Next Article in Journal
Effect of Pretreatment on Leaching Primary Copper Sulfide in Acid-Chloride Media
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Force Microscopy Study on the Interactions of COOH Functional Groups with Kaolinite Surfaces: Implications for Enhanced Oil Recovery
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/min7120251
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

LA-ICP-MS U-Th-Pb Dating and Trace Element Geochemistry of Allanite: Implications on the Different Skarn Metallogenesis between the Giant Beiya Au and Machangqing Cu-Mo-(Au) Deposits in Yunnan, SW China

by
Yu Fu
1,2,
Xiaoming Sun
1,2,3,*,
Dengfeng Li
1,2,
Hai Lin
2,3 and
Chunkit Lai
4,5
1
School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, Guangzhou 510275, China
3
School of Earth Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
4
Faculty of Science, University of Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
5
ARC Centre for Excellence in Ore Deposits (CODES), University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2017, 7(12), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120251
Submission received: 30 October 2017 / Revised: 13 December 2017 / Accepted: 15 December 2017 / Published: 19 December 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The giant Beiya Au skarn deposit and Machangqing porphyry Cu-Mo-(Au) deposit are located in the middle part of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan alkaline porphyry metallogenic belt. The Beiya deposit is the largest Au skarn deposit in China, whilst the Machangqing deposit comprises a well-developed porphyry-skarn-epithermal Cu-Mo-(Au) mineral system. In this paper, we present new allanite U-Th-Pb ages and trace element geochemical data from the two deposits and discuss their respective skarn metallogenesis. Based on the mineral assemblage, texture and Th/U ratio, the allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits are likely hydrothermal rather than magmatic. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) allanite U-Th-Pb dating has yielded Th-Pb isochron ages of 33.4 ± 4.6 Ma (MSWD = 0.22) (Beiya) and 35.4 ± 9.8 Ma (MSWD = 0.26) (Machangqing), representing the retrograde alteration and magnetite skarn mineralization age of the two deposits. The Beiya and Machangqing alkali porphyry-related mineralization are synchronous and genetically linked to the magmatic hydrothermal activities of the Himalayan orogenic event. Major and trace element compositions reveal that the Beiya allanite has higher Fe3+/(Fe3+ + Fe2+) ratios, U content and Th content than the Machangqing allanite, which indicate a higher oxygen fugacity and F content for the ore-forming fluids at Beiya. Such differences in the ore-forming fluids may have contributed to the different metallogenic scales and metal types in the Beiya and Machangqing deposit.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Allanite ((Ca,REE,Th)2(Fe,Al)3Si3O12(OH)) is a rare earth element (REE)-rich epidote-group mineral, and is commonly found in many magmatic/metamorphic rocks and hydrothermal mineral systems, especially in skarn and IOCG (iron-oxide copper gold). Allanite typically contains high U, Th and REE concentrations, which can be used for age dating and tracing various magmatic, metamorphic and ore-forming processes [1]. Allanite is a highly resistate mineral and has high closure temperature, rendering it a useful age dating material [2]. Allanite could crystallize in a wider range of metamorphic P-T conditions than zircon and monazite [3], and its common larger size enables the preservation of internal chemical and isotopic zoning [4]. Allanite has been increasingly used to date metamorphic events [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Compared to igneous and metamorphic petrogenetic research, in-situ laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) allanite dating and trace element analyses have not been widely used to investigate hydrothermal metallogenesis. In recent years, there are attempts to directly constrain skarn mineralization age using allanite U-Th-Pb dating [11,12], and to use allanite as tracer of the multiple hydrothermal fluid phases [13]. Although allanite commonly contains higher initial common Pb than zircon (which makes it harder to yield a concordant age) [4,14], allanite U-Th-Pb can still yield geological meaningful ages given that appropriate common Pb correction methods are adopted [4,14,15,16,17,18].
The giant Beiya Au-polymetallic skarn deposit is situated in the middle part of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan alkaline porphyry metallogenic belt. The deposit is the largest Au skarn deposit in China, with estimated ore reserves of 130.8 million tonnes (Mt) Au @ 2.47 g/t, 170 Mt Fe @ 33.3 wt %, 125 Mt Cu @ 0.52 wt %, along with considerable amounts of Pb, Zn and Ag [19,20]. The Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan alkaline porphyry metallogenic belt is an important Cu-Au province in SW China, and contains a large number of deposits that are spacetime associated with the Cenozoic (Himalayan) alkaline magmatism [21,22,23,24]. Ore deposit geology, ore fluid composition and metallogenic studies of the Beiya Au mineralization all suggest that the Beiya deposit resembles typical porphyry-related Au skarn deposits worldwide [25,26,27,28,29].
The Machangqing porphyry Cu-Mo-(Au) deposit near Beiya is also located in the middle part of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan metallogenic belt, and the mineral system also contains porphyry-related skarn and epithermal Cu-(Au) mineralization [23,30,31,32]. The two deposits likely share common post-collisional metallogenic settings and alkali porphyry-related mineralization style, but they differ greatly in terms of the ore deposit size and types of metals. Previous age dating studies have focused on the Machangqing intrusive complex and the molybdenite of the porphyry mineralization [23,32,33,34,35,36], whereas age constraints on the skarn mineralization are lacking.
Direct and precise dating of the skarn mineralization is pivotal to reveal the hydrothermal ore-forming processes of the Beiya and Machangqing deposits, to establish any genetic link with the regional alkaline magmatism, and to correlate the skarn mineralization in various parts of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan metallogenic belt [37]. In this study, we present new U-Th-Pb age and trace element data on the hydrothermal allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits. Our new data are integrated with published data to discuss the ore-forming environment and magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of these two porphyry-related mineral systems.

2. Geological Background

2.1. Regional Geology

The Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan alkali porphyry metallogenic belt is located in the Sanjiang Tethyan domain in SW China (Figure 1) [21,38], and is bounded by the South China Block to the east along the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan suture zone [39,40]. Many large porphyry and skarn deposits are associated with this belt, which makes it one of the most important metallogenic belts in China. The Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan alkali porphyry metallogenic belt includes two subbelts: the Yulong porphyry subbelt in the north and the Ailaoshan-Red River porphyry subbelt in the south [28].
The Beiya and Machangqing deposits are located in the eastern side of the Jinshajiang suture (Figure 1). Major igneous rocks emplaced in/around the Beiya ore district include the Late Permian Emeishan continental flood basalt and the Cenozoic alkaline porphyries. The Emeishan flood basalt is exposed in the southeastern part of the mining area. The regionally-widespread Cenozoic alkaline porphyries include those of (quartz) syenite, biotite-K-feldspar and quartz-albite [26,28,43,44,45], yet they are rarely exposed in the Beiya mining district. Major exposed rocks in the Beiya deposit include the Lower Triassic Qingtianbao Formation (175–350 m thick), the Middle Triassic Beiya Formation and Quaternary sedimentary rocks (Figure 2). The Lower Triassic Qingtianbao Formation comprises arkose, hornfelsed greywacke, sandstone and basaltic volcaniclastic rocks, whereas the main ore-bearing Middle Triassic Beiya Formation comprises dolomitic, ferruginous, bioclastic and argillaceous limestone (ca. 138–531 m thick). The Beiya Formation is deposited in a NS-trending basin upon which a broad NS-trending syncline is developed [28].
Outcropping rocks in the Machangqing deposit include the Lower Ordovician Xiangyang Formation (O1x), dolomitic limestone of the Lower Devonian Kanglang Formation (D1k) and limestone of the Lower Devonian Qingshan Formation (D1q) (Figure 3). The Xiangyang Formation comprises littoral-facies clastic rocks and contains four members, among which the third (O1x3) and fourth (O1x4) member are exposed in the ore field. O1x3 comprises grayish-green fine-grained sandstone with dark-gray shale in the upper part, and white fine-grained quartz sandstone with minor shale in the lower part. Unit O1x4 comprises quartz siltstone with limestone bands/lenses (main ore host) in the upper part, and coarse-grained feldspar-quartz sandstone with conglomerate, gravel-bearing gritstone and argillaceous siltstone lenses in the lower part. Permian basalts are also exposed in the northern part of the Machangqing deposit (Figure 3). During the Cenozoic Himalayan orogeny, multiple intrusions were emplaced in the area from 55.5 to 23.2 Ma [32]. These intrusive rocks are mainly composed of alkaline intrusions including syenite porphyry, quartz syenite porphyry, monzonite porphyry, granite porphyry, porphyritic granite and lamprophyre [30,35,36]. Among these porphyries, the alkaline granite porphyry (37.9–35.0 Ma) is considered to be ore-related [34,35,47,48]. The Machangqing intrusive complex was emplaced in the Xiangyang Formation at the onset of the mineralization.
Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan suture is generally interpreted to comprise three stages: (1) India–Asia continent-continent collision started at ca. 55–50 Ma [49,50]; (2) northward indentation of the Indian plate caused the transition from “soft” to “hard” collision at 45 Ma, as evidenced by a reduction in the convergence rate (e.g., [51]); and (3) the collisional strain was accommodated by the lateral extrusion (i.e., escape tectonics) of the Indochina–Simao Block from ca. 32 Ma onward, and the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan suture was reactivated as a regional strike-slip fault [52]. The Beiya and the Machangqing deposits were products of this Himalayan collisional tectonic event.

2.2. Ore Deposit Geology

2.2.1. Beiya

The Beiya Au-polymetallic deposit (~90 km north of Dali) is the largest gold skarn deposit in China. The deposit is located in the middle part of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan alkaline porphyry metallogenic belt [53] (Figure 1) and contains six ore segments, namely the Weiganpo, Bijiashan and Guogaishan segments in the east and the Wandongshan, Hongnitang and Jingouba segments in the west (Figure 2a). The Wandongshan (mainly the KT52 ore body) ranks the biggest, containing most of the Au resources (99 Mt @ 2.61 g/t Au [25]) and is currently being mined for gold and iron.
The orebodies in the Beiya deposit mostly occur in and/or along the contact zones between the intrusions and the carbonate host rocks of the Beiya Formation. Some stratiform orebodies are locally distributed along the flat interlayer fractures and breccia zones within the Beiya Formation carbonates, as well as at the contact of the carbonates and the underlying Qingtianbao Formation sandstone. Vein-like orebodies occur within the porphyritic intrusions, and laterite-hosted orebodies have also been documented [54]. Based on previous studies, the mineralization style in the Beiya deposit can be divided into porphyry, skarn and supergene styles [55]. Of these, skarn is the major mineralization type at Beiya deposit, with orebodies mostly found along the intrusive contact between porphyries and the Beiya Formation carbonates. Orebody KT52 (around the Wandongshan porphyry) is the largest skarn orebody (Figure 2b), with proven reserves of 87.2 Mt Au @ 2.35 g/t, along with 90.27 Mt Fe @ 34 wt %, and 111.8 Mt Cu @ 0.34 wt % [54].
The dominant skarn mineralization comprises three stages: (1) prograde skarn; (2) retrograde alteration; and (3) quartz-sulfide stages. Minerals in the prograde skarn stage are mainly anhydrous, such as garnet and pyroxene (Figure 4a), whereas retrograde alteration minerals are predominantly hydrous (Figure 4b,c), including epidote, allanite, biotite and chlorite. Magnetite, titanite, scheelite, feldspar (including plagioclase and albite) and fluorite can also be found in the retrograde alteration stage. The quartz-sulfide stage (Figure 4d) is characterized by pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite and molybdenite. Both the late retrograde alteration (quartz-magnetite) and quartz-sulfide stages are associated with the gold mineralization. The supergene orebodies with gold-bearing hematite and limonite are found along the unconformity between the Beiya Formation and the overlying Quaternary sediments. The porphyries emplaced in the Beiya deposit include those of quartz syenite, quartz monzonite, biotite orthoclase and quartz albite. Lamprophyre dikes are also documented in the area. Most of the porphyries were emplaced at around 36.9 to 33.3 Ma [24,25,26,28,56,57,58,59,60], except for the quartz albite porphyry (65 Ma) and the biotite orthoclase porphyry (3.8 Ma) [45]. The quartz syenite porphyry in the Beiya deposit has been LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dated to be 36.07 ± 0.43 Ma [24], and the retrograde-stage hydrothermal titanite yielded a weighted average 206Pb/238U age of 33.1 ± 1.0 Ma [61]. Molybdenite from the Beiya Au skarn has yielded a Re-Os isochron age of 34.7 ± 1.6 Ma, which constrains the age of the quartz-sulfide stage mineralization [24].
In the Beiya deposit, gold mainly occurs as native gold and electrum in fractures and/or as vein-filling in pyrite, magnetite, limonite and quartz. In the retrograde alteration and quartz-sulfide stages, the gold is also hosted by magnetite and sulfides (pyrite, chalcopyrite and bismuthinite), respectively. Compositions of the Beiya skarn minerals suggest a typical oxidized skarn system [28]. Fluid inclusion studies indicate medium to high temperatures (186–372 °C) and high salinities (7.5–19.8 wt % NaCl equiv.) for the ore-forming fluids, which were likely originated from the magma with late-stage meteoric water involvement [62]. The δ34S values of the quartz-sulfide stage range from −2.4‰ to 4.5‰, suggesting that the ore-forming fluids were derived from and/or modified by the magma [54,62,63]. The δ18O and δD compositions of the ore-forming fluids in the quartz-sulfide stage are −0.85‰ to 3.52‰ and −78.6‰ to −88.6‰, respectively [62]. The isotope evidence suggests that the Beiya ore-forming materials were derived from deep-sourced magmas [54,62].

2.2.2. Machangqing

The Machangqing deposit is a porphyry Cu-Mo deposit with skarn and epithermal Cu, Mo, Fe, Au and Pb-Zn mineralization. The ore reserve is estimated to contain 39 Mt Cu at 0.64% and 56 Mt Mo at 0.08% [23]. The mineralized zone comprises five NE-trending ore segments, namely Shuangmacao, Baoxingchang, Luandongshan, Rentouqing and Jinchangqing.
The mineralization of the Machangqing deposit includes porphyry Cu-Mo mineralization (the Baoxingchang and Luandongshan ore segments), skarn Cu-Mo-Fe mineralization along the intrusive contacts (the Baoxingchang and Luandongshan ore segments) and epithermal Au-Pb-Zn mineralization in the Xiangyang and Kanglang formations (the Shuangmacao, Rentouqing and Jinchangqing ore segments [30,32]). These three mineralization styles form a complete alkalic porphyry-related mineral system, and show a systematic alteration and mineralization style transition from the intrusion to the wall rocks [30,32]. In the Machangqing deposit, the porphyry ores usually occur as Cu-Mo veinlets within the intrusion associated with potassic, phyllic and argillic alterations [23]. The skarn mineralization mainly comprises three major stages: (1) prograde skarn; (2) retrograde alteration; and (3) a quartz-sulfide mineralization. Prograde skarn minerals are mainly anhydrous (e.g., garnet and pyroxene) (Figure 4e), whereas the retrograde alteration minerals are mainly hydrous (e.g., epidote-group minerals, biotite and chlorite) (Figure 4f). Magnetite mineralization mainly occurred during the late retrograde alteration (quartz-magnetite) stage, whilst the quartz-sulfide stage contains mainly pyrite, chalcopyrite and molybdenite (Figure 4g,h), and constitutes the main Cu-Mo mineralization stage. Previous studies have shown that the ore-forming temperature, pressure and salinities of the ore-forming fluids decreased from the porphyry, through skarn and to the epithermal mineralization [32,64]. The metal and fluid sources also changed from dominantly magmatic to hydrothermal [32]. The molybdenite Re-Os ages of the porphyry mineralization range from 33.9 ± 1.1 Ma to 35.8 ± 1.6 Ma [23,33,34,35,65].

3. Samples and Analytical Methods

Allanite samples for the in-situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating and trace element analysis were collected from the mineralized skarn (exoskarn) in the Beiya deposit (Wandongshan ore segment) and Machangqing deposit (Baoxingchang ore segment). The allanite samples from the Beiya deposit occur in a mineral assemblage of garnet, pyroxene, magnetite, epidote, feldspar and quartz, with minor titanite and scheelite, whereas those from the Machangqing deposit occur in a mineral assemblage of pyroxene, magnetite, feldspar, quartz, chalcopyrite and calcite, with minor titanite and scheelite. Petrographic thin sections were prepared for all the samples, and were studied with optical microscopy and Back-Scattered Electron (BSE) imaging, using a Zeiss SIGMA field-emission Scanning Electron Microprobe (SEM) (Oberkochen, Germany) at the School of Earth Science and Geological Engineering of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Prior to the LA-ICP-MS analysis, major element abundance of the allanite samples was determined on thin sections using a JEOL JXA-8230 electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA) (Tokyo, Japan) at the Key Laboratory of Mineralogy and Metallogeny in the Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GIGCAS). Operating conditions include 15 kV accelerating voltage, 20 nA beam current and a beam diameter of 2 μm.
In-situ U-Pb dating and trace element analyses of allanite were performed by LA-ICP-MS at the Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University. The analyses were performed using a 193 nm ArF excimer laser ablation system (GeoLasPro) coupled with an Agilent 7700x ICP-MS (Santa Clara, CA, USA). A 32 µm spot size was used with an energy density of 5 J/cm2 and a repetition rate of 5 Hz. The trace element compositions of allanite were calibrated against the Standard NIST610 [66], using Si determined by EPMA as the internal standard. Zircon 91500 [67] was used as the external standard for the U-Pb dating. A sample-standard bracketing method was used for instrumental drift correction. Each analysis consists of a 20 s background measurement (laser-off) followed by 45 s of data acquisition. Data reduction was performed using ICPMSDataCal software [68]. Time-dependent drifts of U-Th-Pb isotopic ratios were corrected using a liner interpolation (with time) for every five analyses based on the variations of 91500 zircon standard, and the detailed procedure can be found in literature [68]. ISOPLOT 3.0 software [69] was used to construct the Tera-Wasserburg diagram and isochrons.
Allanite commonly have large initial common Pb contents. Therefore, attention should be paid in correcting Pb isotopic data, and the choice of initial Pb isotopic composition would significantly influence the calculated ages [4]. We adopted the 207Pb correction method, which has been widely used to determine the age of relatively young allanite [4,70]. The 204Pb correction is less precise, because the counting error on 204Pb is larger than on the more abundant 207Pb. 204Pb is also more susceptible to measurement error due to isobaric interference. The uncorrected data are plotted on the Tera-Wasserburg diagram, and a regression through these analyses yields a lower intercept that represents the apparent allanite age. The y-intercept represents the initial 207Pb/206Pb, which can be used for the 207Pb-correction. The amount of common 206Pb is expressed as a fraction of the total 206Pb (f206), which can be calculated from:
f 206 = P 206 b c P 206 b m = P 207 b / P 206 b m − P 207 b / P 206 b * P 207 b / P 206 b c − P 207 b / P 206 b *
where 207Pb/206Pbm is the measured ratio, 207Pb/206Pb* is the expected radiogenic ratio for the inferred age and 207Pb/206Pbc is the common Pb composition (the initial 207Pb/206Pb).
For the Th-Pb system, isochrons can be constructed from multiple analyses of allanite samples which could be constructed with common 206Pb (206Pbc) as the reference stale isotope:
T 232 h m / P 206 b c = T 232 h / P 206 b m f 206
P 208 b m / P 206 b c = P 208 b / P 206 b m f 206
where 232Th/206Pbm and 208Pb/206Pbm are the measured ratios. The isochrons can be constructed as below:
P 208 b m / P 206 b c = P 208 b / P 206 b c + T 232 h m / P 206 b c × ( e λ 232 t − 1 )
where 208Pb/206Pbc is the initial common Pb composition, which can be determined from the intercept of the isochron. The age of allanite can be calculated from the slope of the isochron. This approach has been shown to be effective for correcting common-Pb in allanite.
The allanite in the Beiya and Machangqing mineralized skarn comprise euhedral to subhedral crystals (Figure 5a–f). Allanite grains in the Beiya deposit are typically 50–300 μm in length (Figure 5a,c,d) and exhibit obvious pleochroism under the microscope. They associate with skarn minerals such as garnet, pyroxene, magnetite, titanite, fluorite, feldspar and quartz, and mostly occur in the core of altered garnet (Figure 5c). Allanite from the Machangqing mineralized skarn is similar with the Beiya deposit, most of which is 50–400 μm in length and occurs with magnetite, chlorite, chalcopyrite, calcite and quartz (Figure 5b,e,f). All the allanite grains from both the Beiya and Machangqing deposits are often closely intergrown with magnetite (Figure 5a,b), and some fractures in the magnetite are filled with sulfides (Figure 4d). This indicates that the allanite was syn-magnetite mineralized, followed by sulfide mineralization. No obvious patchy zoning or overgrowth texture was observed in the allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits under BSE imaging, suggesting a single growth phase (Figure 5c–f).

4. Results

4.1. Major and Trace Elements of Allanite

The major element compositions of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite are summarized in Table A1, and the chemical formula of allanite was calculated based on the total cation number as 8 (12.5 O basis). Fe3+ is calculated using the equation (Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+) = ((REE3+ + Th4+)/(Al3+ − 3)) + 1 [71]. Allanite in the Beiya and Machangqing skarn have uniform SiO2 (30.6–32.9 wt % and 30.2–32.8 wt %, respectively) and high FeO contents (average 21.5 wt % and 21.0 wt %, respectively). All the Beiya and Machangqing allanite samples contain very high concentrations of light rare earth element (LREE), with the average La2O3 content of 8.35 and 7.25 wt %, and the average Ce2O3 content of 8.16 and 9.61 wt %, respectively. The Beiya allanite contains higher ThO (average: 0.41 wt %) and Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+) (average: 0.66 wt %) than the Machangqing allanite (average: 0.09 wt % and 0.63 wt %, respectively). The strongly positive (REE + Fe2+ + Mg) vs. (Ca + Al + Fe3+) correlation (Figure 6) indicates that a substitution mechanism of REE3+ + (Fe2+, Mg2+) − Ca2+ + (Al3+, Fe3+) operated in allanite [13].
Trace element geochemical analysis (Table A2) show that the Beiya allanite is significantly more U-rich (78–591 ppm, average: 172 ppm) than the Machangqing allanite (23–145 ppm, average: 78 ppm) (Figure 7a), and that the Th/U ratios of the Beiya allanite (average: 26.1) are also higher than its Machangqing counterpart (average: 12.9) (Figure 7b). Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite are shown in Figure 8. The Beiya and Machangqing allanite displays similar REE patterns with elevated total REE (ΣREE) contents (average ΣREE: 170,963 ppm and 149,772 ppm, respectively). They are characterized by significant LREE enrichment (LREE/HREE: 170–437 (Beiya) and 236–1439 (Machangqing)) and negative Eu anomalies (δEu: 0.24–0.40 (Beiya) and 0.30–0.57 (Machangqing)). Comparatively, the Beiya allanite has higher ΣREE content, but lower δEu and LREE/HREE ratio than the Machangqing allanite (Figure 7b,c).

4.2. Allanite U-Th-Pb Ages

The corrected U-Pb isotope results of allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits are presented in Table A3. In the Tera-Wasserburg diagram, the common Pb-uncorrected data of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite define a linear array, giving a lower-intercept age of 42.1 ± 4.7 Ma (MSWD = 4.2) and 35.4 ± 5.5 Ma (MSWD = 2.3), respectively. The Y-intercept of initial 207Pb/206Pb is 0.864 and 0.826, respectively (Figure 9). The Th-Pb isochrons of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite samples are shown in Figure 10, giving the 208Pb/206Pbc results of 2.760 and 1.946, with the Th-Pb isochron ages of 33.4 ± 4.6 Ma (MSWD = 0.22) and 35.4 ± 9.8 Ma (MSWD = 0.26), respectively.

5. Discussion

5.1. Reliability of Allanite U-Th-Pb Dating

Previous studies [4,14,16,73] show that precise allanite U-Th-Pb dating is influenced by several factors: (1) high and variable common Pb content; (2) excess 206Pb from 230Th decay in high-Th samples; and (3) lack of suitable matrix-matched allanite standards due to the large compositional variations caused by the solid solution with epidote.
Both the U-Pb and Th-Pb systems can be used to date allanite, although, in many cases, the latter is preferable due to its high Th content [14]. The correction for incorporation of 230Th during the mineral’s growth is often necessary for young allanite, because the excess 206Pb from the 230Th decay in Th-rich minerals can affect the 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ages of the young samples [4,14,18]. Excess 206Pb results in older apparent concordia intercept ages and lower 207Pb/206Pb values for the common Pb component in the y-intercept. The elevated intercept age reflects the variable 206Pb excess (Figure 9). Therefore, we use the Th-Pb system and choose the Th-Pb isochron ages as the real age of the allanite samples. Compared to the Beiya allanite, the Machangqing allanite yielded an intercept age closer to the Th-Pb isochron age because of its lower Th content (Figure 9 and Figure 10). In addition, the larger analytical uncertainty of Th-Pb isochron ages for the Machangqing allanite may have resulted from the lower Th and 208Pb contents than the Beiya allanite (Table A2).
Some studies suggest that LA-ICP-MS analysis is less sensitive to matrix effect than ion-microprobe analysis [4]. In many cases, using an allanite standard for the external calibration of U-Th-Pb ages may not be imperative due to the compositional difference between the samples and the reference materials. Completely matrix matched materials are rare because allanite has a much greater range of elemental substitution than many other minerals used for U-Th-Pb dating (e.g., monazite), and even the most widely-used allanite reference materials (e.g., AVC and Tara) have large variations in common-Pb content [4]. Many previous studies have shown that accurate and precise allanite U-Th-Pb ages can be obtained by using non-matrix matched external standards, such as zircons (91500 and GJ-1) [11,12,14,17] and synthetic glass (NIST610) [18]. Therefore, the non-matrix matched external standardization approach with the use of zircon standard 91500 in this study is likely to be reliable.

5.2. Age of Skarn Mineralization in the Beiya and Machangqing Deposits

Different origins of allanite can be discriminated by their paragenetic mineral assemblages and geochemistry [9]. In general, hydrothermal allanite contains lower Th/U (mostly < 50) than magmatic allanite (mostly > 50) due to the higher mobility of U in hydrothermal fluids than Th [74]. Both the Beiya and Machangqing allanite yielded relatively low Th/U ratios (average: 25.5 and 12.9, respectively), which rules out a magmatic origin. Besides, the allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits commonly coexists with skarn minerals (e.g., magnetite, garnet, feldspar and pyroxene), suggesting a hydrothermal origin.
Paragenetic evidence indicates that the Beiya and Machangqing allanite were formed during the retrograde alteration stage before the quartz-sulfide stage, which implies that the hydrothermal allanite ages at Beiya and Machangqing were broadly coeval with the magnetite mineralization but slightly older than the sulfide mineralization. Thus, the U-Th-Pb ages of the hydrothermal allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits provide an upper age limit of mineralization at 33.4 ± 4.6 Ma and 35.4 ± 9.8 Ma, respectively.
Previous studies suggested that the Beiya ore-related porphyry were formed at 36.1 ± 0.4 Ma [24], and that the titanite U-Pb age and the molybdenite Re-Os age have altogether constrained the Beiya Au skarn mineralization to ca. 33.1–34.1 Ma [61]. In this study, the skarn mineralization is determined to be largely coeval with the Au mineralization, and slightly younger than the porphyry emplacement. Meanwhile, the ore-related granite porphyries in the Machangqing deposit were zircon U-Pb dated to be ca. 35.0–37.9 Ma [34,35,47,48], and the porphyry mineralization was molybdenite Re-Os dated to be ca. 33.9–35.8 Ma [23,33,34,35,65], which are broadly coeval with the skarn mineralization (determined by allanite U-Th-Pb dating in this study). The similar ages between the porphyry and skarn mineralization in the Machangqing deposit suggest that they were likely formed in the same metallogenic system, and that the alkaline granite porphyry had likely supplied the ore-forming materials, fluids and heat that drove the mineralization. As a whole, the skarn mineralization in the Beiya and Machangqing deposits are synchronous and temporally related to the magmatic hydrothermal activity in the Himalayan orogenic event. Besides, the marked similarity between our new Beiya allanite U-Th-Pb age (33.4 ± 4.6 Ma) and the published Beiya titanite U-Pb age (33.1 ± 1.0 Ma) [61] suggests that our U-Th-Pb dating and data reduction approach are reliable.

5.3. Metallogenic Implications

The U contents of allanite can be used to evaluate the oxygen fugacity (fO2) of the ore-forming fluids [12,13]. Uranyl (U6+) complexes are strongly soluble in hydrothermal fluids [13], and therefore highly U contents may indicate more oxidized fluids [12]. The Beiya allanite has higher U contents (average: 171 ppm) than the Machangqing allanite (average: 78 ppm) (Figure 7a), suggesting that the ore-forming fluids in the Beiya deposit may have been more oxidized. This conclusion is also supported by the higher Fe3+/(Fe3+ + Fe2+) ratios of the Beiya allanite (Figure 11). The allanite in the Beiya deposit is co-precipitated with magnetite during the retrograde stage, which predate the gold discharge at quartz sulfide stage [75], and the oxygen fugacity revealed by allanite should represent for the quartz-magnetite stage that recharging and/or migration the gold-bearing fluid. Similarly, the mineral assemblage of allanite and magnetite in the Machangqing deposit predated the precipitation of copper during the sulfide stage. The oxygen fugacity of allanite from the Machangqing deposit could provide constrain for the oxidization state of Cu-bearing fluid in the quartz-magnetite (retrograde) stage.
Previous studies show that in chloride-rich hydrothermal fluids, Th is much less soluble than U, yet both U and Th are highly soluble in F-rich fluids [11,76]. Thus, enrichments of F− ligands in the hydrothermal fluids would cause high-Th allanite precipitation [11,13,77]. The hydrothermal allanite from the Machangqing deposit contains much lower Th content (average: 914 ppm) than that from the Beiya deposit (average: 3630 ppm), suggesting higher F activities in the Beiya ore-forming fluids. This conclusion is consistent with the presence of fluorite in the Beiya Au skarn ores (Figure 5c). In summary, our new allanite geochemical data indicate a higher F content and oxygen fugacity for the ore-forming fluids in the Beiya deposit than those in the Machangqing deposit.
Although the giant Beiya Au deposit and Machangqing Cu-Mo deposit are both located in the middle part of the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan metallogenic belt (about 100 km apart), they differ greatly in terms of the ore deposit size and types of metals. The higher oxygen fugacity in the Beiya magmatic fluids had likely prevented early sulfide precipitation and the consequent metal removal, as well as increased the metal solubility in the hydrothermal fluids [78]. As a result, the Beiya ore-forming fluids could carry more metals than its Machangqing counterparts, leading to a larger deposit size of the former. Besides, gold can be effectively transported as gold (III) fluoride in high-temperature hydrothermal fluids [79], and the higher F− content in the Beiya hydrothermal fluids (cf. the Machangqing ones) may lead to the Au-dominated mineralization in the Beiya deposit (and the sub-economic gold mineralization in the Machangqing deposit).

6. Conclusions

(1)
Allanite U-Th-Pb geochronology can be obtained by using Th-Pb isochron age and the non-matrix matched external standardization approach.
(2)
Allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing Au skarn yielded a Th-Pb isochron ages of 33.4 ± 4.6 Ma (MSWD = 0.22) and 35.4 ± 9.8 Ma (MSWD = 0.26), respectively, representing the ages of the retrograde alteration.
(3)
Major and trace element characteristics of the allanite from the two deposits suggest that the ore-forming fluids in the Beiya deposit may have had higher F content and oxygen fugacity than those in the Machangqing deposit.

Acknowledgments

This work was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41602067, U1302233, and 41702067), Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M582457), National Key Basic Research Program (2015CB452604), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030313246), Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2011), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (17lgpy63). We thank Changming Xing for helping with the EPMA analysis, and Wenchang Li for the fieldwork and sampling support. The academic editor David Chew and two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their constructive comments.

Author Contributions

Yu Fu and Xiaoming Sun conceived and designed the experiments; Yu Fu performed the experiments; Dengfeng Li and Hai Lin analyzed the data; Yu Fu wrote the paper, assisted by all other authors; and Lai Chunkit and Dengfeng Li contributed to the revising of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Electron microprobe analysis results (wt %) of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite.
Table A1. Electron microprobe analysis results (wt %) of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite.
Beiya
PointW364-1-01W364-1-02W364-1-03W364-1-04W364-1-05W364-1-06W364-1-07W364-1-08W364-1-09W364-1-10W364-1-11W364-2-01W364-2-02W364-2-03W364-2-04W364-2-05W364-2-06W364-2-07W364-2-08W364-2-09W364-2-10
MgO0.300.320.330.410.330.310.340.330.330.300.350.310.300.330.330.340.300.330.370.370.34
Al2O38.109.7211.1410.329.5512.599.0910.089.119.159.8510.319.1112.9513.339.239.8310.357.319.6813.33
SiO230.5931.3231.8231.1931.5132.7330.9731.8431.0230.7431.3531.9631.6432.8932.7931.8931.4231.4930.9431.2332.58
CaO12.0612.8213.6912.7713.4015.0512.7313.8312.5912.1613.1113.8113.2815.7815.6113.3213.3813.4812.4413.1615.92
TiO20.650.620.590.620.830.740.550.590.570.650.580.720.580.890.790.990.790.700.790.800.55
MnO0.290.270.250.270.310.270.260.220.250.270.250.260.220.240.230.250.250.230.280.270.24
FeOT24.1522.5320.6920.7922.3719.2322.4921.9222.6622.2721.8121.6123.1219.2118.1921.8522.1621.3124.2121.5018.41
La2O39.488.608.608.478.407.778.888.069.099.519.098.098.956.236.768.528.988.288.938.586.06
Ce2O39.608.467.988.307.457.088.717.838.839.308.698.258.546.757.417.718.458.069.018.196.83
Pr2O30.460.470.460.420.450.420.450.470.470.550.510.440.450.500.490.470.490.500.450.480.43
Nd2O30.910.950.900.871.000.880.910.940.971.241.080.910.891.020.970.951.001.000.910.900.83
ThO20.370.540.270.281.430.100.530.680.720.420.260.280.420.320.380.300.240.370.080.250.37
F0.180.120.380.350.180.110.160.110.100.190.140.410.080.010.100.010.110.090.220.140.21
Total96.5996.0896.4694.4295.5997.0795.3996.1195.8896.1496.6796.6697.0696.7896.8995.5297.0595.7295.6395.1695.51
Formula Calculation Based on 8 Cations and 12.5 Oxygens
Mg0.040.050.050.060.050.040.050.050.050.040.050.040.040.040.040.050.040.050.050.050.05
Al0.931.091.221.161.071.361.031.121.041.041.111.131.021.391.431.041.101.160.841.101.43
Si2.962.992.962.992.983.002.993.002.992.982.982.973.002.992.993.062.983.003.013.002.97
Ca1.251.311.371.311.361.481.321.401.301.261.341.381.351.541.521.371.361.371.301.361.55
Ti0.050.040.040.040.060.050.040.040.040.050.040.050.040.060.050.070.060.050.060.060.04
Mn0.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.02
Fe2+0.690.620.560.580.580.490.630.560.650.680.630.550.620.450.470.560.610.580.630.590.43
Fe3+1.261.181.051.081.190.981.191.161.181.121.111.131.221.020.921.191.141.111.341.140.97
La0.340.300.300.300.290.260.320.280.320.340.320.280.310.210.230.300.310.290.320.300.20
Ce0.340.300.270.290.260.240.310.270.310.330.300.280.300.230.250.270.290.280.320.290.23
Pr0.020.020.020.010.020.010.020.020.020.020.020.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.01
Nd0.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.03
Th0.010.010.010.010.030.000.010.010.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.000.010.01
F0.050.040.110.110.050.030.050.030.030.060.040.120.020.000.030.000.030.030.070.040.06
Total8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00
Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+)0.650.650.650.650.670.670.650.670.640.620.640.670.660.700.660.680.650.660.680.660.69
Machangqing
PointsJDS03-01A-01JDS03-01A-02JDS03-01A-03JDS03-01A-04JDS03-01A-05JDS03-01A-06JDS03-01A-07JDS03-01A-08JDS03-01B-01JDS03-01B-02JDS03-01B-03JDS03-01B-04JDS03-01B-05JDS03-01B-06JDS03-01B-07JDS03-01B-08
MgO0.650.640.690.440.650.600.450.890.810.900.810.890.820.800.810.84
Al2O311.1013.0012.4510.118.7812.0310.228.818.0310.3712.278.738.839.958.4210.08
SiO231.6032.8131.5531.1330.1531.3431.2230.3230.4831.5232.4830.6030.9931.2030.5431.16
CaO13.1615.2813.1412.9112.0313.3512.9311.7111.7613.2815.2411.9712.4013.1311.3112.67
TiO20.680.600.610.550.600.290.730.630.790.960.630.800.900.690.620.46
MnO0.160.140.150.170.210.140.250.170.200.250.210.230.240.290.200.30
FeOT20.3419.2018.6921.5123.0419.4321.7221.1623.4319.5018.6723.0823.5622.1320.2119.92
La2O37.596.188.159.597.617.487.477.486.835.655.726.206.046.409.588.09
Ce2O310.097.6210.029.979.9110.2010.2310.2410.529.047.769.6910.119.419.948.99
Pr2O30.610.610.620.560.740.560.750.640.750.730.740.740.740.700.880.71
Nd2O31.401.381.391.291.901.232.121.612.362.302.202.202.001.982.881.87
ThO20.160.180.030.430.110.150.100.020.010.010.000.130.050.100.000.05
F0.380.000.160.110.130.050.120.280.150.100.000.140.140.130.120.20
Total97.3897.4597.4598.2295.6296.6498.0893.6795.9694.5096.7395.1296.6396.6895.3995.09
Formula Calculation Based on 8 Cations and 12.5 Oxygens
Mg0.090.090.100.060.090.080.060.130.120.130.110.130.120.110.120.12
Al1.221.391.371.131.011.341.141.020.921.171.331.000.991.110.991.15
Si2.942.992.952.952.942.962.952.992.973.033.002.972.962.953.053.01
Ca1.311.491.321.311.261.351.311.241.231.371.511.241.271.331.211.31
Ti0.050.040.040.040.040.020.050.050.060.070.040.060.060.050.050.03
Mn0.010.010.010.010.020.010.020.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.02
Fe2+0.600.480.620.690.680.630.660.640.670.530.480.630.620.590.710.60
Fe3+0.980.980.841.021.200.911.061.111.241.030.961.241.261.160.971.00
La0.260.210.280.340.270.260.260.270.250.200.190.220.210.220.350.29
Ce0.340.250.340.350.350.350.350.370.380.320.260.340.350.330.360.32
Pr0.020.020.020.020.030.020.030.020.030.030.020.030.030.020.030.02
Nd0.050.040.050.040.070.040.070.060.080.080.070.080.070.070.100.06
Th0.000.000.000.010.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
F0.110.000.050.030.040.020.040.090.050.030.000.040.040.040.040.06
Total8.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.00
Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+)0.620.670.570.600.640.590.620.630.650.660.670.660.670.660.580.63

Appendix B

Table
Table A2. Trace element analysis result (ppm) of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS).
Table A2. Trace element analysis result (ppm) of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS).
PointYLaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHoErTmYbLuPbThUΣREE 1LREE/HREE 2δEu 3
Beiya
W364-1-1-111288,19078,2504031793243439.838722.426.12.325.550.602.870.5858.85584 106 179,3243990.29
W364-1-1-219787,03276,9613962767446742.839425.140.24.369.710.954.860.9830.32065 112 176,6193670.30
W364-1-1-324690,74481,0624239851054549.342928.349.15.0111.61.135.591.1834.23694 121 185,6803490.30
W364-1-1-47085,04777,3693975778336535.636820.017.51.673.300.251.990.2854.05638 77.7 174,9884230.29
W364-1-1-537871,32164,0753312662041741.632923.050.96.7822.32.7315.63.3643.04264 109 146,2413210.33
W364-1-2-16086,72874,1313860793738932.043223.419.61.874.300.322.400.5418.91283 140 173,5623570.24
W364-1-2-215290,60875,8673829781843040.644927.334.43.768.900.805.280.7830.52697 210 179,1213370.28
W364-1-2-3112591,27774,0723876857969678.952148.214924.278.311.177.416.054.63922 591 179,5041930.38
W364-1-2-488893,50172,1013602752155956.547641.512919.764.69.1359.012.665.57621 514 178,1512190.33
W364-1-2-527490,34079,3743991804146143.446530.349.65.7014.41.548.691.7157.86262 100 182,8273160.28
W364-1-2-615386,13477,1744050827639438.443325.831.63.528.400.704.760.7946.96182 160 176,5753460.28
W364-1-3-18891,42880,5024061808445643.639022.024.82.034.220.411.940.2776.65855 101 185,0204140.31
W364-1-3-218485,55674,5943827775952449.937824.036.73.998.051.055.620.9760.55744 174 172,7683760.33
W364-1-3-334261,45053,6712748564436339.028019.946.67.2421.02.8216.93.6041.83123 139 124,3133110.36
W364-1-3-430776,80367,7003595747251049.836124.853.56.3216.41.829.871.8625.6868 117 156,6063280.34
W364-1-4-131583,41174,4543915777452248.040327.451.26.3016.92.1811.02.3569.03938 131 170,6413270.31
W364-1-4-223984,10576,7704035815355651.041026.943.84.9411.81.216.891.3854.43564 126 174,1763420.31
W364-1-4-323982,49374,0523814759347645.439125.143.45.0912.41.467.291.6249.74091 147 168,9603460.31
W364-1-5-130993,55281,0054310932954553.746931.557.67.0018.12.3014.72.6539.64224 156 189,3983130.32
W364-1-5-234484,81773,7593885830349850.642329.657.97.4321.22.5715.42.8940.23189 144 171,8723060.33
W364-1-5-4141770,75563,3043435774156666.240943.017231.310313.375.211.785.52842 220 146,7241700.40
W364-1-6-144991,26377,9003998831752357.143731.968.69.4027.23.1119.84.0338.72678 273 182,6603030.36
W364-1-6-274494,88084,790466010,63381575.253045.512617.851.16.2737.06.7534.63772 137 196,6732390.33
W364-1-6-325093,43382,5594389923648544.844128.147.75.8015.71.8411.02.2439.64871 142 190,7013430.29
W364-1-7-139275,67368,7663703776453551.437326.657.67.6221.42.4412.52.7032.62251 165 156,9973100.33
W364-1-7-220473,15065,7673477710048249.234123.040.14.6011.01.016.541.3039.31615 178 150,4553500.35
W364-1-7-334775,71567,6303562749552552.835525.655.17.4221.62.4914.73.4049.24527 244 155,4663190.35
W364-1-7-632277,91869,5383710776853750.537526.056.36.2417.01.9911.12.0643.42484 171 160,0183220.33
W364-1-7-735581,57471,9703782790456560.538728.160.87.7321.22.4114.13.2943.93046 265 166,3803160.37
W364-2-1-111683,51071,7153833762150355.035014.833.73.766.840.734.560.8216.73941 126 167,6494030.38
W364-2-1-216188,20477,8544300872558951.641018.741.54.9710.41.147.171.2313.31901 112 180,2193630.30
W364-2-1-312572,79561,5682939645941343.329913.129.63.758.821.198.781.3013.32906 95.8 144,5833940.36
W364-2-2-222776,48069,9843913834461662.642122.760.27.2213.11.6010.61.9111.42288 221 159,9372960.36
W364-2-3-224089,91678,0044189831055260.040421.157.98.9020.32.9521.73.7816.94110 207 181,5713350.37
W364-2-4-124486,99376,4274184852760163.641821.657.18.4020.12.6918.73.2421.33706 166 177,3453220.37
W364-2-4-210687,60077,7184246855154753.536914.428.63.326.700.815.300.8416.94022 100 179,1454160.34
W364-2-7-147187,81674,1733883781655262.541526.492.316.242.45.7944.67.6611.51667 158 174,9532680.38
W364-2-7-210583,10171,5103651713541544.632013.729.63.658.061.065.951.0614.12994 162 166,2404330.36
W364-2-12-111692,49677,8343923824750751.235614.328.92.917.331.236.930.9722.15393 101 183,4784370.35
Machangqing
JDS03-01-0110762,09973,116521211,99650535.815410.727.63.497.190.853.780.3418.22107 142 153,1727350.30
JDS03-01-0216858,98474,123561914,01873082.621415.643.45.8511.41.214.480.6414.91255 145 153,8545170.49
JDS03-01-0315853,98467,027546914,30477490.820814.544.45.9511.31.146.840.8511.81072 54.4 141,9424840.52
JDS03-01-0498.559,85972,724520611,78451545.715210.427.43.446.880.692.880.3023.51027 114 150,3377370.38
JDS03-01-0512657,19471,090548313,86266878.616611.834.54.919.200.884.980.5313.91260 54.4 148,6086370.52
JDS03-01-0614163,20774,775531311,94356656.217813.638.55.489.910.904.130.4321.81183 118 156,1126210.42
JDS03-01-0713053,82566,743509212,86778999.321415.442.35.139.140.915.480.8211.51381 117 139,7084760.55
JDS03-01-0817960,33068,892477611,04362771.118715.446.86.6513.31.316.520.8011.91519 108 146,0165250.49
JDS03-01-0917254,72463,927461410,89861251.319115.045.95.9811.81.125.220.5014.51505 121 135,1034880.36
JDS03-01-1042.253,26364,195493211,75950849.11076.2113.21.693.040.232.170.3110.0582 30.1 134,84010050.44
JDS03-01-1125562,81679,496630616,284104011126923.470.29.4920.72.2011.31.428.24847 54.1 166,4604070.47
JDS03-01-1237.260,52868,162482710,52440342.81045.5713.61.372.700.270.960.177.87406 39.5 144,61411270.47
JDS03-01-1335.259,01372,146529711,86342941.796.14.7110.71.422.770.241.520.2728.7465 23.5 148,90912630.44
JDS03-01-1519258,30674,330587514,83388110622518.455.67.3613.91.448.010.9212.3714 54.5 154,6624670.53
JDS03-01-2141.861,77773,417504910,79139135.494.75.6212.71.682.890.231.500.187.55613 37.1 151,58012670.40
JDS03-01-2320658,67972,480570614,36479582.420317.154.47.5015.21.798.490.9912.4763 52.7 152,4154930.46
JDS03-01-2470.657,30268,367496711,58347047.21168.2622.02.595.980.523.030.4316.5606 49.4 142,8948990.45
JDS03-01-2541.662,29772,666514111,02932433.381.14.9512.61.493.310.351.300.197.68560 26.5 151,59714390.46
JDS03-01-2753260,07077,383640418,150144216642242.813819.840.74.4823.52.677.22906 89.1 164,3082360.50
JDS03-01-2845160,17378,770668219,085139312838737.712516.734.33.9516.72.246.36859 80.0 166,8542670.40
JDS03-01-2932759,45776,180619416,993112413030828.790.511.824.42.6213.01.646.96832 71.2 160,5603330.51
JDS03-01-3014860,32472,523531713,11163882.816513.039.65.2810.71.066.450.827.58739 72.9 152,2386280.57
JDS03-01-3130762,87774,996550114,07388510826224.280.311.223.42.5413.31.668.84825 86.9 158,8593780.53
JDS03-01-3224460,30473,398548713,75081493.822420.264.98.5317.31.837.641.018.33747 102 154,1934460.50
JDS03-01-3324859,24673,606569914,55487588.923221.168.59.3318.21.859.761.2414.3637 72.3 154,4314260.45
JDS03-01-3432142,69954,658446712,21987311224824.283.811.023.42.5814.31.578.03547 89.6 115,4372820.56
JDS03-01-3725156,20867,943536113,32883110923120.367.99.1518.41.838.971.229.04723 102 144,1404010.57
1 ΣREE means total rare earth element; 2 LREE (light rare earth element) = La + Ce + Pr + Nd + Sm + Eu; HREE (heavy rare earth element) = Gd + Tb + Dy + Ho + Er + Tm + Yb + Lu; 3 δEu = (Eu/Eu*)N = EuN/((1/2)SmN + (1/2)GdN).

Appendix C

Table
Table A3. LA-ICP-MS U-Th-Pb isotope data for allanite from the Beiy and Machangqing deposits.
Table A3. LA-ICP-MS U-Th-Pb isotope data for allanite from the Beiy and Machangqing deposits.
PointMeasured Value207Pb Correction
Th/U207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U208Pb/232Thf206232Thm/206Pbc208Pbm/206Pbc
Ratio1sigmaRatio1sigmaRatio1sigmaRatio1sigma
Beiya
W364-1-1-152.40.74310.02154.49700.19020.04390.00160.00320.00010.8517885.8
W364-1-1-218.40.67150.02432.61010.09240.02820.00080.00430.00010.7610524.6
W364-1-1-330.50.65630.03032.03780.08210.02250.00050.00290.00000.7523196.7
W364-1-1-472.50.75890.03075.21150.19070.04980.00150.00300.00000.8721296.4
W364-1-1-539.20.72620.02463.20160.09500.03200.00090.00310.00010.8318555.8
W364-1-2-19.20.61070.02921.49450.05560.01770.00050.00460.00010.699464.4
W364-1-2-212.80.54400.02321.27080.04630.01690.00040.00370.00010.6115575.7
W364-1-2-36.60.52770.01720.97800.03170.01340.00020.00430.00010.5910724.6
W364-1-2-414.80.47510.01850.88480.02870.01350.00030.00280.00010.5226877.6
W364-1-2-562.80.75540.02904.91570.21470.04720.00170.00300.00010.8719906.0
W364-1-2-638.60.64970.02951.75930.07960.01960.00060.00250.00010.7434668.8
W364-1-3-157.80.76110.02936.88400.31340.06560.00210.00370.00010.8712894.8
W364-1-3-233.00.71470.02952.71800.13560.02760.00090.00320.00010.8218666.0
W364-1-3-322.40.67770.03112.73940.11240.02930.00080.00400.00010.7712335.0
W364-1-3-47.40.66890.03692.49980.13440.02710.00110.00800.00030.764503.6
W364-1-4-130.00.74660.02785.26080.17280.05110.00120.00500.00010.868704.3
W364-1-4-228.30.76030.02414.50140.17030.04290.00130.00440.00010.879644.3
W364-1-4-327.80.63890.02382.86270.08600.03250.00070.00370.00010.7215085.5
W364-1-5-127.10.62800.03022.06040.08260.02380.00080.00300.00010.7120466.1
W364-1-5-222.20.68420.02842.68960.10980.02850.00090.00390.00010.7812985.0
W364-1-5-412.90.63900.02272.13520.08460.02420.00070.00460.00010.728663.9
W364-1-6-19.80.53250.02241.37920.05130.01880.00050.00440.00010.5911264.9
W364-1-6-227.60.62890.03001.99410.08020.02300.00070.00300.00010.7121816.6
W364-1-6-334.30.60410.02751.97780.08230.02370.00060.00270.00010.6827157.3
W364-1-7-113.70.65790.04052.02850.06130.02240.00070.00430.00010.7510334.4
W364-1-7-29.10.71180.02722.60380.10560.02650.00090.00690.00020.815283.6
W364-1-7-318.60.63930.03161.70070.06000.01930.00070.00330.00010.7316715.5
W364-1-7-614.50.69820.02902.58580.09630.02690.00060.00500.00010.808414.2
W364-1-7-711.50.58760.03231.49150.06420.01840.00050.00400.00010.6612034.9
W364-2-1-131.40.61370.04512.18710.11870.02580.00100.00280.00010.6921586.1
W364-2-1-217.00.67620.05212.48680.14180.02670.00120.00440.00020.779914.3
W364-2-1-330.30.62610.04852.38140.12330.02760.00110.00310.00010.7117785.5
W364-2-2-210.40.42960.04240.80750.04500.01360.00050.00310.00010.4717425.3
W364-2-3-219.90.55010.05131.31310.07860.01730.00070.00280.00010.6219325.4
W364-2-4-122.30.59330.03252.37910.12060.02910.00110.00370.00010.6711864.4
W364-2-4-240.10.63760.03892.70070.12910.03070.00120.00300.00010.7218685.6
W364-2-7-110.60.55510.04051.34320.07710.01760.00070.00440.00020.6210074.5
W364-2-7-218.40.58630.03721.47360.08150.01820.00060.00310.00010.6616225.1
W364-2-12-153.40.67250.04683.60730.19120.03890.00150.00290.00010.7719125.5
Machangqing
JDS03-01-0114.80.67940.04352.59780.17970.02770.00170.00490.00020.816373.1
JDS03-01-028.70.65170.04092.24120.11200.02490.00100.00630.00020.784292.7
JDS03-01-0319.70.73660.05174.96600.26150.04890.00240.00590.00020.894372.6
JDS03-01-049.00.73160.03004.88460.29340.04840.00230.01210.00060.882002.4
JDS03-01-0523.10.72420.03836.05290.30780.06060.00250.00630.00020.874302.7
JDS03-01-0610.00.73550.03554.53220.29600.04470.00250.00940.00040.882412.3
JDS03-01-0711.80.58900.03611.80970.11180.02230.00080.00470.00020.707313.5
JDS03-01-0814.10.64300.03432.25380.11190.02540.00090.00490.00020.776443.2
JDS03-01-0912.40.64510.03932.31890.16220.02610.00140.00540.00030.776043.3
JDS03-01-1019.40.79500.05137.80320.50840.07120.00390.01010.00060.962582.6
JDS03-01-1115.70.70140.08753.81730.25050.03950.00220.00550.00020.844752.6
JDS03-01-1210.30.75980.11265.32810.39430.05090.00340.01040.00050.922132.2
JDS03-01-1319.80.78510.034630.02471.78730.27740.01490.03000.00140.95702.1
JDS03-01-1513.10.76240.03445.43230.22860.05170.00170.00910.00030.922662.4
JDS03-01-2116.50.72430.06074.66930.25590.04680.00210.00630.00020.874022.6
JDS03-01-2314.50.80010.05295.90120.32530.05350.00290.00930.00060.972642.4
JDS03-01-2412.30.72080.03288.22590.51420.08280.00420.01390.00080.871662.3
JDS03-01-2521.20.73060.05486.89600.38770.06850.00370.00750.00030.883202.4
JDS03-01-2710.20.60550.07081.56330.07630.01870.00080.00450.00010.727343.3
JDS03-01-2810.70.61890.06101.58070.09330.01850.00080.00410.00010.737723.2
JDS03-01-2911.70.62540.06342.08870.12920.02420.00110.00450.00010.746412.9
JDS03-01-3010.10.70000.04722.37270.12000.02460.00090.00540.00020.844862.6
JDS03-01-319.50.67850.05652.28850.11200.02450.00080.00570.00020.814632.6
JDS03-01-327.40.63090.04351.78930.09180.02060.00080.00570.00020.754722.7
JDS03-01-338.80.74590.03665.05960.44800.04920.00380.01110.00090.901972.2
JDS03-01-346.10.65480.04562.22080.11140.02460.00100.00790.00030.783072.4
JDS03-01-377.10.65930.04662.13310.10320.02350.00090.00650.00020.793742.4

References

  1. Cox, R.A.; Wilton, D.H.C.; Kosler, J. Laser-ablation U-Th-Pb in situ dating of zircon and allanite: An example from the October Harbour granite, Central Coastal Labrador, Canada. Can. Mineral. 2003, 41, 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cenki-tok, B.; Oliot, E.; Rubatto, D.; Berger, A.; Engi, M.; Janots, E.; Thomsen, T.B.; Manzotti, P.; Regis, D.; Spandler, C.; et al. Preservation of Permian allanite within an Alpine eclogite facies shear zone at Mt Mucrone, Italy: Mechanical and chemical behavior of allanite during mylonitization. Lithos 2011, 125, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Janots, E.; Negro, F.; Brunet, F.; Goffé, B.; Engi, M.; Bouybaouène, M.L. Evolution of the REE mineralogy in HP-LT metapelites of the Sebtide complex, Rif, Morocco: Monazite stability and geochronology. Lithos 2006, 87, 214–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gregory, C.J.; Rubatto, D.; Allen, C.M.; Williams, I.S.; Hermann, J.; Ireland, T. Allanite micro-geochronology: A LA-ICP-MS and SHRIMP U-Th-Pb study. Chem. Geol. 2007, 245, 162–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, Y.; Cheong, C.-S.; Lee, Y.; Williams, I.S. SHRIMP allanite U-Th-Pb dating of bimodal Triassic metamorphism of Neoarchean tonalitic gneisses, Daeijak Island, central Korea. Geosci. J. 2009, 13, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jung, S.; Brandt, S.; Nebel, O.; Hellebrand, E.; Seth, B.; Jung, C. The P-T-t paths of high-grade gneisses, Kaoko Belt, Namibia: Constraints from mineral data, U-Pb allanite and monazite and Sm-Nd/Lu-Hf garnet ages and garnet ion probe data. Gondwana Res. 2014, 25, 775–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cliff, R.A.; Oberli, F.; Meier, M.; Droop, G.T.R.; Kelly, M. Syn-metamorphic folding in the Tauern Window, Austria dated by Th-Pb ages from individual allanite porphyroblasts. J. Metamorph. Geol. 2015, 33, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Janots, E.; Engi, M.; Rubatto, D.; Berger, A.; Gregory, C.; Rahn, M. Metamorphic rates in collisional orogeny from in situ allanite and monazite dating. Geology 2009, 37, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gregory, C.J.; Rubatto, D.; Hermann, J.; Berger, A.; Engi, M. Allanite behaviour during incipient melting in the southern Central Alps. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 84, 433–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rubatto, D.; Regis, D.; Hermann, J.; Boston, K.; Engi, M.; Beltrando, M.; Mcalpine, S.R.B. Yo-yo subduction recorded by accessory minerals in the Italian Western Alps. Nat. Geosci. 2011, 4, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deng, X.; Li, J.; Wen, G. Dating iron skarn mineralization using hydrothermal allanite-(La) U-Th-Pb isotopes by laser ablation ICP-MS. Chem. Geol. 2014, 382, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, T.W.; Zhou, M.-F. Ages and compositions of primary and secondary allanite from the Lala Fe-Cu deposit, SW China: Implications for multiple episodes of hydrothermal events. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2014, 168, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pal, D.C.; Chaudhuri, T.; McFarlane, C.; Mukherjee, A.; Sarangi, A.K. Mineral chemistry and in situ dating of allanite, and geochemistry of its host rocks in the Bagjata uranium mine, Singhbhum Shear Zone, India- Implications for the chemical evolution of REE mineralization and mobilization. Econ. Geol. 2011, 106, 1155–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Darling, J.R.; Storey, C.D.; Engi, M. Allanite U-Th-Pb geochronology by laser ablation ICPMS. Chem. Geol. 2012, 292, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Janots, E.; Rubatto, D. U-Th-Pb dating of collision in the external Alpine domains (Urseren zone, Switzerland) using low temperature allanite and monazite. Lithos 2014, 184, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Smye, A.J.; Roberts, N.M.W.; Condon, D.J.; Horstwood, M.S.A.; Parrish, R.R. Characterising the U-Th-Pb systematics of allanite by ID and LA-ICPMS: Implications for geochronology. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2014, 135, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, H.; Xiao, Y.; Xu, L.; Sun, H.; Huang, J.; Hou, Z. Origin of allanite in gneiss and granite in the Dabie orogenic belt, Central East China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2017, 135, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mcfarlane, C.R.M. Allanite U-Pb geochronology by 193 nm LA ICP-MS using NIST610 glass for external calibration. Chem. Geol. 2016, 438, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, Z.H.; Guan, D.R.; He, W.Y.; Zhou, Y.M.; Fu, D.G.; Yang, S.; Wang, L.; Li, W.H.; Su, G.S.; Yang, R. Exploration moldel of Beiya superlarge gold-polymetallic deposit, northwestern Yunnan. Miner. Depos. 2016, 35, 261–282. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Fu, D.; Liu, B. Metallogenic setting and ore genetic model for the Beiya porphyry-skarn polymetallic Au orefield, western Yunnan, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deng, J.; Wang, Q.; Li, G.; Santosh, M. Cenozoic tectono-magmatic and metallogenic processes in the Sanjiang region, southwestern China. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2014, 138, 268–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deng, X.D.; Li, J.W.; Zhou, M.F.; Zhao, X.F.; Yan, D.R. In-situ LA-ICPMS trace elements and U-Pb analysis of titanite from the Mesozoic Ruanjiawan W-Cu-Mo skarn deposit, Daye district, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 65, 990–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hou, Z.; Zeng, P.; Gao, Y.; Du, A.; Fu, D. Himalayan Cu-Mo-Au mineralization in the eastern Indo-Asian collision zone: Constraints from Re-Os dating of molybdenite. Miner. Depos. 2006, 41, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fu, Y.; Sun, X.; Lin, H.; Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Ouyang, X.; Jiang, L.; Shi, G.; Liang, Y. Geochronology of the giant Beiya gold-polymetallic deposit in Yunnan Province, Southwest China and its relationship with the petrogenesis of alkaline porphyry. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 71, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deng, J.; Wang, Q.; Li, G.; Hou, Z.; Jiang, C.; Danyushevsky, L. Geology and genesis of the giant Beiya porphyry-skarn gold deposit, northwestern Yangtze Block, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 70, 457–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, B.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Mao, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, H.; He, Z.; Su, G. Geochemistry and geochronology of porphyries from the Beiya gold-polymetallic orefield, western Yunnan, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 69, 360–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fu, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhou, H.; Lin, H.; Jiang, L.; Yang, T. In-situ LA-ICP-MS trace elements analysis of scheelites from the giant Beiya gold-polymetallic deposit in Yunnan Province, Southwest China and its metallogenic implications. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 80, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, W.; Mo, X.; He, Z.; White, N.C.; Chen, J.; Yang, K.; Wang, R.; Yu, X.; Dong, G.; Huang, F. The geology and mineralogy of the Beiya skarn gold deposit in Yunnan, Southwest China. Econ. Geol. 2015, 110, 1625–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Meinert, L.; Hedenquist, J.; Satoh, H.; Matsuhisa, Y. Formation of Anhydrous and Hydrous Skarn in Cu-Au Ore Deposits by Magmatic Fluids. Econ. Geol. 2003, 98, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, Y.; Kerrich, R.; Kemp, A.I.S.; McCuaig, T.C.; Hou, Z.; Hart, C.J.R.; Li, Z.; Cawood, P.A.; Bagas, L.; Yang, Z.; et al. Intracontinental eocene-oligocene porphyry Cu mineral systems of Yunnan, Western Yangtze Craton, China: Compositional characteristics, sources, and implications for continental collision metallogeny. Econ. Geol. 2013, 108, 1541–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, R.; Burnard, P.G.; Turner, G.; Bi, X. Helium and Argon isotope systematics in fluid inclusions of Machangqing copper deposit in west Yunnan Province, China. Chem. Geol. 1998, 146, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Z.; Ge, L.; Guo, X.; Wang, L.; Yuan, S.; Yang, L. Epithermal-porphyry Cu-Mo-Au ploymetal metallogenic system in Machangqing ore field, Yunnan. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2012, 28, 1425–1437. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xing, J.; Guo, X.; Qu, W.; Wang, Z.; Li, H. Molybdenite Re-Os age and other geological meaning of Machangqing porphyry copper, molybdenum deposit. Gold Sci. Technol. 2009, 17, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, F.; Lu, Q.; Li, C.; Xiao, J.; Wu, R.; Song, X.; Cai, Y.; Cai, F. Dating of ore-bearing porphyritic granite from the Machangqing Mo-Cu-Au deposit in Western Yunnan Province and its geologic significance. J. Jilin Univ. Earth Sci. Ed. 2013, 43, 1377–1392. [Google Scholar]
  35. He, W.; Mo, X.; Yu, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.; He, Z. Geochronological study of magmatic intrusions and mineralization of Machangqing porphyry Cu-Mo-Au deposit, Western Yunnan Province. Earth Sci. Front. 2011, 18, 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  36. Guo, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Yang, Y.; Che, X. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages of granite in Machangqing complex of Yunnan Province and their geological significance. Geol. China 2011, 38, 610–622. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  37. Chiaradia, M.; Schaltegger, U.; Spikings, R.; Wotzlaw, J.F.; Ovtcharova, M. How accurately can we date the duration of magmatic-hydrothermal events in porphyry systems—An Invited Paper. Econ. Geol. 2013, 108, 565–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hou, Z.; Zaw, K.; Pan, G.; Mo, X.; Xu, Q.; Hu, Y.; Li, X. Sanjiang Tethyan metallogenesis in S. W. China: Tectonic setting, metallogenic epochs and deposit types. Ore Geol. Rev. 2007, 31, 48–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lai, C.K.; Meffre, S.; Crawford, A.J.; Zaw, K.; Xue, C.D.; Halpin, J.A. The Western Ailaoshan Volcanic Belts and their SE Asia connection: A new tectonic model for the Eastern Indochina Block. Gondwana Res. 2014, 26, 52–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lai, C.K.; Meffre, S.; Crawford, A.J.; Zaw, K.; Halpin, J.A.; Xue, C.D.; Salam, A. The central ailaoshan ophiolite and modern analogs. Gondwana Res. 2014, 26, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Yin, A.; Harrison, T.M.; Grove, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, G. A tectonic model for Cenozoic igneous activities in the eastern Indo-Asian collision zone. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2001, 188, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hou, Z.; Zhong, D.; Deng, W. A tectonic model for porphyry copper-molybdenum-gold metallogenic belts on the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Geol. China 2004, 31, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  43. Najman, Y.; Appel, E.; Fadel, M.B.; Bown, P.; Carter, A.; Garzanti, E.; Godin, L.; Han, J.; Liebke, U.; Oliver, G.; et al. Timing of India-Asia collision: Geological, biostratigraphic, and palaeomagnetic constraints. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dupont-Nivet, G.; Lippert, P.C.; Van Hinsbergen, D.J.J.; Meijers, M.J.M.; Kapp, P. Palaeolatitude and age of the Indo–Asia collision: Palaeomagnetic constraints. Geophys. J. Int. 2010, 182, 1189–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chung, S.L.; Chu, M.F.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Xie, Y.W.; Lo, C.H.; Lee, T.Y.; Lan, C.Y.; Li, X.H.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.Z. Tibetan tectonic evolution inferred from spatial and temporal variations in post-collisional magmatism. Earth Sci. Rev. 2005, 68, 173–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hou, Z.; Cook, N.J. Metallogenesis of the Tibetan collisional orogen: A review and introduction to the special issue. Ore Geol. Rev. 2009, 36, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, X.; Cai, X.; Song, B.; Zhang, B.; Ying, H.; Xiao, Q.; Wang, J. Petrologic, chronological and geochemistry characteristics and formation mechanism of alkaline porphyries in the Beiya gold district, western Yunnan. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2006, 22, 631–642. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xue, C.; Hou, Z.; Liu, X.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hao, B. Petrogenesis and metallogenesis of the Beiya gold-polymetallic ore district, northwestern Yunnan province, China: Responses to the Indo-Asian collisional processes. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2008, 24, 457–472. [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu, X.; Cai, X.; Xiao, Q.; Peters, S.G. Porphyry Cu-Au and associated polymetallic Fe-Cu-Au deposits in the Beiya Area, western Yunnan Province, south China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2007, 31, 224–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guo, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, S. Machangqing porphyry Cu-Mo-Au deposit, Yunnan Province: Geological characteristics and its genesis. Acta Geol. Sin. 2009, 83, 1901–1914. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, L.; Bi, X.; Hu, R.; Zhang, X.; Su, W.; Qu, W.; Hu, Z.; Tang, Y. Relationships between porphyry Cu-Mo mineralization in the Jinshajiang-Red River metallogenic belt and tectonic activity: Constraints from zircon U-Pb and molybdenite Re-Os geochronology. Ore Geol. Rev. 2012, 48, 460–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liang, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Campbell, I. Constraints to the mineralization of the copper deposits from forming and evolution of potassium-rich alkali rock at Machangqing copper deposits. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2004, 14, 116–120. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mao, J.; Pirajno, F.; Lehmann, B.; Luo, M.; Berzina, A. Distribution of porphyry deposits in the Eurasian continent and their corresponding tectonic settings. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2014, 79, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, W.; Wang, J.; He, Z.; Dou, S. Formation of Au-polymetallic ore deposits in alkaline porphyries at Beiya, Yunnan, Southwest China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 73, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhou, H.; Sun, X.; Fu, Y.; Lin, H.; Jiang, L. Mineralogy and mineral chemistry of Bi-minerals: Constraints on ore genesis of the Beiya giant porphyry-skarn gold deposit, southwestern China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 79, 408–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lu, Y.; Kerrich, R.; Cawood, P.A.; McCuaig, T.C.; Hart, C.J.R.; Li, Z.; Hou, Z.; Bagas, L. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of potassic felsic intrusions in western Yunnan, SW China: Constraints on the relationship of magmatism to the Jinsha suture. Gondwana Res. 2012, 22, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, S. Metallogenic Modeling of the Beiya Gold Deposit in Western Yunnan and Its Relation to the Cenozoic Alkali-Rich Porphries; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  58. He, W.; Mo, X.; Yu, X.; He, Z.; Dong, G.; Liu, X.; Su, G.; Huang, X. Zircon U-Pb and molybdenite Re-Os dating for the Beiya gold-polymetallic deposit in the western Yunnan Province and its geological significance. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2013, 29, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar]
  59. Jiang, C.; Wang, Q.; Li, G.; Ma, N.; Hu, Z. Relative oxidation states of intrusions in Beiya gold-polymetallic deposit in Sanjiang area, Yunnan, SW China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2013, 29, 3925–3936. [Google Scholar]
  60. He, W.; Yu, X.; Mo, X.; He, Z.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Su, G. Genetic type and the relationship between alkali-rich intrusion and mineralization of Beiya gold-polymetallic ore field, western Yunnan Province, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2012, 28, 1401–1421. [Google Scholar]
  61. Fu, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhou, H.; Lin, H.; Yang, T. In-situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology and trace elements analysis of polygenetic titanite from the giant Beiya gold-polymetallic deposit in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 77, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. He, W.Y. The Beiya Giant Gold-Polymetallic Deposit: Magmatism and Metallogenic Model; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  63. Xiao, X.; Yu, X.; Mo, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, X. Geochemical characteristics of the metallogenesis in the gold-polymetallic desposit in Beiya, western Yunnan Province. Geol. Explor. 2011, 47, 170–179. [Google Scholar]
  64. Guo, X.; Niu, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Xia, R. Metallognic system of Machangqing Cu-Mo-Au polymetallic ore concentration area in Yunnan Province. Miner. Depos. 2012, 31, 615–628. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang, D.; Qu, W.; Li, Z.; Yin, H.; Chen, Y. Mineralization episode of porphyry copper deposits in the Jinshajiang-Red River mineralization belt: Re-Os dating. Sci. China Ser. D 2005, 48, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pearce, N.J.G.; Perkins, W.T.; Westgate, J.A.; Gorton, M.P.; Jackson, S.E.; Neal, C.R.; Chenery, S.P. A compilation of new and published major and trace element data for NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612 glass reference materials. Geostand. Newsl. 1997, 21, 115–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wiedenbeck, M.; AllÉ, P.; Corfu, F.; Griffin, W.L.; Meier, M.; Oberli, F.; Von Quadt, A.; Roddick, J.C.; Spiegel, W. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses. Geostand. Newsl. 1995, 19, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Y.; Gao, S.; Hu, Z.; Gao, C.; Zong, K.; Wang, D. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths. J. Petrol. 2010, 51, 537–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ludwig, K.R. User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.0: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel; Berkeley Geochronology Center: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  70. Williams, I. U-Th-Pb geochronology by ion microprobe. Rev. Econ. Geol. 1998, 7, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  71. Poitrasson, F. In situ investigations of allanite hydrothermal alteration: Examples from calc-alkaline and anorogenic granites of Corsica (southeast France). Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2002, 142, 485–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sun, S.S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. In Magmatism in the Ocean Basins; Snder, A.D., Norry, M.J., Eds.; Geological Society Special Publication: London, UK, 1989; Volume 42, pp. 313–345. [Google Scholar]
  73. Schärer, U. The effect of initial 230Th disequilibrium on young U-Pb ages: The Makalu case, Himalaya. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1984, 67, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Guo, H.; Xiao, Y.; Gu, X.; Huang, J.; Hou, Z.; Liu, H. LA-ICP-MS allanite U-Th-Pb geochronology study on Guangdong Xinfeng REE-rich granite. Acta Geol. Sin. 2014, 88, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhou, H.; Sun, X.; Cook, N.J.; Lin, H.; Fu, Y.; Zhong, R.; Brugger, J. Nano to micron-scale particulate gold hosted by Magnetite: A product of gold scavenging by bismuth melts. Econ. Geol. 2017, 112, 993–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Smith, M.A.P.; Henderson, P.A.U.L.; Jeffries, T.E. The formation and alteration of allanite in skarn from the Beinn a Dubhaich granite aureole, Skye. Eur. J. Mineral. 2002, 14, 471–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lancmuir, D.; Herman, J.S. The mobility of thorium in natural waters at low temperatures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1980, 44, 1753–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sun, W.; Huang, R.; Li, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Sun, S.; Zhang, L.; Ding, X.; Li, C.; Zartman, R.E.; et al. Porphyry deposits and oxidized magmas. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 65, 97–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Einstein, F.; Rao, P.R.; Trotter, J.; Bartlett, N. The crystal structure of gold trifluoride. J. Chem. Soc. A 1967, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 07 00251 g001 550
Figure 1. Tectonic map of the Beiya and Machangqing deposit. Modified after [41,42].
Figure 1. Tectonic map of the Beiya and Machangqing deposit. Modified after [41,42].
Minerals 07 00251 g001
Minerals 07 00251 g002 550
Figure 2. Geological map (a) and cross-section (b) of the Beiya deposit. Modified after [30,46].
Figure 2. Geological map (a) and cross-section (b) of the Beiya deposit. Modified after [30,46].
Minerals 07 00251 g002
Minerals 07 00251 g003 550
Figure 3. Geological map (a,b) and cross-section (c) of the Machangqing deposit. Modified after [30,45].
Figure 3. Geological map (a,b) and cross-section (c) of the Machangqing deposit. Modified after [30,45].
Minerals 07 00251 g003
Minerals 07 00251 g004 550
Figure 4. Photomicrographs of samples from different ore forming stages in: the Beiya deposit (a–d); and the Machangqing deposit (e–h) ((a,e) prograde skarn (garnet + pyroxene) mineral assemblage (cross-polarized light); (b,c,f) retrograde alteration (allanite + titanite + magnetite + biotite + quartz) mineral assemblage (plane-polarized light); and (d,g–h) quartz-sulfide mineralization (pyrite + chalcopyrite + magnetite + molybdenite) mineral assemblage (reflected light)). Abbreviations: Aln, allanite; Bt, biotite; Cpy, chalcopyrite; Ep, epidote; Grt, garnet; Mo, molybdenite; Mt, magnetite; Px, pyroxene; Py, pyrite; Qz, quartz; Ttn, titanite.
Figure 4. Photomicrographs of samples from different ore forming stages in: the Beiya deposit (a–d); and the Machangqing deposit (e–h) ((a,e) prograde skarn (garnet + pyroxene) mineral assemblage (cross-polarized light); (b,c,f) retrograde alteration (allanite + titanite + magnetite + biotite + quartz) mineral assemblage (plane-polarized light); and (d,g–h) quartz-sulfide mineralization (pyrite + chalcopyrite + magnetite + molybdenite) mineral assemblage (reflected light)). Abbreviations: Aln, allanite; Bt, biotite; Cpy, chalcopyrite; Ep, epidote; Grt, garnet; Mo, molybdenite; Mt, magnetite; Px, pyroxene; Py, pyrite; Qz, quartz; Ttn, titanite.
Minerals 07 00251 g004
Minerals 07 00251 g005 550
Figure 5. Photomicrographs and BSE images of the allanite from: the Beiya deposit (a,c,d); and the Machangqing deposit (b,e,f). Abbreviations: Aln, allanite; Cal, calcite; Chl-, chlorite; Cpy, chalcopyrite; Fl, fluorite; Grt, garnet; Mt, magnetite; Px, pyroxene; Py, pyrite; Qz, quartz; Ttn, titanite.
Figure 5. Photomicrographs and BSE images of the allanite from: the Beiya deposit (a,c,d); and the Machangqing deposit (b,e,f). Abbreviations: Aln, allanite; Cal, calcite; Chl-, chlorite; Cpy, chalcopyrite; Fl, fluorite; Grt, garnet; Mt, magnetite; Px, pyroxene; Py, pyrite; Qz, quartz; Ttn, titanite.
Minerals 07 00251 g005
Minerals 07 00251 g006 550
Figure 6. Major element plots of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite, showing negative (REE + Fe2+ + Mg) vs. (Ca + Al + Fe3+) correlation. The line defines the 1:1 substitution of REE3+ + (Fe2+, Mg2+) for Ca2+ + (Al3+, Fe3+) in allanite.
Figure 6. Major element plots of the Beiya and Machangqing allanite, showing negative (REE + Fe2+ + Mg) vs. (Ca + Al + Fe3+) correlation. The line defines the 1:1 substitution of REE3+ + (Fe2+, Mg2+) for Ca2+ + (Al3+, Fe3+) in allanite.
Minerals 07 00251 g006
Minerals 07 00251 g007 550
Figure 7. Plots of: (a) Th vs. U; (b) Th/U vs. LREE/HREE (light rare earth element divide heavy rare earth element); and (c) total REE (ΣREE) vs. δEu in the allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits.
Figure 7. Plots of: (a) Th vs. U; (b) Th/U vs. LREE/HREE (light rare earth element divide heavy rare earth element); and (c) total REE (ΣREE) vs. δEu in the allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits.
Minerals 07 00251 g007
Minerals 07 00251 g008 550
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of allanite from the (a) Beiya and (b) Machangqing deposits. Normalizing values are from [72].
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of allanite from the (a) Beiya and (b) Machangqing deposits. Normalizing values are from [72].
Minerals 07 00251 g008
Minerals 07 00251 g009 550
Figure 9. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) Tera-Wasserburg diagram: (a) the Beiya deposit; and (b) the Machangqing deposit.
Figure 9. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) Tera-Wasserburg diagram: (a) the Beiya deposit; and (b) the Machangqing deposit.
Minerals 07 00251 g009
Minerals 07 00251 g010 550
Figure 10. LA-ICP-MS Th-Pb isochrons of the allanite samples from: (a) the Beiya deposit; and (b) the Machangqing deposit.
Figure 10. LA-ICP-MS Th-Pb isochrons of the allanite samples from: (a) the Beiya deposit; and (b) the Machangqing deposit.
Minerals 07 00251 g010
Minerals 07 00251 g011 550
Figure 11. Fe3+/(Fe3+ + Fe2+) ratios of allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits.
Figure 11. Fe3+/(Fe3+ + Fe2+) ratios of allanite from the Beiya and Machangqing deposits.
Minerals 07 00251 g011

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, Y.; Sun, X.; Li, D.; Lin, H.; Lai, C. LA-ICP-MS U-Th-Pb Dating and Trace Element Geochemistry of Allanite: Implications on the Different Skarn Metallogenesis between the Giant Beiya Au and Machangqing Cu-Mo-(Au) Deposits in Yunnan, SW China. Minerals 2017, 7, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120251

AMA Style

Fu Y, Sun X, Li D, Lin H, Lai C. LA-ICP-MS U-Th-Pb Dating and Trace Element Geochemistry of Allanite: Implications on the Different Skarn Metallogenesis between the Giant Beiya Au and Machangqing Cu-Mo-(Au) Deposits in Yunnan, SW China. Minerals. 2017; 7(12):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Yu, Xiaoming Sun, Dengfeng Li, Hai Lin, and Chunkit Lai. 2017. "LA-ICP-MS U-Th-Pb Dating and Trace Element Geochemistry of Allanite: Implications on the Different Skarn Metallogenesis between the Giant Beiya Au and Machangqing Cu-Mo-(Au) Deposits in Yunnan, SW China" Minerals 7, no. 12: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120251

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop