Next Article in Journal
Serra da Estrela PDO Cheese Microbiome as Revealed by Next Generation Sequencing
Next Article in Special Issue
Secreted Secondary Metabolites Reduce Bacterial Wilt Severity of Tomato in Bacterial–Fungal Co-Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges in Determining the Role of Microbiome Evolution in Barrett’s Esophagus and Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome Analysis of Streptomyces nojiriensis JCM 3382 and Distribution of Gene Clusters for Three Antibiotics and an Azasugar across the Genus Streptomyces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

6S-Like scr3559 RNA Affects Development and Antibiotic Production in Streptomyces coelicolor

1
Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Studničkova 7, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, České mládeže 8, 40096 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
3
Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(10), 2004; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102004
Submission received: 6 September 2021 / Revised: 15 September 2021 / Accepted: 16 September 2021 / Published: 22 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Secondary Metabolism of Microorganisms)

Abstract

:
Regulatory RNAs control a number of physiological processes in bacterial cells. Here we report on a 6S-like RNA transcript (scr3559) that affects both development and antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor. Its expression is enhanced during the transition to stationary phase. Strains that over-expressed the scr3559 gene region exhibited a shortened exponential growth phase in comparison with a control strain; accelerated aerial mycelium formation and spore maturation; alongside an elevated production of actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin. These observations were supported by LC-MS analyses of other produced metabolites, including: germicidins, desferrioxamines, and coelimycin. A subsequent microarray differential analysis revealed increased expression of genes associated with the described morphological and physiological changes. Structural and functional similarities between the scr3559 transcript and 6S RNA, and its possible employment in regulating secondary metabolite production are discussed.

1. Introduction

Streptomycetes are Gram-positive soil-dwelling bacteria. The soil niche represents a harsh living environment where the natural microbial inhabitants have evolved various nutrient-acquiring and life-defending strategies. Streptomyces have a complex developmental life cycle that begins with germinating spores. They then form branching vegetative hyphae that differentiate into aerial mycelium and spores again [1,2,3,4]. Moreover, the streptomycetes possess extraordinary genetic equipment for sensing extracellular signals and producing various specialized metabolites [5]. Among other applications, these molecules encompass over two-thirds of the clinically useful antibiotics and other compounds of industrial value [6]. The developmental complexity and antibiotic biosynthesis of these organisms require a complex regulatory network, which is responsible for addressing proper responses to changes in environmental conditions [7].
In order to achieve such responses, a number of pleiotropic regulators are involved in the gene expression control of the streptomycetes. So-called regulatory RNAs represent one such regulatory sphere. A single RNA molecule may regulate multiple genes, thus broadly influencing the physiology of the cell [8]. These RNAs act either simply by base-pairing with target nucleotides, or by binding target proteins via their secondary structures. 6S RNA achieves gene regulation using the second strategy and is one of the best studied regulatory RNAs in bacteria [9]. 6S RNA has a direct influence on the transition between developmental stages thanks to its direct association with the sigma70-RNA polymerase holoenzymes (RNAP-HrdB in Streptomyces). The formation of such complexes interferes with exponential phase-specific transcription [10,11,12]. Due to its function, the promoter-like secondary structure of 6S RNA is highly conserved across the bacterial kingdom. This high degree of conservation has enabled the identification of more than 100 potential 6S RNA homologues in diverse eubacterial species, using computational searches [13]. Notably, however, Streptomyces were absent among those species in which 6S RNA was identified.
We had developed a bioinformatic tool that detected two streptomycete 6S-like transcripts whose secondary structures exhibited convincing similarity with those of 6S RNAs found in other bacteria [14,15]. Subsequently, it was shown that a null mutation of one of these genes (scr3559), affected actinorhodin production in S. coelicolor [16]. To analyze the effect of the scr3559 RNA on cell morphology and physiology, we constructed a strain that over-expresses scr3559, with its gene placed under the control of a thiostrepton-inducible promoter. Interestingly, the levels of the scr3559 RNA were consistent with a strong effect on the exponential growth of S. coelicolor, as well as on its secondary metabolite production. This suggests that the scr3559 RNA functions as an important developmental regulator.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains, Media and Conditions of Cultivation

Streptomyces coelicolor M145 was used as a model wild type strain, as well as the parental strain used to construct a strain that over-expresses the scr3559 gene. The resulting S. coelicolor strains, Escherichia coli strains, and all plasmids/cosmids used in this study are summarized in Table 1.
E. coli strains were grown at 37 °C on solid agar and in LB liquid medium [17]. Streptomyces strains (108 spores) were grown at 30 °C on the solid agar media soya flour-mannitol (MS), supplemented minimal (SMMS) [18], and Oxoid Nutrient Agar (ONA, OXOID CZ s.r.o, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic) or in liquid rich with glucose, unless otherwise stated, media (R3) [19] or minimal NMMP [18].

2.2. Construction of High-Copy-Number Vector Overexpression Strains

The over-expression strain used in this study was constructed using the actinomycete high-copy-number shuttle vector pCJW93 (Table 1). The scr3559 gene from S. coelicolor was PCR amplified from cosmid StH5 (Table 1) using primers 6SO/E1 (GTGCGCGCCTGTCCGCGCTTG) and 6SO/E2 (GCCGATCGGTCGTCGGTTCGC), and the product was inserted into pIJ2925 (Table 1) using a rapid DNA ligation kit (Roche, Merck Life Science spol. s r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). The construct was transformed into DH5α E. coli cells (Table 1). The scr3559-containing fragment was cut out from the plasmid with BglII and subcloned into the BamHI site of the over-expression vector pCJW93, downstream from the thiostrepton-inducible (tipA) promoter. The plasmid was passaged through the non-methylating E. coli strain ET12567/pUZ8002 (Table 1) before being introduced into S. coelicolor M145 by conjugation [18], resulting in the construction of the C6S over-expression strain. A control strain, C0, containing the pCJW93 vector lacking any insert was constructed simultaneously.

2.3. Mapping of 5′ Ends

The 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′ RACE) was performed using the FirstChoice® RLM RACE kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic) with minor modifications, as described in [24]. Total RNA was extracted from a plasmid-free strain of S. coelicolor that had been cultivated for 72 h in NMMP liquid medium.
RNA quality was assessed by determining the RNA-integrity number (RIN) and only those samples with a RIN higher than 7 were further analyzed. Ten micrograms of RNA were treated with tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (TAP) before being ligated to a 5′ RACE adapter using T4 RNA ligase. The obtained product was used as template for reverse transcription using 50 µM of random decamers and M-MLV reverse transcriptase.
The resulting cDNA served as a template for 5′ end PCR amplification using an outer adaptor-specific oligonucleotide and an oligonucleotide complementary to the scr3559 RNA sequence (CGCTTACTCGGGACCGGT). The PCR product was used as a template for a second PCR reaction using an inner adaptor-specific oligonucleotide and an inner ‘nested’ scr3559 RNA-complementary primer (6SR; ACCGGTATACAAAGGACTCAACGG). The second PCR product was separated on an agarose gel and eluted using the QIAquick-Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, GeneTiCA s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). The purified products were cloned into the TOPO® vector using TOPO TA Cloning® (Invitrogen) and transformed into TOP10F competent cells (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was extracted from cells containing cDNA inserts using the QIAprep® Miniprep kit (Qiagen), and the cloned inserts were sequenced using M13 primers.

2.4. Differential Expression Analyses (Northern Blot)

At indicated time points of cultivation in the NMMP liquid medium (with thiostrepton supplemented at 50 µg/mL), cells were harvested and RNA was isolated as described in [25]. UV spectroscopy and agarose gel electrophoresis were used to assess the quantity and quality of total RNA samples. Total RNA samples were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and were transferred to nylon membranes (BioRad s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic) using a Trans-Blot semi-dry transfer cell (BioRad) (25 V, 4 °C overnight). The membrane was then UV-cross linked before being hybridized with the 5′-end-labeled oligonucleotide 6SR (ACCGGTAGTACAAAGGACTCAACGG), which corresponded to an internal segment of the scr3559 RNA. The hybridization was performed overnight at 42 °C in ULTRA hybridization buffer (Invitrogen). The detection and quantification of signals were conducted using a phosphorimager (BioRad).

2.5. Secondary Metabolite Production Assays

To quantify the actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin levels in the C6S strain relative to the C0 strain, 108 spores of each were inoculated into NMMP liquid medium (with thiostrepton supplemented at 50 µg/mL). Cultures were shaken at 30 °C and samples were taken after 48, 72, and 144 h (unless otherwise stated). Actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin levels were then quantified as described [26] and amounts were normalized per cell concentration.

2.6. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) Assay

Both C0 and C6S strains were cultivated for 48 h in R3 medium containing thiostrepton (50 µg/mL). Secondary metabolites were extracted from the culture supernatants using solid phase extraction [27,28]. LC-MS analyses were performed on the Acquity UPLC system with 2996 PDA detection system (194–600 nm) connected to LCT premier XE time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Waters Gesellschaft m.b.H., Prague, Czech Republic). Five microliters of the sample were loaded onto the Acquity UPLC BEH C18 LC column (50 mm × 2.1 mm I.D., particle size 1.7 μm, Waters) at 40 °C and eluted with a two-component mobile phase, A and B, consisting of 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile, respectively, at the flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1.
The analyses were performed under a linear gradient program (min/%B) 0/5; 1.5/5; 15/70; 18/99 followed by a 1.0-min column clean-up (99% B) and 1.5-min equilibration (5% B). The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive “W” mode with capillary voltage set at +2800 V, cone voltage +40 V, desolvation gas temperature, 350 °C; ion source block temperature, 120 °C; cone gas flow, 50 L h−1; desolvation gas flow, 800 L h−1; scan time of 0.15 s; inter-scan delay of 0.01 s. The mass accuracy was kept below 6 ppm using lock spray technology, with leucine enkephalin being used as the reference compound (2 ng μL−1, 5 μL min−1). MS chromatograms were extracted for [M + H]+ ions with the tolerance window of 0.03 Da, smoothed with a mean smoothing method (window size; 4 scans, number of smooths, 2). The data were processed by MassLynx V4.1 (Waters).

2.7. Microarrays

Cultivation of the C6S and control C0 strains was performed in duplicate. 108 spores were inoculated into NMMP liquid medium (with thiostrepton at 50 µg/mL) and shaken at 30 °C. Cells were harvested after 72 and 144 h and the quality of the isolated RNA samples was determined by their RIN. Only those samples whose RIN was >7 were sent to the Oxford Gene Technology Company (OGT, Oxford, United Kingdom), where microarray analysis was performed as follows: the RNA samples were used as template for reverse transcription using random hexamer primers and Cy3/Cy5 dyes (swapped in the duplicates); the labeled cDNAs were hybridized on microarray slides containing 4 × 44,000 spotted oligonucleotides, mapped preferentially to the ORFs of the S. coelicolor genome. The differential expression was estimated using the binary logarithm of the ratio of the expression level in the test C6S sample to the level of expression in the control C0 sample.

3. Results

3.1. Size and Gene Position of the scr3559 Transcript

The scr3559 RNA (also called Sc2 in [15] or 6S RNA in [16]) is a 192 nt long transcript that folds into a 6S-like secondary structure [16]. Its gene is located between SCO3558 and SCO3559. It is noteworthy that it is oriented downstream of SCO3559, as illustrated here in Figure 1 (minus strand) and is in accordance with the RNA sequence shown in both the above-mentioned publications, although the gene is mistakenly depicted in the opposite direction in Mikulík et al. [16], where it is dubbed ssrS.
To precisely map the scr3559 transcription start site, a RACE experiment was performed using internal nested primers complementary to the scr3559 RNA. Two RT-PCR products were detected and sequenced (Figure 2). These corresponded to a nascent (pre-scr3559 RNA) and a processed transcript (scr3559 RNA) of sizes 260 and 192 bases, respectively. The transcription start site is thus located at genome position 3934888, whereas the processed 6S-like form, as presented previously, begins at position 3934820. Based on these results, secondary structures of precursor (pre-scr3559 RNA), processed (scr3559 RNA) and excised transcripts were modeled using the RNAfold algorithm (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi, accessed on 1 September 2021) [29] (Figure 2b).

3.2. scr3559 RNA Expression Profiles (Northern Blotting)

scr3559 RNA levels were monitored throughout development for both the control C0 strain and the mutant C6S strain. Cells were cultivated in liquid NMMP medium and harvested after 12 h (early exponential phase of growth), 48 h (late exponential phase of growth) and 72 h of cultivation (stationary phase). No signal was detected in samples from the early exponential phase (not shown). A signal corresponding with pre-scr3559 RNA (260 nt) was detected only in the older cells of the C0 strain, whereas it is clearly seen in both developmental time points in the C6S over-expression strain (Figure 3). In both strains, the processed scr3559 RNA could only be detected during the exponential to stationary phase transition, when 6S RNA is expected to be active.

3.3. Phenotypic Analyses

After cultivation in NMMP medium with the selective antibiotic thiostrepton, the production of actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin metabolites were measured and normalized per cell concentration. The dry weight of the cells was estimated after they were collected in spin columns (Qiagen), centrifuged and washed with ethanol. Elevated antibiotic production, actinorhodin (blue) and undecylprodigiosin (red) were repeatedly detected in the C6S overexpression strain, compared with the C0 control strain (Figure 4).
When cultivated on solid agar plates containing thiostrepton (R2YE, SMMS, MS), the C6S strains revealed differences in morphology (small colonies, aberrant mycelium formation, less biomass, and more rapid sporulation compared to the C0 control), and exhibited increased production of secondary metabolites (mainly blue actinorhodin) (Figure 5a). This observation was supported by the data collected using electron microscopy to compare the morphology of C6S and C0 control strains grown in the presence of thiostrepton. The pictures clearly show the accelerated development of the aerial mycelium for the C6S strain (Figure 5b).
When cultivated on solid MS plates with apramycin and a gradient of thiostrepton, actinorhodin was visibly over-produced by the C6S strain only in the areas with higher concentrations of thiostrepton. In this area, growth of the C6S strain was slower, its cell density was lower and colonies were tiny and grey, suggesting that vegetative growth may be suppressed, and sporulation may be accelerated.
Growth in the area that did not contain thiostrepton (i.e., the tipA promoter is not induced and scr3559 is not overexpressed) looked similar to that of the C0 control strain, which did not show any phenotypic differences on the same thiostrepton gradient on MS medium. When cultivated on ONA medium with an equivalent thiostrepton gradient, the C6S strain produced visibly more actinorhodin throughout the entire plate. Only in the area with the highest thiostrepton concentrations, actinorhodin was overproduced in both strains. (Figure 6). This supports our assertion that overexpressing scr3559 (in response to thiostrepton induction) leads to profound phenotypic changes.

3.4. LC-MS Analysis of Other Metabolite Production

After both C6S and C0 strains had been cultivated for 48 h in R3 liquid medium, supernatants were subjected to LC-MS analysis. No qualitative changes were observed in the production of secondary metabolites, but quantitative differences were detected. Besides the already described increased production of actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin, other metabolites were detected in both strains. These include germicidins (A, B), desferrioxamines (B, E, G1), and coelimycin P1.

3.4.1. Germicidins

The LC-MS data qualitatively confirmed the presence of germicidin A (tR = 6.48 min) and germicidin B (tR = 5.91 min). The acquired m/z 197.1193 corresponded to the [M + H]+ of germicidin A with a theoretical m/z 197.1178. Based on a comparison of the area under the curve (AUC), six times higher production of germicidin A was observed in C6S (AUCC6S = 1252) compared with the C0 strain (AUCC0 = 206) (Figure 7). Germicidin B was also produced at higher levels in the C6S strain as well, although its levels were not as strikingly enhanced relative to that of germicidin A (AUCC6S = 336 and AUCC0 = 90). The acquired m/z 183.1031 corresponded to the [M + H]+ of germicidin B with a theoretical m/z 183.1021.

3.4.2. Desferrioxaomines

Desferrioxamine B was detected at tR = 3.14 min. The acquired m/z 561.3614 corresponded to the [M + H]+ of desferrioxamine B with a theoretical m/z 561.3625. The production of this metabolite during the cultivation in R3 with glucose was higher in C6S (AUCC6S = 173) than in C0 (AUCC0 = 110) (Figure 8). A similar trend was seen for the production of desferrioxamine E (AUCC6S = 208 vs. AUCC0 = 139) and G1 (AUCC6S = 34 vs. AUCC0 = 21). Desferrioxamine E was detected at tR = 4.72 min. The acquired m/z 601.3546 corresponded to the [M + H]+ of desferrioxamine E with a theoretical m/z 601.3561. Desferrioxamine G1 was also detected (tR = 3.28; m/z 619.3663), although the differences between the C6S and C0 strains were subtle.

3.4.3. Coelimycin P1

We also confirmed the presence of coelimycin P1 (tR = 7.48), an unusual polyketide alkaloid produced by S. coelicolor [30]. The acquired m/z 349.1222 corresponded to the [M + H]+ of coelimycin P1 with a theoretical m/z 349.1229. Traces of this substance were detected when culturing both strains in R3 liquid medium with glucose (AUCC6S = 21 vs. AUCC0 = 8) (Figure 9). However, when we used glycerol instead of glucose as an energy source in the R3 cultivation medium, the production of coelimycin was apparent only in the C6S strain (AUCC6S = 139).

3.5. Microarray Transcriptional Analysis

Microarray analysis was performed on C0 and C6S cells grown in liquid NMMP medium. Since previous expression analysis had shown higher levels of scr3559 RNA at later stages of growth, two stages of cell development were investigated: 72 h (younger cells), corresponding to early stationary phase (transition from exponential growth phase, when antibiotic production typically initiates) and 144 h (older cells), corresponding to late stationary stage. Genes that exhibited differential changes in expression are summarized in Table 2 and discussed below.

4. Discussion

The regulatory capabilities of small RNAs have only been appreciated for the last 20 years or so. This lack of awareness is exemplified in work by Nishiyama et al. [31], where the authors created a Streptomyces azureus strain that overexpressed the BalA1 region of the chromosome (a 2.5-kb chromosomal DNA fragment). The resulting BalA1 strain formed little aerial hyphae and exhibited a capacity to overproduce secondary metabolites. The authors focused on the fact that the equivalent chromosomal region in the S. coelicolor genome contains two protein-coding genes: SCO3557 and SCO3558. They referred to SCO3558 as encoding a “morphological differentiation-associated protein”. Subsequent work [14,24,32] has revealed, however, that the SCO3558 gene is flanked by two sRNA-coding genes scr3558 (encoding 6C RNA) [24,33] and by the scr3559 (investigated here) (Figure 1). Expression of both scr3558 and scr3559 RNAs has been verified. Mutagenesis of the scr3558 gene had no effect on cell physiology (personal communication [34]), whereas deletion [16] and/or overproduction of the scr3559 RNA (our C6S strain) led to changes in morphological development and secondary metabolite production. The phenotypes in this study are reminiscent of those described for the S. azureus BalA1 strain, where the scr3559-equivalent RNA could be responsible for the observed change in cell physiology following overexpression of the sRNA region.
One may speculate that the BalA1 phenotype could be caused by increased expression of other gene product(s) from the BalA1 locus, including SCO3558 or SCO3559. The SCO3558 gene is a possible paralogue of the mmfP gene, which is located in a cluster of genes encoding enzymes responsible for the synthesis of the methylenomycin furans (MMFs) from the SCP1 plasmid of S. coelicolor [35]. These MMFs are freely diffusible signaling molecules that control the expression of the plasmid-encoded antibiotic methylenomycin. Nishiyama et al. also demonstrated that the S. azureus BalA1 strain induced its neighboring S. coelicolor A3(2) to produce the red antibiotic undecylprodigiosin early on in its life cycle. We therefore speculated that the scr3559 RNA in S. coelicolor may also contribute to the control of signaling molecule(s). However, we did not see any influence of the C6S strain on the development of the neighboring C0 strain, as was observed in the BalA1 strain. It is not yet clear whether either of the flanking protein-coding genes (SCO3558 and SCO3559), contribute to Streptomyces development, as their expression decreased in the C6S strain according to our microarray data.
The results presented here indicate that sRNAs contribute to the control of antibiotic production in Streptomyces species. Several pioneering studies on specific small RNAs expressed in Streptomyces have been published [36,37,38]. Subsequent bioinformatic approaches have predicted that tens of sRNA transcripts might be expressed during the developmental cycle of S. coelicolor [14,24,25,32,39,40]. The scr3559 RNA, whose pleiotropic phenotypic effects are described here, was first detected by Panek [14]. Further study revealed that the transcript’s secondary structure is reminiscent of the well-characterized 6S RNA [15]. Binding assays confirmed that scr3559 can form a complex with RNAP-HrdB and an analysis of its secondary structure validated these earlier predictions [16].
As we found here, two forms of scr3559 RNA are produced: a longer 260 nt-long molecule referred to here as pre-scr3559, and a shorter 192 nt-long “processed” form. 6S RNA processing has been studied in E. coli and other proteobacteria, where two precursor transcripts (transcribed from different promoters) are processed to give a mature 183 nt 6S RNA [41]. RNase E and its paralogue RNase G are required for this processing [41]. A similar situation has been noted in Bacillus thuringiensis, where two genes, ssrSA and ssrSB, are co-transcribed and processed by ribonucleases to give a functional 6S RNA [42]. It would be expected that equivalent RNases may contribute to the processing of the 6S RNA in S. coelicolor (Figure 2b); however, this has not yet been explored experimentally. It is also not known whether both precursor and processed-6S RNAs are functional, or whether functionality is confined to the processed form.
Interestingly, a deep sequencing analysis of S. coelicolor transcriptome detected a transcript antisense to the scr3559 RNA which is also expressed in the early stationary phase of cell development [32]. We believe that this could be a transcript equivalent to Ms1 RNA found in Mycobacterium smegmatis where it is positioned in the same antisense orientation [15,43]. Ms1 RNA accumulates in stationary phase and forms a 6S-like secondary structure [44]. Therefore, Ms1 RNA has been proposed to be the mycobacterial 6S RNA. It was however later demonstrated that Ms1 does not bind to the primary σ70-factor-RNAP complex, and instead forms a complex with the RNAP core that is devoid of the sigma factor [44]. This promotes increased sigma-free core RNA polymerase levels, leading to a reservoir of RNAP in stationary phase [45]. Further research is needed in order to elucidate the roles of both the 6S-like scr3559 RNA and its antisense Ms1-like transcript.
6S RNA levels are at their maximum during stationary phase in many bacteria [46]. In E. coli, 6S RNA levels increase up to 11 times in stationary phase compared to exponential phase [47], and the transcript effectively sequesters the majority of σ70 and upregulates σS synthesis [46,48,49]. This promotes optimal cell survival, promoting sigma factor switching by the transcriptional machinery and leading to different transcriptional outcomes. This allows the bacteria to better adapt to and survive various stress conditions including nutrient limitation, and prolongs cell viability when compared with 6S RNA-deficient strains [46].
Bacillus subtilis is slightly more complex, as it expresses two 6S RNAs: 6S-1 RNA and 6S-2 RNA. Whereas 6S-1 RNA exhibits a similar expression profile to the E. coli 6S RNA, 6S-2 RNA’s expression is steady throughout the cell cycle [13,50,51,52]. Interestingly, 6S-1 RNA impacts the timing of sporulation [53]. A strain of B. thuringiensis lacking 6S-1 RNA also exhibited a reduced capacity to survive stationary phase and was defective in spore formation [42]. 6S RNA has also been observed to mediate transition into a dormant state in Coxiella burnetii, an obligate intracellular pathogen. The cellular level of 6S RNA in this bacterium peaks after developmental differentiation into a spore-like small cell variant [54].
These findings are all consistent with our observations in Streptomyces. As we have shown, scr3559 RNA levels increase during the transition into stationary phase, and culminate with onset of antibiotic production. When scr3559 expression was induced by thiostrepton, the C6S strain was observed to promote rapid entry into stationary phase. On solid media, this resulted in the formation of very small, precociously sporulating colonies (Figure 5).
These observations correlated with our microarray analyses, where we observed increased transcript levels for genes whose products drive aerial hyphae development, septation and sporulation in the C6S strain. Although some streptomycete strains, like S. coelicolor, do not develop aerial mycelium and spores in liquid media, transcriptomic data suggest that gene expression in liquid and solid cultures are comparable [55]. A comparative transcriptomic study revealed that 86% of genes are expressed at the same level in both liquid and solid media, including genes involved in sporulation (bldN, sapA, and whiG, among others) [55].
The alternative BldN-sigma factor of RNAP is required for aerial mycelium formation and subsequent sporulation [56]. As our microarray data show, transcript levels of this developmental regulator in the C6S strain exhibited an almost four-fold increase in younger cells (72 h) and an approximate two and a half fold increase in older cultures (144 h) compared with the control strain C0.
Early stages of sporulation are regulated by WhiG, another alternative sigma factor of RNAP [57]. Its regulon members include whiH, which encodes a sporulation transcription factor [58,59,60]. WhiH is required for the process of aerial hyphae septation; only a few sporulation septa are formed in loosely coiled aerial hyphae when this GntR-family transcription factor is missing [58]. whiH also activates the expression of geoA, a gene encoding an enzyme responsible for the synthesis of the earthy volatile compound geosmin [61]. The expression of whiH and whiG genes was doubled and tripled, respectively, in the older C6S strain. Also upregulated in C6S was the expression of the spore-associated protein SapA-encoding gene, whose synthesis is also connected with the aerial hyphae development [62,63].
Morphological development during stationary phase is accompanied by increased secondary metabolism; this was even more active when high levels of scr3559 RNA were produced. One explanation for this could be through elevated levels of the γ-butyrolactone bacterial hormones. These molecules are responsible for cell signaling, coordinating morphological changes, and triggering the onset of secondary metabolism during stationary phase [64,65]. The synthesis of the S. coelicolor butanolide (SCB; an equivalent molecule to A-factor in S. griseus) is directed by the γ-butyrolactone synthase ScbA [66]. SCB is sensed by the receptor protein ScbR, whose repression of biosynthetic gene clusters is then relieved. Our microarray data show that in the young C6S strain, expression of scbA is upregulated, while expression of scbR is reduced. Two other genetic loci, whose expression is known to activate antibiotic production in S. coelicolor (the Abe cluster [67] and AbsR [68]), were also upregulated in the younger C6S strain. These activation events may contribute to the increased production of antibiotics.
Other than actinorhodin, the C6S strain produced the undecylprodigiosin (red) antibiotic earlier in its life cycle and in higher concentrations than the control C0 strain. Prodiginines are membrane damaging molecules that are produced inside the substrate mycelia cells in nutrient-deficient conditions. Lacking any self-resistance gene, they may contribute to a programmed cell death process that supports aerial hyphae development [69]. The “red” biosynthetic pathway is activated by the RedD regulator, whose gene expression is upregulated (doubled to tripled) during the development of the C6S strain. This occurs in concert with reduced growth of vegetative hyphae of the C6S strain observed here (Figure 5).
Other upregulated secondary metabolite gene clusters in the C6S strain include crtEIBV and crtYTU (in older cells), which are associated with the carotenoid isorenieratene synthesis pathway [70] and the Gcs type III polyketide (germicidins) [71], respectively. The expression of the Gcs gene SCO7221 was tripled in older C6S cells, in accordance with the elevated germicidin levels observed in our LC-MS analysis (Figure 7). Germicidin A inhibits not only spore germination, but also vegetative hyphae elongation [72]. Thus, the germicidins may therefore contribute—possibly in association with the prodiginines—to the sporulation process supported by the scr3559 RNA.

5. Conclusions

The phenotypic observations presented here imply that scr3559 RNA plays a central role in the developmental control mechanisms of Streptomyces bacteria. The similarities shared by scr3559 RNA and bacterial 6S RNAs [16] may explain its pleiotropic effects on development and secondary metabolism. 6S RNA in Streptomyces may function to sequester exponential phase-specific HrdB-RNAP in order to effectively promote entry into stationary phase, leading to the formation of spores. As this development is accompanied by increased activity of secondary metabolism, the 6S RNA role also appears to include an impact on antibiotic production, given the elevated levels observed in the C6S over-expression strain.

Author Contributions

J.B. conceptualized the project, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the original manuscript; A.M. performed cultivations and antibiotic production measurements; D.Š. performed northern blot experiments; M.E. assisted in the design and preparation of experiments, data interpretation, and writing the manuscript; M.Č. performed LC-MS measurements and data analyses. All of the authors proofread the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project No.: UJEP-SGS-2020-53-002-2 was supported by grant within student grant competition at UJEP, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem. This research was funded by Charles University, grant PROGRES Q25/LF1 and SVV260520, and by an NSERC Discovery grant (No. 04681) to M.E.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Oldřich Benada and to Olga Kofroňová for electron microscopic pictures. We thank Karel Mikulík in memoriam for his lifelong research work and training of the next generation of scientists.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kelemen, G.H.; Buttner, M.J. Initiation of aerial mycelium formation in Streptomyces. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998, 1, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Flardh, K.; Buttner, M.J. Streptomyces morphogenetics: Dissecting differentiation in a filamentous bacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Flardh, K.; Richards, D.M.; Hempel, A.M.; Howard, M.; Buttner, M.J. Regulation of apical growth and hyphal branching in Streptomyces. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bobek, J.; Strakova, E.; Zikova, A.; Vohradsky, J. Changes in activity of metabolic and regulatory pathways during germination of S. coelicolor. BMC Genomics 2014, 15, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. McCormick, J.R.; Flardh, K. Signals and regulators that govern Streptomyces development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 206–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hopwood, D.A. Forty years of genetics with Streptomyces: From in vivo through in vitro to in silico. Microbiology 1999, 145 Pt 9, 2183–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Claessen, D.; de Jong, W.; Dijkhuizen, L.; Wosten, H.A. Regulation of Streptomyces development: Reach for the sky! Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Majdalani, N.; Vanderpool, C.K.; Gottesman, S. Bacterial small RNA regulators. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 40, 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wassarman, K.M. 6S RNA, a global regulator of transcription. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gildehaus, N.; Neusser, T.; Wurm, R.; Wagner, R. Studies on the function of the riboregulator 6S RNA from E. coli: RNA polymerase binding, inhibition of in vitro transcription and synthesis of RNA-directed de novo transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 1885–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wassarman, K.M.; Saecker, R.M. Synthesis-mediated release of a small RNA inhibitor of RNA polymerase. Science 2006, 314, 1601–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Willkomm, D.K.; Minnerup, J.; Huttenhofer, A.; Hartmann, R.K. Experimental rnomics in aquifex aeolicus: Identification of small non-coding RNAs and the putative 6S RNA homolog. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 1949–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Barrick, J.E.; Sudarsan, N.; Weinberg, Z.; Ruzzo, W.L.; Breaker, R.R. 6S RNA is a widespread regulator of eubacterial RNA polymerase that resembles an open promoter. RNA 2005, 11, 774–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Panek, J.; Bobek, J.; Mikulik, K.; Basler, M.; Vohradsky, J. Biocomputational prediction of small non-coding RNAs in Streptomyces. BMC Genomics 2008, 9, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Panek, J.; Krasny, L.; Bobek, J.; Jezkova, E.; Korelusova, J.; Vohradsky, J. The suboptimal structures find the optimal RNAs: Homology search for bacterial non-coding RNAs using suboptimal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 3418–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mikulik, K.; Bobek, J.; Zidkova, J.; Felsberg, J. 6S RNA modulates growth and antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 7185–7197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sambrook, J.R.; Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2001; p. A2.2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kieser, T.; Bibb, M.J.; Buttner, M.J.; Chater, K.F.; Hopwood, D.A. Practical Streptomyces Genetics, 2nd ed.; John Innes Foundation: Norwich, UK, 2000; ISBN 0-7084-0623-8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shima, J.; Hesketh, A.; Okamoto, S.; Kawamoto, S.; Ochi, K. Induction of actinorhodin production by rpsl (encoding ribosomal protein s12) mutations that confer streptomycin resistance in Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 7276–7284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. MacNeil, D.J.; Occi, J.L.; Gewain, K.M.; MacNeil, T.; Gibbons, P.H.; Ruby, C.L.; Danis, S.J. Complex organization of the Streptomyces avermitilis genes encoding the avermectin polyketide synthase. Gene 1992, 115, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Janssen, G.R.; Bibb, M.J. Derivatives of pUC18 that have BglII sites flanking a modified multiple cloning site and that retain the ability to identify recombinant clones by visual screening of Escherichia coli colonies. Gene 1993, 124, 133–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wilkinson, C.J.; Hughes-Thomas, Z.A.; Martin, C.J.; Bohm, I.; Mironenko, T.; Deacon, M.; Wheatcroft, M.; Wirtz, G.; Staunton, J.; Leadlay, P.F. Increasing the efficiency of heterologous promoters in actinomycetes. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 4, 417–426. [Google Scholar]
  23. Redenbach, M.; Kieser, H.M.; Denapaite, D.; Eichner, A.; Cullum, J.; Kinashi, H.; Hopwood, D.A. A set of ordered cosmids and a detailed genetic and physical map for the 8 Mb Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 1996, 21, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Swiercz, J.P.; Bobek, J.; Haiser, H.J.; Di Berardo, C.; Tjaden, B.; Elliot, M.A. Small non-coding RNAs in Streptomyces coelicolor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 7240–7251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Setinova, D.; Smidova, K.; Pohl, P.; Music, I.; Bobek, J. RNase III-binding-mRNAs revealed novel complementary transcripts in Streptomyces. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kang, S.G.; Jin, W.; Bibb, M.; Lee, K.J. Actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin production in wild-type and relA mutant strains of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) grown in continuous culture. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 168, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cihak, M.; Kamenik, Z.; Smidova, K.; Bergman, N.; Benada, O.; Kofronova, O.; Petrickova, K.; Bobek, J. Secondary metabolites produced during the germination of Streptomyces coelicolor. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kamenik, Z.; Hadacek, F.; Mareckova, M.; Ulanova, D.; Kopecky, J.; Chobot, V.; Plhackova, K.; Olsovska, J. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography fingerprinting method for chemical screening of metabolites in cultivation broth. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 8016–8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gruber, A.R.; Lorenz, R.; Bernhart, S.H.; Neubock, R.; Hofacker, I.L. The Vienna RNA websuite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W70–W74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gomez-Escribano, J.P.; Bibb, M.J. Streptomyces coelicolor as an expression host for heterologous gene clusters. Methods Enzymol. 2012, 517, 279–300. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nishiyama, T.; Sakemi, H.; Sumi, H.; Tokunaga, S.; Doi, K.; Ogata, S. A chromosomal locus encoding a phosphoserine phosphatase- and a truncated mind-like protein affects differentiation in Streptomyces azureus ATCC14921. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 190, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vockenhuber, M.P.; Sharma, C.M.; Statt, M.G.; Schmidt, D.; Xu, Z.; Dietrich, S.; Liesegang, H.; Mathews, D.H.; Suess, B. Deep sequencing-based identification of small non-coding RNAs in Streptomyces coelicolor. RNA Biol. 2011, 8, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Mai, J.; Rao, C.; Watt, J.; Sun, X.; Lin, C.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis 6C sRNA binds multiple mRNA targets via C-rich loops independent of RNA chaperones. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 4292–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Swiercz, J.P.; Elliot, M.A. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Unpublished work. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  35. Corre, C.; Song, L.; O’Rourke, S.; Chater, K.F.; Challis, G.L. 2-alkyl-4-hydroxymethylfuran-3-carboxylic acids, antibiotic production inducers discovered by Streptomyces coelicolor genome mining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17510–17515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Paleckova, P.; Bobek, J.; Felsberg, J.; Mikulik, K. Activity of translation system and abundance of tmRNA during development of Streptomyces aureofaciens producing tetracycline. Folia Microbiol. 2006, 51, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mikulik, K.; Paleckova, P.; Felsberg, J.; Bobek, J.; Zidkova, J.; Halada, P. SsrA genes of streptomycetes and association of proteins to the tmRNA during development and cellular differentiation. Proteomics 2008, 8, 1429–1441. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Engel, F.; Ossipova, E.; Jakobsson, P.J.; Vockenhuber, M.P.; Suess, B. sRNA scr5239 involved in feedback loop regulation of Streptomyces coelicolor central metabolism. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moody, M.J.; Young, R.A.; Jones, S.E.; Elliot, M.A. Comparative analysis of non-coding RNAs in the antibiotic-producing Streptomyces bacteria. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yi, J.S.; Kim, M.W.; Kim, M.; Jeong, Y.; Kim, E.J.; Cho, B.K.; Kim, B.G. A novel approach for gene expression optimization through native promoter and 5′ UTR combinations based on RNA-seq, Ribo-seq, and TSS-seq of Streptomyces coelicolor. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017, 6, 555–565. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim, K.S.; Lee, Y. Regulation of 6S RNA biogenesis by switching utilization of both sigma factors and endoribonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 6057–6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, Z.; Zhu, L.; Yu, Z.; Liu, L.; Chou, S.H.; Wang, J.; He, J. 6S-1 RNA contributes to sporulation and parasporal crystal formation in Bacillus thuringiensis. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 604458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Behra, P.R.K.; Pettersson, B.M.F.; Das, S.; Dasgupta, S.; Kirsebom, L.A. Comparative genomics of Mycobacterium mucogenicum and Mycobacterium neoaurum clade members emphasizing tRNA and non-coding RNA. BMC Evol. Biol. 2019, 19, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hnilicova, J.; Jirat Matejckova, J.; Sikova, M.; Pospisil, J.; Halada, P.; Panek, J.; Krasny, L. Ms1, a novel sRNA interacting with the RNA polymerase core in mycobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 11763–11776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sikova, M.; Janouskova, M.; Ramaniuk, O.; Palenikova, P.; Pospisil, J.; Bartl, P.; Suder, A.; Pajer, P.; Kubickova, P.; Pavlis, O.; et al. Ms1 RNA increases the amount of RNA polymerase in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 111, 354–372. [Google Scholar]
  46. Trotochaud, A.E.; Wassarman, K.M. 6S RNA function enhances long-term cell survival. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 4978–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wassarman, K.M.; Storz, G. 6S RNA regulates E. coli RNA polymerase activity. Cell 2000, 101, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cavanagh, A.T.; Klocko, A.D.; Liu, X.; Wassarman, K.M. Promoter specificity for 6S RNA regulation of transcription is determined by core promoter sequences and competition for region 4.2 of sigma70. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 67, 1242–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Neusser, T.; Polen, T.; Geissen, R.; Wagner, R. Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ando, Y.; Asari, S.; Suzuma, S.; Yamane, K.; Nakamura, K. Expression of a small RNA, bs203 RNA, from the yocI-yocJ intergenic region of Bacillus subtilis genome. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 207, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Beckmann, B.M.; Burenina, O.Y.; Hoch, P.G.; Kubareva, E.A.; Sharma, C.M.; Hartmann, R.K. In vivo and in vitro analysis of 6S RNA-templated short transcripts in Bacillus subtilis. RNA Biol. 2011, 8, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Suzuma, S.; Asari, S.; Bunai, K.; Yoshino, K.; Ando, Y.; Kakeshita, H.; Fujita, M.; Nakamura, K.; Yamane, K. Identification and characterization of novel small RNAs in the aspS-yrvM intergenic region of the Bacillus subtilis genome. Microbiology 2002, 148, 2591–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Cavanagh, A.T.; Wassarman, K.M. 6S-1 RNA function leads to a delay in sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 2079–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Warrier, I.; Hicks, L.D.; Battisti, J.M.; Raghavan, R.; Minnick, M.F. Identification of novel small RNAs and characterization of the 6S RNA of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100147. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yague, P.; Rodriguez-Garcia, A.; Lopez-Garcia, M.T.; Rioseras, B.; Martin, J.F.; Sanchez, J.; Manteca, A. Transcriptomic analysis of liquid non-sporulating Streptomyces coelicolor cultures demonstrates the existence of a complex differentiation comparable to that occurring in solid sporulating cultures. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Bibb, M.J.; Molle, V.; Buttner, M.J. Sigma(BldN), an extracytoplasmic function RNA polymerase sigma factor required for aerial mycelium formation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 4606–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Mendez, C.; Chater, K.F. Cloning of whiG, a gene critical for sporulation of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Bacteriol. 1987, 169, 5715–5720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Flardh, K.; Findlay, K.C.; Chater, K.F. Association of early sporulation genes with suggested developmental decision points in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Microbiology 1999, 145 Pt 9, 2229–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chater, K.F. Multilevel regulation of Streptomyces differentiation. Trends Genet. 1989, 5, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ryding, N.J.; Kelemen, G.H.; Whatling, C.A.; Flardh, K.; Buttner, M.J.; Chater, K.F. A developmentally regulated gene encoding a repressor-like protein is essential for sporulation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 29, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Becher, P.G.; Verschut, V.; Bibb, M.J.; Bush, M.J.; Molnar, B.P.; Barane, E.; Al-Bassam, M.M.; Chandra, G.; Song, L.; Challis, G.L.; et al. Developmentally regulated volatiles geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol attract a soil arthropod to Streptomyces bacteria promoting spore dispersal. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Guijarro, J.; Santamaria, R.; Schauer, A.; Losick, R. Promoter determining the timing and spatial localization of transcription of a cloned Streptomyces coelicolor gene encoding a spore-associated polypeptide. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 1895–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Willey, J.; Santamaria, R.; Guijarro, J.; Geistlich, M.; Losick, R. Extracellular complementation of a developmental mutation implicates a small sporulation protein in aerial mycelium formation by S. coelicolor. Cell 1991, 65, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Khokhlov, A.S.; Tovarova, I.I.; Borisova, L.N.; Pliner, S.A.; Shevchenko, L.N.; Kornitskaia, E.; Ivkina, N.S.; Rapoport, I.A. [The a-factor, responsible for streptomycin biosynthesis by mutant strains of actinomyces streptomycini]. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 1967, 177, 232–235. [Google Scholar]
  65. Takano, E. Gamma-butyrolactones: Streptomyces signalling molecules regulating antibiotic production and differentiation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006, 9, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kato, J.Y.; Funa, N.; Watanabe, H.; Ohnishi, Y.; Horinouchi, S. Biosynthesis of gamma-butyrolactone autoregulators that switch on secondary metabolism and morphological development in Streptomyces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2378–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Hindra; Pak, P.; Elliot, M.A. Regulation of a novel gene cluster involved in secondary metabolite production in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 4973–4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Park, U.M.; Suh, J.W.; Hong, S.K. Genetic analysis of absR, a new abs locus of Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 10, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  69. Tenconi, E.; Traxler, M.F.; Hoebreck, C.; van Wezel, G.P.; Rigali, S. Production of prodiginines is part of a programmed cell death process in Streptomyces coelicolor. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Takano, H.; Obitsu, S.; Beppu, T.; Ueda, K. Light-induced carotenogenesis in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): Identification of an extracytoplasmic function sigma factor that directs photodependent transcription of the carotenoid biosynthesis gene cluster. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 1825–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Song, L.; Barona-Gomez, F.; Corre, C.; Xiang, L.; Udwary, D.W.; Austin, M.B.; Noel, J.P.; Moore, B.S.; Challis, G.L. Type III polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl-acp starter unit and ethylmalonyl-coa extender unit selectivity discovered by Streptomyces coelicolor genome mining. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14754–14755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Aoki, Y.; Matsumoto, D.; Kawaide, H.; Natsume, M. Physiological role of germicidins in spore germination and hyphal elongation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Revised scr3559 gene orientation, relative to its flanking genes.
Figure 1. Revised scr3559 gene orientation, relative to its flanking genes.
Microorganisms 09 02004 g001
Figure 2. (a) 5′ RACE analysis. From the left: lanes 1–3 PCR products from the RACE experiment, taken from 72, 144, and 168-h-old cultures; lanes 4–5 RTase-free and ligase-free negative controls (no signals). The arrows point to those PCR products whose sequences correspond to the nascent scr3559 RNA (260 bases) and to the processed form (192 bases). The molecular sizes of the RACE-generated PCR products roughly corresponded to the sizes of the whole transcripts. (b) Secondary structure predictions for the 260 nt pre-scr3559 RNA, a processed 192 nt form and the excised 68 nt transcript. The structures were modeled using RNAfold software with energy parameters scaled to 30 °C. The scissors mark the predicted site of cleavage in the precursor transcript. The green and blue clouds indicate the 5′ and 3′ ends of scr3559 RNA, respectively.
Figure 2. (a) 5′ RACE analysis. From the left: lanes 1–3 PCR products from the RACE experiment, taken from 72, 144, and 168-h-old cultures; lanes 4–5 RTase-free and ligase-free negative controls (no signals). The arrows point to those PCR products whose sequences correspond to the nascent scr3559 RNA (260 bases) and to the processed form (192 bases). The molecular sizes of the RACE-generated PCR products roughly corresponded to the sizes of the whole transcripts. (b) Secondary structure predictions for the 260 nt pre-scr3559 RNA, a processed 192 nt form and the excised 68 nt transcript. The structures were modeled using RNAfold software with energy parameters scaled to 30 °C. The scissors mark the predicted site of cleavage in the precursor transcript. The green and blue clouds indicate the 5′ and 3′ ends of scr3559 RNA, respectively.
Microorganisms 09 02004 g002
Figure 3. Northern blot analysis of scr3559 RNA levels in C0 and C6S strain. The product at about 250 nt likely corresponds to the pre-scr3559 RNA. The processed scr3559 RNA (192 nt) could be seen only in 48 h-old cells of both C0 and C6S strains.
Figure 3. Northern blot analysis of scr3559 RNA levels in C0 and C6S strain. The product at about 250 nt likely corresponds to the pre-scr3559 RNA. The processed scr3559 RNA (192 nt) could be seen only in 48 h-old cells of both C0 and C6S strains.
Microorganisms 09 02004 g003
Figure 4. Liquid culture phenotypes: (a) The C0 control (left) and C6S (right) strains after 72 h of cultivation in NMMP liquid medium. (b) Comparison of actinorhodin production in C0 and C6S strains; the y-axis indicates absorbance at A640 ×100 and normalized per cell concentration. The error bars represent a confidence interval from at least four independent biological replicates (α = 0.2). (c) Comparison of undecylprodigiosin production in C0 and C6S strains; the y-axis indicates absorbance at A530 × 100 and normalized per cell concentration. The error bars represent a confidence interval from at least three independent biological replicates (α = 0.2).
Figure 4. Liquid culture phenotypes: (a) The C0 control (left) and C6S (right) strains after 72 h of cultivation in NMMP liquid medium. (b) Comparison of actinorhodin production in C0 and C6S strains; the y-axis indicates absorbance at A640 ×100 and normalized per cell concentration. The error bars represent a confidence interval from at least four independent biological replicates (α = 0.2). (c) Comparison of undecylprodigiosin production in C0 and C6S strains; the y-axis indicates absorbance at A530 × 100 and normalized per cell concentration. The error bars represent a confidence interval from at least three independent biological replicates (α = 0.2).
Microorganisms 09 02004 g004
Figure 5. Solid culture phenotypes: (a) The C6S (left) and C0 control (right) strains after 120 h of cultivation on MS medium. (b) Electron-micrographs of mycelia from the C6S (left) and C0 (right) strains after 120 h of cultivation on solid MS medium.
Figure 5. Solid culture phenotypes: (a) The C6S (left) and C0 control (right) strains after 120 h of cultivation on MS medium. (b) Electron-micrographs of mycelia from the C6S (left) and C0 (right) strains after 120 h of cultivation on solid MS medium.
Microorganisms 09 02004 g005
Figure 6. The C6S and C0 strains on MS and ONA medium with a linear concentration gradient of thiostrepton (0–25 μL mL−1 respectively to the blue wedge shown to the right of the plates) after 120 h of cultivation. The dashed line indicates where the thiostrepton gradient begins (most concentrated area is at the top of the image).
Figure 6. The C6S and C0 strains on MS and ONA medium with a linear concentration gradient of thiostrepton (0–25 μL mL−1 respectively to the blue wedge shown to the right of the plates) after 120 h of cultivation. The dashed line indicates where the thiostrepton gradient begins (most concentrated area is at the top of the image).
Microorganisms 09 02004 g006
Figure 7. Extracted LC-MS chromatograms of germicidin A produced by S. coelicolor C6S and C0 after 48 h of cultivation in R3 medium.
Figure 7. Extracted LC-MS chromatograms of germicidin A produced by S. coelicolor C6S and C0 after 48 h of cultivation in R3 medium.
Microorganisms 09 02004 g007
Figure 8. Extracted LC-MS chromatograms of desferrioxamine B produced by S. coelicolor C6S and C0 after 48 h of cultivation in R3 medium.
Figure 8. Extracted LC-MS chromatograms of desferrioxamine B produced by S. coelicolor C6S and C0 after 48 h of cultivation in R3 medium.
Microorganisms 09 02004 g008
Figure 9. Extracted LC-MS chromatograms of coelimycin P1 produced by S. coelicolor C6S and C0 after 48 h of cultivation in R3 medium with glucose or glycerol.
Figure 9. Extracted LC-MS chromatograms of coelimycin P1 produced by S. coelicolor C6S and C0 after 48 h of cultivation in R3 medium with glucose or glycerol.
Microorganisms 09 02004 g009
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.
Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.
Strain or PlasmidGenotype, Description or UseReference or Source
S. coelicolor
M145SCP1− SCP2−[18]
C6Sscr3559 over-expression: in order to be expressed from the tipA promoter, the scr3559 gene was cloned into the high copy number plasmid pCJW93.This work
C0a control strain containing an empty pCJW93 vectorThis work
E. coli
DH5αPlasmid construction and general subcloningInvitrogen
ET12567/pUZ8002Generation of methylation-free plasmid DNA and conjugation from E. coli into S. coelicolor[20]
Plasmids/cosmids
pIJ2925General cloning vector[21]
pCJW93High-copy-number E. coli/Streptomyces plasmid containing a thiostrepton inducible (tipA) promoter[22]
StH5S. coelicolor cosmid containing the scr3559 gene[23]
Table 2. Color heat map represents the range of gene expression change in the C6S strain relative to the C0 strain from most down-regulated (dark purple) to most up-regulated (dark maroon) genes.
Table 2. Color heat map represents the range of gene expression change in the C6S strain relative to the C0 strain from most down-regulated (dark purple) to most up-regulated (dark maroon) genes.
Gene SCO NumberAverage Differential Expression (C6S/C0)Gene/Cosmid NameProtein/Gene Cluster
Young Cells (72 h)Old Cells (144 h)
185−2.713.66crtB/SCJ1.34putative geranyl pyrophosphate synthase/Isorenieratene
186−0.151.85crtE/SCJ1.35putative phytoene dehydrogenase (putative secreted protein)/Isorenieratene
187−0.822.53crtI/SCJ1.36putative phytoene synthase/Isorenieratene
188−0.411.52crtV/SCJ1.37putative methylesterase/Isorenieratene
189−0.841.14crtU/SCJ1.38cputative dehydrogenase/Isorenieratene
1900.021.20crtT/SCJ12.02cIsorenieratene
191−0.761.11crtY/SCJ12.03cIsorenieratene
216−1.272.72narG2nitrate reductase alpha chain NarG2
217−1.612.69narH2nitrate reductase beta chain NarH2
3791.491.05katA/EC 1.11.1.6catalase KatA
3800.912.10SCF62.06conserved hypothetical protein
3812.372.30SCF62.07putative glycosyl transferase
3823.140.82SCF62.08UDP-glucose/GDP-mannose family dehydrogenase
3832.241.66SCF62.09hypothetical protein
3842.011.58SCF62.10putative membrane protein
3851.741.23SCF62.11putative membrane protein
4091.771.14sapA/SCF51.08cspore-associated protein precursor
489−3.72−6.22SCF34.08cconserved hypothetical protein/Siderophore coelichelin
490−2.18−3.35SCF34.09cputative esterase/Siderophore coelichelin
491−1.57−3.33SCF34.10cputative ABC transporter transmembrane protein/Siderophore coelichelin
492−0.88−3.73SCF34.11cputative peptide synthetase/Siderophore coelichelin
493−1.66−4.03SCF34.12cputative ABC-transporter transmembrane protein/Siderophore coelichelin
494−2.85−4.16SCF34.13cputative iron-siderophore binding lipoprotein/Siderophore coelichelin
495−1.32−1.66SCF34.14cputative iron-siderophore ABC-transporter ATP-binding protein/Siderophore coelichelin
4960.61−2.29SCF34.15cputative iron-siderophore permease transmembrane protein/Siderophore coelichelin
497−0.40−2.20SCF34.16cputative iron-siderophore permease transmembrane protein/Siderophore coelichelin
498−0.96−6.16SCF34.17cputative peptide monooxygenase/Siderophore coelichelin
499−2.28−4.08SCF34.18putative formyltransferase/Siderophore coelichelin
895−0.57−0.25hrdC/SCM1.28cRNA polymerase principal sigma factor HrdC
1849−2.84−1.28cobNcobalamin biosynthesis protein CobN
2077−1.220.55divIVA/SC4A10.10cDivIVA
2084−2.100.74murG/SC4A10.17cputative UDP-N-acetylglucosamine-N-acetylmuramyl-(pentapeptide) pyrophosphoryl-undecaprenol N-acetylglucosamine transferase MurG
24311.15−0.88abfA/SCC24.02cAbfA
24650.980.31hrdA/SC7A8.04cRNA polymerase principal sigma factor HrdA
27791.860.99acdH/SCC105.10acyl-CoA dehydrogenase AcdH
2780−1.17−2.95SCC105.11putative secreted protein/Desferrioxamines
2781−1.12−1.70SCC105.12hypothetical protein/Desferrioxamines
2782−0.07−3.94SCC105.13putative pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase/Desferrioxamines
2783−0.45−4.20SCC105.14putative monooxygenase/Desferrioxamines
2784−0.61−4.81SCC105.15putative aceytltranferase/Desferrioxamines
2785−1.29−4.54SCC105.16conserved hypothetical protein/Desferrioxamines
3110−2.88−5.29SCE41.19cputative ABC transport system integral membrane protein
3111−4.77−5.37SCE41.20cputative ABC transport system ATP-binding protein
3202−2.35−2.27hrdD/SCE22.19cRNA polymerase principal sigma factor HrdD
32870.86−0.71SCE15.04putative serine/arginine rich protein AbeA
32887.22−1.63SCE15.05putative integral membrane protein AbeB
32895.77−1.64SCE15.06putative large membrane protein AbeC
32908.07−1.80SCE15.07hypothetical protein AbeD
32910.391.53SCE15.08putative regulatory protein AbeR SARP
3322−2.021.16SCE68.20putative membrane protein, a SCO3558 homolog
33233.902.51SCE68.21putative RNA polymerase sigma factor BldN
34133.811.28tipA/SCE9.20transcriptional regulator TipA
3558−2.380.90SCH5.21putative morphological differentiation-associated protein
3559−2.45−0.08SCH5.22cputative oxidoreductase
3607−2.72−1.51SC66T3.18cputative secreted protein
3608−3.18−0.34SC66T3.19chypothetical protein
4654−1.571.74rpoB/SCD82.26DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta chain RpoB
4655−1.471.11rpoC/SCD82.27SCDDNA-directed RNA polymerase beta’ chain RpoC
50690.400.40SCBAC20F6.12putative oxidoreductase/Actinorhodin
50700.870.66SCBAC20F6.13chydroxylacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/Actinorhodin
50711.922.55SCBAC20F6.14chydroxylacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/Actinorhodin
50721.341.99SCBAC20F6.15hydroxylacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/Actinorhodin
50730.742.12SCBAC20F6.16putative oxidoreductase/Actinorhodin
50741.671.83SCBAC20F6.17putative dehydratase/Actinorhodin
50750.922.07ORF4/SCBAC28G1.01putative oxidoreductase/Actinorhodin
50760.670.24actVA1/SCBAC28G1integral membrane protein/Actinorhodin
5077−0.091.19actVA2/SCBAC28G1hypothetical protein/Actinorhodin
50781.650.86actVA3/SCBAC28G1hypothetical protein/Actinorhodin
50792.620.31actVA4/SCBAC28G1conserved hypothetical protein/Actinorhodin
50801.25−0.41actVA5/SCBAC28G1putative hydrolase/Actinorhodin
50810.482.40actVA6/SCBAC28G1hypothetical protein/Actinorhodin
5082−1.180.42actII-1/SCBAC28G1putative transcriptional regulatory protein/Actinorhodin
5083−0.12−2.64actII-2/SCBAC28G1putative actinorhodin transporter/Actinorhodin
50841.31−3.45actII-3/SCBAC28G1putative membrane protein/Actinorhodin
5085−0.825.01actII-4/SCBAC28G1actinorhodin cluster activator protein/Actinorhodin
50860.642.27actIII/SCBAC28G1ketoacyl reductase/Actinorhodin
50870.761.90actI-1/SCBAC28Gactinorhodin polyketide beta-ketoacyl synthaselpha subunit/Actinorhodin
50880.900.84actI-2/SCBAC28Gactinorhodin polyketide beta-ketoacyl synthaseeta subunit/Actinorhodin
50890.672.72actI-3/SCBAC28Gactinorhodin polyketide synthase acyl carrierprotein/Actinorhodin
50900.022.27actVII/SCBAC28G1actinorhodin polyketide synthase bifunctionalyclase/dehydratase/Actinorhodin
5091−0.071.54actIV/SCBAC28G1.1cyclase/Actinorhodin
50920.610.80actVB/SCBAC28G1.1actinorhodin polyketide putative dimerase/Actinorhodin
5572−3.992.24rnc/SC7A1.16ribonuclease III/RNase III
5621−1.703.75whiG/SC2E1.38RNA polymerase sigma factor WhiG
58191.331.96whiHSporulation transcription factor WhiH
5820−0.491.97hrdB/SC5B8.10major vegetative sigma factor HrdB
58771.963.21redDtranscriptional regulator RedD/Prodiginines
58781.340.94redXpolyketide synthase RedX/Prodiginines
58790.330.32redWacyl-coa dehydrogenase RedW/Prodiginines
58800.093.34redYRedY protein/Prodiginines
5881−1.542.78redZresponse regulator/Prodiginines
58820.610.02redV/SC3F7.02cProdiginines
58830.790.87redU/SC3F7.03cProdiginines
58841.410.09SC3F7.04chypothetical protein/Prodiginines
58851.21−0.66SC3F7.05chypothetical protein/Prodiginines
58861.682.31redR/SC3F7.06cProdiginines
58872.600.20redQ/SC3F7.07cProdiginines
58880.94−0.50redP/SC3F7.083-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase/Prodiginines
58892.700.50redO/SC3F7.09hypothetical protein/Prodiginines
58901.650.89redN/SC3F7.10putative 8-amino-7-oxononanoate synthase/Prodiginines
58911.02−0.79redM/St3F7.11putative peptide synthase/Prodiginines
58920.92−0.28redL/SC3F7.12polyketide synthase/Prodiginines
58930.820.08redK/SC3F7.13oxidoreductase/Prodiginines
58940.690.02redJ/SC3F7.14thioesterase/Prodiginines
58951.24−0.04redI/SC3F7.15putative methyltransferase/Prodiginines
58961.450.17SC10A5.01phosphoenolpyruvate-utilizing enzyme/Prodiginines
58972.470.76redG/SC10A5.02Prodiginines
58982.381.57redF/SC10A5.03Prodiginines
6265−0.250.51scbR/SCAH10.30cGamma-butyrolactone binding protein
62661.631.14scbA/SCAH10.31SCB1 butanolide synthase, an AfsA homolog/Gamma-butyrolactone
6267−0.441.19SCAH10.32hypothetical protein, a BprA homolog
69921.825.48absR1/SC8F11.18cregulatory protein AbsR1
69931.312.10absR2/SC8F11.19regulatory protein AbsR2
7221−0.753.04SC2H12.20cGcs type III polyketide synthase
Microorganisms 09 02004 i001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bobek, J.; Mikulová, A.; Šetinová, D.; Elliot, M.; Čihák, M. 6S-Like scr3559 RNA Affects Development and Antibiotic Production in Streptomyces coelicolor. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102004

AMA Style

Bobek J, Mikulová A, Šetinová D, Elliot M, Čihák M. 6S-Like scr3559 RNA Affects Development and Antibiotic Production in Streptomyces coelicolor. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(10):2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bobek, Jan, Adéla Mikulová, Dita Šetinová, Marie Elliot, and Matouš Čihák. 2021. "6S-Like scr3559 RNA Affects Development and Antibiotic Production in Streptomyces coelicolor" Microorganisms 9, no. 10: 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop