrin-NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby promoting stemness, EMT, spheroid formation, mobility and chemoresistance in vitro and increasing lung metastasis in vivo [120]. Moreover, higher levels of miR-1247-3p were detected in serum from liver cancer patients with lung metastases [120].

Other tumor microenvironment cells have also been shown to be able to communicate with tumor cells as a result of exosome-associated miRNAs. For example, astrocytes in breast cancer patients were found to release exosomes containing miR-19a which was demonstrated to regulate PTEN in tumor cells and to promote brain metastasis after tumor extravasation [121]. In oral cancer, highly metastatic tumor cells were demonstrated to release exosomes containing miR-342-3p and miR-1246, which could be taken up by less metastatic tumor cells, resulting in an increase in their mobility and invasiveness through regulation of DENND2D [122].

5. The Metastatic Targetome

As shown above, many miRNAs have now been identified that are associated with the regulation of cancer metastasis. However, the functional significance of such deregulation is poorly understood, as the target genes (the targetome) of miRNAs are notoriously difficult to predict computationally, and moreover differ according to the cellular context [123,124]. An alternative approach is to directly sample the targetome in situ using cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) techniques coupled with high-throughput sequencing. This technology has evolved through the development of several variations, with arguably the most promising being Photoactivatable-Ribonucleoside-Enhanced CLIP (PAR-CLIP), which has a far better signal-to-noise ratio than other CLIP-based technologies [125]. For example, miR-200, a major regulator of cellular migration and invasion, was demonstrated to target WIPF1, CFL2 and MPRIP by HITS-CLIP in breast cancer—all genes which promote invadopodia and invasion of cells [126]. In addition, PAR-CLIP was used with prostate cancer cells to show that miR-148a reduced migration and invasion by direct interaction with CENPF 3′UTR [127]. Similarly, miR-141 was shown to mediate cell invasion by directly targeting RAC1, CDC42, and i [43]. Targets of miR-346 were also identified by CLIP including the oncogene YWHAZ that modulates cell invasion and levels were correlated with Gleason grade, biochemical recurrence, non-organ-confined disease and lymph node metastases in patients [128].

6. Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

As is clear from the evidence presented above (Table 1), many miRNAs play crucial roles in cancer metastasis and, as a result, the therapeutic targeting of these miRNAs has generated a lot of interest in recent years [129,130,131,132,133,134,135]. In general terms, there are two strategies to modulate miRNA expression—either the restoration of down-regulated tumor suppressor miRNAs, or the inhibition of pro-metastatic miRNAs. The former group, requiring the expression of a specific miRNA using techniques such as direct delivery, viral or other vector formats, is much less challenging from a practical point of view than the inhibition of a specific miRNA whose over-expression could be very localized to a few cells or may require complete inhibition to be effective. The latter approach is generally achieved using some type of specific inhibitor such as antagomiRs or miRNA sponges [136,137]. All of these approaches, whether expression or inhibition, face common challenges including poor delivery, low cellular efficiency, endosomal escape and off-target effects, amongst others. Perhaps most attention has been focused on improving delivery systems for miRNAs and/or miRNA inhibitors. Two general approaches have been taken to deliver miRNAs in vivo; viral vectors and non-viral delivery systems. Viral vectors such as lentivirus, adenovirus or adeno-associated viruses [138,139] have been demonstrated to be able to deliver miRNAs with high efficiency in vivo. However, these vectors can trigger an immune response in patients [140]. Consequently, many studies have chosen to use non-viral vectors, in particular nanoparticles such as lipid and polymeric nanoparticles that can protect miRNA from degradation in vivo and, thereby, increase their half-life in circulation but do, however, have much lower transfection efficiencies than viral vectors [141,142,143,144]. For example, lipid-derived nanoparticles carrying miR-34a were demonstrated to reduce metastasis and increase survival in an orthotopic model of prostate cancer [91]. Lipid nanoparticles were also used for the systemic delivery of miR-200 to reduce angiogenesis and metastasis in murine models of ovarian, lung, renal and breast cancer, through regulation of Interleukin 8 and CXCL1 [145]. In NSCLC, cationic liposomes were used to deliver miR-143 in mice and were demonstrated to inhibit metastasis and prolong survival [146]. CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been used as an alternative to inhibitor sequences in several cancer types [147,148,149]. For example, lentivirus-mediated disruption of miR-21 by CRISPR-Cas9 technology was shown to inhibit EMT in ovarian cancer [150], and, in glioblastoma, lentivirus-mediated miR-10b CRISPR/Cas9 inhibition was found to be lethal for GMB cells and GBM-initiating stem cells both in vitro and in orthotopic mice [151]. In addition to addressing the problem of general delivery, several approaches have been made to improve specific delivery by targeting technologies. For example, let-7g was conjugated with an aptamer that binds and antagonizes the oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase Axl (GL21.T) in lung cell line (A549—Axl+) and breast cancer cell line (MCF7—Axl−) [152]. These constructs were shown to retain cell and tissue specificity in vivo and produce a reduction of tumor volume. Specific cell-targeted aptamers have also been used including delivery of anti-miR-155 using poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles and a peptide with a low pH-induced transmembrane structure (pHLIP) that facilitated the delivery of the inhibitor across the plasma membrane under acidic conditions, such as those found within tumors [153]. This strategy was used in a mouse lymphoma model that led to a reduction of tumor growth without any discernable toxicity. Disulfide-cross-linked polyethylenimine (PEI-SS) was employed along with conjugated folic acid to target in breast cancer [143]. EVs themselves have been used as a vehicle delivery system for metastatic miRNAs. For example, EVs produced by B-cells that contained a miR-335 synthetic mimic were demonstrated to inhibit SOX4 expression and to reduce tumor growth in vivo in a breast cancer model [154].

In addition to direct modulation of metastasis-associated miRNAs, these delivery systems have also been used to modulate treatment response in a metastatic context. For example, liposomal nanoparticle delivery of anti-miR-155 was used to reverse cisplatin chemoresistance in a murine lung cancer model of metastasis resulting in reduced proliferation and angiogenesis [155]. In glioblastoma, antagomirs directed against miR-21 and miR-10b were incorporated within nanoparticles (cRGD-tagged PEG-PGLA) and shown to have high levels of uptake by cells and to increase chemosensitivity to Temozolomide in vivo [156]. The same antagomirs were also used for TNBC [157]. Liposomal nanoparticles loaded with miR-200c were demonstrated to sensitize metastatic lung cancer cells to radiotherapy in vivo [158]. In addition, multiple studies have been used combining miRNA modulators (mimics or anti-miRNAs) along with chemotherapy—most commonly, doxorubicin with miRNAs such as let-7a and miR-21 in breast cancer [159,160], miR-31 in cervical cancer [161] and miR-34a in prostate cancer [162]. Co-polymer nano-assemblies (PEG5K-VE4-DET20) were co-loaded with let-7b mimic and paclitaxel in NSCLC and demonstrated to potentiate the cytotoxicity of paclitaxel and induced apoptosis and inhibition of invasiveness in vivo [163]. Researchers developed a polymeric dual delivery nanoscale device (DDND) to delivery miR-345 mimic and gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer [164]. This system was used to reduce tumor growth and decrease metastasis in a murine xenograft model. Gemcitabine was co-delivered with miR-203a using an EGFR-targeted cationic polymeric misted micelle system and shown to reduce tumor growth, increase apoptosis and inhibit EMT in an orthotopic pancreatic tumor model [165]. In breast cancer, miR-34a and doxorubicin were co-delivered using multi-functional nano-micellar carriers, resulting in reduced tumor formation and metastasis in vivo [166].

In addition to these pre-clinical studies, there are a number of clinical trials targeting metastasis-associated miRNAs. For example, miR-34 mimics encapsulated in liposomal carriers have been intravenously administered to patients with metastatic primary liver cancer, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), lymphoma, melanoma, multiple myeloma, renal cell carcinoma and NSCLC during a phase 1 trial (MRX34, miRNA Therapeutics Inc.) [167]. However, this trial was terminated before completion in 2016 after serious adverse immune-related effects were developed by some patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01829971, NCT02862145). MiRNA Therapeutics have several other miRNA-based clinical trials underway including a phase I trial to deliver a miR-155 antagomir (MRG-106 or Cobomarsen™), which is currently recruiting patients with lymphoma or leukemia (NCT02580552), and a phase II trial, which is currently recruiting cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients to compare with Vorinostat treatment (NCT03713320) and a separate follow-up trial (NCT03837457). The MesomiR-1 phase I clinical trial used TargomiR delivery vehicles (bacterially derived minicells containing a targeting antibody and miRNA mimic) to deliver miR-16 to 26 metastatic pleural mesothelioma patients using an anti-EGFR targeting antibody (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02369198) [168,169]. The trial closed in 2017, with a reported objective response of 5% with a duration of 32 weeks.

In summary, it can be seen from the breadth of evidence presented above that miRNAs (

Table 1. List of miRNAs associated with metastasis.

miRNA	Cancer	Express.	Sample	Target	Ref
Let-7	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	RAS & HMGA2	[14]
miR-7	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	FAK	[58]
miR-10b	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	HOXD10	[13]
miR-26a/b	HNSCC	Low	Cells & Tissue	LOXL2	[45]
miR-29 family	HNSCC	Low	Cells	LAMC2 & ITGA6	[44]
miR-29 family	HNSCC	Low	Cells & Tissue	LOXL2	[45]
miR-29 family	ccRCC	Low	Cells & Tissue	LOXL2	[46]
miR-29a	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	SUV420H2	[25]
miR-29c	Lung	Low	Cells	Integrin β1 & MMP2	[48]
miR-31	Breast	Low	Cells	Integrin α subunits	[60]
miR-31	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	WAVE3	[59]
miR-33b	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	HMGA2, SALL4 & Twist1	[65]
miR-34	CRC	Low	Cells	ZEB1 & Slug	[68]
miR-34a/b/c	CRC	Low	Cells	Snail	[170]
miR-34a	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	CXCL10	[171]
miR-34c	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	GIT1	[66]
miR-93	Endometrial	High	Cells & Tissue	FOXA1	[29]
miR-96	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	PTPN9	[23]
miR-96	HCC	High	Cells & Tissue	ephrinA5	[172]
miR-101	Ovarian	Low	Cells	ZEB1 & ZEB2	[69]
miR-101	NSCLC	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1	[173]
miR-105	Breast	High	Cells, Tissue & Serum	ZO-1	[17]
miR-124	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB2	[174]
miR-124	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	IL-11	[63]
miR-124	CRC	Low	Cells & Tissue	ROCK1	[55]
miR-128-3p	ESCC	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1	[175]
miR-130a	Breast	Low	Cells	FOSL1	[26]
miR-132	NSCLC	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB2	[73]
miR-132	CRC	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB2	[72]
miR-135a	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	HOXA10	[20]
miR-135a	HCC	High	Cells & Tissue	FOXO1	[22]
miR-135a	Gastric	Low	Cells & Tissue	ROCK1	[56]
miR-135b	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	APC	[21]
miR-138	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	ROCK1	[57]
miR-139-5p	Glioblastoma	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1 & ZEB2	[70]
miR-141	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	HIPK1	[176]
miR-141	Prostate	Low	Cells & Tissue	Rho GTases, CD44 & EZH2	[43]
miR-150	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	HMGA2	[62]
miR-154	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	E2F5	[61]
miR-181b	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	YWHAG	[18]
miR-182	HCC	High	Cells & Tissue	ephrinA5	[172]
miR-186-5p	CRC	Low	Cells	ZEB1	[177]
miR-190	Breast	Low	Cells	STC2	[178]
miR-190	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	SMAD2	[179]
miR-194	Ovarian	High	Cells & Tissue	PTPN12	[37]
miR-197	HCC	High	Cells & Tissue	Axin-2, NKD1 & DKK2	[30]
miR-200	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1 & ZEB2	[39]
miR-200a/b	Breast	Low	Cells	ZEB1 & ZEB2	[38]
miR-200c	Breast	Low	Cells	CRKL	[180]
miR-200c	Breast	Low	Cells	ZEB1	[181]
miR-200c	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	HIPK1	[176]
miR-203	HNSCC	Low	Cells & Tissue	LASP1, SPARC & NUAK	[49]
miR-203	Breast	Low	Cells	Slug	[50]
miR-203	CRC	Low	Cells & Tissue	EIF5A2	[54]
miR-203	Melanoma	Low	Cells & Tissue	Slug	[51]
miR-203	Ovarian	Low	Cells & Tissue	BIRC5	[52]
miR-203	Gastric	Low	Cells & Tissue	Annexin A4	[53]
miR-205	Breast	Low	Cells	ZEB1	[182]
miR-205	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1 & ZEB2	[39]
miR-210	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	E-Cadherin & Snail	[24]
miR-215	NSCLC	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB2	[71]
miR-218	HNSCC	Low	Cells & Tissue	LOXL2	[45]
miR-374a	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	WIF1, PTEN & WNT5A	[19]
miR-409-3p	Osteosarcoma	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1	[183]
miR-429	Breast	Low	Cells	ZEB1 & ZEB2	[38]
miR-504	NSCLC	Low	Cells & Tissue	LOXL2	[47]
miR-508-3p	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1	[184]
miR-520c	Gastic	High	Cells & Tissue	IRF2	[32]
miR-574-5p	NSCLC	High	Cells, Tissue & Serum	PTPRU	[36]
miR-577	Gastric	High	Cells & Tissue	SDPR	[31]
miR-641	Cervical	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1	[185]
miR-708-3p	Breast	Low	Cells & Tissue	ZEB1, CDH2 & Vimentin	[186]
miR-1204	Breast	High	Cells & Tissue	VDR	[28]
miR-1269a	Colorectal	High	Cells & Tissue	Smad7 & HOXD10	[33]
miR-8084	Breast	High	Cells, Tissue & Serum	ING2	[27]

HNSCC; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; CRC, colorectal cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung carcinoma; ESCC, esophageal cancer.

) represent a key regulatory control of metastasis in multiple cancers and, as a result, are promising targets for novel therapeutic approaches, although it is equally clear that much more research is still needed to translate this knowledge into the clinic.