Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study for Resistance to Rhynchosporium in a Diverse Collection of Spring Barley Germplasm
Next Article in Special Issue
Genus Decalepis: Biology, Importance and Biotechnological Interventions
Previous Article in Journal
Waterlogging Stress Physiology in Barley
Previous Article in Special Issue
Secondary Metabolism and Plant Growth of Piper divaricatum (Piperaceae) Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Phosphorus Supplementation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Posttranscriptional Mechanism in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge Leaves in Response to Drought Stress Using Phosphoproteomics

1
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271000, China
2
Taishan Academy of Forestry Sciences, Tai’an 271000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2022, 12(4), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040781
Submission received: 28 January 2022 / Revised: 18 March 2022 / Accepted: 19 March 2022 / Published: 24 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Progress and Application Prospect of Medicinal Plants)

Abstract

:
Drought stress is a major constraint to the quality and production of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen). This study aimed to investigate the posttranslational molecular mechanisms in S. miltiorrhiza leaves in response to drought stress using quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis. S. miltiorrhiza plants were stressed by withholding water for two (moderate drought stress) and four weeks (high drought stress). Leaf samples were prepared with tandem mass tag labeling. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was performed for the quantitative phosphoproteomics. Bioinformatics methods were used to identify the phosphosites and phosphoproteins that had significantly changed phosphorylation levels upon drought stresses. A total of 119 common phosphoproteins were significantly changed by both high and moderate drought stresses. The phosphorylation levels of proteins related to protein processing, photosynthesis, RNA binding, and splicing were significantly changed upon high drought, not moderate drought. Additionally, we identified that the Ser phosphorylation levels of most proteins related to terpene metabolism and RNA splicing were regulated by drought stresses. The Ser and Thr phosphorylation levels of energy metabolism proteins (including FBA2/8, PPC4, and PPCC) and heat shock proteins (including HSP70 and HSP90) were upregulated by drought stresses. Our study showed the posttranscriptional mechanisms in S. miltiorrhiza leaves in response to drought stress.

1. Introduction

With the changing global climate, the occurrence of natural disasters that adversely affect crop production is becoming more frequent and intensive in many parts of the world. Osmotic stress caused by drought is a major constraint to crop yield. Drought is abiotic stress that has a devastating effect on crop production and quality [1,2]. In the face of drought conditions, plants have evolved a series of molecular and physiological responses and adaptation mechanisms to tolerate or reduce damages caused by this stressful condition [1,3]. The investigation of the underlying molecular mechanism in the plant in response to drought stress is of significance for improving crop yield.
Research in plant genomics and proteomics have been widely used to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms in response to abiotic stresses [4,5,6,7]. Some of the genes and proteins responsible for the increased tolerance and adaptation to drought stress have been identified [1,7,8]. The earliest stress-responsive changes in gene expression cannot accurately reflect the protein profiles in response to the same conditions because of the post-translational modifications of proteins [4,9]. Post-translational modifications, including monoubiquitination, glycosylation, and phosphorylation affect protein localization, stability, activity, and specific cellular responses [9,10,11]. Accordingly, the drought-stress responses in the plant could be controlled by post-translational modifications of protein.
Protein phosphorylation is a major and reversible post-translational modification that regulates almost all aspects of protein localization, processing, folding, function, stability, and activity. Recent research in plant phosphoproteomics have largely focused on the identification and characterization of phosphorylated proteins in response to stressful conditions [6,12,13,14]. The changed phosphorylation levels of proteins in response to stress conditions suggested that the post-translational phosphorylation is responsible for the increased adaption and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Recently, the large-scale phosphoproteomics analysis had been performed in model plants including Arabidopsis thaliana [15], rice [16], maize [6], and wheat [17], and non-model plants including Brachypodium distachyon [18], Ammopiptanthus mongolicus [12], and pepper [19]. However, there is far less study of phosphoproteomics focusing on Salvia miltiorrhiza.
S. miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen in Chinese) is one of the most important and popular traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). It is used as a golden herbal medicine for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and ischemia [20,21]. Its water-soluble phenolic acids are of significant bioactivities including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and health-promoting activities [21]. Due to its great and significant medicinal values, the social and clinical demand for S. miltiorrhiza is increasing gradually. Several studies have shown that drought stress affects the growth and accumulation of active constituents in S. miltiorrhiza [22]. However, little is known about the underlying phosphoproteomics mechanism in S. miltiorrhiza upon drought stress.
In this study, a quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis was applied to reveal the response of S. miltiorrhiza leaves to drought stress. The liquid chromotography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis identified a large number of phosphorylation sites and proteins that were involved in the responsive mechanism to drought stress in S. miltiorrhiza leaves. The related comprehensive mechanism and pathways of phosphoproteins that had significantly changed phosphorylation level upon drought stress would be fully discussed.

2. Results

2.1. Morphology Change in S. miltiorrhiza Leaves in Response to Drought Stress

The significant changes in the morphology of S. miltiorrhiza plants in response to drought stress are presented in Figure 1. After 2-weeks (MD) and 4-weeks (HD) withholding of water, S. miltiorrhiza plants were slightly and severely wilting, respectively. The older leaves in the MD group were beginning to shrivel at the end of treatment. In the HD group, S. miltiorrhiza leaves were almost dried up, and the youngest leaves were beginning to shrivel.

2.2. Phosphorylation Motifs in the Phosphopeptides

The changes in the phosphoproteins in the youngest leaves were detected using LC-MS/MS and MaxQuant analyses, which resulted in the identification of 9309 phosphosites in 3341 proteins, among which 7354 phosphosites in 2904 proteins contained quantitative information. The prediction of motif specificity of these 7354 phosphosites showed that there were 69 phosphorylation-based motifs with serine (S) residues, threonine (T) residues, and tyrosine (Y) residues. Among the 69 motifs, nine had motif scores higher than 32. Six motifs including [pSDDD], [pSPxR], [pSPK], [pSPxR], [pSxG], and [pSxD] are presented in Figure 2A. The frequency of the amino acids flanking the phosphorylation sites (Ser and Thr) was evaluated (Figure 2B,C). The P amino acid at the + 1 position and the R amino acid at the +2 position had the highest frequency of phosphorylation for both sites. The high frequencies of D (aspartic acid), E (glutamine), K (lysine), P (proline), R (arginine), and S positions were observed in the flanking sequence (−6~+6) of Ser phosphorylation site (Figure 2B).

2.3. Identification of Significantly Changed Phosphopeptides and Phosphoproteins in S. miltiorrhiza Leaves upon Drought Stresses

After filtering phosphorylation sites (phosphosites) with localization probability of lower than 0.75 and data normalization, a total of 7440 phosphosites in 3089 proteins were retained, among which 2209 (71.51%), 425 (13.76%), 197 (6.38%), 138 (4.47%), and 58 (1.88%) proteins were phosphorylated at the Ser, Ser&Thr, Thr, Ser&Tyr, and Ser&Thr&Tyr residues, respectively (Figure 3A). According to the thresholds of |fold change| >1.5 and p < 0.05, a total of 859 and 192 phosphosites and 576 and 149 proteins had significantly changed phosphorylation levels in response to high drought (HD) and moderate drought (MD) stress, respectively (Figure 3B). A Venn diagram showed that there were 604 proteins, including 119 proteins common to HD and MD stresses (Figure 3C). The distinct expression profiles of 604 phosphoproteins are presented in Figure S2. Subcellular localization analysis showed that these proteins were mainly located in the nucleus (34.8% and 34.1%, respectively), chloroplast (29.1% and 31.07%), and cytoplasm (17.2% and 18.0%; Figure 3D). Protein domain analysis showed that the phosphoproteins had a significant increase in phosphorylation level upon HD stress and had PB1 domain, C2 domain, EF-hand domain, and major facilitator superfamily domain (Figure 3E). Decreased phosphoproteins had P-loop and AIG1-type guanine nucleotide-binding domains. In comparison with MD stress, the phosphoproteins that had significantly decreased phosphorylation level upon HD stress possessed heat shock protein 70 kDa (HSP70) C-terminal and peptide-binding domains. These results showed that phosphoproteins with significantly decreased and increased phosphorylation had different functions in S. miltiorrhiza leaves upon drought stress.

2.4. Functional Classification of Significantly Changed Phosphoproteins in S. miltiorrhiza Leaves upon Drought Stresses

Functional enrichment analysis showed that the significantly changed phosphoproteins upon HD stress were mainly concentrated in KEGG pathways including “carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms” (sly00710) and “spliceosome” (sly03040), while MD stress-changed phosphoproteins were associated with “photosynthesis” (sly00195; Figure 4A). Phosphoproteins with increased phosphorylation upon HD and MD stresses were enriched in sly00710, “protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum” (sly04141), and “photosynthesis-antenna proteins” (sly00196; Figure 4B). The phosphoproteins with significantly decreased phosphorylation upon HD and MD stress were associated with sly00195 and sly03040, respectively. The MD stress significantly decreased the phosphorylation levels of proteins related to sly00195 and sly01100 but upregulated the phosphorylation levels of proteins related to sly03040. The HD stress upregulated the phosphorylation levels of proteins related to sly00710, sly04141, sly00196, and “Carbon metabolism” compared with MD stress (sly01200; Figure 4B).

2.5. Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) Network of Phosphoproteins in S. miltiorrhiza Leaves upon Drought Stress

The PPI network derived from significantly phosphorylated proteins upon HD stress consisted of 126 proteins which were mainly clustered into six subsets (Figure 5). The largest subset consisted of 24 proteins, including serine/arginine-rich splicing factors (SR30, SR40, SR34A, and RSZ22) and DExH-box ATP-dependent RNA helicases (RH40, RH56, and RH3). These proteins were related to nucleic acid binding, RNA processing, “RNA degradation” (sly03018), and sly03040. Another subset consisted of one significantly decreased phosphoprotein and 16 significantly increased phosphoproteins, including several heat shock proteins (HSPs), including HSP90B, HSP70, HSP70-HSP90 organizing protein 3 (HOP3), HSFB2B that were centered on HSP70, a probable mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 37e (MED37E) and other chaperones. These proteins were related to response to stress/stimulus, protein folding, sly04141, and sly03040.
The PPI network consisting of the 119 phosphoproteins common to HD and MD stresses contained 94 phosphoproteins (Figure S3) and three major subsets which were related to sly01200, sly03010, sly00196, sly03040, and sly04141.

2.6. Phosphorylation Motifs of Significantly Changed Phosphoproteins in the PPI Network

The phosphorylation-based motifs in the significantly changed phosphoproteins in the PPI network were identified and listed in Table 1. Motifs of [pSPxR], [pSxD], and [pSxG] were identified in 10, nine and eight proteins, respectively. The At1g56130 (a LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase), HSP70, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 8 (FBA8), and FAB2 proteins had increased phosphorylation levels in the [pSxG] motif. Ribosomal proteins and splicing factors had diverse and different phosphorylation motifs (Table 1). The RSZ22 protein had [pSPR] motif, and the SCL30A and U2AF35B proteins contained a [pSPxR] motif.

2.7. Phosphorylation Profiles of Proteins Related to Terpenoid and Phenols Metabolism

Proteins related to terpenoid metabolism were selected from the literature. The phosphorylation levels of the phosphoproteins related to terpenoid metabolism are presented in Figure 6A. The phosphorylated levels of the Ser, Thr, or Tyr sites of proteins 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase 2 (DXS2), isoprenylcysteine alpha-carbonyl methylesterase 1 (ICMEL1), and alpha-trehalose-phosphate synthase 8 (TPS8), Cytochrome P450 83B1 (CYP83B1) were reduced by drought stresses, and those of proteins TPS7, TPS11, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase-like 7 (4CLL7), Geraniol dehydrogenase 1 (GEDH1), and an uncharacterized protein (SMil_00019164) were increased by drought stress. The phosphorylation level of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) was increased by MD stress and that of (+)-larreatricin hydroxylase (LH) was decreased by HD and MD stresses (Figure 6A). Additionally, the phosphorylation levels of several members of transcription factor families MYB, bHLH, and MYC that were related to terpenoid and phenol metabolisms were changed upon drought stress (Figure 6B). These results indicated that the terpenoid metabolism in S. miltiorrhiza leaves might be regulated by drought stress.

2.8. Phosphorylation Profiles of Other Characteristic Proteins

At last, we identified the phosphorylation profiles of proteins related to energy metabolism, processing in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and RNA splicing (Figure 7A–C). The phosphorylation levels of most splicing factors, including RH56, RH3, SR30, SC35, SR34A, and RSZ22, were decreased or increased at the Ser or Tyr sites by drought stress (Figure 7A). For instance, the RSZ22 factor had increased Ser or Tyr phosphorylation levels upon drought stress (Figure 7A). Additionally, the phosphorylation levels of most metabolic proteins (Figure 7B) and HSPs (Figure 7C) had the highest phosphorylation level upon HD stress.

3. Discussion

S. miltiorrhiza is one of the most important and popular plants used in TCM. Research showed that drought stress significantly changed the growth of shoot and root, the shoot/root ratio, and the accumulation of active constituents in S. miltiorrhiza [22]. After withholding water for two weeks, the leaves of S. miltiorrhiza were slightly wilted and only older leaves were beginning to shrivel. After four weeks of withholding water, S. miltiorrhiza leaves were almost dried up, and the youngest leaves were beginning to shrivel. These results showed that drought treatment affected the normal growth of S. miltiorrhiza. To illustrate the physiological and phosphoproteomic changes in S. miltiorrhiza leaves upon drought stresses, LC-MS/MS proteomics technology was used in this study. It is expected to infer the molecular mechanism of S. miltiorrhiza in response to drought stress from the level of phosphoproteomics.

3.1. Phosphoproteins Involved in Carbon Metabolism and Energy Metabolism

Drought stress-induced inhibition in plant growth is mediated by various biological processes, including changes in morphology and molecular metabolism. Upon drought stress, plants can alleviate drought stress-induced injury by increasing the synthetic utilization of carbohydrates, which need to consume a lot of energy. A subset of the significantly changed phosphoproteins in S. miltiorrhiza leaves upon drought stress was enriched in carbon and carbohydrates metabolism, including PPC4, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 2 (PPCC), FBA2, FBA8, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCKA/PEPCK).
PCKA is highly expressed in response to cadmium stress [23,24]. PEPC catalyzes the irreversible conversion from β-carboxylation of phosphoenolpyruvate to oxaloacetate. PPC4 is involved in pyruvate metabolism. It converts pyruvate to oxaloacetate and promotes the synthesis of specific amino acids including glutamic acid and aspartic acid [25]. In addition, PPC4 is involved in the synthesis of malate. Both glutamic acid and malate were preferentially accumulated in plant cells under drought stress [3,26]. Gregory et al. [27] previously reported that phosphorylation activation of PPC1 in A. thaliana contributed to the metabolic adaptation to nutritional P(i) deprivation. We showed that high drought stress phosphorylated the PPC4 and PPCC proteins at the Ser and/or Thr site. However, the phosphorylation levels of PCKA Thr and Ser sites were decreased by drought stresses, especially the high drought stress. The changed phosphorylation levels of these proteins at different phosphorylation sites upon drought stress demonstrated that the energy metabolism in S. miltiorrhiza leaves was changed upon drought stress.

3.2. Phosphoproteins Involved in RNA Transport, Binding, and Splicing

Some studies have shown that the RNA-binding, chloroplast-transported DEAD-box RNA helicases (ATP-dependent), including RH53, RH58, RH3, and RH40 are involved in responses to many stresses and have the characteristics of multi-effects [28,29]. Existing studies have shown that the key of DEAD-box helicases in the regulation of cell stress resistance is that they can untwist the secondary structure of mRNA formed at 5′UTR and restore the linear structure of mRNA upon stresses, so as to promote their efficient translation [30,31]. Several studies also confirmed the roles of DEAD-box helicase genes in the splicing of Group II intron-containing RNAs from chloroplast in Arabidopsis [32,33,34]. The increased transcript levels of DEAD-box helicases by stresses contribute to the synthesis of intracellular membrane-bounded organelles which ultimately enhance resistance to drought, salt, low temperature, and heat stress [8,29,35]. Accordingly, these genes are candidate targets for the comprehensive improvement of crop stress resistance [8,36].
Studies confirmed the roles of DEAD-box helicase genes, including AtRH3 in splicing of Group II intron-containing RNAs from chloroplast and large submit maturation of plastid ribosome in Arabidopsis [32,33,34]. For instance, the depletion of DEAD-box helicase genes impaired chloroplast and ribosome splicing [34]. Alternative splicing is an essential step for the function and maturation of mRNA from precursors by the spliceosome to remove non-coding intron sequences. The splicing complexes contain RNA small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex (snRNP) and a variety of factors including pre-mRNA-processing factor, pre-mRNA-splicing factor, and splicing factors [37,38]. Splicing factors are involved in most stress and regulating the mechanism of environmental fitness and responses [39,40]. These factors affect the stability, transcription, and splicing of a subset of genes and plant rhythm [41,42]. In the present study, the phosphorylation levels of several serine/arginine-rich splicing factors including RSZ22, RS40, SCL30A, and SR34A were increased or decreased in S. miltiorrhiza leaves upon drought stress. These results demonstrated that drought stress changed the stability, transcription, and splicing of genes in S. miltiorrhiza leaves.

3.3. Phosphoproteins Involved in Processing in ER

HSPs are molecular chaperons composed of five families with a high affinity for unrolled or misfolded polypeptide chains. HSPs are responsible for protecting cells against stress and conferring abiotic stress tolerance [43]. Their main function is to stabilize protein folding and prevent protein denaturation and aggregation caused by environmental stimuli [44,45]. HSPs associated with some molecules that are involved in signalings, like MAPK, Raf1, Akt, and calcium signaling [44]. In addition, HSP phosphorylation controls the expression of its target proteins and regulates the stress responses [46,47,48]. The phosphorylated HPS70 was reported to have decreased ATPase and refolding activity, and thus inhibited eukaryotic protein synthesis in yeast [49]. We confirmed that the phosphorylation levels of HSPs at the Ser residues were increased in S. miltiorrhiza leaves upon drought stress. The results of the increased Ser phosphorylation level of the HSPs indicated the upregulation of them in S. miltiorrhiza leaves in response to drought stress.

3.4. Phosphoproteins Associated with Terpenoid and Phenols Metabolisms

Enzymes related to terpenoid metabolism were identified from the phosphorylated proteins in S. miltiorrhiza leaves upon drought stress, including DXS2, Copal-8-ol diphosphate hydratase, chloroplastic (CPS), 4CLL7, GEDH1, and ICMEL1 [50,51]. Additionally, the members of transcription factor families which were related to the biosynthesis of terpenoids in S. miltiorrhiza leaves were identified, including bHLH, MYC, and MYB members [51,52,53]. Enzymes including TPS, DXS2, CPS, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGR) were essential for the mevalonic acid (MVA) and 2-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (methylerythritol phosphate, MEP) pathways of terpenoid synthesis in plants [53,54,55]. For instance, TPSs act as metabolic gatekeepers in the evolution of terpenoid chemical diversity [56]. CPS controls the conversion from geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate to cobaki pyrophosphate and its inhibition suppresses the accumulation of tanshinones I and IIA [57]. The accumulation of terpenoids is regulated by the activities of these enzymes [54].
In addition, the overexpression of bHLH and MYB members, including SmbHLH148, SmbHLH10, SmMYC2a, SmMYB9b, and SmMYB36, enhances tanshinones or phenolic acids biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza [52,53,58,59,60]. Our present study identified that the Ser-phosphorylation levels of DXS2, MYC2, and bHLH128 were significantly decreased by drought stress. However, the Ser phosphorylation levels of 4CLL7, FOR1, GEDH1, MYB330, and bHLH130 proteins were slightly increased by drought stress. DXS2 is a key enzyme of the tanshinone biosynthesis pathway regulating the synthesis of tanshinones and terpenoids [61]. The decreased Ser-phosphorylation level of DXS2 might demonstrate the inhibition of tanshinone and terpenoid synthesis and accumulation in S. miltiorrhiza leaf.
In this present study, we demonstrated the different phosphorylation levels of proteins in S. miltiorrhiza leaves in response to drought stress. Among the phosphoproteins identified, the phosphorylation levels of proteins related to energy metabolism (including FBA2, FBA8, PCKA, and PPCC), RNA splicing (including RH5, RH6, and RSZ22), and terpenoid metabolism (including TPS7, DXS2, and bHLH transcription factors) were significantly changed in S. miltiorrhiza leaves upon drought stress, especially by high drought stress. Most of these proteins were phosphorylated at the Ser, Thr, and Tyr sites. This study highlighted the posttranscriptional mechanisms in S. miltiorrhiza leaves in response to drought stress.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Planting of S. miltiorrhiza and Drought Treatment

S. miltiorrhiza seeds were obtained from the experimental base of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China. The seeds were planted in plastic basins (12 cm × 10 cm) fulfilling matrix soil (dark loessial soil:sand:earthworm dung = 3:1:1) Experiments were performed in a laboratory under the cultivation conditions: 300 mol·m−2·s−1 of illumination intensity, a 16:8 h light: dark cycle and a 65% relative humidity. After 20 days of seedling emergence, thinning was carried out and one seedling with a consistent growth state was selected from each pot. After 60 days of seedling emergence, S. miltiorrhiza plants with a consistent growth state were selected and subjected to drought treatment. The stimulation of MD and HD stress was performed by simply withholding water for two and four weeks, respectively (Figure S1). Plants in the control group were treated with normal watering.
Each treatment was performed in triplicate with 10 plants of each replication. On the same day of the last watering, the plants of S. miltiorrhiza were photographed, and the young leaves were collected from three plants of each replication for each treatment/group. All the leaf samples were snapped in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C before extraction of protein.

4.2. Protein Extraction

Before protein extraction, an equal amount of leaf samples of each replication were pooled, and three samples for each treatment were prepared accordingly. Leaf samples were milled in liquid nitrogen and transferred into centrifuge tubes. Samples were diluted in lysis buffer (8 M urea, 1% Triton-100, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1% protease inhibitor, 1% phosphatase inhibitors, and 2 mM EDTA; 1:4 v/v) and treated with sonication using a high-intensity ultrasonic processor (Scientz, Biotechnology, Ningbo, China) for three times. The remaining debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,000× g at 4 °C for 10 min. Finally, the protein in the supernatant was precipitated in 20% of precooling trichloroacetic acid for 2 h at 4 °C and centrifuged at 12,000× g 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and protein precipitate was washed with precooling acetone three times. Protein samples were dissolved in urea (8 M) and the quantitative detection of protein concentration was performed using a bicinchoninic acid kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.3. Trypsin Digestion and Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) Labeling

Before digestion, the protein solution was incubated with dithiothreitol (5 mM; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, LA, USA) for 30 min at 56 °C, and alkylated with iodoacetamide (11 mM; Sigma-Aldrich) in dark for 15 min at room temperature. Then, tetraethylammonium bromide (TEAB, 100 mM; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to dilute protein, which was then subjected to two-step digestion (1: 50 ratio of trypsin to protein overnight and 1:100 ratio of trypsin to protein for 4 h). The desalination of the peptide was conducted using a Strata X C18 SPE column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). After being vacuum-dried, the peptide was dissolved in TEAB (0.5 M; Sigma-Aldrich) and labeled using a TMT labeling kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Finally, peptides were fractionated into 60 fractions by high pH reverse-phase HPLC using Thermo Betasil C18 column (5 μm particles, 10 mm ID, and 250 mm length) with a gradient of 8%~32% acetonitrile over 60 min. Then, the peptides were combined into 6 fractions and vacuum-dried.

4.4. Affinity Enrichment

Affinity enrichment of peptide was performed as previously reported [62]. In brief, peptide solutions were incubated with immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) microspheres suspension with vibration in loading buffer (50% acetonitrile/6% trifluoroacetic acid) and enriched phosphopeptides were collected by centrifugation, and the supernatant was removed. The IMAC microspheres were washed with loading buffer (50% acetonitrile/6% trifluoroacetic acid and 30% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) to remove nonspecifically adsorbed peptides. Next, the enriched phosphopeptides were eluted from IMAC microspheres by vibration using elution buffer containing 10% NH4OH. The supernatant containing phosphopeptides was collected and lyophilized for LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.5. LC-MS/MS Analysis

For LC-MS/MS analysis, peptides were dissolved in 0.1% formic acid (solvent A), separated by an EASY-nLC 1000 ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system (Proxeon Biosystems, now Thermo Scientific) using a four-step linear gradient of 6% to 23% buffer B (98% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid; a flow rate of 350 nL/min) in 26 min, 23% to 35% in 8 min, and climbing to 80% in 3 min, and then holding at 80% for the last 3 min. A last, the separated peptides were subjected to MS/MS in Q ExactiveTM Plus (Thermo) coupled online to the UPLC. For MS analysis, the electrospray voltage was set at 2.0 kV. The m/z scan range was 350 to 1800 for a full scan. The intact peptides were detected at a resolution of 70,000 at 100 m/z and the fragments were detected at a resolution of 17,500 at 100 m/z. The duration of dynamic exclusion was 15.0 s Automatic gain control was set at 5 × 104.

4.6. Database Search

MS/MS spectra were processed using MaxQuant (v.1.5.2.8; http://www.maxquant.org/ accessed on 13 May 2019) on and searched against the National Data Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China (http://www.ndctcm.org/ accessed on 13 May 2019). Protein identification was conducted following the criteria: precursor ion mass tolerances = 20 ppm in first search and 5 ppm in main search; mass tolerance for fragment ions = 0.05 Da; enzyme = trypsin; missing cleavage = 4; fixed modification: carbamidomethyl (C) on Cys; variable modification: oxidation (M), phosphorylation (S/T/Y). The false discovery rate threshold for peptide and protein identification was set at <1%. The minimum peptide length was set to 40. Phosphosites with a localization probability of larger than 0.75 were retained and used for later analysis.

4.7. Bioinformatics Analysis

Significant changes in phosphorylation levels were identified with the criteria of fold change >1.5 or <1/1.5 and p < 0.05 (two-tailed T-test). The distinct expression of proteins with significant changes in phosphorylation levels was presented using heatmap clustering by R Package pheatmap (v.2.0.3; https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cluster/ accessed on 13 May 2019). The phosphorylation motifs and its specificity were extracted using the Motif-X algorithm in MoMo (V5.0.2; http://meme-suite.org/tools/momo accessed on 13 May 2019) with the criteria of peptide length = 21, occurrence = 20, and p-value < 0.000001. The Gene Ontology functional enrichment of the identified proteins and protein domain annotation was performed using InterProScan (v.5.14-53.0; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ accessed on 13 May 2019). KEGG pathways that related to proteins were identified using KAAS (v.2.0; http://www.genome.jp/kaas-bin/kaas_main accessed on 13 May 2019) and KEGG Mapper (v2.5; http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/mapper.html accessed on 13 May 2019). The subcellular localization was predicted using WolfPsort (http://wolfpsort.org accessed on 13 May 2019). Gene Ontology biological processes and KEGG pathways that relate to the proteins with significant changes in phosphorylation levels were predicted with the threshold of p < 0.05. The PPI networks were identified in the online available program STRING (http://string-db.org/ accessed on 13 May 2019). Interactions with confidence score > 0.7 (high confidence) were retained and used for the construction of the PPI network using the networkD3 of R package (v.0.4 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/networkD3/ accessed on 13 May 2019). The protein names were presented by the Protein accession number in STRING, or protein names or locus numbers in Arabidopsis thaliana (http://www.arabidopsis.org accessed on 13 May 2019).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy12040781/s1, Figure S1. The schematic diagram of the experimental design and process in this study. * notes the date of sampling. MD and HD indicate moderate and high drought stress, respectively. CK, control. Figure S2. The distinct expression profiles of the proteins had significant changes in the phosphorylation level upon drought stresses. MD and HD indicate moderate and high drought stress, respectively. CK, control. Figure S3. The protein-protein interaction network of significantly changed phosphoproteins upon high versus moderate drought stress. Blue and orange color notes phosphoproteins with significantly increased and decreased phosphorylation levels, respectively. Node size presents the interaction degree. The larger the node, the higher the degree of interaction is. The three gray circles present the protein subsets with different functional classifications (red word).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.Z. and J.W.; Methodology: J.Z. and J.L.; Software and formal Analysis: J.Z., Y.S. and J.L.; Investigation: Y.S. and Z.S.; Resources and data curation: J.Z. and J.L.; Writing-original draft preparation: J.Z.; Writing—review & editing: Z.S., Y.S. and J.W.; Funding acquisition: Z.S. and J.W.; Supervision: J.W. Project administration: J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872949), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2019HM081), the Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province (2019LYXZ021; 2017CXGC1302), Shandong modern agricultural industry technical system project (SDAIT-20-04), and National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1702705).

Data Availability Statement

Raw data is available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

4CLL74-coumarate-CoA ligase-like 7
DXS21-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase 2
FBAfructose-bisphosphate aldolase
FCfold change
FDRfalse discovery rate
GEDH1Geraniol dehydrogenase 1
HDhigh drought
HMGR3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase
HSPsheat shock proteins
ICMEL1isoprenylcysteine alpha-carbonyl methylesterase 1
IMACimmobilized metal affinity chromatography
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
LC-MS/MSliquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
MDmoderate drought
MEP2-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate
MS/MStandem mass spectrometry
MVAmevalonic acid
PCKA/PEPCKphosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
PPCCphosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 2
PPIprotein-protein interaction
TPSalpha-trehalose-phosphate synthase

References

  1. Lisar, S.Y.; Bakhshayeshan-Agdam, H.; Li, X.; Liu, F.; Burgess, P.; Huang, B.; Merewitz, E.; Zivcak, M.; Brestic, M.; Sytar, O.; et al. Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; Volume 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zampieri, M.; Ceglar, A.; Dentener, F.; Toreti, A. Wheat yield loss attributable to heat waves, drought and water excess at the global, national and subnational scales. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 064008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qu, X.; Wang, H.; Chen, M.; Liao, J.; Yuan, J.; Niu, G. Drought Stress–induced Physiological and Metabolic Changes in Leaves of Two Oil Tea Cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 144, 439–447. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chintakovid, N.; Maipoka, M.; Phaonakrop, N.; Mickelbart, M.V.; Roytrakul, S.; Chadchawan, S. Proteomic analysis of drought-responsive proteins in rice reveals photosynthesis-related adaptations to drought stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017, 39, 240. [Google Scholar]
  5. Das, A.; Eldakak, M.; Paudel, B.; Kim, D.-W.; Hemmati, H.; Basu, C.; Rohila, J.S. Leaf proteome analysis reveals prospective drought and heat stress response mechanisms in soybean. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6021047. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu, X.; Wu, L.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, D.; Li, N.; Zhu, G.; Li, C.; Wang, W. Phosphoproteomic analysis of the response of maize leaves to drought, heat and their combination stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 298. [Google Scholar]
  7. Iquebal, M.A.; Sharma, P.; Jasrotia, R.S.; Jaiswal, S.; Kaur, A.; Saroha, M.; Angadi, U.; Sheoran, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, G. RNAseq analysis reveals drought-responsive molecular pathways with candidate genes and putative molecular markers in root tissue of wheat. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13917. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nawaz, G.; Kang, H. Rice OsRH58, a chloroplast DEAD-box RNA helicase, improves salt or drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis by affecting chloroplast translation. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 17. [Google Scholar]
  9. Webster, D.E.; Thomas, M.C. Post-translational modification of plant-made foreign proteins; glycosylation and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sandalio, L.M.; Gotor, C.; Romero, L.C.; Romero-Puertas, M.C. Multilevel regulation of peroxisomal proteome by post-translational modifications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4881. [Google Scholar]
  11. Serrano, I.; Campos, L.; Rivas, S. Roles of E3 ubiquitin-ligases in nuclear protein homeostasis during plant stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 139. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sun, H.; Xia, B.; Wang, X.; Gao, F.; Zhou, Y. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis provides insight into the response to short-term drought stress in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2158. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rampitsch, C. Phosphoproteomics Analysis for Probing Plant Stress Tolerance. In Plant Stress Tolerance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 181–193. [Google Scholar]
  14. Waterworth, W.M.; Wilson, M.; Wang, D.; Nuhse, T.; Warward, S.; Selley, J.; West, C.E. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals plant DNA damage signalling pathways with a functional role for histone H2 AX phosphorylation in plant growth under genotoxic stress. Plant J. 2019, 100, 1007–1021. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Marondedze, C.; Groen, A.J.; Thomas, L.; Lilley, K.S.; Gehring, C. A quantitative phosphoproteome analysis of cGMP-dependent cellular responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 621–623. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chitteti, B.R.; Peng, Z. Proteome and phosphoproteome differential expression under salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa) roots. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 1718–1727. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lv, D.-W.; Ge, P.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, Z.-W.; Li, X.-H.; Yan, Y.-M. Integrative network analysis of the signaling cascades in seedling leaves of bread wheat by large-scale phosphoproteomic profiling. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 2381–2395. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yuan, L.-L.; Zhang, M.; Yan, X.; Bian, Y.-W.; Zhen, S.-M.; Yan, Y.-M. Dynamic phosphoproteome analysis of seedling leaves in Brachypodium distachyon L. reveals central phosphorylated proteins involved in the drought stress response. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35280. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, Z.; Lv, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, W.; Song, J.; Yang, B.; Tan, F.; Zou, X. Comprehensive Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Pepper Fruit Development Provides Insight into Plant Signaling Transduction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Z.-M.; Xu, S.-W.; Liu, P.-Q. Salvia miltiorrhiza Burge (Danshen): A golden herbal medicine in cardiovascular therapeutics. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018, 39, 802–824. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shi, M.; Huang, F.; Deng, C.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G. Bioactivities, biosynthesis and biotechnological production of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 953–964. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Zou, Z.; Liang, Z. Effect of drought stress on growth and accumulation of active constituents in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 84–88. [Google Scholar]
  23. Willick, I.R.; Plaxton, W.C.; Lolle, S.J.; Macfie, S.M. Transcriptional and post-translational upregulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in Arabidopsis thaliana (L. Heynh) under cadmium stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 164, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Waseem Awan, M.M.; Ahmad, F. The phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene family identification and expression analysis under abiotic and phytohormone stresses in Solanum lycopersicum L. Gene 2019, 690, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sánchez, R.; Flores, A.; Cejudo, F.J. Arabidopsis phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase genes encode immunologically unrelated polypeptides and are differentially expressed in response to drought and salt stress. Planta 2006, 223, 901–909. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pereira, P.N.; Gaspar, M.; Smith, J.A.C.; Mercier, H. Ammonium intensifies CAM photosynthesis and counteracts drought effects by increasing malate transport and antioxidant capacity in Guzmania monostachia. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1993–2003. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Gregory, A.L.; Hurley, B.A.; Tran, H.T.; Valentine, A.J.; She, Y.-M.; Knowles, V.L.; Plaxton, W.C. In vivo regulatory phosphorylation of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase AtPPC1 in phosphate-starved Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. J. 2009, 420, 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  28. Owttrim, G.W. RNA helicases and abiotic stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 3220–3230. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nidumukkala, S.; Tayi, L.; Chittela, R.K.; Vudem, D.R.; Khareedu, V.R. DEAD box helicases as promising molecular tools for engineering abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 395–407. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gilman, B.; Tijerina, P.; Russell, R. Distinct RNA-unwinding mechanisms of DEAD-box and DEAH-box RNA helicase proteins in remodeling structured RNAs and RNPs. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2017, 45, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar]
  31. Linder, P.; Owttrim, G. Plant RNA helicases: Linking aberrant and silencing RNA. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 344–352. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gu, L.; Xu, T.; Lee, K.; Lee, K.H.; Kang, H. A chloroplast-localized DEAD-box RNA helicaseAtRH3 is essential for intron splicing and plays an important role in the growth and stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 82, 309–318. [Google Scholar]
  33. Asakura, Y.; Galarneau, E.; Watkins, K.P.; Wijk, B.K.J.V. Chloroplast RH3 DEAD Box RNA Helicases in Maize and Arabidopsis Function in Splicing of Specific Group II Introns and Affect Chloroplast Ribosome Biogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 961–974. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Carlotto, N.; Wirth, S.; Furman, N.; Ferreyra, S.N.; Ariel, F.; Crespi, M.; Kobayashi, K. The chloroplastic DEVH-box RNA helicase increased size exclusion limit 2 involved in plasmodesmata regulation is required for group II intron splicing. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Vashisht, A.A.; Tuteja, N. Stress responsive DEAD-box helicases: A new pathway to engineer plant stress tolerance. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2006, 84, 150–160. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mahesh, S.; Udayakumar, M. Peanut RNA helicase AhRH47 sustains protein synthesis under stress and improves stress adaptation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 36, 58–70. [Google Scholar]
  37. Carlson, S.M.; Soulette, C.M.; Yang, Z.; Elias, J.E.; Brooks, A.N.; Gozani, O. RBM25 is a global splicing factor promoting inclusion of alternatively spliced exons and is itself regulated by lysine mono-methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 13381–13390. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tian, B.; Manley, J.L. Alternative polyadenylation of mRNA precursors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 18–30. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shang, X.; Cao, Y.; Ma, L. Alternative splicing in plant genes: A means of regulating the environmental fitness of plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 432. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, H.; Lin, C.; Gu, L. Light regulation of alternative Pre-mRNA splicing in plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 2017, 93, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yan, Q.; Xia, X.; Sun, Z.; Fang, Y. Depletion of Arabidopsis SC35 and SC35-like serine/arginine-rich proteins affects the transcription and splicing of a subset of genes. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006663. [Google Scholar]
  42. Carvalho, R.F.; Szakonyi, D.; Simpson, C.G.; Barbosa, I.C.R.; Brown, J.W.S.; Baena-González, E.; Duque, P. The Arabidopsis SR45 Splicing Factor, a Negative Regulator of Sugar Signaling, Modulates SNF1-Related Protein Kinase 1 Stability. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 1910–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mishra, D.; Shekhar, S.; Singh, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakraborty, N. Heat Shock Proteins and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Regulation of Heat Shock Protein Responses; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 41–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Divya, K.; Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Sharma, K.K.; Reddy, P.S. Heat Shock Proteins (Hsps) Mediated Signalling Pathways during Abiotic Stress Conditions. In Plant Signaling Molecules; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 499–516. [Google Scholar]
  45. Singh, R.K.; Gupta, V.; Prasad, M. Plant Molecular Chaperones: Structural Organization and their Roles in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. In Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biology and Biotechnology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 221–239. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kao, C.-H.; Ryu, S.; Kim, M.J.; Wen, X.; Wimalarathne, O.; Paull, T.T. Growth-regulated Hsp70 phosphorylation regulates stress responses and prion maintenance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2020, 40, e00628-19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Zemanovic, S.; Ivanov, M.V.; Ivanova, L.V.; Bhatnagar, A.; Michalkiewicz, T.; Teng, R.-J.; Kumar, S.; Rathore, R.; Pritchard, K.A., Jr.; Konduri, G.G. Dynamic phosphorylation of the C terminus of Hsp70 regulates the mitochondrial import of SOD2 and redox balance. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 2605–2616.e7. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Truman, A.W. Cracking the chaperone code: Cellular roles for Hsp70 phosphorylation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 932–935. [Google Scholar]
  49. Moss, S.M.; Taylor, I.R.; Ruggero, D.; Gestwicki, J.E.; Shokat, K.M.; Mukherjee, S. A Legionella pneumophila Kinase Phosphorylates the Hsp70 Chaperone Family to Inhibit Eukaryotic Protein Synthesis. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 454–462.e6. [Google Scholar]
  50. Han, M.; Guo, W.; Liang, Z.; Yang, D.; Yan, X.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y. Effects of cerous nitrate on growth and tanshinone production in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. J. Rare Earths 2015, 33, 1228–1235. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ma, Y.; Yuan, L.; Wu, B.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Lu, S. Genome-wide identification and characterization of novel genes involved in terpenoid biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2809–2823. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ding, K.; Pei, T.; Bai, Z.; Jia, Y.; Ma, P.; Liang, Z. SmMYB36, a novel R2R3-MYB transcription factor, enhances tanshinone accumulation and decreases phenolic acid content in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Xing, B.; Yang, D.; Yu, H.; Zhang, B.; Yan, K.; Zhang, X.; Han, R.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of SmbHLH10 enhances tanshinones biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 229–238. [Google Scholar]
  54. Vaccaro, M.C.; Alfieri, M.; De Tommasi, N.; Moses, T.; Goossens, A.; Leone, A. Boosting the Synthesis of Pharmaceutically Active Abietane Diterpenes in S. sclarea Hairy Roots by Engineering the GGPPS and CPPS Genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 924. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mei, L.; Li, Z.; Yan, Y.; Wen, Z.; Wen, X.; Yang, Z.; Feng, Y. Identification and functional study of oleoresin terpenoid biosynthesis-related genes in masson pine (Pinus massoniana L.) based on transcriptome analysis. Tree Genet. Genomes 2020, 16, 53. [Google Scholar]
  56. Karunanithi, P.S.; Zerbe, P. Terpene synthases as metabolic gatekeepers in the evolution of plant terpenoid chemical diversity. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Cheng, Q.; Su, P.; Hu, Y.; He, Y.; Gao, W.; Huang, L. RNA interference-mediated repression of SmCPS (copalyldiphosphate synthase) expression in hairy roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza causes a decrease of tanshinones and sheds light on the functional role of SmCPS. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Zhou, Y.; Sun, W.; Chen, J.; Tan, H.; Xiao, Y.; Li, Q.; Ji, Q.; Gao, S.; Chen, L.; Chen, S. Sm MYC2a and Sm MYC2b played similar but irreplaceable roles in regulating the biosynthesis of tanshinones and phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22852. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Xing, B.; Liang, L.; Liu, L.; Hou, Z.; Yang, D.; Yan, K.; Zhang, X.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of SmbHLH148 induced biosynthesis of tanshinones as well as phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang, J.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Tan, R.; Zhao, S. Overexpression of SmMYB9b enhances tanshinone concentration in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1297–1309. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jiang, Y.; Wang, L.; Lu, S.; Xue, Y.; Wei, X.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Y. Transcriptome sequencing of Salvia miltiorrhiza after infection by its endophytic fungi and identification of genes related to tanshinone biosynthesis. Pharm. Biol. 2019, 57, 760–769. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao, Y.; Kiss, T.; DelFavero, J.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Zheng, L.; Wang, J.; Jiang, C.; Shi, J.; Ungvari, Z. CD82-TRPM7-Numb signaling mediates age-related cognitive impairment. GeroScience 2020, 12, 595–611. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The changes in the morphology of Salvia miltiorrhiza in response to drought stress. MD and HD indicate moderate drought (2-week withholding water) and high drought stress (4-week withholding water), respectively. CK, control.
Figure 1. The changes in the morphology of Salvia miltiorrhiza in response to drought stress. MD and HD indicate moderate drought (2-week withholding water) and high drought stress (4-week withholding water), respectively. CK, control.
Agronomy 12 00781 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of sequence motifs related to phosphorylation sites. (A), the sequence of several motifs of phosphorylation sites. (B,C) the heatmap for the distribution of amino acids in the flanking sequences of serine and threonine phosphorylation sites, respectively.
Figure 2. Analysis of sequence motifs related to phosphorylation sites. (A), the sequence of several motifs of phosphorylation sites. (B,C) the heatmap for the distribution of amino acids in the flanking sequences of serine and threonine phosphorylation sites, respectively.
Agronomy 12 00781 g002
Figure 3. The statistics of phosphosites and phosphoproteins in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. (A), the pie chart of phosphosites in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. (B), the histogram of phosphosites and phosphoproteins had significant changes (|fold change| > 1.5 and p < 0.05) in the phosphorylation level under high drought (HD) and moderate drought (MD) stress, respectively. (C), the Venn diagram of significantly changed phosphoproteins upon HD and MD stress. (D), the cellular location analysis of significantly changed phosphoproteins. (E), the heatmap clustering of the protein domain derived from significantly changed phosphoproteins upon HD and MD stress, respectively. CK, control.
Figure 3. The statistics of phosphosites and phosphoproteins in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. (A), the pie chart of phosphosites in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. (B), the histogram of phosphosites and phosphoproteins had significant changes (|fold change| > 1.5 and p < 0.05) in the phosphorylation level under high drought (HD) and moderate drought (MD) stress, respectively. (C), the Venn diagram of significantly changed phosphoproteins upon HD and MD stress. (D), the cellular location analysis of significantly changed phosphoproteins. (E), the heatmap clustering of the protein domain derived from significantly changed phosphoproteins upon HD and MD stress, respectively. CK, control.
Agronomy 12 00781 g003
Figure 4. The KEGG pathways related to significantly changed phosphoproteins upon drought stress. (A), the bubble plot of KEGG pathways that relate to phosphoproteins had significant changes in the phosphorylation level in response to high drought (HD) and moderate drought (MD) stress, respectively. (B), the heatmap clustering of KEGG pathways related to phosphoproteins whose phosphorylation levels were significantly decreased and increased by HD and MD stress, respectively. CK, control. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Figure 4. The KEGG pathways related to significantly changed phosphoproteins upon drought stress. (A), the bubble plot of KEGG pathways that relate to phosphoproteins had significant changes in the phosphorylation level in response to high drought (HD) and moderate drought (MD) stress, respectively. (B), the heatmap clustering of KEGG pathways related to phosphoproteins whose phosphorylation levels were significantly decreased and increased by HD and MD stress, respectively. CK, control. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Agronomy 12 00781 g004
Figure 5. The protein-protein interaction network of significantly changed phosphoproteins in response to high drought stress. Blue and orange color notes phosphoproteins with significantly increased and decreased phosphorylation levels, respectively. Node size presents the interaction degree. The larger the node, the higher the degree of interaction is. Gray circles present the protein subsets with different functional classifications (red word). ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
Figure 5. The protein-protein interaction network of significantly changed phosphoproteins in response to high drought stress. Blue and orange color notes phosphoproteins with significantly increased and decreased phosphorylation levels, respectively. Node size presents the interaction degree. The larger the node, the higher the degree of interaction is. Gray circles present the protein subsets with different functional classifications (red word). ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
Agronomy 12 00781 g005
Figure 6. The phosphorylation profiles of significantly changed phosphoproteins in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. (A), the heatmap showing the changed phosphorylation profiles of proteins related to terpenoid and phenol metabolisms in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves in response to drought stress (high drought, HD; and moderate drought, MD). (B), the heatmap showing the phosphorylation profiles of several transcription factors related to terpenoid and phenol metabolisms in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. Capital letters following heatmap indicate the phosphorylation sites (serine, S; tyrosine, Y; and threonine, T). CK, control.
Figure 6. The phosphorylation profiles of significantly changed phosphoproteins in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. (A), the heatmap showing the changed phosphorylation profiles of proteins related to terpenoid and phenol metabolisms in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves in response to drought stress (high drought, HD; and moderate drought, MD). (B), the heatmap showing the phosphorylation profiles of several transcription factors related to terpenoid and phenol metabolisms in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. Capital letters following heatmap indicate the phosphorylation sites (serine, S; tyrosine, Y; and threonine, T). CK, control.
Agronomy 12 00781 g006
Figure 7. The phosphorylation profiles of proteins related to RNA splicing (A), energy metabolism (B), and heat shock proteins (HSPs, (C) in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. Capital letters following the heatmap indicate the phosphorylation sites (serine, S; tyrosine, Y; and threonine, T). HD, high drought, HD. MD, moderate drought. CK, control.
Figure 7. The phosphorylation profiles of proteins related to RNA splicing (A), energy metabolism (B), and heat shock proteins (HSPs, (C) in Salvia miltiorrhiza leaves. Capital letters following the heatmap indicate the phosphorylation sites (serine, S; tyrosine, Y; and threonine, T). HD, high drought, HD. MD, moderate drought. CK, control.
Agronomy 12 00781 g007
Table 1. Modified site feature sequence and enrichment statistics.
Table 1. Modified site feature sequence and enrichment statistics.
MotifsProtein AccessionProtein DescriptionModified SequencesRegulated
(Stress/CK)
xxxxxx_S_xGxxxxSMil_00024868Probable LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase At1g56130LS(1)AGDLRUp
SMil_00002640Uncharacterized proteinVKQHT(1)LVS(1)GGVRUp
SMil_00004629Clathrin interactor EPSIN 2NPANEDDGQY(0.017)S(0.988)S(0.994)RGS(1)GARUp
SMil_00006738Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 8 (FBA8)LS(0.035)S(0.965)INVENIEANRUp
SMil_00021644Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 2 (FBA2)LAS(1)IGLENTEANRUp
SMil_00009411Stromal 70 kDa heat shock-related protein (HSP70)DAIS(0.968)GGS(0.031)T(0.001)QAMKUp
SMil_00013683Uncharacterized proteinS(1)GKELEKUp
SMil_00025367Uncharacterized proteinITNPEPFLPLGS(0.006)DAFS(0.803)T(0.191)GKUp
xxxxxx_S_xDxxxxSMil_00003440Serine/threonine-protein kinase STN7NALAS(1)ALRUp
SMil_00023541Serine/threonine-protein kinase EDR1FVDS(0.987)LT(0.013)AEEKDown
SMil_00024588Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 4 (PPC4)ES(0.039)S(0.958)LDT(0.002)SKUp
SMil_00005515Uncharacterized proteinFDS(0.32)IS(0.686)S(0.984)S(0.01)RUp
SMil_00007312Brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange protein 5 (BIG5)VT(0.006)GES(0.909)LS(0.085)NFEELKUp
SMil_0001450940S ribosomal protein S27-2 (RPS27b)LTEGCS(1)FRUp
SMil_00017266Uncharacterized proteinKLEDFEHSEAVAES(0.995)ENNS(0.005)DRDown
SMil_00019200Uncharacterized proteinADTGDQS(1)EEKUp
SMil_00022967ATP-dependent helicase BRMSGNGSAGPLS(0.98)PT(0.02)GIGRDown
xxxxxx_S_DxExxxSMil_00008933U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein PRP4 (LIS)T(0.044)AT(0.933)GHEY(0.023)EISEESKUp
SMil_00009506DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 53 (RH53)AGFAVADYS(1)DGERDown
xxxxxx_S_PKxxxxSMil_00006271Heat stress transcription factor A-5 (HSFA5)LDEAQALS(0.017)S(0.907)S(0.076)PDANKUp
SMil_00009223Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (EIF4G)S(0.01)LS(0.984)LES(0.006)PKUp
SMil_00011806EH domain-containing protein 2 (EHD2)GTDAS(1)LPKUp
xxxxxx_S_PRxxxxSMil_00009056C2 domain-containing protein At1g53590 (NTMC2T6.1)QIS(1)GQVRUp
SMil_00009156Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor RSZ22S(0.027)Y(0.014)S(0.907)RS(0.075)PY(0.978)RUp
xxxxxx_S_PxRxxxSMil_00024390Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor RS40KDGET(0.075)DHNHKHS(0.824)S(0.863)S(0.239)PQRDown
SMil_00005515UncharacterizedFDS(0.32)IS(0.686)S(0.984)S(0.01)RUp
SMil_00011483UncharacterizedHLS(0.807)T(0.193)DLPRUp
SMil_00013395UncharacterizedLGFGLS(0.004)GS(0.996)GKUp
SMil_00013952Villin-4 (VLN4)QNS(1)VDQSPKDown
SMil_00019792Hsp70-Hsp90 organizing protein 3 (HOP3)EDTEMASNGS(1)PERUp
SMil_00023663Serine/arginine-rich SC35-like splicing factor SCL30AAPPPARS(1)PS(1)RUp
SMil_00023754UncharacterizedHGS(1)VKPNEAAIPEGKUp
SMil_00030131Splicing factor U2af small subunit B (U2AF35B)S(1)RS(1)PVREGS(1)EERUp
SMil_00022481DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 40 (RH40)S(0.007)FS(0.994)RS(1)PDRUp
xxxxxx_S_xRxxxxSMil_0002863360S ribosomal protein L15NQTLS(1)LRUp
SMil_00023717Chaperone protein dnaJ 10 (ATJ10)S(0.056)ANGS(0.753)NS(0.19)VPTDPPSHKUp
xxxxxx_T_PxxxxxSMil_0001192540S ribosomal protein S13T(0.999)PPS(0.001)WLKUp
xxxxxx_S_FRxxxxSMil_0002876840S ribosomal protein S10-2GGAPADFQPS(1)FRUp
xxxxRx_S_xxxxxxSMil_00013683Elongation factor 1-alpha EF1S(1)GKELEKUp
SMil_00003660DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 3 (RH3)SPSFGGRDS(0.914)S(0.086)RUp
xxxxxx_S_xxxRxxSMil_00029002Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUVR5NIAS(1)PVNKUp
xxxxxx_S_PxxxxxSMil_00028660Exocyst complex component EXO70A1WDS(0.319)S(0.681)AS(1)EDARUp
xxxxxG_S_xxxxxxSMil_00027479Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor SR34AGS(1)GGGGGGGGGSGSGGGRDown
SMil_00027680Probable mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 37e (MED3E)MYQGAGGEVPMDDDAPAPS(0.144)GGS(0.856)GAGPKUp
SMil_0000411630S ribosomal protein S9VVLQEGS(1)GKUp
xxxxxx_T_DxxxxxSMil_00028092Protein STABILIZED1 (STA1)GY(0.01)LT(0.99)DLKDown
xxxxxx_S_xPxxxxSMil_00001202Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCKA)S(0.999)APT(0.59)T(0.411)PLNGSQGPFGAVSEDERDown
The numbers in parenthesis adjacent to the phosphorylation sites are phosphorylation probability.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Su, Y.; Song, Z.; Wang, J. The Posttranscriptional Mechanism in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge Leaves in Response to Drought Stress Using Phosphoproteomics. Agronomy 2022, 12, 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040781

AMA Style

Zhang J, Li J, Su Y, Song Z, Wang J. The Posttranscriptional Mechanism in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge Leaves in Response to Drought Stress Using Phosphoproteomics. Agronomy. 2022; 12(4):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jin, Jingyu Li, Yuekai Su, Zhenqiao Song, and Jianhua Wang. 2022. "The Posttranscriptional Mechanism in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge Leaves in Response to Drought Stress Using Phosphoproteomics" Agronomy 12, no. 4: 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop