Next Article in Journal
Timing, Provenance, and Tectonic Implications of Ore-Hosting Metasedimentary Rocks in the Giant Liba Gold Deposit, West Qinling Belt, China
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of the Fracturing Degree of the Source Rock on Rock Avalanche River-Blocking Behavior Based on the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian Technique
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heavy Mineral Sands Mining and Downstream Processing: Value of Mineralogical Monitoring Using XRD
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Value of Mineralogical Monitoring for the Mining and Minerals Industry

by
Uwe König
1,* and
Herbert Pöllmann
2,†
1
Malvern Panalytical B.V., 7602 EA Almelo, The Netherlands
2
Department of Mineralogy, Institute of Geosciences and Geography, Martin-Luther Halle-Wittenberg University, 06108 Halle, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Herbert Pöllmann passed away during the preparation of this Editorial.
Minerals 2022, 12(7), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070902
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 19 July 2022
The shift towards lower grade ore deposits, sustainable energy, CO2 reduction, volatile market conditions and digitalization has pushed the mining and minerals industry towards predictive, sustainable and agile analytical solutions to improve safety and increase operational efficiency. Therefore, fast and frequent mineralogical monitoring, geometallurgical modeling, and the prediction of process-related parameters provides value for mining operations.
Traditionally, quality control in mining industries has relied on time-consuming wet chemistry and on the analysis of elemental composition. However, the mineralogy ruling the physical properties of an ore is often monitored infrequently (if at all). The use of high-speed detectors has turned X-ray diffraction (XRD) into an important tool for fast and accurate process control, even for ores with a complex mineralogy. Recent statistical methods such as cluster analysis or partial least squares regression (PLSR) in combination with XRD raw data have become increasingly popular for handling large amounts of data and correlating process-relevant parameters directly with XRD measurements [1]. The next generation of information processing, new analytical sensors, and big data enables the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in the mining industry to further enhance performance and efficiency.
Mineralogical monitoring is already the standard method to control and monitor processes in other industries, such as cement manufacturing [2] and aluminum smelting [3]. This Special Issue of Minerals demonstrates the value of its applications for the mining and minerals industry. The focus is on so-called “green metals” such as nickel, lithium, copper, aluminum and titanium. These metals will be required for energy transition in the coming years.
Nickel laterite production is on the rise and is surpassing conventional sulfide deposits. The efficiency of mining and processing nickel laterites is defined by their mineralogical composition. Mineralogy plays a key role in the production of nickel metal from nickel laterites. The value of mineralogical monitoring for grade definition, ore sorting, and processing is explained by König [4].
As lithium cannot be analyzed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), this element is monitored by time-consuming wet chemical methods. The use of XRD for the quantitative analysis of lithium minerals and the recalculation of lithium content using statistical methods is discussed in the paper by Pöllmann and König [5]. In addition to addressing hard rock lithium ore analysis, more complex considerations on how to analyze lithium salt brines are included.
Quantitative XRD as a tool to monitor optimal blending and the detection of penalty minerals—which affect the flotation and concentration quality of copper ores—is described by Pernechele et al. [6]. The use of mineralogical monitoring for real-time decisions is discussed. The paper by Can et al. [7] on copper sulfides demonstrates the influence of pyrite mineralogy on the flotation process, and the possibility of developing alternative conditions to improve the performance of the process.
Available alumina and reactive silica are the main parameters controlling the beneficiation of bauxite, which is traditionally measured by laborious, expensive, and time-consuming wet chemical digestion. Alternative methods based on XRD analysis are evaluated by Melo et al. [8]. The potential of these methods industrially applied for rapid and automated quality control of bauxites is demonstrated. The use of mineralogical analysis of alumina-rich clays—covering the largest and most important bauxitic deposits of northern Brazil—as possible raw materials for the local cement and ceramic industry are discussed by Negrao et al. [9].
Heavy mineral sands are the source of various commodities, such as white titanium dioxide pigment and titanium metal. König and Verryn [10] provide information about the use of XRD to determine the composition of raw ores, heavy mineral concentrates, and titania slag. The paper highlights the importance of the fast and direct analysis of the phase composition due to the fact that the efficiency of the different process steps depends on the exact composition of the various titanium and iron phases and the different oxidation stages.
Otoijamun et al. study barite from selected locations in Nigeria [11] and aim to determine its suitability for various industrial applications. The paper shows the added value of XRD in developing beneficiation procedures, processes, and technologies for barite purification.
A systematic review concerning developing solutions based on machine learning to utilize mineralogical data in mining and mineral studies is given in the paper by Jooshaki et al. [12]. They highlight the importance of high-quality and extensive mineralogical information with respect to the increasing global demand for raw materials and evaluate the complexities of the geological structure of ore deposits and decreasing ore grades.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, U.K. and H.P.; writing—review and editing, U.K.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Degen, T.; Sadki, M.; Bron, E.; König, U.; Nenert, G. The HighScore suite. Powder Diffr. 2014, 29 (Suppl. 2), S78–S83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. König, U. XPERT: Rietveld and XRD; International Cement Review: Dorking, UK, 2008; pp. 118–122. [Google Scholar]
  3. König, U.; Norberg, N. Alternative Methods for Process Control in Aluminium Industries—XRD in Combination with PLSR. In Proceedings of the ICSOBA, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 3–6 October 2016; Available online: https://icsoba.org/proceedings/34th-conference-and-exhibition-icsoba-2016/?doc=58 (accessed on 5 July 2022).
  4. König, U. Nickel laterites—Mineralogical Monitoring for Grade Definition and Process Optimization. Minerals 2021, 11, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pöllmann, H.; König, U. Monitoring of Lithium Contents in Lithium Ores and Concentrate-Assessment Using X-ray Diffraction (XRD). Minerals 2021, 11, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pernechele, M.; López, A.; Davoise, D.; Maestre, M.; König, U.; Norberg, N. Value of Rapid Mineralogical Monitoring of Copper Ores. Minerals 2021, 11, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Can, I.B.; Özçelik, S.; Ekmekçi, Z. Effects of Pyrite Texture on Flotation Performance of Copper Sulfide Ores. Minerals 2021, 11, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Melo, C.C.A.; Angélica, R.S.; Paz, S.P.A. A Method for Quality Control of Bauxites: Case Study of Brazilian Bauxites Using PLSR on Transmission XRD Data. Minerals 2021, 11, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Negrão, L.B.A.; Pöllmann, H.; Alves, T.K.C. Mineralogical Appraisal of Bauxite Overburdens from Brazil. Minerals 2021, 11, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. König, U.; Verryn, S.M.C. Heavy Mineral Sands Mining and Downstream Processing: Value of Mineralogical Monitoring Using XRD. Minerals 2021, 11, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Otoijamun, I.; Kigozi, M.; Adetunji, A.R.; Onwualu, P.A. Characterization and Suitability of Nigerian Barites for Different Industrial Applications. Minerals 2021, 11, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jooshaki, M.; Nad, A.; Michaux, S. A Systematic Review on the Application of Machine Learning in Exploiting Mineralogical Data in Mining and Mineral Industry. Minerals 2021, 11, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

König, U.; Pöllmann, H. Value of Mineralogical Monitoring for the Mining and Minerals Industry. Minerals 2022, 12, 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070902

AMA Style

König U, Pöllmann H. Value of Mineralogical Monitoring for the Mining and Minerals Industry. Minerals. 2022; 12(7):902. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070902

Chicago/Turabian Style

König, Uwe, and Herbert Pöllmann. 2022. "Value of Mineralogical Monitoring for the Mining and Minerals Industry" Minerals 12, no. 7: 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop