Next Article in Journal
Monoclonal Antibodies Specific for STAT3β Reveal Its Contribution to Constitutive STAT3 Phosphorylation in Breast Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Stat5 Exerts Distinct, Vital Functions in the Cytoplasm and Nucleus of Bcr-Abl+ K562 and Jak2(V617F)+ HEL Leukemia Cells
Previous Article in Journal
The Future of Glioblastoma Therapy: Synergism of Standard of Care and Immunotherapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
STAT3 Activities and Energy Metabolism: Dangerous Liaisons
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/cancers6041986
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

STAT3: A Novel Molecular Mediator of Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy

by
Melanie Spitzner
1,*,
Reinhard Ebner
2,
Hendrik A. Wolff
3,
B. Michael Ghadimi
1,
Jürgen Wienands
4 and
Marian Grade
1,*
1
Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medicine Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, Göttingen 37075, Germany
2
Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
3
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, Göttingen 37075, Germany
4
Department of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, University Medicine Göttingen, Humboldtallee 34, Göttingen 37073, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2014, 6(4), 1986-2011; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers6041986
Submission received: 30 May 2014 / Revised: 28 August 2014 / Accepted: 4 September 2014 / Published: 29 September 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STAT3 Signalling in Cancer: Friend or Foe)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) represents a standard treatment for many human cancers, frequently combined with radical surgical resection. However, a considerable percentage of primary cancers are at least partially resistant to CRT, which represents a substantial clinical problem, because it exposes cancer patients to the potential side effects of both irradiation and chemotherapy. It is therefore exceedingly important to determine the molecular characteristics underlying CRT-resistance and to identify novel molecular targets that can be manipulated to re-sensitize resistant tumors to CRT. In this review, we highlight much of the recent evidence suggesting that the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays a prominent role in mediating CRT-resistance, and we outline why inhibition of STAT3 holds great promise for future multimodal treatment concepts in oncology.

1. Introduction

1.1. The Clinical Problem of Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of modern multimodal treatment concepts for various tumor entities, because it increases local response and control rates, often facilitates complete surgical resection (tumor-free resection margins) and, thus, is able to improve patient survival [1,2,3,4]. In multimodal treatment strategies, RT is typically combined with surgical approaches. Radiation therapy can be administered as a single-treatment modality or combined with concomitant chemotherapy, which may serve as a radiosensitizer. The goal of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is to achieve tumor cell damage, primarily achieved through irradiation-mediated effects. These effects are largely the result of DNA damage, which either occurs directly through ionization within the DNA molecule or indirectly from the action of chemical radicals, which are also formed during irradiation [5,6,7].
However, the response to CRT varies tremendously from one patient to another. While there is a clear benefit for patients who experience a pronounced tumor remission after CRT, this poses a particular problem for patients with a priori resistant tumors, because they may be exposed to irradiation and chemotherapy, treatment regimens that are expensive and at times toxic. Accordingly, there is a strong clinical need to identify novel molecular targets that can be manipulated in order to sensitize a priori resistant tumors to multimodal treatment regimens and to increase the fraction of cancer patients that respond to CRT. A number of recent studies revealed that members of the Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT) family of proteins, and most prominently, STAT3, are promising candidates for such drug targets. Here, we summarize the role of STAT3 in various tumor entities and how this knowledge may be used to improve the treatment of CRT-resistant tumors.

1.2. The JAK/STAT Signaling Paradigm in Cancer

STAT proteins were discovered more than 20 years ago by James E. Darnell and colleagues when they investigated the molecular mechanisms of how interferons mediate their potent antiviral activities [8,9]. However, it soon became clear that STATs are involved in the regulation of many specialized, as well as housekeeping cell processes. STATs function as essential signal transducing effector proteins of cytokine- or hormone-induced pathways that control the development, proliferation or differentiation, as well as the homeostasis of many cell types [10,11,12,13]. Cell surface receptors that utilize STAT effectors are intracellularly associated with members of the Janus family of protein tyrosine kinases (JAKs) that, upon receptor activation by ligand binding, phosphorylate STAT proteins at specific tyrosine residues. Phosphorylated STATs homo- or hetero-dimerize, by virtue of their Src homology (SH) 2 domain, and subsequently translocate from the cytosol into the nucleus to regulate the transcription of specific target genes [14,15,16,17].
The pathway is regulated at all of its component steps, for example by the action of protein phosphatases, by inhibitors of phosphorylation or by nuclear inhibitory factors. Prominent negative regulators are members of the suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) and protein inhibitors of activated STAT (PIAS) family [18]. Furthermore, STAT proteins may also be activated through direct phosphorylation by some receptor tyrosine kinases, e.g., EGFR, or non-receptor kinases, e.g., c-SRC [16,19,20,21].
The JAK/STAT pathway has been observed in diverse animal species, including slime molds, worms, flies and all vertebrates, but not in fungi or plants. Since the characterization of their first prototype members, seven STATs and four JAKs have been described in mammalian cells. Among the STATs, STAT3 is more highly conserved than others and appears to be less pathway-specific, to be activated by a wider range of factors and stimuli and to possibly modulate a wider variety of processes [22,23]. STAT3 may therefore represent the more primordial, general STAT type.
Concluding from data generated while studying its role in controlling cell cycle progression, apoptosis and tumorigenesis for over a decade, STAT3 has been recognized as a prominent oncogene. It is required to maintain the transformed phenotype in many cells and organs, and many cancer-derived cells depend on its sustained presence and activity [24,25,26,27] (Figure 1).
Cancers 06 01986 g001 550
Figure 1. STAT3 modulates several signaling pathways and affects numerous cellular processes.
Figure 1. STAT3 modulates several signaling pathways and affects numerous cellular processes.
Cancers 06 01986 g001
However, as has been the case with STAT1 some years earlier, a potentially tumor-suppressive role for STAT3 has also been recently proposed [28]. On the other hand, in light of the many different signaling pathways and complex regulatory networks that STAT3 participates in, context-dependent effects cannot be surprising [24,25,29,30].
Sustained activation of STAT3 can promote tumor cell survival and migration. Persistent STAT3 activity can also enhance stem cell-like and mesenchymal properties, making obstruction of the pathway through which it signals a potentially attractive therapeutic strategy. In several studies, increasing in number through the last few years, STAT3 has also been implicated in resistance to radiation. Its combined roles in growth control, cancer stem cell (CSC) maintenance and radioresistance have lent growing credence to the therapy-sensitizing potential of STAT3 inhibition [25,31,32,33,34,35].

2. STAT3 as a Molecular Target to Sensitize Tumors to (Chemo-) Radiotherapy

Over the last decade, a large number of tumor-derived cell lines, as well as many primary human cancer tissues have been reported to overexpress and/or constitutively activate STAT3 [36,37]. Conceivably owing to its diverse functions in controlling various (patho-) physiological cellular processes, there is a mounting body of evidence demonstrating that STAT3 also plays a critical role in mediating resistance to CRT.

2.1. Brain Tumors

Gliomas are the most frequent and malignant type of brain tumors in adults [38,39]. The standard treatment approach for this tumor type consists of a complete surgical resection followed by CRT and, partly, chemotherapy [38,40].
The first hint that STAT3 may be involved in the aggressiveness of human gliomas was the discovery of an amplified expression of the Interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene in glioblastoma tissue samples and cell lines [41]. Another analysis of 111 patients with glioblastoma showed that 76.6% of the specimens had a positive staining for phosphorylated STAT3-Tyr705 (pSTAT3Tyr705), and those patients carrying tumors with a strong staining had a shorter survival caused by a more aggressive subtype [42]. In 2008, Brantley et al. suggested that STAT3 may be an attractive therapeutic target for glioblastoma because STAT3 is constitutively active as a consequence of phosphorylation at both Tyr705, as well as Ser727 [43]. Interestingly, in vitro, levels of constitutive STAT3 activation vary in cultured glioblastoma cell lines, but most cells show a constitutive expression of the IL-6 cytokine family [43]. Furthermore, the authors observed that PIAS3, an endogenous inhibitor of STAT3, was largely absent in human glioblastoma tissues. This is in contrast to SOCS3, another endogenous inhibitor of STAT3, which is a direct transcriptional target of STAT3 and highly expressed in primary tumors from glioblastoma multiforme patients [44]. Importantly, SOCS3 expression correlated positively with radioresistance in U87 cells [44]. Zhou et al. also demonstrated that ectopic expression of a dominant-negative variant of STAT3 (DN-STAT3-Y705F) in U87 cells resulted in a reduced survival fraction (SF) after a single irradiation with 4 Gy from 43% in control cells to 22% in DN-STAT3-Y705F transfected cells [44], indicating an increased sensitivity to irradiation. Radiosensitization after STAT3 modulation has also been shown using RNAi-based approaches in U87 and U251 glioblastoma cells in vitro and in vivo [45]. This sensitizing effect was correlated with an induction of apoptosis by the initiator caspase-8/9 and the effector caspase-3/7 [45]. Subsequently, the authors combined RNAi against STAT3 and ErbB2 with irradiation in an U251 xenograft mouse model, which led to a highly significant inhibition of tumor growth compared to single RNAi treatment without toxic effects in normal astrocytes from the brain of Wistar rats [45]. A recent study reported an increased radiosensitivity in constitutively STAT3 expressing glioblastoma multiforme cell line-derived CD133+ cells and GBM-CD133+ xenografts following treatment with the STAT3-inhibitor AG490 and resveratrol (RV) [46]. In contrast to the findings described above, two other constitutively STAT3 expressing glioblastoma cell lines (SF763 and SNB19) could not be sensitized to irradiation after treatment with JSI-124 (cucurbitacin I) or a neutralizing gp130-blocking antibody [47]. However, this conflicting observation may be explained by the fact that Chautard et al. used a relatively low concentration (0.01 µM), which actually failed to elicit a detectable reduction of pSTAT3Tyr705 by Western blot analyses.

2.2. Breast Cancer

Breast cancer represents the most common cancer in females worldwide and the second-leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. [39,48]. After breast-conserving surgery for invasive disease, adjuvant breast irradiation is recommended for most patients in order to decrease the risk of local recurrence [49,50].
Constitutive activation of STAT3 in breast cancer cell lines and primary cancers has been demonstrated by many groups [51,52,53,54]. This activation was successfully inhibited using AG490, a JAK2 inhibitor and via stable expression of a dominant negative variant of STAT3, STAT3β [55]. This led to a suppression of tumor cell growth, a decreased colony formation and an induction of apoptosis, but spared normal cells or cancer cells lacking constitutively active STAT3 [55]. Kim and colleagues were the first to demonstrate that overexpression of another dominant-negative STAT3, which inhibits phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr705, resulted in radiosensitization of human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells [56]. Moreover, Kang et al. showed that treatment with the natural flavonoid compound, xanthohumol, which decreases expression levels of STAT3 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), increased the sensitivity of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, as well as doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 cells by inducing apoptosis [57].

2.3. Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, with more than one million new cases every year [39,58]. For locally advanced rectal cancer, the standard treatment consists of preoperative CRT, followed by radical surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy [58,59,60].
Spitzner and colleagues were the first to demonstrate that STAT3 represents a potential molecular target for CRT-sensitization in this disease. After having established an in vitro model for chemoradiosensitivity, the authors showed that STAT3 gene expression correlated positively with increasing resistance of CRC cell lines to 3 µM of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 2 Gy of radiation [61]. This was subsequently confirmed on the protein level, as well [62]. While STAT3 was not constitutively active, stimulation with IL-6 resulted in remarkably higher expression levels of phosphorylated STAT3 in CRT-resistant cell lines. The authors further demonstrated that siRNA- and shRNA-mediated silencing of STAT3, as well as treatment with the small-molecule inhibitor STATTIC, which blocks STAT3 phosphorylation, significantly decreased clonogenic survival of CRC cell lines following exposure to 3 µM of 5-FU and irradiation in a dose-dependent manner, with dose-modifying factors (DMF) of 1.3 to 2.5 at a surviving fraction of 0.37 [62]. In addition, STATTIC-treatment resulted in CRT-sensitization in a subcutaneous xenograft model, with a significantly delayed tumor re-growth in STATTIC-treated mice compared with control animals. Additional indirect evidence that STAT3 mediates resistance to CRT comes from studies by Urick and colleagues, who treated CRC cell lines with the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib, which resulted in increased sensitivity to 5-FU-based CRT in vitro and in vivo, with DMFs at 10% survival rate of 1.52 and 1.78, respectively [63]. This CRT-sensitization was accompanied by decreased STAT3 phosphorylation and an increase in mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis.

2.4. Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer represents another leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, with overall five-year survival rates in the range of 15% to 25% worldwide [39,64]. In locally advanced stages of the disease, treatment generally involves a multidisciplinary approach, depending on the underlying histology (squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC)) and factors, such as localization of the tumor and comorbidities of the patient: either preoperative CRT or chemotherapy combined with radical surgical resection, or definitive CRT without surgical resection [64,65].
Chen and colleagues demonstrated that 47% of 173 SCC of the esophagus were positive for p-STAT3 in an immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and approximately 50% were positive for pSTAT3 in a tissue microarray (TMA) [66]. Subsequently, the authors analyzed IL-6 levels in their cohort of 173 patients [67]. IL-6 was overexpressed in tumor tissues compared to adjacent non-malignant epithelial tissues, and this expression was significantly associated with poorer treatment response rates, shorter survival, and the development of distant metastases. In CE81T cells, shRNA-mediated down-regulation of IL-6 expression resulted in a significantly inhibited tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, attenuated invasive capacity of esophageal cancer cells in migration scratch assays, increased radiation sensitivity, and delayed tumor growth in mice, associated with enhanced DNA damage and reduced STAT3 activation [67].

2.5. Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer represents the most common cancer type in men [39]. The management of low-risk or favorable-risk prostate cancer is highly controversial, and thus, different options, like watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), are individually used for early stage disease [68,69]. For high-risk or locally advanced patients, there is also an ongoing discussion on the optimal multimodal management strategy. Single-modality treatment with RP or EBRT results in a similar progression-free survival of about 50% at eight years. However, multimodal approaches, including RP, EBRT and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), achieved the best overall long-term outcomes [70].
An analysis of 45 prostate adenocarcinomas revealed elevated STAT3 DNA-binding activity in 37 (82%) of 45 tumors when compared to matched non-carcinoma tissues [71]. Furthermore, higher levels of pStat3Tyr705 were detected in the nuclei of epithelial tumor cells, and pSTAT3 activation was correlated significantly with more aggressive histology (Gleason scores ≥7). In vitro, STAT3 DNA-binding activity and constitutively active STAT3 were observed in three human prostate cancer cell lines (DU145, PC3, and LNCaP). Blockade of STAT3 activity using siRNAs resulted in reduced cell growth and increased apoptosis measured by caspase-3 activation [71]. Very recently, Wu and colleagues investigated the radiation response after manipulation of IL-6 signaling in vitro and in vivo. IL-6 inhibition enhanced the radiation sensitivity of prostate cancer cells due to increased expression of p53, increased cell death, and augmented DNA damage [31]. Furthermore, IL-6 inhibition in tumor-bearing mice resulted in decreased tumor regrowth following irradiation.

2.6. Bladder Cancer

Preoperative chemotherapy followed by cystectomy or CRT is commonly used to treat muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, many tumors are resistant against multimodal treatment procedures, and unfortunately, around 50% of the patients are diagnosed with local relapse or distant metastases within five years [72,73].
In a panel of high-grade human non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder tumors, Sun et al. examined cytoplasmic and nuclear staining for total and phosphorylated STAT3. Differences between tumor and normal cells were detected in nuclear stainings of total STAT3, with higher expression levels in carcinoma tissues [74]. High protein levels of phosphorylated STAT3 were only observed in tumor tissues and also in six different bladder cancer cell lines [74], indicating pronounced STAT3 activation [75]. Importantly, treatment with diindolylmethane (DIM) induced apoptosis in bladder cancer cell lines that were resistant to radiotherapy [74].

2.7. Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer is the second most common tumor among women worldwide and belongs to the group of human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated cancers. It is treated with surgery or multimodality therapy and associated with a good prognosis if diagnosed in early stages of the disease [76]. For locally advanced cervical cancer, different randomized clinical trials showed a 30% to 50% decrease in risk of death by the addition of concurrent platinum-based CRT when compared with radiotherapy alone [77].
Constitutive activation of STAT3 plays a prominent role in the development and progression of cervical cancer [78]. Chen and colleagues reported constitutive activation of STAT3 in 22% of 165 cervical cancers [79]. However, no significant correlation was found with clinical parameters, like overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival, and metastasis-free survival [79]. In vitro studies of human HeLa cells, which were treated with cepharanthine (CEP), established this compound as a potential radiosensitizer for cell lines with an overexpression and constitutive activation of STAT3 [80]. Both in vivo and in vitro experiments showed that the reduction of both cellular and tumor growth was more pronounced when ionizing radiation and CEP were combined (DMF = 1.31), compared with either CEP or irradiation alone [80].

2.8. Head and Neck Cancer

An extensive body of evidence highlighting the role of STAT3 in mediating resistance to (chemo-) radiotherapy first originated from analyses of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). In Europe, the standard therapy of HNSCC, which include cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, pharynx and larynx, consists of surgery and, in cases of locally advanced tumors, postoperative (chemo-) radiotherapy. For primary unresectable tumors, a definitive platinum-based CRT is applied [81,82,83].
STAT3 represents a particular promising target in this tumor entity, because, especially for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, RT can be combined with an EGFR inhibitor, as activation of EGFR signaling commonly stimulates STAT3 phosphorylation [84,85]. In HNSCC, EGFR and STAT3 are overexpressed in the predominant majority of cases [86,87,88], and pSTAT3 expression correlated with poor prognosis [89,90,91]. Kruser and colleagues incubated the HNSCC cell line UM-SCC-1 with the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab, followed by irradiation. Phosphorylation of STAT3 was inhibited by panitumumab, accompanied by a sensitization to irradiation both in vitro and in vivo [92]. Chen et al. used IL-6 to stimulate STAT3 signaling in the cetuximab-resistant hypopharyngeal cancer cell line FaDu (FaDu-C225-R), which resulted in an enhanced surviving fraction following irradiation when compared to unstimulated cells [90]. When IL-6 signaling was blocked by an IL-6 antibody, FaDu-C225-R cells were sensitized to radiation therapy comparable to the level of wild-type FaDu cells [90].
As shown by several groups, direct targeting of STAT3 via siRNA [93], shRNA [32,94], or the small-molecule inhibitor STATTIC [95,96] resulted in a significant radiosensitization of HNSCC cells in vitro and in vivo. Chen and colleagues demonstrated that cucurbitacin I (JSI-124), which is supposed to represent a potential chemo- and radio-sensitizer [97], decreased the expression level of pSTAT3Tyr705 in a subset of CD44+/ALDH1+ cells from HNSCC patient-derived tumors, which showed high levels of p-STAT3 and displayed typical properties of putative cancer stem cell (CSC) [91]. This was associated with enhanced radiosensitivity, attenuated invasion capability, soft agar sphere formation, suppressed tumor growth of xenotransplanted CD44+/ALDH1+ cells, and decreased lung metastatic ability in vivo. Hsu and colleagues treated the radio-resistant HNSCC cell lines SCC-22A and SCC-22B, which both express constitutively activated STAT3 at high levels, with the multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor linifanib (ABT-869). Treatment with linifanib, which indirectly inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation through modulation of its upstream kinases, resulted in re-sensitization to radiation therapy [98].
Mechanistically, there is evidence to suggest that the sensitization effect following combined STAT3 inhibition and radiation in HNSCC is mediated by apoptosis [32,92,93,94,95,98], enhanced residual DNA-damage assessed by γH2AX staining [92] or comet assay [94], G2/M cell cycle arrest [98], and reduced tumor angiogenesis in murine xenografts of HNSCC cells [32].

2.9. Lung Cancer

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in both men and women [39]. Approximately 80% of all pulmonary malignancies are non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) [3]. In patients with stage II and IIIa NSCLC, a platinum-based postoperative chemotherapy has improved the long-term survival after surgery. For patients with locally advanced disease, a CRT, preferably given concurrently, is the standard approach, while a platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer [3].
From 303 cases of human NSCLC, expression of total STAT3 could be detected in 91% of cases, while pSTAT3 was present in 61% of cases [99]. These findings provide a basis for therapeutic targeting of STAT3 in this disease. Purnell et al. used the Src inhibitor AZD0530 to treat A549 and Calu-6 lung cancer cell lines, which resulted in a significant inhibition of cell migration, invasion and enhanced sensitivity to irradiation [100]. Treatment of HCC2429 and H460 lung cancer cells with the JAK2 inhibitor TG101209 led to a reduced phosphorylation of STAT3, inhibition of survivin, increased apoptosis, and decreased cell proliferation [101]. This resulted in enhanced radiosensitivity in vitro, extended tumor growth delay and a lower vascular density in lung cancer xenografts.
Another serine/threonine protein kinase that phosphorylates STAT3 is CK2. Treatment of A549 and H460 (EGFR wild-type) and H1650 and H1975 (EGFR mutant) lung cancer cell lines with three different CK2 inhibitors (4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H-benzotriazole (TBB), tetrabromocinnamic acid (TBCA), and hematein) resulted in reduced STAT3 activation, growth suppression, and enhanced radiosensitivity [102]. Although EGFR mutant cell lines needed higher concentrations of the CK2 inhibitors to suppress pSTAT3, successful inhibition followed by radiation resulted in radiosensitization, independent of the EGFR mutation status of the respective cell line.
Using RNAi-mediated inhibition of STAT3 expression, Yin and colleagues showed enhanced sensitization to radiotherapy in A549 and SK-MES-1 lung cancer cells [103]. This effect resulted from suppressed proliferation and increased apoptosis in shSTAT3 transfected cells and sensitization was validated in an in vivo mouse model. Hsu and colleagues isolated cancer stem-like CD133+ cells from NSCLC patients and investigated the combined effect of cucurbitacin I and irradiation [104]. They observed an inhibitor-dependent decrease of STAT3 phosphorylation, which provoked abrogated tumor growth, sphere formation ability, and increased radio- and chemo-sensitivity (cisplatin, doxorubicin, paclitaxel) in CD133+ NSCLC cells.

2.10. Skin Cancer

DNA is a strong absorber of ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation in cells, which causes DNA damage and mutations [105]. For protection from cancer, the human skin is very well adapted to this environmental stress, so that UVB-irradiated keratinocytes undergo G1 cell cycle arrest to allow for DNA damage repair or, if damage levels are too high, induce apoptotic pathways [105]. STAT3 is a key regulator of keratinocytes in response to UVB irradiation and plays an important role in initiation, promotion and progression of skin cancer [106,107,108]. Sano et al. demonstrated that STAT3 was constitutively activated in UVB-induced human skin cancer specimens and in a mouse model of skin cancer. Murine STAT3−/− keratinocytes showed an increased UVB radiation sensitivity when compared to wild-type mice [109]. After transfer of ectopic STAT3 plasmid DNA into STAT3-deficient mice and subsequent UVB irradiation, this sensitivity could be reversed, with concomitant reduction in UBV-induced apoptosis.
Melanoma represents the most aggressive type of skin cancer, known to be relatively resistant to radio- or chemo-therapy and with a high risk to metastasize [110]. Johnson and colleagues treated the murine melanoma cell line SW1, which is highly radioresistant, with a combination of radiation and resveratrol (RV), an inhibitor of STAT3-dependent transcription. This treatment resulted in a pronounced decrease of the clonogenic survival due to RV-induced apoptosis [111]. Similar results could be confirmed in the human melanoma cell line WM35.
Bonner and colleagues demonstrated a potential role for STAT3 signaling in mediating resistance of epithelial squamous cell carcinoma to CRT [112]. They could show that RNAi-mediated silencing of STAT3 resulted in radiosensitization of A431 cells.

2.11. Other Cancers

For various tumor entities, only limited data are available. A selection of these reports is summarized below.
B-1 cells, a subset of B-cells that predominate in the peritoneal cavity and that express a constitutively active form of pSTAT3Ser727, are known to be resistant to irradiation [113]. Otero and colleagues investigated radiation-induced apoptosis in mouse B-1 wild-type and STAT3−/− B-1 cells [25]. Whereas 80% of wild-type B-1 cells could be recovered from the peritoneal cavity 48 h after irradiation at 5 Gy, only 30% of B-1 cells lacking STAT3 survived the radiation, primarily caused by an increased apoptosis [25].
Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a very rare, but highly dedifferentiated, tumor with a devastating prognosis, and treatment concepts typically involve a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy [114]. CD133+ cells derived from either ATC cell lines or ATC patients have been reported to exhibit cancer stem cell properties [115]. A literature-based network analysis by Tseng et al. suggested that STAT3 signaling is a key factor in regulating cancer-related biomolecular signatures and pathways in ATC-CD133+ cells that are strongly associated with dedifferentiation and thyroid tumorigenesis [116]. Subsequently, patient-derived ATC-CD133+ cells were treated with the STAT3 inhibitor cucurbitacin I, which resulted in an increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs (cisplatin, 5-FU, and doxorubicin), and an increased sensitivity to different doses of ionizing radiation. In ATC-CD133+ xenotransplanted mice, radiation at 4 Gy combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy therapy or cucurbitacin I alone resulted in a suppressed proliferation of CD133+ cells. Moreover, a combination of all three components dramatically diminished tumor growth, effectively reduced the number of lung metastases, and significantly prolonged survival when compared to single treated mice [116].
Very recently, treatment with the multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib resulted in increased radiosensitivity of four hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines [117]. The same result was observed with siRNAs targeting STAT3. Sensitizing effects were due to increased apoptosis as a result of down-regulated pSTAT3Tyr705 and diminished activation of STAT3 signaling related proteins. To reverse the sorafenib-associated radiosensitization, Huang et al. generated a stable STAT3 overexpressing HCC cell line, which resulted in a complete abolishment of the previous observed sensitizing effect [117]. These results were further validated in vivo [117].

3. Potential Mechanisms of STAT3-Mediated Radio- and Chemoradiotherapy-Resistance

Because of the numerous and fairly diverse biochemical processes that STAT3 affects, it is very likely that STAT3 serves as a sensitizer to radiation and chemotherapy in more than one specific way and that it may act depending on the respective cellular and developmental context. Much of our knowledge leading to the emerging picture of the likely mechanism(s) of therapy resistance has come from studies of downstream targets in cell lines and tumor models and from in vitro investigations of its cellular trafficking and processing.
Evaluation of the direct targets transcriptionally activated by STAT3 has given further support to its important roles in cell growth and survival pathways. STAT3 suppresses apoptosis genes and induces expression of proliferation genes, as well as stemness-promoting or -preserving gene targets and, also, some known oncogenes [20,118,119,120,121]. Furthermore, stress response pathway components have both been found to be regulators of STAT3 activity or to be regulated by it. Several DNA repair genes are also targets of STAT3 [122,123].
Nuclear translocation of STAT3, phosphorylated as a consequence of extracellular signals received by cellular receptors, is required for any of its downstream actions. The process is not fully understood, but is known to depend on several importins [124,125,126]. Re-translocation into the cytoplasm is probably required for maintaining signal responsiveness. While nuclear export mechanisms appear to differ for different STAT proteins, nuclear export signals located in or near the DNA binding domains are critical in all cases. Elegant studies with nuclear export blockers have shown that STAT3 export is dependent on multiple NES elements. This may well be due to the fact that the essential and multiple roles of this factor necessitate especially tight regulation of its actions [127].
Of obvious clinical relevance are the actions of STAT3 in promoting cell migration and tissue invasion. Direct pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 has been shown to inhibit these processes in various settings, in some cases along with reducing the induction of the expression of known metastasis genes [74,128,129,130,131]. Moreover, STAT3 has been shown to mediate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in different carcinomas, either alone or in combination with other triggers [130,132,133]. Interestingly, oxidative stress appears to impair several regulatory pathway chains to promote persistent STAT3 activation, in mesenchymal and other cell types [134].
In this context, it should also be mentioned that, in addition to the well-established pathway centering on receptor-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3, physiological functions of STAT3 outside the nucleus, in the cytoplasm, and especially within mitochondria have been recently reported. Exploration of these non-genomic functions is still in its early stages, but important consequences for the growth and metabolism of both normal and malignant cells have been postulated [135,136]. STAT3 (and, in fact, other STATs) localizes to the mitochondria and affects the respiratory electron transport chain, adding to its roles in cellular defense against stress or injury [137,138], and reduced STAT3 expression can impair mitochondrial function [139]. Consistent with this, blocking STAT3 activity with antioxidants, as well as STAT3 activation by reactive oxygen species has been shown to enhance cell survival [140], while mitochondrial overexpression of STAT3 promoted the growth of cancer cells [141]. Targeting mitochondrial STAT3, e.g., by inhibiting its mitochondrial import, has shown promise in the treatment of pancreatic cancer in animal models [142].
As mentioned above, because of the numerous physiological processes that STAT3 affects and the large number of different signals it transduces, it is very likely that it can account for therapy resistance in more than a single way and that it may act differently depending on the cellular and developmental context.

4. STAT3 Inhibitors in Clinical Translation

In addition to the many biochemical and physiological observations outlined above, the idea to target JAK/STAT signaling as a therapeutic strategy to overcome resistance to chemoradiotherapy is, in large part, also inspired by the fact that a sizeable and continuously increasing number of drugs that inhibit JAK/STAT signaling have already been tested in clinical trials or have been approved by the FDA.
In the past decade, various strategies have been explored to develop and implement effective STAT3 inhibitors [143,144,145]. Substances that block STAT3 signaling were primarily identified from screenings of libraries of natural compounds or chemically synthesized small molecules [146]. For inhibitor design, different strategies are available to disrupt STAT3 activity: first, a blockade of upstream signaling receptors; second, induction of the activity of phosphatases that dephosphorylate STAT3; third, prevention of nuclear translocation and DNA binding of STAT3; and fourth, direct inhibition of the STAT3 protein via its SH2 domain or phosphorylation sites [144,145]. However, to our knowledge, none of those direct STAT3 inhibitors (several of which were successfully tested in pre-clinical research) are currently in translational clinical studies for the treatment of cancer patients. Some of the main reasons for this disconnect are the often high concentrations needed to exert their effects, poor drug delivery, toxicity in vivo, and stability problems due to biologically labile groups that may react with multiple targets [86,145,147].
In clear contrast, several Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors that block upstream signaling are in clinical development. Selected orally available and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-competitive small-molecule JAK kinase inhibitors (ruxolitinib (INC424), SAR302503 (TG101348), pacritinib (SB1518), CYT387, AZD1480, tasocitinib, INCB028050, CEP-701, XL019) have already been tested in clinical trials for myelofibrosis and rheumatoid arthritis, for pancreatic and breast cancer, and for hematologic malignancies [11,148,149,150]. Small-molecule inhibitors that interfere with STAT3 upstream signaling have also been developed for Src kinase. For instance, saracatinib (AZD0530) was tested in phase II trials for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [151]. The dual Src/Abl inhibitor dasatinib (BMS-354825) has shown preclinical antitumor activity in solid tumors and clinical activity in leukemia [152]. Because STAT3 can also be phosphorylated by the IL-6 signaling cascade and because IL-6 is one of the most ubiquitously deregulated cytokines in cancer, it is a rational biological target for therapeutic investigations [150]. Antibodies against IL-6 (CNTO 328, siltuximab) or the IL-6 receptor (tocilizumab, REGN-88) have been used in several clinical trials in different tumor entities, including multiple myeloma, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, and renal cell carcinoma, and have been found to be well tolerated [150,153]. Although their exact mechanism of STAT3 inhibition is not clear, two other compounds are actually tested in early phase clinical trials for cancer patients. Pyrimethamine [146], an antimalarial drug, is in phase I/II trials for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma [154]. The NF-κB/STAT3 inhibitor RTA 402 is currently undergoing phase I/II clinical testing for pancreatic cancer [155] and a phase I trial in patients with solid tumors and lymphoid malignancies has already been completed [156].
Obviously, as JAK/STAT signaling controls a variety of cellular processes and affects the microenvironment, as well as the immune system, therapeutic targeting may have a wide range of systemic ramifications [11,145,150,157]. For instance, chronic exposure to JAK inhibitors can result in hematologic toxicities, such as anemia and thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal disturbances [148,149]. Pertinent to the latter, very recent evidence indicates that STAT3 inhibition may impair the host protection from intestinal bacterial infection and increase the risk for pathogen-mediated diarrhea [158]. However, while STAT3 has been shown to be essential for the early development of mouse embryos [159], the role of STAT3 in transformed cells seems to be mechanistically distinct from its function in normal cells [160], and therapeutic targeting would generally not completely abolish STAT3 expression. Furthermore, if JAK/STAT inhibitors were used as CRT-sensitizer, exposure time would be limited to a few weeks, thereby potentially avoiding the side effects of chronic inhibitor treatment. Potentially, this may even allow the application of higher inhibitor doses.

5. Perspective and Conclusions

Treatment resistance represents a substantial and complex problem in modern cancer therapy as more and more patients are treated with CRT or combinations of irradiation and other modalities. It can be speculated that overcoming resistance will not solely depend on the addition of conventional or new chemotherapeutic drugs, but rather will require the integration of drugs that target pathways or genetic conditions that are specifically activated or deregulated in resistant cancer cells. There is now a convincing body of evidence that JAK/STAT signaling is one such pathway that holds great promise for future treatment concepts for two main reasons:
First, STAT3 signaling is frequently activated, often constitutively, in a variety of human malignancies, including cancers of the head and neck, colorectum, cervix, breast, and esophagus. Because radiation therapy is an integral part of the respective treatment regimens, targeting STAT3 represents a promising strategy for these entities. Second, both in vitro and in vivo data convincingly suggest that JAK/STAT signaling mediates resistance to CRT and that pathway inhibition increases treatment sensitivity (Table 1). Third, an increasing number of drugs that target JAK/STAT signaling are emerging on the horizon, which are being tested in clinical trials or that have been approved by the FDA, and consequently have already been integrated into the management of patients [148,149]. Obviously, this represents an essential prerequisite for the successful transfer into clinical treatment strategies.
Thus, we envision that pre-therapeutic assessment of JAK/STAT signaling activity may help to selectively stratify patients and that CRT combined with simultaneous inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling may be implemented for tumors with high pathway activity (Figure 2). This would have considerable clinical implications.
Table
Table 1. Reports on RT- or CRT-sensitization by STAT3 pathway modulation.
Table 1. Reports on RT- or CRT-sensitization by STAT3 pathway modulation.
Tumor TypeTreatmentPathway ModulationSensitization In VitroSensitization In VivoReference
Anaplastic thyroid cancerRT/CRT (cisplatin)Cucurbitacin I (JSI-124)yesyes[116]
Breast cancerRTDN-STAT3yesn.a.[56]
RTXanthohumolyesn.a.[57]
Cervical cancerRTCepharanthineyesyes[80]
Colorectal cancerCRT (5-FU)STAT3 shRNA
STAT3 siRNA
STATTIC		yes
yes
yes		n.a.
n.a.
yes		[62]
CRT (5-FU)Selumetinib (AZD6244)yesyes[63]
Esophageal cancerRTIL-6 shRNAyesyes[66]
GlioblastomaRTDN-STAT3yesn.a.[44]
RTSTAT3 siRNAyesyes[45]
RTResveratrol
STAT3 shRNA
AG490		yes
yes
yes		yes[46]
RTCucurbitacin I (JSI-124)
gp130-blocking antibody		no
no		n.a.[47]
Head and neck cancerRTPanitumumab
Panitumumab		yes
no (SCC-1483)		yes
n.a.		[92]
RTIL-6 antibodyyesn.a.[90]
RTSTAT3 siRNAyesn.a.[93]
RTSTAT3 shRNAn.a.yes[32]
RTSTAT3 siRNAyesn.a.[94]
RT
STATTIC
STATTIC		yes
no (UM-SCC-22B)		yes
n.a.		[95]
RTSTATTICyesn.a.[96]
RTCucurbitacin I (JSI-124)yesyes[91]
RTLinifanib (ABT-869)yesn.a.[98]
Hepatocellular carcinomaRTSTAT3 siRNA
Sorafenib		yes
yes		n.a.
yes		[117]
LeukemiaRTStat3−/− mouse B-1 cellsyesn.a.[25]
Lung cancerRTPanitumumabyesyes[92]
RTSaracatinib (AZD0530)
PP2		yes
no		n.a.[100]
RTTG101209yesyes[101]
RTTBB
TBCA
Hematein		yes
yes
yes		n.a.[102]
RTSTAT3 shRNAyesyes[103]
RTCucurbitacin I (JSI-124)yesyes[104]
MelanomaRTResveratrolyesn.a.[111]
RTSTAT3 siRNA
STAT3 shRNA		yes
yes		n.a.[112]
Prostate cancerRTIL-6 shRNAyesyes[31]
Skin cancerUVB-RTStat3−/− mouse keratinocytesyesyes[109]
RT = radiation therapy, DN = dominant negative, n.a. = not applicable, DMF = dose modifying factor, CRT = chemoradiotherapy, 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil, IL-6 = interleukin-6, PP2 = 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(dimethylethyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine, TBB = 4,5,6,7-Tetrabromo-1H-benzotriazole, TBCA = Tetrabromocinnamic acid, UVB = ultraviolet B.
Cancers 06 01986 g002 550
Figure 2. Outlook: JAK/STAT activity-guided patient stratification and management.
Figure 2. Outlook: JAK/STAT activity-guided patient stratification and management.
Cancers 06 01986 g002

Acknowledgments

The work of the authors is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Klinische Forschergruppe 179).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rodel, C.; Liersch, T.; Becker, H.; Fietkau, R.; Hohenberger, W.; Hothorn, T.; Graeven, U.; Arnold, D.; Lang-Welzenbach, M.; Raab, H.R.; et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: Initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Jagsi, R. Progress and controversies: Radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2013, 64, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Reck, M.; Heigener, D.F.; Mok, T.; Soria, J.C.; Rabe, K.F. Management of non-small-cell lung cancer: Recent developments. Lancet 2013, 382, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Thariat, J.; Hannoun-Levi, J.M.; Sun Myint, A.; Vuong, T.; Gerard, J.P. Past, present, and future of radiotherapy for the benefit of patients. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 10, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Seiwert, T.Y.; Salama, J.K.; Vokes, E.E. The concurrent chemoradiation paradigm—General principles. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2007, 4, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Katz, D.; Ito, E.; Liu, F.F. On the path to seeking novel radiosensitizers. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009, 73, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Begg, A.C.; Stewart, F.A.; Vens, C. Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Shuai, K.; Stark, G.R.; Kerr, I.M.; Darnell, J.E., Jr. A single phosphotyrosine residue of Stat91 required for gene activation by interferon-gamma. Science 1993, 261, 1744–1746. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Shuai, K.; Ziemiecki, A.; Wilks, A.F.; Harpur, A.G.; Sadowski, H.B.; Gilman, M.Z.; Darnell, J.E. Polypeptide signalling to the nucleus through tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak and Stat proteins. Nature 1993, 366, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. O'Shea, J.J.; Holland, S.M.; Staudt, L.M. JAKs and STATs in immunity, immunodeficiency, and cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Quintas-Cardama, A.; Verstovsek, S. Molecular pathways: Jak/STAT pathway: Mutations, inhibitors, and resistance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 1933–1940. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Schroder, K.; Hertzog, P.J.; Ravasi, T.; Hume, D.A. Interferon-gamma: An overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004, 75, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Aaronson, D.S.; Horvath, C.M. A road map for those who don’t know JAK-STAT. Science 2002, 296, 1653–1655. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Darnell, J.E., Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science 1997, 277, 1630–1635. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Leonard, W.J. Role of Jak kinases and STATs in cytokine signal transduction. Int. J. Hematol. 2001, 73, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Hebenstreit, D.; Horejs-Hoeck, J.; Duschl, A. JAK/STAT-dependent gene regulation by cytokines. Drug News Perspect. 2005, 18, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Kerr, I.M.; Costa-Pereira, A.P.; Lillemeier, B.F.; Strobl, B. Of JAKs, STATs, blind watchmakers, jeeps and trains. FEBS Lett. 2003, 546, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Greenhalgh, C.J.; Hilton, D.J. Negative regulation of cytokine signaling. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2001, 70, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Krebs, D.L.; Hilton, D.J. SOCS proteins: Negative regulators of cytokine signaling. Stem Cells 2001, 19, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Kim, D.J.; Tremblay, M.L.; Digiovanni, J. Protein tyrosine phosphatases, TC-PTP, SHP1, and SHP2, cooperate in rapid dephosphorylation of Stat3 in keratinocytes following UVB irradiation. PLoS One 2010, 5, e10290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Shuai, K. Regulation of cytokine signaling pathways by PIAS proteins. Cell Res. 2006, 16, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Faisst, S.; Meyer, S. Compilation of vertebrate-encoded transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Levy, D.E.; Lee, C.K. What does Stat3 do? J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 109, 1143–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bromberg, J.F.; Wrzeszczynska, M.H.; Devgan, G.; Zhao, Y.; Pestell, R.G.; Albanese, C.; Darnell, J.E., Jr. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell 1999, 98, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Otero, D.C.; Poli, V.; David, M.; Rickert, R.C. Cutting edge: Inherent and acquired resistance to radiation-induced apoptosis in B cells: A pivotal role for STAT3. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 6593–6597. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Hutchins, A.P.; Diez, D.; Miranda-Saavedra, D. Genomic and computational approaches to dissect the mechanisms of STAT3’s universal and cell type-specific functions. JAKSTAT 2013, 2, e25097. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Chang, Q.; Daly, L.; Bromberg, J. The IL-6 feed-forward loop: A driver of tumorigenesis. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. De la Iglesia, N.; Konopka, G.; Puram, S.V.; Chan, J.A.; Bachoo, R.M.; You, M.J.; Levy, D.E.; Depinho, R.A.; Bonni, A. Identification of a PTEN-regulated STAT3 brain tumor suppressor pathway. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 449–462. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bromberg, J. Stat proteins and oncogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 109, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Chumsri, S.; Shah, P. Radiation resistance of cancer stem cells as an obstacle in cancer therapy. Mol. Cell. Pharmacol. 2013, 5, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu, C.T.; Chen, M.F.; Chen, W.C.; Hsieh, C.C. The role of IL-6 in the radiation response of prostate cancer. Radiat. Oncol. 2013, 8, 159. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Li, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, X.; Di, B. Silencing STAT3 with short hairpin RNA enhances radiosensitivity of human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma xenografts in vivo. Exp. Ther. Med. 2010, 1, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Sun, L.; Cabarcas, S.M.; Farrar, W.L. Radioresistance and cancer stem cells: Survival of the fittest. J. Carcinog. Mutagen. 2011, S1, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  34. You, S.; Li, R.; Park, D.; Xie, M.; Sica, G.L.; Cao, Y.; Xiao, Z.Q.; Deng, X. Disruption of STAT3 by niclosamide reverses radioresistance of human lung cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Panni, R.Z.; Sanford, D.E.; Belt, B.A.; Mitchem, J.B.; Worley, L.A.; Goetz, B.D.; Mukherjee, P.; Wang-Gillam, A.; Link, D.C.; Denardo, D.G.; et al. Tumor-induced STAT3 activation in monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells enhances stemness and mesenchymal properties in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2014, 63, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Turkson, J.; Jove, R. STAT proteins: Novel molecular targets for cancer drug discovery. Oncogene 2000, 19, 6613–6626. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, X.; Crowe, P.J.; Goldstein, D.; Yang, J.L. STAT3 inhibition, a novel approach to enhancing targeted therapy in human cancers (review). Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 41, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Wen, P.Y.; Kesari, S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 492–507. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Siegel, R.; Naishadham, D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2013, 63, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Mrugala, M.M. Advances and challenges in the treatment of glioblastoma: A clinician’s perspective. Discov. Med. 2013, 15, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Tchirkov, A.; Rolhion, C.; Bertrand, S.; Dore, J.F.; Dubost, J.J.; Verrelle, P. IL-6 gene amplification and expression in human glioblastomas. Br. J. Cancer 2001, 85, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Birner, P.; Toumangelova-Uzeir, K.; Natchev, S.; Guentchev, M. STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation influences survival in glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 2010, 100, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Brantley, E.C.; Benveniste, E.N. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3: A molecular hub for signaling pathways in gliomas. Mol. Cancer Res. 2008, 6, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Zhou, H.; Miki, R.; Eeva, M.; Fike, F.M.; Seligson, D.; Yang, L.; Yoshimura, A.; Teitell, M.A.; Jamieson, C.A.; Cacalano, N.A. Reciprocal regulation of SOCS 1 and SOCS3 enhances resistance to ionizing radiation in glioblastoma multiforme. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 2344–2353. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Gao, L.; Li, F.; Dong, B.; Zhang, J.; Rao, Y.; Cong, Y.; Mao, B.; Chen, X. Inhibition of STAT3 and ErbB2 suppresses tumor growth, enhances radiosensitivity, and induces mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in glioma cells. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 77, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, Y.P.; Chang, Y.L.; Huang, P.I.; Chiou, G.Y.; Tseng, L.M.; Chiou, S.H.; Chen, M.H.; Chen, M.T.; Shih, Y.H.; Chang, C.H.; et al. Resveratrol suppresses tumorigenicity and enhances radiosensitivity in primary glioblastoma tumor initiating cells by inhibiting the STAT3 axis. J. Cell Physiol. 2012, 227, 976–993. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Chautard, E.; Loubeau, G.; Tchirkov, A.; Chassagne, J.; Vermot-Desroches, C.; Morel, L.; Verrelle, P. Akt signaling pathway: A target for radiosensitizing human malignant glioma. Neuro-oncology 2010, 12, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Patel, J.D.; Krilov, L.; Adams, S.; Aghajanian, C.; Basch, E.; Brose, M.S.; Carroll, W.L.; de Lima, M.; Gilbert, M.R.; Kris, M.G.; et al. Clinical cancer advances 2013: Annual report on progress against cancer from the American society of clinical oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 129–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Buchholz, T.A. Radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Hoover, S.; Bloom, E.; Patel, S. Review of breast conservation therapy: Then and now. ISRN Oncol. 2011, 2011, 617593. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Watson, C.J.; Miller, W.R. Elevated levels of members of the STAT family of transcription factors in breast carcinoma nuclear extracts. Br. J. Cancer 1995, 71, 840–844. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Garcia, R.; Yu, C.L.; Hudnall, A.; Catlett, R.; Nelson, K.L.; Smithgall, T.; Fujita, D.J.; Ethier, S.P.; Jove, R. Constitutive activation of Stat3 in fibroblasts transformed by diverse oncoproteins and in breast carcinoma cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1997, 8, 1267–1276. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Bowman, T.; Garcia, R.; Turkson, J.; Jove, R. STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2474–2488. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Page, C.; Huang, M.; Jin, X.; Cho, K.; Lilja, J.; Reynolds, R.K.; Lin, J. Elevated phosphorylation of AKT and Stat3 in prostate, breast, and cervical cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2000, 17, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Burke, W.M.; Jin, X.; Lin, H.J.; Huang, M.; Liu, R.; Reynolds, R.K.; Lin, J. Inhibition of constitutively active Stat3 suppresses growth of human ovarian and breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2001, 20, 7925–7934. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Kim, K.W.; Mutter, R.W.; Cao, C.; Albert, J.M.; Shinohara, E.T.; Sekhar, K.R.; Lu, B. Inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activity results in down-regulation of survivin following irradiation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 2659–2665. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Kang, Y.; Park, M.A.; Heo, S.W.; Park, S.Y.; Kang, K.W.; Park, P.H.; Kim, J.A. The radio-sensitizing effect of xanthohumol is mediated by STAT3 and EGFR suppression in doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1830, 2638–2648. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Cunningham, D.; Atkin, W.; Lenz, H.J.; Lynch, H.T.; Minsky, B.; Nordlinger, B.; Starling, N. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 2010, 375, 1030–1047. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Sauer, R.; Becker, H.; Hohenberger, W.; Rodel, C.; Wittekind, C.; Fietkau, R.; Martus, P.; Tschmelitsch, J.; Hager, E.; Hess, C.F.; et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1731–1740. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Rodel, C.; Hofheinz, R.; Liersch, T. Rectal cancer: State of the art in 2012. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2012, 24, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Spitzner, M.; Emons, G.; Kramer, F.; Gaedcke, J.; Rave-Frank, M.; Scharf, J.G.; Burfeind, P.; Becker, H.; Beissbarth, T.; Ghadimi, B.M.; et al. A gene expression signature for chemoradiosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 78, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Spitzner, M.; Roesler, B.; Bielfeld, C.; Emons, G.; Gaedcke, J.; Wolff, H.A.; Rave-Frank, M.; Kramer, F.; Beissbarth, T.; Kitz, J.; et al. STAT3 inhibition sensitizes colorectal cancer to chemoradiotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 134, 997–1007. [Google Scholar]
  63. Urick, M.E.; Chung, E.J.; Shield, W.P., 3rd; Gerber, N.; White, A.; Sowers, A.; Thetford, A.; Camphausen, K.; Mitchell, J.; Citrin, D.E. Enhancement of 5-fluorouracil-induced in vitro and in vivo radiosensitization with MEK inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5038–5047. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Enzinger, P.C.; Mayer, R.J. Esophageal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 2241–2252. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Pennathur, A.; Gibson, M.K.; Jobe, B.A.; Luketich, J.D. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet 2013, 381, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Chen, M.F.; Lu, M.S.; Lin, P.Y.; Chen, P.T.; Chen, W.C.; Lee, K.D. The role of DNA methyltransferase 3b in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2012, 118, 4074–4089. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, M.F.; Chen, P.T.; Lu, M.S.; Lin, P.Y.; Chen, W.C.; Lee, K.D. IL-6 expression predicts treatment response and outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Cooperberg, M.R.; Broering, J.M.; Carroll, P.R. Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Carter, H.B. Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2011, 108, 1684–1695. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. D’Amico, A.V.; Moul, J.; Carroll, P.R.; Sun, L.; Lubeck, D.; Chen, M.H. Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 2163–2172. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Mora, L. B.; Buettner, R.; Seigne, J.; Diaz, J.; Ahmad, N.; Garcia, R.; Bowman, T.; Falcone, R.; Fairclough, R.; Cantor, A.; et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 in human prostate tumors and cell lines: direct inhibition of Stat3 signaling induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 6659–6666. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Smith, Z.L.; Christodouleas, J.P.; Keefe, S.M.; Malkowicz, S.B.; Guzzo, T.J. Bladder preservation in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A review of the literature and a practical approach to therapy. BJU Int. 2013, 112, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Meeks, J.J.; Bellmunt, J.; Bochner, B.H.; Clarke, N.W.; Daneshmand, S.; Galsky, M.D.; Hahn, N.M.; Lerner, S.P.; Mason, M.; Powles, T.; et al. A systematic review of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2012, 62, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Sun, Y.; Cheng, M.K.; Griffiths, T.R.; Mellon, J.K.; Kai, B.; Kriajevska, M.; Manson, M.M. Inhibition of STAT signalling in bladder cancer by diindolylmethane: Relevance to cell adhesion, migration and proliferation. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2013, 13, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, C.L.; Cen, L.; Kohout, J.; Hutzen, B.; Chan, C.; Hsieh, F.C.; Loy, A.; Huang, V.; Cheng, G.; Lin, J. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation is associated with bladder cancer cell growth and survival. Mol. Cancer 2008, 7, 78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Barbera, L.; Thomas, G. Management of early and locally advanced cervical cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2009, 36, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Duenas-Gonzalez, A.; Zarba, J.J.; Patel, F.; Alcedo, J.C.; Beslija, S.; Casanova, L.; Pattaranutaporn, P.; Hameed, S.; Blair, J.M.; Barraclough, H.; et al. Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1678–1685. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Shukla, S.; Shishodia, G.; Mahata, S.; Hedau, S.; Pandey, A.; Bhambhani, S.; Batra, S.; Basir, S.F.; Das, B.C.; Bharti, A.C. Aberrant expression and constitutive activation of STAT3 in cervical carcinogenesis: Implications in high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 282. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Chen, H.H.; Chou, C.Y.; Wu, Y.H.; Hsueh, W.T.; Hsu, C.H.; Guo, H.R.; Lee, W.Y.; Su, W.C. Constitutive STAT5 activation correlates with better survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 82, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Fang, Z.H.; Li, Y.J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.J.; Zhu, L.H. Inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and cyclooxygenase-2 is involved in radiosensitization of cepharanthine in HeLa cells. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2013, 23, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Bernier, J.; Domenge, C.; Ozsahin, M.; Matuszewska, K.; Lefebvre, J.L.; Greiner, R.H.; Giralt, J.; Maingon, P.; Rolland, F.; Bolla, M.; et al. Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1945–1952. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Cooper, J.S.; Pajak, T.F.; Forastiere, A.A.; Jacobs, J.; Campbell, B.H.; Saxman, S.B.; Kish, J.A.; Kim, H.E.; Cmelak, A.J.; Rotman, M.; et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1937–1944. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Bernier, J.; Cooper, J.S. Chemoradiation after surgery for high-risk head and neck cancer patients: how strong is the evidence? Oncologist 2005, 10, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Song, J.I.; Grandis, J.R. STAT signaling in head and neck cancer. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2489–2495. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Markovic, A.; Chung, C.H. Current role of EGF receptor monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert. Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2012, 12, 1149–1159. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Lai, S.Y.; Johnson, F.M. Defining the role of the JAK-STAT pathway in head and neck and thoracic malignancies: Implications for future therapeutic approaches. Drug Resist. Updat. 2010, 13, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Hsiao, J.R.; Jin, Y.T.; Tsai, S.T.; Shiau, A.L.; Wu, C.L.; Su, W.C. Constitutive activation of STAT3 and STAT5 is present in the majority of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and correlates with better prognosis. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 89, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Kotoula, V.; Lambaki, S.; Televantou, D.; Kalogera-Fountzila, A.; Nikolaou, A.; Markou, K.; Misailidou, D.; Syrigos, K.N.; Fountzilas, G. STAT-Related Profiles are associated with patient response to targeted treatments in locally advanced SCCHN. Transl. Oncol. 2011, 4, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Masuda, M.; Suzui, M.; Yasumatu, R.; Nakashima, T.; Kuratomi, Y.; Azuma, K.; Tomita, K.; Komiyama, S.; Weinstein, I.B. Constitutive activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 correlates with cyclin D1 overexpression and may provide a novel prognostic marker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 3351–3355. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Chen, C.C.; Chen, W.C.; Lu, C.H.; Wang, W.H.; Lin, P.Y.; Lee, K.D.; Chen, M.F. Significance of interleukin-6 signaling in the resistance of pharyngeal cancer to irradiation and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 76, 1214–1224. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Chen, Y.W.; Chen, K.H.; Huang, P.I.; Chen, Y.C.; Chiou, G.Y.; Lo, W.L.; Tseng, L.M.; Hsu, H.S.; Chang, K.W.; Chiou, S.H. Cucurbitacin I suppressed stem-like property and enhanced radiation-induced apoptosis in head and neck squamous carcinoma—Derived CD44(+)ALDH1(+) cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 2879–2892. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Kruser, T.J.; Armstrong, E.A.; Ghia, A.J.; Huang, S.; Wheeler, D.L.; Radinsky, R.; Freeman, D.J.; Harari, P.M. Augmentation of radiation response by panitumumab in models of upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008, 72, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Li, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, X.; Di, B. STAT3 blockade with shRNA enhances radiosensitivity in Hep-2 human laryngeal squamous carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2010, 23, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Bonner, J.A.; Yang, E.S.; Trummell, H.Q.; Nowsheen, S.; Willey, C.D.; Raisch, K.P. Inhibition of STAT-3 results in greater cetuximab sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother. Oncol. 2011, 99, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Adachi, M.; Cui, C.; Dodge, C.T.; Bhayani, M.K.; Lai, S.Y. Targeting STAT3 inhibits growth and enhances radiosensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral. Oncol. 2012, 48, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Pan, Y.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, R.; Claret, F.X. Stat3 inhibitor Stattic exhibits potent antitumor activity and induces chemo- and radio-sensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One 2013, 8, e54565. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Goel, A.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin, the golden spice from Indian saffron, is a chemosensitizer and radiosensitizer for tumors and chemoprotector and radioprotector for normal organs. Nutr. Cancer 2010, 62, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Hsu, H.W.; Gridley, D.S.; Kim, P.D.; Hu, S.; de Necochea-Campion, R.; Ferris, R.L.; Chen, C.S.; Mirshahidi, S. Linifanib (ABT-869) enhances radiosensitivity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oral. Oncol. 2013, 49, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Achcar Rde, O.; Cagle, P.T.; Jagirdar, J. Expression of activated and latent signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in 303 non-small cell lung carcinomas and 44 malignant mesotheliomas: Possible role for chemotherapeutic intervention. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2007, 131, 1350–1360. [Google Scholar]
  100. Purnell, P.R.; Mack, P.C.; Tepper, C.G.; Evans, C.P.; Green, T.P.; Gumerlock, P.H.; Lara, P.N.; Gandara, D.R.; Kung, H.J.; Gautschi, O. The Src inhibitor AZD0530 blocks invasion and may act as a radiosensitizer in lung cancer cells. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2009, 4, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Sun, Y.; Moretti, L.; Giacalone, N.J.; Schleicher, S.; Speirs, C.K.; Carbone, D.P.; Lu, B. Inhibition of JAK2 signaling by TG101209 enhances radiotherapy in lung cancer models. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011, 6, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Lin, Y.C.; Hung, M.S.; Lin, C.K.; Li, J.M.; Lee, K.D.; Li, Y.C.; Chen, M.F.; Chen, J.K.; Yang, C.T. CK2 inhibitors enhance the radiosensitivity of human non-small cell lung cancer cells through inhibition of stat3 activation. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2011, 26, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Yin, Z.J.; Jin, F.G.; Liu, T.G.; Fu, E.Q.; Xie, Y.H.; Sun, R.L. Overexpression of STAT3 potentiates growth, survival, and radioresistance of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. J. Surg. Res. 2011, 171, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Hsu, H.S.; Huang, P.I.; Chang, Y.L.; Tzao, C.; Chen, Y.W.; Shih, H.C.; Hung, S.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Tseng, L.M.; Chiou, S.H. Cucurbitacin I inhibits tumorigenic ability and enhances radiochemosensitivity in nonsmall cell lung cancer-derived CD133-positive cells. Cancer 2011, 117, 2970–2985. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. De Gruijl, F.R.; van Kranen, H.J.; Mullenders, L.H. UV-induced DNA damage, repair, mutations and oncogenic pathways in skin cancer. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2001, 63, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Sano, S.; Itami, S.; Takeda, K.; Tarutani, M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Miura, H.; Yoshikawa, K.; Akira, S.; Takeda, J. Keratinocyte-specific ablation of Stat3 exhibits impaired skin remodeling, but does not affect skin morphogenesis. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 4657–4668. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  107. Kim, D.J.; Chan, K.S.; Sano, S.; Digiovanni, J. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) in epithelial carcinogenesis. Mol. Carcinog. 2007, 46, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  108. Sano, S.; Chan, K.S.; DiGiovanni, J. Impact of Stat3 activation upon skin biology: A dichotomy of its role between homeostasis and diseases. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2008, 50, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. Sano, S.; Chan, K.S.; Kira, M.; Kataoka, K.; Takagi, S.; Tarutani, M.; Itami, S.; Kiguchi, K.; Yokoi, M.; Sugasawa, K.; et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is a key regulator of keratinocyte survival and proliferation following UV irradiation. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 5720–5729. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Dzwierzynski, W.W. Managing malignant melanoma. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013, 132, 446e–460e. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  111. Johnson, G.E.; Ivanov, V.N.; Hei, T.K. Radiosensitization of melanoma cells through combined inhibition of protein regulators of cell survival. Apoptosis 2008, 13, 790–802. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  112. Bonner, J.A.; Trummell, H.Q.; Willey, C.D.; Plants, B.A.; Raisch, K.P. Inhibition of STAT-3 results in radiosensitization of human squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother. Oncol. 2009, 92, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Karras, J.G.; Wang, Z.; Huo, L.; Howard, R.G.; Frank, D.A.; Rothstein, T.L. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) is constitutively activated in normal, self-renewing B-1 cells but only inducibly expressed in conventional B lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 185, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar]
  114. Sugino, K.; Ito, K.; Mimura, T.; Nagahama, M.; Fukunari, N.; Kubo, A.; Iwasaki, H. The important role of operations in the management of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 2002, 131, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Zito, G.; Richiusa, P.; Bommarito, A.; Carissimi, E.; Russo, L.; Coppola, A.; Zerilli, M.; Rodolico, V.; Criscimanna, A.; Amato, M.; et al. In vitro identification and characterization of CD133(pos) cancer stem-like cells in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cell lines. PLoS One 2008, 3, e3544. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Tseng, L.M.; Huang, P.I.; Chen, Y.R.; Chen, Y.C.; Chou, Y.C.; Chen, Y.W.; Chang, Y.L.; Hsu, H.S.; Lan, Y.T.; Chen, K.H.; et al. Targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 pathway by cucurbitacin I diminishes self-renewing and radiochemoresistant abilities in thyroid cancer-derived CD133+ cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 341, 410–423. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  117. Huang, C.Y.; Lin, C.S.; Tai, W.T.; Hsieh, C.Y.; Shiau, C.W.; Cheng, A.L.; Chen, K.F. Sorafenib enhances radiation-induced apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting STAT3. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2013, 86, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Snyder, M.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhang, J.J. Identification of novel direct Stat3 target genes for control of growth and differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 3791–3798. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Haviland, R. Identification of novel STAT3 target genes associated with oncogenesis. PhD Thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  120. Timofeeva, O.A.; Tarasova, N.I.; Zhang, X.; Chasovskikh, S.; Cheema, A.K.; Wang, H.; Brown, M.L.; Dritschilo, A. STAT3 suppresses transcription of proapoptotic genes in cancer cells with the involvement of its N-terminal domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1267–1272. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Bourillot, P.Y.; Aksoy, I.; Schreiber, V.; Wianny, F.; Schulz, H.; Hummel, O.; Hubner, N.; Savatier, P. Novel STAT3 target genes exert distinct roles in the inhibition of mesoderm and endoderm differentiation in cooperation with Nanog. Stem Cells 2009, 27, 1760–1771. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. Courapied, S.; Sellier, H.; de Carne Trecesson, S.; Vigneron, A.; Bernard, A.C.; Gamelin, E.; Barre, B.; Coqueret, O. The cdk5 kinase regulates the STAT3 transcription factor to prevent DNA damage upon topoisomerase I inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 26765–26778. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  123. Barry, S.P.; Townsend, P.A.; Knight, R.A.; Scarabelli, T.M.; Latchman, D.S.; Stephanou, A. STAT3 modulates the DNA damage response pathway. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2010, 91, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. Ushijima, R.; Sakaguchi, N.; Kano, A.; Maruyama, A.; Miyamoto, Y.; Sekimoto, T.; Yoneda, Y.; Ogino, K.; Tachibana, T. Extracellular signal-dependent nuclear import of STAT3 is mediated by various importin alphas. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 330, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. Cimica, V.; Chen, H.C.; Iyer, J.K.; Reich, N.C. Dynamics of the STAT3 transcription factor: Nuclear import dependent on Ran and importin-beta1. PLoS One 2011, 6, e20188. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Ma, J.; Cao, X. Regulation of Stat3 nuclear import by importin alpha5 and importin alpha7 via two different functional sequence elements. Cell Signal. 2006, 18, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  127. Bhattacharya, S.; Schindler, C. Regulation of Stat3 nuclear export. J. Clin. Invest. 2003, 111, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  128. Gao, J.; McConnell, M.J.; Yu, B.; Li, J.; Balko, J.M.; Black, E.P.; Johnson, J.O.; Lloyd, M.C.; Altiok, S.; Haura, E.B. MUC1 is a downstream target of STAT3 and regulates lung cancer cell survival and invasion. Int. J. Oncol. 2009, 35, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  129. Kamran, M.Z.; Patil, P.; Gude, R.P. Role of STAT3 in cancer metastasis and translational advances. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 421821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  130. Priester, M.; Copanaki, E.; Vafaizadeh, V.; Hensel, S.; Bernreuther, C.; Glatzel, M.; Seifert, V.; Groner, B.; Kogel, D.; Weissenberger, J. STAT3 silencing inhibits glioma single cell infiltration and tumor growth. Neuro-oncology 2013, 15, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  131. Wu, Y.; Diab, I.; Zhang, X.; Izmailova, E.S.; Zehner, Z.E. Stat3 enhances vimentin gene expression by binding to the antisilencer element and interacting with the repressor protein, ZBP-89. Oncogene 2004, 23, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Colomiere, M.; Ward, A.C.; Riley, C.; Trenerry, M.K.; Cameron-Smith, D.; Findlay, J.; Ackland, L.; Ahmed, N. Cross talk of signals between EGFR and IL-6R through JAK2/STAT3 mediate epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ovarian carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 100, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  133. Avtanski, D.B.; Nagalingam, A.; Bonner, M.Y.; Arbiser, J.L.; Saxena, N.K.; Sharma, D. Honokiol inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells by targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3/Zeb1/E-cadherin axis. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 565–580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Ng, I.H.; Yeap, Y.Y.; Ong, L.S.; Jans, D.A.; Bogoyevitch, M.A. Oxidative stress impairs multiple regulatory events to drive persistent cytokine-stimulated STAT3 phosphorylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  135. Gough, D.J.; Sehgal, P.; Levy, D.E. Nongenomic functions of STAT3. In Jak-Stat Signaling: From Basics to Disease; Decker, T., Müller, M., Eds.; Springer Vienna: Vienna, Austria, 2012; pp. 91–98. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zouein, F.A.; Kurdi, M.; Booz, G.W. Dancing rhinos in stilettos: The amazing saga of the genomic and nongenomic actions of STAT3 in the heart. JAKSTAT 2013, 2, e24352. [Google Scholar]
  137. Wegrzyn, J.; Potla, R.; Chwae, Y.J.; Sepuri, N.B.; Zhang, Q.; Koeck, T.; Derecka, M.; Szczepanek, K.; Szelag, M.; Gornicka, A.; et al. Function of mitochondrial Stat3 in cellular respiration. Science 2009, 323, 793–797. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Meier, J.A.; Larner, A.C. Toward a new STATe: The role of STATs in mitochondrial function. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  139. Elschami, M.; Scherr, M.; Philippens, B.; Gerardy-Schahn, R. Reduction of STAT3 expression induces mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy in cardiac HL-1 cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 92, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  140. Yoon, S.; Woo, S.U.; Kang, J.H.; Kim, K.; Kwon, M.H.; Park, S.; Shin, H.J.; Gwak, H.S.; Chwae, Y.J. STAT3 transcriptional factor activated by reactive oxygen species induces IL6 in starvation-induced autophagy of cancer cells. Autophagy 2010, 6, 1125–1138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  141. Zhang, Q.; Raje, V.; Yakovlev, V.A.; Yacoub, A.; Szczepanek, K.; Meier, J.; Derecka, M.; Chen, Q.; Hu, Y.; Sisler, J.; et al. Mitochondrial localized Stat3 promotes breast cancer growth via phosphorylation of serine 727. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 31280–31288. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  142. Mackenzie, G.G.; Huang, L.; Alston, N.; Ouyang, N.; Vrankova, K.; Mattheolabakis, G.; Constantinides, P.P.; Rigas, B. Targeting mitochondrial STAT3 with the novel phospho-valproic acid (MDC-1112) inhibits pancreatic cancer growth in mice. PLoS One 2013, 8, e61532. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  143. Darnell, J.E., Jr. Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  144. Yue, P.; Turkson, J. Targeting STAT3 in cancer: How successful are we? Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2009, 18, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Mankan, A.K.; Greten, F.R. Inhibiting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3: Rationality and rationale design of inhibitors. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2011, 20, 1263–1275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  146. Nelson, E.A.; Sharma, S.V.; Settleman, J.; Frank, D.A. A chemical biology approach to developing STAT inhibitors: Molecular strategies for accelerating clinical translation. Oncotarget 2011, 2, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  147. Debnath, B.; Xu, S.; Neamati, N. Small molecule inhibitors of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) protein. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6645–6668. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  148. Reddy, M.M.; Deshpande, A.; Sattler, M. Targeting JAK2 in the therapy of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2012, 16, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  149. Harry, B.L.; Eckhardt, S.G.; Jimeno, A. JAK2 inhibition for the treatment of hematologic and solid malignancies. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2012, 21, 637–655. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  150. Sansone, P.; Bromberg, J. Targeting the interleukin-6/Jak/stat pathway in human malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  151. Laurie, S.A.; Goss, G.D.; Shepherd, F.A.; Reaume, M.N.; Nicholas, G.; Philip, L.; Wang, L.; Schwock, J.; Hirsh, V.; Oza, A.; et al. A phase II trial of saracatinib, an inhibitor of src kinases, in previously-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The princess margaret hospital phase II consortium. Clin. Lung Cancer 2014, 15, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  152. Johnson, F.M.; Saigal, B.; Talpaz, M.; Donato, N.J. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) tyrosine kinase inhibitor suppresses invasion and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 6924–6932. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  153. Guo, Y.; Xu, F.; Lu, T.; Duan, Z.; Zhang, Z. Interleukin-6 signaling pathway in targeted therapy for cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012, 38, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  154. NCT01066663, a phase I/II study of pyrimethamine, a STAT3 inhibitor, for the treatment of relapsed chronic lymphocytic Leukemia/small Lymphocytic Lymphoma. Available online: http://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 9 February 2010).
  155. NCT00529113, a randomized phase I/II study with gemcitabine and RTA 402 or gemcitabine and placebo for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Available online: http://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 12 September 2007).
  156. Hong, D.S.; Kurzrock, R.; Supko, J.G.; Lawrence, D.P.; Wheler, J.J.; Meyer, C.J.; Mier, J.W.; Andreeff, M.; Shapiro, G.I.; Dezube, B.J. Phase I trial with a novel oral NF-{kappa}B/STAT3 inhibitor RTA 402 in patients with solid tumors and lymphoid malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26 15S, 3517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  157. Meyer, S.C.; Levine, R.L. Molecular pathways: Molecular basis for sensitivity and resistance to JAK kinase inhibitors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 2051–2059. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  158. Guo, X.; Qiu, J.; Tu, T.; Yang, X.; Deng, L.; Anders, R.A.; Zhou, L.; Fu, Y.X. Induction of innate lymphoid cell-derived interleukin-22 by the transcription factor STAT3 mediates protection against intestinal infection. Immunity 2014, 40, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  159. Takeda, K.; Noguchi, K.; Shi, W.; Tanaka, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Yoshida, N.; Kishimoto, T.; Akira, S. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 3801–3804. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  160. Inghirami, G.; Chiarle, R.; Simmons, W.J.; Piva, R.; Schlessinger, K.; Levy, D.E. New and old functions of STAT3: A pivotal target for individualized treatment of cancer. Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 1131–1133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spitzner, M.; Ebner, R.; Wolff, H.A.; Ghadimi, B.M.; Wienands, J.; Grade, M. STAT3: A Novel Molecular Mediator of Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy. Cancers 2014, 6, 1986-2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers6041986

AMA Style

Spitzner M, Ebner R, Wolff HA, Ghadimi BM, Wienands J, Grade M. STAT3: A Novel Molecular Mediator of Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy. Cancers. 2014; 6(4):1986-2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers6041986

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spitzner, Melanie, Reinhard Ebner, Hendrik A. Wolff, B. Michael Ghadimi, Jürgen Wienands, and Marian Grade. 2014. "STAT3: A Novel Molecular Mediator of Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy" Cancers 6, no. 4: 1986-2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers6041986

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop