Next Article in Journal
Aggregation Mechanism of Particles: Effect of Ca2+ and Polyacrylamide on Coagulation and Flocculation of Coal Slime Water Containing Illite
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Calcium Ions on the Flotation of Sillimanite Using Dodecylammonium Chloride
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application and Mechanism of Anionic Collector Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) in Phosphate Beneficiation

1
College of Resources and Environment Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
2
Hubei Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of High Efficient Cleaning Utilization for Shale Vanadium Resource, Wuhan 430081, China
3
Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for High Efficient Utilization of Vanadium Resources, Wuhan 430081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2017, 7(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/min7020029
Submission received: 22 January 2017 / Revised: 14 February 2017 / Accepted: 16 February 2017 / Published: 20 February 2017

Abstract

:
Phosphate ore is a valuable strategic resource. Most phosphate ore in China is collophane. Utilization of mid-low grade collophane is necessary to maintain social sustainable development. The gravity-flotation combination separation process can be utilized to separate mid-low grade collophane, but the process consumes a large quantity of acid in the reverse stage. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was used as a dolomite collector in this study to reduce the acid consumption of collophane flotation. SDS effectively removed dolomite from the gravity concentrate when no other reagents were present. Flotation test results showed that, compared to the conventional gravity-flotation process, the proposed SDS-based process reduced phosphoric acid dosage from 6.1 kg/t to 3.9 kg/t with similar separation results. The SDS action mechanisms on dolomite were further investigated by zeta potential analysis, single mineral flotation tests, infrared spectrum detection, and theoretical analysis. The results indicate that the SDS adsorption on dolomite is mainly physical adsorption, and that favorable separation effects between collophane and dolomite may be attributed to physical adsorption and entrainment. In addition, it also indicates that the physical adsorption can be utilized to remove dolomite from phosphate on account of zeta potential differences when the separate feed is coarse.

1. Introduction

Phosphate ore, a non-renewable resource, forms a critical component of the chemical fertilizer industry, and is one of most important strategic resources in China [1,2]. Its development and utilization directly relates to national food security. It is also an essential component in phosphorous-based chemicals [3,4,5]. China’s cumulative reserves of phosphorite comprise approximately twenty billion tons, mainly distributed across Hubei, Guizhou, Yunnan, Szechwan, and Hunan province [6,7].
China is one of the world’s largest producers and consumers of phosphate ore resources. Alongside the rapid development of the chemical fertilizer industry in China, phosphate ore consumption has grown tremendously and now threatens to exhaust the country’s rich phosphate ore resources [8,9]. To realize the sustainable development and utilization of phosphorite, the focus must shift from rich ore to mid-low grade phosphate ore [10]. Over 75% of the phosphate ore resources in China are mid-low grade collophane (implicit crystal, microscopic cryptocrystalline apatite) [11], thus, the reasonable utilization and economic exploitation of mid-low grade collophane is of great significance.
Mid-low grade collophane is difficult to utilize directly. It must be upgraded to meet subsequent processing requirements [12,13,14]. Chinese collophane is characterized by fine grain and close association with gangue minerals, making it particularly challenging to separate [15]. The gangue minerals can be roughly divided into two categories: silicate minerals and carbonate minerals [16,17,18]. The direct-reverse flotation process, in which the siliceous minerals are discharged by direct flotation while the calcareous minerals are discharged by reverse flotation, is a popular approach to separation [19,20] but one that comes with several drawbacks, including high reagent consumption, high flotation temperature, and severe environmental pollution. The gravity-flotation combination beneficiation of mid-low grade collophane has been proven effective [21,22], but the high acid consumption of the reverse flotation stage remains problematic [23].
In an effort to address this problem, researchers at the Lianyungang Chemical Mine Design and Research Institute attempted to utilize sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a dolomite collector to separate Yichang phosphate assaying 50% dolomite and 19.25% P2O5 with no other reagents through a rougher, cleaner, and scavenger; they ultimately obtained a concentrate with a grade of 30.7% P2O5 at a recovery of 82.86% [24,25]. Though successful to some extent, the severe entrainment and excessively stable foam in this process restricted its further application. These issues arose due to the small particle size of the separation feed of mid-low grade collophane, and have largely discouraged researchers from further pursuing SDS as a collector to remove dolomite from collophane.
The objective of this work is to reduce the acid consumption in the conventional gravity-flotation combination beneficiation of mid-low grade collophane via SDS. The feasibility of the proposed process was investigated by comparison against the conventional process. The proposed technique was found to be effective in significantly reducing acid consumption compared to traditional flotation techniques. In addition, the SDS action mechanisms on dolomite have been investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Phosphate ore was obtained from Yichang, Hubei Province, China. The ore was crushed to a grain size of 0~3 mm with a jaw crusher (model XPC-60 × 100) (Wuhan Boshan Machinery Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China) and a double-roll crusher (model HLXPS-Φ250 × 150) (Wuhan Exploring Machinery Factory, Wuhan, China), then wet ground to −0.074 mm accounting for 70% in a laboratory ball mill (HLXMQ-Φ 240 × 90) (Wuhan Hengle Mineral Engineering Equipment Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China) at 50 wt % solids. The ground ore is referred to from here on as “separation feed”.
The chemical composition of the raw ore was analyzed by ICP-AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry) performed on an IRIS Advantage ER/S instrument (Thermo Elemental, MA, USA). The results were shown in Table 1. The contents of P2O5, SiO2, and MgO were 23.98%, 22.14%, and 2.11%, respectively; sesquioxide (Al2O3 and Fe2O3) content was 6.40%.
The mineral composition of the raw ore was determined via X-ray diffraction (XRD) and microscopy analyses. The XRD analyses were conducted using a Rigaku D/MAX-RB X-ray diffraction (Rigaku, Akishima City, Japen) using Cu Kα radiation. The results are shown in Figure 1 and Table 2.
The raw ore mainly contained collophane, dolomite, quartz, feldspar, and clay (56.5%, 9.5%, 15.3%, 3.6%, and 12.8% of the total content, respectively) plus some calcite and pyrite. The collophane was mainly fluorapatite.
Optical microscopy was also performed to determine the main mineral dissemination characteristics. Collophane is characterized by “water chestnut”, polygonal, plate-like, and scattered states. The particles and certain edge portions are mixed with a subtle silica, quartz, and dolomite mixture (Figure 2a,b) and the individual particle is nearly entirely replaced by siliceous rock. Collophane also contains apatite (Figure 2c) embedded in the dolomite fraction, siliceous, and argillaceous pieces, as well as fine-grained pyrite. The particle size of collophane is 0.03–1 mm.
Dolomite has half-automorphic granules, and its aggregates appear to be irregular briquette granules. Most are individually scattered (Figure 2d), while some crystallize or parcel in the collophane and some are distributed as dust-like or fine granules in the collophane and argillaceous fractions. The particle size of dolomite is 0.03–0.15 mm.
Quartz is fine granular, mostly scattered in collophane and argillaceous fractions, and a small fraction are individual scattered states. The particle size of quartz is 0.03–0.4 mm.
Argillaceous fractions are water chestnut or long plates in scattered distribution mainly consisting of illite, sericite, and kaolinite. Some fractions contain quartz powder sand and some appear to be in independent distribution. A small portion appear to have crystallized (Figure 2e) or embedded in the collophane (Figure 2f). The particle size of argillaceous fractions is 0.1–1 mm.
Grain analyses were performed to further observe the characteristics of the separation feed (e.g., differences among size fractions).
The results in Table 3 showed that phosphorus was concentrated in coarse size fractions, which might be related to mineral properties: (1) The particle size of collophane is larger than dolomite and quartz; and (2) Argillaceous fractions are easy to grind. Meanwhile, the density of collophane is slightly greater than dolomite, quartz, and clay [20], so the ore can indeed be concentrated by gravity separation (and, thus, separated by a gravity-flotation combination process).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Gravity Separation Tests

Owing to the small density differences among the minerals in the raw ore and fine-grained separation feed, a spiral chute (P/D = 0.36) was selected for separation [20,26]; 3 kg of separation feed was processed with a five-turn laboratory spiral chute at a pulp density of 18 wt % solids. Tests were conducted under the condition of 215 L/h feed rate and no wash water. The products of gravity separation included concentrate and tailing.

2.2.2. Flotation Separation Tests

Flotation tests were carried out with a 0.5/0.75L XED-IV single cell flotation machine (Jilin Prospecting Machinery Factory, Changchun, China). Tests were conducted at a solid content of 33%, pulp temperature of 298 K, and impeller speed of 1725 rpm. Chemical reagents were added to the cell at different time points. Sodium carbonate, water glass, and ZY-1 (fatty acid) served as regulator, depressant, and collector, respectively, during the direct flotation tests, and phosphoric acid served as regulator and depressant during reverse flotation. As discussed above, SDS served as a dolomite collector during reverse flotation.

2.2.3. Zeta Potential Analysis Tests

A suspension containing 0.01 wt % single apatite or dolomite particles ground to −2 mm in an agate mortar was prepared in KCl solution (10−3 M). The pH value of the suspension was adjusted to the desired value using HCl or NaOH solution. The suspension was stirred with magnetic stirrer for 5 min to prepare samples for analysis. The samples were placed into a zeta analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) to measure the zeta potential of the mineral surfaces at 298 K. The tests were run in three replicates and the average is reported as the final value.

2.2.4. Single Mineral Flotation Tests

Single mineral flotation tests were carried out in a XFGC II flotation machine (Wuhan Hengle Mineral Engineering Equipment Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China) with a 40 mL flotation cell. Four grams of single collophane or dolomite (particle size 0.038–0.074 mm) and 40 mL of distilled water were added to the flotation cell, then HCl or NaOH was added to adjust the pH and the pulp was stirred for 1 min. A moderate amount of the collector was then added to the flotation cell followed by stirring for another 2.5 min, then the pH values were measured with a precise pH meter (PHS-3C). Tests were conducted at a pulp temperature of 298 K and impeller speed of 1500 rpm. The flotation time was 5 min and the froth was manually scraped. The froths obtained were dried and weighed to calculate the yield, which was reported here as the sample recovery.

2.2.5. FTIR Spectrum

The infrared spectra were obtained on a NEXUS670 spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet, MA, USA). The FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) spectra of samples were recorded in the range from 400 to 4000 cm−1. Collophane or dolomite (0.15 g, −0.045 mm) was equilibrated with 100 mL of the SDS solution at a concentration of 20 mg/L and pH of 7.5. The solution was stirred at 250 rpm for 6 h, then gently washed three times with deionized water and air-dried after conditioning. Fifty milligrams of the sample was mixed with 100 mg of KBr powder in an agate mortar, then the mixture was ground to further reduce the particle size and complete the mixing process. The powdered mixture was then pressed into a thin plate for FTIR analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Gravity Separation Test Results

The results of our gravity separation tests on the separation feed were obtained.
Table 4 illustrated where obvious concentration effects were observed during the experiment. Gravity concentrate with P2O5 28.95%, MgO 2.08%, and recovery of 57.62% P2O5 was obtained. The removal of Mg by gravity separation was so weak that the gravity concentrate failed to meet the requirements for subsequent processing. The weak effect of removing Mg may be the result of small density differences between collophane and dolomite. A sketch of the phenomenon observed in the experiment was shown in Figure 3, where the grain size of the gravity concentrate was much larger than the gravity tailing.
To quantify the differences of the grain size of gravity products, grain analyses were performed.
Figure 4 further illustrated the large differences in grain size between the gravity concentrate and gravity tailing, where +0.045 mm size fractions accounted for 77.12% in the gravity concentrate and −0.025 mm size fractions accounted for 53.36% in the gravity tailing. Theoretically, the density differences among the minerals in phosphorus ore are small, which can lead to a wide disparity in grain size of gravity products. Obviously, the test results are consistent with the theory.

3.2. Flotation Separation Test Results

A flow chart of the gravity-flotation combination process was drawn based on the flotation test results as shown in Figure 5. The rougher tests were conducted in 0.75 L flotation cell, and the cleaner tests and reverse tests were conducted in 0.5 L flotation cell. Concentrate with a grade of 31.29% P2O5 at a recovery of 89.10% was attained under the optimum reagent dosage conditions. From here on, this process is referred to as the “conventional gravity-flotation combination process”. The conventional gravity-flotation combination process comes at relatively low processing cost due to the relatively minimal quantity of direct flotation feed necessary, but the high acid consumption in the reverse flotation stage is problematic.
As discussed in the introduction, SDS has been reported as an efficient collector for dolomite removal under the condition that no other reagents are present, but it resulted in severe entrainment and excessively stable foam. Considering that the particle size of gravity concentrate was coarse, SDS was tested here as a reverse collector to remove the dolomite from gravity concentrate in the absence of any other reagents.

3.2.1. SDS Separation Performance

SDS reverse flotation tests were run to test SDS as a collector to float dolomite in the absence of any other reagents. The tests were conducted in 0.75 L flotation cell and the operating time was 2.5 min. The results indicated excellent defoaming properties of the froth product, high separation efficiency, and good separation effects overall. On the other hand, SDS was also replaced by ZY-1 and sodium oleate in subsequent tests to separate the gravity concentrate for the sake of comparison.
As shown in Table 5, the separation effect of SDS was optimal with similar concentrate yields Moreover, SDS has better resistances to hard water and low temperature compared to ZY-1 or sodium oleate, which is beneficial to flotation. Therefore, the gravity concentrate was determined to be separated by SDS in the absence of any other reagents. A test flowchart was drawn based on these results (Figure 6). From here on, this process is referred to as the “improved gravity-flotation combination process” (or simply “improved process”).

3.2.2. SDS Reverse Flotation Tests for Gravity Concentrate

Flotation tests were further run to determine the feasibility of the improved process. SDS reverse flotation tests of the gravity concentrate were conducted under various SDS dosages.
Figure 7 showed that the removal of Mg was substantial as the SDS dosage increases, but when SDS dosage reached 0.5 kg/t, the MgO content varied slightly. Excessive SDS collects more apatite, especially fine-grain apatite, while the entrainment of fine grain apatite grows severe as the SDS dosage increases. Hence, 0.4 kg/t can be considered the optimum SDS dosage.
Under these conditions, on the basis of raw ore, concentrate with P2O5 30.36%, MgO 0.84%, and recovery of 43.42% P2O5 was successfully obtained. The froth product with P2O5 25.35%, MgO 5.25% was regarded as the middling.

3.2.3. SDS Action Mechanism

As discussed above, zeta potential analysis tests and flotation tests on single cellophane and dolomite were conducted to investigate the SDS adsorption mechanism on dolomite.
Figure 8 showed where the zeta potential differences between collophane and dolomite were substantial at various pH values. Within the range of 3.0 to 9.0, higher pH decreased the zeta potential. The points of zero charge (PZC) of collophane and dolomite were about 4.7 and 6.5, respectively. The results were calculated as follows [27]:
HDS ( aq ) H + + DS
K a = [ H + ] [ DS ] [ HDS ( aq ) ]
pH pK a = lg [ DS ] [ HDS ( aq ) ]
pK a < pH < PZC
where pH is the effective pH range for electrostatic mineral collection. HDS is a strong acid [27], so pH < PZC is the effective pH range. The effective pH ranges for SDS on collophane and dolomite by electrostatic forces were pH < 4.7 and pH < 6.5, respectively.
As shown in Figure 9, when the pH ranged from 3.0 to 9.0, the recovery of dolomite gradually decreased. Namely, higher zeta potential improved the recovery, so it could be inferred that physical adsorption occurred in our experiment. Under the optimal SDS reverse flotation test conditions described above, the pulp pH is 7.5. The FTIR spectra obtained under this pH condition, as shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11, indicated that there was no apparent chemical adsorption between collophane and dolomite. In short, the SDS adsorption on dolomite is mainly physical.
The Ksp values of Mg(DS)2 and Ca(DS)2 were obtained as follows [28,29]:
Mg ( DS ) 2 Mg 2 + + 2 DS
K sp 1 = [ Mg 2 + ] [ DS ] 2 = 2.29 × 10 10
Ca ( DS ) 2 Ca 2 + + 2 DS
K sp 2 = [ Ca 2 + ] [ DS ] 2 = 1 × 10 9.7
The ratio is K sp 1 K sp 2 = 1.15 , which indicates that the chemical adsorption differences between collophane and dolomite are theoretically very small. This also indicates that favorable dolomite separation effect is not attributable to chemical absorption, but to physical adsorption.
As reported in Table 3, the average particle size of dolomite was smaller than collophane; the density differences between them is very small [20], so dolomite is more readily entrained than collophane. An entrainment phenomenon was also observed in the SDS reverse flotation tests. To this effect, the separation effect may be partly attributed to entrainment.
In summary, the SDS adsorption on dolomite is mainly physical and the favorable separation effect between collophane and dolomite can be attributed to physical adsorption and entrainment. In addition, it is inferred that the physical adsorption can be utilized to remove dolomite from phosphate on account of the zeta potential differences when the separate feed is coarse.

3.3. Quantity-Quality Flow-Sheet

The quantity-quality flow-sheet was drawn based on the flotation results.
As depicted in Figure 12, after the gravity concentrate was separated by the SDS, 75.36% of the phosphorus had been recovered and the separation feed of follow-up reverse flotation decreased by up to 44.12%. To this effect, the proposed method readily solved the problem of overweight dolomite in the gravity concentrate. Concentrate Ⅰ and concentrate Ⅱ were merged as the final concentrate, thus, under the optimum reagent dosage conditions, final concentrate with P2O5 31.31%, MgO 0.88%, and 89.23% recovery of P2O5 was obtained.

3.4. Comparison between Different Processes

To research the effects of the improved process in greater detail, the optimum reagent dosages and corresponding concentrate indices of the improved and conventional processes were compared.
Table 6 and Table 7 indicated that compared to the conventional process, the improved process reduced the dosage of phosphoric acid from 6.1 kg/t to 3.9 kg/t with similar separation results. The improved process can save 8.1 CNY/t in raw ore costs according to reagent prices current as of October 2016. In addition, the decline in acid consumption also can slows down the acid corrosion of equipment, further enhancing the economic benefits of the improved process.

4. Conclusions

  • The separation effect of SDS was optimal when SDS, ZY-1, and sodium oleate served as collectors to remove dolomite from gravity concentrate in the absence of other reagents.
  • The proposed gravity concentrate is suitable for flotation by SDS by virtue of its excellent defoaming properties, high separation efficiency, and good separation effects. Gravity concentrate containing 28.95% P2O5 and 2.08% MgO was separated by SDS, ultimately yielding concentrate with P2O5 30.36%, MgO 0.84%, and 75.36% recovery of P2O5.
  • The improved gravity-flotation combination process was proven effective in reducing the acid consumption from 6.1 kg/t to 3.9 kg/t with similar separation results compared to the conventional gravity-flotation combination process. The improved process can also save 8.1 CNY/t raw ore and slow down the acid corrosion of equipment.
  • Our analysis of the SDS action mechanism indicates that the SDS adsorption on dolomite is mainly physical, and that the favorable separation effect between collophane and dolomite can be attributed to physical adsorption and entrainment.
  • The physical adsorption can be utilized to remove dolomite from phosphate on account of zeta potential differences when the separate feed is coarse.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Science Technology Support Programs of Hubei Province, China (No. 2014BCB029).

Author Contributions

Kun Sun and Tao Liu conceived and designed the experiments; Kun Sun, Bo Wang, and Chengbao Xu performed the experiments; Xin Liu and Yimin Zhang analyzed the data; Tao Liu and Yimin Zhang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; and Kun Sun wrote this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heydarpour, T.; Rezai, B.; Gharabaghi, M. A kinetics study of the leaching of a calcareous phosphate rock by lactic acid. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89, 2153–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sis, H.; Chander, S. Reagents used in the flotation of phosphate ores: A critical review. Miner. Eng. 2003, 16, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gharabaghi, M.; Noaparast, M.; Irannajad, M. Selective leaching kinetics of low-grade calcareous phosphate ore in acetic acid. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 95, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gharabaghi, M.; Irannajad, M.; Noaparast, M. A review of the beneficiation of calcareous phosphate ores using organic acid leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 103, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tuo, B.Y.; Yang, J.J.; Han, L.; Yao, Y.L. Flotation experimental research of calcareous-siliceous phosphorite. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 146, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ge, Y.Y.; Gan, S.P.; Zeng, X.B.; Yu, Y.F. Double reverse flotation process of collophanite and regulating froth action. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2008, 18, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, S.J.; Yi, J.J.; Kong, L.H.; Jiang, A.L.; Liu, G.Y. Current status of phosphorite-ore resources in China and screening for national-class physical geological data of phopshorite. Inorg. Chem. Ind. 2016, 48, 1–6. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Dwyer, R.; Bruckard, W.J.; Rea, S.; Holmes, R.J. Bioflotation and bioflocculation review: Microorganisms relevant for mineral beneficiation. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2013, 121, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bada, S.; Gcanga, S.; Falcon, L.; Falcon, R.; Makhula, M. Electrostatic concentration of phosphate flotation concentrate. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2013, 23, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Asimellis, G.; Giannoudakos, A.; Kompitsas, M. Phosphate ore beneficiation via determination of phosphorus-to-silica ratios by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta B 2006, 61, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.H. My country and the world phosphate resources & exploitation actuality (continuation). Phosphate Compd. Fertil. 2005, 20, 9–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Xiong, Y.; Wu, B.; Zhu, J.W.; Fan, X.G.; Cai, P.X.; Wen, J.; Liu, X. Preparation of magnesium hydroxide from leachate of dolomitic phosphate ore with dilute waste acid from titanium dioxide production. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 142, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hernainz, F.; Calero, M.; Blazquez, G. Kinetic considerations in the flotation of phosphate ore. Adv. Powder Technol. 2005, 16, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abouzeid, A.Z.M.; Negm, A.T.; Elgillani, D.A. Upgrading of calcareous phosphate ores by flotation: Effect of ore characteristics. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2009, 90, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yan, Z.H. Reviews of development and utilization of phosphate resources in China. Min. Metall. 2011, 20, 21–25. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao, Q.B.; Cheng, J.H.; Wen, S.M.; Li, C.X.; Bai, S.J.; Liu, D. A mixed collector system for phosphate flotation. Miner. Eng. 2015, 78, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, G.S.; Liu, J.T.; Cao, Y.J.; Wang, D.P. Effect of a cyclonic flotation column on the separation of magnesium from phosphate ore. Min. Sci. Technol. (China) 2011, 21, 647–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, F.; Li, J. Selective separation of silica from a siliceous-calcareous phosphate rock. Min. Sci. Technol. (China) 2011, 21, 135–139. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wei, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Sandenbergh, R. Improvement of phosphate ore flotation performance through sized flotation. Int. Conf. Electron. Meas. Instrum. 2010, 9, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.M.; Liu, T.; Cai, Z.L.; Chen, T.J.; Sun, K. Beneficiation of a sedimentary phosphate ore by a combination of spiral gravity and direct-reverse flotation. Minerals 2016, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, M.C. Test on gravity-flotation complex process of mid-low grade phosphate rock in Dianchi region. Ind. Miner. Process. 2004, 5, 3–5. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Ding, H.T.; Liu, Z.H. Study of Pre-concentration by Gravity for Depositional Silicon-calcium Phosphate Ores. Guizhou Chem. Ind. 2013, 38, 3–5. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Boulos, T.R.; Yehia, A.; Ibrahim, S.S.; Yassin, K.E. A modification in the flotation process of a calcareous-siliceous phosphorite that might improve the process economics. Miner. Eng. 2014, 69, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.S.; Que, X.L. Mining Agents; Press of Metallurgy Industry: Beijing, China, 2008. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Pharmaceutical Group in Lab 2 Rooms of Chemical Mining Design and Research Institute of Ministry of Chemical Industry. The application of SDS in flotation experiments of Yichang phosphate rock. Ind. Miner. Process. 1975, 1, 36–38. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.M.; Liu, T.; Cai, Z.L.; Sun, K. Pre-concentration of vanadium from stone coal by gravity using fine mineral spiral. Minerals 2016, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, Y.H. Mineral Flotation; Press of Central South University: Changsha, China, 2014. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Ozdemir, O.; Cinar, M.; Sabah, E.; Arslan, F.; Celik, M.S. Adsorption of anionic surfactants onto sepiolite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 147, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, J.C.; Warmadewanthi; Chang, C.J. Precipitation flotation of phosphate from water. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 347, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD image of raw ore.
Figure 1. XRD image of raw ore.
Minerals 07 00029 g001
Figure 2. Optical microscopy images of raw ore observed with: (a,c,e,f) plane-polarized light; (b,d) cross-polarized light (Cp: collophane; Ap: apatite; Qf: Quartz and feldspar minerals aggregate Qt: quartz; Cm: clay minerals; Dol: dolomite).
Figure 2. Optical microscopy images of raw ore observed with: (a,c,e,f) plane-polarized light; (b,d) cross-polarized light (Cp: collophane; Ap: apatite; Qf: Quartz and feldspar minerals aggregate Qt: quartz; Cm: clay minerals; Dol: dolomite).
Minerals 07 00029 g002
Figure 3. Gravity separation phenomenon.
Figure 3. Gravity separation phenomenon.
Minerals 07 00029 g003
Figure 4. Grain analyses of gravity products.
Figure 4. Grain analyses of gravity products.
Minerals 07 00029 g004
Figure 5. Conventional gravity-flotation combination process.
Figure 5. Conventional gravity-flotation combination process.
Minerals 07 00029 g005
Figure 6. Improved gravity-flotation combination process.
Figure 6. Improved gravity-flotation combination process.
Minerals 07 00029 g006
Figure 7. Effect of SDS dosage on concentrate separation indices.
Figure 7. Effect of SDS dosage on concentrate separation indices.
Minerals 07 00029 g007
Figure 8. Effect of pH on zeta potential.
Figure 8. Effect of pH on zeta potential.
Minerals 07 00029 g008
Figure 9. Effect of pH on recovery (SDS dosage is 3 × 10-4 mol/L).
Figure 9. Effect of pH on recovery (SDS dosage is 3 × 10-4 mol/L).
Minerals 07 00029 g009
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of before and after action between dolomite and SDS.
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of before and after action between dolomite and SDS.
Minerals 07 00029 g010
Figure 11. FTIR spectra of before and after action between collophane and SDS.
Figure 11. FTIR spectra of before and after action between collophane and SDS.
Minerals 07 00029 g011
Figure 12. Quantity-quality flow-sheet of improved process.
Figure 12. Quantity-quality flow-sheet of improved process.
Minerals 07 00029 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw ore.
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw ore.
ComponentP2O5SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgO
Content (%)23.9822.144.112.2932.022.11
Table 2. Mineral composition of raw ore.
Table 2. Mineral composition of raw ore.
MineralCollophaneDolomiteQuartzFeldsparClayCalcitePyrite
Content (%)56.59.515.33.612.81.01.3
Table 3. Grain analyses of separation feed.
Table 3. Grain analyses of separation feed.
Size Fraction (mm)Yield (%)Grade (%)Distribution (%)
P2O5MgOP2O5MgO
+0.151.4028.160.601.660.40
−0.15–+0.07428.6926.311.2131.7816.41
−0.074–+0.04523.6425.202.1925.0824.47
−0.045–+0.0387.6524.002.767.739.98
−0.038–+0.0256.1222.623.205.839.26
−0.02532.5020.402.5727.9239.48
Separation Feed100.0023.752.11100.00100.00
Table 4. Gravity separation results.
Table 4. Gravity separation results.
ProductsYield (%)Grade (%)Recovery (%)
P2O5MgOP2O5MgO
Gravity concentrate47.4328.952.0857.6246.61
Gravity tailing52.5719.212.1542.3853.39
Separation feed100.0023.832.12100.00100.00
Table 5. Concentrate indexes of reverse flotation tests.
Table 5. Concentrate indexes of reverse flotation tests.
CollectorDosage (kg/t)Yield (%)P2O5 Grade (%)MgO Grade (%)
SDS0.4071.8630.360.84
ZY-10.3371.6529.431.17
Sodium oleate0.3671.4929.321.21
Table 6. Optimum reagent dosages of two processes.
Table 6. Optimum reagent dosages of two processes.
ProcessThe Optimum Reagents Dosage (kg/t)
Sodium CarbonateWater GlassCollectorPhosphoric AcidSDS
Conventional process1.40.90.56.10
Improved process1.40.90.43.90.2
Table 7. Concentrate indices of two processes.
Table 7. Concentrate indices of two processes.
ProcessThe Corresponding Indices of Concentrate (%)
YieldP2O5 GradeMgO GradeP2O5 Recovery
Conventional process67.8731.290.9389.10
Improved process67.8131.310.8889.23

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, K.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, B.; Xu, C. Application and Mechanism of Anionic Collector Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) in Phosphate Beneficiation. Minerals 2017, 7, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7020029

AMA Style

Sun K, Liu T, Zhang Y, Liu X, Wang B, Xu C. Application and Mechanism of Anionic Collector Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) in Phosphate Beneficiation. Minerals. 2017; 7(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7020029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Kun, Tao Liu, Yimin Zhang, Xin Liu, Bo Wang, and Chengbao Xu. 2017. "Application and Mechanism of Anionic Collector Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) in Phosphate Beneficiation" Minerals 7, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7020029

APA Style

Sun, K., Liu, T., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, B., & Xu, C. (2017). Application and Mechanism of Anionic Collector Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) in Phosphate Beneficiation. Minerals, 7(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7020029

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop