Next Article in Journal
Integrated Hydrological Modeling for Watershed Analysis, Flood Prediction, and Mitigation Using Meteorological and Morphometric Data, SCS-CN, HEC-HMS/RAS, and QGIS
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevention of Water Seepage Impact on the Soluble Rocks Using Colloidal Silica
Previous Article in Journal
Groundwater Depletion and Degradation in the North China Plain: Challenges and Mitigation Options
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Long-Term Rainfall in Semi-Arid Area Using Artificial Intelligence Models (Case Study: Ilam Province, Iran)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proposal of a Reflector-Enhanced Solar Still Concept and Its Comparison with Conventional Solar Stills

by
Mehdi Soltanian
1,
Siamak Hoseinzadeh
2,* and
Davide Astiaso Garcia
2
1
Graduate Faculty of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Theran, Tehran 1417853111, Iran
2
Department of Planning, Design, and Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(2), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020355
Submission received: 26 December 2023 / Revised: 10 January 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2024 / Published: 21 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Renewable Energy System Flexibility for Water Desalination: Volume II)

Abstract

:
Water scarcity is a global concern and poses significant problems to countries with arid and semi-arid climates, like Iran. Considering financial difficulties, a lack of knowledge about high-tech alternatives, low incomes, a lack of access to high-tech tools, and low maintenance capabilities in developing countries, solar still desalination is a decent technology for providing proper water, especially for rural areas. However, the low water-production rate using this method dictates a very vast area requirement for solar still farms in order to provide significant amounts of water. In this research, we proposed a mirror-enhanced solar still and mathematically compared its water-production rate to that of conventional ones. In comparison to conventional solar stills, our proposed reflector-enhanced solar still benefits from several improvements, including lower glass temperatures, increased water basing temperatures, and receiving much more solar irradiation. Hence, the proposed system can increase water production from 7.5 L/day to 24 L/day. The results showed that the proposed method is highly effective and could be used in field-scale projects in arid and semi-arid climates.

1. Introduction

Although the earth is predominantly covered by water, in numerous nations across the globe, there is a notable and concerning trend of diminishing freshwater availability. The reduction in fresh water supply is facilitated by a confluence of factors; in particular, the escalation of the population, the unsustainable exploitation of groundwater resources, the infrequency of precipitation events [1], and the exponential growth of global industries have led to a substantial surge in the need for freshwater [2]. Moreover, approximately 80% of the global population resides in countries characterized by arid and semi-arid conditions [3]. Therefore, water scarcity, which means a lack of water supply or safe water quality, could be considered a widespread problem that causes competition for water. Currently, almost half of the earth’s population is experiencing its consequences [4]. Considering irrigation activity has almost a 75% share of typical water usage [5], it is predictable that farmers and people living in agricultural areas will be some of the most-affected people by water scarcity, and research also shows almost 3.0 billion people in agricultural areas are experiencing a high water shortage [6,7,8]. To address the water shortage issue and align with SDGs, developing highly efficient mechanisms that require low maintenance and could provide proper water is of great importance [9,10,11,12].
In addition, energy is seen as a pivotal concern in the economic advancement of countries [13], and on a yearly basis, energy consumption in developing countries grows by 5% on average [14]. Consequently, renewable energy sources have garnered significant attention globally in recent years [15] and solar energy is the leading renewable energy source [16]; this is predicted to significantly impact energy security and environmental problems in both emerging and established countries [17]. Solar power is the primary form of renewable energy utilized for generating electricity [18], operating solar collectors [19,20,21], cooking with solar energy [22,23], drying with solar energy [24], combining solar and biomass energy [24], and heating metals [24]. As a result, although desalination approaches like reverse osmosis [25], ion exchange [26], and other common desalination methods [27,28,29,30] have been used worldwide, the main possible drawbacks of these systems are their setup costs, operational costs, and high energy consumption, [31,32], which leads to a significant interest in utilizing user-friendly and eco-friendly techniques such as solar stills for the purpose of desalinating water [1]. The use of solar energy reduces the reliance on fossil fuels and toxic substances, resulting in decreased emissions of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming [2].
Due to its enormous popularity, researchers have been endeavoring to develop an ideal system with a similar underlying mechanism and minor modifications by implementing design modifications or using various methods for economic optimization [33], such as thermoelectric methods [34]; mirrors [35]; heat pipes [36]; finned plates [37]; surface coatings [38]; single and double slopes [39,40,41]; single, multiple, and stepped basins [42,43,44,45,46]; and pyramid and spherical methods [47,48]. Jeevadason and Padmini [49] examined the effects of using a novel glass cover design and found that it resulted in a 51.5% increase in water productivity. Mevada et al. [50] examined the impact of various energy storage materials, such as black granite and marble stone, on water productivity and the rate of evaporation enhancement. Ghani Hameed [51] achieved a 40% improvement in water generation compared to standard methods by employing fins and a glass cooling approach. Panchal et al. [52] employed an evacuated tube collector and hollow bumps to enhance the efficiency of desalination. The redesigned solar still yielded 2.44 times the amount of water compared to the traditional solar still. Abdullah et al. [53] conducted an evaluation of the impact of nano-PCM, a heating element, and finned absorbers on the production of water in solar stills. The findings showed a significant improvement of 166% in the water output compared to that using conventional methods. Gupta et al. [54] conducted research to quantify the enhanced efficiency of solar distillation, an increase of 10.6%, compared to PV/T-FPC solar desalination. Xiao et al. [55] integrated PV/thermal technology with solar distillation to enhance the efficiency of the device. They found that the temperature of the saline water increased by 16.4% and the daily production of the system increased by 51.7%. In a study conducted by Kumar and Tiwari [56], the impact of photovoltaic systems on sun still (SS) efficiency was examined. The study found that the production of the conventional system was almost 2250 mL, whereas the production of modified solar desalination was 7220 mL.
The authors assert that the improvement of solar stills employing traditional materials, which can be maintained without the need for specialized skill, is of high importance, especially for privileged rural areas in developing countries and in arid climates, like rural areas in the south of Iran, which is not only facing a lack of groundwater, but its high TDS also makes it undesirable for domestic and agricultural usage. In this regard, we proposed a parabolic solar collector solar still (PSCSS) desalination system. The proposed system is a combination of a parabolic solar cocker idea and a solar still that greatly increases the input solar energy into the solar still and significantly enhances the evaporation and water-production rates. In addition, in this system, a new pathway for water was considered, which reduces the glass temperature while increasing the water temperature before feeding into the basin of the solar still. This method can increase the water temperature in the system and improve the evaporation rate. In this research, the design and evaluation of the water-production capacity of the proposed PSCSS were conducted and compared to those in a conventional solar still system.
To estimate the solar irradiation incident on the parabolic disc, we utilized the annual mean value of the sun irradiation in the south of Iran based on the data available on the World Bank website [57], which are presented in Figure 1. In order to streamline the calculations, we divided the total annual energy by 365 and assumed that the distribution of light radiation during a day follows a triangle pattern with a duration of 12 h.

2. The Fundamental Working of Solar Stills

An essential solar distiller consists of a reservoir containing a shallow layer of saline water in a basin that is colored black, a glass in an inclined position, a channel for collecting fresh water, a thermal barrier on all sides except for the glass one, an exit valve for removing solid sediments from the basin, and an inlet for introducing water. The storage container is filled with natural light, which heats the saline water within the basin, which then vaporizes. The vapors condense into liquid water upon the passage of heat to the glass cover. Condensed drops from the tilting lid are collected in the extraction canal located on the side wall of the still. The salts and pollutants are left behind and can be removed using the removal process. Although solar stills have the ability to transform salt water into low-TDS water, they are not efficient and have a limited capacity for water production [58].

3. Climate of Iran

With an area of 1,648,000 km2 and a population of more than 80 million in 2017, Iran is the seventeenth biggest country in the world and is located in the western region of Asia [59,60]. Agricultural land makes up nearly 11.2% of the country’s total land area, while 8.7% is forested, 19.7% is arid land, and 7.3% is industrial/residential. In recent years, the nation has seen a decline in precipitation and is faced with drought and shortages of water [61]. The climate in Iran is predominantly arid and semi-arid, with the exception of the mountainous regions in the northern and western parts of the entire country. In addition, apart from the coastal regions, the temperature in Iran exhibits a substantial annual variation, ranging from approximately 22 °C to 26 °C. The majority of Iran experiences the influence of subtropical high air masses throughout the summer season. These result in the occurrence of scorching summers in the country, while precipitation reduces to 100 mm or less in the central and eastern regions of Iran. Iran has a favorable geographical location for receiving solar energy. The sun irradiation in Iran is predicted to be around 1800 to 2200 kWh/m2 per year, which exceeds the global average. Iran has a high average annual number of over 280 sunny days, which covers over ninety percent of its territory and represents a significant and lucrative energy resource [62].

4. Mathematical Calculation

4.1. Energy Analysis

One method for determining the energy efficiency of a system is to calculate the ratio of the system’s productivity to the total quantity of energy that it absorbs from solar radiation. The equation below shows how energy efficiency could be measured effectively [1,63].
η d a i l y = m e v × h f g I t × A b
The variables I t (W/m2), m e v (L/h), and h f g represent the cumulative daily radiation, the daily production of the system, and the latent heat of vaporization, respectively. Furthermore, A b represents the precise measurement of the surface area of the absorber in a traditional solar desalination setup. In a simple system, A b is equal to the basin of the solar still, which in this study is 1 m2, and in our proposed modified system, A b refers to the combined area of both the reflector plate and the absorber plate in a solar still.

4.2. Thermal Equations

The heat transfer modes using energy balances and possible heat transfer routes in our proposed system are presented in Figure 2. The calculation of the volume of water production and the required area was conducted using Microsoft Excel 2020 by considering energy balance equations for the glass, water, and basin and for the parameters mentioned in Table 1 [64]. The energy balance equations are as follows:
The energy balance of the glass cover [45]:
M g C p g d T g d t = Q w g c + Q w g r + Q w g e Q g a c Q g s r + α g A g I ( t )
In this equation and on the left side, M g , C p g , and T g are the mass of glass, the specific heat transfer, and the glass temperature. On the right side of the equation, α g , A g , and I t are the sorption percentage, the area of the glass, and sun irradiation, respectively. In addition, Q w g c , Q w g r , Q w g e , Q g a c , and Q g s r are the convection energy input from the water to the glass, the radiant energy input from the water to the glass, the evaporation energy input from the water to the glass, the convectional energy loss from the glass to the air, and the radiant energy loss from the glass to the sky.
The energy balance for the water [45]:
M w C p w d T w d t = Q b w c Q w g c Q w g r Q w g e Q f w + α w τ g A w I ( t )
Similar to the above equation, this equation is written for the water’s energy balance, and the differences from the previous equation are Q f w , τ g , and A w , which are related to the loss of energy because of water production and saltwater entering the basin, the percentage of solar irradiation that passed the glass, and the area of the water in the basin.
The energy balance for the basin [45]:
M b C p b d T w d t = Q b w c Q l o s s + α b τ w τ g A b I t + Q R b r
where A w ,   A b ,   T w , a n d   T g are the area of water, the basin area, the temperature of the water, and the temperature of the glass, respectively. In addition, Q l o s s , Q R b r , τ w , and A b are the loss of energy from the basin to the air, the irradiation energy from the reflector to the basin, the solar irradiation that passed the water depth, and the basin area.
The convection heat transfer between the water and the glass can be calculated as [65]
Q w g c = h w g c A w ( T w T g )
The radiation heat transfer between the water and the glass can be calculated as
Q w g r = h w g r ( T w T g )
The evaporation heat transfer between the water and the glass can be calculated as [65]
Q w g e = h w g e A w ( T w T g )
The convection heat transfer between the basin and the water can be calculated as [66]
Q b w c = h b w c A b ( T b T w )
In the mentioned equations, h w g c , h w g r , h w g e , and h b w c are the heat transfer coefficient of convection between the water and the glass, the radiation between the water and the glass, the evaporation between the water and the glass, and the convection between the basin and the water, respectively. The parameters that are used in the above equations can be calculated as below [65,67,68]:
h w g e = 0.016237 × h w g c × P w P g T w T g
h f g = 2401.67 2.389 × T w × 10 3
h w g c = 0.884 × T w T g + P w P g × T w + 273.15 268900 P w 1 3
P w = exp 25.314 5144 T w + 273
P g = exp 25.314 5144 T g + 273
P w and P g are the partial saturated vapor pressure in water and the glass temperature, respectively [67].
h w g r = ε e f f × σ × ( T w + 237.15 ) 4 ( T w + 237.15 ) 4 T w T g
ε e f f = 1 ε w + 1 ε g 1 1
h w g e = 16.273 × 1 0 3 × h w g c P w P g T w T g
The solar irradiation reflected from a reflector to the basin of the solar still:
Q R b r = A b × h r b × i r r a d i a t i o n
The hourly water production of the solar still [69]:
m e v = h w g e T w T g × 3600 h f g
where m e v and h f g are the hourly water production (liter/hour) and the latent heat of evaporation (W/m2 K). To facilitate the calculation and by considering the equal temperatures of the basin and the water, which is almost a correct assumption, Equations (2) and (3) can be combined, and Equation (18) will be extracted. In this research, we utilized this equation. So, as shown in Figure 4, we consider the water and the basin a system, and we consider the input and output energy to this system.
M w C p w d T w d t + M b C p b d T w d t = Q w g c Q w g r Q w g e Q f w Q l o s s + α b τ w τ g A b I ( t ) + α w τ g A w I ( t )

5. Description of the Proposed System

According to the climatic conditions of the study area and previous studies in south Iran, despite the initial high cost, the use of solar energy is a good option for a long period of time. In addition, previous research shows that the water-production rate of solar desalination systems is almost 0.5 L/m2 hr. Therefore, it does not seem reasonable to use conventional solar stills unless utilizing a modifications approach, which is capable of significantly reducing the required area. As a result, in this research, an effort was made to provide the water with the minimum required number of modified solar still systems with no high-tech materials.
The mathematical inquiry involves two solar stills that have identical features. One of the solar stills is equipped with a parabolic solar collector to function as an improved solar still, while the other one remains a traditional solar still for the sake of comparison. The solar stills consist of a galvanized steel sheet that is 0.002 m thick and has an effective basin area of 1 m2. The object consists of a black basin that is tightly sealed at the top with a transparent glass cover. The upper glass layer is 4 mm thick and is inclined at a 30-degree angle relative to the horizontal surface. The calculation is performed assuming no leakage. Furthermore, the orientation of both systems is deemed comparable. The water temperature increases due to sun radiation, facilitated by convective heat transfer from the water to the basin. The water vapor ascends, departs from the surface of the basin, encounters a barrier, and results in the condensation of vapors to water.
The main drawbacks of conventional solar still systems are the high required energy for heating the water, the elevated temperature of the glass during the working time, and the limited working time. As shown in Figure 3, in order to overcome the high temperature of the glass, a new water pathway for the solar still system was used in this research. In the proposed new system, the water entrance pathway was changed, and after passing through the grooves of the top glass, the heated water feeds into the basin.
In order to make the calculations simpler, instead of using the exact radiation values, we assumed that the hourly solar radiation distribution is geometrical. Therefore, as shown in Figure 4, we assumed that the daylight period is 12 h of radiation, and its distribution is linear. Although this assumption is not accurate, it is not far from the actual irradiation of the south of Iran. Based on the below calculation and Figure 4, it can be seen that approximately 0.55% of solar radiation is in the middle 4 h of the day, which justifies the 4 h period that we considered in this research. And the highest amount of water production is in the same hourly range.
E n t i r e   a r e a   u n d e r l i n e = 0.5 × 1000 × 18 6 + 13 11 = 7000   W a t t   p e r   d a y
U p p e r   h a t c h e d   a r e a = 0.5 × 200 × 14 10 + 13 11 = 600   W a t t   p e r   d a y
L o w e r   h a t c h e d   a r e a = ( 14 10 ) × 800 = 3200   W a t t   p e r   d a y
Proportion   of   hatched   area :   ( 3200 + 600 ) 7000 × 100 55 %

Proposed Solar Energy Collection

Considering a parabolic reflector for improving solar energy systems is an appropriate approach [70], and as shown in Figure 2, the amount of radiation in the system can be increased to a great extent. However, the critical point is that the angle of the sun will be different during the day and during the year. Considering the angle of sun radiation in the south of Iran and based on Figure 5, it can be concluded that the solar radiation during a year is almost between 40 and 85 degrees.
Figure 4. Linear approximation of solar irradiation in the south of Iran.
Figure 4. Linear approximation of solar irradiation in the south of Iran.
Water 16 00355 g004
Since we are trying to propose a passive system that reflects solar radiation to the distillation system throughout the year without the need to apply direction changes or a solar radiation tracking system, the important point is to adjust the angle of the reflector in such a way that there is no need to change the angle of the reflector throughout the year and this system can reflect solar radiation to the solar still. This can be achieved by using the concept of a focal plane instead of the focal point of the reflector.
The radiation parallel to the main axis of the parabolic reflector focuses solar irradiation on the focal point; however, in such conditions and with the change in the angle of sun radiation during the day and throughout the year, the location of the focal point will be changed. Therefore, in order to limit the reflected energy from the parabolic reflector to the solar still, it is necessary to calculate the proportional theta angle based on the peak hours of solar radiation energy (middle 4 h of the day) and the dimensions of the distillation system in such a way that the stated objectives are met. As shown in Figure 6, according to the target surface and the desired θ angle, the amount of surface needed for the reflector can be obtained [72]. Considering that the radiation angle in the desired geographical area is between 40 and 85 degrees, if the reflecting direction is set in the middle of the two, the angle will become about 64 degrees, and the θ angle is 24 degrees. So, we can reflect the sun’s radiation to the target surface (the bottom of the solar still system) all year round for at least 4 h a day.
As we know, every hour the movement of the sun is equivalent to 15 degrees. Therefore, it is necessary to consider a horizontal θ angle of 30 degrees so that the sun’s radiation in the range of 2 h before and 2 h after noon can be reflected to the target area, that is, the bottom of the solar still system. Therefore, the previous calculated angle (24 degrees) is not proper for this purpose, and we considered the θ angle equal to 30 degrees and calculated the required reflective surface. As a result, based on the below equations [73], the reflector must have a surface four times higher than the target surface, which has a surface of 1 square meter.
C i d e a l = 1 ( s i n Θ ) 2
C = A r e f l e c t o r A t a r g e t
This value means 4 square meters of reflecting surface, which results in a reflecting radius of 110 cm. Therefore, the parabolic reflector has an approximate radius of 110 cm and an angle direction of 63 degrees.

6. Mathematical Model Verification

In order to ensure the applicability and reliability of the results, validation of the utilized mathematical models is of great importance. In this regard, the mathematical equations and input data, such as ambient temperature, radiation intensity, and area of the solar still, from previous research published by [74] were utilized to validate the calculation process. As Figure 7 shows, our calculations are accurate enough that the modeling, calculation, facilitating assumptions, and outcome results are considered correct.

7. Results and Discussion

The south of Iran receives high solar irradiation and is sunny most of the year; therefore, a solar still farm is a good choice for providing the required water for irrigation. In this regard, the proposed system utilizes solar power as one of the mentioned enhancement mechanisms. Considering the effects of reflectors, Figure 8 presents the total solar energy that enters the solar still system. It is noteworthy that even when the fecal area is not entirely on the basin, part of the reflection affects the energy entrance of the basin. Still, we ignore these energy inputs and consider the reflected solar radiation for 4 h.
The results presented are for a clear and sunny day despite the fact that solar intensity can vary from what we consider during a year. We consider a comparison between the proposed method and a conventional solar still calculated for summer, in which the solar radiation is high. As is presented in Figure 8, the maximum solar radiation was about 3520 W/m2 and 2816 W/m2 at noon and two hours before and after that, respectively. Figure 9 depicts the variation in temperature in the conventional and proposed systems. It is widely recognized that the disparity between the water and the glass cover inlet gives rise to an augmentation in the heat transfer through natural convection within the confines of the desalination system. The average difference between Tw and Tg in the conventional system was 6 °C. The highest Tg and Tw values were obtained at 1 p.m., about 58 °C and 67 °C, respectively, which led to a 34 °C temperature differential between the glass and the ambient temperature. The temperature fluctuation of the suggested system is also depicted in Figure 9. The patterns exhibited similarities to conventional ones, albeit with significantly greater values, primarily attributed to the integration of a solar collector. Throughout the testing, the average temperatures of the basin, water, and glass cover were recorded as 48, 39 and 29 °C, respectively. The water production of solar desalination increased by widening the temperature difference between the temperature of the water (Tw) and the temperature of the condenser (Tg). The glass cover reached a maximum temperature of 88 °C at 2 p.m., while the water vapor reached a maximum temperature of 98 °C at the same time.
Figure 10 illustrates the hourly fluctuation in freshwater production by both the traditional and proposed systems. The water generation trend is similar at different hours in both cases. The maximum hourly production, as determined, was 1.3 L/m2 and 5.06 L/m2, respectively, achieved at 1 p.m. The results demonstrated that the daily distillate production of the traditional and proposed methods was 23.29 L/m2 and 7.73 L/m2, respectively. The production increased by 301% compared to that of passive ones. The creation of water persisted in the evening after 6 p.m. even under low solar radiation in both. Furthermore, the amount of energy produced during the night in an active system was greater than in a passive system as a result of higher water and basin temperatures. The use of a solar collector increased the system’s absorption area and enhanced the water temperature in the solar still system.
Figure 11 displays the hourly energy efficiency of the systems. The efficiency of the solar still paired with a solar collector was higher than that of a traditional system due to the increased absorption area of the device. It was noted that the suggested system exhibited higher energy efficiency compared to conventional methods during different hours of testing. This was attributed to the utilization of a solar reflector. The conventional mechanism achieved a maximum hourly energy efficiency of 67.9%, whereas the proposed system achieved a maximum hourly energy efficiency of 78.2%. The daily energy efficiency for the systems was 25.6% and 32.6%, respectively.

8. Conclusions

Providing appropriate water in arid and semi-arid areas that are facing water shortages is of great importance, especially when agricultural activity is the leading financial resource of a local community. In the south of Iran, the local economy is highly dependent on agricultural activity, which is affected by high temperatures, high solar irradiation, a lack of proper water, and a lack of access to advanced technology. Although the presence of brackish wells near farms allows farmers to provide water for irrigation, high salinity and TDS dictate the need for a desalination system. Although there are a couple of studies trying to enhance the solar still water-production rate, they use high-tech elements like nonmaterial resources or combine the solar still system with other systems, which leads to non-significant increases in the water-production rate. For instance, Ref. [53] used nanomaterials and phase exchange materials to enhance the water-production rate to 136%, which, although it is a significant enhancement, the more complicated structure using wicks and trays in addition to nanomaterials makes it difficult to build and, importantly, maintain this system in remote areas. In addition, photovoltaic-based systems, such what Xiao et al. [55] utilized to enhance the water productivity compared to the mirror system which was implemented in this research, are more vulnerable to environmental factors, like very high temperatures, severe wind, heavy rain, and freezing. Kabeel et al. [48], used a basic improvement in the basin by adding hollow fins to the basin of the solar still in order to improve the heat transfer from the basin to the water, which does not cause any particular problems in construction or maintenance. However, it could increase water production by 1.6 L, from 4 L to 5.6 L per day. In contrast, in this paper, a solar still is designed utilizing conventional solar still and solar cooking concepts to overcome the drawbacks mentioned in previous research. For this purpose, a parabolic reflector was used to significantly increase the solar energy input to the solar still system and improve the water-production rate. The results showed that using the proposed system can increase the daily water production from almost 7.5 L/day to almost 24 L/day, which can be highly applicable to field-scale projects of providing water for less privileged rural areas or farmers who are faced with high-TDS water sources. In addition, although the efficiency of the proposed system is higher than that of the conventional mechanism, the decreasing rate after noon is also higher, which illustrates the significant need to use methods to lower the energy loss of the system. This research illustrates the capability of solar still systems to integrate with other systems. For future research, the following information can be provided:
Parabolic Collector Design Optimization:
  • Ensure that the parabolic collectors are specifically built to achieve the highest possible concentration of sunlight on the surface of the solar still.
  • Investigate high-performance materials for constructing the parabolic collector in order to enhance its resilience and ability to reflect sun irradiation.
  • Incorporation of Tracking devices:
  • Deploy solar tracking devices for the parabolic collectors to accurately track the sun’s trajectory throughout the day. This guarantees that the solar still receives the most favorable sunlight during the entire day, not just for 4 h.
  • Selective Coating for Solar Steel:
  • The coatings can be engineered to optimize absorption in the visible and near-infrared range while minimizing thermal energy dissipation through radiation.
  • Environmental Considerations:
  • Evaluate the ecological repercussions of the solar desalination system and strive for long-term viability. This may entail utilizing sustainable materials, implementing recycling techniques, and mitigating any adverse impacts on the local ecosystem.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and S.H.; Methodology, M.S. and S.H.; Software, M.S.; Validation, M.S.; Formal analysis, M.S., S.H. and D.A.G.; Investigation, M.S. and S.H.; Resources, S.H. and D.A.G.; Data curation, M.S. and S.H.; Writing–original draft, M.S. and S.H.; Writing–review & editing, S.H. and D.A.G.; Visualization, M.S. and S.H.; Supervision, S.H. and D.A.G.; Project administration, S.H. and D.A.G.; Funding acquisition, S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature

TermDescription
HTCHeat transfer coefficient
h w g c Convective HTC from seawater to glass, W per K per m2
h w g r Radiative HTC from seawater to glass, W per K per m2
h w g e Evaporative HTC from seawater to glass, W per K per m2
Q w g c Rate of convective heat transfer within seawater and glass, W/m2
Q w g r Rate of radiative heat transfer within seawater and glass, W/m2
Q w g e Rate of evaporative heat transfer within seawater and glass, W/m2
k b Basin thermal conductivity, W per m per °C
k i n s Insulation thermal conductivity, W per m per °C
ASurface area, m2
c p Specific heat, J/kg °C
I s u n Intensity of solar radiation, W/m2
l i n s Insulation thickness, m
l b Basin thickness, m
P w Partial saturated vapor pressure in seawater temperature, Pa
P g Partial saturated vapor pressure in glass temperature, Pa
T w Seawater temperature, °C
T g Glass temperature, °C
T b Basin temperature, °C
ρ Density, kg/m3
tTime, s
σ Stephan Boltzman, W/m2 °K4
ε e f f Emissivity

References

  1. Angappan, G.; Pandiaraj, S.; Alrubaie, A.J.; Muthusamy, S.; Said, Z.; Panchal, H.; Katekar, V.P.; Shoeibi, S.; Kabeel, A.E. Investigation on Solar Still with Integration of Solar Cooker to Enhance Productivity: Experimental, Exergy, and Economic Analysis. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 51, 103470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abdullah, A.S.; Panchal, H.; Alawee, W.H.; Omara, Z.M. Methods Used to Improve Solar Still Performance with Generated Turbulence for Water Desalination- Detailed Review. Results Eng. 2023, 19, 101251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Panchal, H.; Nurdiyanto, H.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Hishan, S.S.; Essa, F.A.; Khalid, M.; Dharaskar, S.; Shanmugan, S. Experimental Investigation on the Yield of Solar Still Using Manganese Oxide Nanoparticles Coated Absorber. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 25, 100905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. UNICEF Water and the Global Climate Crisis: 10 Things You Should Know. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/stories/water-and-climate-change-10-things-you-should-know?gclid=CjwKCAiAgeeqBhBAEiwAoDDhn_GhPkfm7QkiXzjceFMDu7CVPdMBZZHXKCe-iJTh5_uoSxGeCZ4_iBoCVykQAvD_BwE (accessed on 15 October 2023).
  5. United Nation Summary Progress Update 2021: SDG 6—Water and Sanitation for All. In The UN-Water Integrated Monitoring Initiative; UN-Water: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 1–58.
  6. FAO Overcoming Water Challenges in Agriculture. Available online: https://www.fao.org/state-of-food-agriculture/2020/en/ (accessed on 5 October 2023).
  7. Hossein, K.; Nazeri Tahroudi, M. Annual and Seasonal Distribution Pattern of Rainfall in Iran and Neighboring Regions. Arab. J. Geosci. 2019, 12, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khani, S.M.R.; Bahadori, M.; Dehghani-Sanij, A. Experimental Investigation of a Modular Wind Tower in Hot and Dry Regions. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2017, 39, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Omiddezyani, S.; Dehghani, Z.; Ahmadi, P.; Ashjaee, M.; Houshfar, E. Design and Optimization of an Integrated Novel Desalination System Based on the Temperature Difference between the Sea and Mountain. Sol. Energy 2023, 258, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Soltani, M.; Moradi Kashkooli, F.; Dehghani-Sanij, A.R.; Nokhosteen, A.; Ahmadi-Joughi, A.; Gharali, K.; Mahbaz, S.B.; Dusseault, M.B. A Comprehensive Review of Geothermal Energy Evolution and Development. Int. J. Green Energy 2019, 16, 971–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dehghani-Sanij, A.R.; MacLachlan, S.; Naterer, G.F.; Muzychka, Y.S.; Haynes, R.D.; Enjilela, V. Multistage Cooling and Freezing of a Saline Spherical Water Droplet. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2020, 147, 106095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abadi, M.M.; Izadi, I.; Jalili, B. Numerical Analysis of a Multi-Stage Evacuation Desalination in Tehran City. Water Energy Int. 2019, 61, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  13. Karimi, H.; Adibhesami, M.A.; Bazazzadeh, H.; Movafagh, S. Green Buildings: Human-Centered and Energy Efficiency Optimization Strategies. Energies 2023, 16, 3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Capellán-Pérez, I.; Campos-Celador, Á.; Terés-Zubiaga, J. Renewable Energy Cooperatives as an Instrument towards the Energy Transition in Spain. Energy Policy 2018, 123, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dehghani-Sanij, A.; Kashkooli, F.M. Special Issue: New Developments and Prospects in Clean and Renewable Energies. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al Mallahi, M.N.; Assad, M.E.H.; Rejeb, O.; Delnava, H.; Asaad, S.; Tan, Y.C. A Review on Cleaning Techniques of Solar Photovoltaic Panels. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023, 2847, 40010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bellos, E.; Tzivanidis, C. A Review of Concentrating Solar Thermal Collectors with and without Nanofluids. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 135, 763–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdullah, A.S.; Alawee, W.H.; Mohammed, S.A.; Majdi, A.; Omara, Z.M.; Essa, F.A. Increasing the Productivity of Modified Cords Pyramid Solar Still Using Electric Heater and Various Wick Materials. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 169, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Esmaeilion, F.; Soltani, M.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Sohani, A.; Nathwani, J. Benefits of an Innovative Polygeneration System Integrated with Salinity Gradient Solar Pond and Desalination Unit. Desalination 2023, 564, 116803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wheatley, G.; Rubel, R.I. Design Improvement of a Laboratory Prototype for Efficiency Evaluation of Solar Thermal Water Heating System Using Phase Change Material (PCMs). Results Eng. 2021, 12, 100301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pambudi, N.A.; Nanda, I.R.; Saputro, A.D. The Energy Efficiency of a Modified V-Corrugated Zinc Collector on the Performance of Solar Water Heater (SWH). Results Eng. 2023, 18, 101174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mawire, A.; Lentswe, K.; Owusu, P. Performance of Two Solar Cooking Storage Pots Using Parabolic Dish Solar Concentrators during Solar and Storage Cooking Periods with Different Heating Loads. Results Eng. 2022, 13, 100336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Verma, S.; Banerjee, S.; Das, R. A Fully Analytical Model of a Box Solar Cooker with Sensible Thermal Storage. Sol. Energy 2022, 233, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krabch, H.; Tadili, R.; Idrissi, A. Design, Realization and Comparison of Three Passive Solar Dryers. Orange Drying Application for the Rabat Site (Morocco). Results Eng. 2022, 15, 100532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, H.A.; Venkateswaran, H.; Kabeel, A.E.; Chamkha, A.; Athikesavan, M.M.; Sathyamurthy, R.; Kasi, K. Recent Advancements, Technologies, and Developments in Inclined Solar Still—A Comprehensive Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 35346–35375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Naghipour, D.; Taghavi, K.; Jaafari, J.; Kabdaşlı, I.; Makkiabadi, M.; Javan Mahjoub Doust, M.; Javan Mahjoub Doust, F. Scallop Shell Coated Fe2O3 Nanocomposite as an Eco-Friendly Adsorbent for Tetracycline Removal. Environ. Technol. 2023, 44, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Keshavarzzadeh, A.H.; Ahmadi, P.; Rosen, M.A. Technoeconomic and Environmental Optimization of a Solar Tower Integrated Energy System for Freshwater Production. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 121760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Han, M.; Zhang, J. Embodied Water Consumption between Typical Desalination Projects: Reverse Osmosis versus Low-Temperature Multi-Effect Distillation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alirahmi, S.M.; Rahmani Dabbagh, S.; Ahmadi, P.; Wongwises, S. Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Multi-Generation Energy System Based on Geothermal and Solar Energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 205, 112426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Amshawee, S.; Yunus, M.Y.B.M.; Azoddein, A.A.M.; Hassell, D.G.; Dakhil, I.H.; Hasan, H.A. Electrodialysis Desalination for Water and Wastewater: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cumo, F.; Astiaso Garcia, D.; Gugliermetti, F. Assessing the Potential Use of Solar Energy Source in Urban Areas Located in Natural Protected Sites. Nat. Resour. 2013, 4, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Do Thi, H.T.; Pasztor, T.; Fozer, D.; Manenti, F.; Toth, A.J. Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses. Water 2021, 13, 3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Assareh, E.; Delpisheh, M.; Alirahmi, S.M.; Tafi, S.; Carvalho, M. Thermodynamic-Economic Optimization of a Solar-Powered Combined Energy System with Desalination for Electricity and Freshwater Production. Smart Energy 2022, 5, 100062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shoeibi, S.; Kargarsharifabad, H.; Rahbar, N.; Khosravi, G.; Sharifpur, M. An Integrated Solar Desalination with Evacuated Tube Heat Pipe Solar Collector and New Wind Ventilator External Condenser. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 50, 101857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tanaka, H.; Nakatake, Y. A Simple and Highly Productive Solar Still: A Vertical Multiple-Effect Diffusion-Type Solar Still Coupled with a Flat-Plate Mirror. Desalination 2005, 173, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shoeibi, S.; Rahbar, N.; Abedini Esfahlani, A.; Kargarsharifabad, H. Improving the Thermoelectric Solar Still Performance by Using Nanofluids—Experimental Study, Thermodynamic Modeling and Energy Matrices Analysis. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shoeibi, S.; Kargarsharifabad, H.; Mirjalily, S.A.A.; Muhammad, T. Solar District Heating with Solar Desalination Using Energy Storage Material for Domestic Hot Water and Drinking Water—Environmental and Economic Analysis. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 49, 101713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sathyamurthy, R.; Ali, H.M.; Said, Z.; Kabeel, A.E.; El-Sebaey, M.S.; Gopalsamy, S.; Nagaraj, M.; Almasoud, N.; Alomar, T.S. Enhancing Solar Still Thermal Performance: The Role of Surface Coating and Thermal Energy Storage in Repurposed Soda Cans. J. Energy Storage 2024, 77, 109807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hassan, H. Comparing the Performance of Passive and Active Double and Single Slope Solar Stills Incorporated with Parabolic Trough Collector via Energy, Exergy and Productivity. Renew. Energy 2020, 148, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muthu Manokar, A.; Vimala, M.; Prince Winston, D.; Rajendran, D.R.; Sathyamurthy, R.; Kabeel, A.E. Year around Distilled Water Production, Energy, and Economic Analysis of Solar Stills—A Comparative Study. Heat Transf. 2020, 49, 3651–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rubio, E.; Fernández, J.; Porta-Gándara, M. Modeling Thermal Asymmetries in Double Slope Solar Stills. Renew. Energy 2004, 29, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, L.; Xu, Z.; Bhatia, B.; Li, B.; Zhao, L.; Wang, E.N. Modeling and Performance Analysis of High-Efficiency Thermally-Localized Multistage Solar Stills. Appl. Energy 2020, 266, 114864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Seralathan, S.; Chenna Reddy, G.; Sathish, S.; Muthuram, A.; Dhanraj, J.A.; Lakshmaiya, N.; Velmurugan, K.; Sirisamphanwong, C.; Ngoenmeesri, R.; Sirisamphanwong, C. Performance and Exergy Analysis of an Inclined Solar Still with Baffle Arrangements. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Baskaran, V.; Saravanane, R. Rendering Utility Water with Solar Still and Efficiency of Solar Stills with Different Geometry—A Review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kabeel, A.E.; Omara, Z.M.; Essa, F.A. Numerical Investigation of Modified Solar Still Using Nanofluids and External Condenser. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 75, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nazari, S.; Daghigh, R. Techno-Enviro-Exergo-Economic and Water Hygiene Assessment of Non-Cover Box Solar Still Employing Parabolic Dish Concentrator and Thermoelectric Peltier Effect. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 162, 566–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sadeghi, G.; Nazari, S. Retrofitting a Thermoelectric-Based Solar Still Integrated with an Evacuated Tube Collector Utilizing an Antibacterial-Magnetic Hybrid Nanofluid. Desalination 2021, 500, 114871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kabeel, A.E.; El-Maghlany, W.; Abdelgaied, M.; Abdel-Aziz, M. Performance Enhancement of Pyramid-Shaped Solar Stills Using Hollow Circular Fins and Phase Change Materials. J. Energy Storage 2020, 31, 101610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jeevadason, A.W.; Padmini, S. Experimental Investigation of a Passive Type Solar Still with Double Wedge Shape Glass Cover. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 56, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mevada, D.; Panchal, H.; Ahmadein, M.; Zayed, M.E.; Alsaleh, N.A.; Djuansjah, J.; Moustafa, E.B.; Elsheikh, A.H.; Sadasivuni, K.K. Investigation and Performance Analysis of Solar Still with Energy Storage Materials: An Energy- Exergy Efficiency Analysis. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2022, 29, 101687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hameed, H.G. Experimentally Evaluating the Performance of Single Slope Solar Still with Glass Cover Cooling and Square Cross-Section Hollow Fins. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2022, 40, 102547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Panchal, H.; Sohani, A.; Van Nguyen, N.; Shoeibi, S.; Khiadani, M.; Huy, P.Q.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Kabeel, A.E.; Shaik, S.; Cuce, E. Performance Evaluation of Using Evacuated Tubes Solar Collector, Perforated Fins, and Pebbles in a Solar Still—Experimental Study and CO2 Mitigation Analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 11769–11784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abdullah, A.S.; Omara, Z.M.; Essa, F.A.; Alqsair, U.F.; Aljaghtham, M.; Mansir, I.B.; Shanmugan, S.; Alawee, W.H. Enhancing Trays Solar Still Performance Using Wick Finned Absorber, Nano- Enhanced PCM. Alex. Eng. J. 2022, 61, 12417–12430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gupta, V.S.; Singh, D.B.; Mishra, R.K.; Sharma, S.K.; Tiwari, G.N. Development of Characteristic Equations for PVT-CPC Active Solar Distillation System. Desalination 2018, 445, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xiao, L.; Shi, R.; Wu, S.-Y.; Chen, Z.-L. Performance Study on a Photovoltaic Thermal (PV/T) Stepped Solar Still with a Bottom Channel. Desalination 2019, 471, 114129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kumar, S.; Tiwari, A. Design, Fabrication and Performance of a Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal (PV/T) Active Solar Still. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 1219–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. THE WORLD BANK Solar Irradiation and PV Power Potential Maps. Available online: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0039610/Iran---Solar-irradiation-and-PV-power-potential-maps (accessed on 22 November 2023).
  58. Thomas-Hillman, I.; Laybourn, A.; Dodds, C.; Kingman, S.W. Realising the Environmental Benefits of Metal–Organic Frameworks: Recent Advances in Microwave Synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 11564–11581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. The World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Group; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  60. The World Bank. Iran, Islamic, Rep; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mousavi, A.; Ardalan, A.; Takian, A.; Ostadtaghizadeh, A.; Naddafi, K.; Bavani, A.M. Climate Change and Health in Iran: A Narrative Review. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2020, 18, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Alamdari, P.; Nematollahi, O.; Alemrajabi, A.A. Solar Energy Potentials in Iran: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kabeel, A.E. Performance of Solar Still with a Concave Wick Evaporation Surface. Energy 2009, 34, 1504–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tiwari, G.N.; Dimri, V.; Chel, A. Parametric Study of an Active and Passive Solar Distillation System: Energy and Exergy Analysis. Desalination 2009, 242, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Halima, H.; Frikha, N.; Ben Slama, R. Numerical Investigation of a Simple Solar Still Coupled to a Compression Heat Pump. Desalination 2014, 337, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Edalatpour, M.; Aryana, K.; Kianifar, A.; Tiwari, G.; Mahian, O.; Wongwises, S. Solar Stills: A Review of the Latest Developments in Numerical Simulations. Sol. Energy 2016, 135, 897–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aldoori, W.H.; Ahmed, A.H.; Ahmed, A.M. Performance Investigation of a Solar Water Distiller Integrated with a Parabolic Collector Using Fuzzy Technique. Heat Transf. Res. 2020, 49, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Arun Kumar, S.; Kumar, P.; Sathyamurthy, R.; Manokar, A. Experimental Investigation on Pyramid Solar Still with Single and Double Collector Cover-Comparative Study. Heat Transf. Res. 2019, 49, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kalidasa Murugavel, K.; Sivakumar, S.; Ahamed, J.; Chockalingam, K.K.S.K.; Srithar, K. Single Basin Double Slope Solar Still with Minimum Basin Depth and Energy Storing Materials. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mehrpooya, M.; Ghadimi, N.; Marefati, M.; Ghorbanian, S.A. Numerical Investigation of a New Combined Energy System Includes Parabolic Dish Solar Collector, Stirling Engine and Thermoelectric Device. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 16436–16455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun Earth Tool Sun Earth Tool. Available online: https://www.sunearthtools.com/ (accessed on 20 October 2023).
  72. Zheng, H. Solar Energy Utilization and Its Collection Devices. In Solar Energy Desalination Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; ISBN 9780128054116. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ari, R. Active Solar Collectors and Their Applications; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1985; ISBN 0195035461/9780195035469. [Google Scholar]
  74. Khadija, Z.; M’barek, F.; Hicham, M. Effect of Metal Oxide Nanofluids on the Performance of Passive Solar Still Single Slope for Two Different Absorbent Plates. Heat Transf. 2022, 2, 101320. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Solar irradiation of Iran [57].
Figure 1. Solar irradiation of Iran [57].
Water 16 00355 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the energy balance of a single solar still slope and structure of the proposed system.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the energy balance of a single solar still slope and structure of the proposed system.
Water 16 00355 g002
Figure 3. Describing new pathway of water.
Figure 3. Describing new pathway of water.
Water 16 00355 g003
Figure 5. Solar irradiation angle in the south of Iran [71].
Figure 5. Solar irradiation angle in the south of Iran [71].
Water 16 00355 g005
Figure 6. Definition of focal area concept [72].
Figure 6. Definition of focal area concept [72].
Water 16 00355 g006
Figure 7. Model and calculation comparison with previously published research [74].
Figure 7. Model and calculation comparison with previously published research [74].
Water 16 00355 g007
Figure 8. The solar energy input to the basin of the solar still considering the reflection.
Figure 8. The solar energy input to the basin of the solar still considering the reflection.
Water 16 00355 g008
Figure 9. The temperature of the solar still systems.
Figure 9. The temperature of the solar still systems.
Water 16 00355 g009
Figure 10. Water production and cumulative water production per day of the proposed system.
Figure 10. Water production and cumulative water production per day of the proposed system.
Water 16 00355 g010aWater 16 00355 g010b
Figure 11. Energy efficiency of the systems.
Figure 11. Energy efficiency of the systems.
Water 16 00355 g011
Table 1. Numerical parameters [54].
Table 1. Numerical parameters [54].
ParameterValueParameterValueParameterValue
ρ g 2500 k g   m 3 ρ b 7800 k g   m 3 Water thickness1 cm
C p g 840   J   k g 1   K 1 C p b 460   J   k g 1   K 1 Insolation thickness5 cm
Glass thickness4 mmBasin thickness2 mmIsolation K i 0.059
α g (irradiation sorption)0.05 α w (irradiation sorption)0.05 α b 0.9
τ g (irradiation passing)0.9 τ w (irradiation passing)0.95 A b (area of the basin) m 2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soltanian, M.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Astiaso Garcia, D. Proposal of a Reflector-Enhanced Solar Still Concept and Its Comparison with Conventional Solar Stills. Water 2024, 16, 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020355

AMA Style

Soltanian M, Hoseinzadeh S, Astiaso Garcia D. Proposal of a Reflector-Enhanced Solar Still Concept and Its Comparison with Conventional Solar Stills. Water. 2024; 16(2):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soltanian, Mehdi, Siamak Hoseinzadeh, and Davide Astiaso Garcia. 2024. "Proposal of a Reflector-Enhanced Solar Still Concept and Its Comparison with Conventional Solar Stills" Water 16, no. 2: 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop