Next Article in Journal
Distribution, Vertical Transmission, and Cooperative Mechanisms of Obligate Symbiotic Bacteria in the Leafhopper Maiestas dorsalis (Hemiptera, Cicadellidea)
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Diet Production System for Conopomorpha cramerella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), a Major Cocoa Production Pest in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/insects14080709
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MicroRNA miR-274-5p Suppresses Found-in-Neurons Associated with Melanotic Mass Formation and Developmental Growth in Drosophila

by
Hee Kyung Kim
,
Chae Jeong Kim
,
Daegyu Jang
and
Do-Hwan Lim
*
School of Systems Biomedical Science, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(8), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080709
Submission received: 14 July 2023 / Revised: 7 August 2023 / Accepted: 13 August 2023 / Published: 14 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Molecular Biology and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In animals, including humans and flies, blood cells play crucial roles in various biological processes, such as immune response and normal development. The abnormal regulation of hematopoiesis in flies results in the formation of melanotic masses, which are also known as melanotic tumors. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying this process are not fully understood. In this study, we found that the upregulation of miR-274-5p, a small non-coding RNA, activates the JNK and JAK/STAT signaling pathways by suppressing the expression of found-in-neurons (fne) encoding an RNA-binding protein in flies. This regulation controls the formation of melanotic masses and developmental growth. Overall, our findings provide valuable insights into melanotic mass formation and developmental growth as well as the regulatory network of the JNK and JAK/STAT signaling pathways.

Abstract

The hematopoietic system plays a crucial role in immune defense response and normal development, and it is regulated by various factors from other tissues. The dysregulation of hematopoiesis is associated with melanotic mass formation; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying this process are poorly understood. Here, we observed that the overexpression of miR-274 in the fat body resulted in the formation of melanotic masses. Moreover, abnormal activation of the JNK and JAK/STAT signaling pathways was linked to these consequences. In addition to this defect, miR-274 overexpression in the larval fat body decreased the total tissue size, leading to a reduction in body weight. miR-274-5p was found to directly suppress the expression of found-in-neurons (fne), which encodes an RNA-binding protein. Similar to the effects of miR-274 overexpression, fne depletion led to melanotic mass formation and growth reduction. Collectively, miR-274 plays a regulatory role in the fne–JNK signaling axis in melanotic mass formation and growth control.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Blood cells play important roles in the immune response against invading pathogens and in the normal development of metazoan [1,2]. In Drosophila, hematopoiesis occurs in two different waves: in the head mesoderm of early embryos and the lymph glands of larvae [3,4,5]. During this process, Drosophila prohemocytes terminally differentiate into three types of blood cells: plasmatocytes (phagocytosis), crystal cells (melanization), and lamellocytes (encapsulation) [2,5]. Phagocytic plasmatocytes engulf apoptotic bodies and pathogens, such as bacteria and fungi, as the predominant hemocytes [6,7]. Lamellocytes, which are rare in healthy conditions, can massively differentiate after infection and form a capsule around foreign pathogens [2,8]. Melanization is facilitated by crystal cells that secrete phenol oxidase [8]. This hemocyte-mediated cellular immune response is involved in the formation of larval melanotic masses.
In Drosophila, melanotic mass formation, a conspicuous cellular response, can be induced via abnormal immune responses, such as lymph gland overgrowth and the massive differentiation of lamellocytes [2,9]. The formation of melanotic masses is closely linked to several signaling pathways, including the Toll, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), Drosophila immune deficiency (IMD)/Relish, and Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (Ras/MAPK) pathways [8]. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is associated with innate immunity and hematopoiesis. According to a model of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in Drosophila, binding of the cytokine, Unpaired (Upd), to the Domeless (Dome) receptor induces receptor dimerization and activation of the JAK Hopscotch (Hop in Drosophila). Activated Hops phosphorylate STAT proteins, allowing them to form dimers and translocate into the nucleus to regulate the expression of target genes, such as the Suppressor of cytokine signaling at 36E (Scocs36E) [10]. Loss of JAK/STAT signaling leads to impaired encapsulation, whereas aberrant activation of the JAK/STAT pathway results in premature lamellocyte differentiation and melanotic mass formation [10]. The activation of c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) signaling can affect the JAK/STAT signaling pathway by inducing the expression of Upds, which is a ligand of the JAK/STAT pathway [11]. These circulating Upds can also be released from other larval tissues, including the fat body and injured tissues, triggering the activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in the target tissues [10,11]. This occurs through an amplification loop that mutually activates the JAK/STAT signaling in each tissue [10,11]. Furthermore, these processes can affect hemocytes [11]. However, the regulation of hematopoiesis associated with melanotic mass formation is still poorly understood.
Drosophila undergoes growth until a distinct stage, known as the larval-to-pupal transition, which is triggered by the ecdysone steroid hormone. The final body size of Drosophila is influenced by the growth rate during this stage and the duration of growth [12]. Under these conditions, the size and number of cells composing individual tissues ultimately determine the final size [12]. These growth conditions are intricately regulated by complex networks of internal cues, such as hormones and signaling pathways, as well as external factors like nutrition. For instance, the downregulation of slimfast (slif), which encodes an amino acid transporter, leads to a growth defect through the target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling pathway [13]. However, the complete regulatory networks controlling growth remain incompletely understood.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs (~21 nucleotides in length) that post-transcriptionally suppress gene expression by inducing RNA degradation and/or translational repression [14]. After transcription from the genome, primary miRNAs are cleaved into precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) by the Drosha protein [15]. Subsequently, the pre-miRNAs are processed into miRNA duplexes by the Dicer protein [16]. Depending on whether it is derived from the 5′ or 3′ arm of the stem region in the pre-miRNA, each strand of the miRNA duplex is presented with a −5p or −3p suffix, respectively [17]. One strand of the miRNA duplexes is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex containing the Argonaute protein, regulating the expression of target mRNAs by binding to their 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTR) [18]. Using high-throughput sequencing, a large number of miRNAs have been identified across species, including humans, mice, and flies. According to the miRbase, 469 mature miRNAs have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster [19]. Individual miRNAs have been estimated to target approximately 200 mRNA transcripts on average [20]. Through these complicated regulatory integrations, miRNAs are involved in various biological processes including development, growth, metabolism, and cell death [20]. In particular, as an miRNA linked to the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, Drosophila miR-279 is involved in ovarian cell fate and circadian behavior by regulating stat92E and upd, respectively [21,22]. Additionally, miR-306 and miR-79 enhance the activation of JNK signaling by suppressing RNF146, which is an E3 ubiquitin ligase [23]. However, researchers have revealed the roles of only some miRNAs in the signaling pathways controlling various biological processes, and the biological functions of most miRNAs still need to be explored. The found-in-neurons (fne) gene encodes an RNA-binding protein as one of the three paralogs (Rbp9, Fne, and Elav) of the ELAV gene family, and it is primarily expressed in neuronal tissues in Drosophila [24]. According to previous reports, fne is associated with several biological processes, such as mushroom body development, male courtship performance, and synaptic plasticity [24,25]. In addition, similar to other family proteins, Fne broadly induces 3′-UTR extension in neuronal cells by blocking the use of the proximal polyadenylation site [26]. The cytoplasmic protein, Fne, undergoes a switch of cellular localization toward the nucleus due to the inclusion of a microexon encoding a nuclear localization signal under Elav-nonfunctional conditions [26]. However, functional studies on Fne have focused on its role in primarily expressed neuronal cells. As a result, other biological roles of fne in non-neuronal cells remain unknown.
In Drosophila, glia-derived miR-274 is known to play a role in regulating the growth of synaptic boutons and tracheal branches through the targeting of Sprouty [27]. Furthermore, miR-274 is known to be upregulated in Drosophila under pathogen bacteria, Micrococcus luteus infection conditions [28]. However, the biological functions of miR-274 in other contexts and under these upregulated conditions remain unclear. In the present study, we investigated the biological role of Drosophila miR-274 in larval fat bodies in terms of melanotic mass formation and developmental growth. We found that miR-274 overexpression results in the activation of the JNK and JAK/STAT signaling pathways, which are closely associated with the observed phenotypic consequences. Furthermore, we revealed that this regulation of miR-274 was mediated by the RNA-binding protein Fne, which is a biologically relevant target of miR-274. Overall, our findings suggest that miR-274 plays a crucial role in regulating the fne–JNK signaling axis under its upregulated conditions, which in turn affects melanotic mass formation and developmental growth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Drosophila Strains

All flies were grown at 25 °C on standard cornmeal/agar medium under noncrowded conditions. Transgenic overexpression studies were performed using the GAL4/UAS system. The following fly lines from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center were used: w1118 (BL5905), Cg-GAL4 (BL7011), ppl-GAL4 (BL58768), UAS-LUC-miR-274 (BL41172), and UAS-fne-RNAiTRiP (BL28784).

2.2. Analysis of Melanotic Mass

All larvae and flies were maintained on standard cornmeal/agar media. Melanotic masses were analyzed in wandering third-instar larvae and adult flies as previously described [29]. For quantitative analysis, the percentage of wandering third-instar larvae with melanotic masses was determined using three vials per genotype. Representative images of wandering third-instar larvae or adult flies were captured using a stereomicroscope (Olympus, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Determination of the Eclosion Rate

After the eggs were laid on standard cornmeal/agar media at 25 °C, three vials containing eggs from each genotype were transferred to a 29 °C incubator. More than 130 pupae were analyzed for each genotype at 15 d AEL, and the rate of empty puparia in each vial was calculated to determine the eclosion rate.

2.4. RNA Isolation and Determination of RNA Transcript Level

Total RNA was purified from S2 cells, larval fat bodies, and adult heads using the TRI Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. TRI Reagent BD (Molecular Research Center) was used for RNA isolation from larval hemocytes. The following protocol was used for each sample: S2 cells were harvested via centrifugation for 5 min at 350× g. Fat bodies were dissected in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) from wandering third-instar larvae in cold PBS. To collect hemolymph-containing hemocytes, we used a previously described protocol with some modifications [30]. Briefly, after washing the larvae with distilled water, individual larvae were transferred to cold PBS, and the cuticle was gently torn away to allow the hemolymph to bleed out. Hemolymph was then collected in a new tube.
miRNA quantification was performed using a PCR-based method, as previously described [31]. In brief, polyadenine was added to the 3′-end of RNAs using E. coli poly(A) polymerase (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Republic of Korea), and the polyadenylated RNAs were reverse-transcribed using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Enzynomics) and an miR-RT-adapter-primer (Supplementary Table S1). To measure the mRNA transcript levels, RNA was first treated with DNase I (Enzynomics) to remove genomic DNA contaminants. RNA was then reverse-transcribed using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase and random hexamers (Enzynomics). Quantitative PCR was performed using a BioFACT Real-Time PCR Master Mix (BIOFACT, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). To detect the isoforms of fne transcripts, RT-PCR was performed using a MegaFi Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix (Applied Biological Materials, Richmond, BC, Canada) or BioFACTTM 2× Taq PCR Master Mix (BIOFACT). PCR products were loaded into 2.5% agarose gel and then stained using SYBRTM Safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The band images were captured on a blue light transilluminator (miniPCR, Cambridge, MA, USA). The primer sequences used for semi- or quantitative-RT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.5. Western Blotting

Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [32]. The following primer antibodies were used: anti-phospho-JNK (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and anti-β-Tubulin (1:5000; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA). Chemiluminescence signals were detected using FluorChem HD2 (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA), and band intensities were quantified using ImageJ [33].

2.6. Body Weight and Wing Analysis

Groups of 8–10 adult flies of each genotype (3–5 days old) were transferred to new 1.5 mL tubes and weighed using an analytical balance (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA). Four biological replicates per genotype and sex were analyzed.
The left wings of adult female (5 days old) were used for wing analysis. After capturing images using a stereomicroscope (Olympus), the relative wing size was measured using ImageJ software version 1.53 [33]. The wing cell size was analyzed as previously described [34]. The average wing cell size was calculated by dividing the specific wing area by the number of cells in that area. The total cell number of wings was estimated by calculating the wing size and total wing cell number.

2.7. Analysis of the Fat Body

To capture an image of the whole larval fat body, the fat body was dissected from five wandering third-instar larvae of each genotype and photographed using a stereomicroscope (Olympus).
Phalloidin staining was performed as previously described [35]. Briefly, fat bodies were dissected from wandering third-instar larvae and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) in cold PBS for 20 min. After washing with cold PBS, fixed larval fat bodies were stained with Alexa Fluor 568-phalloidin (1:200; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) or Phalloidin-iFluor 488 (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The stained samples were placed in a mounting medium containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Abcam), and images were captured using a confocal laser microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The relative size of the phalloidin-stained cells was measured using ImageJ software version 1.53 [33].

2.8. Cell Culture

Drosophila S2 cells were maintained at 25 °C in Schneider’s insect medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Welgene, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea) and 100 U/mL penicillin–streptomycin (Welgene).

2.9. Luciferase Reporter Assay

To generate plasmid constructs for the reporter assay, the genomic region of the fne 3′-UTR was amplified by PCR. The amplified DNA fragment was then inserted downstream of the Renilla luciferase in the psiCHECK-2 vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). For the mutant form of the fne 3′-UTR, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as previously described [36]. To generate the miR-274-overexpressing construct, a DNA fragment containing pre-miR-274 was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pMT/V5-His A vector (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Both the miRNA-expressing and luciferase reporter constructs were co-transfected using TransIT®-Insect Transfection Reagent (Mirus Bio, Madison, WI, USA). The activities of Renilla and firefly luciferase were determined using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) 48 h after miR-274 expression. The Renilla luciferase activity was normalized to the firefly luciferase activity. All primer sets for the reporter assay are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

3. Results

3.1. miR-274 Is Associated with Melanotic Mass Formation through the JNK—JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Axis

The expression of miR-274 exhibits dynamic changes during Drosophila development [32], and it is also upregulated under pathogen bacteria infection conditions [28]. Thus, we sought to investigate the biological roles of miR-274 under these upregulated conditions. To specially determine the biological roles of miR-274 in the fat bodies of Drosophila, we employed Cg-GAL4 to overexpress miR-274 (hereafter, Cg>miR-274). Cg-GAL4 is known to be active in fat bodies [37], where miR-274 is endogenously expressed (Supplementary Figure S1A). In the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae, the expression of miR-274-5p, the major strand of miR-274, was significantly upregulated (Figure 1A). However, there was no significant increase in the expression level of miR-274-3p compared to the control (Supplementary Figure S1B). Interestingly, ninety-four percent of the Cg>miR-274 larvae exhibited black masses throughout their bodies, whereas the Cg/+ control larvae did not exhibit such melanotic masses (Figure 1B). The Cg>miR-274 larvae had varying numbers and sizes of melanotic masses throughout their bodies (Figure 1C). These black masses persisted in the abdomens of both male and female flies (Figure 1D). In addition, we observed the formation of melanotic masses in the larvae when miR-274 was overexpressed using another fat body-specific GAL4 driver, ppl-GAL4 (Supplementary Figure S1C). Taken together, these results suggest that miR-274 is associated with the formation of melanotic masses.
We proceeded to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying melanotic mass formation. According to previous reports, melanotic mass formation is strongly associated with the JAK/STAT signaling pathway [10]. Therefore, we sought to determine whether the overexpression of miR-274 could alter the activity of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. First, we measured the expression of socs36E mRNA, a target gene of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway [10,38], in the larval fat body of Cg>miR-274. Indeed, socs36E mRNA transcripts were significantly upregulated in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae compared to that in the control larval fat body (Figure 1E). These results suggest that the overexpression of miR-274 leads to the activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in the fat body.
Next, we wondered how miR-274 could affect the JAK/STAT signal pathway. Thus, we determined the mRNA transcript levels of upds, a ligand of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway [39,40], in the larval fat body of Cg>miR-274. Interestingly, we found a significant upregulation of upd3 mRNA transcripts in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae, with an approximately 30.4-fold increase compared to that in the controls (Figure 1F). In contrast, the expression of upd2 was downregulated with a relatively smaller change of approximately 4.0-fold in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae compared to that in the controls (Figure 1G). Furthermore, no expression of upd1 was detected in the fat body. These data indicate that the overexpression of miR-274 leads to a significant upregulation of upd3, which activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.
The expression of the upd3 cytokine is induced by the JNK signaling pathway [11]. Thus, to examine whether miR-274 is linked to the activation of the JNK signaling pathway, we determined the level of active phospho-JNK (p-JNK) in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. The p-JNK level was found to increase in the larval fat body of Cg>miR-274 relative to that in the control fat body (Figure 1H, Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting that miR-274 overexpression also activates the JNK signaling pathway.
Activation of the JNK signaling pathway in other tissues can upregulate the expression of upd3, which triggers a systemic response in hemocytes. This response can increase hemocyte proliferation and lamellocyte differentiation, ultimately resulting in melanotic mass formation [10,11]. Therefore, to investigate whether the population of lamellocytes, which are closely associated with melanotic mass, is increased in the hemolymph of Cg>miR-274 larvae, we determined the level of Integrin betanu subunit (Itgbn), which is a marker gene of lamellocytes [41] using RT-qPCR. Remarkably, the expression level of Itgbn was significantly higher in the hemocytes of Cg>miR-274 larvae than in the control (Figure 1I), suggesting that lamellocytes were more differentiated in the hemolymph of Cg>miR-274 larvae. Collectively, our data suggest that miR-274 is associated with melanotic mass formation by regulating the JNK-JAK/STAT pathway axis under its upregulated conditions.

3.2. Fat Body Overexpression of miR-274 Leads to Growth Reduction through Defects in the Fat Body

We additionally investigated the phenotypic consequences observed in the fat bodies of Cg>miR-274 larvae. Interestingly, the overall size of the fat bodies expressing miR-274 was markedly reduced compared to that of the control fat bodies (Figure 2A). Moreover, the size of cells in the fat body was notably reduced in Cg>miR-274 larvae compared to that in the control larvae (Figure 2B,C). These data indicate that the overexpression of miR-274 causes a reduction in the tissue growth of the larval fat body in addition to melanotic mass formation. Activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway is linked to the downregulation of Insulin-like receptor (InR) mRNA expression [42]. Because the JAK/STAT signaling activation was observed in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae, we sought to determine whether the expression of InR mRNA is changed in the fat body by miR-274 overexpression. As expected, the expression of InR mRNA was reduced in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae compared with the controls (Figure 2D), indicating that a reduced size of the fat body by miR-274 overexpression may be likely associated with a decrease in InR mRNA expression.
As the fat body is a crucial tissue associated with energy metabolism and growth [43], we continuously monitored the effects of miR-274 overexpression on developmental growth when miR-274 was overexpressed in the fat body. Most Cg>miR-274 larvae developed into the pupal stage; however, more than 50% of these pupae could not eclose into adult flies (Figure 2E), indicating that miR-274-induced defects in tissue growth of the larval fat body affect normal development.
Interestingly, the growth of Cg>miR-274 adult flies was reduced relative to that of control flies. To further explore this reduction in growth, we compared the body weights of 3–5-day-old flies between Cg/+ and Cg>miR-274. In both males and females, we observed a significant reduction in the body weight of Cg>miR-274 flies (8.1%–26.5%) compared to Cg/+ control flies (Figure 2F). Furthermore, in proportion to body weight, the size of Cg>miR-274 adult wings remarkably decreased relative to the size of control wings (Figure 2G,H). To determine whether the reduction in whole wing size was due to the size and/or number of wing cells, we analyzed the cell size and number of wings in the indicated genotypes. Both the cell size and number of wings of Cg>miR-274 flies were lower than those in the control flies (Figure 2I,J). Taken together, considering previous results of the upregulation of miR-274 at the larval-to-pupal transitions [32], these results indicate that the untimely upregulation of miR-274 results in the inhibition of growth through the reduction in total tissue mass in the fat body.

3.3. miR-274 Negatively Regulates the Expression of Fne

We wondered how miR-274 controls melanotic mass formation and growth and thus investigated the regulatory mechanism of miR-274. Using the miRNA target prediction tool, TargetScanFly [9], we first searched for potential target genes that could be regulated by miR-274-5p, which is the main strand of miR-274. We found 173 transcripts with conserved miR-274-5p binding sites (Supplementary Table S2). Among these, based on a screening study of the gene network regulating blood cell homeostasis in Drosophila [2], we selected found in neurons (fne) that encodes an RNA-binding protein associated with the regulation of mRNA processing, such as splicing and alternative polyadenylation (APA) of mRNA [26,44]. According to the prediction using TargetScanFly, miR-274-5p could be bound to two potential sites in the fne 3′-UTR: one conserved site (miR-274-5p BS1) and one poorly conserved site (miR-274-5p BS2) (Figure 3A, top).
In Drosophila, fne mRNAs are mainly expressed in the nervous system and exist as several isoforms with different lengths of the 3′-UTR [26]. Thus, we determined whether fne mRNA is also expressed in the larval fat body in addition to the nervous system. By semi-RT-qPCR using two different primer sets, we detected fne mRNA with a short and extended 3′-UTR in the fat body of wandering third-instar larvae and adult heads. Consistent with previous results [24,26], the fne mRNA transcript with an extended 3′-UTR was detected in adult heads and was also expressed in the fat body (Figure 3A, bottom; Supplementary Figure S2). Under Elav-depleted conditions, the nucleus-localized Fne (nFne) bearing the microexon can be induced, which regulates the APA process [26,44]. Therefore, we investigated whether nfne is expressed in the fat body, which is a tissue that does not express Elav. Interestingly, we found that only the nfne transcript containing the microexon was expressed in the larval fat bodies, whereas both general fne and nfne transcripts were expressed at high and low levels, respectively, in adult heads (Figure 3B, Supplementary Figure S2). These findings suggest that the APA-related nFne likely functions in the larval fat body.
We next examined whether miR-274 negatively regulates the expression of fne in larval fat bodies. Accordingly, we determined the levels of fne mRNA transcripts in the fat bodies of Cg/+ and Cg>miR-274 larvae. As expected, the expression of fne mRNA was significantly reduced in the larval fat bodies overexpressing miR-274 compared to that in the control fat bodies (Figure 3C). These data support the hypothesis that miR-274 suppresses fne mRNA expression in the larval fat bodies.
To clarify the regulatory interaction between miR-274 and fne mRNA, we performed a luciferase reporter assay. When miR-274 was overexpressed in S2 cells, the activity of Renilla luciferase (RL) fused with wild-type fne 3′-UTR significantly decreased (Figure 3D,E). In contrast, the inhibitory activity of miR-274 was partially reduced upon co-expression of RL fused with the fne 3′-UTR containing a mutation in the conserved miR-274-5p binding site (miR-274-5p BS1) (Figure 3E). Taken together, our results suggest that miR-274-5p directly suppresses fne expression in Drosophila.

3.4. Fne Is Involved in Melanotic Mass Formation as the Biological Target of miR-274

As fne is suppressed by miR-274 as a direct target in Drosophila, we sought to determine whether the loss of fne leads to phenotypic consequences similar to the defects caused by miR-274 driven by Cg-GAL4. The previous RNAi screening study reported that RNA splicing-associated protein fne may be associated with melanotic mass formation [2]. To test this, we first knocked down fne expression in the fat body using Cg-GAL4 (Cg>fne-RNAi) (Figure 4A). Consistent with the results for Cg>miR-274 larvae, we observed that melanotic masses remarkably appeared throughout the body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae (Figure 4B), and 42.3% of the Cg>fne-RNAi larvae exhibited melanotic mass formation (Figure 4C). Melanotic masses also persisted in both sexes into adulthood (Figure 4D). These findings suggest that the loss of fne is associated with melanotic mass formation.
We next examined whether the depletion of fne causes an increase in the activity of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in the larval fat body, similar to Cg>miR-274 larvae. The expression level of socs36E was significantly higher in the fat bodies of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae than in the control fat bodies (Figure 4E), indicating that the depletion of fne activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Furthermore, the expression of upd3 was markedly upregulated in the fat bodies of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae with an approximately 27.2-fold increase compared to that in the controls (Figure 4F). In contrast, the expression of upd2 was downregulated, with an approximately 2.9-fold decrease compared to that in the controls (Figure 4G). These results suggest that fne is involved in the activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway through a significant upregulation of upd3 expression rather than upd2 expression.
Furthermore, we determined whether fne alters the level of active p-JNK, as observed with miR-274 overexpression. The level of active p-JNK increased in the fat body of Cg> fne-RNAi larvae compared to that in the control (Figure 4H, Supplementary Figure S2), indicating that fne depletion activates the JNK signaling pathway.
We investigated whether the reduction in fne expression leads to increased lamellocyte differentiation. We determined the levels of Itgbn mRNA in the hemolymph of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. Consistent with Cg>miR-274 larvae, Itgbn mRNA levels were higher in the hemocytes of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae than in that of the controls (Figure 4I). Thus, the results imply that the depletion of fne causes an increase in the number of lamellocytes. Collectively, our data suggest that fne, as a biological target of miR-274, is associated with melanotic mass formation through the JNK–JAK/STAT signaling pathway.

3.5. Fne Depletion Leads to Growth Reduction

We investigated whether fne is also implicated in developmental growth, similar to miR-274. First, we analyzed the total fat body mass in Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. Similar to Cg>miR-274 larvae, the overall size of the fat body was remarkably reduced in Cg>fne-RNAi larvae compared to that in control larvae (Figure 5A). To further examine this phenotype, we compared the sizes of fat body cells between Cg/+ and Cg>fne-RNAi larvae after F-actin staining with phalloidin. The cell size of the fat body in Cg>fne-RNAi larvae was significantly smaller than that in the controls (Figure 5B,C). In addition, consistent with the observations from the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae, the expression of InR mRNA was significantly reduced in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae compared with the controls (Figure 5D). These results suggest that the reduced fat body resulting from fne depletion may be likely associated with a decrease in InR mRNA expression.
The eclosion rate of Cg>fne-RNAi pupae was remarkably reduced compared to that of control pupae (Figure 5E). To investigate whether defects in the larval fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi affected developmental growth, we measured the body weights of Cg>fne-RNAi flies. Consistent with the reduction in body weight in Cg>miR-274 flies, Cg>fne-RNAi flies of both sexes displayed significantly lower body weight than control flies (Figure 5F). Moreover, we observed a decrease in the whole size of Cg>fne-RNAi wings relative to control wings in proportion to body weight (Figure 5G,H). The size and the total number of wing cells in Cg>fne-RNAi flies were reduced compared to those in control flies (Figure 5I,J). Together, these observations indicate that fne, a target of miR-274, also plays a role in developmental growth.

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that miR-274 activates the JNK–JAK/STAT signaling axis by targeting fne, which in turn controls the formation of melanotic mass. However, further studies are needed to address the detailed mechanism by which fne controls the JNK–JAK/STAT signaling pathways. Based on previous reports [26], Fne may regulate gene expression through its involvement as an RNA-binding protein in the APA process. In particular, the nucleus-localized nFne is involved in this process under Elav-depleted conditions [26,44]. Based on our results, the nFne isoform is likely functional in the APA process in the larval fat body, where Elav is not expressed. Thus, the depletion of fne may induce a shortened 3′-UTR of fne-target mRNAs, thereby reducing the chance of negative regulation by miRNAs; this is because miRNAs mainly suppress the expression of target genes by binding to the 3′-UTR of mRNAs [14], which may result in an increase in the expression of genes targeted by Fne. By the targets of RNA-binding proteins identified by editing (TRIBE) method [45], target mRNAs directly bound by Fne have been identified in Drosophila S2 cells [46]. The identified genes include Stat92E, a key factor in the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, and positive regulators of JNK signaling, such as Cell division cycle 42 (Cdc42), Rac1, and cryptocephal (crc). Thus, changes in the length of the 3′-UTR of these genes involved in the JNK or the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, which are regulated by Fne, may alter their expression level.
Our findings indicate that miR-274 activates JNK signaling by suppressing fne, which in turn induces the expression of upd3 in the fat body. Subsequently, Upd3 derived from the fat body may stimulate lamellocyte differentiation, triggering melanotic mass formation. Although we provided evidence of the association between miR-274 overexpression in the fat body and melanotic mass formation based on observations using Cg- and ppl-GAL4 drivers, we cannot completely exclude the possibility that miR-274 may regulate the JNK–JAK/STAT signaling pathway in blood cells in addition to the fat body. The Cg-GAL4 driver primarily activates the fat body but also drives gene expression in blood cells. [37]. Furthermore, the effects of miR-274 on melanotic mass formation were relatively weaker in ppl>miR-274 larvae compared to Cg>miR-274 larvae. Thus, interactions between the regulatory networks of the fat body and hemocytes may synergistically influence melanotic mass formation.
We noted a significant reduction in tissue size and activation of the JNK–JAK/STAT signaling pathway in the fat body when miR-274 and fne were overexpressed and depleted, respectively. In addition to JAK/STAT signaling, JNK signaling is well known to play a pro-apoptotic role in cell death and negatively regulates insulin/IGF-like signaling in both mammals and Drosophila [47,48]. The activation of JNK signaling has been demonstrated to cause defects in the normal growth and development of the wing and eye in Drosophila [49,50]. These findings provide support for the association between miR-274, fne, and developmental growth. In addition, a previous report described that knockdown of upd2 in the fat body, but not upd1 and upd3, leads to growth reduction by regulating the secretion of Drosophila insulin-like peptides in the insulin-producing cells [51]. Therefore, as observed in this study, the downregulation of upd2 in the fat body may affect growth reduction.
According to previous reports, the expression of pre-miR-274 is higher in the glia than in other tissues during the larval stage of Drosophila [27]. However, mature-miR-274 is released as an exosome and broadly distributed to other cells, including synaptic boutons, muscle cells, and tracheal cells [27]. This finding implies that glia-derived exosomal mature-miR-274 could circulate in the larval hemolymph and affect the expression of its target genes in several target tissues, such as hemocytes and fat bodies, along with miR-274 transcribed in the tissue itself. The biological target gene of miR-274, fne, is primarily expressed in neuronal tissue in Drosophila [24]. The expression of both miR-274 and fne in the same tissues indicates that they are likely to maintain a regulatory network, which is similar to our findings in fat bodies. Based on our previous results, the expression of miR-274 is upregulated during the larval-to-pupal transition [32], which suggests that changes in miR-274 expression may alter the composition of the extended 3′-UTR of neuronal-specific genes by regulating the expression of fne during this developmental stage. Thus, future studies should investigate the perturbation of APA in neuron-specific genes during metamorphosis.
We observed a reduction in both fne mRNA and reporter activity with the fne 3′-UTR when miR-274 was overexpressed. miR-274-5p was found to negatively regulate the expression of fne at the transcript level by binding to at least one conserved site (miR-274-5p BS1) in the 3′-UTR of fne mRNA. However, the luciferase reporter activity suppressed by miR-274 was found to be partially restored when the region corresponding to the miR-274-5p seed was mutated in the miR-274-5p BS1. This result implies that other binding sites may exist for miR-274-5p in the fne 3′-UTR. The poorly conserved binding site (miR-274-5p BS2) in the fne 3′-UTR could be a potential regulatory binding site for miR-274-5p. Future studies could examine whether miR-274-5p targets miR-274-5p BS2 in the fne 3′-UTR.
A relatively stronger formation of melanotic masses was observed in larvae overexpressing miR-274 than in fne-depleted larvae. Most Cg>miR-274 larvae exhibited a melanotic mass, whereas less than 50% of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae had black dots. The melanotic masses in the individual Cg>miR-274 larvae were numerous and larger than those in the Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. Such small differences between the lines linked in the regulatory network may arise from other genes affected by alterations in miR-274 or fne expression. TargetScanFly identified 173 potential miR-274-5p targets. Some of these targets, such as S-adenosylmethionine Synthetase (Sam-S) and slimfast (slif), might directly or indirectly affect the JNK and/or JAK/STAT signaling pathways. In addition, although miR-274-3p is not the predominant strand of miR-274, miR-274-3p might contribute to melanotic mass formation and/or growth. TargetScanFly identified numerous potential target genes of miR-274-3p. For example, GO term analysis using DAVID [52,53] revealed 11 genes (Connector of kinase to AP-1, Menin 1, Protein phosphatase V, Ras-like protein A, Striatin interacting protein, alphabet, capping protein alpha, fiery mountain, flapwing, icarus, and pebbled) that can play negative regulators of the JNK signaling pathway.
Collectively, our findings provide insights into the potential molecular mechanisms underlying these phenomena. Further studies should explore these mechanisms in detail to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the physiological processes.

5. Conclusions

In this study, under its overexpression conditions, Drosophila miR-274 was found to play a regulatory role in the JNK and JAK/STAT signaling pathways by suppressing the expression of fne encoding an RNA-binding protein that functions in RNA processing, such as APA and alternative splicing. This regulatory network of miR-274–fne–JNK signaling in the larval fat body is associated with the formation of melanotic mass and developmental growth. Thus, our findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying melanotic mass formation and growth. Furthermore, a better understanding of this regulatory mechanism will contribute to the development of novel ideas for regulating immune defense responses against invading pathogens and growth regulation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14080709/s1. Supplementary Table S1: Sequences of oligonucleotides used in this study. Supplementary Table S2: Potential target genes predicted using TargetScanFly. Supplementary Figure S1: Expression of miR-274, and the formation of melanotic masses in ppl>miR-274 larvae. Supplementary Figure S2: Images of Western blotting and DNA gel presented in the main figures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.K.K. and D.-H.L.; Methodology, H.K.K. and D.-H.L.; Software, H.K.K. and D.-H.L.; Validation, H.K.K. and D.-H.L.; Formal Analysis, H.K.K. and D.-H.L.; Investigation, H.K.K., C.J.K., D.J. and D.-H.L.; Data Curation, H.K.K. and D.-H.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, H.K.K. and D.-H.L.; Writing—Review and Editing, D.-H.L.; Visualization, D.-H.L.; Supervision, D.-H.L.; Project Administration, D.-H.L.; Funding Acquisition, D.-H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2021R1A6A1A10044154) and the Korean government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2021R1F1A1059864).

Data Availability Statement

Datasets are available upon request. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without any reservations.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) for providing the fly strains. We also thank Min-Seok Choi and Young Sik Lee at Korea University for their assistance with the fly experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hartenstein, V. Blood cells and blood cell development in the animal kingdom. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22, 677–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Avet-Rochex, A.; Boyer, K.; Polesello, C.; Gobert, V.; Osman, D.; Roch, F.; Auge, B.; Zanet, J.; Haenlin, M.; Waltzer, L. An in vivo RNA interference screen identifies gene networks controlling Drosophila melanogaster blood cell homeostasis. BMC Dev. Biol. 2010, 10, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lanot, R.; Zachary, D.; Holder, F.; Meister, M. Postembryonic hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 2001, 230, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tepass, U.; Fessler, L.I.; Aziz, A.; Hartenstein, V. Embryonic origin of hemocytes and their relationship to cell death in Drosophila. Development 1994, 120, 1829–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Crozatier, M.; Meister, M. Drosophila haematopoiesis. Cell Microbiol. 2007, 9, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kocks, C.; Cho, J.H.; Nehme, N.; Ulvila, J.; Pearson, A.M.; Meister, M.; Strom, C.; Conto, S.L.; Hetru, C.; Stuart, L.M.; et al. Eater, a transmembrane protein mediating phagocytosis of bacterial pathogens in Drosophila. Cell 2005, 123, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ramet, M.; Pearson, A.; Manfruelli, P.; Li, X.; Koziel, H.; Gobel, V.; Chung, E.; Krieger, M.; Ezekowitz, R.A. Drosophila scavenger receptor CI is a pattern recognition receptor for bacteria. Immunity 2001, 15, 1027–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Minakhina, S.; Steward, R. Melanotic mutants in Drosophila: Pathways and phenotypes. Genetics 2006, 174, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Agarwal, V.; Subtelny, A.O.; Thiru, P.; Ulitsky, I.; Bartel, D.P. Predicting microRNA targeting efficacy in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Myllymaki, H.; Ramet, M. JAK/STAT pathway in Drosophila immunity. Scand. J. Immunol. 2014, 79, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pastor-Pareja, J.C.; Wu, M.; Xu, T. An innate immune response of blood cells to tumors and tissue damage in Drosophila. Dis. Model. Mech. 2008, 1, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Boulan, L.; Milan, M.; Leopold, P. The Systemic Control of Growth. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a019117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Colombani, J.; Raisin, S.; Pantalacci, S.; Radimerski, T.; Montagne, J.; Leopold, P. A nutrient sensor mechanism controls Drosophila growth. Cell 2003, 114, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. He, L.; Hannon, G.J. MicroRNAs: Small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kadener, S.; Rodriguez, J.; Abruzzi, K.C.; Khodor, Y.L.; Sugino, K.; Marr, M.T., 2nd; Nelson, S.; Rosbash, M. Genome-wide identification of targets of the drosha-pasha/DGCR8 complex. RNA 2009, 15, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lee, Y.S.; Nakahara, K.; Pham, J.W.; Kim, K.; He, Z.; Sontheimer, E.J.; Carthew, R.W. Distinct roles for Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA silencing pathways. Cell 2004, 117, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hammond, S.M. Dicing and slicing: The core machinery of the RNA interference pathway. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 5822–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Filipowicz, W.; Bhattacharyya, S.N.; Sonenberg, N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: Are the answers in sight? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kozomara, A.; Birgaoanu, M.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: From microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D155–D162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Colaianni, D.; De Pitta, C. The Role of microRNAs in the Drosophila melanogaster Visual System. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 889677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luo, W.; Sehgal, A. Regulation of circadian behavioral output via a MicroRNA-JAK/STAT circuit. Cell 2012, 148, 765–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yoon, W.H.; Meinhardt, H.; Montell, D.J. miRNA-mediated feedback inhibition of JAK/STAT morphogen signalling establishes a cell fate threshold. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 1062–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, Z.; Xia, X.; Li, J.; Igaki, T. Tumor elimination by clustered microRNAs miR-306 and miR-79 via noncanonical activation of JNK signaling. eLife 2022, 11, e77340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zanini, D.; Jallon, J.M.; Rabinow, L.; Samson, M.L. Deletion of the Drosophila neuronal gene found in neurons disrupts brain anatomy and male courtship. Genes Brain Behav. 2012, 11, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zaharieva, E.; Haussmann, I.U.; Brauer, U.; Soller, M. Concentration and Localization of Coexpressed ELAV/Hu Proteins Control Specificity of mRNA Processing. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 35, 3104–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wei, L.; Lee, S.; Majumdar, S.; Zhang, B.; Sanfilippo, P.; Joseph, B.; Miura, P.; Soller, M.; Lai, E.C. Overlapping Activities of ELAV/Hu Family RNA Binding Proteins Specify the Extended Neuronal 3′ UTR Landscape in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 2020, 80, 140–155.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tsai, Y.W.; Sung, H.H.; Li, J.C.; Yeh, C.Y.; Chen, P.Y.; Cheng, Y.J.; Chen, C.H.; Tsai, Y.C.; Chien, C.T. Glia-derived exosomal miR-274 targets Sprouty in trachea and synaptic boutons to modulate growth and responses to hypoxia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 24651–24661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wei, G.; Sun, L.; Li, R.; Li, L.; Xu, J.; Ma, F. Dynamic miRNA-mRNA regulations are essential for maintaining Drosophila immune homeostasis during Micrococcus luteus infection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2018, 81, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, M.J.; Choe, K.M. Basement membrane and cell integrity of self-tissues in maintaining Drosophila immunological tolerance. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lim, D.H.; Oh, C.T.; Han, S.J.; Lee, Y.S. Methods for studying the biological consequences of endo-siRNA deficiency in Drosophila melanogaster. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1173, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lim, J.H.; Kim, D.J.; Lee, D.E.; Han, J.Y.; Chung, J.H.; Ahn, H.K.; Lee, S.W.; Lim, D.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Park, S.Y.; et al. Genome-wide microRNA expression profiling in placentas of fetuses with Down syndrome. Placenta 2015, 36, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lim, D.H.; Lee, S.; Choi, M.S.; Han, J.Y.; Seong, Y.; Na, D.; Kwon, Y.S.; Lee, Y.S. The conserved microRNA miR-8-3p coordinates the expression of V-ATPase subunits to regulate ecdysone biosynthesis for Drosophila metamorphosis. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 6449–6465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McCabe, J.; French, V.; Partridge, L. Joint regulation of cell size and cell number in the wing blade of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 1997, 69, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lim, D.H.; Lee, S.; Han, J.Y.; Choi, M.S.; Hong, J.S.; Lee, Y.S. MicroRNA miR-252 targets mbt to control the developmental growth of Drosophila. Insect Mol. Biol. 2019, 28, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Edelheit, O.; Hanukoglu, A.; Hanukoglu, I. Simple and efficient site-directed mutagenesis using two single-primer reactions in parallel to generate mutants for protein structure-function studies. BMC Biotechnol. 2009, 9, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Asha, H.; Nagy, I.; Kovacs, G.; Stetson, D.; Ando, I.; Dearolf, C.R. Analysis of Ras-induced overproliferation in Drosophila hemocytes. Genetics 2003, 163, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Callus, B.A.; Mathey-Prevot, B. SOCS36E, a novel Drosophila SOCS protein, suppresses JAK/STAT and EGF-R signalling in the imaginal wing disc. Oncogene 2002, 21, 4812–4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wright, V.M.; Vogt, K.L.; Smythe, E.; Zeidler, M.P. Differential activities of the Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway ligands Upd, Upd2 and Upd3. Cell Signal 2011, 23, 920–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Agaisse, H.; Petersen, U.M.; Boutros, M.; Mathey-Prevot, B.; Perrimon, N. Signaling role of hemocytes in Drosophila JAK/STAT-dependent response to septic injury. Dev. Cell 2003, 5, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bazzi, W.; Cattenoz, P.B.; Delaporte, C.; Dasari, V.; Sakr, R.; Yuasa, Y.; Giangrande, A. Embryonic hematopoiesis modulates the inflammatory response and larval hematopoiesis in Drosophila. eLife 2018, 7, e34890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Shin, M.; Cha, N.; Koranteng, F.; Cho, B.; Shim, J. Subpopulation of Macrophage-Like Plasmatocytes Attenuates Systemic Growth via JAK/STAT in the Drosophila Fat Body. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Edgar, B.A. How flies get their size: Genetics meets physiology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Carrasco, J.; Mateos, F.; Hilgers, V. A critical developmental window for ELAV/Hu-dependent mRNA signatures at the onset of neuronal differentiation. Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 111542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. McMahon, A.C.; Rahman, R.; Jin, H.; Shen, J.L.; Fieldsend, A.; Luo, W.; Rosbash, M. TRIBE: Hijacking an RNA-Editing Enzyme to Identify Cell-Specific Targets of RNA-Binding Proteins. Cell 2016, 165, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Alizzi, R.A.; Xu, D.; Tenenbaum, C.M.; Wang, W.; Gavis, E.R. The ELAV/Hu protein Found in neurons regulates cytoskeletal and ECM adhesion inputs for space-filling dendrite growth. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1009235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Igaki, T. Correcting developmental errors by apoptosis: Lessons from Drosophila JNK signaling. Apoptosis 2009, 14, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Alfa, R.W.; Kim, S.K. Using Drosophila to discover mechanisms underlying type 2 diabetes. Dis. Model. Mech. 2016, 9, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chi, C.; Wang, L.; Lan, W.; Zhao, L.; Su, Y. PpV, acting via the JNK pathway, represses apoptosis during normal development of Drosophila wing. Apoptosis 2018, 23, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Igaki, T.; Kanda, H.; Yamamoto-Goto, Y.; Kanuka, H.; Kuranaga, E.; Aigaki, T.; Miura, M. Eiger, a TNF superfamily ligand that triggers the Drosophila JNK pathway. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 3009–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rajan, A.; Perrimon, N. Drosophila cytokine unpaired 2 regulates physiological homeostasis by remotely controlling insulin secretion. Cell 2012, 151, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 14 00709 g001
Figure 1. miR-274 is involved in the formation of melanotic mass. (A) Overexpression of miR-274-5p in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. U6 snRNA was used as a control for normalization. (B) Quantitative data showing the percentage of wandering third-instar larvae with melanotic masses. n is the total number of analyzed larvae. (C) Wandering third-instar larvae of the indicated genotypes exhibiting melanotic masses. Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box image is magnified. (D) Adult flies exhibiting melanotic masses in the indicated genotypes and sexes (M, male; F, female). Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box images are magnified. (E) Expression level of socs36E mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. rp49 served as a control for normalization. (F) Expression level of upd3 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. (G) Expression level of upd2 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. (H) Protein level of p-JNK in the larval fat body of Cg>miR-274. Representative band image (left) and quantitative bar graph (right) are shown. β-Tubulin served as a loading control. (I) Expression level of Itgbn mRNA in the hemocytes of Cg>miR-274 larvae. The error bars on the bar plots (A,E–I) indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Figure 1. miR-274 is involved in the formation of melanotic mass. (A) Overexpression of miR-274-5p in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. U6 snRNA was used as a control for normalization. (B) Quantitative data showing the percentage of wandering third-instar larvae with melanotic masses. n is the total number of analyzed larvae. (C) Wandering third-instar larvae of the indicated genotypes exhibiting melanotic masses. Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box image is magnified. (D) Adult flies exhibiting melanotic masses in the indicated genotypes and sexes (M, male; F, female). Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box images are magnified. (E) Expression level of socs36E mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. rp49 served as a control for normalization. (F) Expression level of upd3 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. (G) Expression level of upd2 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. (H) Protein level of p-JNK in the larval fat body of Cg>miR-274. Representative band image (left) and quantitative bar graph (right) are shown. β-Tubulin served as a loading control. (I) Expression level of Itgbn mRNA in the hemocytes of Cg>miR-274 larvae. The error bars on the bar plots (A,E–I) indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Insects 14 00709 g001
Insects 14 00709 g002
Figure 2. Overexpression of miR-274 in the fat body reduces developmental growth. (A) Whole fat bodies of wandering third-instar larvae of the indicated genotypes (n = 5). Scale bar, 1 mm. (B) Representative phalloidin staining images of the larval fat body (phalloidin, red; DAPI, blue). Scale bar, 50 µm. (C) Relative size of the fat body cells in Cg>miR-274 larvae. The quantitative violin plot is shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). n is the total number of analyzed fat body cells (from five larvae). (D) Expression level of InR mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. (E) Eclosion rate from pupae to adult flies in each genotype. n is the total number of analyzed pupae. P-value, as assessed by Chi-square test. (F) Body weight of Cg>miR-274 flies. n is the total number of analyzed flies. (G) Representative wing images of female flies of the indicated genotypes. Scale bar, 0.5 mm. (H) Relative comparison of wing size between Cg/+ and Cg>miR-274 female flies (n = 10 per each genotype). (I,J) Relative cell size (I) and total cell number (J) of adult wings analyzed in the H panel. All bar plots (D,F,H–J) are shown as the mean ± SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Figure 2. Overexpression of miR-274 in the fat body reduces developmental growth. (A) Whole fat bodies of wandering third-instar larvae of the indicated genotypes (n = 5). Scale bar, 1 mm. (B) Representative phalloidin staining images of the larval fat body (phalloidin, red; DAPI, blue). Scale bar, 50 µm. (C) Relative size of the fat body cells in Cg>miR-274 larvae. The quantitative violin plot is shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). n is the total number of analyzed fat body cells (from five larvae). (D) Expression level of InR mRNA in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. (E) Eclosion rate from pupae to adult flies in each genotype. n is the total number of analyzed pupae. P-value, as assessed by Chi-square test. (F) Body weight of Cg>miR-274 flies. n is the total number of analyzed flies. (G) Representative wing images of female flies of the indicated genotypes. Scale bar, 0.5 mm. (H) Relative comparison of wing size between Cg/+ and Cg>miR-274 female flies (n = 10 per each genotype). (I,J) Relative cell size (I) and total cell number (J) of adult wings analyzed in the H panel. All bar plots (D,F,H–J) are shown as the mean ± SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Insects 14 00709 g002
Insects 14 00709 g003
Figure 3. miR-274 suppresses fne expression. (A) Expression of the fne mRNA transcripts with the short or extended 3′-UTR. Isoforms of fne mRNA transcripts with different lengths of 3′-UTR, each primer binding site (1F/1R and 2F/2R, red box), and two miR-274-5p binding sites (BS1 and BS2, blue box) are shown (top). Semi-RT-qPCR at two different sites in the fne 3′-UTR in the larval fat bodies (bottom). Adult heads were used as a positive control. (B) Expression of nuclear fne (nfne) transcript containing the microexon (red box) in the larval fat bodies. Schematic of the fne microexon (top) and the expression of two fne isoforms in the larval fat bodies and adult heads (bottom). Blue and red boxes indicate exons, and gray lines indicate introns. The primer binding sites for RT-qPCR are marked as arrows. (C) Downregulation of the fne mRNA level in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. rp49 served as a control for normalization. (D) Overexpression of miR-274-5p in S2 cells. U6 snRNA was used as a control. (E) Relative activity of the Renilla-luciferase (RL) fused with either the wild-type (WT) or mutated (MT) fne 3′-UTR. The sequences of WT and MT fne 3′-UTR and miR-274-5p are shown (top). The mutated sequences are highlighted in bold red. The RL activity was normalized to the firefly luciferase (FL) activity (bottom). All bar plots are shown as the mean ± SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test (C,D) or ANOVA with a supplementary Dunnett’s test (E).
Figure 3. miR-274 suppresses fne expression. (A) Expression of the fne mRNA transcripts with the short or extended 3′-UTR. Isoforms of fne mRNA transcripts with different lengths of 3′-UTR, each primer binding site (1F/1R and 2F/2R, red box), and two miR-274-5p binding sites (BS1 and BS2, blue box) are shown (top). Semi-RT-qPCR at two different sites in the fne 3′-UTR in the larval fat bodies (bottom). Adult heads were used as a positive control. (B) Expression of nuclear fne (nfne) transcript containing the microexon (red box) in the larval fat bodies. Schematic of the fne microexon (top) and the expression of two fne isoforms in the larval fat bodies and adult heads (bottom). Blue and red boxes indicate exons, and gray lines indicate introns. The primer binding sites for RT-qPCR are marked as arrows. (C) Downregulation of the fne mRNA level in the fat body of Cg>miR-274 larvae. rp49 served as a control for normalization. (D) Overexpression of miR-274-5p in S2 cells. U6 snRNA was used as a control. (E) Relative activity of the Renilla-luciferase (RL) fused with either the wild-type (WT) or mutated (MT) fne 3′-UTR. The sequences of WT and MT fne 3′-UTR and miR-274-5p are shown (top). The mutated sequences are highlighted in bold red. The RL activity was normalized to the firefly luciferase (FL) activity (bottom). All bar plots are shown as the mean ± SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test (C,D) or ANOVA with a supplementary Dunnett’s test (E).
Insects 14 00709 g003
Insects 14 00709 g004
Figure 4. Depletion of fne results in melanotic mass formation. (A) Knockdown of fne in the fat body using RNAiTRiP line driven by Cg-GAL4. rp49 served as a control for normalization. (B) Melanotic mass formation in Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box image is magnified. (C) Percentage of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae exhibiting melanotic masses. n is the total number of analyzed larvae. (D) Maintenance of melanotic mass in Cg>fne-RNAi adults. Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box images are magnified. (E) Expression level of socs36E mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (F) Expression level of upd3 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (G) Expression level of upd2 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (H) Protein level of p-JNK in the larval fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi. Representative band image (left) and quantitative bar graph (right) are shown. β-Tubulin served as a loading control. (I) Expression level of Itgbn mRNA in the hemocytes of Cg>fne-RNAi. The error bars on the bar plots (A,E–I) indicate SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. Depletion of fne results in melanotic mass formation. (A) Knockdown of fne in the fat body using RNAiTRiP line driven by Cg-GAL4. rp49 served as a control for normalization. (B) Melanotic mass formation in Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box image is magnified. (C) Percentage of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae exhibiting melanotic masses. n is the total number of analyzed larvae. (D) Maintenance of melanotic mass in Cg>fne-RNAi adults. Melanotic masses are marked as arrows. The dashed box images are magnified. (E) Expression level of socs36E mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (F) Expression level of upd3 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (G) Expression level of upd2 mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (H) Protein level of p-JNK in the larval fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi. Representative band image (left) and quantitative bar graph (right) are shown. β-Tubulin served as a loading control. (I) Expression level of Itgbn mRNA in the hemocytes of Cg>fne-RNAi. The error bars on the bar plots (A,E–I) indicate SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Insects 14 00709 g004
Insects 14 00709 g005
Figure 5. Knockdown of fne causes growth reduction. (A) Whole fat bodies of wandering third-instar larvae of the indicated genotypes (n = 5). Scale bar, 1 mm. (B) Representative phalloidin staining images of the larval fat body (phalloidin, green). Scale bar, 50 µm. (C) Relative size of the fat body cells in Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. The quantitative violin plot is shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). n is the total number of analyzed fat body cells (from five larvae). (D) Expression level of InR mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (E) Reduced eclosion rate of Cg>fne-RNAi pupae. n is the total number of analyzed pupae. p-value, as assessed by Chi-square test. (F) Body weight of Cg>fne-RNAi flies. n is the total number of analyzed flies. (G) Representative wing images of female flies of the indicated genotypes. Scale bar, 0.5 mm. (H) Relative comparison of wing size between Cg/+ and Cg>fne-RNAi female flies (n = 7 per each genotype). (I,J) Relative cell size (I) and total cell number (J) of adult wings analyzed in the H panel. All bar plots (D,F,H–J) are shown as the mean ± SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Figure 5. Knockdown of fne causes growth reduction. (A) Whole fat bodies of wandering third-instar larvae of the indicated genotypes (n = 5). Scale bar, 1 mm. (B) Representative phalloidin staining images of the larval fat body (phalloidin, green). Scale bar, 50 µm. (C) Relative size of the fat body cells in Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. The quantitative violin plot is shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). n is the total number of analyzed fat body cells (from five larvae). (D) Expression level of InR mRNA in the fat body of Cg>fne-RNAi larvae. (E) Reduced eclosion rate of Cg>fne-RNAi pupae. n is the total number of analyzed pupae. p-value, as assessed by Chi-square test. (F) Body weight of Cg>fne-RNAi flies. n is the total number of analyzed flies. (G) Representative wing images of female flies of the indicated genotypes. Scale bar, 0.5 mm. (H) Relative comparison of wing size between Cg/+ and Cg>fne-RNAi female flies (n = 7 per each genotype). (I,J) Relative cell size (I) and total cell number (J) of adult wings analyzed in the H panel. All bar plots (D,F,H–J) are shown as the mean ± SEM. The dots on the bar plot indicate individual data values. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with the control, as assessed by Student’s t-test.
Insects 14 00709 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.K.; Kim, C.J.; Jang, D.; Lim, D.-H. MicroRNA miR-274-5p Suppresses Found-in-Neurons Associated with Melanotic Mass Formation and Developmental Growth in Drosophila. Insects 2023, 14, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080709

AMA Style

Kim HK, Kim CJ, Jang D, Lim D-H. MicroRNA miR-274-5p Suppresses Found-in-Neurons Associated with Melanotic Mass Formation and Developmental Growth in Drosophila. Insects. 2023; 14(8):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hee Kyung, Chae Jeong Kim, Daegyu Jang, and Do-Hwan Lim. 2023. "MicroRNA miR-274-5p Suppresses Found-in-Neurons Associated with Melanotic Mass Formation and Developmental Growth in Drosophila" Insects 14, no. 8: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop