Diversity and Abundance of Microbial Communities in UASB Reactors during Methane Production from Hydrolyzed Wheat Straw and Lucerne
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Operation of UASB Reactors
2.1.1. Treatment of Reactor 2B at Acidification During P2
2.1.2. Unusual Events during P4
2.2. Sampling of Microbial Granules
2.3. Analytical Methods
2.4. DNA Extraction and Microbial Community Analysis
2.5. Modeling
3. Results
3.1. UASB Process
3.1.1. Periods 1, 2, and 3
3.1.2. Period 4
3.2. Microbial Communities
3.2.1. Diversity Indices
3.2.2. Correlation of Microbial Community Structure with Process Variables
3.3. Modeling
4. Discussion
4.1. Overall Microbial Community Structure
4.2. Influence of Process Variables on the Microbial Community
4.2.1. Correlation between Bacteria Groups and Organic Acids
4.2.2. Correlation between Bacteria Groups and OLR
4.2.3. Correlation between Bacteria Groups and Total COD Fed
4.2.4. Correlations between Process Variables and Archaea Groups
4.3. Possible Bias Introduced by Using Two Different Primers for Archaeal Community
4.4. Relations between ADM1 Predictions and Experimental Data
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lal, R. World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Searle, S.; Malins, C. Availability of Cellulosic Residues and Wastes in the EU; International Council on Clean Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament; Council of The European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 140, 16–62. [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament; Council of The European Union. Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 Amending Directive 98/70/EC Relating to the Quality of Petrol and Diesel Fuels and Amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Off. J. Eur. Union 2015, 239, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
- Byrne, E.; Kovacs, K.; van Niel, E.W.J.; Willquist, K.; Svensson, S.-E.; Kreuger, E. Reduced use of phosphorus and water in sequential dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion of wheat straw and the application of ensiled steam-pretreated lucerne as a macronutrient provider in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Littlewood, J.; Murphy, R.J. Environmental sustainability of bioethanol production from wheat straw in the UK. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 28, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cheng, C.-L.; Lo, Y.-C.; Lee, K.-S.; Lee, D.-J.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chang, J.-S. Biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic feedstock. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 8514–8523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Müller, B.; Schnürer, A. Biogas production from wheat straw: Community structure of cellulose-degrading bacteria. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2013, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaparaju, P.; Serrano, M.; Thomsen, A.B.; Kongjan, P.; Angelidaki, I. Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 2562–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bondesson, P.-M.; Galbe, M. Process design of SSCF for ethanol production from steam-pretreated, acetic-acid-impregnated wheat straw. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Torry-Smith, M.; Sommer, P.; Ahring, B.K. Purification of bioethanol effluent in an UASB reactor system with simultaneous biogas formation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ljunggren, M.; Zacchi, G. Techno-economic analysis of a two-step biological process producing hydrogen and methane. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7780–7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borjesson, P.; Tufvesson, L.M. Agricultural crop-based biofuels—Resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willquist, K.; Nkemka, V.N.; Svensson, H.; Pawar, S.; Ljunggren, M.; Karlsson, H.; Murto, M.; Hulteberg, C.; Van Niel, E.W.J.; Liden, G. Design of a novel biohythane process with high H2 and CH4 production rates. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 17749–17762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekman, A.; Wallberg, O.; Joelsson, E.; Börjesson, P. Possibilities for sustainable biorefineries based on agricultural residues—A case study of potential straw-based ethanol production in Sweden. Appl. Energy 2013, 102, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lantz, M.; Kreuger, E.; Björnsson, L. An economic comparison of dedicated crops vs agricultural residues as feedstock for biogas of vehicle fuel quality. Aims Energy 2017, 5, 838–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghaddam, E.A.; Ahlgren, S.; Hulteberg, C.; Nordberg, A. Energy balance and global warming potential of biogas-based fuels from a life cycle perspective. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 132, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kougias, P.G.; Angelidaki, I. Biogas and its opportunities—A review. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westerholm, M.; Schnürer, A. Microbial Responses to Different Operating Practices for Biogas Production Systems; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, T. Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Agricultural Residues. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Vavilin, V.; Fernandez, B.; Palatsi, J.; Flotats, X. Hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic material: An overview. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynd, L.R.; Weimer, P.J.; Van Zyl, W.H.; Pretorius, I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 506–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Triolo, J.M.; Sommer, S.G.; Møller, H.B.; Weisbjerg, M.R.; Jiang, X.Y. A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: Influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 9395–9402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkemka, V.N.; Murto, M. Biogas production from wheat straw in batch and UASB reactors: The roles of pretreatment and seaweed hydrolysate as a co-substrate. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawar, S.S.; Nkemka, V.N.; Zeidan, A.A.; Murto, M.; van Niel, E.W.J. Biohydrogen production from wheat straw hydrolysate using Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus followed by biogas production in a two-step uncoupled process. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 9121–9130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Batstone, D.J.; Keller, J.; Angelidaki, I.; Kalyuzhnyi, S.; Pavlostathis, S.; Rozzi, A.; Sanders, W.; Siegrist, H.; Vavilin, V. The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM 1). Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lettinga, G. Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1995, 67, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Lier, J.; Boersma, F.; Debets, M.; Lettinga, G. High rate thermophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment in compartmentalized upflow reactors. Water Sci. Technol. 1994, 30, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrero, A.; Gomez, R.; Snedecor, B.; Tolman, C.; Roberts, M. Growth inhibition of Clostridium thermocellum by carboxylic acids: A mechanism based on uncoupling by weak acids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1985, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vavilin, V.A.; Schelkanov, M.Y.; Lokshina, L.Y.; Rytov, S.V.; Jokela, J.; Salminen, E.; Rintala, J. A comparative analysis of a balance between the rates of polymer hydrolysis and acetoclastic methanogenesis during anaerobic digestion of solid waste. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horn, M.A.; Matthies, C.; Küsel, K.; Schramm, A.; Drake, H.L. Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis by moderately acid-tolerant methanogens of a methane-emitting acidic peat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fukuzaki, S.; Nishio, N.; Shobayashi, M.; Nagai, S. Inhibition of the Fermentation of Propionate to Methane by Hydrogen, Acetate, and Propionate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 719–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heyes, R.H.; Hall, R.J. Kinetics of two subgroups of propionate-using organisms in anaerobic digestion. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1983, 46, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mösche, M.; Jördening, H.-J. Comparison of different models of substrate and product inhibition in anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 1999, 33, 2545–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Ban, Q.; Li, J.; Jha, A.K. Response of syntrophic propionate degradation to pH decrease and microbial community shifts in an UASB reactor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 1409–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Ban, Q.; Li, J. Microbial community dynamics at high organic loading rates revealed by pyrosequencing during sugar refinery wastewater treatment in a UASB reactor. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y.X.; Jiang, Y.; Zeng, R.J. No difference in inhibition among free acids of acetate, propionate and butyrate on hydrogenotrophic methanogen of Methanobacterium formicicum. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 294, 122237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carballa, M.; Regueiro, L.; Lema, J.M. Microbial management of anaerobic digestion: Exploiting the microbiome-functionality nexus. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lebuhn, M.; Weiß, S.; Munk, B.; Guebitz, G.M. Microbiology and molecular biology tools for biogas process analysis, diagnosis and control. In Biogas Science and Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzeland, 2015; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Tao, Y.; Temudo, M.; Bijl, H.; Kloek, J.; Ren, N.; Van Lier, J.B.; De Kreuk, M. Biomethanation from enzymatically hydrolyzed brewer’s spent grain: Impact of rapid increase in loadings. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 190, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khanzada, A. Determination of Dissociation Constants of Propionic Acid and Lactic Acid (2-hydroxypropionic acid) by Potentiometry and Conductometry. Pak. J. Anal. Environ. Chem. 2004, 5, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Hugerth, L.W.; Wefer, H.A.; Lundin, S.; Jakobsson, H.E.; Lindberg, M.; Rodin, S.; Engstrand, L.; Andersson, A.F. DegePrime, a Program for Degenerate Primer Design for Broad-Taxonomic-Range PCR in Microbial Ecology Studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5116–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Takai, K.; Horikoshi, K. Rapid detection and quantification of members of the archaeal community by quantitative PCR using fluorogenic probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 5066–5072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, T.; Sun, L.; Nordberg, Å.; Schnürer, A. Substrate-Induced Response in Biogas Process Performance and Microbial Community Relates Back to Inoculum Source. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jost, L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 2006, 113, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas, R.; Groeneveld, J.; Harms, H.; Johst, K.; Frank, K.; Kleinsteuber, S. A critical evaluation of ecological indices for the comparative analysis of microbial communities based on molecular datasets. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Westerholm, M.; Hansson, M.; Schnurer, A. Improved biogas production from whole stillage by co-digestion with cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeppsson, U.; Rosen, C. Aspects on ADM1 Implementation within the BSM2 Framework; Lund University: Lund, Sweden, 2006; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
- Schnürer, A. Biogas Production: Microbiology and Technology. In Anaerobes in Biotechnology; Hatti-Kaul, R., Mamo, G., Mattiasson, B., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 195–234. [Google Scholar]
- Pap, B.; Maróti, G. Diversity of Microbial Communities in Biogas Reactors. Curr. Biochem. Eng. 2016, 3, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antwi, P.; Li, J.; Boadi, P.O.; Meng, J.; Koblah Quashie, F.; Wang, X.; Ren, N.; Buelna, G. Efficiency of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating potato starch processing wastewater and related process kinetics, functional microbial community and sludge morphology. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 239, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, M.; Li, P. Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the biodegradation of trichloroethylene wastewater and anaerobic bacterial community in the UASB reactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1977–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nelson, M.C.; Morrison, M.; Yu, Z. A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 3730–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goux, X.; Calusinska, M.; Lemaigre, S.; Marynowska, M.; Klocke, M.; Udelhoven, T.; Benizri, E.; Delfosse, P. Microbial community dynamics in replicate anaerobic digesters exposed sequentially to increasing organic loading rate, acidosis, and process recovery. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sun, L.; Liu, T.; Müller, B.; Schnürer, A. The microbial community structure in industrial biogas plants influences the degradation rate of straw and cellulose in batch tests. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rui, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.; Yan, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. The core populations and co-occurrence patterns of prokaryotic communities in household biogas digesters. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kleinsteuber, S. Metagenomics of Methanogenic Communities in Anaerobic Digesters. In Biogenesis of Hydrocarbons; Stams, A.J.M., Sousa, D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Azman, S.; Khadem, A.F.; Lier, J.B.; Zeeman, G.; Plugge, C.M. Presence and role of anaerobic hydrolytic microbes in conversion of lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Sun, L.; Schnürer, B.M.A. Importance of inoculum source and initial community structure for biogas production from agricultural substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Šafarič, L.; Shakeri Yekta, S.; Liu, T.; Svensson, B.; Schnürer, A.; Bastviken, D.; Björn, A. Dynamics of a Perturbed Microbial Community during Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chemically Defined Soluble Organic Compounds. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MacLeod, F.A.; Guiot, S.R.; Costerton, J.W. Layered structure of bacterial aggregates produced in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed and filter reactor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 1598–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schmidt, J.E.; Ahring, B.K. Granular sludge formation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1996, 49, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hulshoff Pol, L.W.; de Castro Lopes, S.I.; Lettinga, G.; Lens, P.N.L. Anaerobic sludge granulation. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1376–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Kougias, P.G.; Treu, L.; Campanaro, S.; Angelidaki, I. Microbial community changes in methanogenic granules during the transition from mesophilic to thermophilic conditions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrén, J. Comparison of Anaerobic Sludge Granules from Different Wastewater Plants with Respect to Granule Size, Substrate Degradation and Methanogenic Community. Master’s Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kadam, P.C.; Boone, D.R. Influence of pH on Ammonia Accumulation and Toxicity in Halophilic, Methylotrophic Methanogens. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1996, 62, 4486–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xafenias, N.; Mapelli, V. Performance and bacterial enrichment of bioelectrochemical systems during methane and acetate production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 21864–21875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parameswaran, P.; Zhang, H.; Torres, C.I.; Rittmann, B.E.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R. Microbial community structure in a biofilm anode fed with a fermentable substrate: The significance of hydrogen scavengers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 105, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lei, Y.; Wei, L.; Liu, T.; Xiao, Y.; Dang, Y.; Sun, D.; Holmes, D.E. Magnetite enhances anaerobic digestion and methanogenesis of fresh leachate from a municipal solid waste incineration plant. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 348, 992–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moosbrugger, R.E.; Wentzel, M.C.; Ekama, G.A.; Marais, G.v.R. Treatment of Wine Distillery Waste in UASB Systems—Feasibility, Alkalinity Requirements and pH Control. Water Sci. Technol. 1993, 28, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.-T.; Fan, X.-L.; Zhao, X.-X.; Fu, S.-F.; He, S.; Manasa, M.R.K.; Guo, R.-B. Effects of organic loading rate on biogas production from macroalgae: Performance and microbial community structure. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 235, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honda, T.; Fujita, T.; Tonouchi, A. Aminivibrio pyruvatiphilus gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic, amino-acid-degrading bacterium from soil of a Japanese rice field. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 3679–3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Gou, M.; Xia, Z.; Hu, B.; Nie, Y.; Tang, Y. Identification of Novel Butyrate- and Acetate-Oxidizing Bacteria in Butyrate-Fed Mesophilic Anaerobic Chemostats by DNA-Based Stable Isotope Probing. Microb. Ecol. 2020, 79, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.W.; Yu, H.S.; Liu, Q.M.; Jung, H.M.; An, D.S.; Im, W.T.; Jin, F.X.; Lee, S.T. Kaistia granuli sp. nov., isolated from anaerobic granules in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Int. J. Syst Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 2280–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández, N.; Sierra-Alvarez, R.; Amils, R.; Field, J.A.; Sanz, J.L. Compared microbiology of granular sludge under autotrophic, mixotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, C.M.; Liu, W.-T. Community Structure Analysis of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Biofilms and the Significance of Rhizobiales Bacteria in Biofouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4728–4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calderón, K.; Rodelas, B.; Cabirol, N.; González-López, J.; Noyola, A. Analysis of microbial communities developed on the fouling layers of a membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor applied to wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 4618–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fritts, R.K.; LaSarre, B.; Stoner, A.M.; Posto, A.L.; McKinlay, J.B. A Rhizobiales-Specific Unipolar Polysaccharide Adhesin Contributes to Rhodopseudomonas palustris Biofilm Formation across Diverse Photoheterotrophic Conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e03035-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mirjafari, P.; Baldwin, S. Decline in Performance of Biochemical Reactors for Sulphate Removal from Mine-Influenced Water is Accompanied by Changes in Organic Matter Characteristics and Microbial Population Composition. Water 2016, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahmad, F.; Sakamoto, I.K.; Adorno, M.A.T.; Motteran, F.; Silva, E.L.; Varesche, M.B.A. Methane Production from Hydrogen Peroxide Assisted Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Solid Fraction Sugarcane Bagasse. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2020, 11, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.-J.; Wang, W.-Q.; Chen, C.; Xie, P.; Liu, W.-Z.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.-T.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, A.-J.; Lee, D.-J.; et al. The effect of PBS on methane production in combined MEC-AD system fed with alkaline pretreated sewage sludge. Renew. Energy 2020, 152, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briones, A.M.; Daugherty, B.J.; Angenent, L.T.; Rausch, K.D.; Tumbleson, M.E.; Raskin, L. Microbial diversity and dynamics in multi- and single-compartment anaerobic bioreactors processing sulfate-rich waste streams. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balk, M.; Stams, A.J.M.; Weijma, J. Thermotoga lettingae sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, methanol-degrading bacterium isolated from a thermophilic anaerobic reactor. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Skennerton, C.T.; Haroon, M.F.; Briegel, A.; Shi, J.; Jensen, G.J.; Tyson, G.W.; Orphan, V.J. Phylogenomic analysis of Candidatus ‘Izimaplasma’ species: Free-living representatives from a Tenericutes clade found in methane seeps. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2679–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mumford, A.C.; Akob, D.M.; Klinges, J.G.; Cozzarelli, I.M. Common Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Additives Alter the Structure and Function of Anaerobic Microbial Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02729-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vavourakis, C.D.; Andrei, A.-S.; Mehrshad, M.; Ghai, R.; Sorokin, D.Y.; Muyzer, G. A metagenomics roadmap to the uncultured genome diversity in hypersaline soda lake sediments. Microbiome 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nazina, T.N.; Sokolova, D.S.; Babich, T.L.; Semenova, E.M.; Borzenkov, I.A.; Bidzhieva, S.K.; Merkel, A.Y.; Khisametdinov, M.R.; Tourova, T.P. Phylogenetic Diversity of Microorganisms from the Sludge of a Biogas Reactor Processing Oil-Containing and Municipal Waste. Microbiology 2018, 87, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsavkelova, E.; Prokudina, L.; Egorova, M.; Leontieva, M.; Malakhova, D.; Netrusov, A. The structure of the anaerobic thermophilic microbial community for the bioconversion of the cellulose-containing substrates into biogas. Process. Biochem. 2018, 66, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kampmann, K.; Ratering, S.; Kramer, I.; Schmidt, M.; Zerr, W.; Schnell, S. Unexpected stability of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes communities in laboratory biogas reactors fed with different defined substrates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2106–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schnürer, A.; Jarvis, Å. Microbiology of the Biogas Process; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, M.C.; Morrison, M.; Schanbacher, F.; Yu, Z. Shifts in microbial community structure of granular and liquid biomass in response to changes to infeed and digester design in anaerobic digesters receiving food-processing wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 107, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, L.; Pope, P.B.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Schnürer, A. Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 815–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yun, J.; Lee, S.D.; Cho, K.-S. Biomethane production and microbial community response according to influent concentration of molasses wastewater in a UASB reactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 4675–4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, P.; Forbes, C.; Colleran, E. Investigation of the diversity of homoacetogenic bacteria in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic sludges using the formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase gene. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, E.J.; Sotres, A.; Arenas, C.B.; Blanco, D.; Martínez, O.; Gómez, X. Improving Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge by Hydrogen Addition: Analysis of Microbial Populations and Process Performance. Energies 2019, 12, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Solli, L.; Håvelsrud, O.E.; Horn, S.J.; Rike, A.G. A metagenomic study of the microbial communities in four parallel biogas reactors. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abe, K.; Ueki, A.; Ohtaki, Y.; Kaku, N.; Watanabe, K.; Ueki, K. Anaerocella delicata gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium in the phylum Bacteroidetes isolated from a methanogenic reactor of cattle farms. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nagai, F.; Morotomi, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Sakon, H.; Tanaka, R. Alistipes indistinctus sp. nov. and Odoribacter laneus sp. nov., common members of the human intestinal microbiota isolated from faeces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 1296–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Kononen, E.; Rautio, M.; Liu, C.; Bryk, A.; Eerola, E.; Finegold, S.M. Alistipes onderdonkii sp. nov. and Alistipes shahii sp. nov., of human origin. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1985–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Godon, J.J.; Zumstein, E.; Dabert, P.; Habouzit, F.; Moletta, R. Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 2802–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mackenzie, L.M.; Muigai, A.T.; Osir, E.O.; Lwande, W.; Keller, M.; Toledo, G.; Boga, H.I. Bacterial diversity in the intestinal tract of the funguscultivating termite Macrotermes michaelseni (Sjöstedt). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Sabree, Z.L.; Moran, N.A. Host-specific assemblages typify gut microbial communities of related insect species. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsitko, I.; Lusa, M.; Lehto, J.; Parviainen, L.; Ikonen, A.T.; Lahdenperä, A.-M.; Bomberg, M. The variation of microbial communities in a depth profile of an acidic, nutrient-poor boreal bog in southwestern Finland. Open J. Ecol. 2014, 4, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Youssef, N.; Steidley, B.L.; Elshahed, M.S. Novel high-rank phylogenetic lineages within a sulfur spring (Zodletone Spring, Oklahoma), revealed using a combined pyrosequencing-sanger approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2677–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Vrieze, J.; Hennebel, T.; Boon, N.; Verstraete, W. Methanosarcina: The rediscovered methanogen for heavy duty biomethanation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 112, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziganshin, A.M.; Ziganshina, E.E.; Kleinsteuber, S.; Nikolausz, M. Comparative Analysis of Methanogenic Communities in Different Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digesters. Archaea 2016, 2016, 3401272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakeri Yekta, S.; Liu, T.; Axelsson Bjerg, M.; Šafarič, L.; Karlsson, A.; Björn, A.; Schnürer, A. Sulfide level in municipal sludge digesters affects microbial community response to long-chain fatty acid loads. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westerholm, M.; Liu, T.; Schnürer, A. Comparative study of industrial-scale high-solid biogas production from food waste: Process operation and microbiology. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 304, 122981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skirnisdottir, S.; Hreggvidsson, G.O.; Hjörleifsdottir, S.; Marteinsson, V.T.; Petursdottir, S.K.; Holst, O.; Kristjansson, J.K. Influence of Sulfide and Temperature on Species Composition and Community Structure of Hot Spring Microbial Mats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2835–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raymann, K.; Moeller, A.H.; Goodman, A.L.; Ochman, H. Unexplored Archaeal Diversity in the Great Ape Gut Microbiome. MSphere 2017, 2, e00026-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ong, S.H.; Kukkillaya, V.U.; Wilm, A.; Lay, C.; Ho, E.X.P.; Low, L.; Hibberd, M.L.; Nagarajan, N. Species Identification and Profiling of Complex Microbial Communities Using Shotgun Illumina Sequencing of 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequences. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, Y.; Li, M.; Perumal, V.; Feng, X.; Fang, J.; Xie, J.; Sievert, S.M.; Wang, F. Genomic and enzymatic evidence for acetogenesis among multiple lineages of the archaeal phylum Bathyarchaeota widespread in marine sediments. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evans, P.N.; Parks, D.H.; Chadwick, G.L.; Robbins, S.J.; Orphan, V.J.; Golding, S.D.; Tyson, G.W. Methane metabolism in the archaeal phylum Bathyarchaeota revealed by genome-centric metagenomics. Science 2015, 350, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiang, X.; Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Gong, L.; Man, B.; Xu, Y. Distribution of Bathyarchaeota Communities Across Different Terrestrial Settings and Their Potential Ecological Functions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shcherbakova, V.; Yoshimura, Y.; Ryzhmanova, Y.; Taguchi, Y.; Segawa, T.; Oshurkova, V.; Rivkina, E. Archaeal communities of Arctic methane-containing permafrost. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ortiz-Alvarez, R.; Casamayor, E.O. High occurrence of Pacearchaeota and Woesearchaeota (Archaea superphylum DPANN) in the surface waters of oligotrophic high-altitude lakes. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2016, 8, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castelle, C.J.; Wrighton, K.C.; Brian, C.T.; Hug, L.A.; Brown, C.T.; Wilkins, M.J.; Frischkorn, K.R.; Tringe, S.G.; Singh, A.; Markillie, L.M.; et al. Genomic Expansion of Domain Archaea Highlights Roles for Organisms from New Phyla in Anaerobic Carbon Cycling. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, 690–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calusinska, M.; Goux, X.; Fossépré, M.; Muller, E.E.L.; Wilmes, P.; Delfosse, P. A year of monitoring 20 mesophilic full-scale bioreactors reveals the existence of stable but different core microbiomes in bio-waste and wastewater anaerobic digestion systems. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkiteshwaran, K.; Milferstedt, K.; Hamelin, J.; Zitomer, D.H. Anaerobic digester bioaugmentation influences quasi steady state performance and microbial community. Water Res. 2016, 104, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chouari, R.; Le Paslier, D.; Daegelen, P.; Ginestet, P.; Weissenbach, J.; Sghir, A. Novel predominant archaeal and bacterial groups revealed by molecular analysis of an anaerobic sludge digester. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1104–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Whitman, W.B. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; Volume 410. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, K.S.; Ingram-Smith, C. Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen? Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Period | Day, Start-End | Description |
---|---|---|
P1 | 1–57 | Substrate CH-1 to all reactors. OLR gradually increased (Figure 1). Temperature increased from 32 to 37 °C over the first 5 days. |
P2 | 58–77 | 1A and 1B switched to substrate CH-DFE on day 58 and continued for the whole experiment. 2A and 2B continued with substrate CH-1. Average OLR of COD 5.4 g/L/d (SD 0.5) during days 59–77 for 1A and 1B, and days 58–67 for 2A and 2B. |
P3 | 78–130 | Starvation. OLR = 0 for all reactors. Temperature reduced stepwise to around 25 °C in the beginning of P3 and increased at the end of P3 to: 31 °C on day 118, 35 °C on day 125, and 37 °C on day 130. Bed height determined on day 117. |
P4 | 131–217 | The OLR was started at COD 2.3 g/L/d (SD 0.3) and thereafter changed, as illustrated in Figure 1. pH of substrate CH-1 adjusted to 7.1 (instead of 7.0) on day 143–160 and to pH 8.3 on day 161–177. Feeding terminated for 1A on day 211, 1B on day 217, 2A on day 173, and 2B on day 168. Average OLR 8.5 (SD 0.2) during days 183–201 for 1A and days 208–217 for 1B. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, T.; Schnürer, A.; Björkmalm, J.; Willquist, K.; Kreuger, E. Diversity and Abundance of Microbial Communities in UASB Reactors during Methane Production from Hydrolyzed Wheat Straw and Lucerne. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091394
Liu T, Schnürer A, Björkmalm J, Willquist K, Kreuger E. Diversity and Abundance of Microbial Communities in UASB Reactors during Methane Production from Hydrolyzed Wheat Straw and Lucerne. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(9):1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091394
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Tong, Anna Schnürer, Johanna Björkmalm, Karin Willquist, and Emma Kreuger. 2020. "Diversity and Abundance of Microbial Communities in UASB Reactors during Methane Production from Hydrolyzed Wheat Straw and Lucerne" Microorganisms 8, no. 9: 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091394