Enigma of Pyramidal Neurons: Chirality-Centric View on Biological Evolution. Congruence to Molecular, Cellular, Physiological, Cognitive, and Psychological Functions

Abstract

The mechanism of brain information processing unfolds within spatial and temporal domains inherently linked to the concept of space–time symmetry. Biological evolution, beginning with the prevalent molecular chirality, results in the handedness of human cognitive and psychological functions (the phenomena known as biochirality). The key element in the chain of chirality transfer from the downstream to upstream processes is the pyramidal neuron (PyrN) morphology–function paradigm (archetype). The most apparent landmark of PyrNs is the geometry of the cell soma. However, “why/how PyrN’s soma gains the shape of quasi-tetrahedral symmetry” has never been explicitly articulated. Resolving the above inquiry is only possible based on the broad-view assumption that encoding 3D space requires specific 3D geometry of the neuronal detector and corresponding network. Accordingly, our hypothesis states that if the primary function of PyrNs, at the organism level, is sensory space symmetry perception, then the pyramidal shape of soma is the best evolutionary-selected geometry to support sensory-motor coupling. The biological system’s non-equilibrium (NE) state is fundamentally linked to an asymmetric, non-racemic, steady state of molecular constituents. The chiral theory of pyramidal soma shape conceptually agrees that living systems have evolved as non-equilibrium systems that exchange energy with the environment. The molecular mechanism involved in developing PyrN’s soma is studied in detail. However, the crucial missing element—the reference to the fundamental link between molecular chirality and the function of spatial navigation—is the main obstacle to resolving the question in demand: why did PyrNs’ soma gain the shape of quasi-tetrahedral symmetry?

Justification of Subject-Matter

What is the biological significance of chirality? To answer the question, we should take into account that the intricated system of the neuro-receptors and neurotransmitters (internal molecular chirality) of living organisms, recognize and perceive all life-essential changes in the external environment, biological part of each possesses predominant, biologically friendly form (L- isoform form for amino acids) of chirality. This striking biological chiro-centricity suggests the crucial role of cell chirality and, firstly, the chirality of brain primary neuronal cells PyrNs. Accordingly, our objective is to review what is known regarding the origin, forms, and significance of PyrNs chirality.

1. Introduction

Advances in molecular biology promise a new opportunity in developing artificial intelligence (AI) devices based on biomolecular building blocks (DNA and proteins) functioning in micro- and nanoscale. To achieve this goal, the broad-view revision of new results in diverse branches of biology is in demand.

Generalizing Darwinism to the Evolution of the Universe is a challenging and attractive idea, elevating the analytical description of biomolecular, cellular, and organism levels of events at new qualitative and philosophical levels. As an integrative approach, it is necessary and beneficial to understand the common principles of biological and non-biological existence, the hierarchical organization of biological systems, and the relations between biological and artificial intelligence. From the holistic view, space–time symmetry and relativity (STSR) are indispensable forms of existence, which can neither be created nor destroyed but only transformed, suggesting that physics and biology are imminently associated branches of science. The ground of the above-mentioned association is that the most common fundamental determinants of organic and non-organic objects are space, time, symmetry, and relativity.

Below, we will focus on the spatial symmetry determinant in biology, known as biological chirality (also referring to handedness) or biochirality. The importance of chirality is appreciated in many sciences, explaining many definitions of corresponding unique geometrical concepts. When biologists justly say that chirality is the critical feature in living organisms, the essential omitted objective fact is that chirality is also the key characteristic of the inorganic world and even a fundamental attribute of space and time, known as a primary determinant of existence. Therefore, attention to symmetry’s universal role is necessary to interpret life’s phenomena adequately.

Conservation and diversion of mirror or reflection symmetry is widely recognized as a fundamental mathematical tool and a universal degree of freedom in physical and the principal concept in biology [1,2]. Accordingly, symmetry’s physical roots appearing in biological patterns are frequently addressed, and a chirality-centric view of physical and biological processes steadily gains recognition. [3,4]. It is a common agreement that animal morphogenesis is regulated by the gene regulatory networks and functional requirements [5]. “Chirality is a central feature in the evolution of biological systems” [6]. Homochirality of biomolecules (DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids) is linked to the origin of life, i.e., to the beginning of biological evolution (Figure 1). Consequently, the entire hierarchy of biological processes (including bilaterality) can be associated with the interplay of molecular, cellular, and higher orders of biological organization, influenced by initial molecular chirality and factors related to the movement of organisms [7,8].

The ten groups of bilaterian organisms comprise two main clades: the protostomes and deuterostomes. The deuterostomes contain clades of olfactory (characterized by the origin of respiratory, sensory (olfaction), and neuronal systems insides) in Urochordata and Vertebrata.

The progress in the evolution of the locomotion, sensory system (and embryogenesis) started with olfaction in the olfactory, followed by the development of vision in both vertebrates, and bilateral vision preceded terrestrial life [11]. The end product of the bilaterian evolution is the integrated space–time chirality-oriented sensory-motor nervous system, which reached high efficiency in Vertebrata and brought advanced lateralized brain cognitive functions to humans. We want to know, “What is PyrNs’ role in the long-term evolution process, and what are their primary functions in the human brain?”.

2. Hierarchical Chain of Chirality Transfer

The stereospecific nature of living matter, beginning at the molecular level, from discriminating between the alternative enantiomers and culminating in the laterality of human cognitive functions, has long been viewed as the most striking feature challenging the curiosity of biologists, psychiatrists, and physicists [12]. The contemporary view on biochirality is based on the explicit integrative assessment of the spatial symmetry determinants persistently working in evolution and development. The association of molecular and cellular-level biological processes with mental health and illness points to the reciprocal relations between two opposite poles of the biological hierarchy, molecular biology (I) and the phenomenon of the conscious mind (V). Biological psychology (biopsychology, psychobiology, psychophysiology, neuropsychobiology) and biological psychiatry represent the branches of science dealing with this fundamental link. The molecular and cell physiology of pyramidal neurons (PyrNs) provides a natural bridge between molecular biology and higher cognitive and psychological function. At the cellular level, biological processes within CNS are grounded in the physiology and function of PyrNs [13]. In biology, many legitimate questions still need appropriate answers. But some questions have never been expressed. One such inquiry is why/how PyrNs, implicated in the spatial navigation of bilaterians, gain quasi-tetrahedral symmetry of soma. The objective reason for such silence is the combination of several factors. First, the long-time limited availability of molecular chiral discriminative tools. Second, an enormous volume of information describing the link between molecular chirality and brain laterality is dispersed in many scientific journals covering various sciences, from quantum physics and group theory to molecular biology and neurosciences. Third, the lack of a broader (generalized or philosophical) view on the subject matter (biochirality). This review is an attempt to improve the situation. In view of our hypothesis, the shape of soma is presumably associated with the tetrahedral geometry of homochiral biomolecular condensates. To my knowledge, the first attempt to approach this inquiry (examination) was made just recently [14]. In our view, the question should be resolved based on the understanding of the evolution of CNS [15].

The idea of the evolutionary link between molecular chirality (1) and brain laterality (2) immediately and inevitably catalyzes the question of the cause of PyrNs’ soma. The concept of the chain of chirality transfer is based on two complementary assumptions. First, state that every preceding step contains an internal determinant of the chirality of consecutive steps. The second assumes the existence of some fundamental driving force working on all levels of biological organization. Such fundamental force is sustained by ever-present space–time symmetry. Indeed, accumulating evidence indicates that universal space–time symmetry is manifested as chirality at the molecular, cellular, and all following levels of biological organization. The common-sense rule is that every chiral object (molecules, cells, neuronal networks, and others) is an efficient tool for discrimination of the left and right sides. Among the principal downstream factors contributing to pathways of biomolecular condensates is the geometry of chiral carbon atoms in proteinogenic AAs. Tetrahedral (sp3-hybridized) carbons with four different substituents are the principal components of biological molecules exhibiting homochirality. The chiral of carbon atom promotes the tetrahedral molecular assembly, also observed in DNA structures and the structure of “biological” water (Figure 1) [9,10,16,17,18]. Unfortunately, the geometrical definition of soma shape was not explicitly clarified. Consequently, whether the pyramidal shape of soma was evolutionarily selected or whether the current state is “an appendix of the CNS” has never been debated. Evolutionary selected biochemical homochirality is based on the chiral stereoselectivity of biosynthetic and metabolic reactions [19,20]. Chirality is the right keyword in the search for the integrity of PyrNs’ origin, structure, and functions. Such an assumption agrees that chiral asymmetry appears in nature at all levels, from elementary particles and AAs to mammals’ morphology and even galaxies’ levels [8,21,22]. The chirality of multi-dimensional elementary particles is the principal concern of string and gauge theories projecting beyond the Standard Model physics [23]. The well-known Feynman diagram reflects the space-chirality of multi-dimensional elementary particles, which is the principal concern of string and gauge theories projecting beyond the Standard Model physics [24]. The well-known Feynman diagram reflects space–time-dependent symmetry transformations in the elementary particle events. The origin of chirality at the cellular level is attributed to biomolecular homochirality [23]. Molecular homochirality and cellular chirality are the internal “forces” driving an organism’s left–right asymmetric development [23,24,25] in bilaterians. The hierarchical chain of chirality transfer from the atomic to the organism level is one of the challenging targets of contemporary biological sciences [26,27,28]. The attention to the possible all-embracing role of the symmetry determinant in biology (from the biomolecular chirality to the bilaterality of human cognitive function) has become a significant trend in cognitive neuroscience [22,29,30,31]. However, surprisingly, in this chirality-oriented stream of biological research, the question “Why/how does PyrNs gain tetrahedral geometry?” remains unarticulated, as mentioned before. In this situation, the value of questioning exceeds the value of the particular hypothesis because the first question triggers the string of the next one. The essential secondary-wave question is, “What is the mutual orientation of the corresponding PyrNs’ somas in the left and right hemispheres?” (Figure 2). Below, we introduce some relevant hypotheses based on the generalized view of biological symmetry. A broad view of biological symmetry assumes that chirality transfer from the molecular to macromolecular and cellular levels plays a vital role in physiology underlying perceptual and cognitive functions linked with the bilateral organisms’ emotional and behavioral expression [8,22,32,33]. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of psychological states are fast-developing branches of life science. From the time of Freud, Jung, and Assagioli, perceptual, cognitive, and behavioral functions have been considered the essential determinants of psychological processes [34,35,36]. Regardless of the view on the relationship between psychology’s cognitive and behavioral domains, it is commonly agreed that both exhibit a hierarchy, with the bottom referencing the basic sensory and perceptual processes and the top referencing the higher levels of cognitive and executive functioning control. From the top view, the hierarchical structure is the chain of downstream processes, including motor functions, perceptual abilities, neuronal circuits, and underlying molecular biology.

The animal mechanism of space and time perception (underlying interpretation of sensory inputs to activation of motor functions) within cellular, molecular, and cognitive levels significantly relies on the laws of space–time symmetry [8,37,38,39,40]. The perception of space, time, and symmetry are highly integrated into the complex evolutionary selected mechanism. The known examples are perception of motion and speed perception, involving spatial, temporal, and symmetry determinants of motion [41]. Fortunately, many experimental and theoretical situations allow for their study individually. Publications explicitly devoted to studying all aspects of spatial perception are the specific focus of our analysis. Unfortunately, for objective reasons, most space perception studies are conducted without attention to two essential aspects: perception of object symmetry and the hemispheric asymmetry of brain functions. Following this logic, the shape and functions of PyrNs deserve specific attention. Before considering the downstream molecular determinants, let us review fundamental upstream factors.

Space, Time, Symmetry, and Relativity

Throughout history, our notion of space and time has undergone dramatic transformations. Following the intuitive view of Euclid, Newton concluded that the external to the observer space is infinite, isotropic, uniform, perfectly penetrable, and immovable (i.e., absolute quantity), where he located the relative motion and studied its variation [42,43]. The Galilean principle of relativity formulated the first deviation from the intuitive interpretation of space and time. Later, the principle of relativity was complemented by the Noether theorem, framing the fundamental role of symmetry. All advanced physical theories directly or indirectly employ an inevitable link between four determinants of nature: space, time, symmetry, and relativity (STSR), bringing a deeper interpretation to the concepts of thermodynamics and entropy. As a consequence, the concept of STSR has gained attention in biology. Biological systems are structurally organized according to patterns repeated at each hierarchical level [44,45]. Notably and prominently, the most fundamental features, common for all hierarchical levels, are STSR and the notion of chirality, which plays a critical role as a specific form of geometric symmetry [7,45,46]. In this article, we assume that the unifying concept of STSR reflects the fundamental properties of nature [27,47,48,49,50,51] and primary determinants of life [8,47,52,53]. Now, we are prepared for an overview of the downstream molecular determinants.

3. Biological Evolution

3.1. General Trend

The new millennium in evolutionary science is characterized by fast advances in the view of the human brain–body laterality (handedness). Initially, many thought that left–right laterality (handedness) is an essential aspect of human brain organization, the basis of which is poorly understood [54]. In parallel, a complementary view was unfolding that during biological evolution, from om early bilaterians to extant humans, the brain exhibited a set of significant milestones of reorganization that enabled advanced adaptive behaviors. They are steering (taxis navigation), reinforcing (model-free reinforcement learning), simulating (model-based reinforcement learning), mentalizing (model of mind), and speaking (rhythmic semantic processing) [55]. Recently, many expressed a cautious assumption that “symmetries may have their origin in fundamental molecular asymmetries going far back in biological evolution [56]. Under the pressure of experimental evidence and looking at the roots and top of the evolutionary tree, we can bring this assumption to a more definite statement: lateralization of brain morphology and functions are the result of evolutionary selection having origin in fundamental molecular asymmetries and not less indispensable space–time symmetry of environment [8].

3.2. Molecular Chirality

Despite the long history of attention, the origin of the single chirality of the Earth’s biosystem is still referred to as a great puzzle. The first step in biological evolution was chiral selection at the molecular level. Molecular homochirality is secured by cellular functions (such as ribosomal protein synthesis). In turn, cell chirality is mediated by the prevalent chirality of the protein–enzyme complex. Molecular and cellular chirality interplay constitutes a stereospecific ground for the mixed analog–digital information procession in biological systems [57,58]. Molecular homochirality (more precisely, prevalent molecular chirality), feeding the roots of the evolutionary tree, pre-determines its branching structure and behavior of each individual sub-division (Figure 1) fall into two categories. One is searching for the possible coincidence of natural circumstances [59,60], and the second is for fundamental determinants of biological symmetry [8]. We will examine accumulating evidence in favor of indispensable causal force. Narrowing attention to the spatial symmetry at the molecular level, we can state that the majority of biological molecules (such as AAs and sugars) and macromolecules (including DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids) exhibit the prevalent form of spatial symmetry in three domains of geometry: chirality, fractality, and topology [61,62,63,64,65]. The enormous complexity of biochirality is illustrated by the fact that an entire complex of chiral molecules modulates diverse forms of cell chirality. An additional example of such complexity is the fact that molecular compounds of chiral and achiral structures frequently demonstrate strong chiro-optical and chiro-magnetic effects [66]. The most studied biomolecules implicated in the effects of chirality are proteinogenic AAs, enzyme–substrate protein complexes, and non-proteinogenic AAs in the CNS [67,68,69,70]. The chiral non-proteinogenic AAs play an essential role in the physiology of plants, insects, and animals. An example of non-proteinogenic chiral AAs is DOPA, which is part of the normal biology of some plants and all animals. Homochiral synthesis of L-DOPA isoform in humans occurs via biosynthesis from L-tyrosine (L-Tyr) by the tyrosine hydroxylase enzyme [71]. Protein stereochemistry is represented by two classes of stereoisomers: chiral enantiomers (prevalent L-isoform) and achiral diastereomers (prevalent cis-stereo-form). The range of chirality-specific phase transitions at the molecular level includes chiral inversion and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in diverse states of protein folding and aggregation. Evolution branched single-cell ancestors into two main domains of life: Procaryotes and Eukarya. Structurally and functionally, eukaryotes are organized into more hierarchical levels than prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) [72]. Protein chirality is strongly associated with the chirality of membrane phospholipids. The main component of biological membranes glycerophospholipids are glycerol-based phospholipids that have differential chirality: D-glycerol for bacteria and eukaryotes and L-L-glycerol for archaea [71]. At the cellular level, we restrict our attention to eukaryotes’ evolution, leading to the emergence of all neuronal cell types, including PyrNs (Figure 2). At the molecular level, we primarily focused on the contribution of protein handedness to the shape of PyrNs. The prevalent molecular chirality of organisms at the protein level occurs through the fine-balanced interaction of L-(major) and D-(minor) isoforms. Up-regulation of D-AAs is implicated in organism aging [68,69,73,74], psychiatric disorders [75], and cancers [76,77]. The most known adverse impacts are attributed to the up-regulation of three AAs: D-aspartic acid (D-Asp), D-serine (D-Ser), and D-alanine (D-Ala). All of them (and, potentially, by D-glutamate) are agonists for NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors of PyrNs [78,79,80,81,82,83]. The involvement of D-AAs in the physiology of PyrNs suggests their role as biomarkers in the spectrum of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders [75]. Continuous spontaneous and induced assembly of homochiral proteins from simple to complex arrangements includes the tetrahedral complexes [84] (well-known in the hemoglobin conformational dynamics) [85,86]. Notably, the tetrahedral geometry of molecular compounds is not accidental but is the consequence of the symmetry of atomic electron orbitals. But how tetrahedral molecular complexes can result in the pyramidal shape of soma remains unknown. We will return to this question later in the text.

Figure 2. (A–C) Pyramidal neurons morphology and orientation. (A) Pyramidal neurons (arrow) were identified by their large size, triangular shape, and the presence of a pially oriented apical dendrite opposite one or more basilar dendrites. The scale bar represents 10 μm. Adopted from [87,88]. (B) Arbitrary variants of PyrNs orientation in the bilateral brain may provide different spatial navigation information processing strategies. Most sensorimotor cortical neurons had typical vertically oriented apical dendrites that extended towards the pial surface [89,90]. (C) Orientation of PyrNs in column [91].

Figure 2. (A–C) Pyramidal neurons morphology and orientation. (A) Pyramidal neurons (arrow) were identified by their large size, triangular shape, and the presence of a pially oriented apical dendrite opposite one or more basilar dendrites. The scale bar represents 10 μm. Adopted from [87,88]. (B) Arbitrary variants of PyrNs orientation in the bilateral brain may provide different spatial navigation information processing strategies. Most sensorimotor cortical neurons had typical vertically oriented apical dendrites that extended towards the pial surface [89,90]. (C) Orientation of PyrNs in column [91].

3.2.1. Link of Physiological and Psychological Functions

Before closely considering PyrNs’ morphology, let us analyze their contribution to upstream biological processes. The cellular ground of association between brain physiology and psychology is the function of PyrNs. This means that PyrNs provide an opportunity for the basis of sensory processes (including visual, auditory, gustatory, olfactory, and cutaneous systems) to participate in the higher cognitive functions (such as emotion, learning, and memory) [92,93]. Indeed, populations of PyrNs were observed in low-level sensory cortices, including primary somatosensory, visual, and auditory cortex, with PyrNs located in high-level areas such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Such a conceptual view allows us to trace a link between chirality-dependent molecular events in PyrNs and their role in perceptual, cognitive, and behavioral aspects of psychological functions (PFs). Object perception or object recognition is the process of meaningful interpretation of the sensory input underlying our ability to act in the world. Psychophysical and physiological evidence suggests that object recognition relies on perceptual constancy, referring to the fact conservation of perceived geometrical characteristics of objects during relative motion of subject and object. Perceptual constancy is the invariance under spatial transformations and is closely associated with the mathematical definition of symmetries. Therefore, it is not accidental that the CNS of bilateral animals possess the specific neuronal mechanism of symmetry/dissymmetry perception [94,95,96]. Indeed, the mechanisms of sensory space–time perception and space–symmetry perception (characterized as perceptual constancy) are linked to the relativity principle and space–time symmetry. All forms of mathematical formalism (of Noether’s and all others) describing mechanical movement (space–time changes) are based on the particular variant (classical or quantum) of the relativity principle). This way, mathematical logic provides the explanation (understanding) of the relation between the objective physical world and its subjective sensory and mental representations. In other words, the relativity principle is the primary participant and designer of our sensory and cognitive (mental) representations [96]. In agreement with motion-related relativity, the mechanism of space–symmetry perception can be characterized as the frame of reference-dependent. Accordingly, sensory perception is a relative modality in general. The orientation in 3D space (also said attitude), based on the sensory representation system coupled with the motor control system, requires existence at three degrees of freedom (3-D-space) [97,98]. In humans, the mechanism of spatial information processing includes (a) two hierarchical channels of transformation (sensorimotor and cognitive) [98,99], (b) interaction of sensory (modality-specific), haptic, and kinaesthetic proprioception, and (c) utilizing the interaction of egocentric (intrinsic or attached to the body) or allocentric (extrinsic to the body) [97,100]. Prevalent molecular chirality plays a pivotal role in human physiology. It can be illustrated by the regulation of intra-body dynamics of D-AAs. It is well known that D-Ser is involved in biochemical processes, physiology, and morphology of the main organs of the body, including kidneys, liver, gut, urine, stomal, lung, and brain [13,20,101]. The dependence of CNS on D/L-AAs metabolism allows us to trace the interplay between physiology and complex perceptual, cognitive, emotional, and psychological functioning [32,34,100,101,102,103,104,105]. Analyzing the types of personalities, Jung differentiated them based on complex cognitive functions, including thinking, filing, sensation, intuition, and aesthetical judgment [29]. Expressions like psychological functions (PFs) or faculties, abilities, agents, states, conditions, and types, are widely used in psychological sciences and, to a lesser degree, in clinical practice.

3.2.2. Bilaterians: Symmetry–Function Interplay

Bilateria is the largest clade of animals characterized by bilateral symmetry during embryonic development. Bilaterians include insects, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, and most crustaceans. Bilateral symmetry (compared to other symmetry types) provides significant adaptive advantages for the efficiency of locomotion in three-dimensional environmental space. Although the intuitive understanding of mine elements of the phenomenon have been commonly shared for decades, the scientific formulation of this hypothesis begins only in the present [5,106,107].

A frequently circulating statement in the biological literature is “The human body and nervous system consist of seemingly symmetric left and right halves [105]. The word seemingly is critical because, in the language of geometry, two parts of the bilateral brain are asymmetrical (breaking of mirror symmetry)—the property named chirality, which is a key notion in the discussion of the morphology and function of bilateral organisms [108]. The evolutionary origin of CNS is a long-lasting fundamental question in biology. Genetic studies reveal that the Cambrian explosion, characterized by the full range of body plans across bilaterians, is linked to 157 bilaterian-specific genes, including the entire Nodal pathway (a key regulator of mesoderm development) and left–right axis specification of body plan and nervous system development [109].

Analysis of reviews devoted to the evolution of CNS (published from 2003 to 2023) reveals that most of them are concentrated on the bilateral organism without any reference to the molecular chirality and morphology of PyrNs. Only a few of them are focused on the morphology of PyrNs without attention to PyrNs’ soma shape, molecular chirality, and bilaterality of animal organisms—the situation explaining the motivation and objectives of our chirality-centric view on biological evolution (Figure 3).

From an evolutionary perspective, space–time memory, sensory-motor integration, and cognitive performance are dramatically increased in bilateral organisms. In the human brain, where these functions reach the highest level, the essential enhancements come from the division of labor between the left and right parts of the body and the two brain hemispheres. The first bilateral organisms originate in invertebrates. Invertebrates, characterized by more diverse molecular homochirality, differentiation of all 3-D body axes is promoted to more advanced forms, signifying progress in space perception, voluntary movement, and navigation. In humans, the conjunction of cognitive and psychological functions allows projecting all aspects of molecular biology and space perception of the areas of psychology and psychopathology [110,111]. Such a view brings us to the understanding that the bilateral CNS of humans unavoidably exhibits bilateral patterns of physiological, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functions underlying the psychological state of individuals (in health and disease conditions). It means that every individual has a window for the spontaneous and intended inputs influencing the state of bilateral CNS. This is practically exploited in bilateral/unilateral activation of the sensory system and corresponding cognitive functions in the healing of post-traumatic stress disorders [112] and mediating fear conditions [113]. The symmetry in biology is extended to the balanced arrangement of body parts around the 3-D axis. The Bilateria or bilaterians are animals revealing bilateral symmetry (chirality) from the embryonic state.

Neuroimaging studies reveal hemispheric asymmetry of association and limbic fiber tracts in utero [114,115]. The body plan of Bilateria has right and left sides that are mirror images of each other. The evolutionary origin of biochirality points to several major contributing factors. Three of them, relevant to the topic of our discussion, are prevalent molecular chirality, the necessity of space–time orientation of the moving body with the possibility to distinguish left and right (we point to the left/right because it is related to left–right mirror symmetry at the molecular level), a sensory system capable of space–time localization of objects representing food or social partner. From a biochirality view, it is essential to note that plants and animals, representing immobile and mobile organisms, exhibit different evolution pathways [116,117], which, in our view, are deferentially driven by the determinants of spatial symmetry. The focus of our consideration is specifically the evolution of mobile animal creatures.

According to fossil evidence, bilateral body symmetry in animals took place about 500 million years ago. In the course of evolution, the bilateral body inevitably leads to the bilateral CNS. This fact convinces many scientists that the laterality of brain functions cannot be accidental [118]. Symmetry in CNS is the balanced and co-related spatial arrangement of molecular, cellular, and anatomical components, providing the opportunity for the laterality of cognitive functions. The laterality of cognitive functions experiences the “symmetry pressure” from two sides: from the internal determinants and behavioral–environmental determinants. One is strongly associated with the genetic mechanism, and another evidently with epigenetic factors [119]. Epigenetics represents the network of molecular interfaces mediating gene–environment interactions [120]. In the language of symmetry, any epigenetic mechanism is the factor (symmetry changing factor) breaking genetically imposed homochirality of ribosomal protein synthesis [121]. Exploring human brain lateralization with attention to molecular chirality [31], cell chirality [122], genetics, and non-genetic factors in association with the underlying physical laws concerning space–time symmetry confirms that the origin of relative chiral homogeneity of biological molecules is somehow connected to the origin and evolution of life [21,30,113]. For moving bilateral organisms, persistent asymmetry in the activation of the sensory system (as the vision in the birds) becomes the environmental factor of the development of perception, cognition, and action, and, consequently, the object of intuitive attraction (attention). In humans, this attraction takes various shapes (attention, attraction, memory, addiction), from pragmatic skills of spatial orientation to aesthetic feeling. At the cellular level, molecular chirality is known as the factor promoting neuronal proliferation [123]. Space–time perception is the most influential force driving the direction of individual organism development and the directionality of biological evolution [22,124]. Both ontogeny and phylogeny can be traced at the molecular, cellular, and organism levels. In the case of humans, the interplay of prevalent molecular chirality and the sensory-motor functions is what drives evolution. Hence, the sensory-motor system’s mechanism supports higher cognitive abilities, consciousness, and psychological state. The human brain is the integrative bilaterally asymmetric machinery of space–time perception of moving organisms accompanied by executive function. In the CNS, the link of molecular chirality to the organism’s function at the cell level is mediated by multiple subtypes of neurons with unique morphologies, electrical properties, and molecular identities [25,125].

3.3. Cell Chirality

3.3.1. Cell Evolution

Prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells are descended from a single primordial ancestor but have a specificity at morphological and molecular levels. At the morphological level, eukaryotes contain a nucleus separating genetic material from the cytoplasm and cytoplasmic organelles. At the molecular level, prokaryotic and eukaryotes share two major classes of informational macromolecules: nucleic acids and proteins. After splitting animal–plant–fungi–protist pathways, animal cells of bilaterians undergo several steps of additional modifications. Bilateral organisms acquire signaling proteins necessary for neuronal proliferation, formation synapse, and CNS, allowing efficient environmental navigation and movement. In this sense, the human CNS is the final product of evolution. The tuning of spatial navigation occurs through the development of internal factors (including molecular diversity) and the appearance of sophisticated sensory systems that allow communication with the environment.

These two constantly interacting factors are the primary determinants of specific neuronal morphology, differing from the shape–functions links of other cell types, such as red blood cells.

3.3.2. Pyramidal Neurons

PyrNs within bilateral organisms are studied in reptiles, fish, birds, and mammals (Figure 1) [126]. PyrNs gain their name due to the easily recognizable geometrical shape of the soma. PyrNs’ soma shape is sharply distinct from other neuronal (Purkinje and granular cells) and non-neuronal (microglia, astrocytes, epithelial, or red blood cell) cell types. Based on this fact, it is reasonable to assume that the specificity of PyrNs’ functions accounts for this difference. The term PyrNs refers to all major classes of excitatory multipolar glutamatergic cell types sharing common (pyramidal-like) soma shapes despite the different degrees of deviation from the perfect geometrical form [127]. Even in the publications explicitly devoted to cell-kind-dependent chirality and cell morphology [122,123,124,125,126,127,128], the shape of PyrNs’ soma is out of discussion. In the most detailed description of the PyrNs’ soma shape, it is usually characterized as a “teardrop or rounded pyramid” [129], extremely elongated rod-shaped” [124], and most frequently pyramid-shaped [130]. The base geometry of the pyramid (triangular or square) is never experimentally explored or theoretically predicted. One of the best experimental images of PyrNs shows the pyramidal shape of soma (Figure 2A) [87,131]. However, confirmation of the tetrahedral geometry requires additional goal-oriented efforts. In such a situation, it is relevant to say that PyrNs’ soma has relative similarity with the pyramid’s geometry in general or tetrahedron, in particular. There are many arguments that the genetic chirality-centric architecture of the structural left–right asymmetry of the bilateral human brain is evolutionarily preserved for the optimum function of sensory perception of the spatial environment [132]. However, the tetrahedral shape of PyrNs may be induced by evolutionary tendency secondary to the sensory perception of the spatial environment. At the cellular level, space–time perception occurs through the activity of PyrNs in close collaboration with other cell types and first with the astrocytes. Astrocytes are gatekeepers for maintaining PyrNs’ excitability by glutamate biosynthesis, uptake, and release [88,133], synthesis of lactate (taken by neurons for energy production [134]), and as the primary source of D-Ser [135]. The disruption of astrocyte functions triggers cross-talk of many neurodegenerative pathways sharing a common feature—prevalent molecular chirality, which is vulnerable to spontaneous racemization. The primary functions of PyrNs include the evaluation of the distance, direction, and left–right discrimination of movement. In agreement with this view, the spatial arrangement of the PyrNs firing was found to be affected by environmental geometry [136]. Notably, aging-related cognitive deficits are attributable to the reduced activity of PyrNs [134]. Left–right discrimination of brain functions is well represented in the behavioral study [137,138]. This knowledge is supported by new results showing brain asymmetry at the molecular and cellular levels, but additional studies are required. PyrNs are the primary excitatory multipolar cell type abundant in the brain cortex [136], hippocampus [139,140], and amygdala [141]. Several PyrN types, characterized by functional division of labor, contribute to the brain’s systems for spatial navigation. Currently, the most studied is an interaction of cortical grid cells with the hippocampal place cell. Notably, grid cell fields comprise a directionally oriented, topographically organized, periodic two-dimensional triangular internal map of the external environment [142,143]. This model of neuronal space (direction, distance, symmetry) perception suggests that the mutual orientation of grid cells in a 2D map could presumably be functionally essential. However, the corresponding experimental evidence is currently unavailable.

The heterogeneity of the PyrN family is defined by their distinct axonal projections, dendritic arborization, and types of receptors. It was found that neurites, originating from the membrane protrusions of the neuronal soma, are the precursors of axons and dendrites (apical and basal). For PyrNs, specialization of neurites occurs at different times of neuronal proliferation. Apical dendrite and axonal initial segment come first, and basal dendrites, finalizing the pyramidal shape of soma, are formed later [12]. However, how the neuronal soma develops its pyramidal morphology, which directs the Proper neurite orientation, was poorly understood for a long time. Examination of all traditional graphical representations of the PyrNs community suggests that most (if not all) studies assume coherent orientation of soma in the plane orthogonal to apical dendrites axis [91]. However, such an assumption requires experimental verification.

The cortical circuit network predominantly comprises pyramidal-to-pyramidal neuron connections, yet their assembly during embryonic development has yet to be entirely understood.

PyrNs of the cortex are distributed in the sensory, motor, association, and executive areas and found in all cortical layers except layer I [11,144,145]. Each PyrN receives input from thousands of excitatory synapses segregated onto dendritic branches. It has been previously proposed that sophisticated neuronal circuits associated with non-linear properties of dendrites enable cortical neurons to recognize multiple in sequence patterns and robust sequence memory [146]. Dysfunctional PyrN circuitry has been associated with perception, cognition, and psychological conditions abnormalities. Glutamatergic signaling of PyrNs occurs through neurotransmitters AAs L-glutamate (L-Glu) [147] and D-Ser [148] in close interaction with the complex of catecholaminergic systems {with corresponding neurotransmitters: L-dopamine, L-norepinephrine (noradrenaline), and L-epinephrine (adrenaline)} [149]. Despite the involvement of neuronal circuits of different natures, the most significant contribution to the morphological asymmetry of brain hemispheres and left–right differentiation of neural pathways is attributed to PyrNs.

The fact that PyrNs are the most populated neuronal type in the human cerebral cortex and hippocampus suggests their primary role in processing space–time information utilized in sensory-motor functions. PyrN signaling is necessary for normal development and essential functions of mature organisms [150]. At the same time, the distortion of neuronal geometry and formation of aberrant synapses are associated with pathological conditions [151], including impairment of visual perception [152] and mental retardation [153]. The bilateral cortex and hippocampus, containing the majority of PyrNs, are studied in brain regions involved in a wide range of hemisphere-specific functions, including spatial coding, navigation, spatial memory, decision-making [152,153,154,155,156], and intelligence [157]. The evolutionary selected system for space–time information processing, including the morphology and spatial orientation of PyrNs, is the fundamental feature underlying the function of CNS. Experimentally observed hemispheric asymmetry of synaptic morphology of PyrNs explains well-known functional laterality of human perceptual and cognitive functions [158,159,160]. The morphology of PyrNs concerning the function was the focus of long-term attention in neuroscience. The major studied structural features were dendritic arborization, synaptic connectivity, and axonal network [120,160,161,162,163]. Apical and basal segments of the dendritic tree, complemented by the relative orientation of presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons, were carefully studied [17,25,136,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169]. Two dendritic arbors have distinct morphology and orientation and are involved in different synaptic circuits [135]. The dendritic orientation of PyrNs is sublayer-specific and exhibits dorsal-ventral and front-back differentiation [170]. The experimental parameters characterizing the cell body include soma size, spatial distributions, the density of soma, and pyramidal somatic integrative zones. The shape and spatial orientation of pyramidal soma have had little attention, partly due to the void of reliable experimental control. In bilateral organisms, beginning from C elegans, CNS contains PyrNs. During neurogenesis from the ventricular zone (VZ), before adopting pyramidal morphology, neurons pass through several intermediate stages (multipolar, bipolar) [171,172]. Presumably, many molecular correlates contribute to the pyramidal shape of soma, but all cell morphology alterations are supported/assisted by the molecular dynamics of homochiral enzyme–substrate complexes. A commonly accepted axiom is that molecular chirality drives cell chirality [173].

Experimental evidence suggests that such a chirality transfer occurs with the participation of diverse cytoskeleton-based, long-lived, and highly dynamic structures. Indeed, it was shown that the interaction of the different families of cytoskeleton filaments (septin [174], actin [175,176], microtubules [177,178], spectrin [173,177], and neurofilaments (NF) [179]) provides fundamental cell morphogenetic mechanisms, including the shape and spatial orientation of PyrNs’ soma [176]. It was shown that NF (and other intermediate filament proteins) contain in their N-terminal domains the motifs that bind unassembled tubulin. Peptides containing such motifs inhibit microtubules’ in vitro polymerization, leading to altered cell shapes [179]. This fact suggests that NF-microtubule interaction can contribute to the shape of PyrN’ soma.

Since 2014, spectrin has been recognized as a major component of the neuronal membrane skeleton participating in synaptic transmission [180]. However, until recently, there was no experimental evidence or theoretical model suggesting the direct involvement of any cytoskeleton components in the PyrN’ soma morphology. Notably, after publishing the preprint of our review, we found one article providing convincing arguments in favor of the contribution of the spectrin cytoskeleton network [180] in neuronal soma shape. The prominent candidates for attention are microtubule and actin cytoskeleton active in neuronal synapses [181,182]. Actin filament network is involved in vital neuronal processes associated with various memory functions in different organisms, from invertebrates to mammals. The cellular processes, mediated by its activity, include cellular motility, division, intracellular transport, synaptic plasticity, and morphogenesis [183]. Actin and actin-binding proteins (α-actinin and synaptopodin) are present in the typical cisternal organelle of an axon initial segment (AIS) in subpopulation PyrNs [184]. In agreement with our generalized function-based hypothesis, the recent publication shows that developing a pyramidally-shaped soma is linked to septin functions [185]. So, molecular mechanisms involved in the neurogenesis and the development of pyramidal neurons soma are on the way to being clarified in detail. The homochirality of actin–myosin cytoskeletons allows the cells to develop polarity and left–right asymmetry [173]. However, the bidirectional impact of prevalent molecular chirality (internal determinant) and bilaterality of CNS (window to the external epigenetic factors) on the pyramidality of PyrNs’ soma has never been considered. Notable that dendritic arborization exhibits cortical layer-dependent orientation preference towards the anterior orientation [161]. However, the spatial orientation of pyramidal soma in two brain hemispheres and their relation to space–time information processing have yet to be experimentally studied or theoretically discussed.

Based on the lateralization of perceptual and cognitive functions, we can expect differential bilateral asymmetry in the morphology and orientation of PyrNs. Indeed, currently, the hemispheric difference is experimentally observed in the number/volume [186] and synaptic organization [187]. Asymmetric hemispheric allocation of NMDA receptor subunits in hippocampal PyrNs complements the whole picture [135,137]. The fact that PyrNs of the healthy human brain have a significantly greater density and larger size and are more spherical in shape on the left than on the right side points to the meaningful link between two kinds of biological events [188]. Notable that bilateral asymmetry of brain activity indicates a state of the CNS system concerning mood and anxiety. For example, studies of brain EEG associated with PyrNs firing suggest that high levels of beta in the right hemisphere are associated with anxiety symptoms. In contrast, high levels of alpha in the left hemisphere indicate depressive features [189,190]. Studying PyrNs’ functions in biological information processing is necessary for designing a strategy [121,191].

3.4. From Molecular to Cell Chirality

We consider the evolution of life in terms of the sequence of transformation of molecular chirality into cell chirality and bilaterality of organisms [24,27,192,193,194]. Our hypothesis highlights the formal consequences of three co-existent events: molecular chirality, PyNs’ shape, and bilateral body–brain morphology [195]. Indeed, episodic memory, allowing mental navigation in space and time, is based on the hemisphere asymmetrical activity of hippocampal PyrNs [155]. At the same time, from a geometrical standpoint, PyN soma (with four non-equivalent vertexes) represents a highly asymmetric (chiral) tetragonal structure. The anatomical symmetry and asymmetry of the PyrNs’ structure impose fundamental information processing capabilities. The essential point is that two mirror images of PyrNs (two seemingly identical PyrNs) located in the cortex or hippocampus are not superimposable (i.e., not identical) (see Figure 2B). Furthermore, the chirality of PyrNs provides a formal opportunity for hemisphere-specific information processing contributed by correlative protein and lipid chirality [7,89,90]. Currently, no data confirm or negate any hemispheric asymmetry (amount, content, or chirality) of lipids in animal brains. Examination of all traditional graphical representations of the PyrNs community suggests that most (if not all) studies assume the coherent orientation of soma (within the brain hemisphere) in the plane orthogonal to the apical dendrites axis (Figure 2C) [91]. However, such an assumption requires experimental verification.

3.4.1. Self-Assembly of Biomolecules

The idea of molecular chirality contribution to the soma-shape of PyrNs is based on the fact that organic and non-organic molecular nanoscale complexes can spontaneously adopt various shapes, including square-pyramidal [196], triangular-prism [197,198], octahedral, icosahedral, and tetrahedral [199,200,201,202]. Indeed, after Le Bel and Van’t Hoff showed that the substituents of a tetravalent carbon center occupy the vertices of a tetrahedron, numerous experimental results illustrated that chiral covalent stereogenic units of molecular structures are responsible for the axial, planar, helical, and tetrahedral motifs in biological polymers [203,204]. Accumulating evidence shows the ability of biomolecules to self-assemble into the range of structures (from nanoscale to microscale) of distinct geometrical symmetry [205,206]. The mechanisms of self-assembly were studied for DNA [207], nucleic acids [208], proteins [209], phospholipids [210], and their combinations. The most common DNA nanostructures are tetrahedral DNA nanostructures (TDN). In the biological environment (cytosol), TDN exhibits maximum stability. The unique spatial structure of TDN allows it to penetrate cell membranes in abundance and regulate essential cellular processes, including proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Modifying TDN vertices, tetrahedral arms, or DNA tetrahedral cages by bioactive ligands enables TDN to be used as a nanocarrier for targeted therapies, molecular diagnosis, biosensing, antibacterial treatment, antitumor strategies, and tissue regeneration [207,210]. Peptides and proteins can also self-organize into highly ordered supramolecular architectures, such as nanofibrils, nanobelts, nanotubes, nanowires, and vesicles [211]. All facts mentioned above suggest the possibility of the natural occurrence of tetrahedral molecular aggregate in living cells as the molecular determinants of cell morphology and functions. A known example is the ferritin protein cages found in nearly all life forms. The most general structures show octahedral and tetrahedral symmetry [211]. Human ferritin cage has an outer diameter of ~12 nm and an inner cavity of 7–8 nm.

3.4.2. Molecular–Cellular Co-Evolution

Many physical and biological objects, including elementary particles (such as electrons and photons), molecular structures, and cell aggregates, have an intrinsic degree of freedom—chirality [203].

Evolutionary selected molecular chirality provides all available resources for the efficient mechanism of chirality transfers across all levels of biological organization [203]. Notably, the common symmetry principles guide the external and internal determinants of cell morphology, assembly, and functions of intracellular molecules. Understanding this fundamental commonality is necessary for neuroscience-inspired AI [212,213,214]. Protein assemblies adopting tetrahedral symmetry create shell-like architectures [215]. Such structures serve as enclosures for viral genomes and potentially can serve as internal determinants of cell shape. In addition to ferritins [208,216], well-known examples of tetrahedral protein assembly are small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) [217] and globular hemoglobin (Hb) [218,219,220,221,222]. Hb is a highly conserved globular protein in all life forms and functionally tied to aerobic organisms utilizing oxygen from the atmosphere and delivering it to cells. The expression of mitochondrial Hb (Hba-a2 and Hbb) in neurons (including nigral dopaminergic neurons, striatal γ-aminobutyric acid GABA-ergic neurons, and cortical PyrNs) was experimentally observed [220,221,222,223]. Along with natural (organic) molecules, many artificial metal-organic tetrahedral (filled and porous) structures synthesized recently exhibit a chiral degree of freedom [224]. Porous molecular cages are successfully used for intracellular drug delivery [223]. Observation of amyloid beta peptides, which are prone to tetrahedral coordination of metal ions (including Cu, Zn, and Fe), suggests an active role of tetrahedral protein structures in cell physiology [225].

It is reasonable to assume that the shape of the soma can adapt to the demands of the cytoskeleton’s tetrahedral mesh-like gel, undergoing a chain of structural phase transitions [209,222,223]. In neuronal cells, the assembly of cytoskeleton proteins can be considered an internal determinant of soma’s shape. Cytoskeleton-based molecular (CMC) cages, as a form of membrane-bound and membrane-less organelles, are a well-known phenomenon in the cell physiology of intracellular segregation. CMC surrounds and protects various intracellular compartments, including the nucleus [226] and mitochondria [227], intracytoplasmic bacteria [228], and lipid droplets [229].

The diverse combination of cytoskeletal-based cages participates in intracellular physiology, including actin-based [226,229,230], vimentin-based [231], septins-based [231,232], and microtubules-based [229] complexes. There is no information about spectrin molecular cages. In many cell types (including PyrN), the liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of biomolecular condensates (proteins and lipids assemblies) is involved in diverse functions, including an asymmetric cell division, the establishment of neuronal stem cell (NSC) polarity, neuronal proliferation, synaptic transmission and, likely, soma morphology of PyrNs. It became evident that sophisticated biophysical and biochemical processes govern cell-environment (interface) chirality sensation in a living system. Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), differentiating into heart, gut, and brain tissues, show intrinsic [233] and extrinsic [234,235] cell chirality induced by the molecular (peptide–protein) chirality of intracellular and extracellular constituents. Accumulated experimental evidence related to different cell types suggests that the pyramidal shape of neuronal soma is a direct result of such bidirectional impact. The size scale range for protein–lipid tetrahedral complexes can be from several nanometers to several microns [220,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243]. Despite such a size being smaller than the size of PyrNs’ soma, these experimental facts point to a principal opportunity for the molecular structure to form the corners of pyramidal soma.

From a formal geometrical view, it is possible to compose a 3-D tetrahedral structure of unlimited size from the small tetrahedral units [239]. Notably, the chirality of elementary tetrahedron can be transferred to a larger-scale structure. Such tetrahedral units are known for biological and non-biological molecules. Presently, three types of biological tetrahedral structures containing proteins, DNA, and a mixture of both are widely explored [241] (tetrahedral structures for phospholipids are the next target for exploration). Protein-based tetrahedral structures comprise helical, beta sheets, and other components [244]. Therefore, theoretically, all studied protein-based tetrahedral structures can be assembled in three-dimensional cell-size complexes, supporting the shape of PyrNs.

When the base geometry of the pyramid (triangular or square) is never experimentally characterized or theoretically predicted, it is relevant to say that PyrNs’ soma is similar to the pyramid’s geometry in general or tetrahedron, in particular. However, additional experimental verification of such pathways is required. The co-appearance of all the above-mentioned spatial arrangements of PyrNs in the visual cortex suggests that the corresponding primary function is the involvement in the space–time orientation of moving organisms. In neuronal cells, the assembly of cytoskeleton proteins can be considered a primary internal determinant of soma’s shape.

Successful advances in understanding the development of neuronal morphology should be based on the attention to co-evolution at the molecular and cellular levels. Currently available data suggest that three types of vertebrates (cartilaginous fish, bony fish, and tetrapods) have an immediate relation to the evolutionary origin of PyrNs, which can be traced from simple, “extraverted” neurons in the amphibian pallium via pyramid-like neurons in the reptilian cortex to the fully developed neo-cortical elements designated by Cajal as “psychic cells” [245,246]. In both reptilian dorsal ventricular ridge (DVR) and mammalian amygdala, pyramidal neurons lack a preferred orientation, thus differing from cortical pyramidal neurons, which are oriented perpendicular to the surface [247,248,249].

4. Conclusions

The significance of spatial (i.e., geometrical) symmetry determinants in biology is supported by the fact that group theory is routinely used to describe the symmetries and conformational behavior of various systems ranging from the quantum mechanics of atoms, protein folding, neuronal signaling, and brain functions levels to organism–environment interaction [250]. The waves of new scientific evidence bring the research community to the conclusion that there is no cell type, tissue, organ, or system of organism indifferent to the physiological balance of molecular chirality [27,250,251].

In a broad sense, the “mystery” of PyrNs is on the way to being solved. As an integrating frame of reference, PyrNs’ hypothesis/theory will help guide future studies. What remains is the need for complex, goal-oriented experimental advances, focusing on the complex of stereospecific effects illuminating the link between molecular chirality (such as of L-/D-cytoskeleton dynamics in dendritic spines or chirality of mGluR7 receptors/ligands complex), the shape of PyrNs, and laterality of sensory perception. We have introduced readers to the spectrum of facts and thoughts, the fundamental link of which is frequently hidden from the diverse research audience. Now, it is time for your own judgment regarding the hypothesis on the consideration and for a new experimental design. Let us point attention to two areas of science where PyrNs’ hypothesis is in high demand. Until recently, one of the notable differences between biological and artificial intelligence systems was that bilaterians consist primarily of chiral molecules governing neuronal functions. Indeed, in the animal kingdom, the cognitive decision-making process is based on the same basic cellular elements of CNS—neurons as a unit integrating all advantages of prevalent molecular chirality to advance intelligence. Decades of molecular assembly-based nanotechnology linked with the chiral light–matter interaction dramatically changed the situation [252,253]. Evolutionary transitions between humans and AI fuel hope of symbiotic entities in the future and become a matter of fact [254].

In the prolonged period, the left–right asymmetry of the brain has been studied chiefly through psychological examination and behavioral study, leaving its molecular and synaptic aspects of PyrNs largely unaddressed. In 2008, Shinohara and colleagues showed that “hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell synapses differ in size, shape, and glutamate receptor expression depending on the laterality of presynaptic origin. CA1 synapses receiving neuronal input from the right CA3 PyrNs are larger and have more perforated PSD and a GluR1 expression level twice as high as those receiving input from the left CA3” [255]. After the first convincing evidence, many great studies were conducted to link synaptic hemispheric asymmetry to the function of PyrNs. For all of them, the knowledge of hemisphere-specific soma orientation could be beneficial [138,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267].

5. Closing Remark

We are only beginning to understand the enormous complexity of the link between molecular chirality and the laterality of cognitive functions. But progress is evident. The hypothesis of pyramidal soma shape is in conceptual agreement with the fact that living systems have evolved as non-equilibrium systems consuming environmental energy to maintain dissipating states of asymmetric chiral configurations and functions of organisms [266]. Recent developments show new details of neuronal proliferation. The choroid plexus (CP) (a group of specialized cells in the cerebral ventricles) is one of the first structures to show lateralization in human brain development. Corresponding inherent asymmetries in CSF production and circulation may impact the distribution of neurons and resident immune cells between brain hemispheres. The potential consequences associated with the pyramidal shape of neuronal soma and hemispheric asymmetry of neuronal proliferation responsible for asymmetry of neuronal connectivity and brain functional laterality have yet to be investigated [267,268,269].