Next Article in Journal
SU(2) Symmetry of Qubit States and Heisenberg–Weyl Symmetry of Systems with Continuous Variables in the Probability Representation of Quantum Mechanics
Next Article in Special Issue
Surface Modifications of Nanofillers for Carbon Dioxide Separation Nanocomposite Membrane
Previous Article in Journal
Mirror Symmetry Breaking in Liquids and Their Impact on the Development of Homochirality in Abiogenesis: Emerging Proto-RNA as Source of Biochirality?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Porous Polyvinyl Alcohol Membranes: Preparation Methods and Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Symmetry
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/sym12071100
symmetry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Asymmetric Membranes: A Potential Scaffold for Wound Healing Applications

by
Seyyed Mojtaba Mousavi
1,
Maryam Zarei
2,
Seyyed Alireza Hashemi
3,
Seeram Ramakrishna
3,
Wei-Hung Chiang
1,*,
Chin Wei Lai
4,*,
Ahmad Gholami
2,
Navid Omidifar
5 and
Mansoureh Shokripour
6
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
2
Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71348-14336, Iran
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore
4
Nanotechnology & Catalysis Research Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
5
Biotechnology Research Center, and Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71348-14336, Iran
6
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71348-14336, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2020, 12(7), 1100; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12071100
Submission received: 29 May 2020 / Revised: 14 June 2020 / Accepted: 29 June 2020 / Published: 2 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Asymmetric Membranes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Currently, due to uprising concerns about wound infections, healing agents have been regarded as one of the major solutions in the treatment of different skin lesions. The usage of temporary barriers can be an effective way to protect wounds or ulcers from dangerous agents and, using these carriers can not only improve the healing process but also they can minimize the scarring and the pain suffered by the human. To cope with this demand, researchers struggled to develop wound dressing agents that could mimic the structural and properties of native skin with the capability to inhibit bacterial growth. Hence, asymmetric membranes that can impair bacterial penetration and avoid exudate accumulation as well as wound dehydration have been introduced. In general, synthetic implants and tissue grafts are expensive, hard to handle (due to their fragile nature and poor mechanical properties) and their production process is very time consuming, while the asymmetric membranes are affordable and their production process is easier than previous epidermal substitutes. Motivated by this, here we will cover different topics, first, the comprehensive research developments of asymmetric membranes are reviewed and second, general properties and different preparation methods of asymmetric membranes are summarized. In the two last parts, the role of chitosan based-asymmetric membranes and electrospun asymmetric membranes in hastening the healing process are mentioned respectively. The aforementioned membranes are inexpensive and possess high antibacterial and satisfactory mechanical properties. It is concluded that, despite the promising current investigations, much effort is still required to be done in asymmetric membranes.

1. Introduction

The largest organ of the body is skin and its functions and structures can be affected by chronic wounds or traumatic events [1,2,3]. Under normal conditions, skin possesses a complicated multi-layer structure, which can be considered as a self-healing material [4]. Indeed, skin is an essential organ that can preserve the inner organs of the body from different mechanical, chemical, and pathogen insults. Other functionalities like supporting nerves and blood vessels, preventing dehydration, and regulating the temperature of the body are regarded as skin tasks [5]. Additionally, skin plays a fundamental role in sensory detection and immune surveillance processes [6,7]. Several reasons like chronic wounds, surgical interventions, acute trauma, or even genetic disorders lead to loss of skin integrity [8]. It has been demonstrated that scalds and burns can create deep and broad wounds. These wounds compromise body image and immunity and they lead to scarring, remarkable disability, and even death [9,10]. The annual World Health Organization’s reports have verified that more than 300,000 persons (per year) have lost their lives as a result of fire fire-related burn injuries [8]. Emergence and promotion of regenerative medicine during the last few years has led to a descending sequence in the mortality rate caused by burns However, the rate of mortality is not satisfactory (still high) and more efforts are required to minimize this rate [11].
Some of the most complicated and interactive processes in human life are repairing epidermal, superficial partial-thickness, deep partial-thickness, and full-thickness wounds [12,13,14]. Indeed this process can support intricate interactions between extracellular matrix molecules and other subtypes. Researchers have claimed that soluble mediators, different resident cells, extracellular matrix molecules, and infiltrating leukocyte subtypes can reestablish damaged parts and replace the lost area. For this purpose, five stages that include hemostasis, inflammation, migration, proliferation, and maturation [12] have been introduced for the wound healing process. Figure 1 represents various stages of the wound healing process.
As a result of previous explanations, researchers have made an effort to find a promising alternative for native skin that has a similar structure and functionality for wounds and injuries. Since broad skin loss can be considered as a major challenge to clinicians, autologous skin graft has been introduced in injuries treatments. Indeed these allografts are regarded as possible therapeutic alternatives, however, their functionality depends on religious grounds, availability of the skin banks, and standardized sterilization to reduce risks for patients [15]. Hence, researchers tried to find better alternatives for wound care, which are less painful and faster than previous technologies. Meanwhile, several items like clinical efficiency, low-cost, availability, patient safety, and ability to regenerate the native properties of skin were the most essential issues in the progress of new wound dressings [8,12].
Many different skin substitutes are already applied in clinical applications. The aforementioned cell-containing and cell-free skin substitutes can offer protection from contamination and fluid loss while they are able to deliver extracellular matrix components and cytokines to the wound bed. Moreover, wound dressings are applied as temporary coverings or remain permanently in the wound bed during healing or thereafter [15,16,17]. It is necessary to mention that in advanced skin regeneration techniques, cell biomaterials and growth factors are combined with modern biomanufacturing strategies, which can enhance the regeneration of healthy and vascularized tissues. Although there are promising advances in the field of cutting-edge skin substitutes and tissue engineering, a myriad of the innate features of native skin like specific cells, which can respond to the perception of pressure, cold, pain, heat, pigmentation, and vibration, have not been regarded. Other factors like strength and elasticity of the native skin have not been attained by the present methods. Researchers have attempted to combine stem cells with gene recombination. They stated that this combination could produce and deliver growth factors to the wound bed to overcome several limitations like physical inhibition and biological degradation of bioactive molecules. Hinrichs and coworkers were the first groups that proposed polyurethane-based asymmetric membranes to mimic the structural organization and properties of epidermis and dermis layers in the wound care process [18]. Asymmetric membranes impair bacterial penetration and avoid exudate accumulation as well as wound dehydration. In general, synthetic implants and tissue grafts are expensive, hard to handle (due to their fragile and thin nature) and their production process is very time consuming, while the asymmetric membranes are affordable and their production process is easier than previous epidermal substitutes. Despite that asymmetric membranes possess suitable wound-healing properties and acceptable biocompatibility, loading of these membranes with other bioactive agents like chitosan can enhance and promote the performance of such membranes.
Asymmetric membranes with extraordinary properties and high similarity with the native skin have gained tremendous attention and they have played a vital role in wound healing applications. In other words, the asymmetric membranes possess a denser outer layer that can imitate the epidermis skin layer, which protects the scarred area from bacterial, chemical, and physical threats and also manages the exchange of gases [19]. Additionally, the complete absorption of exudates and accurate management of cell adhesion and proliferation are performed by the interior layer of these membranes (these layers have porous structures) [20,21,22].
In addition to wound healing applications, asymmetric membranes are able to be utilized in other applications. These membranes with a small, thin, and pore size upper layer can facilitate a high vapor flux, and also they can manage high liquid entry pressure, which is essential for thermos osmotic energy conversion and membrane distillation processes [23]. It has been accepted that asymmetric membrane structures including porous substrates (effective for the surface exchange) and thinner dense layers are a beneficial choice to enhance the hydrogen separation performance. The obtained results have confirmed higher hydrogen permeability and stability of asymmetric membranes in comparison with symmetric membranes [24,25]. Very recently, a group of researchers fabricated a novel asymmetric membrane based on small intestinal submucosa. They stated that these novel membranes possess a bilayer structure with loose and dense layers, which can provide better mechanical stability and even wettability. The loose layer of the aforementioned membranes is suitable for the 3D proliferation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells, which can create better osteogenic effects in vivo. Since the preparation method is facile and these asymmetric membranes are available, they are expected to be favorable candidates for guided bone regeneration [26]. It is necessary to mention that asymmetric membranes with excellent properties are applied in various applications like filtration and gas separation [27,28].
So far many techniques including bioprinting, wet or dry/wet phase inversion, electrospinning, and scCO2-assisted phase inversion have been proposed for manufacturing asymmetric membranes [19]. It is necessary to mention that this wide range of methodologies for manufacturing asymmetric membranes can pave the route for the utilization of various polymers to promote asymmetric membranes. For example, hyaluronic acid, polyvinyl alcohol, collagen, polycaprolactone, and chitosan are considered as promising candidates for the production of these membranes. It has been accepted that non-degradable polymers used for the preparation of nanofibrous scaffolds included polyurethane (which can also be prepared in a degradable form), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [29], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [30], polyethersulfone (PES), and even polystyrene (PS) can be applied in wound healing. Non-degradable synthetic polymers also include hydrogels, such as poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and particularly poly(di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate) (PDEGMA). Moreover, degradable synthetic polymers like polylactides (PLLA and PDLLA) and their copolymers with polyglycolides (PLGA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) and its copolymers with polylactides (PLCL) are promising candidates for such applications. In terms of nature-derived polymers, chitosan with antimicrobial effects, hemostatic properties, high biodegradability, and biocompatibility is considered as one of the best candidates. The surface of chitosan is identified by platelets and only in a few seconds, the coagulation process begins with the protonated amine groups of chitosan attracting the negatively charged residues on red blood cell membranes, resulting on a strong agglutination, thrombin generation, and fibrin mesh synthesis within the microenvironment created by this polysaccharide [19,31,32,33]. Chitosan is an inexpensive and available natural polymer that can simply be loaded on asymmetric membranes and in our suggestion, the detailed and recent information about chitosan can be very useful in the development of chitosan-based asymmetric membranes. Here in this review, we try to explain the properties and preparation methods of asymmetric membranes and highlight the role of chitosan based-asymmetric membranes and electrospun asymmetric membranes in hastening the healing processes. We also suggest areas of future research that will help bring asymmetric membranes towards wound dressing applications.

2. Production Methods and General Properties

In the 1950s, a group of researchers proposed that asymmetric membrane could be achieved by cellulose acetate through the phase inversion approach [34,35]. Since then, the asymmetric membrane has gained tremendous attention and found many applications in various fields like gas separation, wastewater purification, dialysis, and wound healing process [23,36,37,38,39,40]. So far many methodologies have been explored and utilized by researchers in asymmetric membrane production. The major techniques (like bioprinting, scCO2-assisted phase inversion, electrospinning, dry/wet method, and wet-phase inversion technique) are illustrated in Figure 2. The bioprinting technique is one of the newest techniques that is proposed to combine fibroblasts and keratinocytes in asymmetric membranes [41,42]. Indeed, bioprinting cannot only provide acceptable flexibility in planning and production of tissue-engineered constructs but also allows the deposition of different cell types and biomaterials. In this technique, printing of individual layers assimilating the related skin cells is the key factor of asymmetric membrane production. In this condition, fibroblasts and keratinocytes are located in the bottom and top layers respectively (Figure 2d). [43,44]. Another technique that can enhance the deposition of polymeric solution and also produce an asymmetric membrane under the supercritical condition of CO2 amount is the scCO2-assisted phase inversion technique. It has been verified that membrane production is done when the scCO2 solubilizes in the casting solution, and then the removal of the solvent from the main solution occurs [45,46]. One of the best advantages of this technique is that by changing the conditions of processing like depressurization rate and concentration of the solution, many properties and features of the membrane such as hydrophilicity, porosity, morphology, and mechanical properties can simply be manipulated (Figure 2b).
The electrospinning method is capable to produce fibrous membranes that are equivalent to the native extracellular structure. After loading the main polymeric solution into the syringe and exposing it to the high voltage electric field, the solution is directed to the collector and finally, the nanofibers are produced. Many researchers have claimed that different factors like environmental conditions [47,48,49], processing variables (like the voltage, flow rate, and collector size) and characteristics of polymeric solution (e.g., solvent type, conductivity, and viscosity) can immediately influence the aforementioned process. Additionally, it is necessary to mention that by manipulating the material used and optimizing the nanofiber deposition items like orientation, density, and size, the properties of asymmetric membranes can be simply controlled [50,51,52] (Figure 2c). The last methodology that can be applied in the production of membranes is called the wet-phase inversion technique. This method includes the casting polymer immersion (under non-solvent coagulant bath) that can improve the deposition process and therefore main membranes are formed. One of the major factors that is influenced by the phase separation process’s duration is the formation of a porous sub-layer with a dense top layer [53]. However, the obtained membrane often demonstrates a thin top layer and some defects. Additionally, the dry/wet-phase inversion can begin the formation of the membrane under a pre-evaporation process before the polymer absorption into the coagulation bath. Indeed, this process can not only enhance the polymeric solution’s density but also a denser top layer is created that can protect the critical area of the wound from various contaminations [54,55,56] (Figure 2a). Figure 3 has summarized the advantages and disadvantages of all of the techniques.
The researchers have claimed that asymmetric membranes could not only repair different layers of skin but also they should fulfill several properties like antimicrobial activity, porosity, and mechanical properties. As is known, the presence of bacteria around the wound can delay or discontinue the process of wound healing and even this colonization by bacteria may endanger human life [58,59]. Hence, wound dressing or the presence of antibacterial agents [60,61,62,63,64,65] can control the growth of bacteria and it is the main property of asymmetric membranes. For example, Mousavi et al. in their review about gold nanostars have stated that these multi-branch materials can rupture the external membrane of bacteria and provide extraordinary antibacterial effects [66]. The porosity of wound healing agents can modulate the adhesion of cells and control their migrations. Besides, this property will fulfill the exchange of waste and nutrients around the wound [67]. The porosity values of 60%–90% have been proposed as the optimum values for promoting the wound healing mechanism [68]. Therefore, the upper surface of the membrane must include pores with a certain diameter to avoid wound infection [19]. It is necessary to mention that, these diameters should be sufficient enough for nutrients exchange and facilitate the penetration of the cells [69]. In terms of mechanical properties, stability and flexibility are considered as the main features to protect the wound from external risks. Previous researchers have proposed that the wound dressing agent must provide similar properties of native skin. For example, the wound dressing agent should fulfill a young modulus under extension, torsion and suction of about 4.6–20 MPa, 0.42–0.85 MPa, and 0.05–0.15 MPa respectively [70].

3. Chitosan Based Asymmetric Membranes

So far many polymers like collagen [71], cellulose [72], silk fibroin [73], alginate, and chitosan [74] have been applied to produce wound healing mechanisms due to their acceptable hydrophilicity and non-toxic effects. Other effective factors like drug release abilities, antibacterial, and biodegradable properties can hasten and facilitate the healing process. Among the aforementioned polymers, chitosan as a linear polysaccharide, which is derived from chitin has gained considerable attention in tissue engineering and skin-repairing applications (see Figure 4). Mi and collaborators [31] proposed the first chitosan based asymmetric membranes by a dry/wet-phase inversion technique in 2001. They have prepared the chitosan solution by acetic acid and then the final solution was per-evaporated for about 1 h (10–60 min) in 50 °C. Then the NaOH-Na2CO3 bath was used for immersion. The researchers have realized that the physicochemical properties of membranes can be influenced by duration of the per-evaporation process. Miguel et al. in their valuable review have explained all the aspects of chitosan properties as asymmetric membranes [57].
Chitosan sponges are capable to hold water and they possess extraordinary mechanical properties with high porosity. Since there are several amino groups in the structure of chitosan, this valuable material possesses potent bacteriostatic properties. However, it is necessary to mention that the solid-state chitosan sponge has a poor bacteriostatic effect that can limit its performance for chronic wounds. The incorporation of chitosan scaffold with metallic or non-metallic materials could be a promising candidate to enhance and promote the antibacterial effects. As summarized in Table 1, chitosan can be considered as a promising framework for skin repairing applications.
Very recently a group of researchers has proposed quaternary ammonium chitosan nanoparticles (TMC NPs/CS) with asymmetric wettability that can be applied in skin repairing applications [84]. These nanoparticles have been prepared by a simple multi-step method. Screening the acceptable concentration of chitosan sponges by considering the physicochemical properties was the first step. Then quaternary ammonium chitosan nanoparticles were incorporated with chitosan sponges and stearic acid was applied to modify one side of the mentioned sponges. These novel wound healing agents are not only available and nontoxic but also promote the antibacterial performance of chitosan sponges. Figure 5 has demonstrated the appearance of wounds in diabetic mice with bacterial infection and the results of an in vivo study of healed wounds. It has been confirmed that chitosan with extraordinary characteristics are potent agents for preventing the bacterial contaminations and they can facilitate the tissue growth process. Although many efforts have been made to promote wound healing agents, the incorporation of patient-derived skin cells or even stem cells can be considered as a suitable candidate for this purpose.

4. Electrospun Asymmetric Membranes

Researchers have verified that electrospun asymmetric membranes can be regarded as promising candidates for wound dressing because of their low degradation and satisfactory mechanical properties [85]. A biocompatible and biodegradable poly (α-ester) that can be broadly utilized in biomedical applications, especially wound dressing is polycaprolactone (PCL). Indeed, several physicochemical characteristics of this polymer like extraordinary spinnability, slow degradation, appropriate mechanical strength, and good hydrophobic properties have gained considerable attention in wound dressing [86]. It is necessary to mention that the role of poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) in different biomedical applications such as wound dressing, tissue engineering, and drug carrier has been highlighted during the last few years [87]. Such hydrogels like PVAc possess valuable functional groups, which are very biocompatible with tissues and body fluids. Riyajan and collaborators realized that the absorption capacity of PVAc capsules is satisfactory and they have verified its high (about 140%) swelling ratio after 15 h of exposure in aqueous medium [88]. Aragón et al. in their interesting experiment have stated that electrospun PVAc fibers were not being used before their report [57,89]. Most of the time, wounds need treatment with potent antibiotics because the presence of infection around the wound, which is mostly caused by sores, burns, or diabetic ulcers can prolong the duration of the healing process.
It has been observed that sustained local delivery can be a useful way because such local delivery setups can not only provide several advantages, but also they minimize the side effects. For instance, this delivery system enhances the efficiency of drug therapy and diminishes the frequency of bandage replacements, which is favorable to patients [87]. As a point, it can be stated that electrospinning is one of the most convenient methodologies that can simply incorporate compounds like antifungals, antiseptics, and antibiotics to the special polymer fibers. The appropriate relation between the surface area and volume and also high drug-absorption efficiency of electrospun membranes have made these membranes good agents for wound dressing [90].
The presence of microorganisms and antibiotic resistance are two major obstacles to wound management that can limit the therapeutic performance and even choices. So far many different natural products and herbal medicines have been introduced and utilized in related wound or ulcer treatments. Since ancient times, the extracts of the herbal medicinal plants are applied to hasten the healing process [86]. The researchers have claimed that thymol, eugenol, and carvacrol are regarded as major biological compounds of essential oils that have antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial, and antiviral activities [91]. Hence, Aragón and collaborators have proposed the polycaprolactone (PCL)/polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) asymmetric membranes that have been loaded with monoterpene carvacrol. The antibacterial effects of these novel membranes have been demonstrated in Figure 6A. Additionally, the evaluation of cell viability under the presence and absence of these membranes has been illustrated in Figure 6B. Consequently the researchers have proved that these novel membranes possess good mechanical properties, high antibacterial effects with acceptable fluid handling capacity, which can pave the route in the wound healing process [92].
A group of researchers have reported a new asymmetric membrane that was fabricated through the routine electrospinning method [56]. They have produced the top layer of the membrane with the combination of poly(caprolactone) and silk fibroin. Their goal was to reproduce the waterproof ability and dense nature of epidermis. Additionally, hyaluronic acid loaded with thymol and silk fibroin were applied to fabricate the bottom layer of these membranes. Based on the results that verify the wettability, biocompatibility, and good mechanical properties of the aforementioned membranes, it can be concluded that these membranes are very good candidates for wound dressing. The presence of thymol on the bottom layer of the membrane can promote the antibacterial and antioxidant effects of the final product as demonstrated in Figure 7. Although various properties belong to these membranes, it seems the incorporation of proteins and growth factors is a promising way to enhance the biological performance of such membranes.

5. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Asymmetric membranes with extraordinary properties and high similarity with the native skin have gained considerable attention and they have played a vital role in wound healing applications. In other words, the asymmetric membranes possess a denser outer layer that can imitate the epidermis skin layer, which protects the scarred area from bacterial, chemical, and physical threats and also manages the exchange of gaseous membranes. The major goal of this short review was to summarize the intrinsic properties and abilities of asymmetric membranes to act as wound dressing agents. Although there are several methods to produce these membranes, new preparation methods that are affordable and non-time-consuming are essentially required. It has been confirmed that electrospun and chitosan-based asymmetric membranes with extraordinary characteristics are potent agents for preventing bacterial contaminations and they can facilitate the tissue growth process. Nevertheless, although highly promising results obtained with chitosan-based asymmetric membranes, until now no ideal wound healing agent has been fabricated. Hence, researchers have concentrated on the fabrication of asymmetric membranes through the bioprinting technique. Despite the many efforts that have been made to promote wound healing agents, the incorporation of patient-derived skin cells or even stem cells can be considered as excellent candidates for this purpose. Additionally, the fabrication of novel asymmetric membranes with high antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, and antinociceptive properties can reinforce the wound dressing process and reduce the treatment duration. As a point, it can be stated that the inclusion of growth factors and proteins may be the key factor to enhance the biological performance of these membranes however is still obscure and needed more experiments to verify.

Author Contributions

S.M.M., M.Z. and S.A.H.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Writing—Review & Editing; W.-H.C. and C.W.L.: Validation, Resources, and Supervision; S.R., A.G., N.O. and M.S.: review, editing and revise. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was financially supported by the University of Malaya under Impact-Oriented Interdisciplinary Research Grant (No.IIRG018A-2019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peck, M.D. Epidemiology of burns throughout the World. Part II: Intentional burns in adults. Burns 2012, 38, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Madaghiele, M.; Sannino, A.; Ambrosio, L.; Demitri, C. Polymeric hydrogels for burn wound care: Advanced skin wound dressings and regenerative templates. Burn. Trauma 2014, 2, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Radhakrishnan, S.; Nagarajan, S.; Bechelany, M.; Kalkura, S.N. Collagen Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review. In Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 3–22. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yildirimer, L.; Thanh, N.T.; Seifalian, A. Skin regeneration scaffolds: A multimodal bottom-up approach. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Boyce, S.T.; Lalley, A.L. Tissue engineering of skin and regenerative medicine for wound care. Burn. Trauma 2018, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Clark, R.A.F.; Ghosh, K.; Tonnesen, M.G. Tissue Engineering for Cutaneous Wounds. J. Investig. Derm. 2007, 127, 1018–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ma, B. Treatment of Skin Aging and Photoaging with Innovative Oral Dosage Forms of Non-Hydrolized Carnosine and Carcinine. Int. J. Clin. Derm. Res. 2017, 5, 116–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shevchenko, R.V.; James, S.L.; James, S.E. A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. J. R. Soc. Interface 2009, 7, 229–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Han, G.; Ceilley, R. Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments. Adv. Ther. 2017, 34, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Minutti, C.M.; Knipper, J.A.; Allen, J.E.; Zaiss, D.M.W. Tissue-specific contribution of macrophages to wound healing. Semin. Cell Dev. Boil. 2017, 61, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Alemdaroğlu, C.; Deĝim, Z.; Celebi, N.; Zor, F.; Ozturk, S.; Erdogan, D. An investigation on burn wound healing in rats with chitosan gel formulation containing epidermal growth factor. Burns 2006, 32, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Boateng, J.S.; Matthews, K.; Stevens, H.N.; Eccleston, G.M. Wound Healing Dressings and Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 2892–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eming, S.A.; Martin, P.; Tomic-Canic, M. Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 265sr6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Eming, S.A.; A Wynn, T.; Martin, P. Inflammation and metabolism in tissue repair and regeneration. Science 2017, 356, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Catalano, E.; Cochis, A.; Varoni, E.M.; Rimondini, L.; Azzimonti, B. Tissue-engineered skin substitutes: An overview. J. Artif. Organs 2013, 16, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pereira, R.F.; Barrias, C.C.; Granja, P.L.; Bartolo, P.J. Advanced biofabrication strategies for skin regeneration and repair. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nyame, T.T.; Chiang, H.; Orgill, D. Clinical Applications of Skin Substitutes. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2014, 94, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hinrichs, W.L.J.; Lommen, E.J.C.M.P.; Wildevuur, C.R.H.; Feijen, J. Fabrication and characterization of an asymmetric polyurethane membrane for use as a wound dressing. J. Appl. Biomater. 1992, 3, 287–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Morgado, P.I.; Aguiar-Ricardo, A.; Correia, I.J. Asymmetric membranes as ideal wound dressings: An overview on production methods, structure, properties and performance relationship. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 490, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Priya, S.G.; Gupta, A.; Jain, E.; Sarkar, J.; Damania, A.; Jagdale, P.R.; Chaudhari, B.P.; Gupta, K.C.; Kumar, A. Bilayer Cryogel Wound Dressing and Skin Regeneration Grafts for the Treatment of Acute Skin Wounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 15145–15159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Tu, Y.; Ay, B.; Sun, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L. Chitosan-based asymmetric topological membranes with cell-like features for healthcare applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2634–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, Y.; Chen, C.; Hellwarth, P.B.; Bao, X. Biomaterials for stem cell engineering and biomanufacturing. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 366–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shaulsky, E.; Karanikola, V.; Straub, A.P.; Deshmukh, A.; Zucker, I.; Elimelech, M. Asymmetric membranes for membrane distillation and thermo-osmotic energy conversion. Desalination 2019, 452, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, L.; Liu, L.; Xue, J.; Zhuang, L.; Wang, H. Asymmetric membrane structure: An efficient approach to enhance hydrogen separation performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 207, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhuang, L.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Xue, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, H. Metalloid phosphorus cation doping: An effective strategy to improve permeability and stability through the hydrogen permeable membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 210, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; You, P.; Wang, M.; Tang, L.; Deng, Y. Development of a novel extracellular matrix membrane with an asymmetric structure for guided bone regeneration. Mater. Lett. 2020, 127926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Simon, S.; Espuche, E. Effect of different metal in situ growing routes on the morphology and gas separation properties of polyetherimide/palladium nanocomposite asymmetric membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 129, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Yao, J.; Li, Z.; Yang, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, S.; Sherazi, T.A.; Li, S. Bio-inspired fabrication of asymmetric wettability Janus porous membrane for secure F-oil infused F-free-membrane filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 566, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zulhairun, A.; Fachrurrazi, Z.; Izwanne, M.N.; Ismail, A. Asymmetric hollow fiber membrane coated with polydimethylsiloxane–metal organic framework hybrid layer for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 146, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Apel, P.Y.; Blonskaya, I.; Dmitriev, S.; Orelovich, O.; Sartowska, B. Ion track symmetric and asymmetric nanopores in polyethylene terephthalate foils for versatile applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B: Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2015, 365, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mi, F.-L.; Shyu, S.-S.; Wu, Y.-B.; Lee, S.-T.; Shyong, J.-Y.; Huang, R.N. Fabrication and characterization of a sponge-like asymmetric chitosan membrane as a wound dressing. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lih, E.; Lee, J.-S.; Park, K.M.; Thi, T.T.H. Rapidly curable chitosan–PEG hydrogels as tissue adhesives for hemostasis and wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3261–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kunio, N.R.; Riha, G.M.; Watson, K.M.; Differding, J.A.; Schreiber, M.A.; Watters, J.M. Chitosan based advanced hemostatic dressing is associated with decreased blood loss in a swine uncontrolled hemorrhage model. Am. J. Surg. 2013, 205, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Loeb, S.; Sourirajan, S. Sea Water Demineralization by Means of an Osmotic Membrane; American Chemical Society (ACS): Washington, DC, USA, 1963; Volume 38, pp. 117–132. [Google Scholar]
  35. Loeb, S. The Loeb-Sourirajan Membrane: How It Came about; American Chemical Society (ACS): Washington, DC, USA, 1981; Volume 153, pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, Z.-G.; Wan, L.-S.; Xu, Z.-K. Surface engineerings of polyacrylonitrile-based asymmetric membranes towards biomedical applications: An overview. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 304, 8–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Watenabe, K.; Yuasa, M.; Kida, T.; Teraoka, Y.; Yamazoe, N.; Shimanoe, K. High-Performance Oxygen-Permeable Membranes with an Asymmetric Structure Using Ba0. 95La0. 05FeO3− δ Perovskite-Type Oxide. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2367–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, F.; Hashim, N.A.; Liu, Y.; Abed, M.M.; Li, K. Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Peng, N.; Widjojo, N.; Sukitpaneenit, P.; Teoh, M.M.; Lipscomb, G.G.; Chung, T.-S.; Lai, J.-Y.; Chung, T.-S. Evolution of polymeric hollow fibers as sustainable technologies: Past, present, and future. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1401–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, C.Z.; Chung, T.-S.; Lai, J.-Y. A review of polymeric composite membranes for gas separation and energy production. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 97, 101141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, V.; Singh, G.; Trasatti, J.P.; Bjornsson, C.; Xu, X.; Tran, T.N.; Yoo, S.-S.; Dai, G.; Karande, P. Design and Fabrication of Human Skin by Three-Dimensional Bioprinting. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2014, 20, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. VijayaVenkataRaman, S.; Lu, W.F.; Fuh, J.Y.H. 3D bioprinting of skin: A state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes. Biofabrication 2016, 8, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ng, W.L.; Wang, S.; Yeong, W.Y.; Naing, M.W. Skin bioprinting: Impending reality or fantasy? Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. He, P.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Gou, Z.; Gou, M.; Li, X. Bioprinting of skin constructs for wound healing. Burn. Trauma 2018, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Morgado, P.I.; Lisboa, P.F.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Miguel, S.P.; Simões, P.C.; Correia, I.J.; Aguiar-Ricardo, A. Poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan asymmetrical membranes: Highly controlled morphology toward the ideal wound dressing. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 469, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ng, W.L.; Wang, S.; Yeong, W.Y.; Naing, M.W. Modification of polypropylene-starch blend by eggshell nano-particle, EVA and maleic anhydride to improve biodegradability and thermal properties. Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2017, 15, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sundaramurthi, D.; Krishnan, U.M.; Sethuraman, S. Electrospun Nanofibers as Scaffolds for Skin Tissue Engineering. Polym. Rev. 2014, 54, 348–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ahmadi-Aghkand, F.; Aziz, S.G.-G.; Panahi, Y.; Daraee, H.; Gorjikhah, F.; Aziz, S.G.-G.; Hsanzadeh, A.; Akbarzadeh, A. Recent prospective of nanofiber scaffolds fabrication approaches for skin regeneration. Artif. CellsNanomed. Biotechnol. 2015, 44, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pedde, R.D.; Mirani, B.; Navaei, A.; Styan, T.; Wong, S.; Mehrali, M.; Thakur, A.; Mohtaram, N.K.; Bayati, A.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; et al. Emerging Biofabrication Strategies for Engineering Complex Tissue Constructs. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mohiti-Asli, M.; Loboa, E. Nanofibrous Smart Bandages for Wound Care; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 483–499. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dong, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, K.; Yao, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Electrospun Nanofibrous Materials for Wound Healing. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lee, K.; Lee, S. Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes with Essential Oils for Wound Dressing Applications. Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 999–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, Y.; Yan, L.; Yuan, T.; Zhang, Q.; Fan, H. Asymmetric polyurethane membrane with in situ-generated nano-TiO2 as wound dressing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 119, 1532–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ding, L.; Shan, X.; Zhao, X.; Zha, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Cai, C.; Wang, X.; Li, G.; Hao, J.; et al. Spongy bilayer dressing composed of chitosan–Ag nanoparticles and chitosan–Bletilla striata polysaccharide for wound healing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 1538–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Poonguzhali, R.; Basha, S.K.; Kumari, V.S. Fabrication of asymmetric nanostarch reinforced Chitosan/PVP membrane and its evaluation as an antibacterial patch for in vivo wound healing application. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2018, 114, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miguel, S.P.; Simões, D.; Moreira, A.F.; Sequeira, R.S.; Correia, I.J. Production and characterization of electrospun silk fibroin based asymmetric membranes for wound dressing applications. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2019, 121, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Miguel, S.P.; Moreira, A.F.; Correia, I.J. Chitosan based-asymmetric membranes for wound healing: A review. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2019, 127, 460–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Joo, H.-S.; Otto, M. Molecular basis of in vivo biofilm formation by bacterial pathogens. Chem. Boil. 2012, 19, 1503–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Miguel, S.P.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Coutinho, P.; Correia, I.J. Electrospun Polycaprolactone/Aloe Vera_Chitosan Nanofibrous Asymmetric Membranes Aimed for Wound Healing Applications. Polymers 2017, 9, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mousavi, S.M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Zarei, M.; Amani, A.M.; Babapoor, A. Nanosensors for Chemical and Biological and Medical Applications. Med. Chem. 2018, 8, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mousavi, S.M.; Zarei, M.; Hashemi, S.A.R. Polydopamine for Biomedical Application and Drug Delivery System. Med. Chem. 2018, 8, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mousavi, S.M.; Zarei, M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Babapoor, A.; Amani, A.M. A conceptual review of rhodanine: Current applications of antiviral drugs, anticancer and antimicrobial activities. Artif. CellsNanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 1132–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Zonoubi, A.; Cn, P.; Perumal, D.V.; Mafibaniasadi, Z. In silico Analysis of Active Constituents of Silymarin as Αlpha-Glucosidase Enzyme Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2019, 12, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mousavi, S.M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Zarei, M.; Bahrani, S.; Savardashtaki, A.; Esmaeili, H.; Lai, C.W.; Mazraedoost, S.; Abassi, M.; Ramavandi, B. Data on cytotoxic and antibacterial activity of synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles using Malva sylvestris. Data Brief 2020, 28, 104929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tech, J.E.T. Investigating the Activity of Antioxidants Activities Content in Apiaceae and to Study Antimicrobial and Insecticidal Activity of Antioxidant by using SPME Fiber Assembly Carboxen/Polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS). J. Environ. Treat. Tech. 2020, 8, 214–224. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mousavi, S.M.; Zarei, M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Ramakrishna, S.; Chiang, W.-H.; Lai, C.W.; Gholami, A. Gold nanostars-diagnosis, bioimaging and biomedical applications. Drug Metab. Rev. 2020, 52, 299–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Karuppuswamy, P.; Venugopal, J.R.; Navaneethan, B.; Laiva, A.L.; Sridhar, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Functionalized hybrid nanofibers to mimic native ECM for tissue engineering applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 322, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, G.; Ushida, T.; Tateishi, T. Development of biodegradable porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2001, 17, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lee, J.W.; Han, S.S.; Zo, S.M.; Choi, S.M. Cellulose/poly-(m-phenylene isophthalamide) porous film as a tissue-engineered skin bioconstruct. Results Phys. 2018, 9, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zahouani, H.; Sohm, B.; Vargiolu, R.; Cenizo, V.; Debret, R.; Pailler-Mattei, C. Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skinin vivoby indentation and static friction tests. Ski. Res. Technol. 2009, 15, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, Y.; Jin, H.; Yang, F.; Jin, S.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Huang, J.; Wang, S.; Yan, Z.; Cai, X.; et al. Physicochemical, antioxidant properties of giant croaker (Nibea japonica) swim bladders collagen and wound healing evaluation. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2019, 138, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carvalho, T.; Guedes, G.; Sousa, F.L.; Freire, C.S.R.; Santos, H.A. Latest Advances on Bacterial Cellulose-Based Materials for Wound Healing, Delivery Systems, and Tissue Engineering. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, e1900059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sen, S.; Basak, P.; Sinha, B.P.; Maurye, P.; Jaiswal, K.K.; Das, P.; Mandal, T.K. Anti-inflammatory effect of epidermal growth factor conjugated silk fibroin immobilized polyurethane ameliorates diabetic burn wound healing. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2020, 143, 1009–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhao, W.-Y.; Fang, Q.-Q.; Wang, X.-F.; Zhang, T.; Shi, B.-H.; Zheng, B.; Mm, D.Z.; Hu, Y.-Y.; Ma, L.; Tan, W.-Q.; et al. Chitosan-calcium alginate dressing promotes wound healing: A preliminary study. Wound Repair Regen. 2019, 28, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Augustine, R.; Rehman, S.R.U.; Ahmed, R.; Zahid, A.A.; Sharifi, M.; Falahati, M.; Hasan, A. Electrospun chitosan membranes containing bioactive and therapeutic agents for enhanced wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Figueira, D.R.; Miguel, S.P.; De Sá, K.D.; Correia, I.J. Production and characterization of polycaprolactone- hyaluronic acid/chitosan- zein electrospun bilayer nanofibrous membrane for tissue regeneration. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2016, 93, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Bayat, S.; Amiri, N.; Pishavar, E.; Kalalinia, F.; Movaffagh, J.; Hashemi, M.; Hashemi, M. Bromelain-loaded chitosan nanofibers prepared by electrospinning method for burn wound healing in animal models. Life Sci. 2019, 229, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, Q. Functional poly (ε-caprolactone)/chitosan dressings with nitric oxide-releasing property improve wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2017, 54, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, K.-Y.; Liao, W.-J.; Kuo, S.-M.; Tsai, F.-J.; Chen, Y.-S.; Huang, C.-Y.; Yao, C.-H. Asymmetric Chitosan Membrane Containing Collagen I Nanospheres for Skin Tissue Engineering. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alavarse, A.C.; Silva, F.W.D.O.; Colque, J.T.; Da Silva, V.M.; Prieto, T.; Venancio, E.; Bonvent, J.J. Tetracycline hydrochloride-loaded electrospun nanofibers mats based on PVA and chitosan for wound dressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 77, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Amini, F.; Semnani, D.; Karbasi, S.; Banitaba, S.N. A novel bilayer drug-loaded wound dressing of PVDF and PHB/Chitosan nanofibers applicable for post-surgical ulcers. Int. J. Polym. Mater. 2018, 68, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liang, D.; Lu, Z.; Yang, H.; Gao, J.; Chen, R. Novel Asymmetric Wettable AgNPs/Chitosan Wound Dressing: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 3958–3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ahmed, R.; Tariq, M.; Ali, I.; Asghar, R.; Khanam, P.N.; Augustine, R.; Hasan, A. Novel electrospun chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/zinc oxide nanofibrous mats with antibacterial and antioxidant properties for diabetic wound healing. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2018, 120, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Xia, G.; Zhai, D.; Sun, Y.; Hou, L.; Guo, X.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, F. Preparation of a novel asymmetric wettable chitosan-based sponge and its role in promoting chronic wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 227, 115296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Georgescu, M.; Chifiriuc, M.; Marutescu, L.; Gheorghe, I.; Lazăr, V.; Bolocan, A.; Berteșteanu, Ș. Bioactive Wound Dressings for the Management of Chronic Wounds. Curr. Org. Chem. 2016, 21, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. García, A.D.P.; Cassini-Vieira, P.; Ribeiro, C.C.; Jensen, C.E.D.M.; Barcelos, L.D.S.; Cortés, M.E.; Sinisterra, R.D. Efficient cutaneous wound healing using bixin-loaded PCL nanofibers in diabetic mice. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 2016, 105, 1938–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jannesari, M.; Varshosaz, J.; Morshed, M.; Zamani, M. Composite poly (vinyl alcohol)/poly (vinyl acetate) electrospun nanofibrous mats as a novel wound dressing matrix for controlled release of drugs. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 993. [Google Scholar]
  88. Riyajan, S.-A.; Sakdapipanich, J.T. Encapsulated neem extract containing Azadiractin-A within hydrolyzed poly(vinyl acetate) for controlling its release and photodegradation stability. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 152, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Genevro, G.M.; Neto, R.J.G.; Paulo, L.D.A.; Lopes, P.S.; De Moraes, M.A.; Beppu, M.M. Glucomannan asymmetric membranes for wound dressing. J. Mater. Res. 2019, 34, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Basar, A.O.; Castro, S.; Torres-Giner, S.; Lagaron, J.M.; Sasmazel, H.T. Novel poly (ε-caprolactone)/gelatin wound dressings prepared by emulsion electrospinning with controlled release capacity of Ketoprofen anti-inflammatory drug. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 81, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Altiok, D.; Altiok, E.; Tihminlioğlu, F.; Altıok, D.; Altıok, E. Physical, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of chitosan films incorporated with thyme oil for potential wound healing applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2010, 21, 2227–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Aragón, J.; Costa, C.; Coelhoso, I.; Mendoza, G.; Aguiar-Ricardo, A.; Irusta, S. Electrospun asymmetric membranes for wound dressing applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 103, 109822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Symmetry 12 01100 g001 550
Figure 1. Major stages of the trauma healing process.
Figure 1. Major stages of the trauma healing process.
Symmetry 12 01100 g001
Symmetry 12 01100 g002 550
Figure 2. Four main methodologies for the production of asymmetric membranes: (a) dry/wet, (b) scCO2-assisted phase inversion, (c) electrospinning, and (d) bioprinting [57].
Figure 2. Four main methodologies for the production of asymmetric membranes: (a) dry/wet, (b) scCO2-assisted phase inversion, (c) electrospinning, and (d) bioprinting [57].
Symmetry 12 01100 g002
Symmetry 12 01100 g003 550
Figure 3. A summary of strengths and limitations of asymmetric membranes production methods.
Figure 3. A summary of strengths and limitations of asymmetric membranes production methods.
Symmetry 12 01100 g003
Symmetry 12 01100 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of chitosan-based asymmetric membranes’ preparation [75].
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of chitosan-based asymmetric membranes’ preparation [75].
Symmetry 12 01100 g004
Symmetry 12 01100 g005 550
Figure 5. The impact of TMC NPs/CS on the wound healing process of diabetic mice. (a) Bacteria isolated from the mice wounds. (b) In vivo study of healed wounds in diabetic mice on days 4, 7, 10, 13, and 16 for each treatment regimen. (c) Appearance of wounds in diabetic mice with bacterial infection [84].
Figure 5. The impact of TMC NPs/CS on the wound healing process of diabetic mice. (a) Bacteria isolated from the mice wounds. (b) In vivo study of healed wounds in diabetic mice on days 4, 7, 10, 13, and 16 for each treatment regimen. (c) Appearance of wounds in diabetic mice with bacterial infection [84].
Symmetry 12 01100 g005
Symmetry 12 01100 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Antibacterial effect of asymmetric membranes against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. (B) Evaluation of cell viability under the effect of carvacrol release by the wound healing assay in human dermal fibroblasts incubated without membrane (control; a,d,g,j), with Sample I (b,e,h,k) or with Sample II (c,f,i,l) at the different time points studied: 0 h (a–c), 24 h (d–f), 48 h (g–i), and 72 h (j–l). Scale bar, 500 μm [92].
Figure 6. (A) Antibacterial effect of asymmetric membranes against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. (B) Evaluation of cell viability under the effect of carvacrol release by the wound healing assay in human dermal fibroblasts incubated without membrane (control; a,d,g,j), with Sample I (b,e,h,k) or with Sample II (c,f,i,l) at the different time points studied: 0 h (a–c), 24 h (d–f), 48 h (g–i), and 72 h (j–l). Scale bar, 500 μm [92].
Symmetry 12 01100 g006
Symmetry 12 01100 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of electrospun asymmetric membrane’s production method (B) Investigation of the antibacterial activity of the SF_HA and SF_HA_THY nanofibrous layers against S. aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with SEM images of control, SF_HA and SF_HA_THY nanofibrous layers incubated with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa [56].
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of electrospun asymmetric membrane’s production method (B) Investigation of the antibacterial activity of the SF_HA and SF_HA_THY nanofibrous layers against S. aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with SEM images of control, SF_HA and SF_HA_THY nanofibrous layers incubated with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa [56].
Symmetry 12 01100 g007
Table
Table 1. Recent chitosan-based asymmetric membrane in the wound healing process.
Table 1. Recent chitosan-based asymmetric membrane in the wound healing process.
Membrane CompositionMain PropertiesFabrication MethodReference Number
Polycaprolactone- hyaluronic acid/chitosan- zeinHigh anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effectElectrospinning[76]
Chitosan/PVP/nanostarchHigh re epithelialization and collagen formation rateCoating by stearic acid and evaporation/casting techniques[55]
Bromelain-loaded chitosanCuring of burn woundElectrospinning[77]
poly(Ɛ-caprolactone)/chitosanTreatment of chronic wound caused by the ischemia.Electrospinning[78]
Chitosan-collagen nanospheresHigh swelling ratio and acceptable porosityFreeze-drying[79]
PVA/ChitosanExtraordinary antibacterial effect and great cytocompatibilityElectrospinning[80]
CS/Polyhydroxybutyrate/polyvinylidenefluorideTreatment of post-surgical ulcer Electrospinning[81]
Chitosan/AgNPsHigh Re-epithelialization rate with non- toxic effectStearic acid coating and freeze-drying [82]
Chitosan/PVA/zinc oxideUseful for diabetic woundsElectrospinning[83]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mousavi, S.M.; Zarei, M.; Hashemi, S.A.; Ramakrishna, S.; Chiang, W.-H.; Lai, C.W.; Gholami, A.; Omidifar, N.; Shokripour, M. Asymmetric Membranes: A Potential Scaffold for Wound Healing Applications. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12071100

AMA Style

Mousavi SM, Zarei M, Hashemi SA, Ramakrishna S, Chiang W-H, Lai CW, Gholami A, Omidifar N, Shokripour M. Asymmetric Membranes: A Potential Scaffold for Wound Healing Applications. Symmetry. 2020; 12(7):1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12071100

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mousavi, Seyyed Mojtaba, Maryam Zarei, Seyyed Alireza Hashemi, Seeram Ramakrishna, Wei-Hung Chiang, Chin Wei Lai, Ahmad Gholami, Navid Omidifar, and Mansoureh Shokripour. 2020. "Asymmetric Membranes: A Potential Scaffold for Wound Healing Applications" Symmetry 12, no. 7: 1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12071100

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop