Next Article in Journal
Geophysical Field Data Interpolation Using Stochastic Partial Differential Equations for Gold Exploration in Dayaoshan, Guangxi, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Stratigraphic and Structural Control on Hydrothermal Dolomitization in the Middle Permian Carbonates, Southwestern Sichuan Basin (China)
Previous Article in Journal
Beryllium Mineralogy of the Kola Peninsula, RussiaA Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Depositional Architecture and Facies of a Complete Reef Complex Succession: A Case Study of the Permian Jiantianba Reefs, Western Hubei, South China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Saline Lacustrine Dolomite Cements and Its Palaeoenvironmental Significance: A Case Study of Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Bohai Sea

1
State Key Laboratory of Oil-Gas Reservoirs Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
2
College of Energy Resources, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010013
Submission received: 30 November 2018 / Revised: 20 December 2018 / Accepted: 21 December 2018 / Published: 25 December 2018

Abstract

:
The dolomite reservoirs in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Bozhong area of the Bohai Bay Basin contain a large amount of dolomite cement. Petrologic and mineralogic studies have shown that the dolomite cements can be divided into three types according to their occurrence: coating dolomite (CD), pore-lining dolomite (LD), and pore-filling dolomite (FD). The laser microsampling technique was used to analyze the C and O isotopes in the carbonate minerals. This method is an effective way to produce CO2 gas from a particular carbonate structure in a thin section, and it has a spatial resolution of 20–50 µm and an optimal precision of approximately ±0.22σ for δ13C and δ18O in carbonate standard materials. The carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions and the oxygen isotopic geothermometer results showed that the dolomitization fluid is mainly low temperature fluid, the lake basin environment is relatively closed, and the salinity index Z value is greater than 120, which indicates the invasion of seawater. CD and early-stage LD crystals were mainly very fine crystals with faint cathodoluminescence, which indicates the early formation of diagenesis. The high temperatures of late-stage LD and FD measured by oxygen isotope thermometers indicates that they formed at a deeper depth. The dolomite cements in the study area may have formed in two stages: seepage-reflux dolomitization during the penecontemporaneous period and burial dolomitization.

1. Introduction

In both carbonate and clastic reservoirs, carbonate cementation, such as calcite or dolomite cementation, is often a key factor that affects reservoir quality [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The Eocene Shahejie Formation (hereafter referred to as “E2s”), which is located in the Shijiutuo Uplift in the middle of the Bohai Sea area, is a hydrocarbon reservoir with significant exploration potential [1,15,16,17]. The QHD29-2 oil field (Qinhuangdao, China), which has reserves of 100 million tons, was found in E2s [18]. Although the dolomite reservoir in E2s is nearly 4000 m deep, its residual primary porosity is still greater than 30% [19]. Most dolomite reservoirs form in marine environments [20,21,22,23,24]; most are intercrystalline pore reservoirs that formed by dolomitization [25,26]; and some formed as karst caves or are related to hydrothermal solution and the thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. However, the reservoir space of the dolomite reservoir in E2s is largely composed of primary pores, residual primary pores, and moldic pores [19,35]. The main characteristic of the dolomite reservoir in E2s is the development of a large amount of both syngenetic and authigenic dolomite cements [36]. The essential questions regarding the dolomite cements in E2s are as follows: (1) What are the origins of the dolomite? (2) How do the different types of dolomite differ from one another? (3) What effect does the type of dolomite have on the quality of the reservoir?
Based on an analysis of the petrological characteristics, mineral compositions, and carbon–oxygen isotope compositions of the dolomite cements, this paper discusses the genetic mechanisms of dolomite and the paleoenvironment during sedimentation. This study provides important guidance for reservoir prediction in the study area and also provides an opportunity to better understand lacustrine dolomite reservoirs, which mostly form under deep burial conditions.

2. Geological Background

The study area is located in the Eastern region of the Shijiutuo Horst in the middle of the Bohai Sea area, which borders the largest hydrocarbon-generating depression in the Bohai Sea area, the Bozhong Sag (Figure 1). The Bohai Bay Basin is located in a passive continental margin of the Pacific tectonic domain, and its Paleogene strata include the Kongdian Formation (E1–2k), the Shahejie Formation (E2s), and the Dongying Formation (E3d) [19,35,36,37,38]. The Cenozoic tectonic evolution can be divided into three stages. (1) E1–2k–E2s3 was an extensional rift stage. Regional horizontal extension occurred, which was affected by mantle thermal activity, and an inherited boundary fracture developed in the depression and horst. (2) E2s2–E3d was a rift-subsidence stage. The fault activity decreased, and the basin was widely denuded during the Dongying sedimentary period. (3) The Neogene–Quaternary was the depression stage. Many secondary faults formed during this stage, forming a Y-shaped structure with the main fractures in the section (Figure 1) [18,39]. The Kongdian Formation in the study area consists of alluvial fan deposits that are mainly composed of interbedded mudstone and sandstone [40]. The Dongying Formation is mainly composed of mudstone, sandstone, and some interlayer siltstones, which are delta and lacustrine deposits [18]. E2s is mainly composed of fan delta deposits. However, at the front edge of the fan delta, carbonate platforms developed in the relatively high structures, where it was suitable for colonisation by gastropods and ostracods due to the shallow water, abundant sunlight, and minimal influence of terrigenous clasts [41,42,43]. The Paleogene E2s contains several sets of bioclastic dolostones to the north and south of the Eastern margin of the Shijiutuo Uplift. This bioclastic dolostone is favorable for hydrocarbon reserves due to its high porosity and permeability [44] and is the main rock type of this study.

3. Materials and Methods

One hundred and sixteen core samples were collected from the 5 recently drilled exploration wells in the Shijiutuo Uplift for physical analysis (including 88 carbonate samples and 28 mudstone samples). The samples were prepared as thin sections or ground to powders for petrographic, mineralogical, geochemical, and isotopic analyses. All of the thin sections were highly polished without coverslips and impregnated with blue epoxy to facilitate the identification of the pore space [45]. The sections were also stained with alizarin red S and potassium ferricyanide solutions to identify different types of carbonate cement (calcite stains red, whereas dolomite does not stain) [46].
Optical microscopy (Leica DM4500P) (Leica Microsystems Inc, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to observe the microscopic characteristics of the thin sections to determine their mineral compositions and diagenetic characteristics and to quantify their dolomite contents. A field-emission environmental scanning electron microscope (Quanta 250 FEG) (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to identify the minerals that could not be distinguished with a polarizing microscope. Furthermore, an energy spectrum analysis was used to determine the species of minerals that were difficult to identify due to their microcrystalline forms. This analysis was performed with acceleration voltages of 0.1 to 30 kV and working distances of 10 to 20 mm at a room temperature of 20 °C and a humidity of 51%.
Cathodoluminescence energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS-X2072) can be used to differentiate between the original forms of authigenic dolomite; this analysis was performed using a vacuum level of 0.3 Pa, a beam voltage of 7.5 kV, and a beam current of 630–760 μA. Fluid inclusions were analyzed by a Linkam THMS 600 heating–freezing stage in conjunction with an Olympus BX51 microscope, in which the measured temperatures ranged from −190 to 600 °C, and the homogenization temperature error was <2 °C. During the temperature analysis, the heating rate was initially controlled within 10 °C/min and then within 1 °C/min when approaching the critical phase transition.
Carbon and oxygen isotope (δ13C and δ18O) compositions were determined by the laser microsampling technique, which is a useful tool that focuses a high-power laser beam onto a carbonate sample to liberate CO2 gas. The method uses a coaxial installation of a Nd:YAG laser (InnoLas, German) with a modified microscope. A high energy laser beam is focused on a thin slice sample in the vacuum sample box using the microscope’s optical focusing system. The sample microarea is heated (>1500 °C), and the decomposed CO2 gas is purified by the purification line and then imported into the microinjection system of an isotopic ratio mass spectrometer (Finnigan MAT252) (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). Compared to conventional methods, the microsampling technique can provide significant amounts of high resolution in situ data with a spatial resolution of 20–50 µm and an optimal precision of approximately ±0.22σ for both δ13C and δ18O in carbonate standard materials [47]. The stable carbon and oxygen isotope data are presented in δ notation relative to the Vienna Peedee Belemnite (VPDB) standard.
Using a polarizing microscope to observe the authigenic dolomites in different regions, we marked the key areas where electron probe microanalysis was required (see Section 4.1 below). An EPMA 1720H electron probe microanalyzer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to determine the chemical compositions of the different types of authigenic dolomite. The experimental conditions included an acceleration voltage of 15 KV, a beam spot size of 30 μm, and a beam current of 10 nA.
To analyze the chemical compositions of the sedimentary environment, we conducted whole-rock analyses of 28 mudstone samples from E2s. The macroelemental analysis of the mudstone was performed with a Shimadzu XRF-1700/1500 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

4. Results

4.1. Petrophysical Characteristics

Based on petrographic observations, the bioclastic dolostone are mainly composed of bioclasts, terrigenous clasts, and intergranular micrite dolomite. The bioclasts are mainly gastropod and ostracoda fossils. Some of the fossil shells are replaced by dolomite, but the outline of the fossil remains intact (Figure 2a and Figure 3e). Abundant authigenic dolomite has developed in the bioclastic dolostone of E2s (including dolomitization after sedimentation and directly precipitated dolomite). The thin sections and SEM analysis revealed that the authigenic dolomite of E2s occurs in three forms.
(1) Coating dolomite (CD)
This type of dolomite consists of very fine (mostly from 10 to 15 μm crystals), generally planar-s to planar-e crystalline structures that cover bioclastic and oolitic carbonate particles and occur as micron-sized curved rhombic crystals. This type commonly forms a thin coating around grains and inside moldic pores (Figure 2a,b, Figure 3a and Figure 4a,c). Most of the CD exhibited faint dull red luminescence under the cathodoluminoscope (Figure 3a,b).
(2) Pore-lining dolomite (LD)
This type of dolomite consists of fine (mostly from 15 to 20 μm crystals), generally planar-s to planar-e dolomite crystals. This type of dolomite grows in the pore spaces between grains but does not develop at the points where the grains were in contact with each other (Figure 2c–e and Figure 4a,b,d,e). In general, LD showed significantly enhanced cathodoluminescence, but different generations varied in their degree of luminescence. First-generation (LD-1), second-generation (LD-2) and third-generation (LD-3) dolomites exhibited bright orange light, bright red light and dull red light, respectively (Figure 3c,d).
(3) Pore-filling dolomite (FD)
This type of dolomite is found in the remaining pore space after the growth of pore-lining dolomite or the filling of moldic cavities. FD is composed of fine crystals (125 to 200 μm) containing a small proportion of finer planar-s to planar-e dolomite crystals (Figure 2e,f and Figure 4b,e). Most of the FD displayed luminescence of moderately bright orange light (Figure 3e,f).
E2s contains some oolites locally, which are generally superficial oolites. However, a few oolites with multiple concentric layers also developed (Figure 3g and Figure 4f). In particular, those that have layers composed entirely of micrite dolomite have different cathodoluminescence in different layers (Figure 3g,h).

4.2. Geochemistry

4.2.1. Fluid Inclusion Microthermometry

In this paper, only one homogenization temperature data point, 27.8 °C, was obtained in the LD at a depth of 3382.1 m in well Q3, and no freezing point temperature data were obtained, which are mainly affected by factors such as small fluid inclusions, irregular shapes, and fuzzy boundaries between the inclusions and the host minerals.

4.2.2. Carbon and Oxygen Isotopes

The carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of the CD in E2s (Table 1) showed that the δ13C values had a slightly broad range of 0.32‰ to 5.69‰ VPDB (mean 3‰ VPDB). The δ18O isotopic values ranged from −5.82‰ to −0.97‰ VPDB (mean −3.4‰ VPDB). The mean δ13C and δ18O values of the LD were 2.89‰ (from −0.42‰ to 5.41‰ VPDB) and −4.53‰ (from −9.35‰ to −0.76‰ VPDB), respectively. The δ13C values of the FD ranged from −0.51‰ to 4.08‰ VPDB with an average value of 1.46‰ VPDB, whereas there was a wide range of δ18O isotopic values from −9.34‰ to −2.27‰ VPDB (mean of −5.59‰ VPDB). Previous studies have suggested that the δ13C values of typical lacustrine carbonate rocks range −2‰ to 6‰ and that the δ18O values vary from −8‰ to −4‰ [17,48,49]. The comparison showed that the carbon isotope compositions in the study area generally conform to the characteristics of typical lacustrine carbonate rocks, but the oxygen isotope compositions have an obvious positive deviation.

4.2.3. Calcium and Magnesium Compositional Characteristics

In the mudstone samples from E2s, the MgO contents ranged from 0.64% to 4.68%, and the Mg2+/Ca2+ (molar) contents ranged from 0.18 to 4.84 (mean of 2.12; n = 28), indicating Mg2+-rich characteristics (Table 2). The analysis of the compositions of different circular oolitic layers revealed that the mean MgO and CaO contents of the inner layers were 36.92% and 60.1%, respectively, which were higher than those of the outer layers. However, FeO exhibited the opposite distribution, with the outermost layer having a higher content than the inner layers. The MgO contents of different dolomites showed that the LD had the maximum value (mean of 42.24%; n = 9), followed by the CD (mean of 38.15%; n = 4), whereas that of the FD was relatively low (mean of 37.43%; n = 4) (Table 3 and Figure 4f).

5. Discussion

5.1. Oxygen Isotope Geothermometer

Urey et al. first proposed that the 18O contents of carbonate rocks could be used to determine the temperature at which they formed, and they applied this concept to the reconstruction of Late Cretaceous paleo-oceanic temperatures in England, Denmark and the Southeastern United States. Many “paleotemperature” equations depend on the δ18O contents of carbonate and water [50,51,52]. This paper employed the oxygen isotope temperature fractionation equation recommended by Vasconcelos:
1000lnαd-w = 2.73 × 106 × T−2 + 0.26
where αd-w is the oxygen isotope fractionation coefficient between dolomite and water, and T is the temperature in Kelvin [53]. We chose LD at a depth of 3382.1 m, which has a homogenization temperature of 27.8 °C, for which the δ18O isotopic value was −0.76 based on the laser microsampling technique (Table 1). Therefore, a δ18Ow of −0.7647‰ could be calculated using Equation (1). The results are shown in Table 1. The paleotemperatures of the CD ranged from 28.9 to 56.9 °C, whereas those of the LD and FD ranged from 27.8 to 83.1 °C and from 35.6 to 83 °C, respectively. Currently, the boundary between low temperature and high temperature dolomitization in geological environments is still controversial [54,55]. In this paper, we chose 80 °C as the approximate boundary between low temperature and high temperature dolomitization environments. Therefore, most of the dolomitization fluids of E2s in the Shijiutuo Uplift area were low temperature dolomitization fluids [55].

5.2. Paleoenvironmental Analysis

The carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of dolomite can be used to analyze whether the lake basin was open or closed and to quantitatively determine the paleosalinity of the sedimentary environment [17,55,56]. In open freshwater lakes, the water remains in the lake for a short time, and the δ13C and δ18O values of the carbonate rocks are both negative; there is no obvious correlation, such as in Hulleh in Israel, Greifensee in Switzerland and Henderson in the United States. In a closed saltwater lake environment, the water is stable, and the δ13C and δ18O values of the carbonate rocks have a significant synchronous correlation; the more strongly the system is sealed, the higher the correlation coefficient, such as in Atlanton-Magadi and Turkana in Africa and the Great Salt Lake in North America (Figure 5). The correlation coefficient of the carbon and oxygen isotopes in the study area is 0.7, indicating that the two are correlated. The drop point falls in the second quadrant, and it is speculated that the lake basin water body of E2s in the Shijiutuo area had a certain amount of closure during the sedimentation period; however, the correlation is relatively weak, which indicates that the changes in the carbon and oxygen isotopes are not affected by a single factor [57,58].
Both δ18O and δ13C isotope values are related to salinity, and the variation trend is that the higher the salinity is, the higher the δ value is. Keith and Weber (1964) proposed the use of Z values to distinguish between marine and terrestrial environments [59]. Marine facies are represented by Z values greater than 120, whereas continental facies have Z values less than 120. The formula for the Z value is Z = 2.048(δ13Cd + 50) + 0.498(δ18Od + 50), where δ13Cd and δ18Od are the isotopic compositions of dolomite (VPDB). The results show that most of the dolomite samples have Z values of >125, which indicates that these dolomites formed in a high-salinity saltwater environment. Based on the salinity formula S = δ18Od + 21.2/0.61 (where δ18Od is the isotopic composition of dolomite), the average salinity of the study area is 29.7‰ (Table 1), which represents a saltwater lake [58]. The high salinity characteristics are mainly caused by two factors. First, the paleoclimate was relatively hot at the time of sedimentation of E2s, the lake water was relatively closed, and the evaporation was intense, resulting in less lake water input than evaporation. Second, it is speculated that E2s in the study area was affected by seawater invasion, and the intrusion of high salinity seawater increased the salinity of the lake water [58,60,61]. In the relatively closed ancient environment, the small influence of surface runoff and the high salinity of the water body may explain the high δ18O values relative to typical lacustrine carbonate rocks.

5.3. Genetic Analysis of Authigenic Dolomite

Dolomites form under different conditions and in different depositional environments [51]. Despite decades of intense study, it is still difficult to provide an unequivocal genetic interpretation that traces the complete depositional and burial evolution of a dolomite [25]. It is generally agreed that any dolomitization model must (1) explain the supply of Mg2+ and (2) provide a delivery mechanism (e.g., hydrological and thermodynamic conditions) [62,63].

5.3.1. Source of Mg2+

Mg2+ in Pulveryte

The elemental analysis showed that the mudstone in E2s contained high proportions of MgO, with an average content of 2.07%, which is similar to the MgO contents of mudstones in typical salt lakes [38,64,65,66,67,68,69]. The mean value of Mg2+/Ca2+ (mol) is 2.1, which is much larger than that of standard stoichiometric dolomite and indicates that this mudstone is Mg-rich (Table 2). A large amount of Mg2+ can be released from mudstones into the pore fluid during burial by various processes, such as hydration, compaction, and dehydration, which provide the essential material conditions for the formation of dolomite during diagenesis [56,70,71,72,73].

Mg2+ in Intraclasts

E2s contains abundant carbonate intraclasts and bioclasts. As indicated by the compositional analysis of various cortical laminae of oolites, the MgO contents exhibited certain evolutionary characteristics (Figure 6a). The MgO contents were higher in the inner layers than in the outermost layers, indicating that Mg was enriched in the sedimentary fluid during the early stages. With the continuous depletion of Mg caused by the oolitic circle formation, the MgO contents in the outermost circular layers decreased. The FeO contents were lower in the early-stage circular layers and higher in the outermost circular layers (Figure 6b), which also indicates that the environment changed from an oxidative environment to a reductive environment.

Mg2+ from Seawater Invasion

The concentration of Mg2+ in seawater is much higher than that in lake water and the salinity index Z value of dolomite in the study area is greater than 120, which indicates the possibility that seawater may have entered the lake basin periodically during the sedimentation of E2s, which led to the increasing salinity of the lake basin water. In addition, previous studies have found that Sr/Ba values of E2s in several depressions of Bohai Bay Basin were greater than 1 [58,60,61], indicating that the study area may be affected by transgression.

5.3.2. Delivery Mechanism

The fluid driving force is another key factor for dolomite formation [62,63]. The driving force of Mg2+ fluid in the study area mainly had the following two mechanisms. First, heavy saltwater formed on the surface of the lake by evaporation and moved to the bottom of the lake due to the effect of density [55,74,75]. Second, on the edge of the lake basin or in the uplifted region of grain beach facies, the highly concentrated brine was affected by gravity flows along the slopes on either side of the ancient uplift [18,19].

5.3.3. Model for the Origin of Authigenic Dolomite

The temperature dependence on the oxygen isotope geothermometers indicated that the formation temperatures of the authigenic dolomite had a slightly broad range (from 27.8 to 83.1 °C). The sedimentary paleogeomorphology and rock mineral characteristics indicate that the lacustrine dolomite in E2s in the Shijiutuo Uplift formed in two stages. The first stage was the reflux and infiltration of brine. Due to the evaporation of lake water, seawater invasion, and the compaction and dehydration of fine sediments, the concentration of Mg2+ in the lake water increased significantly. This Mg2+-rich lake water flowed to the lake bottom due to density and gravity. The lake-bottom water had poor circulation, which resulted in a reducing environment and high-salinity alkaline water conditions. Dolomitization occurred when heavy brine penetrated further into the larger limestone layers. Because of the rapid nucleation and crystallization of the dolomite that formed in this environment, very fine crystals of CD or early LD formed. The second stage was the adjustment stage of burial. With increasing burial depth and the reduction environment, the Fe2+ content in the dolomite increased (Figure 6b). In addition, early dolomite adjusted and enhanced the dolomitization to form larger crystal LD or FD.

5.4. Geological Significance

A large number of studies have confirmed that carbonate cements have a significant impact on reservoir quality and are generally considered to be negative [76,77,78,79]. Recent evidence has shown that carbonate cements have two competing influences on the physical properties of reservoirs—they occupy pore space but also help to resist compaction [9,80,81].
The petrographic analysis, cathodoluminescence analysis, and oxygen isotope characteristics described above indicated that the authigenic dolomites in the study area mainly formed in the early diagenetic stage. The microscopy observations revealed that most of the LD grew around the intergranular pores and did not develop in the areas in which the particles came into contact. However, the presence of CD-covered particles indicated that it grew before the particles were in contact with each other, which means that the CD may be penecontemporaneous dolomite. The CD crystals were mainly very fine crystals that were smaller than the LD crystals (Figure 2a,b). This finding indicated that the CD formed during the same period as the early LD or before it. The cathodoluminescence of the CD was faint (Figure 3a,b), which indicated that it had not experienced strong diagenetic alteration and formed during early diagenesis. The LD with a blade-like or overhanging appearance may represent the formation of this cement in the vadose zone [82]. According to oxygen isotope geothermometers, most of the dolomitization fluids in E2s in the Shijiutuo Uplift area were low temperature dolomitization fluids. During this early diagenetic stage, the microcrystalline CD developed around particles, the early lining dolomite precipitated in the intergranular pores, and the Mg content of the dolomitization fluids decreased continuously. Once the dolomitization fluids had exhausted their Mg, they continued to flow basin-ward without causing further dolomitization. If sufficient Mg2+ remained in the pore fluid, it would form FD or late LD (i.e., second-generation or third-generation LD) (Figure 7) [55,83]. The coating and early-stage LD (first-generation lining) developed during early diagenesis, thus allowing the grains to support each other and to resist further mechanical compaction. However, the late-stage LD (second- or third-generation lining) and the FD mainly caused a significant decrease in porosity by filling the interparticle pores and moldic pores. Therefore, the carbonate cements that formed in the early stage of diagenesis played a positive role in the physical properties of the reservoir, whereas the carbonate cements that formed in the late stages of diagenesis played a negative role [84,85]. However, further work is needed to quantify the effects of the different types of cements on the quality of the reservoir.

6. Conclusions

The carbon isotopic compositions of different types of dolomite cements in E2s in the Shijiutuo Horst area mostly range from −2‰ to 6‰, which conforms to the characteristics of typical lacustrine carbonate rocks. However, the oxygen isotope compositions have an obvious positive deviation. The relatively closed paleoenvironment, the small influence of surface runoff, and the high salinity of the water body may explain the high δ18O values relative to typical lacustrine carbonate rocks. The sedimentary environment of E2s in the study area was a relatively closed lake environment with high salinity. As a result, the diagenetic fluids were rich in Mg2+ (due to the evaporation of lake water, seawater invasion, and the compaction and dehydration of fine sediments), which is necessary for the formation of authigenic dolomite.
The dolomite cements in the study area may have experienced two stages of dolomitization: seepage-reflux dolomitization during the penecontemporaneous period and burial dolomitization. The CD and LD formed in the early stage of diagenesis, which may have enhanced the strength of these rocks and played a positive role in the reservoir’s physical properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M., Z.L. and Z.S.; Data curation, H.M. and C.X.; Investigation, Z.S.; Methodology, Z.L.; Software, C.X.; Supervision, Z.L.; Writing–original draft, H.M.; Writing–review and editing, H.M., Z.L. and Z.S.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Science & Technology Specific Project (Grant No. 2011ZX05023-006).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Bath, A.; Milodowski, A.; Spiro, B. Diagenesis of carbonate cements in Permo-Triassic sandstones in the Wessex and East Yorkshire-Lincolnshire Basins, UK: A stable isotope study. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1987, 36, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Munawar, M.J.; Lin, C.; Dong, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, H.; Azeem, T.; Zahid, M.A.; Ma, C. Architecture and reservoir quality of low-permeable Eocene lacustrine turbidite sandstone from the Dongying Depression, East China. Open Geosci. 2018, 10, 87–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chowdhury, A.H.; Noble, J.P.A. Origin, distribution and significance of carbonate cements in the Albert Formation reservoir sandstones, New Brunswick, Canada. Mar. Pet. Geol. 1996, 13, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dutton, S.P.; Flanders, W.A. Evidence of reservoir compartmentalization by calcite cement layers in deepwater sandstones, Bell Canyon Formation, Delaware Basin, Texas. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2004, 237, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dutton, S.P. Calcite cement in Permian deep-water sandstones, Delaware Basin, west Texas: Origin, distribution, and effect on reservoir properties. AAPG Bull. 2008, 92, 765–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Taylor, T.R.; Giles, M.R.; Hathon, L.A.; Diggs, T.N.; Braunsdorf, N.R.; Birbiglia, G.V.; Kittridge, M.G.; Macaulay, C.I.; Espejo, I.S. Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction: Models, myths, and reality. AAPG Bull. 2010, 94, 1093–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, J.; Chen, B.; Chen, F.; Cheng, C.; Li, Y.; Tian, Y. Paleogene lacustrine dolomitization, Xingou region, southern Qianjiang Depression, China. Geosci. J. 2016, 20, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Liu, K.; Liu, J.; Xue, X.; Xu, Q. Pore fluid evolution, distribution and water-rock interactions of carbonate cements in red-bed sandstone reservoirs in the Dongying Depression, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2016, 72, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiong, D.; Azmy, K.; Blamey, N.J.F. Diagenesis and origin of calcite cement in the Flemish Pass Basin sandstone reservoir (Upper Jurassic): Implications for porosity development. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2016, 70, 93–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bustillo, M.A.; Armenteros, I.; Huerta, P. Dolomitization, gypsum calcitization and silicification in carbonate-evaporite shallow lacustrine deposits. Sedimentology 2017, 64, 1147–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cui, Y.; Jones, S.J.; Saville, C.; Stricker, S.; Wang, G.; Tang, L. The role played by carbonate cementation in controlling reservoir quality of the Triassic Skagerrak Formation, Norway. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2017, 85, 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cui, Y.; Wang, G.; Jones, S.J.; Zhou, Z.; Ran, Y.; Lai, J.; Li, R. Prediction of diagenetic facies using well logs—A case study from the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2017, 81, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Y.; Qiu, L.; Gregg, J.M.; Puckette, J.; Liu, K. Characterization of lacustrine carbonate reservoirs in the eocene Sikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Carbonates Evaporites 2017, 32, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tutolo, B.M.; Tosca, N.J. Experimental examination of the mg-silicate-carbonate system at ambient temperature: Implications for alkaline chemical sedimentation and lacustrine carbonate formation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 225, 80–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, G. An evaluation of exploration potential in Bodong area from the major discovery of shallow oil and gas in Shijiutuo Uplift. China Offshore Oil Gas 2000, 14, 84–92, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, Y.; Xue, Y.; Wang, G.; Li, G. Shallow layer hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and their exploration significances in Shijiutuo Uplift, Bohai Sea. China Offshore Oil Gas 2015, 27, 8–16, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  17. Pan, W.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S.; Feng, C.; Tian, D. Origin of lacustrine bioclastic dolostone in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation: A case study in Shijiutuo area, Bohai Sea. J. Palaeogeogr. 2017, 19, 835–848. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shi, W.; Li, H.; Mao, L.; Yang, H.; Chen, L.; Yu, H. Hydrocarbon Geological Characteristics and Exploration Potential of Qinnan Depression in Offshore Area of Bohai Sea. China Pet. Explor. 2014, 19, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lv, Z.X.; Song, X.Z.; Qing, Y.; Qi, Y.; Jin, X. Characteristics of deep and high-quality Paleogene lacustrine carbonate reservoir in central Bohai Sea. Nat. Gas Ind. 2015, 36, 10–17, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Melim, L.A.; Swart, P.K.; Eberli, G.P. Mixing-zone Diagenesis in the subsurface of Florida and the Bahamas. J. Sediment. Res. 2004, 74, 904–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Y.; Guo, X.; Guo, T.; Huang, R.; Cai, X.; Li, G. The puguang gas field: New giant discovery in the mature Sichuan Basin, southwest China. AAPG Bull. 2007, 91, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Breesch, L.; Swennen, R.; Vincent, B.; Ellison, R.; Dewever, B. Dolomite cementation and recrystallisation of sedimentary breccias along the Musandam Platform margin (United Arab Emirates). J. Geochem. Explor. 2010, 106, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Iannace, A.; Frijia, G.; Galluccio, L.; Parente, M. Facies and early dolomitization in Upper Albian shallow-water carbonates of the southern Apennines (Italy): Paleotectonic and paleoclimatic implications. Facies 2014, 60, 169–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, M.; Lin, X.; Tian, J.C.; Peng, S.F.; Xu, L.; Su, L. Study on variously dolomitized reservoir reef at platform margin of Changxing Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin, southwestern China. Carbonates Evaporites 2018, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  25. Warren, J. Dolomite: Occurrence, evolution and economically important associations. Earth Sci. Rev. 2000, 52, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, W.Z.; Shen, A.J.; Zheng, J.F.; Qiao, Z.F.; Wang, X.F.; Lu, J.M. The porosity origin of dolostone reservoirs in the Tarim, Sichuan and Ordos basins and its implication to reservoir prediction. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2014, 57, 2498–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mariusz, P.; Andrzej, P.; Karina, A.; Aleksandra, P.; Marcin, S. The significance of Chara vegetation in the precipitation of lacustrine calcium carbonate. Sedimentology 2013, 60, 1017–1035. [Google Scholar]
  28. Grotzinger, J.; Al-Rawahi, Z. Depositional facies and platform architecture of microbialite-dominated carbonate reservoirs, Ediacaran-Cambrian Ara Group, Sultante of Om. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. 2014, 98, 1453–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chagas, A.A.P.; Webb, G.E.; Burne, R.V.; Southam, G. Modern lacustrine microbialites: Towards a synthesis of aqueous and carbonate geochemistry and mineralogy. Earth Sci. Rev. 2016, 162, 338–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qing, H.R.; Mountjoy, E.W. Formation of coarsely crystalline, hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs in the Presquile Barrier, western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Am. Assoc. AAPG Bull. 1994, 78, 55–77. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hollis, C.; Bastesen, E.; Boyce, A.; Corlett, H.; Gawthorpe, R.; Hirani, J.; Rotevatn, A.; Whitaker, F. Fault-controlled dolomitization in a rift basin. Geology 2017, 45, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jiang, L.; Worden, R.H.; Yang, C. Thermochemical sulphate reduction can improve carbonate petroleum reservoir quality. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 223, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Aasm, I.; Lonnee, J.; Clarke, J. Multiple fluid flow events and the formation of saddle dolomite: Examples from middle Devonian carbonates of the western Canada Sedimentary Basin. J. Geochem. Explor. 2000, 69–70, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Feng, M.; Wu, P.; Qiang, Z. Hydrothermal dolomite reservoir in the Precambrian Dengying Formation of central Sichuan Basin, southwestern China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2017, 82, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Li, J.; Lai, W. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of the paleogene Sha-2 member in 36-3 structure, eastern Shijiutuo Uplift, Bohai Sea. Oil Gas Geol. 2011, 32, 832–838, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  36. Qing, Y.H.; Lv, Z.X.; Wang, X.D.; Song, X.Z.; Zhang, S.L.; Meng, H.L. Porosity evolution of high-quality reservoirs in deep palaeogene lacustrine carbonate rocks in the central bohai sea. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ni, J.; Sun, L.; Li, G.; He, J.; Zhao, W.; Liu, X. Depositional patterns of the 2nd member of the Shahejie Formation in Q oilfield of the Shijiutuo Uplift, Bohai Sea. Oil Gas Geol. 2013, 34, 491–498, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  38. Peng, L. Heterogeneity and Controlling Factors of Lithofacies of the Lower 3rd Member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation Lacustrine Shale in Jiyang Depression. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2017. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Tao, N.; Zhang, X.; Gao, Y.; Hui, W.; Fan, T.; Bu, F. Controlling of Paleogeomorphology to Paleogene Sedimentary System of Shijiutuo Uplift in Bohai Basin. J. Jilin Univ. 2015, 45, 1590–1596. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, J.P.; Zhou, X.H. On the distribution of the kongdian formation in the Bohai area with special reference to its bearings on oil exploration. J. Stratigr. 2010, 34, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Q.M.; Du, X.F.; Jia, D.H.; Wan, L.W. The 1st and 2nd members of the Shahejie Formation in No.428 uplifted area, Bohai Sea: Sedimentary systems and their controlling factors. Sedim. Geol. Tethyan Geol. 2015, 35, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Bu, F.; Gao, Y. Reservoir modeling of complex lithologies with sparse wells: A case from a oilfield in Shijiutuo uplift, Bohai Bay Basin. Oil Gas Geol. 2016, 37, 450–456, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu, H.Z.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, T.; Chuai, Y.; Yang, H. Discovery of Bioclastic Dolostone in the Second Member of Shahejie Formation in Bozhong Depression and Its Significance in Oil Exploration. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2010, 28, 60–64. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lv, Z.X.; Zhang, S.L.; Yin, C.; Meng, H.L. Features and genesis of Paleogene high-quality reservoirs in lacustrine mixed siliciclastic-carbonate sediments, central Bohai Sea, China. Pet. Sci. 2017, 14, 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  45. Blamey, N.J.F.; Azmy, K.; Brand, U. Provenance and burial history of cement in sandstones of the Northbrook Formation (Carboniferous), western Newfoundland, Canada: A geochemical investigation. Sediment. Geol. 2014, 299, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lindholm, R.C.; Finkelman, R.B. Calcite staining, semiquantitative determination of ferrous iron. J. Sediment. Res. 1972, 42, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luo, P.; Su, L.P.; Luo, Z. Application of laser micro-sampling technique to analysis of C and O isotopes of oolitic dolomites in Feixianguan Formation. Northeast Sichuan Geochim. 2006, 35, 325–330. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kelts, K.; Talbot, M. Lacustrine Carbonates as Geochemical Archives of Environmental Change and Biotic/Abiotic Interactions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1990; pp. 288–315. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pan, L.Y.; Huang, G.P.; Shou, J.F.; Liu, Z.G. A Preliminary Study of Formation Environment of the Neogene Lacustrine Carbonates in Nanyishan Area of Qaidam Basin: Constrains from Carbon-Oxygen Isotope and Fluid Inclusion Analysis. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Ceochem. 2009, 28, 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  50. Urey, H.C.; Lowenstam, H.A.; Epstein, S.; Mckinney, C.R. Measurement of paleotemperatures and temperatures of the upper cretaceous of England, Denmark, and the southeastern United States. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1951, 62, 399–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Qing, H. Petrography and geochemistry of early-stage, fine- and medium-crystalline dolomites in the Middle Devonian Presqu’ile Barrier at Pine Point, Canada. Sedimentology 1998, 45, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Matthews, A.; Katz, A. Oxygen isotope fractionation during the dolomitization of calcium carbonate. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1977, 41, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vasconcelos, C.; Mckenzie, J.A.; Warthmann, R.; Bernasconi, S.M. Calibration of the δ18O paleothermometer for dolomite precipitated in microbial cultures and natural environments. Geology 2005, 33, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lovering, T.S. The origin of hydrothermal and low temperature dolomite. Econ. Geol. 1969, 64, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Machel, H.G. Concepts and models of dolomitization: A critical reappraisal. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2004, 235, 7–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Talbot, M.R. A review of the palaeohydrological interpretation of carbon and oxygen isotopic ratios in primary lacustrine carbonates. Chem. Geol. Isotope Geosci. 1990, 8, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yuan, J.Y.; Huang, C.G.; Cao, Z.L.; Li, Z.Y.; Wan, C. Carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of saline lacustrine dolomite and its palaeoenvironmental significance: A case study of Lower Eocene Ganchaigou Formation in western Qaidam Basin. Geochimica 2015, 44, 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang, B.J.; Cai, M.J.; Lin, C.M.; Zhang, X. Characteristics and origin of lacustrine dolostone of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Tanggu area, Bohai Bay Basin. J. Palaeogeogr. 2014, 16, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  59. Keith, M.L.; Weber, J.N. Carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of selected limestones and fossils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1964, 28, 1787–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, G.M.; Zhong, J.H.; Jiang, Z.X. Possible transgressive channel in paleogene deduced by lateral change of palaeosalinity in 1st Member of Shahejie Formation in Jiyang Depression. World Geol. 2005, 24, 243–247. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yuan, W.F.; Zeng, C.M.; Chen, S.Y. Characteristic of dinosterane and C31 Sterane in Paleocene Saline Formation of Jiyang Depression. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2008, 26, 683–687. [Google Scholar]
  62. Morrow, D.W. Diagenesis, 2. Dolomite—Part 2-dolomitization models and ancient dolostones. Research 1982, 9, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhao, H.W.; Brian, J. Genesis of fabric-destructive dolostones: A case study of the Brac Formation (Oligocene), Cayman Brac, British West Indies. Sediment. Geol. 2012, 267–268, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Braitsch, O. Salt Deposits Their Origin and Composition; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  65. Carroll, D. Clay minerals: A guide to their X-ray identification. Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am. 1970, 126, 1–80. [Google Scholar]
  66. Darby, D.A. Kaolinite and other clay minerals in Arctic Ocean sediments. J. Sediment. Petrol. 1975, 45, 272–279. [Google Scholar]
  67. Degens, E.T. Geochemistry of Sediments: A Brief Survey; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  68. Xu, C. Preliminary research on clay minerals in salt lake sediments of china and its significance. Sci. China Chem. 1991, 34, 490–501. [Google Scholar]
  69. Xuan, Z. Review for the 50-years History of the Chinese Potassium Salts and the Prospects. J. Salt Lake Res. 2000, 8, 58–62. [Google Scholar]
  70. Jodry, R.L. Growth and Dolomitization of Silurian Reefs, St. Clair County, Michigan. AAPG Bull. 1969, 53, 957–981. [Google Scholar]
  71. Machel, H.G.; Anderson, J.H. Pervasive subsurface dolomitization of the Nisku Formation in central Alberta. J. Sediment. Petrol. 1989, 59, 891–911. [Google Scholar]
  72. Garven, G.; Freeze, R. Theoretical analysis of the role of groundwater flow in the genesis of stratabound ore deposits. Am. J. Sci. 1984, 284, 1085–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Folk, R.L. Mg/Ca ratio and salinity: Two controls over crystallization of dolomite. AAPG Bull. 1975, 59, 60–68. [Google Scholar]
  74. Huang, C.G.; Yuan, J.Y.; Wu, L.Y. Origin and research methods of lacustrine dolomite. Lithol. Reserv. 2016, 28, 7–15, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  75. Bjørlykke, K. Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties. Some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins. Sediment. Geol. 2014, 301, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rossi, C.; Marfil, R.; Ramseyer, K. Facies-Related Diagenesis and Multiphase Siderite Cementation and Dissolution in the Reservoir Sandstones of the Khatatba Formation, Egypt’s Western Desert. J. Sediment. Res. 2001, 71, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kantorowicz, J.D.; Bryant, I.D.; Dawans, J.M. Controls on the geometry and distribution of carbonate cements in Jurassic sandstones: Bridport Sands, southern England and Viking Group, Troll Field, Norway. Geol. Soc. Lond. Speci. Publ. 1987, 36, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, Z.Q. Calcite cements in Upper Palaeozoic sand reservoir of Ordos Basin. Acta Pet. Sin. 2003, 24, 40–43, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu, C.Y.; Zheng, H.R.; Hu, Z.Q. Characteristics of carbonate cementation in clastic rocks from the Chang 6 sandbody of Yanchang Formation, southern Ordos Basin. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2012, 55, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, B.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of the Permian Xiazijie Formation in Wuerhe area, Junggar Basin. Lithol. Reserv. 2015, 27, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wei, W.; Zhu, X.M.; Guo, D.B. Carbonate cements in Lower Cretaceous Bayingebi sandstone reservoirs in Chagan Sag, Yin-e Basin: Formation phases and formation mechanisms. Geochimica 2015, 44, 590–599, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  82. Flügel, E. Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 267–334. [Google Scholar]
  83. Saller, A.H.; Henderson, N. Distribution of Porosity and Permeability in Platform Dolomites: Insight from the Permian of West Texas: Reply. AAPG Bull. 2001, 82, 1528–1550. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sun, S.Q. Dolomite reservoirs: Porosity evolution and reservoir characteristics. AAPG Bull. 1995, 79, 186–204. [Google Scholar]
  85. Jiang, L.; Cai, C.; Worden, R.H.; Crowley, S.F.; Jia, L.; Zhang, K.; Duncan, I.J. Multiphase dolomitization of deeply buried Cambrian petroleum reservoirs, Tarim Basin, north–west China. Sedimentology 2016, 63, 2130–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map showing the structure of the study area and a lithological section of the Shahejie Formation.
Figure 1. Map showing the structure of the study area and a lithological section of the Shahejie Formation.
Minerals 09 00013 g001
Figure 2. Optical thin sections and SEM images showing (a) crystalline coating dolomite (CD) wrapped around bioclastic grains in the form of isopachous cement and pore-filling dolomite (FD) in intergranular pores; (b) CD that clearly covers the surface of a peloid (energy spectroscopy: Mg: 3.67%, Ca: 5.13%, O: 49.68%); (c) Pore-lining dolomite (LD) developed around a moldic pore; (d) thin microcrystalline pore-lining dolomite (LD) that developed around various bioclasts (energy spectroscopy: Mg: 7.15%, Ca: 8.65%, O: 58.58%); (e) blade pore-lining dolomite (red arrow) with an isopachous rim that grew around intergranular pores, pendant pore-lining dolomite (yellow arrow) that is characterized by a distinct thickening of cement crusts beneath grains or under the roofs of intergranular and solution voids, and FD in intergranular pores; and (f) pore-filling dolomite (FD) in a moldic pore.
Figure 2. Optical thin sections and SEM images showing (a) crystalline coating dolomite (CD) wrapped around bioclastic grains in the form of isopachous cement and pore-filling dolomite (FD) in intergranular pores; (b) CD that clearly covers the surface of a peloid (energy spectroscopy: Mg: 3.67%, Ca: 5.13%, O: 49.68%); (c) Pore-lining dolomite (LD) developed around a moldic pore; (d) thin microcrystalline pore-lining dolomite (LD) that developed around various bioclasts (energy spectroscopy: Mg: 7.15%, Ca: 8.65%, O: 58.58%); (e) blade pore-lining dolomite (red arrow) with an isopachous rim that grew around intergranular pores, pendant pore-lining dolomite (yellow arrow) that is characterized by a distinct thickening of cement crusts beneath grains or under the roofs of intergranular and solution voids, and FD in intergranular pores; and (f) pore-filling dolomite (FD) in a moldic pore.
Minerals 09 00013 g002
Figure 3. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of authigenic dolomite in E2s: (a) thin isopachous microcrystalline coating dolomite (CD); (b) CL image of a, in which the CD exhibits faint–moderately dull red-orange red luminescence; (c) multigeneration interparticle pore-lining dolomite (LD) that developed in pellicular oolites; (d) CL image of c, in which the first-generation fine columnar dolomite exhibits bright orange luminescence (LD-1), the second-generation granular dolomite with a zonal structure exhibits bright red light (LD-2), and the third-generation granular dolomite exhibits dull red light (LD-3); (e) interparticle pore-filling dolomite (FD) filling a moldic cavity; and (f) CL image of e, in which the FD exhibits moderately bright orange luminescence; (g) oolitic dolomite (OD) with multiple concentric layers; and (h) CL image of g, in which the various cortical laminae of oolites have different degrees of cathodoluminescence.
Figure 3. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of authigenic dolomite in E2s: (a) thin isopachous microcrystalline coating dolomite (CD); (b) CL image of a, in which the CD exhibits faint–moderately dull red-orange red luminescence; (c) multigeneration interparticle pore-lining dolomite (LD) that developed in pellicular oolites; (d) CL image of c, in which the first-generation fine columnar dolomite exhibits bright orange luminescence (LD-1), the second-generation granular dolomite with a zonal structure exhibits bright red light (LD-2), and the third-generation granular dolomite exhibits dull red light (LD-3); (e) interparticle pore-filling dolomite (FD) filling a moldic cavity; and (f) CL image of e, in which the FD exhibits moderately bright orange luminescence; (g) oolitic dolomite (OD) with multiple concentric layers; and (h) CL image of g, in which the various cortical laminae of oolites have different degrees of cathodoluminescence.
Minerals 09 00013 g003
Figure 4. Optical backscattered electron microscope images of different types of dolomite: (a) microcrystalline coating dolomite (a-6, a-7) and crystalline dolomite on the inner wall of moldic pores (a-8, a-9); (b) pore-filling dolomite filling the moldic pores (b-1, b-2) and pore-lining dolomite developed around the residual intergranular primary pore (b-7, b-8); (c) microcrystalline coating dolomite wrapped around bioclastic grains (c-1, c-2); (d) crystalline dolomite on the inner wall of moldic pores (d-1); (e) pore-filling dolomite filling the residual intergranular primary pores (e-1) and pore-lining dolomite developed around the pore (e-2); (f) various cortical laminae of oolites (see analytical data in Table 3).
Figure 4. Optical backscattered electron microscope images of different types of dolomite: (a) microcrystalline coating dolomite (a-6, a-7) and crystalline dolomite on the inner wall of moldic pores (a-8, a-9); (b) pore-filling dolomite filling the moldic pores (b-1, b-2) and pore-lining dolomite developed around the residual intergranular primary pore (b-7, b-8); (c) microcrystalline coating dolomite wrapped around bioclastic grains (c-1, c-2); (d) crystalline dolomite on the inner wall of moldic pores (d-1); (e) pore-filling dolomite filling the residual intergranular primary pores (e-1) and pore-lining dolomite developed around the pore (e-2); (f) various cortical laminae of oolites (see analytical data in Table 3).
Minerals 09 00013 g004
Figure 5. Carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of different types of dolomite and sedimentary environments of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Shijiutuo area, Bohai area [17,55,56].
Figure 5. Carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of different types of dolomite and sedimentary environments of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Shijiutuo area, Bohai area [17,55,56].
Minerals 09 00013 g005
Figure 6. MgO and FeO contents in different circular layers of oolites.
Figure 6. MgO and FeO contents in different circular layers of oolites.
Minerals 09 00013 g006
Figure 7. Origin of dolomite showing that with the consumption of Mg2+, the microcrystalline coating dolomite and the early lining dolomite precipitate formed. If sufficient Mg2+ remained in the diagenetic fluid, pore-filling dolomite or late lining dolomite will be formed.
Figure 7. Origin of dolomite showing that with the consumption of Mg2+, the microcrystalline coating dolomite and the early lining dolomite precipitate formed. If sufficient Mg2+ remained in the diagenetic fluid, pore-filling dolomite or late lining dolomite will be formed.
Minerals 09 00013 g007
Table 1. Carbon and oxygen isotope data of different types of dolomite.
Table 1. Carbon and oxygen isotope data of different types of dolomite.
WellDepthTypeδ13CPDBδ18OPDBPaleo TemperatureSalinity IndexSalinity
(m)(‰)(‰)(°C)ZS
Q33376.5CD0.32−5.82124.3125.1 28.9
Q23762.6CD5.69−0.9788.4138.5 33.8
Q33382.1LD4.7−0.7687136.5 34.0
Q33375.06LD1.88−4.01110.4129.2 30.7
Q33375.65LD−0.42−9.35153.4121.8 25.4
Q23762.6LD5.41−3.99110.2136.4 30.8
Q33378.92FD0.56−2.2797.6127.3 32.5
Q33377.34FD1.78−2.8101.4129.6 32.0
Q33380.25FD2.02−4.97117.7129.0 29.8
Q33341.25FD2.67−6.36128.6129.6 28.4
Q33376.65FD0.65−5.64122.9125.8 29.1
Q33375.06FD0.15−6.24127.7124.5 28.5
Q33341.78FD2.67−6.36128.6129.6 28.4
Q33382.1FD−0.51−8.73148.1121.9 26.0
Q33384.9FD0.53−9.34153.3123.7 25.4
Q23762.6FD4−3.16104.1133.9 31.6
Table 2. Macroelemental compositions of mudstone in E2s.
Table 2. Macroelemental compositions of mudstone in E2s.
WellDepthSiO2Al2O3CaOMgOFe2O3K2ONa2OMg2+/Ca2+
%%%%%%%Molar
Q53224.959.7217.580.7822.375.763.891.884.24
Q5291561.3215.40.7382.076.483.251.853.93
Q5294560.0215.441.931.786.193.211.91.29
Q5300557.2616.510.86726.993.331.913.23
Q5304556.2316.80.7142.057.343.191.734.02
Q5309557.216.680.72326.684.031.363.87
Q5313555.116.520.6082.027.194.381.554.65
Q5317552.9315.561.5127.734.681.671.85
Q5331560.5114.392.521.744.794.43.110.97
Q5334554.4213.174.382.825.084.392.480.90
Q5340540.2410.1214.71.952.960.7830.18
Q5344051.6611.045.381.725.433.581.230.45
Q43452.462.2715.620.82.155.044.630.6343.76
Q43452.560.7515.221.142.056.294.650.582.52
Q43452.859.7315.081.42.226.564.260.6252.22
Q43453.361.8315.242.512.0143.40.5711.12
Q43453.467.916.130.8720.9682.183.780.891.55
Q43453.773.5311.222.041.011.923.730.5410.69
Q43454.964.7811.134.452.213.313.490.4330.70
Q43455.765.6612.573.21.733.993.50.4920.76
Q1342562.9213.261.260.6354.249.110.9440.71
Q1314554.2316.920.8532.187.074.121.433.58
Q1319554.4916.410.6052.096.994.151.634.84
Q1325050.1214.626.082.026.563.381.240.47
Q1338556.7111.885.53.513.695.780.8430.89
Q1359043.0313.22.244.6812.133.691.582.93
Q1365056.513.061.511.85.314.211.331.67
Q1368057.9713.52.462.196.364.181.221.25
Table 3. Results of the geochemical analyses of different occurrences of dolomite.
Table 3. Results of the geochemical analyses of different occurrences of dolomite.
WellDepthPhotoPoint TypeNa2OSiO2MnOMgOSrOFeOK2OCoOCaOBaOTotalMgO/CaO
(m)No.No.%%%%%%%%%%Molar
Q23779.2aa-2OD0.0430.0640.12621.4050.2051.0190035.0040.02257.89 0.86
Q23779.2aa-3OD0.1210.240.13420.6810.0480.9050.0450.0335.0050.00557.21 0.83
Q23779.2aa-4OD0.1330.4420.5120.2810.0971.0960.0330.0534.813-57.45 0.82
Q23779.2aa-5OD0.1420.1110.16521.5040.1350.8230.017-31.8530.07154.82 0.95
Q23779.2aa-6OD0.1010.4230.12918.7090.0794.6850.0220.03533.7150.07957.98 0.78
Q23762.6bb-6CD0.1280.2361.03921.1280.1230.8390.044-34.4940.07958.11 0.86
Q23762.6bb-7CD0.1420.160.67720.4560.1710.6630.0270.00534.2950.06156.66 0.84
Q23779.2cc-1CD0.1331.1050.17518.7990.1271.6360.0750.04132.8870.02955.01 0.80
Q23779.2cc-2CD0.1290.0550.05519.30.1374.090.021-34.9840.03658.81 0.77
Q23762.6ee-2LD0.1520.0190.04621.8370.235-0.017-32.002-54.31 0.96
Q23762.6bb-8LD0.1380.017-23.5020.212-0.006-31.6740.01355.56 1.04
Q23762.6bb-9LD0.0860.001-22.1640.1610.1630.0160.05232.2910.07255.01 0.96
Q23762.6ff-7LD0.09-0.14321.320.1050.7580.0050.01934.9460.05457.44 0.85
Q23762.6ff-8LD0.1260.1190.34322.1830.1210.6810.0280.01533.0140.04856.68 0.94
Q23779.2dd-1LD0.0940.033-21.2370.1020.3640.0220.03227.6440.04749.58 1.08
Q23762.6ee-1FD0.1230.017-19.5930.0480.0310.0110.05230.4740.0350.38 0.90
Q23762.6ff-1FD0.1330.0191.64321.0890.1120.8770.02-33.1890.0457.12 0.89
Q23762.6ff-2FD0.1050.0160.17919.1370.0950.414--33.9310.01453.89 0.79
Note: OD = dolomite in circular oolitic layers; CD = coating dolomite; LD = pore-lining dolomite; FD = pore-filling dolomite.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, H.; Lv, Z.; Shen, Z.; Xiong, C. Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Saline Lacustrine Dolomite Cements and Its Palaeoenvironmental Significance: A Case Study of Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Bohai Sea. Minerals 2019, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010013

AMA Style

Meng H, Lv Z, Shen Z, Xiong C. Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Saline Lacustrine Dolomite Cements and Its Palaeoenvironmental Significance: A Case Study of Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Bohai Sea. Minerals. 2019; 9(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Hailong, Zhengxiang Lv, Zhongmin Shen, and Chenhao Xiong. 2019. "Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Saline Lacustrine Dolomite Cements and Its Palaeoenvironmental Significance: A Case Study of Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Bohai Sea" Minerals 9, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010013

APA Style

Meng, H., Lv, Z., Shen, Z., & Xiong, C. (2019). Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Saline Lacustrine Dolomite Cements and Its Palaeoenvironmental Significance: A Case Study of Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Bohai Sea. Minerals, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop