Next Article in Journal
Genesis and Multi-Episodic Alteration of Zircon-Bearing Chromitites from the Ayios Stefanos Mine, Othris Massif, Greece: Assessment of an Unconventional Hypothesis on the Origin of Zircon in Ophiolitic Chromitites
Next Article in Special Issue
Origin of the El Dragón Selenium Mineralization, Quijarro Province, Potosí, Bolivia
Previous Article in Journal
Formation of Carbonate Nanoglobules by a Mixed Natural Culture under Hypersaline Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quijarroite, Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12, a New Selenide from the El Dragόn Mine, Bolivia

1
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam German Research Centre for Geosciences GFZ, DE-14473 Potsdam, Germany
2
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via G. La Pira 4, I-50121 Firenze, Italy
3
Eschenweg 6, DE-32760 Detmold, Germany
4
Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2016, 6(4), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/min6040123
Submission received: 4 October 2016 / Revised: 3 November 2016 / Accepted: 14 November 2016 / Published: 18 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Se-Bearing Minerals: Structure, Composition, and Origin)

Abstract

:
Quijarroite, ideally Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12, is a new selenide species from the El Dragόn mine, Department of Potosí, Bolivia. It most frequently occurs as lath-shaped thin plates (up to 150 µm in length and 20 µm in width) intimately (subparallel) intergrown with hansblockite, forming an angular network-like intersertal texture. Quijarroite is occasionally also present as sub- to anhedral grains up to 200 µm in length and 50 µm in width. It is non-fluorescent, black and opaque with a metallic luster and black streak. It is brittle, with an irregular fracture and no obvious cleavage and parting. In plane-polarized incident light, quijarroite is weakly pleochroic from cream to very slightly more brownish-cream, displaying no internal reflections. Between crossed polars, quijarroite is moderately anisotropic with pale orange-brown to blue rotation tints. Lamellar twinning on {110} is common; parquet twinning occurs rarely. The reflectance values in the air for the COM (Commission on Ore Mineralogy) standard wavelengths (R1 and R2) are: 46.7, 46.8 (470 nm), 47.4, 48.2 (546 nm), 47.1, 48.5 (589 nm), and 46.6, 48.7 (650 nm). Electron-microprobe analyses yielded a mean composition of Cu 13.34, Ag 1.02, Hg 7.67, Pb 16.87, Co 0.03, Ni 0.15, Bi 27.65, Se 33.52, total 100.24 wt %. The mean empirical formula, normalized to 25 apfu (atoms per formula unit), is (Cu5.84Ag0.26)Σ = 6.10(Hg1.06Ni0.07Co0.01)Σ = 1.14Pb2.27Bi3.68Se11.81 (n = 24). The simplified formula is Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12. Quijarroite is orthorhombic, space group Pmn21, with a = 9.2413(8), b = 9.0206(7), c = 9.6219(8) Å, V = 802.1(1) Å3, Z = 1. The calculated density is 5.771 g·cm−3. The five strongest X-ray powder-diffraction lines (d in Å (I/I0) (hkl)) are: 5.36 (55) (111), 3.785 (60) (211), 3.291 (90) (022), 3.125 (100) (212), and 2.312 (50) (400). The crystal structure of quijarroite can be considered a galena derivative and could be derived from that of bournonite. It is a primary mineral, deposited from an oxidizing low-T hydrothermal fluid at a f S e 2 / f S 2 ratio greater than unity. The new species has been approved by the IMA-CNMNC (2016-052) and is named for the Quijarro Province in Bolivia, in which the El Dragón mine is located.

1. Introduction

The Andes of Bolivia host two selenide occurrences of mineralogical interest: Pacajake, District of Hiaco de Charcas, and El Dragόn, Province of Antonio Quijarro, both in the Department of Potosí. The geology and ore mineralization of the El Dragόn mine was first explored by Grundmann et al. (1990) [1]. It is the type locality of eldragόnite, Cu6BiSe4(Se2) [2]; favreauite, PbBiCu6O4(SeO3)4(OH)∙H2O [3]; grundmannite, CuBiSe2 [4]; hansblockite, (Cu,Hg)(Bi,Pb)Se2 [5]; and alfredopetrovite, Al2(Se4+O3)3∙6H2O [6]. This Se mineralization also contains the recently discovered orthorhombic modification of CuSe2, petříčekite, as a late-stage phase [7].
This paper provides the description of a new species in the Cu−Hg−Pb−Bi−Se system, quijarroite, ideally Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12, from El Dragόn. The most frequently associated minerals include hansblockite, unnamed phase “C” [4], empirical formula Cu4HgPb2Bi4Se11 (normalized to 22 atoms per formula unit, apfu), clausthalite, PbSe, and watkinsonite, Cu2PbBi4Se8.
The new species quijarroite and its name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the IMA, proposal 2016-052. The holotype specimen, representing the X-rayed crystal, is deposited in the Florence Museum, catalogue number 3232/I. The polished section, from which the holotype crystal fragment was extracted, is housed in the collections of the Natural History Museum, London, catalogue number BM 2016, 26. The cotype material, consisting of a quijarroite-bearing section, is deposited within the Mineralogical State Collection Munich (Mineralogische Staatssammlung München, Museum “Reich der Kristalle”), inventory number MSM 73573.
The name is for the Quijarro Province in Bolivia, in which the El Dragón mine is located. Quijarro also hosts the world-known Porco Ag−Zn−Pb−Sn deposit, which has been in operation since the 1500s [8].

2. Geology

The El Dragón selenide occurrence is situated in southwestern Bolivia, in the Cordillera Oriental, some 30 km southwest of Cerro Rico de Potosí. The abandoned mine is located 19°49′23.90′′ S (latitude), 65°55′00.60′′ W (longitude), at an altitude of 4160 m above sea level. The adit of the El Dragόn mine is on the orographic left side of the Rio Jaya Mayu, cutting through a series of thinly stratified, pyrite-rich black shales and reddish-grey, hematite-bearing siltstones of probably Devonian age, dipping 40° to the north. The almost-vertical ore vein is located in the center of a 1.5-m-wide shear zone (average trend 135 degrees). In 1988, the selenium mineralization consisted of a single vein of small longitudinal extension (maximum 15-m-long gallery), ranging mostly from 0.5 to 2 cm in thickness.
The El Dragόn mineralization represents a multi-phase assemblage of primary and secondary minerals, among which Se-bearing phases are the most prominent [1,2]. The full list of minerals recorded from El Dragόn is given on [9]. A comprehensive survey of the mineralogy and origin of the El Dragόn mineralization forms the subject of a companion study [10], in this issue.

3. Physical and Optical Properties

Quijarroite most frequently occurs as lath-shaped thin plates (up to 150 µm in length and 20 µm in width) intimately (subparallel) intergrown with hansblockite and, rarely, unnamed phase “C” [4], forming an angular network-like intersertal texture (Figure 1). Phase “C” occurs in the interstices of the quijarroite/hansblockite intersertal intergrowths, often together with Co-rich penroseite, NiSe2, umangite, Cu3Se2, klockmannite, CuSe, watkinsonite, and clausthalite.
More rarely, quijarroite also forms sub- to anhedral grains up to 200 µm in length and 50 µm in width, occurring either alone in the matrix or intergrown with watkinsonite, clausthalite, eldragónite, krut’aite-penroseite, CuSe2-NiSe2, eskebornite, CuFeSe2, klockmannite and umangite (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Minerals occasionally being in grain-boundary contact encompass petrovicite, Cu3HgPbBiSe5, grundmannite, and native gold.
Quijarroite is black in color. The mineral is opaque in transmitted light and exhibits a metallic luster. No cleavage and parting is observed and the fracture is irregular. The density and Mohs hardness could not be measured owing to the small fragment size. The calculated density (for Z = 1) for the empirical formula (see below) and unit-cell parameters derived from X-ray single-crystal measurements is 5.771 g/cm3.
In plane-polarized incident light, quijarroite is weakly pleochroic from cream to very slightly more brownish-cream. The mineral does not show any internal reflections. Between crossed polars, quijarroite is moderately anisotropic with pale orange-brown to blue rotation tints (cf. Figure 3). Lamellar twinning on {110} is common; parquet twinning occurs rarely. Quantitative reflectance measurements were performed in air relative to a WTiC standard by means of a J & M TIDAS diode array spectrometer (J & M Analytik AG, Essingen, Germany) using ONYX software on a Zeiss Axioplan ore microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) (Table 1). Measurements were made on unoriented grains at extinction positions, leading to the designation of R1 (minimum) and R2 (maximum).
Reflectance percentages for the four COM (Commission on Ore Mineralogy) wavelengths (R1 and R2) are: 46.7, 46.8 (470 nm); 47.4, 48.2 (546 nm); 47.1, 48.5 (589 nm); 46.6, 48.7 (650 nm).

4. Chemical Data

Quijarroite was checked for concentrations of Cu, Ag, Pb, Hg, Fe, Co, Ni, As, Sb, Bi, S and Se. Quantitative chemical analyses were conducted in wavelength-dispersive (WDS) mode, using a JEOL thermal field-emission-type electron probe X-ray microanalyzer (FE-EPMA) JXA-8500F (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan). The probe was operated at 20 kV, 20 nA; the beam size was 1–2 µm. The counting time on the peak was 20 s, with half that time on the background on both sites of the peak. The following standards, emission lines and analyzing crystals (in parentheses) were used: Cu—synthetic Cu-metal, Kα (LIF); Ag—naumannite, Lα (PETJ); Pb—clausthalite, Mα (PETH); Hg—cinnabar, Lα (LIF); Fe—pyrite, Kα (LIF); Co—skutterudite, Kα (LIF); Ni—pentlandite, Kα (LIF); As—skutterudite, Lα (TAP); Sb—stibnite, Lα (PETJ); Bi—synthetic Bi2Se3, Mα (PETH); S—sphalerite, Kα (PETJ); Se—naumannite, Kα (LIF). The CITZAF routine in the JEOL software, which is based on the ф(ϱZ) method [11], was used for data processing. The composition of the grain used for the structural study corresponds chemically to the other grains analyzed by the microprobe. All grains are homogeneous within analytical error. Table 2 compiles the analytical data for quijarroite (mean of 24 spot analyses; range, and standard deviation). Table 3 provides a selection of microprobe spot analysis on quijarroite, together with the elemental detection limits (d.l.).
The empirical formula of quijarroite (based on 25 apfu) is (Cu05.84Ag0.26)Σ = 6.10(Hg1.06Ni0.07Co0.01)Σ = 1.14Pb2.27Bi3.68Se11.81. The ideal formula is Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12, which requires (in wt %) Cu 13.72, Hg 7.22, Pb 14.91, Bi 30.06, Se 34.09, sum 100.00.

5. X-ray Crystallography and Crystal Structure

Powder X-ray data (Cu Kα radiation) were collected with an automated CCD-equipped Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur PX single-crystal diffractometer (Oxford Diffraction, Oxford, UK) using a Cu Kα radiation (Gandolfi-type data collection). The measured and calculated (using the software PowderCell 2.3 [6]) powder diffraction patterns are given in Table 4. Unit-cell parameters refined from the collected data are as follows: a = 9.2376(8), b = 9.0176(7), c = 9.6198(8) Å, V = 801.34(8) Å3, Z = 1.
For the X-ray single-crystal diffraction study, a small crystal fragment (0.03 × 0.035 × 0.05 mm3) was handpicked from a fragment of the holotype specimen. The crystal was preliminarily examined with a Bruker-Enraf MACH3 single-crystal diffractometer using graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation. The data collection was then done with an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur 3 diffractometer (Oxford Diffraction) (X-ray MoKα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å) fitted with a Sapphire 2 CCD detector (Oxford Diffraction) (see Table 5 for details). Intensity integration and standard Lorentz-polarization corrections were done with the CrysAlis RED [12] software package. The program ABSPACK of the CrysAlis RED package [12] was used for the absorption correction. The merging R for the ψ-scan data set decreased from 0.165 before absorption correction to 0.041 after this correction. Reflections conditions (h0l: h + l = 2n; h00: h = 2n; 00l: l = 2n) were consistent with the space groups Pmn21, P21nm and Pmnm, and the statistical tests on the distribution of |E| values strongly indicated the absence of an inversion center (|E2 – 1| = 0.695). The structure solution was then initiated in the standard setting of space group Pmn21. The refined unit-cell parameters are a = 9.2413(8), b = 9.0206(7), c = 9.6219(8) Å, V = 802.1(1) Å3, Z = 1.
The position of most of the atoms (i.e., Pb, Bi1, Bi2, Se2, Se3) was determined from the three-dimensional Patterson synthesis [13]. A least-squares refinement using these heavy-atom positions and isotropic temperature factors yielded an R factor of 10.4%. Three-dimensional difference Fourier synthesis yielded the position of the remaining metals and the two Se atoms. The full-matrix least-squares program SHELXL-97 [13] was used for the refinement of the structure. Site-scattering values were refined using scattering curves for neutral species [14] as follows: Hg vs. Cu, Pb vs. ☐, Bi vs. ☐ and Se vs. ☐, for the Cu, Pb, Bi and Se sites, respectively. Cu1 has a population of Cu0.75Hg0.25, whereas Cu2 is occupied at 75% (cf. Table 6). The Pb and Bi sites were found fully occupied. The Se sites were found to be fully occupied by Se. At the last stage, with anisotropic atomic displacement parameters for all atoms and no constraints, the residual value settled at R = 0.027 for 1523 independent observed reflections (4σ(Fo) level) and 69 parameters and at R = 0.028 for all 2195 independent reflections. Inspection of the difference Fourier map revealed that the maximum positive and negative peaks were 0.42 and 0.76 e3, respectively. Wyckoff positions, site occupation factors, fractional atomic coordinates, and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) are given in Table 6. The main interatomic distances (Å) are reported in Table 7.
The crystal structure of quijarroite (Figure 4) can be considered a galena derivative. It can be derived from that of bournonite [15]. The bournonite isotypic series recently encompassed three members: bournonite, CuPbSbS3, seligmannite, CuPbAsS3, and součekite, CuPbBi(S,Se)3 [16]. The crystal structure of the latter is unknown but the similarity of the unit-cell parameters and the diffraction pattern with bournonite and seligmannite indicates that it is likely a member of this group. Overall, in their structure (orthorhombic, space group Pn21m), Pb forms 7,8-fold polyhedra, M3+ (M = Sb, As, Bi) forms trigonal pyramids, and Cu exhibits a tetrahedral coordination. All these polyhedra share corners and edges to form a three-dimensional network. CuS4 tetrahedra share corners to form chains parallel to [001]. In quijarroite, Bi fully occupies the two 2a Wyckoff positions usually occupied by As and Sb in seligmannite and bournonite, respectively, Cu enters the same tetrahedral 4b position (with an occupancy of three-fourths of the site; refined site population: Cu0.750.25), and Se fully replaces S at all the available anion positions. The most striking difference is what occurs at the Pb positions: In quijarroite only one of the two Pb positions of bournonite and seligmannite (2b Wyckoff position) is occupied by Pb, whereas the second is vacant and replaced by a general (4b) position occupied by Cu and Hg (refined site population: Cu0.75Hg0.25), showing an almost perfect linear coordination. A linear-coordinated mixed (Cu,Hg) site has been observed in some other phases, e.g., in the linearly coordinated Hg site of fettelite [17] or in rouxelite [18]. The linear-coordinated Cu/Hg atoms exhibit a mean bond distance of 2.342 Å, which leads to a bond valence sum (taking into account the parameters of Breese and O’Keeffe [19]) of 1.33 v.u. (vs. the ideal value of 1.25). The two Bi positions lead to 2.61 and 3.06 v.u. (for Bi1 and Bi2, respectively) and the Pb positions to a value of 1.74 v.u. The tetrahedral site exhibits a mean bond distance of 2.666 Å, which results in a bond valence sum of 0.73 v.u. (vs. the ideal value of 0.75, given the structural vacancy present at this site). If we compare the formula of quijarroite to that of the members of the bournonite group, we should write [Cu0.750.25][Cu0.75Hg0.25]Pb0.5BiSe3, which leads to Cu1.50Hg0.25Pb0.5BiSe3 (with Z = 4), or Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12 (with Z = 1). Quijarroite shows a strong enlargement of the unit-cell volume with respect to the members of the bournonite group (802.1(1) Å3 vs. 538.8, 551.7 and 559.7 Å3, in seligmannite, bournonite and součekite, respectively). This increase is mainly due to the presence of Hg and Se replacing S.

6. Discussion

The new selenium mineral resembles phase “A” of Paar et al. (2012), for which the empirical formula Cu5Pb2HgBi3Se10 (normalized to 22 apfu) was proposed [2,4]. The identity of quijarroite with phase “A”, for which no structural data were provided by Paar et al. (2012), is well displayed in a (Cu + Ag)−Hg−Bi diagram, where the mean compositions of both species overlap within analytical error (Figure 5).
The new mineral is chemically close to a species termed “Bi-rich petrovicite” [20] from the Schlema-Alberoda U-Se-polymetallic deposit (Erzgebirge, Germany). Normalized to 12 Se, it would have the formula Cu6.50Hg0.96Pb2.04Bi3.72Se12. This phase has also an orthorhombic cell, but different unit-cell parameters. If the structural data are correct, it might be a polymorph of quijarroite.
As to the physico-chemical environment of the formation of quijarroite, its commonly associated minerals provide little if any pT−x information. The stability relations of hansblockite and watkinsonite are largely unconstrained, and clausthalite has a broad stability field. Luckily, inferences could be made from the Cu selenides, with which quijarroite is occasionally intergrown. Thus, its association with umangite and klockmannite implies high selenium fugacities, above values defined by the umangite-klockmannite univariant reaction. At T = 100 °C and an elevated oxygen fugacity defined by the magnetite-hematite buffer, this relation would be consistent with a minimum log f S e 2 of roughly −14.5 [21]. The absence of end-member krut’aite and sulfides (chalcopyrite, pyrite) defines the maximum log f S 2 to roughly −19.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/6/4/123/s1, CIF: Quijarroite.

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by “progetto d’Ateneo 2014, University of Firenze” to Luca Bindi, Chris J. Stanley acknowledges Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/M010848/1 Tellurium and Selenium Cycling and Supply. D. Rhede (formerly GFZ) provided assistance with the electron-microprobe work. The reviewers are acknowledged for their constructive comments.

Author Contributions

Günter Grundmann collected the samples; Hans-Jürgen Förster and Günter Grundmann found the new mineral; Hans-Jürgen Förster conducted the electron-microprobe analyses; Luca Bindi performed the X-ray structural investigations; Chris J. Stanley and Günter Grundmann determined the optical and physical properties; Hans-Jürgen Förster wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grundmann, G.; Lehrberger, G.; Schnorrer-Köhler, G. The El Dragόn mine, Potosí, Bolivia. Mineral. Rec. 1990, 21, 133–146. [Google Scholar]
  2. Paar, W.H.; Cooper, M.A.; Moёlo, Y.; Stanley, C.J.; Putz, H.; Topa, D.; Roberts, A.C.; Stirling, J.; Raith, J.G.; Rowe, R. Eldragόnite, Cu6BiSe4(Se)2, a new mineral species from the El Dragόn mine, Potosí, Bolivia, and its crystal structure. Can. Mineral. 2012, 50, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mills, S.J.; Kampf, A.R.; Christy, A.G.; Housley, R.M.; Thorne, B.; Chen, Y.S.; Steele, I.M. Favreauite, a new selenite mineral from the El Dragόn mine, Bolivia. Eur. J. Mineral. 2014, 26, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Förster, H.-J.; Bindi, L.; Stanley, C.J. Grundmannite, CuBiSe2, the Se-analogue of emplectite: A new mineral from the El Dragόn mine, Potosí, Bolivia. Eur. J. Mineral. 2016, 28, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Förster, H.-J.; Bindi, L.; Stanley, C.J.; Grundmann, G. Hansblockite, (Cu,Hg)(Bi,Pb)Se2, the monoclinic polymorph of grundmannite, a new mineral from the Se mineralization at El Dragón (Bolivia). Mineral. Mag. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kampf, A.R.; Mills, S.J.; Nash, B.P.; Thorne, B.; Favreau, G. Alfredopetrovicite: A new selenite mineral from the El Dragόn mine, Bolivia. Eur. J. Mineral. 2016, 28, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bindi, L.; Förster, H.-J.; Grundmann, G.; Keutsch, F.N.; Stanley, C.J. Petřičekite, CuSe2, a new member of the marcasite group from the Předbořice deposit, Central Bohemia Region, Czech Republic. Minerals 2016, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cunningham, C.A.; Aparicio, H.N.; Murillo, F.S.; Jiménez, N.C.; Lizeca, J.-L.B.; McKee, E.H.; Ericksen, G.E.; Tavera, F.V. The Relationship between the Porco, Bolivia, Ag−Zn−Pb−Sn Deposit, and the Porco Caldera; US Geological Survey Open-File Report, Series Number 94-238; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1993.
  9. El Dragón Mine, Antonio Quijarro Province, Potosí Department, Bolivia. Available online: http://www.mindat.org/loc-353.html (accessed on 17 November 2016).
  10. Grundmann, G.; Förster, H.-J. Origin of the El Dragón selenium mineralization, Quijarro Province, Potosí, Bolivia. Minerals. in preparation.
  11. Armstrong, J.T. CITZAF: A package of correction programs for the quantitative electron microbeam X-ray-analysis of thick polished materials, thin films, and particles. Microbeam Anal. 1995, 4, 177–200. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oxford Diffraction. CrysAlis RED (Version 1.171.31.2) and ABSPACK in CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction Ltd.: Oxfordshire, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ibers, J.A.; Hamilton, W.C. (Eds.) International Tables for X-Ray Crystallography; Kynock: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974; Volume IV, p. 366.
  15. Edenharter, A.; Nowacki, W.; Takéuchi, Y. Verfeinerung der Kristallstruktur von Bournonit [(SbS3)2|CuIV2PbVIIPbVIII] und von Seligmannit [(AsS3)2|CuIV2PbVIIPbVIII]. Z. Krist. 1970, 131, 397–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moëlo, Y.; Makovicky, E.; Mozgova, N.N.; Jambor, J.L.; Cook, N.; Pring, A.; Paar, W.H.; Nickel, E.H.; Graeser, S.; Karup-Møller, S.; et al. Sulfosalt systematics: A review. Report of the sulfosalt sub-committee of the IMA Commission on Ore Mineralogy. Eur. J. Mineral. 2008, 20, 7–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bindi, L.; Keutsch, F.N.; Francis, C.A.; Menchetti, S. Fettelite, [Ag6As2S7][Ag10HgAs2S8] from Chañarcillo, Chile: Crystal structure, pseudosymmetry, twinning, and revised chemical formula. Am. Mineral. 2009, 94, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Orlandi, P.; Meerschaut, A.; Moëlo, Y.; Palvadeau, P.; Léone, P. Lead-antimony sulfosalts from Tuscany (Italy). VIII. Rouxelite, Cu2HgPb22Sb28S64(O,S)2, a new sulfosalt from Buca della Vena mine, Apuan Alps: Definition and crystal structure. Can. Mineral. 2005, 43, 919–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Breese, N.E.; O’Keeffe, M. Bond-valence parameters for solids. Acta Crystallogr. 1991, B47, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dymkov, Y.M.; Ryzhov, B.I.; Zav’yalov, Y.N.; Tsvetkova, M.V.; Shcherbachev, D.K. Bismuth variety of petrovicite from dolomitic veins of the Erzgebirge. Trans. Dokl. USSR Acad. Sci. Earth Sci. Sect. 1990, 306, 1451–1455. [Google Scholar]
  21. Simon, G.; Kesler, S.E.; Essene, E.J. Phase relations among selenides, sulphides, tellurides, and oxides: II. Applications to selenide-bearing ore deposits. Econ. Geol. 1997, 92, 468–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Back-scattered electron (BSE) image showing quijarroite (qu, dark grey) subparallel to and intergrown with hansblockite (hb, light grey) and associated with clausthalite (cl, bright).
Figure 1. Back-scattered electron (BSE) image showing quijarroite (qu, dark grey) subparallel to and intergrown with hansblockite (hb, light grey) and associated with clausthalite (cl, bright).
Minerals 06 00123 g001
Figure 2. BSE image showing acicular grains of quijarroite (qu) in the matrix and intergrown with watkinsonite (wa) and clausthalite (cl), and associated with grundmannite (gr).
Figure 2. BSE image showing acicular grains of quijarroite (qu) in the matrix and intergrown with watkinsonite (wa) and clausthalite (cl), and associated with grundmannite (gr).
Minerals 06 00123 g002
Figure 3. Reflected light digital images of quijarroite (qu) in association with hansblockite (hb), clausthalite (cl), krut’aite-penroseite (k-p), klockmannite (kl), umangite (u), and eldragόnite (eld). Horizontal field of view is 200 µm. Left images: one polarizer; right images: Partly crossed polarizers.
Figure 3. Reflected light digital images of quijarroite (qu) in association with hansblockite (hb), clausthalite (cl), krut’aite-penroseite (k-p), klockmannite (kl), umangite (u), and eldragόnite (eld). Horizontal field of view is 200 µm. Left images: one polarizer; right images: Partly crossed polarizers.
Minerals 06 00123 g003
Figure 4. The crystal structure of quijarroite (a) compared to that of bournonite (b) [14], both drawn down [001]. In quijarroite, dark blue spheres indicate the linearly coordinated Cu/Hg atoms, whereas light blue tetrahedra refer to the partially occupied Cu position (Cu0.750.25). Light, dark green and red spheres refer to Bi, Pb and Se, respectively. In bournonite, light blue tetrahedra refer to Cu, whereas green, red and yellow spheres refer to Pb, As and S, respectively.
Figure 4. The crystal structure of quijarroite (a) compared to that of bournonite (b) [14], both drawn down [001]. In quijarroite, dark blue spheres indicate the linearly coordinated Cu/Hg atoms, whereas light blue tetrahedra refer to the partially occupied Cu position (Cu0.750.25). Light, dark green and red spheres refer to Bi, Pb and Se, respectively. In bournonite, light blue tetrahedra refer to Cu, whereas green, red and yellow spheres refer to Pb, As and S, respectively.
Minerals 06 00123 g004
Figure 5. (Cu + Ag)−Hg−Bi (% apfu) ternary diagram showing the mean compositions of minerals of the Cu−Hg−Pb−Bi−Se system from El Dragón. Note the correspondence of quijarroite with phase “A” and hansblockite with phase “B” within analytical error. Data sources: [4,5], this paper and [2], for phases “A” and “B”.
Figure 5. (Cu + Ag)−Hg−Bi (% apfu) ternary diagram showing the mean compositions of minerals of the Cu−Hg−Pb−Bi−Se system from El Dragón. Note the correspondence of quijarroite with phase “A” and hansblockite with phase “B” within analytical error. Data sources: [4,5], this paper and [2], for phases “A” and “B”.
Minerals 06 00123 g005
Table 1. Reflectance data for quijarroite.
Table 1. Reflectance data for quijarroite.
λ (nm)R1 (%)R2 (%)λ (nm)R1 (%)R2 (%)
40045.145.656047.3048.4
42045.345.858047.248.5
44045.746.160047.048.6
46046.446.662046.848.7
48046.947.064046.648.7
50047.347.566046.548.7
52047.747.868046.448.7
54047.448.170046.348.8
Table 2. Chemical data for quijarroite.
Table 2. Chemical data for quijarroite.
ElementMeanRangeSD
Cu (wt %)13.3412.50–13.860.28
Ag1.020.42–1.760.28
Hg7.677.31–8.160.22
Pb16.8716.55–17.110.13
Co0.030.00–0.110.04
Ni0.150.00–0.450.15
Bi27.6527.37–28.050.19
Se33.5233.19–34.000.20
Total100.2499.64–100.650.30
Note: SD = 1σ standard deviation.
Table 3. Representative results of electron-microprobe spot analyses of quijarroite.
Table 3. Representative results of electron-microprobe spot analyses of quijarroite.
Elementd.l. (ppm)123456
Cu (wt %)25013.7913.3312.8813.4212.5013.36
Ag2000.421.051.570.711.761.09
Hg11007.567.967.407.317.758.16
Pb40016.8616.9016.7616.9316.7616.79
Co20000.110.06000
Ni2000.040.110.090.450.140
Bi30027.4927.4627.8027.4627.5127.69
Se80033.8633.3933.1933.3633.6033.49
Total 100.02100.3099.7699.64100.03100.57
Cu (apfu) 6.025.845.695.885.515.85
Ag 0.110.270.410.180.460.28
Hg 1.041.101.041.021.081.13
Pb 2.262.272.272.282.272.25
Co 0.050.03
Ni 0.020.050.040.210.07
Bi 3.653.663.733.663.693.69
Se 11.9011.7611.7911.7711.9211.80
Note: d.l. = detection limit.
Table 4. Measured and calculated X-ray powder diffraction data (d in Å) for quijarroite. The strongest diffraction lines are given in bold.
Table 4. Measured and calculated X-ray powder diffraction data (d in Å) for quijarroite. The strongest diffraction lines are given in bold.
hkldmeasImeasdcalcIcalc
010--9.020647
1016.65206.665123
1115.36555.360650
0024.82204.810918
020--4.510312
012--4.24505
210--4.11256
120--4.05335
2113.785603.781658
2023.331403.332545
0223.291903.290495
2203.228253.227629
2123.1251003.1260100
122--3.09985
2213.059253.060030
030--3.00698
1132.871152.872316
031--2.87007
130--2.85935
222--2.68039
0322.551102.549812
213--2.529110
230--2.520211
014--2.324311
4002.312502.310346
0402.256102.255213
2322.233102.232515
033--2.193611
313--2.15726
024--2.12259
2142.078352.076440
241--1.983115
2331.981301.981629
332--1.96427
2241.926101.928712
4221.888301.890835
2421.865201.867722
050--1.80416
215--1.74309
234--1.74017
432--1.71216
414--1.63857
440--1.61388
433--1.59086
252--1.58656
424--1.56306
612--1.44797
614--1.28396
264--1.22906
Note: Calculated diffraction pattern obtained with the atom coordinates reported in Table 6 (only reflections with Irel ≥ 5 are listed).
Table 5. Crystal data and details of data collection and refinement for quijarroite.
Table 5. Crystal data and details of data collection and refinement for quijarroite.
Crystal Data
space groupPmn21
cell parametersa = 9.2413(8) (Å)
b = 9.0206(7) (Å)
c = 9.6219(8) (Å)
V = 802.1(1) (Å3)
Z1
crystal colorblack
crystal shapeblock
crystal size (mm3)0.030 × 0.035 × 0.050
Data Collection
diffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur III
radiation type Mo (λ = 0.71073 Å)
monochromatororiented graphite (002)
scan modeϕ/ω
temperature (K)293
detector to sample distance (cm)5
number of frames702
rotation width per frame (°)0.15
measuring time (s)100
maximum covered 2θ (°)60.02
range of h, k, l−13 ≤ h ≤ 13, −12 ≤ k ≤ 12, −13 ≤ l ≤ 13
collected reflections9312
Rint before absorption correction0.0840
Rint after absorption correction0.0235
Refinement
refinement coefficientF2
No. of refl. in refinement2195
No. of observed refl.1523
No. of refined parameters69
weighting schemew = 1/[σ2(I) + (0.044 × I)2]
R (obs)/R (all)0.0276/0.0281
wR2 (obs)/wR2 (all)0.0242/0.0258
Flack parameter−0.002(9)
diff. Fourier (e3)[−0.42, 0.76]
Note: R = Σ||Fo| − |Fc||/|Fo|. wR2 = [Σ w (|Fo|2 − |Fc|2)2/Σ w (|Fo|4)]1/2.
Table 6. Wyckoff positions, site occupation factors (s.o.f.), fractional atomic coordinates (x,y,z), and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Uiso, Å2) for the selected quijarroite crystal.
Table 6. Wyckoff positions, site occupation factors (s.o.f.), fractional atomic coordinates (x,y,z), and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Uiso, Å2) for the selected quijarroite crystal.
AtomWyckoffs.o.f.xyzUiso
Cu14bCu0.75(1)Hg0.250.2311(3)0.2658(4)0.8228(4)0.0381(11)
Pb2aPb1.00½0.4971(3)0.1768(2)0.0424(6)
Bi12aBi1.00½0.0703(2)0.0560(3)0.0410(5)
Bi22aBi1.0000.5064(2)0.1495(2)0.0369(5)
Cu24bCu0.75(2)0.250.2437(6)0.2757(9)0.4230(11)0.0430(2)
Se12aSe1.0000.2400(6)0.2794(6)0.0342(11)
Se22aSe1.00½0.2319(6)0.2990(6)0.0340(11)
Se34bSe1.000.2373(4)0.0861(5)0.6428(5)0.0362(8)
Se44bSe1.000.2685(4)0.5532(5)0.4925(5)0.0374(8)
Table 7. Main interatomic distances (Å) for the studied quijarroite crystal.
Table 7. Main interatomic distances (Å) for the studied quijarroite crystal.
Cu1-Se4 i2.309(6)Bi2-Se4 vi2.673(4)
Cu1-Se32.373(6)Bi2-Se4 ii2.673(4)
Cu1-Pb i3.333(4)Bi2-Se12.708(6)
Pb-Se22.665(6)Cu2-Se42.601(9)
Pb-Se4 ii3.083(4)Cu2-Se12.662(7)
Pb-Se4 iii3.083(4)Cu2-Se22.681(7)
Pb-Cu iii3.333(4)Cu2-Se32.72(1)
Bi1-Se3 iv2.738(4)
Bi1-Se3 v2.738(4)
Bi1-Se22.755(6)
Note: Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1/2, −y + 1, z + 1/2; (ii) −x + 1/2, −y + 1, z − 1/2; (iii) x + 1/2, −y + 1, z − 1/2; (iv) −x + 1/2, −y, z − 1/2; (v) x + 1/2, −y, z − 1/2; (vi) x − 1/2, −y + 1, z − 1/2.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Förster, H.-J.; Bindi, L.; Grundmann, G.; Stanley, C.J. Quijarroite, Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12, a New Selenide from the El Dragόn Mine, Bolivia. Minerals 2016, 6, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6040123

AMA Style

Förster H-J, Bindi L, Grundmann G, Stanley CJ. Quijarroite, Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12, a New Selenide from the El Dragόn Mine, Bolivia. Minerals. 2016; 6(4):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6040123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Förster, Hans-Jürgen, Luca Bindi, Günter Grundmann, and Chris J. Stanley. 2016. "Quijarroite, Cu6HgPb2Bi4Se12, a New Selenide from the El Dragόn Mine, Bolivia" Minerals 6, no. 4: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6040123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop